Coronavirus bombshell: How UK wildlife could thrive in Chernobyl-style U-turn
CORONAVIRUS could see the wildlife in the UK thrive following a lockdown, in a similar scenario seen decades after the terrible disaster at Chernobyl, experts have told Express.co.uk.
By CALLUM HOARE Mar 19,2020
COVID-19 has now infected a quarter-of-a-million people worldwide, claiming the lives of more than 9,000 in the process. But, as the UK looks poised to head into lockdown, following the likes of Spain, France, Germany and Italy, some unexpected benefits could be on the horizon. Videos on social media have surfaced this week showing canals in Venice flowing with clear water, with reports that scores of fish and swans have returned as a result of the decline in tourist activity.
Martin Fowlie, from the RSPB, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, says he is hoping to see a similar impact in the UK.
He told Express.co.uk: “I’ve seen what’s happened in Venice and we’ve been thinking about what that means in the UK as well for wildlife.
“We are some weeks behind Italy, but I imagine there will be some things that will happen that will have an effect on wildlife and the changes we will see.
“Since World War 2, UK wildlife has been in general decline, there are some species doing better, but on the whole, the majority of species have been doing less well.
Coronavirus lockdown could see wildlife thrive (Image: GETTY)
The water in Venice canals is clearing up (Image: GETTY)
I imagine there will be some things that will happen that will have an effect on wildlife and the changes we will see
Martin Fowlie, RSPB
“I’ve been out at the RSPB’s headquarters this week and walking around the reserve at lunchtime – it’s obvious that Spring is in the air, insects are out and birds are singing.
“I guess over the coming days, weeks and months while restrictions of people’s movements are increased, it may mean that fewer people are getting access to the countryside.”
Mr Fowlie says that a lockdown will mean less disturbance for wildlife in their natural habitat, which could allow it to thrive, while also allowing the nation to reassess their relationship with nature.
He added: “That might lead to less disturbance – people don’t do it on purpose – but wildlife will be on its own, so it could mean ground-nesting birds have a more successful season.
“Closer to home there seems to be a whole movement on social media about reconnecting with nature in your garden or outside of your window, so that reconnection might lead to a greater appreciation of our natural world and a desire to do more for it.
The RSPB ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS
hopes birds will flourish (Image: GETTY)
Coronavirus: How village 'self-isolated' to save UK cities from plague
“We know for a lot of people that garden birds are incredibly important connection, people spend millions feeding birds and I think that will become really important to a lot of people over the coming days, weeks and months.
“We are really keen at the RSPB to help people share those daily connections with nature and to help them think of things they can do in their back garden to help.
“While this is a really difficult time for all of us, nature and wildlife could really give us some solace and escape from what’s happening.”
In 1986, the Chernobyl disaster rocked the world.
A nuclear reactor at the Chernobyl Power Plant malfunction in the city of Pripyat, Ukraine, leading to the worst nuclear disaster in history and the evacuation of hundreds of thousands of people in the nearby area.
The Chernobyl disaster has allowed animals to thrive (Image: GETTY)
But, deserted for decades, the city became a haven for wildlife as existing animal populations multiplied and rare species not seen for centuries returned, including lynx, wild boars, wolves, brown bears, bison and owls.
While it is unlikely we will see the return of rare or new species, Mr Fowlie does think it is possible we could see a change in populations as a result.
He added: “I think Chernobyl is a very individual case, obviously all people were removed for a long period of time, decades, and people are very interested to see what happens when people are removed completely.
“This will be different in the UK as we are not taking people out of towns and villages, but we may well see some sort of differences in wildlife over time.
“The key thing is to get people to keep an eye out for the changes of the seasons, in the next few weeks we will have birds arriving back from Africa, we will have swallows by the end of April, we will have swifts coming back, these are things that people use to mark the passage of time.
The wildlife in the area is thriving (Image: GETTY)
The area has since become a conservation (Image: GETTY)
“It will be interesting what changes we see, but I think the Chernobyl situation is different.”
Professor Tim Birkhead, a zoologist from the University of Sheffield agrees, and he hopes the UK will see environmental impacts, too.
He told Express.co.uk: “Wildlife may benefit from the reduced human activity associated with COVID-19.
“As was very clear following the UK foot and mouth outbreak in 2001, when very few people visited the countryside, birds were found breeding in areas they had previously avoided, almost certainly because of reduced human disturbance.
“The same may be true of COVID-19, although it is unclear at present whether human movement in rural areas will be restricted in the same way."
Coronavirus: 8,000 deaths would be ‘remarkable’ says Vallance
But, Professor Birkhead also hopes this pandemic will force Britons, and citizens across the world, to think about their actions.
He added: "I doubt whether we'll see much of a boost in wildlife as a result of the lockdown, but it is difficult to predict what the wildlife consequences might be.
“Most of all, I suspect that COVID-19 will – I hope – cause us to reassess our relationships, both with each other, but critically, with the natural world.
“The virus seems to have originated from a live animal market in China.
“This pandemic reflects our broken relationship with the natural world.”
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Thursday, April 02, 2020
FLASH BACK ONE WEEK AGO
My enemies want me to keep the country closed so I lose the election: Donald Trump claims 'fake news' is pushing need to lockdown in the face of coronavirus out of hatred of him
President Donald Trump complained the 'fake news' wants him to keep the economy shut down so he loses re-election this fall
'The media would like to see me do poorly in an election,' he said at the daily White House coronavirus briefing
President Trump has grown visibly frustrated with stories critical of his administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic
By EMILY GOODIN, SENIOR U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.
25 March, 2020
President Donald Trump on Wednesday complained the 'fake news' wants him to keep the economy shut down so he loses re-election this fall.
'The media would like to see me do poorly in an election,' he said at the daily White House coronavirus briefing.
President Trump repeatedly refers to news stories he doesn't like or are unflattering to his administration as 'fake news' and he has grown visibly frustrated with stories critical of his administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic. The White House has come under fire for the lack of surgical masks and ventilators needed by health care professionals.
President Donald Trump complained the 'fake news' wants him to keep the economy shut down so he loses re-election this fall
Trump calls out 'fake news' for politicizing coronavirus response
Additionally, the president has advocated reopening businesses by Easter Sunday to help the tanking U.S. economy but several medical experts have cautioned that could be too early to stop the spread of the coronavirus.
Trump complained about the media several times on Wednesday, both in his briefing and on Twitter even as he tweeted he was too busy in meetings for this.
'I have been packed all day with meetings, I have no time for stupidity. We’re working around the clock to KEEP AMERICA SAFE!,' he wrote.
And he snapped back at a reporter who asked him about the issue.
'I think there are certain people who would like it not to open so quickly and they think that would be very good as far as defeating me at the polls,' he told CBS' Paula Reid in response to her question.
'There are people in your profession that would like that to happen. I think it's very clear -- I think it's very clear that there are people in your profession that write fake news,' he told her. 'You do.'
President Trump has staked his re-election bid on a strong U.S. economy. But the stock market tanked after business shut down and people stayed home to avoid spreading the coronavirus. The market wiped out all the gains made since Trump took office.
Additionally some experts have predicted the U.S. could see 20 per cent or 30 per cent unemployment as part of the fallout.
Trump defended his administration's response to the coronavirus. His team came under fire early on for not responding aggressively enough and for not getting enough medical supplies to hard-hit areas of infection.
'They would love to see me for whatever reason because we've done one hell of a job,' he said, adding on to his complaints about the media. 'Nobody's done the job we've done, and it's lucky you have this group here for this problem or you wouldn't even have a country left.'
Before he went before the cameras at his daily briefing, Trump fired off a tweet to complain about his press coverage.
'The LameStream Media is the dominant force in trying to get me to keep our Country closed as long as possible in the hope that it will be detrimental to my election success. The real people want to get back to work ASAP. We will be stronger than ever before!,' he wrote.
Trump on Tuesday went all in on having Easter as the deadline to reopen the country's economy, calling it a 'beautiful time,' although he declined to name what kind of data he'd be looking at to make a decision.
He said the Easter deadline - which is April 12, in nineteen days - was his idea.
'I thought it was a beautiful time. A beautiful timeline,' he said at his daily White House briefing on the coronavirus outbreak.
But he didn't answer when asked what kind of data he based his decision on.
'It was based on a certain level of weeks from time we started and it happened to arrive, we were thinking of terms of sooner. I'd love to see it come sooner,' President Trump said.
The president, however, appeared to temper those words on Wednesday, saying he wouldn't make hasty decision and would consult with Dr. Tony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Deborah Birx, who is coordinating the day-to-day response on the coronavirus.
'I'm not going to do anything rash or hastily,' he said.
He warned some areas of the country that are battling high rates of infection would likely stay under stricter guidelines.
'People want to get back to work. I get it from both sides in all fairness and maybe it's a combination of both - Tony said before, combination of both is sometimes very good but there are areas that possibly they won't qualify and there are other areas where they qualify almost now. We will have to see what happens but it will be an interesting period of time. I would like to get our country back,' he said.
President Trump has grown visibly frustrated with stories critical of his administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic
President Trump has been clear he's worried about the economic affect coming from all the businesses being shuttered because of the pandemic. Numerous states have closed restaurants, gyms, bars, and clubs. The hospitality industry has been hit hard by the pandemic. States like California and New York have advised people to stay home as much as possible.
A decision on the matter is expected early next week, which would mark the end of the '15 Days to Slow the Spread' recommendations released last week.
Those guidelines recommended no gatherings over 10 people along with eating take out and not going to bars.
My enemies want me to keep the country closed so I lose the election: Donald Trump claims 'fake news' is pushing need to lockdown in the face of coronavirus out of hatred of him
President Donald Trump complained the 'fake news' wants him to keep the economy shut down so he loses re-election this fall
'The media would like to see me do poorly in an election,' he said at the daily White House coronavirus briefing
President Trump has grown visibly frustrated with stories critical of his administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic
By EMILY GOODIN, SENIOR U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.
25 March, 2020
President Donald Trump on Wednesday complained the 'fake news' wants him to keep the economy shut down so he loses re-election this fall.
'The media would like to see me do poorly in an election,' he said at the daily White House coronavirus briefing.
President Trump repeatedly refers to news stories he doesn't like or are unflattering to his administration as 'fake news' and he has grown visibly frustrated with stories critical of his administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic. The White House has come under fire for the lack of surgical masks and ventilators needed by health care professionals.
President Donald Trump complained the 'fake news' wants him to keep the economy shut down so he loses re-election this fall
Trump calls out 'fake news' for politicizing coronavirus response
Additionally, the president has advocated reopening businesses by Easter Sunday to help the tanking U.S. economy but several medical experts have cautioned that could be too early to stop the spread of the coronavirus.
Trump complained about the media several times on Wednesday, both in his briefing and on Twitter even as he tweeted he was too busy in meetings for this.
'I have been packed all day with meetings, I have no time for stupidity. We’re working around the clock to KEEP AMERICA SAFE!,' he wrote.
And he snapped back at a reporter who asked him about the issue.
'I think there are certain people who would like it not to open so quickly and they think that would be very good as far as defeating me at the polls,' he told CBS' Paula Reid in response to her question.
'There are people in your profession that would like that to happen. I think it's very clear -- I think it's very clear that there are people in your profession that write fake news,' he told her. 'You do.'
President Trump has staked his re-election bid on a strong U.S. economy. But the stock market tanked after business shut down and people stayed home to avoid spreading the coronavirus. The market wiped out all the gains made since Trump took office.
Additionally some experts have predicted the U.S. could see 20 per cent or 30 per cent unemployment as part of the fallout.
Trump defended his administration's response to the coronavirus. His team came under fire early on for not responding aggressively enough and for not getting enough medical supplies to hard-hit areas of infection.
'They would love to see me for whatever reason because we've done one hell of a job,' he said, adding on to his complaints about the media. 'Nobody's done the job we've done, and it's lucky you have this group here for this problem or you wouldn't even have a country left.'
Before he went before the cameras at his daily briefing, Trump fired off a tweet to complain about his press coverage.
'The LameStream Media is the dominant force in trying to get me to keep our Country closed as long as possible in the hope that it will be detrimental to my election success. The real people want to get back to work ASAP. We will be stronger than ever before!,' he wrote.
Trump on Tuesday went all in on having Easter as the deadline to reopen the country's economy, calling it a 'beautiful time,' although he declined to name what kind of data he'd be looking at to make a decision.
He said the Easter deadline - which is April 12, in nineteen days - was his idea.
'I thought it was a beautiful time. A beautiful timeline,' he said at his daily White House briefing on the coronavirus outbreak.
But he didn't answer when asked what kind of data he based his decision on.
'It was based on a certain level of weeks from time we started and it happened to arrive, we were thinking of terms of sooner. I'd love to see it come sooner,' President Trump said.
The president, however, appeared to temper those words on Wednesday, saying he wouldn't make hasty decision and would consult with Dr. Tony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Deborah Birx, who is coordinating the day-to-day response on the coronavirus.
'I'm not going to do anything rash or hastily,' he said.
He warned some areas of the country that are battling high rates of infection would likely stay under stricter guidelines.
'People want to get back to work. I get it from both sides in all fairness and maybe it's a combination of both - Tony said before, combination of both is sometimes very good but there are areas that possibly they won't qualify and there are other areas where they qualify almost now. We will have to see what happens but it will be an interesting period of time. I would like to get our country back,' he said.
President Trump has grown visibly frustrated with stories critical of his administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic
President Trump has been clear he's worried about the economic affect coming from all the businesses being shuttered because of the pandemic. Numerous states have closed restaurants, gyms, bars, and clubs. The hospitality industry has been hit hard by the pandemic. States like California and New York have advised people to stay home as much as possible.
A decision on the matter is expected early next week, which would mark the end of the '15 Days to Slow the Spread' recommendations released last week.
Those guidelines recommended no gatherings over 10 people along with eating take out and not going to bars.
Dozens of Amazon employees walked out of their overnight shift at a Chicago delivery station
Monday night in protest of Amazon’s refusal to shut down their building for disinfection after a worker there tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
Athena Coalition
MARCH 31, 2020
“We want to work — this is not about Amazonians being lazy,” said one of the Amazon employees during a picket line outside the Chicago building. “We want to work! We want to work in a clean facility! We want to work where we're going to be safe, our kids are going to be safe, our families are going to be safe. How can we be essential workers, but our lives are not essential?”
"How can we be essential workers, but our lives are not essential?”
The Chicago employees said Amazon should temporarily close their facility, and want an explanation of what the company’s so-called enhanced cleaning actually entails — demands that are being echoed by employees at other Amazon facilities in New York, New Jersey, and beyond.
The Chicago employees, members of a group called DCH1 Amazonians United, allege that Amazon management didn’t inform workers about the infected worker until multiple shifts had cycled through the building, which they said in a petition “put many of us at risk of infection without our knowledge or consent.”
Ted Miin, a worker with the group, told BuzzFeed News that more than half of the night shift staff refused to work last night in protest.
In a statement, an Amazon spokesperson said, “these accusations are simply unfounded.”
“Of the over 600 employees at our Chicago delivery station, a small group participated in today’s demonstration,” the spokesperson told BuzzFeed News.
Amazon management made similar claims about an employee walkout at one of its New York facilities Monday. While organizers who were there said more than 50 employees walked out in protest of unsafe working conditions in Staten Island, Amazon Senior Vice President Dave Clark claimed that only 15 employees participated in the demonstration, saying on Twitter, “Today's ‘strike’ headlines are dramatically exaggerated.”
Video of the event shot by members of Amazonians United New York City showed dozens of people in the facility’s parking lot, although it was unclear how many of those pictured were participating in the walkout.
“Of the more 5,000 employees at our Staten Island site, 15 people — less than half a percent of associates — participated in today’s demonstration," an Amazon spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. “The truth is the vast majority of employees continue to show up and do the heroic work of delivering for customers every day.”
Athena Coalition
Following the Staten Island walkout, Amazon fired an employee who participated named Chris Smalls. The company said Smalls was repeatedly warned not to violate quarantine procedure by reporting to the warehouse, but did so anyway.
“Despite that instruction to stay home with pay, he came onsite today, March 30, further putting the teams at risk,” the company said in a statement. “This is unacceptable and we have terminated his employment as a result of these multiple safety issues.”
Smalls said Amazon violated his rights by retaliating against him for his efforts to improve working conditions. “I stood with my co-workers because conditions at JFK8 are legitimately dangerous for workers and the public,” he said in an emailed statement. “We won’t stop until Amazon provides real protections for our health and safety and clarity for everybody about what it is doing to keep people safe in the middle of the worst pandemic of our lifetimes.”
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has said the city’s Commission on Human Rights will investigate Smalls' firing, and Smalls said he plans to file a charge with the National Labor Relations Board. New York state Attorney General Letitia James is encouraging the agency to investigate.
“It is disgraceful that Amazon would terminate an employee who bravely stood up to protect himself and his colleagues,” James said in a statement. “In New York, the right to organize is codified into law, and any retaliatory action by management related thereto is strictly prohibited. At a time when so many New Yorkers are struggling and are deeply concerned about their safety, this action was also immoral and inhumane.”
"They just set up fever stations last night, a few weeks late if you ask me."
Amazon employees in Chicago and New York have been organizing around workplace issues for months, and the coronavirus pandemic has employees at other facilities watching their activity closely. On March 18, Amazon employees at a warehouse in Queens refused to work their shift after learning an employee had tested positive for the coronavirus. Almost two weeks later, employees throughout Amazon’s massive logistics network are making similar complaints.
BuzzFeed News reported the first COVID-19 infection at an Amazon fulfillment center in Edison, New Jersey, on March 25. On Monday, an employee at that facility who requested anonymity to protect his job said he’d heard from supervisors that additional workers had tested positive, but that Amazon had not informed staff. So far, he said that at least 16 employees in Edison had been asked by management to quarantine at home, but Amazon has not closed the facility for cleaning. He also said the cleaning Amazon is doing seems inadequate.
“No one is cleaning the workstations,” he told BuzzFeed News. “We have elevators where employees send the totes and empty pallets … No one is cleaning the elevators or the buttons on the elevators.”
“The responsible thing for them to do would be to close the plant for a couple days and sanitize the workstations,” he continued.
A different anonymous worker from Robbinsville, New Jersey, who reached out to BuzzFeed News said his facility had at least two confirmed cases of COVID-19. Employees there also wondered why Amazon wouldn't close their workplace for cleaning.
“The facilities [are] not really as sanitized as they should be. You’re still around a bunch of people you can catch the virus from,” this employee told BuzzFeed News. “Me and other coworkers feel like they should at least shut down the building for a few days while they sanitize the place."
Greg Krisher, an employee at a facility near Detroit, said he first heard about infected employees at his warehouse from social media and the news. "I feel they tried to sweep it under the rug," Krisher told BuzzFeed News. He said coworkers were considering organizing a walkout, but news of the firing in Staten Island stalled those plans. They've also circulated petitions about coronavirus protections, and filed a complaint with the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration, he said.
“They just set up fever stations last night, a few weeks late if you ask me,” said Krisher. “They do not supply any [personal protective equipment], just some cloth gloves. One wipe of Lysol to clean your station. Then to show how serious they are, they are doing [write] ups for violating social distancing. [If] you have [ever] been in the back part of amazon, you will see that is not really [an] option.”
Do you have questions you want answered? You can always get in touch. And if you're someone who is seeing the impact of this firsthand, we’d also love to hear from you (you can reach out to us via one of our tip line channels).
Amazon said it's rolling out temperature checks at facilities starting in Seattle and New York. Last Wednesday, the company said it is "following guidelines from local officials and are taking extreme measures to ensure the safety of employees at our site" in Edison. The company didn’t immediately respond to questions about the Robbinsville or Michigan facilities.
The concerns of workers in New Jersey and Michigan are echoed in complaints from workers in Chicago, who said in their petition that Amazon’s claims of “enhanced cleaning” weren't reflected in what they saw at work.
“We have seen cleaners using nonapproved cleaning products, the same rags over and over, and only wiping down basic surfaces at the warehouse,” the workers wrote. “Most areas in the warehouse are not disinfected, like in the cells, the belts, dock areas, and of course all of the packages.”
Many of Amazon’s buildings operate 24 hours a day, which employees said make them impossible to fully disinfect.
“No amount of ‘enhanced cleaning’ is effective while associates are still working throughout the warehouse transferring around possible contamination,” the petition said, which is why they’re demanding Amazon “shut down the warehouse immediately, with pay, for thorough disinfection of the entire facility.”
An Amazon spokesperson said it is "auditing daily the processes we put into place to protect our teams and have deployed an additional 450,000+ canisters of disinfectant wipes (45 million additional wipes), 50K+ hand sanitizers and 20K+ wall mounted sanitizer refill containers to our sites in addition to other cleaning materials that were on-hand." The spokesperson also said it now has three times the usual number of janitorial workers in its facilities. Amazon employs more than 800,000 people worldwide.
Earlier this month, Sens. Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Sherrod Brown wrote a public letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos asking for details on how the company planned to protect and compensate the thousands of employees it has repeatedly referred to as heroes. On March 22, Amazon Vice President Brian Huseman responded by saying that the company was keeping facilities open, but “tripling down on deep cleaning, procuring safety supplies that are available, and changing policies and processes to ensure that those in our buildings are keeping safe distances.”
On Friday, Brown noted that Amazon’s letter didn’t address why some facilities where employees had tested positive have been closed — like the one in Kentucky — while others remain operational. Brown told BuzzFeed news that the company “needs to be willing to take whatever measures are needed to prevent the spread of coronavirus in its facilities — including the options of temporarily closing them to sanitize them.”
"We are demoralized by the fact that our managers aren't next to us, and the company doesn’t appear to care about protecting us."
As the number of Amazon employees with COVID-19 increases and fear spreads along with the disease, more employees are staying home from work, disrupting Amazon’s systems. The company is no longer fulfilling shipments for sellers of nonessential items, and customers are seeing delivery dates months in the future for items that would normally ship within a week. To keep packages moving, Amazon is scrambling to hire 100,000 new employees.
The anonymous employee in Edison said his building typically moved 270,000 packages a day, but was now averaging closer to 125,000. On Saturday, when a single shift would normally have between 8 and 10 managers, he said just one manager was on duty. And he said, because of staffing issues, management asked him to move between multiple workstations, which “increases exposure.”
During a recent shift, he said he was moved to a new task and had already started working when workers nearby told him that the previous person assigned there had been sent home sick. After he confronted his supervisor about it, he was provided with wipes to clean the station.
“Why couldn’t they just tell me, and let me clean the station?” he said. “Why would you shut up about something like that?”
He said while he doesn’t want to hurt the company, he felt its approach to the pandemic has been “deceptive.”
“We have good morale in terms of wanting to help people, but we are demoralized by the fact that our managers aren't next to us, and the company doesn’t appear to care about protecting us,” he said. “Health care workers have protections in place for them, police have protections in place to protect them. We have nothing.”
MORE ON THIS
Amazon Said That During The Pandemic, Sales Are Soaring. Workers Say They Feel Unsafe.
Caroline O'Donovan · March 16, 2020
Amazon Is Scrambling To Improve Warehouse Safety Following Employee Outcry
Caroline O'Donovan · March 18, 2020
Amazon Warehouse Workers Who Demanded Paid Time Off Just Got It
Caroline O'Donovan · March 23, 2020
Senators Are Calling For Better Protections For Delivery Workers During The Coronavirus Pandemic
Caroline O'Donovan · March 25, 2020
The Coronavirus Is Continuing To Spread Through Amazon's Facilities
Caroline O'Donovan · March 25, 2020
Caroline O'Donovan is a senior technology reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
Monday night in protest of Amazon’s refusal to shut down their building for disinfection after a worker there tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
Athena Coalition
MARCH 31, 2020
“We want to work — this is not about Amazonians being lazy,” said one of the Amazon employees during a picket line outside the Chicago building. “We want to work! We want to work in a clean facility! We want to work where we're going to be safe, our kids are going to be safe, our families are going to be safe. How can we be essential workers, but our lives are not essential?”
"How can we be essential workers, but our lives are not essential?”
The Chicago employees said Amazon should temporarily close their facility, and want an explanation of what the company’s so-called enhanced cleaning actually entails — demands that are being echoed by employees at other Amazon facilities in New York, New Jersey, and beyond.
The Chicago employees, members of a group called DCH1 Amazonians United, allege that Amazon management didn’t inform workers about the infected worker until multiple shifts had cycled through the building, which they said in a petition “put many of us at risk of infection without our knowledge or consent.”
Ted Miin, a worker with the group, told BuzzFeed News that more than half of the night shift staff refused to work last night in protest.
In a statement, an Amazon spokesperson said, “these accusations are simply unfounded.”
“Of the over 600 employees at our Chicago delivery station, a small group participated in today’s demonstration,” the spokesperson told BuzzFeed News.
Amazon management made similar claims about an employee walkout at one of its New York facilities Monday. While organizers who were there said more than 50 employees walked out in protest of unsafe working conditions in Staten Island, Amazon Senior Vice President Dave Clark claimed that only 15 employees participated in the demonstration, saying on Twitter, “Today's ‘strike’ headlines are dramatically exaggerated.”
Video of the event shot by members of Amazonians United New York City showed dozens of people in the facility’s parking lot, although it was unclear how many of those pictured were participating in the walkout.
“Of the more 5,000 employees at our Staten Island site, 15 people — less than half a percent of associates — participated in today’s demonstration," an Amazon spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. “The truth is the vast majority of employees continue to show up and do the heroic work of delivering for customers every day.”
Athena Coalition
Following the Staten Island walkout, Amazon fired an employee who participated named Chris Smalls. The company said Smalls was repeatedly warned not to violate quarantine procedure by reporting to the warehouse, but did so anyway.
“Despite that instruction to stay home with pay, he came onsite today, March 30, further putting the teams at risk,” the company said in a statement. “This is unacceptable and we have terminated his employment as a result of these multiple safety issues.”
Smalls said Amazon violated his rights by retaliating against him for his efforts to improve working conditions. “I stood with my co-workers because conditions at JFK8 are legitimately dangerous for workers and the public,” he said in an emailed statement. “We won’t stop until Amazon provides real protections for our health and safety and clarity for everybody about what it is doing to keep people safe in the middle of the worst pandemic of our lifetimes.”
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has said the city’s Commission on Human Rights will investigate Smalls' firing, and Smalls said he plans to file a charge with the National Labor Relations Board. New York state Attorney General Letitia James is encouraging the agency to investigate.
“It is disgraceful that Amazon would terminate an employee who bravely stood up to protect himself and his colleagues,” James said in a statement. “In New York, the right to organize is codified into law, and any retaliatory action by management related thereto is strictly prohibited. At a time when so many New Yorkers are struggling and are deeply concerned about their safety, this action was also immoral and inhumane.”
"They just set up fever stations last night, a few weeks late if you ask me."
Amazon employees in Chicago and New York have been organizing around workplace issues for months, and the coronavirus pandemic has employees at other facilities watching their activity closely. On March 18, Amazon employees at a warehouse in Queens refused to work their shift after learning an employee had tested positive for the coronavirus. Almost two weeks later, employees throughout Amazon’s massive logistics network are making similar complaints.
BuzzFeed News reported the first COVID-19 infection at an Amazon fulfillment center in Edison, New Jersey, on March 25. On Monday, an employee at that facility who requested anonymity to protect his job said he’d heard from supervisors that additional workers had tested positive, but that Amazon had not informed staff. So far, he said that at least 16 employees in Edison had been asked by management to quarantine at home, but Amazon has not closed the facility for cleaning. He also said the cleaning Amazon is doing seems inadequate.
“No one is cleaning the workstations,” he told BuzzFeed News. “We have elevators where employees send the totes and empty pallets … No one is cleaning the elevators or the buttons on the elevators.”
“The responsible thing for them to do would be to close the plant for a couple days and sanitize the workstations,” he continued.
A different anonymous worker from Robbinsville, New Jersey, who reached out to BuzzFeed News said his facility had at least two confirmed cases of COVID-19. Employees there also wondered why Amazon wouldn't close their workplace for cleaning.
“The facilities [are] not really as sanitized as they should be. You’re still around a bunch of people you can catch the virus from,” this employee told BuzzFeed News. “Me and other coworkers feel like they should at least shut down the building for a few days while they sanitize the place."
Greg Krisher, an employee at a facility near Detroit, said he first heard about infected employees at his warehouse from social media and the news. "I feel they tried to sweep it under the rug," Krisher told BuzzFeed News. He said coworkers were considering organizing a walkout, but news of the firing in Staten Island stalled those plans. They've also circulated petitions about coronavirus protections, and filed a complaint with the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration, he said.
“They just set up fever stations last night, a few weeks late if you ask me,” said Krisher. “They do not supply any [personal protective equipment], just some cloth gloves. One wipe of Lysol to clean your station. Then to show how serious they are, they are doing [write] ups for violating social distancing. [If] you have [ever] been in the back part of amazon, you will see that is not really [an] option.”
Do you have questions you want answered? You can always get in touch. And if you're someone who is seeing the impact of this firsthand, we’d also love to hear from you (you can reach out to us via one of our tip line channels).
Amazon said it's rolling out temperature checks at facilities starting in Seattle and New York. Last Wednesday, the company said it is "following guidelines from local officials and are taking extreme measures to ensure the safety of employees at our site" in Edison. The company didn’t immediately respond to questions about the Robbinsville or Michigan facilities.
The concerns of workers in New Jersey and Michigan are echoed in complaints from workers in Chicago, who said in their petition that Amazon’s claims of “enhanced cleaning” weren't reflected in what they saw at work.
“We have seen cleaners using nonapproved cleaning products, the same rags over and over, and only wiping down basic surfaces at the warehouse,” the workers wrote. “Most areas in the warehouse are not disinfected, like in the cells, the belts, dock areas, and of course all of the packages.”
Many of Amazon’s buildings operate 24 hours a day, which employees said make them impossible to fully disinfect.
“No amount of ‘enhanced cleaning’ is effective while associates are still working throughout the warehouse transferring around possible contamination,” the petition said, which is why they’re demanding Amazon “shut down the warehouse immediately, with pay, for thorough disinfection of the entire facility.”
An Amazon spokesperson said it is "auditing daily the processes we put into place to protect our teams and have deployed an additional 450,000+ canisters of disinfectant wipes (45 million additional wipes), 50K+ hand sanitizers and 20K+ wall mounted sanitizer refill containers to our sites in addition to other cleaning materials that were on-hand." The spokesperson also said it now has three times the usual number of janitorial workers in its facilities. Amazon employs more than 800,000 people worldwide.
Earlier this month, Sens. Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Sherrod Brown wrote a public letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos asking for details on how the company planned to protect and compensate the thousands of employees it has repeatedly referred to as heroes. On March 22, Amazon Vice President Brian Huseman responded by saying that the company was keeping facilities open, but “tripling down on deep cleaning, procuring safety supplies that are available, and changing policies and processes to ensure that those in our buildings are keeping safe distances.”
On Friday, Brown noted that Amazon’s letter didn’t address why some facilities where employees had tested positive have been closed — like the one in Kentucky — while others remain operational. Brown told BuzzFeed news that the company “needs to be willing to take whatever measures are needed to prevent the spread of coronavirus in its facilities — including the options of temporarily closing them to sanitize them.”
"We are demoralized by the fact that our managers aren't next to us, and the company doesn’t appear to care about protecting us."
As the number of Amazon employees with COVID-19 increases and fear spreads along with the disease, more employees are staying home from work, disrupting Amazon’s systems. The company is no longer fulfilling shipments for sellers of nonessential items, and customers are seeing delivery dates months in the future for items that would normally ship within a week. To keep packages moving, Amazon is scrambling to hire 100,000 new employees.
The anonymous employee in Edison said his building typically moved 270,000 packages a day, but was now averaging closer to 125,000. On Saturday, when a single shift would normally have between 8 and 10 managers, he said just one manager was on duty. And he said, because of staffing issues, management asked him to move between multiple workstations, which “increases exposure.”
During a recent shift, he said he was moved to a new task and had already started working when workers nearby told him that the previous person assigned there had been sent home sick. After he confronted his supervisor about it, he was provided with wipes to clean the station.
“Why couldn’t they just tell me, and let me clean the station?” he said. “Why would you shut up about something like that?”
He said while he doesn’t want to hurt the company, he felt its approach to the pandemic has been “deceptive.”
“We have good morale in terms of wanting to help people, but we are demoralized by the fact that our managers aren't next to us, and the company doesn’t appear to care about protecting us,” he said. “Health care workers have protections in place for them, police have protections in place to protect them. We have nothing.”
Amazon Said That During The Pandemic, Sales Are Soaring. Workers Say They Feel Unsafe.
Caroline O'Donovan · March 16, 2020
Amazon Is Scrambling To Improve Warehouse Safety Following Employee Outcry
Caroline O'Donovan · March 18, 2020
Amazon Warehouse Workers Who Demanded Paid Time Off Just Got It
Caroline O'Donovan · March 23, 2020
Senators Are Calling For Better Protections For Delivery Workers During The Coronavirus Pandemic
Caroline O'Donovan · March 25, 2020
The Coronavirus Is Continuing To Spread Through Amazon's Facilities
Caroline O'Donovan · March 25, 2020
Caroline O'Donovan is a senior technology reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
Feds ‘Likely Did Not Have Enough’ Protective Gear Stockpiled
Patty Hajdu (LIBERAL MP) Cabinet Minister
Successive federal governments haven't spent enough preparing for public-health crises, she said.
LIBERAL GOVERNMENT 1999-2006
HARPER CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT 2006-2015
ONLY GOVERNMENTS WE HAVE HAD
Jim Bronskill Canadian Press 04/01/2020
ADRIAN WYLD/CP
Health Minister Patty Hajdu listens to a translation aid
during a news conference in Ottawa on April 1, 2020.
OTTAWA — The federal government likely did not have enough protective equipment in its emergency stockpile to meet needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, Health Minister Patty Hajdu acknowledges.
Successive governments in Ottawa have not spent enough money preparing for public-health crises, Hajdu told a news conference Wednesday.
Federal officials are now working hard to procure scarce equipment such as surgical masks at a time when governments everywhere are scrambling to do the same, she said.
“We likely did not have enough. I think federal governments for decades have been underfunding things like public-health preparedness, and I would say that obviously governments all across the world are in the same exact situation,” Hajdu said.
‘We are pulling out all the stops’
“It is an extremely competitive space right now for personal protective equipment. We are pulling out all of the stops ... trying to procure equipment in a global situation where equipment is extremely tight.”
Hajdu also signalled there are lessons to be acted on after the pandemic.
“This is an opportunity for all governments to consider reinvesting in public health and preparedness, and I look forward to those conversations on the other end of this.”
Canada’s National Emergency Strategic Stockpile has supplies that provinces and territories can request in emergencies, such as infectious disease outbreaks and natural disasters, when their own resources fall short.
The stockpile’s roots can be traced to the early 1950s, an element of the federal government’s Cold War civil-defence plan.
The emergency stockpile is in a central depot in the national-capital region and warehouses strategically located across Canada.
The Public Health Agency of Canada is responsible for maintaining the stockpile, continuously assessing its contents and refurbishing the supplies.
The government says the agency has released items from the strategic stockpile in support of provincial and territorial COVID-19 response efforts.
This has included personal protective equipment such as surgical masks, gloves and N95 respirators, as well as other items including disinfectant and hand sanitizer.
The government says it is working to enhance its stock of supplies to support provincial requests or those from other federal partners who may also be in need of equipment.
Hajdu’s admission that the national emergency stockpile may have been inadequate for the current crisis is important “to ensure that we learn immediate lessons” and do not mislead Canadians about the extent of the supply problem, said Wesley Wark, a visiting professor at the University of Ottawa’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.
The strategic stockpile was designed to ensure a surge capacity to meet a health crisis and to provide a stop-gap, buying time for other sources and new manufacturing capability to come online.
But it appears the stockpile has failed in that mission due to underfunding, lack of attention or poor inventory, he said. “Now we are racing against the clock.”
Provincial and territorial governments and hospitals throughout the country need to know the extent to which they can count on the national stockpile for emergency assistance, Wark said.
“Transparency is vital. Knee-jerk secrecy has to be discarded.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 1, 2020.
Patty Hajdu (LIBERAL MP) Cabinet Minister
Successive federal governments haven't spent enough preparing for public-health crises, she said.
LIBERAL GOVERNMENT 1999-2006
HARPER CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT 2006-2015
ONLY GOVERNMENTS WE HAVE HAD
Jim Bronskill Canadian Press 04/01/2020
ADRIAN WYLD/CP
Health Minister Patty Hajdu listens to a translation aid
during a news conference in Ottawa on April 1, 2020.
OTTAWA — The federal government likely did not have enough protective equipment in its emergency stockpile to meet needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, Health Minister Patty Hajdu acknowledges.
Successive governments in Ottawa have not spent enough money preparing for public-health crises, Hajdu told a news conference Wednesday.
Federal officials are now working hard to procure scarce equipment such as surgical masks at a time when governments everywhere are scrambling to do the same, she said.
“We likely did not have enough. I think federal governments for decades have been underfunding things like public-health preparedness, and I would say that obviously governments all across the world are in the same exact situation,” Hajdu said.
‘We are pulling out all the stops’
“It is an extremely competitive space right now for personal protective equipment. We are pulling out all of the stops ... trying to procure equipment in a global situation where equipment is extremely tight.”
Hajdu also signalled there are lessons to be acted on after the pandemic.
“This is an opportunity for all governments to consider reinvesting in public health and preparedness, and I look forward to those conversations on the other end of this.”
Canada’s National Emergency Strategic Stockpile has supplies that provinces and territories can request in emergencies, such as infectious disease outbreaks and natural disasters, when their own resources fall short.
The stockpile’s roots can be traced to the early 1950s, an element of the federal government’s Cold War civil-defence plan.
The emergency stockpile is in a central depot in the national-capital region and warehouses strategically located across Canada.
The Public Health Agency of Canada is responsible for maintaining the stockpile, continuously assessing its contents and refurbishing the supplies.
The government says the agency has released items from the strategic stockpile in support of provincial and territorial COVID-19 response efforts.
This has included personal protective equipment such as surgical masks, gloves and N95 respirators, as well as other items including disinfectant and hand sanitizer.
The government says it is working to enhance its stock of supplies to support provincial requests or those from other federal partners who may also be in need of equipment.
Hajdu’s admission that the national emergency stockpile may have been inadequate for the current crisis is important “to ensure that we learn immediate lessons” and do not mislead Canadians about the extent of the supply problem, said Wesley Wark, a visiting professor at the University of Ottawa’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.
The strategic stockpile was designed to ensure a surge capacity to meet a health crisis and to provide a stop-gap, buying time for other sources and new manufacturing capability to come online.
But it appears the stockpile has failed in that mission due to underfunding, lack of attention or poor inventory, he said. “Now we are racing against the clock.”
Provincial and territorial governments and hospitals throughout the country need to know the extent to which they can count on the national stockpile for emergency assistance, Wark said.
“Transparency is vital. Knee-jerk secrecy has to be discarded.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 1, 2020.
COVID-19 KILLS KAPITALISM
Other Pandemics Didn't Crash The Economy. This Chart Shows Why COVID-19 Is Different
The novel coronavirus appears to be more contagious than previous outbreaks.
Other Pandemics Didn't Crash The Economy. This Chart Shows Why COVID-19 Is Different
The novel coronavirus appears to be more contagious than previous outbreaks.
The world has survived deadly viruses and other types of pandemics before, but never in modern history has one caused an economic crash anywhere near the sort we are seeing today with the coronavirus crisis.
During the 1918-19 Spanish flu outbreak, the most severe pandemic in recent history, the Dow Jones stock index declined around 10 per cent over more than a year. In this COVID-19 pandemic, it lost more than 30 per cent in a month.
Why is this happening? Why did we have to shut down the economy to deal with COVID-19 when we didn’t have to for SARS in 2003, or the H1N1 pandemic in 2009?
A new report from National Bank of Canada points to an answer: the virus appears to be more contagious than previous pandemics, making it easier for COVID-19 to spread.
The “basic reproduction number” for COVID-19 is nearly 3.5 ― meaning that the average person who contracts it will infect nearly 3.5 other people. That is much higher than the typical flu virus that goes around, or any of the viral pandemics over the past century, which had considerably lower reproduction numbers, as this chart from NBF shows.
“In that context, unprecedented action taken by governments worldwide to shut down the economy, while painful, is understandable,” NBF economist Krishen Rangasamy wrote.
The high contagion rate of the virus may be why the world was caught off guard, and ended up having to lock down borders and order people to stay home to prevent the spread. And the impact of that “unprecedented action” spooked the markets, sending them tumbling from recent record highs ― at a time when many people were already concerned that there was a bubble in the price of stocks and other assets.
If COVID-19 does prove more contagious than others, one possible explanation may have to do with its long incubation period, before sufferers show any symptoms. The science is not yet settled, but it’s possible that people carrying the virus can infect others before showing symptoms.
If so, that’s a huge problem. Because COVID-19′s incubation period seems to be quite long, at least for some people. The current accepted number is two to 14 days, and in some cases, it has been as long as three-and-a-half weeks.
That’s a long time for infected people to walk around, unknowingly spreading the virus, which is why officials have been advising people to stay home and practise social distancing as much as possible.
A new obsession
It all suggests that, until there is a vaccine or a treatment, any future COVID-19 outbreaks may require extraordinary responses from governments.
And it means economists have a new obsession: The “reproduction number” of viruses, or “R0” in scientific notation.
The Juul Executive Who Was Overseeing $1 Billion In Cuts Is Leaving
It’s the latest high-profile departure for the e-cigarette manufacturer.
Stephanie M. LeeBuzzFeed News Reporter
Reporting From San Francisco, California March 31, 2020
Stephanie Keith / Getty Images
SAN FRANCISCO — The executive who was overseeing Juul’s cost-cutting efforts is leaving the e-cigarette startup after less than a year on the job, the latest of several high-profile departures.
Guy Cartwright, the chief transformation officer, is out, according to a staff memo sent Tuesday and obtained by BuzzFeed News.
In the memo, CEO K.C. Crosthwaite said Cartwright had been “instrumental” in the company’s effort to cut $1 billion in costs, which began late last year. That included laying off 650 staffers, or about 16% of the startup’s global workforce.
Crosthwaite said Bob Robbins, who oversees sales in the Americas, would be taking on an “expanded role” and leading the “business model optimization efforts to position the company for long-term success.” The CEO did not explain why Cartwright was leaving.
Cartwright joined the company in July, according to his LinkedIn profile and became the chief financial officer in October before being appointed chief transformation officer in January. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A Juul spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
At the end of 2018, Juul was valued at $38 billion. But since then, the San Francisco startup has been under tremendous pressure to save money, in large part because it faces marketing restrictions in the US and elsewhere that have cut into its sales. Under heavy criticism for allegedly helping fuel the teen vaping crisis in the US, it stopped sales of all its nontobacco flavors and suspended marketing and lobbying in the US late last year. It has also been kicked out of China and banned in India, once hoped to be two of its biggest potential new markets.
Since the fall 2019 layoffs, during which several top executives left, others have followed. Juul cofounder James Monsees left this month. And in February, the company forced out its two executives who oversaw its Europe and south Asia markets and laid off a portion of its staff in its Singapore office.
Juul Is Forcing Out Two Top Executives And Laying Off Global Staff
Stephanie M. Lee · Feb. 25, 2020
Juul Cofounder James Monsees Is Stepping Down
Stephanie M. Lee · March 12, 2020
Juul Employees Say “Morale Is At An All-Time Low” After Its Worst Year Ever
Stephanie M. Lee · Feb. 5, 2020
Stephanie M. Lee is a science reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
A Major Tobacco Company’s $13 Billion Investment In Juul Violates Antitrust Laws, The FTC Said
More than a year after Altria took a one-third stake in Juul, valuing the e-cigarette company at $38 billion, the FTC is seeking to unwind the deal.
Stephanie M. LeeBuzzFeed News Reporter
Reporting From San Francisco, California
April 1, 2020
Stephanie Keith / Getty Images
SAN FRANCISCO — The Federal Trade Commission is suing to undo Altria’s nearly $13 billion investment in the popular e-cigarette maker Juul, alleging that the deal violates antitrust laws.
Altria, one of the world’s largest tobacco manufacturers, paid $12.8 billion in December 2018 for a 35% stake of Juul, becoming its largest stakeholder and valuing the San Francisco startup at $38 billion. The FTC’s complaint, filed Wednesday, alleges that the investment illegally eliminated competition between the two companies.
Altria used to make its own e-cigarettes, under the brands MarkTen and Green Smoke, until December 2018. As competitors, Altria and Juul tracked each other’s e-cigarette prices and “raced to innovate,” the FTC said in a press release.
That race effectively ended by the end of 2018, by which time Juul had become a household name and the most popular e-cigarette maker in the US. The FTC alleged that “Altria dealt with this competitive threat by agreeing not to compete in return for a substantial ownership interest in Juul.”
“Altria and Juul turned from competitors to collaborators by eliminating competition and sharing in Juul’s profits,” Ian Conner, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, said in a statement.
As part of the
investment, Altria would have been able to appoint representatives to Juul’s board of directors and convert its shares to voting securities. But those moves have been on hold as the FTC has been reviewing the investment, the Wall Street Journal reported in January.
In a memo obtained by BuzzFeed News, Juul’s chief legal officer told staff on Wednesday night that the company would be reviewing the complaint.
A Juul spokesperson declined to comment.
Separately, the FTC has been investigating the marketing practices of Juul and other e-cigarette companies. Juul has been widely criticized — and sued by regulators across the country — for allegedly advertising its addictive products to youth and helping start the teen vaping crisis. Juul, for its part, said its goal has always been to help adult smokers quit conventional cigarettes.
Since Altria put money in the startup, its investment has lost value as Juul has struggled to keep its footing. Late last year, Juul stopped sales of all its nontobacco flavors in the US while it’s in the process of asking the FDA to allow it to sell its products. It’s also faced a combination of regulatory restrictions and lackluster sales overseas. It laid off 650 employees in the fall, and over the last two months a series of high-profile executives, including cofounder James Monsees, have left.
Juul’s valuation is now calculated to be $12 billion.
MORE ON THIS
Juul Cofounder James Monsees Is Stepping Down
Stephanie M. Lee · March 12, 2020
Juul Is Forcing Out Two Top Executives And Laying Off Global Staff
Stephanie M. Lee · Feb. 25, 2020
Juul Employees Say “Morale Is At An All-Time Low” After Its Worst Year Ever
Stephanie M. Lee · Feb. 5, 2020
Stephanie M. Lee is a science reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
More than a year after Altria took a one-third stake in Juul, valuing the e-cigarette company at $38 billion, the FTC is seeking to unwind the deal.
Stephanie M. LeeBuzzFeed News Reporter
Reporting From San Francisco, California
April 1, 2020
Stephanie Keith / Getty Images
SAN FRANCISCO — The Federal Trade Commission is suing to undo Altria’s nearly $13 billion investment in the popular e-cigarette maker Juul, alleging that the deal violates antitrust laws.
Altria, one of the world’s largest tobacco manufacturers, paid $12.8 billion in December 2018 for a 35% stake of Juul, becoming its largest stakeholder and valuing the San Francisco startup at $38 billion. The FTC’s complaint, filed Wednesday, alleges that the investment illegally eliminated competition between the two companies.
Altria used to make its own e-cigarettes, under the brands MarkTen and Green Smoke, until December 2018. As competitors, Altria and Juul tracked each other’s e-cigarette prices and “raced to innovate,” the FTC said in a press release.
That race effectively ended by the end of 2018, by which time Juul had become a household name and the most popular e-cigarette maker in the US. The FTC alleged that “Altria dealt with this competitive threat by agreeing not to compete in return for a substantial ownership interest in Juul.”
“Altria and Juul turned from competitors to collaborators by eliminating competition and sharing in Juul’s profits,” Ian Conner, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, said in a statement.
As part of the
investment, Altria would have been able to appoint representatives to Juul’s board of directors and convert its shares to voting securities. But those moves have been on hold as the FTC has been reviewing the investment, the Wall Street Journal reported in January.
In a memo obtained by BuzzFeed News, Juul’s chief legal officer told staff on Wednesday night that the company would be reviewing the complaint.
A Juul spokesperson declined to comment.
Separately, the FTC has been investigating the marketing practices of Juul and other e-cigarette companies. Juul has been widely criticized — and sued by regulators across the country — for allegedly advertising its addictive products to youth and helping start the teen vaping crisis. Juul, for its part, said its goal has always been to help adult smokers quit conventional cigarettes.
Since Altria put money in the startup, its investment has lost value as Juul has struggled to keep its footing. Late last year, Juul stopped sales of all its nontobacco flavors in the US while it’s in the process of asking the FDA to allow it to sell its products. It’s also faced a combination of regulatory restrictions and lackluster sales overseas. It laid off 650 employees in the fall, and over the last two months a series of high-profile executives, including cofounder James Monsees, have left.
Juul’s valuation is now calculated to be $12 billion.
Juul Cofounder James Monsees Is Stepping Down
Stephanie M. Lee · March 12, 2020
Juul Is Forcing Out Two Top Executives And Laying Off Global Staff
Stephanie M. Lee · Feb. 25, 2020
Juul Employees Say “Morale Is At An All-Time Low” After Its Worst Year Ever
Stephanie M. Lee · Feb. 5, 2020
Stephanie M. Lee is a science reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
ICE Must Release 10 Chronically Ill Immigrants After A Judge Said They’re Not Safe From The Coronavirus While In Custody
More than 38,000 immigrants are in ICE custody at US jails, and advocates fear conditions are ripe for mass infections and casualties.
Hamed AleazizBuzzFeed News Reporter March 31, 2020
Gerald Herbert / AP
Detainees wait for their turn at the medical clinic at the Winn Correctional Center in Louisiana, Sept. 26, 2019.
A federal judge ordered the immediate release of 10 immigrants in government custody on Tuesday, saying it would be “unconscionable and possibly barbaric” to keep the chronically ill detainees in jails where they could be exposed to the coronavirus.
The order issued by US District Judge John E. Jones III mandates the immediate release of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees from three county facilities in Pennsylvania — York, Clinton, and Pike — and comes as advocates continue to argue that immigration officials should cut the detention population.
“Should we fail to afford relief to Petitioners we will be a party to an unconscionable and possibly barbaric result,” Jones wrote in his order. “Our Constitution and laws apply equally to the most vulnerable among us, particularly when matters of public health are at issue. This is true even for those who have lost a measure of their freedom. If we are to remain the civilized society we hold ourselves out to be, it would be heartless and inhumane not to recognize Petitioners’ plight.”
The ruling comes just days after a federal judge in New York City also ordered the release of a group of ICE detainees.
For weeks, immigrant advocates have pushed ICE to release certain immigrants with underlying medical issues from the facilities and to scale back arrests, saying detention facilities were ripe for mass infections and casualties. There are currently more than 38,000 immigrants in ICE custody within private and local jails.
So far, the agency has not changed its detention practices in response to the pandemic.
“We are thrilled that the court agreed that our clients must be released immediately,” said Reggie Shuford, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which represented the detainees.
Jones echoed the concerns from advocates saying that the immigrant detainees “are unable to keep socially distant while detained by ICE and cannot keep the detention facilities sufficiently clean to combat the spread of the virus.” He added that, based on the nature of the virus and alleged situation within the jails, the detainees “face a very real risk of serious, lasting illness or death.”
The detainees who will be released have various medical complications, including diabetes, high blood pressure, blood clots, nerve pain, and leukemia.
ICE has already reported that four immigrants in its custody in New Jersey jails have tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
“This virus spares no demographic or race and is ruthless in its assault. The precautions being adopted to stop it should apply equally, if not more so, to the most vulnerable among us,” Jones wrote. “Petitioners have shown that adequate measures are not in place and cannot be taken to protect them from COVID-19 in the detention facilities, and that catastrophic results may ensue, both to Petitioners and to the communities surrounding the Facilities.”
More than 38,000 immigrants are in ICE custody at US jails, and advocates fear conditions are ripe for mass infections and casualties.
Hamed AleazizBuzzFeed News Reporter March 31, 2020
Gerald Herbert / AP
Detainees wait for their turn at the medical clinic at the Winn Correctional Center in Louisiana, Sept. 26, 2019.
A federal judge ordered the immediate release of 10 immigrants in government custody on Tuesday, saying it would be “unconscionable and possibly barbaric” to keep the chronically ill detainees in jails where they could be exposed to the coronavirus.
The order issued by US District Judge John E. Jones III mandates the immediate release of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees from three county facilities in Pennsylvania — York, Clinton, and Pike — and comes as advocates continue to argue that immigration officials should cut the detention population.
“Should we fail to afford relief to Petitioners we will be a party to an unconscionable and possibly barbaric result,” Jones wrote in his order. “Our Constitution and laws apply equally to the most vulnerable among us, particularly when matters of public health are at issue. This is true even for those who have lost a measure of their freedom. If we are to remain the civilized society we hold ourselves out to be, it would be heartless and inhumane not to recognize Petitioners’ plight.”
The ruling comes just days after a federal judge in New York City also ordered the release of a group of ICE detainees.
For weeks, immigrant advocates have pushed ICE to release certain immigrants with underlying medical issues from the facilities and to scale back arrests, saying detention facilities were ripe for mass infections and casualties. There are currently more than 38,000 immigrants in ICE custody within private and local jails.
So far, the agency has not changed its detention practices in response to the pandemic.
“We are thrilled that the court agreed that our clients must be released immediately,” said Reggie Shuford, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which represented the detainees.
Jones echoed the concerns from advocates saying that the immigrant detainees “are unable to keep socially distant while detained by ICE and cannot keep the detention facilities sufficiently clean to combat the spread of the virus.” He added that, based on the nature of the virus and alleged situation within the jails, the detainees “face a very real risk of serious, lasting illness or death.”
The detainees who will be released have various medical complications, including diabetes, high blood pressure, blood clots, nerve pain, and leukemia.
ICE has already reported that four immigrants in its custody in New Jersey jails have tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
“This virus spares no demographic or race and is ruthless in its assault. The precautions being adopted to stop it should apply equally, if not more so, to the most vulnerable among us,” Jones wrote. “Petitioners have shown that adequate measures are not in place and cannot be taken to protect them from COVID-19 in the detention facilities, and that catastrophic results may ensue, both to Petitioners and to the communities surrounding the Facilities.”
Hamed Aleaziz · March 27, 2020
Hamed Aleaziz · March 26, 2020
Immigration
Hamed Aleaziz is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
Contact Hamed Aleaziz at hamed.aleaziz@buzzfeed.com.
Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.
Immigration
Hamed Aleaziz is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco.
Contact Hamed Aleaziz at hamed.aleaziz@buzzfeed.com.
Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.
People Are Bailing Out Inmates From New York City's Biggest Jail, Where The Coronavirus Outbreak Is Skyrocketing
“It’s manifestly unfair to expose people to potentially fatal illness,” said a lawyer working on the crowdfunding effort.
Dominic Holden BuzzFeed News Reporter March 30, 2020
Andrew Kelly / Reuters
Signage outside of Rikers Island, a prison facility, where multiple cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed.
The journalists at BuzzFeed News are proud to bring you trustworthy and relevant reporting about the coronavirus. To help keep this news free, become a member and sign up for our newsletter, Outbreak Today.
While coronavirus infections in New York City’s largest jail have skyrocketed to nearly 10 times the rate of the city’s residents overall — according to one legal organization’s analysis — a grassroots crowdfunding campaign has been bailing out the Rikers Island inmates.
The Emergency Release Fund, a group of organizers and activists in New York, has raised $18,000 since March 23 and freed five inmates in the last three days, Alex Tereshonkova, a member of the group, told BuzzFeed News on Monday. The average donation is $20.
“They haven't been convicted of crimes,” said Tereshonkova, who pointed out that the inmates eligible for cash bail still have yet to receive a court trial. This month, New York suspended new trials indefinitely. “These people being detained are innocent until proven guilty. They have the same right to live that we do.”
Tereshonkova said inmates eligible for bail face charges ranging from parole violations, such as breaking a curfew, to more serious offenses like robberies — but they now wait in limbo, many of them sharing cells, as the virus closes in around them.
Founded in September, the Emergency Release Fund had originally focused on freeing transgender inmates, who historically have endured higher rates of violence and sexual assault behind bars. That focus has expanded during the pandemic, said Tereshonkova, to prioritize LGBTQ people and people of color, and now, to free anyone else at Rikers Island who qualifies for cash bail. “At this point, we are doing everybody.”
On Monday, news spread that Lorena Borjas, a transgender woman whose activism included ending cash bail in New York City, had died from complications from COVID-19, the disease caused by coronavirus.
Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund@TLDEF
Today TLDEF mourns the passing of the legendary Lorena Borjas, due to complications from COVID-19. Lorena was a champion of the transgender community, particularly Translatinx women of Jackson Heights, Queens. Thank you for everything, Lorena. Rest in Power.04:58 PM - 30 Mar 2020
Tereshonkova said that in addition to paying the inmates’ bail, the fund works to arrange lodging and transportation so they have a home upon release.
Rikers Island has 139 cases of COVID-19 among its 4,637 inmates, about 3% of the population, according to a report on Sunday from the Legal Aid Society, thereby outpacing infection rates in New York City; Wuhan, China; and Lombardi, Italy. The group has filed three lawsuits this month with moderate success to get inmates released. Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported Sunday the first inmate in the nation died of COVID-19 in Louisiana.
The New York City Department of Correction told BuzzFeed News on Monday evening that the number of cases had increased — 167 incarcerated patients and 114 personnel had tested positive for the virus.
Mayor Bill de Blasio and Gov. Andrew Cuomo separately announced that some inmates — including those with underlying conditions who face low-level charges — will be released.
But Josh Goldfein, an attorney and member of the Emergency Release Fund, told BuzzFeed News, “That still leaves thousands of people on Rikers Island, which has the highest infection rate in the world.”
“People cannot follow any social distancing guidelines if they are incarcerated — it’s just not physically possible,” he said. “It’s manifestly unfair to expose people to potentially fatal illness on that basis.”
The ACLU, a national progressive advocacy group, released poll results Monday that found 63% of registered voters support releasing “vulnerable populations” from jails and prisons to stop the spread of COVID-19.
Releasing prisoners during the pandemic has ignited some skepticism and anger. The New York Post reported that a city Department of Correction source said releasing inmates was “a disgrace to all correction officers — insane and dishonorable.” And BuzzFeed News reported on an Alabama judge who encountered furious blowback for ordering the release of some low-level offenders.
MORE ON THIS
Rikers Island Detainees Say They Fear Dying From The Coronavirus
Dominic Holden is a political reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in New York.
“It’s manifestly unfair to expose people to potentially fatal illness,” said a lawyer working on the crowdfunding effort.
Dominic Holden BuzzFeed News Reporter March 30, 2020
Andrew Kelly / Reuters
Signage outside of Rikers Island, a prison facility, where multiple cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed.
The journalists at BuzzFeed News are proud to bring you trustworthy and relevant reporting about the coronavirus. To help keep this news free, become a member and sign up for our newsletter, Outbreak Today.
While coronavirus infections in New York City’s largest jail have skyrocketed to nearly 10 times the rate of the city’s residents overall — according to one legal organization’s analysis — a grassroots crowdfunding campaign has been bailing out the Rikers Island inmates.
The Emergency Release Fund, a group of organizers and activists in New York, has raised $18,000 since March 23 and freed five inmates in the last three days, Alex Tereshonkova, a member of the group, told BuzzFeed News on Monday. The average donation is $20.
“They haven't been convicted of crimes,” said Tereshonkova, who pointed out that the inmates eligible for cash bail still have yet to receive a court trial. This month, New York suspended new trials indefinitely. “These people being detained are innocent until proven guilty. They have the same right to live that we do.”
Tereshonkova said inmates eligible for bail face charges ranging from parole violations, such as breaking a curfew, to more serious offenses like robberies — but they now wait in limbo, many of them sharing cells, as the virus closes in around them.
Founded in September, the Emergency Release Fund had originally focused on freeing transgender inmates, who historically have endured higher rates of violence and sexual assault behind bars. That focus has expanded during the pandemic, said Tereshonkova, to prioritize LGBTQ people and people of color, and now, to free anyone else at Rikers Island who qualifies for cash bail. “At this point, we are doing everybody.”
On Monday, news spread that Lorena Borjas, a transgender woman whose activism included ending cash bail in New York City, had died from complications from COVID-19, the disease caused by coronavirus.
Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund@TLDEF
Today TLDEF mourns the passing of the legendary Lorena Borjas, due to complications from COVID-19. Lorena was a champion of the transgender community, particularly Translatinx women of Jackson Heights, Queens. Thank you for everything, Lorena. Rest in Power.04:58 PM - 30 Mar 2020
Tereshonkova said that in addition to paying the inmates’ bail, the fund works to arrange lodging and transportation so they have a home upon release.
Rikers Island has 139 cases of COVID-19 among its 4,637 inmates, about 3% of the population, according to a report on Sunday from the Legal Aid Society, thereby outpacing infection rates in New York City; Wuhan, China; and Lombardi, Italy. The group has filed three lawsuits this month with moderate success to get inmates released. Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported Sunday the first inmate in the nation died of COVID-19 in Louisiana.
The New York City Department of Correction told BuzzFeed News on Monday evening that the number of cases had increased — 167 incarcerated patients and 114 personnel had tested positive for the virus.
Mayor Bill de Blasio and Gov. Andrew Cuomo separately announced that some inmates — including those with underlying conditions who face low-level charges — will be released.
But Josh Goldfein, an attorney and member of the Emergency Release Fund, told BuzzFeed News, “That still leaves thousands of people on Rikers Island, which has the highest infection rate in the world.”
“People cannot follow any social distancing guidelines if they are incarcerated — it’s just not physically possible,” he said. “It’s manifestly unfair to expose people to potentially fatal illness on that basis.”
The ACLU, a national progressive advocacy group, released poll results Monday that found 63% of registered voters support releasing “vulnerable populations” from jails and prisons to stop the spread of COVID-19.
Releasing prisoners during the pandemic has ignited some skepticism and anger. The New York Post reported that a city Department of Correction source said releasing inmates was “a disgrace to all correction officers — insane and dishonorable.” And BuzzFeed News reported on an Alabama judge who encountered furious blowback for ordering the release of some low-level offenders.
Rikers Island Detainees Say They Fear Dying From The Coronavirus
Rosalind Adams · March 27, 2020
Salvador Hernandez · March 23, 2020
Emmanuel Felton · March 27, 2020
Dominic Holden is a political reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in New York.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)