Friday, March 20, 2020

TRUMP LIES
Fauci throws cold water on Trump's declaration that malaria drug a 'game changer'

Trump on malaria drug for COVID-19: ‘I feel good about it’


A day after President Donald Trump declared an anti-malaria drug a “game changer” in the fight against the novel coronavirus, the nation’s top infectious disease expert downplayed any role it might play in the fast-moving pandemic and said signs of the drug’s promise were purely “anecdotal.”

Fauci’s statements at a White House briefing Friday amounted to clinical cold water thrown on the president’s repeated upbeat assessments on the U.S. fight against the virus, also known as COVID-19.

Trump has falsely declared in recent weeks that anyone who wants a test could get one, despite limited access in parts of the country that continued through this week.

On Thursday, Trump declared an anti-malaria drug called chloroquine a “game changer” in the effort to develop a coronavirus treatment and announced the drug had been “approved.”

Chloroquine, or hydroxychloroquine, has been approved to treat and prevent malaria since 1944. But no drug has been approved to treat COVID-19, and a vaccine is estimated to remain at least a year away.MORE: Chloroquine, an old malaria drug, may help treat novel coronavirus, doctors say 
Donald Trump in a suit and tie: Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a briefing on the latest development of the coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. at the White House, March 20, 2020, in Washington.

© Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a briefing on the latest development of the coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. at the White House, March 20, 2020, in Washington.When asked if the drug was promising Friday, Fauci, standing next to Trump, said “the answer is no” because “the evidence you’re talking about … is anecdotal evidence.”

“The information that you’re referring to specifically is antecdotal,” he added. “It was not done in a controlled clinical trial. So you really can’t make any definitive statement about it.”

Trump then stepped forward to add: “We’ll see. We’re going to know soon.”

The president then repeated his assessment that the drug was potentially a “game changer” and said: "We have millions of units ordered.”

MORE: Trump announces potential 'game changer' on drugs to treat novel coronavirus, but FDA says more study is needed 

When asked if he was giving the nation a false sense of hope, Trump said no.

“It may work, it may not work,” he said. “I feel good about it.”

On chloroquine, U.S. health officials say it’s possible that doctors could try the drug to treat coronavirus symptoms if it’s already on the market. Clinical trials are under way.

But the FDA says it wants to study the potential of the drug before recommending its use, in part so that patients and their doctors don’t waste critical time on a drug that might not work.

On testing, Fauci said it’s true that not everyone who wants a test can get one.

He said access to tests has improved in recent days noticeably, with the private sector having jumped on board.

But, he added, he continues to hear from people unable to determine if a patient has been infected – a serious problem when trying to mitigate the spread.

“I understand and empathize with the people who rightfully are saying I’m trying to get a test and I can’t,” Fauci said.

A reporter asked: “So is that another way of saying we are not at a point where we are meeting the demand pressure?”

“The answer is yes … We are not there yet because otherwise people would never be calling up saying they can’t get a test,” he said.

Fauci and Trump agreed that people without symptoms don’t need to tested. And Fauci said even without testing, communities can respond to the outbreak by limiting social contact.

“Testing is important. It would be nice to know. And there are certain things you could do” with results, Fauci said. “But let’s not conflate testing with the action we have to take,” which includes social distancing and washing hands.


TRUMP IS AN IDIOT
Virus Drug Touted by Trump, Musk Can Kill In Just Two Grams
China recommended chloroquine for coronavirus a month back

Within days, it cautioned against severe side effects


‘It’s not going to kill anybody,’ Trump says at White House

Research still examining safety, effectiveness of chloroquine


(Bloomberg) -- The drug touted by the U.S. President Donald Trump as a possible line of treatment against the coronavirus comes with severe warnings in China and can kill in dosages as little as two grams.

China, where the deadly pathogen first emerged in December, recommended the decades-old malaria drug chloroquine to treat infected patients in guidelines issued in February after seeing encouraging results in clinical trials. But within days, it cautioned doctors and health officials about the drug’s lethal side effects and rolled back its usage.

This came after local media reported that a Wuhan Institute of Virology study found that the drug can kill an adult just dosed at twice the daily amount recommended for treatment, which is one gram.

As the drug hasn’t been approved by the U.S. Food And Drug Administration to treat the disease known as Covid-19, the Chinese experience may be useful as the American regulator studies the medication which has been endorsed by Trump as well as Tesla Inc. chief executive officer Elon Musk.

© Photographer: Barcroft Media/Barcroft Media An employee checks the production of chloroquine phosphate, resumed after a 15-year break, in a pharmaceutical company in Nantong city in east China's Jiangsu province Thursday, Feb. 27, 2020.

The pandemic, which has sickened more than 235,000 globally and killed over 9,800 people, has triggered growing anxiety across the U.S. as states say they lack testing kits and medical equipment. California instituted a state-wide lockdown on Thursday to slow the outbreak.

Chloroquine was among the first group of therapies Chinese scientists identified as being effective in curbing the new coronavirus. Clinical trials on about 130 patients demonstrated the drug’s ability to reduce the severity of the illness and speed up virus clearance, according to China’s Ministry of Sciences and Technology.

Chroloquine phosphate was officially recommended on Feb. 19 in the Covid-19 treatment guidelines published by China’s National Health Commission, along with a few other drugs such as AbbVie Inc.’s Kaletra and flu drug arbidol as antiviral treatments for patients. The commission recommended no more than a 10-day course of chloroquine for adult patients at 500mg -- half a gram -- twice a day.


The Search for New Drugs for Coronavirus Faces Long Odds

As hundreds of clinical trials are launched to study potential Covid-19 treatments, stocks of drugmakers and biotechnology companies have racked up big gains on the hope that the industry will see a windfall. But the history of previous viral outbreaks like Ebola and Zika show little success in producing viable treatments. Some potential drugs were developed only after the epidemics already waned through containment measures.
Closely Watched

China’s recommendation to use chloroquine in treatment was quickly followed by a warning.

Two days after the treatment guideline update, health authorities in Hubei province -- China’s worst-hit region where the outbreak started and which accounted for majority of its over 80,000 patients -- asked hospitals to closely watch for, and immediately report, any adverse side effects of chloroquine phosphate, according to a report in local media outlet The Paper.

The drug is known to have short-term side effects such as nausea, diarrhea and tinnitus while long-term use can irreversibly impair eyesight. It’s forbidden for pregnant women as it can cause congenital defects in babies.

China Health Commission revised the dosage in a Feb. 29 notice tightening chloroquine use. The drug cannot be given to pregnant women, those with heart disease, terminal liver and renal disease, retina and hearing loss and patients on antibiotics such as azithromycin and steroid.

It can now be given only to patients between 18 to 65 years of age for a seven-day treatment course. Patients weighing over 50 kilograms (110 pounds) can take 500mg twice a day -- the usual dose -- while those weighing less will be administered the drug just once a day after two days of use, according to the latest guidelines.

A woman in Wuhan proved how lethal chloroquine can be when it’s taken beyond the recommended dose. On Feb. 25, Shanghai-based The Paper reported that she took 1.8 grams of the drug she ordered online after suspecting she had the coronavirus. She did not, but the drug caused her to develop malignant cardiac arrhythmia, which can cause sudden death, and she was admitted to the intensive care unit.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.


TRUMP IS AN IDIOT
Trump Touts Drug That FDA Says Isn’t Yet Approved for Virus 

By Anna Edney March 19, 2020

‘It’s not going to kill anybody,’ Trump says at White House

Research still examining safety, effectiveness of chloroquine

Trump Says Malaria Drug Approved to Treat Coronavirus


The Food and Drug Administration has been told by President Donald Trump to see if it can expand the use of a decades-old malaria drug as an experimental treatment for coronavirus patients.

The drug, chloroquine, hasn’t yet been approved for treatment of Covid-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus. While it’s been available for decades for malaria, it’s not clear whether it will work against the new illness. A March 10 review of existing research found there’s little solid proof one way or the other.

During an at-times-confusing White House press conference, Trump said that chloroquine was approved for use and that he wanted to “remove every barrier” to test more drugs against Covid-19 and “allow many more Americans to access drugs that have shown really good promise.”

“Normally the FDA would take a long time to approve something like that, and it’s -- it was approved very, very quickly and it’s now approved by prescription,” Trump said.

An FDA spokesperson said the drug hadn’t been approved for use in Covid-19 patients. However, U.S. doctors are legally able to prescribe a drug for any illness or condition they think is medically appropriate.

More than a dozen generic drugmakers, including Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Mylan NV and Novartis AG’s Sandoz unit, manufacture chloroquine, also called hydroxychloroquine. It comes with few major known side effects, is relatively inexpensive and is widely used around the world. It’s also been touted by Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk as a potential treatment, and China has been testing it as well.

Mylan said in a statement Thursday it would immediately ramp up manufacturing of hydroxychloroquine pills at its West Virgina facility to meet expected high demand if the medication is shown to be effective against the disease. The generic-drug giant expects to be able to supply the drug by mid-April, ultimately providing 50 million tablets to potentially treat more than 1.5 million patients.

Other drugmakers are also developing experimental treatments and vaccines for Covid-19, with results from a Gilead Sciences Inc. drug, remdesivir, expected next month.

Gilead shares closed down 1.1% at $78.55 in New York, after earlier rising as much as 8.2%.

Press Conference

Trump has called for rules to be relaxed and government authority to be expanded to respond to the coronavirus outbreak, which has resulted in more than 200,000 confirmed cases and at least 9,000 deaths around the globe. Cities have been locked down and economies brutalized as governments try to prevent the spread.

At Thursday’s press conference, Trump and FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn appeared to differ substantially about the status of the drugs being tested.

Trump said chloroquine had been approved and could be given to patients by doctors with a prescription.

“It’s been around for a long time, so we know that if things don’t go as planned it’s not going to kill anybody,” Trump said.

Shortly thereafter, Hahn said that use of the drug would be in a controlled trial to find out whether or not it works, and if so, what dose would be safe and effective.

“We want to do that in a setting of a clinical trial,” Hahn said.

There was similar confusion over Gilead’s drug, which Trump said was “essentially approved.”

Hahn said afterward that remdesivir is “going through the normal process” and isn’t yet available to patients.


The FDA has increasingly stepped back from its regulatory role in the middle of the crisis, announcing that it would let states regulate tests to diagnose the virus in order to speed their rollout. It has also said it is temporarily halting inspections of drug plants in the U.S. and abroad.

The agency’s standard for drugs is to look at the risk posed by side effects compared with how effective treatments are. But the growing number of coronavirus cases in the U.S., and the lack of any proven therapy or vaccine, may have tilted that balance.
Drug Pipeline

Gilead’s remdesivir was originally developed for use against the Ebola virus. The drugmaker is expected to report early results of tests of the experimental medicine in April.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. said Tuesday its development efforts for a drug to treat the virus are ahead of schedule and it could start testing in humans this summer. Several vaccines are also in development.

Even those in Trump’s inner circle have cautioned against equating early research on drugs with proof that they work.

Deborah Birx, a member of the president’s coronavirus task force, said during Wednesday’s White House briefing that Trump had asked for a briefing on potential treatments for the virus. Birx said that even evidence a drug works in animals doesn’t mean it will work in people.

“Of course, there’s always anecdotal reports, and we’re trying to figure out how many anecdotal reports equal real scientific breakthroughs,” Birx said.

A small percentage of people die from infection by the coronavirus, and the vast majority get better on their own as their immune system battles the pathogen. That can make it more challenging to determine whether experimental drugs are effective.

— With assistance by Riley Griffin

(Adds information about Mylan manufacturing in seventh paragraph. An earlier version of this story corrected the number of cases around the globe.)



Early Coronavirus Drug Trials Yield Mixed Results 

By Jason Gale March 19, 2020, 1:04 AM MDT

HIV drug combination shows no benefit in severe patients
 
Fujifilm medicine linked to materially faster viral clearance



Coronavirus Vaccine Test Open
Drug trials on coronavirus patients in China yielded mixed results, with an HIV pill showing little benefit and a flu medication made by Fujifilm Holdings Corp. resulting in faster clearance of the virus.

The combination of lopinavir and ritonavir, marketed by AbbVie Inc. as Kaletra, didn’t improve the condition of severe Covid-19 patients or prevent them from dying more than standard care in a randomized, controlled trial of 199 patients. The research was published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

A separate study of 80 patients receiving Fujifilm’s favipiravir, or Avigan, found it helped clear the virus from patients a week earlier than the HIV medicine and was associated with improved chest symptoms shown on CT scans.

The favipiravir study, which wasn’t randomized, was conducted in a different group of patients and at a later time point when doctors might have discovered better ways to care for patients, Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat said in a note.

Avigan influenza tablets.Photographer: Akio Kon/Bloomberg

The clinical research on favipiravir augers well for another anti-viral, Gilead Sciences Inc.’s experimental drug remdesivir, which is also undergoing clinical trials in China, Tyler Van Buren, an analyst with Piper Sandler said. Results of the remdesivir study are yet to be published.

“If successful, it could be approved for broad use in the coming months considering it’s safe, the bar for efficacy in the context of the ongoing global pandemic is low,” he said.

Patients in the lopinavir and ritonavir trial were also found to show more gastrointestinal side effects such as vomiting and diarrhea than those not given the drug in the comparison group. Nearly 14% of those taking the drug were unable to finish the 14-day therapy, mostly because of the gastrointestinal disorders.

— With assistance by Michelle Fay Cortez, Cristin Flanagan, and Dong Lyu
TRUMP IS AN IDIOT
Trump rips reporter who asked him to calm scared Americans as 'terrible'

'You're a terrible reporter': Pressed on coronavirus, Trump berates NBC's Peter Alexander

President Donald Trump excoriated an NBC News correspondent as a “terrible reporter” on Friday after he asked the president to calm Americans who were scared because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump’s latest personal broadside on the media came at a news conference in which he appeared to minimize the fears of the American public by saying there was cause for optimism about drug therapies for coronavirus — treatments that one of his top government scientists had said were not at all proven.

At the Trump administration's coronavirus task force's daily briefing, Trump’s director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made clear that any evidence about drug therapies being tested at the moment was strictly “anecdotal” and not the product of a “clinical trial.”

“You really can’t make any definitive statement about it,” Fauci said.

Trump nevertheless said he felt "good" about the treatments and that the federal government had already ordered "millions of units" of them.

NBC News’ Peter Alexander then asked Trump whether his “positive spin” regarding the potential treatments was giving Americans false hope.

“Is it possible that your impulse to put a positive spin on things may be giving Americans a false sense of hope?” Alexander asked.

“No I don’t think so,” Trump replied.

“It may work, it may not work, Trump said. “I feel good about. That’s all it is, it’s a feeling.”

Alexander responded by asking Trump to talk directly to Americans who are scared by the pandemic, which triggered the president to reply with an insult.

“What do you say to Americans who are scared, millions who are scared right now?” Alexander asked.

“I say that you’re a terrible reporter,” Trump said. “That’s what I say. I think that’s a very nasty question.”

“You’re doing sensationalism,” Trump said.

U.S. stocks, which had been up for the day before Trump began the news conference, tumbled steadily as the president spoke. In recent trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down more than 100 points, or 0.6 percent.

Trump returned to the topic of media coverage later in the news conference, using another question from another reporter to levy an additional attack on Alexander.

"I’ve dealt with Peter for a long time," Trump said. "And I think Peter is not a good journalist."

TRUMP IS AN IDIOT
Trump Lashes Out at Reporter After Challenge on Unapproved Drug


President Trump calls NBC’s Peter Alexander a “terrible reporter.”


Virus Drug Touted by Trump, Musk Can Kill In Just Two Grams


Trump Touts Drug That FDA Says Isn’t Yet Approved for Virus 


By Josh Wingrove and Jordan Fabian March 20, 2020


President Donald Trump again encouraged Americans to try a malaria drug to fight coronavirus that the FDA hasn’t approved for the disease, and assailed a reporter who suggested that pushing it might spark a false sense of hope.
“I think people will be surprised,” Trump said of the drug, chloroquine, at a White House news conference on Friday. “It will be a game changer.”

NBC correspondent Peter Alexander pointed out that Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, has said there is no “magic drug” for the virus and asked whether Trump was providing a “false sense of hope.”

Trump replied: “Such a lovely question. Maybe and maybe not. It may work and it may not work,” he said. “I feel good about it.”

When Alexander then asked what Trump had to say to Americans who are “scared” by the outbreak, Trump grew angry, calling Alexander a “terrible reporter” and saying his question sent “very bad signal.”

“You ought to get back to reporting instead of sensationalism,” he said, adding that “I’ve been right a lot.”

“You ought to be ashamed of yourself,” he added.

When another reporter followed up, asking again what Trump had to say to Americans worried about the virus, Trump said: “There is a very low incidence of death. You understand that,” adding that Americans who contract the disease are very likely to survive.


TRUMP IS AN IDIOT
Sean Spicer debuts as White House reporter during heated Trump coronavirus briefing

© Alex Wong/Getty Images Former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer sits among members of the press as he waits for the beginning of a news briefing on the latest development of the coronavirus outbreak on Friday.

President Donald Trump heaped scorn on several members of the White House press corps at a coronavirus briefing Friday, but made a point of responding to questions from a new reporter in the briefing room: His former press secretary.

“Mr. President, two questions if you would indulge me,”

Sean Spicer said when Trump pointed a finger to call on his former aid
Spicer, of course, is the former White House and Republican National Committee spokesman who vigorously defended Trump’s inauguration crowd size claims and regularly tangled with reporters during combative White House briefings before his ouster in a 2017 shakeup. He also took a spin on “Dancing With The Stars.”

Spicer now has his own political talk show for the conservative Newsmax TV outlet. By the time Trump entered the White House Briefing Room to address reporters Friday, Spicer was set to press his old boss for presidential reaction to small business anxieties and reports that senators unloaded stocks before a pandemic-sparked market downturn.

The surreal scene played out moments after the president castigated NBC’s Peter Alexander for suggesting that Trump may be giving Americans “a false sense of hope” about coronavirus treatment, asking what he would say to Americans who are scared or sickened by the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak.

“I say that you are a terrible reporter. That's what I say,” Trump told Alexander. “I think that's a very nasty question, and I think it's a very bad signal that you're putting out to the American people. The American people are looking for answers, and they are looking for hope. And you are doing sensationalism.”

Trump’s attacks on the news media are a familiar tactic at his campaign rallies and press conferences. After a brief détente earlier this week, the president lashed out at the media again during Thursday’s briefing. Friday's spat with Alexander, juxtaposed with Spicer’s presence on the other side of the podium, further heightened the strains with the press corps.

Ultimately, Trump used Spicer's questions to praise his administration's response to small businesses hammered by the outbreak and defend senators who reportedly sold stock before markets tanked in response to the pandemic, though he made sure to call out only one of them — a California Democrat — by name.


"I saw some names. I know all of them. I know everyone mentioned," Trump replied to Spicer. "Dianne Feinstein, I guess. And a couple of others. I don't know too much about what it's about, but I find them to all be very honorable people. That’s all I know. And they said they did nothing wrong. I find them — the whole group, very honorable people."
https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/03/watchdog-group-files-complaints-against.html

Friday's exchanges didn't sit well with some other reporters."What the president did to Peter Alexander is reprehensible," CNN anchor John King declared after Friday's press conference.

"It was striking that this came, this, forgive me, bulls*** attack on fake news came just moments after the secretary of State said the American people have to be careful about where they get their information and go to sources they can trust."
Mystery surrounds ‘crazed’ and dying monkeys in Indian state hit by coronavirus

MONKEYS in Indian states hit by coronavirus are dying in mysterious circumstances, leaving vets baffled.


By LAURA O'CALLAGHAN 
PUBLISHED: Fri, Mar 20, 2020 

In the past few days alone eight females and one male have been found dead in the Thrissur district of Kerala, Daily Star Online has reported. Rangers in the area have ruled out Kyasanur Forest Disease (KFD) or monkey fever. A team of experts at the National Institute of Virology in Pune carried out tests.

The animals’ bodies were found in Mele Vettikkattiri near Attoor on Monday.
The state has recently been hit by coronavirus and bird flu.
Vets examined the bodies of the dead animals and found all the females had inflamed uteruses and their stomachs were empty.
Mystery surrounds the deaths of monkeys in an Indian state hit by coronavirus (Image: GETTY)
Monkeys have been dying in mysterious circumstances in an Indian state (Image: GETTY)
This raised fears of an undetermined sexual infection.
Forest vet Dr David Abraham said: “There is a possibility that they would have got the infection from an alpha male monkey of that herd.”
Earlier, four other monkeys were found dead in an orch
Western tourists play with monkeys in India (Image: GETTY)

And two monkeys were seen going “mad” in Puranpur Tehsil in Pilibhit.
One animal bit an official and rangers have stepped up patrols in the vicinity
Teams have been sent to patrol the area around Puranpur railway station, where “a monkey seems to have gone mad, for the last three days”, according to a local ranger.
Monkeys climb across electricity wires in India (Image: GETTY)

He said: “We had found four dead monkeys in a mango orchard at Keshopur village and immediately sent their carcasses for an autopsy.
“Two injured monkeys had been treated at Puranpur range office."
Suspicion is growing that monkeys may have been poisoned by village
Vets have been baffled by the recent spate of events (Image: GETTY)

Dr Rajiv Mishra, deputy chief veterinary officer, said the bodies of the monkeys were sent to the government forensic laboratory in Mathura for testing.
He said: “We are waiting for the report to reach any final conclusion about the reason behind monkeys’ death.” he added.
He said the monkey which was reported to have “gone crazy” near the railway station may have drank toxic water.
Woman Has Touching Reunion With Cat Who'd Been Missing For Years

Nearly four years ago, after a powerful earthquake struck central Italy, an older woman named Dora was among those displaced. But she lost more than just her home.


Amid the chaos and confusion following the disaster, Dora’s beloved cat went missing, never to be seen again.

That is, until recently.

Last week, a person close to Dora took to social media to announce that her long-lost cat had finally reappeared — bringing their many years apart to the happiest of ends.

“Our dear Dora has never stopped looking for him,” Mimma Bei, Dora's friend, wrote. “Who knows where he had have been for so long.”Here’s a video of that heartwarming reunion:

Fortunately, Dora’s cat appeared to be in good physical health despite his long absence. But to be together again, it's plain to see, both their hearts are now complete again, too.

Coronavirus study finds virus can survive for FIVE WEEKS in body after infection
CORONAVIRUS can live in patients for up to five weeks after they first contract the infection, a study has found, questioning current self-isolation measures.

By CALLUM HOARE PUBLISHED: Mar 13, 2020 

The deadly disease has now infected more than 135,000 people worldwide, claiming the lives of almost 5,000 people in the process. Yesterday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced fresh plans to tackle COVID-19 in the UK, which included a new seven-day self-isolation measure for those even showing mild symptoms, in order to protect the most vulnerable members of society. The plan is half of the original 14-day suggestion – which the Government now says is for people who have experienced "exposure to a confirmed case but have not shown symptoms".

But, a new study has shown that the deadly virus could linger in patients for more than a month, suggesting it is possible to transmit the virus long after the incubation period noted by the Prime Minister.

The findings, published in The Lancet this week, looked at viral shedding – the length of time the virus can be transmitted after someone is infected.

It was found in one instance to be 37 days after the person contracted the illness and the median duration was 20 days, which is far greater than the maximum 14 days suggested.

It points out: “Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.”

Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation

Study

Chinese researchers studied 191 patients infected with COVID-19 at Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital.

Of the patients, 54 had died from the infection, which remained in their systems until death.


Dr Fei Zhou, of the Peking Union Medical College, wrote: “[The results have] important implications for both patient-isolation decision-making and guidance around the length of antiviral treatment.”

The paper also notes that 48 percent of coronavirus patients had additional health issues, such as hypertension, diabetes and coronary heart disease, which decreased their odds of kicking the virus, along with old age.
 
The Government recommends a seven-day isolation (Image: GETTY)
By comparison, only a third of patients with SARS still harboured the virus in their respiratory tract after as long as four weeks, the Chinese scientists said.

For influenza cases, viral shedding typically persists five to 10 days, beginning within 24 hours before or after the onset of symptoms.

Children and immunocompromised individuals, however, may shed longer – for weeks or months – according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

The UK has now officially moved from the "contain" stage to the "delay" phase now, after the tenth death was confirmed from a total of 590 cases.
The NHS is under strain (Image: GETTY)

Mr Johnson said it was "the worst public health crisis for a generation" and warned many families they would "lose loved ones before their time".

Schools have been advised to cancel trips abroad, while over 70s and those with pre-existing health conditions have been told not to go on cruises.

Mass gatherings have not been cancelled yet, but the Premierl League is to suspend all games until at least April 4.

The Prime Minister said it was important to get the timing right for stricter measures.
Coronavirus: Scientist's warning to Wuhan lab in 2017 exposed

WUHAN's level-four biosafety lab caused concern for scientists back in 2017, ahead of its opening a year later, unearthed reports show.

By CALLUM HOARE PUBLISHED: Mon, Mar 16, 2020


Last week, Iran’s former President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stunned the world with his COVID-19 claims, as he stated: “It is clear to the world that the mutated coronavirus was produced in a lab,” echoing US Senator Tom Cotton’s comments last month. The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a level four biosafety laboratory around 12 miles from the seafood market, marks the epicentre of the outbreak. China installed the first of a planned five to seven biolabs designed for maximum safety in Wuhan in 2017, for the purpose of studying the most high-risk pathogens, including Ebola and SARS, but the move worried one expert over the culture in the communist state.


Tim Trevan, a biosafety consultant, told Nature in 2017: “Diversity of viewpoint, flat structures where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of information are important.”

But lab director Yuan Zhiming defended the institution, saying that measures have been introduced to promote more openness.

He said in 2017: “We tell them the most important thing is that they report what they have or haven’t done.


“Transparency is the basis of the lab.”
Scientists had a warning over the Wuhan lab (Image: GETTY)
Wuhan was at the epicentre of the outnbreak (Image: GETTY)

Monkeys can run, they can scratch, they can bite
Richard Ebright


In 2004, the World Health Organisation confirmed SARS – a distant relative of COVID-19 – had escaped a Beijing lab twice, via two separate workers.

A spokesman said: “We suspect two people, a 26-year-old female postgraduate student and a 31-year-old male postdoc, were both infected, apparently in two separate incidents."

Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, noted this incident before the opening of the Wuhan lab as a cause for concern.

He was not convinced there was a need for another lab in mainland China and the prospect of ramping up opportunities to inject monkeys with pathogens also worried him.

He added: “They can run, they can scratch, they can bite.”
 
Researchers sent warnings over the Wuhan lab (Image: GETTY)
Coronavirus shock claim: ‘Smoking gun of Chinese lab leak’ exposed

He also questioned whether the Wuhan lab was entirely focused on research, stating: “These facilities are inherently dual-use.”

However, speaking more recently, Dr Ebright clarified to DailyMail.com: “At this point, there's no reason to harbour suspicions."

The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, housed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was set up in the hope of helping China contribute to research on the world's most dangerous viruses.

Constructed in 2015, the lab was still undergoing safety testing, but near ready to open in 2017.

Coronavirus: Is this PROOF China's been lying about outbreak? [REVEALED]
  
A fish market in Wuhan is said to have been central to the spread (Image: GETTY)
coronavirus has sparked worldwide implications (Image: GETTY)

It was the first-ever lab in the country designed to meet biosafety-level-4 (BSL-4) standards, the highest biohazard level, meaning that it would be qualified to handle the most dangerous pathogens.

BSL-4 labs have to be equipped with airtight hazmat suits or special workspaces that confine viruses and bacteria that can be transmitted through the air to sealed boxes that scientists reach into using attached high-grade gloves.

There are about 54 BSL-4 labs worldwide.

China's first, in Wuhan, received federal accreditation in January 2017.
The US Owes $23.5 Trillion – But Can Still Afford A Big Coronavirus Stimulus Package

THE USA CAN AFFORD DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM

MEDICARE FOR ALL, UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME, LIVING WAGE, ETC.




By William D. Lastrapes 03/19/20



The U.S. government now owes over $23.5 trillion in debt, or about $71,000 for every man, woman and child living within its borders. It has risen $3 trillion since President Trump took office in 2017 and is almost double what it was just 10 years ago.

U.S. government officials are discussing another expensive stimulus package – possibly as much as $1 trillion and bigger than the one enacted in 2009 during the midst of the financial crisis – to help the U.S. economy make it through the coronavirus pandemic.

But in light of its large debt, can the federal government really afford more spending?

The national debt represents the accumulation of past deficits that the federal government has run, pretty much continuously, since 1931. Prior to that, surpluses were much more common, apart from the years following the Civil War.


But its size is not a problem. The amount of government debt simply reflects the timing of taxes. Higher spending and lower taxes today mean more borrowing that will need to be paid off by higher taxes in the future.

The US budget deficit is expected to average $1.3 trillion through 2030 as the debt grows to 98% of GDP Photo: GETTY / MARK WILSON

Not everyone will be happy about that, and the government’s resources are not unlimited. But because the economy grows over time, collecting those future taxes make spending today affordable.

In addition, the $23.5 trillion figure, while large, is a bit misleading because $6 trillion of this is owed to other government agencies like Social Security. While that’s real money, it’s a bit like owing your spouse.

As long as U.S. fiscal institutions are strong and effective, and the long-run productive capacity of the nation’s economy is secure, there is no economic reason to worry the government can’t afford a large stimulus package.

To remain solvent and ultimately pay what it owes, the Treasury – which sells notes and bonds to investors frequently to raise money to finance the deficit – need only balance its books over the long run, rather than over an arbitrary unit of time like a year. So annual national deficits are not always a cause for concern.

Historically low interest rates on government debt suggest that bond market participants agree with this view.

And in times of crisis, U.S. debt is seen as a haven, pushing borrowing costs even lower. Indeed, with these low rates, sufficient economic growth can allow the government to borrow indefinitely.

Many economists, including me, argue that fiscal stimulus is needed now because the disruptions from social distancing and other necessary precautions against the coronavirus will likely drive the economy into recession. The state of the nation’s public health is a valid concern of the federal government, as is mitigating the harm recessions can do to workers and small business.

The pandemic will end – that we can be sure of – and the economy will get back on track over time. But worries about the debt should not prevent government actions from helping people now. We can afford it.

This is an updated version of an article originally published on Feb. 14, 2019.

William D. Lastrapes is Professor of Economics at the University of Georgia.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation. Read the original article here.




The Mighty Nile, Threatened By Waste, Warming, Mega-dam



By Farid Farid 03/19/20 



Early one morning in Cairo, volunteers paddle their kayaks across the Nile, fishing out garbage from the mighty waterway that gave birth to Egyptian civilisation but now faces multiple threats.

Egypt's lifeline since Pharaonic days and the source of 97 percent of its water is under massive strain from pollution and climate change and now the threat of a colossal dam being built far upstream in Ethiopia.

Undeterred, the flotilla of some 300 environmental activists do what they can -- in the past three years they say they have picked some 37 tonnes of cans, plastic bottles, disposable bags and other trash from the waters and shores along the Nile in Egypt.
The Nile is under massive strain from pollution and climate change and now the threat of a colossal dam being built far upstream in Ethiopia Photo: AFP / Khaled DESOUKI

"People have to understand that the Nile is as important -- if not more -- than the pyramids," said Mostafa Habib, 29, co-founder of the environmental group Very Nile.

"The generations coming after us will depend on it."

His fears echo those that millions worldwide share about other over-taxed and polluted rivers from the Mekong to the Mississippi -- an issue to be marked on World Water Day on March 22.
In the past three years, the environmental activists say they have picked some 37 tonnes of rubbish from the waters and shores along the Nile in Egypt Photo: AFP / Khaled DESOUKI

But few waterways face greater strain than the 6,600-kilometre (4,100-mile) Nile, the basin of which stretches across 11 countries -- Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda.



No country is more reliant on the Nile than Egypt, whose teeming population has just passed 100 million people -- over 90 percent of whom live along the river's banks.

Surrounded by a green valley full of palm trees, the north-flowing river is awash with boats of all sizes for tourism, fishing and leisure.

No country is more reliant on the Nile than Egypt -- over 90 percent of its population live along the river's banks Photo: AFP / KHALED DESOUKI

"All of us Egyptians benefit from the Nile, so cleaning it up is a way of giving back to my country," said one of the volunteers, Walied Mohamed, a 21-year-old university student.


"The Nile is the main source of drinking water for Egypt. We have no other major rivers flowing in our country."



Despite its importance, the Nile is still heavily polluted in Egypt Photo: AFP / Khaled DESOUKI



Around seven percent of Egyptians lack access to clean drinking water and over eight million go without proper sanitation Photo: AFP / KHALED DESOUKI

Despite its importance, the Nile is still heavily polluted in Egypt by waste water and rubbish poured directly in to it, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial waste, with consequences for biodiversity, especially fishing, and human health, experts say.

Around 150 million tonnes of industrial waste are dumped into it every year, according to the state-run Environmental Affairs Agency.

Climate change spells another threat as rising sea levels are set to push Mediterranean salt water deep into the fertile Nile river delta, the nation's bread basket.

Fears about the Nile echo those that millions worldwide share about other over-taxed and polluted rivers -- an issue to be marked on World Water Day on March 22 Photo: AFP / KHALED DESOUKI

Researchers predict the country's already stretched agricultural sector could shrink by as much as 47 percent by 2060 as a result of saltwater intrusion.

Cotton, one of the most widely cultivated plants along the Nile, requires a lot of water.

Egypt also faces a nationwide fresh water shortage by 2025, according to the UN.

The construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, set to be Africa's largest, is also raising fears in downstream countries Egypt and Sudan Photo: AFP / EDUARDO SOTERAS

Already around seven percent of Egyptians lack access to clean drinking water and over eight million go without proper sanitation.

Hydrologists say people face water scarcity when their supply drops below 1,000 cubic metres per person annually.

Egyptian officials say in 2018 the individual share was 570 cubic metres and that this is expected to further drop to 500 cubic metres by 2025.

But aside from all the existing threats, there is another issue that terrifies Egypt's national planners and has even sparked fears of war.

Sudan and Egypt worry the new dam's high wall will trap their essential water supplies when the giant reservoir starts to be filled Photo: AFP / OZAN KOSE

More than 3,000 kilometres (2,000 miles) upstream on the Blue Nile, the main tributary, thousands of workers have toiled for almost a decade to build the $4.5-billion Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, set to be Africa's largest.

Downstream countries, mainly Egypt but also drought-plagued Sudan, fear that the dam's 145-metre (475-foot) high wall will trap their essential water supplies once the giant reservoir, the size of London, starts being filled this summer.

Years of tensions between Cairo, Khartoum and Addis Ababa have even seen Washington jump in to mediate rounds of crisis diplomacy.

For Ethiopia, one of Africa's fastest-growing economies, the dam is a prestige project and source of national pride.

In a country of 110 million where even the capital is plagued by blackouts, it promises to provide electricity by 2025 to the more than half of the population that now lives without it.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has insisted the project will not be stopped, warning that if necessary "we can deploy many millions".

In less belligerent but equally dramatic language, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi told the United Nations last year that "the Nile is a question of life, a matter of existence to Egypt".

For some farmers in Sudan, the dam promises to tame rainy season floods that inundate farms with silt and destroy crops and houses.

One Blue Nile farmer whom AFP visited in November, Osman Idris, said "it's a renegade river, it rises so fast".

If its flow is regulated, "we can plant crops through the year", explained the 60-year-old farmer.

"It will be better for the environment and for marketing our products, which means more income for us."

For Egypt, the crucial question now is at what rate Ethiopia plans to fill the 74-billion-cubic-metre reservoir -- Cairo demands it at least triple its proposed period of three to four years.

But experts also warn that Egypt must change its own water management practices.

"Egypt needs to invest in non-Nile sources of water," said Jeannie Sowers, a political science professor at University of New Hampshire who authored a book on Egypt's environmental policies.

"This means prioritising desalination plants on the coasts... and improving irrigation and drainage networks," she told AFP.

While steps have got under way on this, progress has been hampered by bureaucratic problems and economic woes linked to the Arab Spring protests of 2011.

Justin Mankin, a Dartmouth University geographer who wrote a study on climate change impacting the Nile, told AFP that "water stress will become widespread in the region, irrespective of rainfall increases".

He emphasised that the "region's governments must take steps to create water sharing schemes and practices that can ensure a sufficient and equitable distribution of water over the coming decades."

Meanwhile, the Egyptian volunteers push on in their kayaks and row boats doing what they can to reduce the garbage piled up on the Nile's banks.

"We have a treasure and we really haven't taken care of it," said Nour Serry, a Cairo graphic designer and avid volunteer.

"As Egyptians, we should be more attuned to cleaning up our Nile and the surrounding environment. This is our source of life."

Copyright AFP. All rights reserved.
The World Is More Dissatisfied With Democracy Than Ever, Research Says

By Dominic Nicosia 01/28/20

Donald Trump Embraces Dictators And Is A Threat To Democracy - Elizabeth Warren

KEY POINTS


Over 57 percent of the world is not satisfied with democracy 

The figure includes over half of all Americans

Satisfaction is at an all-time high in many European countries


Global dissatisfaction with democracy has reached an all-time high, according to new research from Cambridge University. Despite what many might be quick to believe, these negative sentiment actually predates the current acrimonious political climate.

A massive 25-year study of 154 countries and over four million people released on Wednesday revealed that 57.5 percent of respondents are dissatisfied with democracy. Additional research indicated that 2019 marked “the highest level of democratic discontent” on record. The findings were reported by CNBC.

Over the last 25 years, global discontent toward the once-celebrated system of government grew from a little over a third to more than half of all respondents. Shifts in satisfaction levels were often a response to “objective circumstances and events” such as economic shocks and corruption scandals, the report said.


THE DISSATISFACTION IS WITH CAPITALISM NOT DEMOCRACY

One of the largest and most notable jumps in dissatisfaction came after the 2008 financial crisis, a spike of over 6.5 percent. Another alarming revelation of the report is that many large democracies, including the U.S., Australia, the U.K. and Brazil, were now at their highest-ever level of dissatisfaction with democracy. According to the report, the U.S. in particular had seen a “dramatic and unexpected” decline in satisfaction with the system.


At the study’s inception in 1995, more than 75 percent of U.S. citizens were satisfied with American democracy. Confidence was dramatically shaken after the 2008 financial crash and has been dipping ever since. Today, fewer than 50 percent of Americans are satisfied with the democracy in their country. “Such levels of democratic dissatisfaction would not be unusual elsewhere,” the report said. “But for the United States, it marks an ‘end of exceptionalism’ — a profound shift in America’s view of itself, and therefore, of its place in the world.”

Meanwhile, in Europe, satisfaction with democracy is at an all-time high, particularly in countries like Denmark, Switzerland and Norway.



Workplace Culture: How Team 'Recess' Translates To A Better Product


By Oskar Konstantyner 02/29/20

Who says recess is just for schoolchildren?

A short break of (somewhat) unstructured, yet supervised play, recess is easily dismissed as something we outgrow, even if research shows it is incredibly beneficial. However, when applied correctly, the concept of recess offers a beneficial tool for any team. In the same way that recess gives kids a chance to use different parts of their brains and take a physical break from mental work, unstructured time can be transformative for your teams.

This “recess”-like block of time can take many forms. For engineers, it might occur on a Friday after a long development sprint. Or a marketing team might pause after a product launch to unwind and reset before preparing for the next campaign. But whatever structure or name it may take, a specific period of less structured time during the workday can bring tangible, measurable improvements to your product and your business.

I’ve personally experienced the benefits of this system. At my company, “Friday Projects” have become part of our development team’s culture. At the end of every sprint, we block off time to use as we wish. Of course, this free time has its boundaries (it’s not time to run errands or take the team axe throwing), but the arrival of Friday Projects is always highly anticipated.


In the end, real product improvements and major cross-team collaborations occur, along with a host of other intangible benefits. All of it reinvigorates the team for the next sprint, often equipping team members with new ways of thinking or an improved set of tools.

If you’re wondering if this kind of break might benefit your team, the short answer is “yes.” But there are several lessons and best practices my team has learned that can help you achieve the benefits of this concept even faster.


Encourage teams to break boundaries. The idea behind Friday Projects is to pursue something we are personally passionate about. As engineers, we now take greater ownership over the end product and are more able to see projects we develop through to completion. And pursuing these passion projects sometimes means breaking out of our own professional silos and working with departments we don’t often interact with. As a result, this added free time has allowed us to push out countless “nice-to-have” features to our product that would not have happened otherwise.


Make sure good work gets noticed. A passion project is only rewarding if it actually gets done. For our team, we have a rule that any new product feature or update gets released publicly. This ensures a level of accountability, but also makes sure our work doesn’t get lost. When applying this in your organization, encourage your teams to champion the work they do during unstructured time. This can be a happy hour celebrating a feature launch or ordering T-shirts celebrating a new product update — whatever it is, don’t let good work go unused or unrecognized.

Take time to look inward. Free time can also be a great time to reflect on work life outside of sprint deadlines and product launches. What tools are we using? Why? Is there a better way to do this? These strategic questions are often pushed aside by day-to-day concerns, but it doesn’t make them any less important. Many of us have used our Friday Projects time to form working groups that tackle these questions. On several occasions, we have used the time to research and purchase better development tools and integrations for our engineers. In other instances, we have deployed internal code updates and protocols that greatly improved the inner workings of our product. It’s important to keep in mind that while these kinds of projects may never be public, they vastly improve the way your team works on a daily basis.

Establish rules of play. Our team is very clear about what “Friday Projects” are for. It’s not a “hackathon” where we build whatever we want, and most importantly, pursuing our own projects doesn’t free us from our normal roles. If a project conflicts with something in another department, we run it by that department first. If a new feature idea is a little quirky, we make sure to get the product owners’ blessing before investing any work time on it. Our Friday Projects have been successful because of rules and boundaries, not despite them. Keep this in mind as your teams experiment with unstructured time.
Measure success. Passion projects offer the intrinsic reward of launching something you love, but celebrating the birth of an idea is only the beginning. New features, ideas or updates that created during your version of “recess” should be measured and analyzed just like any on-the-clock project. This legitimizes the work accomplished during this period, but also prolongs the rush of launching something new — now your team can celebrate every new milestone that occurs.

It’s easy to see why we haven’t looked to the playground sooner as a way to inspire teams. From the outside, recess looks like unregulated chaos or play for the sake of play. But in reality, this break allows a peer group to take a mental and physical break from the task at hand and helps them reset their brains for the next long sprint of work. They make new connections and may bring a new idea or two with them to the next project.



Friday Projects have improved our product and morale. It’s a tradition the team looks forward to, and also serves as a great perk to brag about when trying to lure new team members.

Given the low overhead cost, unstructured time has the potential to deliver impressive ROI. It’s just a matter of imagining what incredible things your team can accomplish during “recess.”

Oskar Konstantyner is a Product Owner and Team Lead at Templafy, focusing on document creation, external services integrations, compliance and process automation features


This chart shows GDP per hour worked in selected countries in 2018.  Photo: Statista/IBT 

Figures from the OECD reveal the countries in which the average hour of work contributes the most to GDP.
As our infographic shows, no matter how hard the average worker in Chile works, they won't be as productive (in GDP terms) as the average person toiling away in Ireland.
An hour's work in the South American country contributed $29.0 to the economy while in Ireland this contribution is on average $102.3.