tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9311998.post5982446163675416969..comments2024-03-27T07:47:11.168-07:00Comments on LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Glass House PoliticsEUGENE PLAWIUKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11736971647879996375noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9311998.post-77632444055918555632007-05-03T09:52:00.000-07:002007-05-03T09:52:00.000-07:00See my recent post May Daze for my response to you...See my recent post May Daze for my response to your comments, and thanks for the tip JimBobby.EUGENE PLAWIUKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11736971647879996375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9311998.post-44684487694690169012007-05-03T08:12:00.000-07:002007-05-03T08:12:00.000-07:00Eugene, the bottom line here, is the context of pi...Eugene, the bottom line here, is the context of pitching this speech in a church, professing fundamentalism of creativism, intelligent design, while bashing other faiths. <BR/>I also think that in a church, evoking the emotional laden word Nazi, was in poor taste. <BR/>I don't think that May would have attracted this 'attention' if she hadn't been in a church preaching, in a sense a 'green gospel.'<BR/>Sure Monbiot said it, but he wasn't in a church. Others have also made reference to Chamberlaine, but were they in the House of Commons or the House of God?<BR/><BR/>The worse part is, in trying to get media attention for herself as the leader of the Green party, what faded into the background, was the environment. <BR/>Sure Harper and the Cons ran with it, but they only could because May choice to do hyperbole in a church, a church where the Ministery use to be an aid to a Liberal MP, and was delivered to the pulpit by a Liberal MP. Using this setting to give her Green gospel setup the fiasco that has followed.<BR/>Stick with the science. <BR/>And I am not sure why other party's have to defend her stance.<BR/><BR/>What am I missing here? Which bridge did she build, and how many bridges did she burn?susansmithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02573558646874765432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9311998.post-51423082855615098842007-05-03T08:03:00.000-07:002007-05-03T08:03:00.000-07:00Whooee! GeneFeller, it's interestin' how Lizzie ma...Whooee! GeneFeller, it's interestin' how Lizzie makes a comment in church an' the paleo-partisans are jumpin' all over her. When MP's have made the same analogy in Parliament and them comments was recorded in Hansard, the official record of the House o' Comments, nobuddy sed "boo."<BR/><BR/>Here's what I'm wonderin' - is the PM suggestin' there be stricter monitoring of church sermons than of parliamentary debate? Does he advocate one set of rules for MP's and another for guest speakers at church services?<BR/><BR/>An' how 'bout Jack? He used the very same Chamberlain analogy refering to Kyoto and Martin's gummint. Why is it OK for Jack to use the analogy in the HoC but not for Lizzie to use it in a London, On church? Why is the NDP stickin' to its guns even after bein' reminded of Jack's own Chamberlain references?<BR/><BR/>I booged on this today. I'm gettin' dang pissed off at the pot-kettle-glasshouse hypocrisy.<BR/><BR/>JimBobbyJimBobbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04603665575714484326noreply@blogger.com