Thursday, August 19, 2021

 

Could Jason Kenney's low approval rating hurt Erin O'Toole? Not likely in Alberta

Alberta premier's approval rating lowest in the country

Some Conservative opponents hope that by reminding voters of Erin O'Toole's ties to Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, they can prevent the Conservative Party of Canada leader from becoming prime minister. (Evan Mitsui/CBC, Juris Graney/CBC)

While pundits speculate about whether Premier Jason Kenney's low approval rating in Alberta could hurt the federal Conservatives, some third-party advertisers and candidates are actively exploiting their connection.

In one radio advertisement, the listener gets to "eavesdrop" on two nurses discussing Kenney's attempt to cut their salaries.

"And it's not just Jason Kenney. I mean, Erin O'Toole," says one of the actors, referencing the federal Conservative Party leader.

"Oh, yeah, he's just as bad," says the other. "Voted to cut health care — and he supports Kenney right down the line."

Anticipating a federal election call, a political advertiser called the Protecting Canada Project has been airing radio, video and social media advertisements since January, many of which tie O'Toole to Kenney.

Both politicians were cabinet ministers in Stephen Harper's Conservative government. In the 2019 federal election, the freshly anointed premier travelled to Ontario to campaign for the federal Conservatives. Kenney endorsed O'Toole in the federal party's 2020 leadership race.

Another advertisement funded by Unifor, which aired before the election campaign began on Sunday, alleges that an O'Toole government would cut health care and public services, "just like Jason Kenney."

The Conservatives' platform says it would boost funding for mental health, incentivize domestic vaccine production, and increase the growth rate of health transfers to provinces and territories.

Unifor president Jerry Dias is blunt about his union's strategy.

"Jason Kenney is unilaterally hated across the rest of the country," he said. "Obviously, we are using the relationship between Kenney and O'Toole to hurt O'Toole."

Unifor is focusing on 24 ridings that saw close races in the last election to try and give progressive candidates an edge, he said. Three of those target ridings are in Edmonton, he said.

Alberta's lone NDP MP before dissolution, Heather McPherson, also has the provincial Conservatives in mind while she campaigns for re-election in Edmonton-Strathcona leading up to the Sept. 20 election.

"I can say that we hear Jason Kenney's name on those doorsteps more than anything else," she said while out door-knocking earlier this week.

Residents mention the UCP government's adversarial relationship with doctors and nurses, changes to the K-12 education system and opening the door to more coal mining in the Rocky Mountains as flashpoints, she said.

"I think the Conservatives will pay a price for that, and I think they should," McPherson said.

June poll by the Angus Reid Institute (ARI) pegged Kenney's approval rating as lowest of the Canadian premiers, at 31 per cent.

The premier's press secretary did not respond to a request for comment.

Conservative campaign organizers in Alberta said no federal candidates were available for an interview.

Pundits see no major upsets in Alberta

Strategist Michael Solberg says he can see why progressive parties would jump to use Kenney's reputation to try to bludgeon O'Toole.

The director at New West Public Affairs, and a past Stephen Harper staffer, Solberg said it's a tempting tactic for Liberals who want to distract from their own foibles.

It's a strategy Kenney himself used during the 2019 provincial election campaign, referring to the "Trudeau-Notley alliance," to imply NDP Leader Rachel Notley was aligned with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Solberg said the phrase played well in Alberta. But he doesn't think tethering the premier to O'Toole will have the same success.

"I have yet to see any examples of how that could possibly be working," he said. "This is a federal election that will be decided on federal issues."

Polling data bolsters his stance.

Shachi Kurl is president of the Angus Reid Institute in Vancouver (Richard Marion/Radio-Canada)

Although recent polls suggest support for the federal Conservatives has substantially dropped since the 2019 election campaign, an online ARI poll last week found half of Alberta voters intended to cast ballots for Conservative candidates.

Angus Reid Institute president Shachi Kurl said this far outweighs the support for any other party in the province. 

"While Albertans in their province may be very angry with their premier at the moment ... it may or may not translate into a change in federal vote," she said.

University of Calgary political science Prof. Anthony Sayers said the Conservatives have such a wide margin of support in enough of Alberta's 34 federal ridings that major upsets during this election are unlikely.

All support bleeding from Conservatives would all have to go to one opposing candidate, rather than splintering among parties on the left and right, he said.

He does think Alberta's economy and demographics are changing enough that a political shift — and more competitive elections — will ultimately follow.

Meanwhile, has Kenney been asked to stay away, or might he appear alongside O'Toole during the campaign?

Solberg said it could happen if the federal leader makes an Alberta stop.

"I think it's possible, and I think it would actually do well."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Janet French is a provincial affairs reporter with CBC Edmonton. She has also worked at the Edmonton Journal and Saskatoon StarPhoenix. You can reach her at janet.french@cbc.ca

With files from Paige Parsons, Erin Collins and Mathieu Gohier

YOU SAID YOU USED DATA TO DECIDE
Criticism fired at province for not releasing data to support changing Alberta’s COVID-19 protocols
WHERE IS IT?!

Julia Wong - 47m ago

© Chris Schwarz, Government of Alberta
Alberta chief medical officer of health Dr. Deena Hinshaw delivering her last regularly scheduled update on COVID-19 at the Federal Building in Edmonton, Alta. on June 29, 2021.

Doctors and policy experts are criticizing the province for its delay in releasing scientific data and evidence it says justifies shifting Alberta’s approach to COVID-19.

The July announcement by the province to remove COVID-19 protocols -- such as testing, tracing and isolating -- was met with outcry from residents, Canada’s top doctors, as well as professional organizations such as the Alberta Medical Association and the Canadian Paediatric Society. Last week, the protocols were extended until Sept. 27 to allow the province to monitor hospitalizations amid a rise in cases in the past few weeks.

On Wednesday night, chief medical officer of health Dr. Deena Hinshaw told a town hall of healthcare professionals the information that explains why the province made the changes to the COVID protocols was not yet ready to be released; Global News heard a recording of the virtual meeting.

READ MORE: Hinshaw says data that justified changing Alberta’s COVID-19 protocols still not public

Video: Dr. Deena Hinshaw tells town hall data used to change Alberta’s COVID-19 protocols still not public

“The work that’s required isn’t just that list of articles. It’s trying to put it together into a narrative mode that helps explain not just to you as my peers, but to all Albertans, that list of considerations that was taken into account,” Hinshaw said.

Dr. Parker Vandermeer, a rural physician, said that he is not optimistic the data will ever be made be public.

“I was quite concerned last night when Dr. Hinshaw mentioned they have to form the narrative for how they’re going to present this information,” he said.

“As far as I’m concerned, scientific data should not need to be formed into a narrative to be presented.”

He said physicians are capable of doing their own critical analysis of the information.


“If this information was ready six weeks ago for it to be presented to cabinet, for them to basically green light this all with no further questions or changes, I have to question why that data is not also ready for physicians to see now,” he said.

The province has made similar commitments to releasing data in the past that have yet to be followed through on, such as sector-specific transmission data.

Global News has reached out to Alberta Health for comment on the criticisms. The story will be updated if a response is received.

Video: The politics behind Alberta’s COVID-19 protocol changes

“It’s been an issue throughout the pandemic. I really felt like we’re flying blind and being asked to basically act in blind faith for a lot of these recommendations,” Vandermeer said.

“I think what’s so different about this one is it’s the first time we have majorly deviated from what experts around the world are recommending.

READ MORE: Canada’s top doctors say Alberta’s COVID-19 plan could have ripple effects across the country

“To make all these changes and also not to be able to present evidence to back that up is very concerning.”

The announcement by the province to remove testing, tracing and isolating was met with outcry from residents, Canada’s top doctors, as well as professional organizations such as the Alberta Medical Association and the Canadian Paediatric Society.

Dev Menon, a health policy professor at the University of Alberta, calls the situation a “vacuum of leadership.”

“When you make a statement certain decisions are being made on the basis of science and evidence, which is what people like us have been pushing them to do, yet they are reticent to produce it – it makes me wonder, was it ever there in the first place?” he said.

Menon questioned why the data is still not available to the public.

“Especially when there was enough clarity in the data for cabinet to make a decision…so what’s the problem?” he said.


He is concerned the credibility between the province and healthcare practitioners is going downhill.

READ MORE: Alberta keeping COVID-19 measures for another six weeks

“You don’t know what to believe anymore and then it becomes you don’t believe anything anymore,” Menon said.

Zahid Butt, an infectious disease epidemiologist at the University of Waterloo, said is it essential to have transparency in a public health emergency.

“A lot of important decisions are being made here, because you’re deciding on removing masks, you’re deciding on leaving out social distancing. There has to be a real evidence saying you can do all of these things,” he said

“Whether these decisions are politically correct or not, the decision should always be made on scientific evidence.”

Butt said the data should be shared with the public because Albertans are putting faith in public health leaders.


“You let people know this is happening and these are the limitations. But you share the data so that they know, at each step, how everyone is making those decisions because they impact a lot of our lives,” he said.

Kenney’s principal secretary stepping down

Aug 19, 2021 | 11:55 AM

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney says his principal secretary is leaving to become the CEO of Ducks Unlimited Canada.

Kenney says in a statement that Larry Kaumeyer, who was also Kenney’s acting chief of staff, plans to leave on Oct. 1.

Kenney says he understands how the chance to serve as the head of Ducks Unlimited is a dream job for a lifelong hunter and outdoorsman.

The premier’s office says the ethics commissioner was consulted on the hire.

 OPINIONS

Kenney a liability for Conservatives on the election trail

From Conservative pillar to pariah in just two years.

That’s been the fate of Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, who, in 2019, was so revered in Conservative circles that he campaigned for Andrew Scheer’s Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) in Ontario in that year’s fall federal election.

Since then, however, Kenney has devolved into the country’s least popular premier to serve during the pandemic. He also failed to keep his promises to Albertans of more jobs, more pipelines, and a stronger economy.

The political godfather has become the deadbeat dad.D

During the federal election campaign, Kenney has kept such a low profile so far, you’d need a backhoe to find him.

Oh, he’s still making appearances. But they’re on Facebook and carefully orchestrated. On Wednesday, for example, he posted a video announcing a maternity clinic in northern Alberta, and another visiting a successful farm run by a Syrian immigrant that was targeted by vandals.

Not one mention of Justin Trudeau or the Liberals, or even a nod to the federal campaign.

This must be driving Kenney a little batty. He’s a skilled and combative politician who relishes a good campaign fight. But this time around, he seems to be stuck on the sidelines.

Not so long ago, he was scrappily playing the game.

As part of his “fight back” strategy against the federal government, Kenney announced he’d hold Senate elections and a referendum against the equalization program in October. Both are purely symbolic gestures, but Kenney is happy to flip the bird, politically speaking, at Trudeau, and as often as possible.

Kenney has loudly railed against the federal $10-a-day child-care program that promised money to Quebec but not Alberta. Never mind that Quebec already has a government-subsidized daycare system, and therefore qualifies for the federal money, while Alberta doesn’t. Kenney saw this as another opportunity to frame Trudeau as an Alberta-hating hypocrite. Unfair, of course. But when it comes to scolding Ottawa, Kenney is as subtle as a hand grenade.

In July, when federal Health Minister Patty Hajdu questioned Alberta’s plan to stop routine testing and tracing of COVID — and allow those who are sick to mingle freely in public — Kenney shot back: “We’re not going to take lectures from Minister Hajdu.”

But then, just as critics had warned, Alberta’s COVID numbers began to rise, and, suddenly, Kenney was taking lectures from Minister Hajdu, not that he’d admit it.

Last Friday, with a federal election looming, the Kenney government reversed its widely questioned, if not outright condemned, COVID plans. Alberta’s chief medical officer, Dr. Deena Hinshaw, announced the province would postpone its controversial lifting of COVID restrictions until Sept. 27.

Hinshaw said she was simply following the latest scientific data. Of course.

But a skeptic might notice that the postponement — approved by Kenney and his cabinet ministers — will suspiciously last through the federal election campaign, and thus help prevent a major spike in COVID cases that would embarrass Kenney, and, by extension, federal Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole.

The two might not be campaigning together, but that won’t stop Trudeau from dragging Kenney into the fray.

Kenney has become a whipping boy for Trudeau, who, over the summer, has attacked the Alberta premier overtly and obliquely for a number of things, including equalization and climate change.

“The fact that some politicians here in Alberta have been fighting against even recognizing that climate change is real has slowed down Alberta’s ability to prepare for the economic future and the jobs of the future,” said Trudeau while on a pre-election swing through Calgary in July.

Trudeau wants to shackle the untested O’Toole to the unpopular Kenney, conflating the two in voters’ minds.

The Liberals’ election slogan might be “Forward. For Everyone,” but it should be: “Vote for O’Toole and his CPC and you’ll get a federal version of Kenney and his UCP.”

What’s interesting, though, is that even though O’Toole might be happy to keep Kenney off the federal campaign trail, he’s happy to have him on the trail in another form: Kenney’s successful platform policies from Alberta’s 2019 provincial election.

Among them are promises to cut red tape, scrap the carbon tax on consumers, respect provincial elections of senators, increase financial help to Alberta through the Fiscal Stabilization Program, and aggressively defend the oil and gas industry.

And there’s this sweeping comment in O’Toole’s campaign platform aimed squarely at the West, which could have been written by Kenney himself: “The current government’s disregard for Western Canada, which sometimes crosses the line into outright hostility, has pushed Canada to the brink of a national unity crisis. This government simply does not understand or respect the West.”

This will play well among Conservatives on the Prairies, perhaps even those in Central Canada, too.

But one thing that’s not playing well in Canada these days, including in Alberta, is Jason Kenney himself.

If the first few days of the federal campaign are any indication, the Conservatives’ godfather of the 2019 campaign will be wearing cement overshoes for the duration of the 2021 campaign.

MORE THOMSON: Kenney’s COVID response pits pandemic against politics

Singh goes after Kenney's health-care record at Alberta campaign stop

Fakiha Baig
The Canadian Press Staff
Published Thursday, August 19, 2021 

Aug. 19: Singh vows increased health care funding


NDP leader Jagmeet Singh chats with health care workers in Edmonton, on Thursday, August 19, 2021. 
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Paul Chiasson

EDMONTON -- NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh campaigned in Alberta on Thursday, with double-barrelled attacks on Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau and Premier Jason Kenney.

Singh stood near the East Edmonton Health Centre to speak about health care while trying to capitalize on Premier Jason Kenney's declining popularity amid the pandemic.

The 42-year-old NDP leader also addressed the multiple violent attacks against Black Muslim women in the province all while attempting to paint Kenney and Trudeau with the same brush.





"We're seeing cut after cut that is driving health care workers out of the province," Singh told reporters as cars honked at him while he stood next to a busy Edmonton road.

"These cuts at the provincial level are only made worse because for years and years federal governments have been cutting health care as well. The Conservatives cut health care, and then Trudeau kept in those same cuts."

Throughout the pandemic, Kenney has been grappling with a public outcry over temporary bed closures and reports of dozens of nurses and doctors leaving the province due to wage cuts and other rollbacks.

Singh said unlike his counterparts, he wants to actively work with any province or territory that wants to invest in health care.

Singh also addressed the rising rate of hate crimes across the country.

Over the last eight months, several Muslim and Black women who wear a hijab in Alberta have been targeted, violently assaulted, threatened and harassed while walking down the street or waiting for a light rail train.

Singh took a shot at Trudeau again, saying the root cause of the attacks is online radicalization, which the prime minister has talked a lot about but hasn't done much to make any changes.

"Tackling online hate is a way to get at some of the root causes. A lot of misinformation and some of the conspiracy theories comes from social media posts that radicalized people with misinformation," Singh said.

"The other piece is making sure we use hate laws appropriately. Absolutely there's problems around making sure when a crime is identified as a hate crime, that it's prosecuted that way … that's something that absolutely needs to happen."

During the announcement, Singh stood next to Heather McPherson, the MP for the only NDP riding in Alberta, Edmonton Strathcona, while he insisted his relationship was solid with former New Democrat premier Rachel Notley.

She looms large in the federal NDP's quest to retain its Alberta seat and perhaps expand into other ridings.

The two hold opposing views on the Trans Mountain pipeline and Notley has been vocal about their disagreement on it, but Singh says the two chat regularly and have far more in common.

NOW PLAYING
Jagmeet Singh: 'We're committed to expanding it, we believe in defending our public health care, so that people have the care they need.'

------

The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 19, 2021.

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Facebook and Canadian Press News Fellowship.




 

NDP hoping to make gains in the West

With just over four weeks to go until voting day on Sept. 20, the New Democrats are busy fielding candidates to run in all 338 ridings. As of Thursday morning, the NDP had confirmed 196.

No party has confirmed candidates in all ridings yet.

The NDP hopes to make gains in Saskatchewan, Alberta, northern Ontario, southwestern Ontario, Toronto, Atlantic Canada, and British Columbia, “particularly the Lower Mainland and some interior seats,” NDP national director Anne McGrath told iPolitics on Thursday.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh was the first federal leader to visit British Columbia, shortly after the election was called on Sunday. On Thursday, Singh was the first to visit Alberta, where he campaigned with Edmonton—Griesbach candidate Blake Desjarlais and Heather McPherson, the incumbent in Edmonton—Strathcona. McPherson is the only NDP MP in Alberta. Desjarlais is a Metis activist and community leader.

“We’re very interested in what’s happening in Edmonton—Griesbach,” McGrath said. “There are provincial premiers that a lot of people don’t feel are representing them, and people are very concerned about the management of the pandemic (and) the vision for the recovery.”

To ensure voters had the information they needed early on in the campaign — and because more people are expected to either mail in their ballots or vote early — the party released its platform before the election was called, said McGrath.

“We ran in the last campaign with a very progressive platform that had health care at its centre,” she said, explaining why it’s so similar to this year’s platform. “And I can’t think of a time when Canadians are more concerned about health care than right now.”

On Wednesday, Elections Canada’s chief electoral officer, Stephane Perrault, told reporters in Ottawa he was expecting significantly more mail-in ballots than in previous elections because of the pandemic. Perrault also announced four more advance-polling days to prevent lineups on Sept. 20.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh makes campaign stop in Edmonton, takes shots at Jason Kenney over health care

Author of the article: Ashley Joannou
Publishing date: Aug 19, 2021 • 
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is campaigning in Edmonton on Thursday.
 PHOTO BY DAVID BLOOM /Postmedia

Federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh took shots at Premier Jason Kenney’s “attacks” on health care workers Thursday and promised to create a $250 million Critical Shortages Fund to address the shortage of nurses and health care workers across Canada if he becomes prime minister.


Singh, the first federal leader to visit Alberta this election campaign, was in the Conservative-held riding of Edmonton Griesbach. His party is promising to ensure that provinces also commit funding specifically for health care workers and says the federal fund would help train and hire 2,000 nurses.

“Alberta families are getting it from all sides — Jason Kenney attacks nurses and health care workers and the Justin Trudeau government is carrying on with Conservative health care funding cuts,” Singh said in a statement.

“Conservatives always cut health care, and while Justin Trudeau promised he would reverse the cut he has not. He has kept delivering less. New Democrats will restore funding for health care and make sure it’s used to improve health care services by hiring nurses.”

Kenney and the UCP government have been fighting with health-care workers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, both struggling to sign a new contract with doctors and in contentious negotiations with the nurses union which has included a proposal that nurses take pay cuts.

The Alberta government has also faced significant criticism over hospital bed closures across the province due to staffing shortages.

When asked whether his plan this election was to try and capitalize on Kenney’s lack of popularity to get votes for federal NDP candidates, Singh said conservatives can’t be trusted with health care.

“Absolutely, we’re going to point to Jason Kenney and his bad decisions that hurt people. We’re going to point to conservatives that can’t be trusted with health care and we’re going to point to Justin Trudeau, who continues to do the exact same thing, leaving health-care workers, and most importantly people, behind,” he said.


This afternoon at 1:50 p.m., Singh is expected to hold a whistlestop where he will be joined by local NDP candidates.

In the 2019, the NDP won one of Alberta’s 34 federal ridings: Edmonton Strathcona.

Canadians go to the polls for the federal vote on Sept. 20.


Jagmeet Singh
theJagmeetSingh
Frontline healthcare workers put their lives on the line for all of us. And they are angry Liberals and Cons. cut funding that makes it harder to provide care people need. New Democrats like @DesjarlaisBlake, @HMcPhersonMP always fight for better health care. That’s who we are. pic.twitter.com/JZdlMQIxG2
Twitter





Singh vows to increase to health-care spending, train and hire 2,000 nurses

Aug 19, 2021
CTV News

Jagmeet Singh: 'We're committed to expanding it, we believe in defending our public health care, so that people have the care they need.'

Singh goes after Kenney's health-care

 record at Alberta campaign stop


Singh goes after Kenney

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh campaigned in Alberta on Thursday, with double-barrelled attacks on Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau and Premier Jason Kenney.

Singh stood near the East Edmonton Health Centre to speak about health care while trying to capitalize on Premier Jason Kenney's declining popularity amid the pandemic.

The 42-year-old NDP leader also addressed the multiple violent attacks against Black Muslim women in the province all while attempting to paint Kenney and Trudeau with the same brush.

"We're seeing cut after cut that is driving health care workers out of the province," Singh told reporters as cars honked at him while he stood next to a busy Edmonton road.

"These cuts at the provincial level are only made worse because for years and years federal governments have been cutting health care as well. The Conservatives cut health care, and then Trudeau kept in those same cuts."

Throughout the pandemic, Kenney has been grappling with a public outcry over temporary bed closures and reports of dozens of nurses and doctors leaving the province due to wage cuts and other rollbacks.

Singh said unlike his counterparts, he wants to actively work with any province or territory that wants to invest in health care.

Singh also addressed the rising rate of hate crimes across the country.

Over the last eight months, several Muslim and Black women who wear a hijab in Alberta have been targeted, violently assaulted, threatened and harassed while walking down the street or waiting for a light rail train.

Singh took a shot at Trudeau again, saying the root cause of the attacks is online radicalization, which the prime minister has talked a lot about but hasn't done much to make any changes.

"Tackling online hate is a way to get at some of the root causes. A lot of misinformation and some of the conspiracy theories comes from social media posts that radicalized people with misinformation," Singh said.

"The other piece is making sure we use hate laws appropriately. Absolutely there's problems around making sure when a crime is identified as a hate crime, that it's prosecuted that way … that's something that absolutely needs to happen."

During the announcement, Singh stood next to Heather McPherson, the MP for the only NDP riding in Alberta, Edmonton Strathcona, while he insisted his relationship was solid with former New Democrat premier Rachel Notley.

She looms large in the federal NDP's quest to retain its Alberta seat and perhaps expand into other ridings.

The two hold opposing views on the Trans Mountain pipeline and Notley has been vocal about their disagreement on it, but Singh says the two chat regularly and have far more in common.

 LONG READ

The rise and fall of the oligarch-maker

How one mysterious financier came to sit at the top table of oligarchs and power.


He had glittering success – a long career managing one of the world’s biggest trust companies and making millions from Russia’s oligarchs. Even as his clients mysteriously died, one by one, he managed to stay in the shadows and remain ahead of the game.

Until undercover reporters from Al Jazeera’s I-Unit caught him on secret camera agreeing to sell an English football club to a convicted Chinese criminal, in breach of football regulations.

Who was this man? And how deep did his business connections go?

The rise and fall of the oligarch-maker | Corruption | Al Jazeera


Mexico sues US gunmakers, but will it make a dent in trafficking?

The Mexican government took the unprecedented step of filing a lawsuit against US-based gun manufacturers and distributors in an American court. Here’s what could happen.

Mexico is seeking to hold US gun manufacturers and distributors accountable for high levels of gun violence in the country, where legal firearm ownership is restricted [File: Mario Rivera Alvarado/AP Photo]

Mexico City, Mexico – Three years ago, Cresencio “Chencho” Pacheco became one of the estimated 357,000 people in Mexico forcibly displaced from their homes due to conflict and violence.

Pacheco became a spokesperson for himself and 1,600 of his neighbours who fled their villages in the mountains of Guerrero state when a local group armed with hand grenades and firearms took over the territory for drug trafficking and other illegal activities.

Based on bullets found at the scene, some of the weapons wielded by the gang are believed to have been smuggled into Mexico from the United States.

The vast majority of the people displaced from Guerrero in November 2018 have never returned to their villages.

Crescencio ‘Chencho’ Pacheco (left) listens as another member of his displaced community speaks, demanding security from the administration of Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador [Photo: Ann Deslandes]

Some are scattered throughout Mexico, while many — like Pacheco — are now seeking asylum in the US due to the continuing threat posed by the gang that still occupies the area.

His story is just one example of how lax gun laws north of the border are fuelling violence in Mexico, which heavily restricts the sale and ownership of firearms.

“It has destabilised the country,” Pacheco told Al Jazeera of the guns that have poured into Mexico. He is currently living in temporary accommodations in the US while he waits for a decision on his asylum case.

Earlier this month, to help curtail the flow of illegal weapons, the Mexican government took the unprecedented step of filing a lawsuit against US-based gun manufacturers and distributors, alleging that their negligence has led to illegal arms trafficking into Mexico and fuelled violence and bloodshed.

Yet while the suit sends a powerful message, some contend it is unlikely to curtail the flow of illicit arms into Mexico.

Made in America, trafficked into Mexico

The lawsuit (PDF), which was filed in US federal district court in Massachusetts and is seeking $10bn in damages, takes aim at marquee brands in the US firearms business, including Smith & Wesson Brands; Barrett Firearms Manufacturing; Beretta USA; Beretta Holding; Century International Arms; Colt’s Manufacturing Company; Glock Inc; Glock Ges.m.b.H.; Sturm, Ruger and Company and gun supplier Witmer Public Safety Group, which does business as Interstate Arms.

The complaint contends that 70 to 90 percent of the guns recovered from crime scenes in Mexico were trafficked from the US, and that the majority of them were made by six US manufacturers: Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Century Arms, Colt’s, Glock and Ruger.

The complaint also highlights that “Mexico has one gun store in the entire nation and issues fewer than 50 gun permits per year” and claims that “a gun manufactured in the US is more likely to be used to murder a Mexican citizen (17,000 in 2019) than an American citizen (14,000 in 2019)”.

Family and friends attend a February 5, 2020 funeral procession for one of the victims of a shooting at a video-game arcade in Uruapan, Mexico, where violence reached shocking proportions as cartels battled for territory [File: Marco Ugarte/AP Photo]


A report (PDF) by the US Government Accountability Office released in February examining Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) data found that 70 percent of firearms reported to have been recovered in Mexico from 2014 through 2018 and submitted for tracing were from the US.

“These guns are legally purchased in gun shops or shows, mainly by US citizens and/or legal residents,” Alan Zamayoa, an analyst with global risk consultancy Control Risks, told Al Jazeera. “Once acquired either by gun traffickers or single individuals, guns are sold to the criminal groups intending to cross them into Mexico.”


Zamayoa said “the easiest and cheapest way” to transport guns from the US to Mexico “is through illicit crossing points along the border” – indeed, in the opposite direction of drug smuggling routes.

Guns are also smuggled through legal international crossings, noted Zamayoa. This usually occurs in collusion with customs officials; arms also get across the border in pieces, with different people crossing with individual or specific parts, and “once all the smugglers and parts are in Mexico, they reassemble the guns,” he said.

Because the figures in the February report only represent the firearms submitted to the ATF by the office of Mexico’s federal attorney general, the actual number is likely higher.

For its part, Mexico’s government estimates that more than two million weapons have been illegally smuggled into the country from the US over the past decade. They have helped fuel a rising gun homicide rate, which reached 13 homicides per 100,000 people in 2020, according to Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography.


Using the courts


Mexico’s lawsuit against US gun manufacturers follows other grand gestures by the administration of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, also known as AMLO, to push back on its northern neighbour and signal a departure from the corruption and violence of its predecessors.

Indeed, from threatening to kick out the US Drug Enforcement Administration to accusing the US government of coup-mongering, grand gestures of Mexican sovereignty have become a hallmark of the AMLO administration.

“The Lopez Obrador administration seeks to refocus bilateral security cooperation on reducing homicides and reducing arms trafficking from the US, among other issues,” Stephanie Brewer, director for Mexico and migrant rights with the Washington Office on Latin America, a US-based think-tank, told Al Jazeera.

“The lawsuit comes in this context and sends a strong message on the importance that Mexico’s federal government attaches to this,” she added

.
Gun trafficking from the US has helped fuel Mexico’s high gun homicide rate, which reached 13 homicides per 100,000 people in 2020, according to Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography [File: Rashide Frias/AP Photo]


As Brewer observed, “This isn’t the first time that Mexico has signalled its interest in prioritising arms trafficking, but the current administration took this message to a new level.”

Mexico’s lawsuit could face a number of hurdles, chiefly the US’s Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields gun manufacturers from nearly all civil liability and blocks victims and their families from suing them.

“US legislation makes it very difficult to sue gun manufacturers for the violence inflicted with their weapons, so the lawsuit faces a tough path ahead,” Brewer said.

One of the gun manufacturers Mexico is suing, Glock Inc, has labelled the lawsuit “baseless” and promised to “vigorously” defend itself.
Sending a message

Zamayoa said that even if the ruling favours the Mexican government, it won’t be enough to have a tangible impact on gun trafficking volume.

“Rather than reducing gun violence, a potential successful lawsuit is likely to be reflected in a change in the way criminals get access to guns,” Zamayoa said.

One of the gun manufacturers Mexico is suing, Glock Inc, has labelled the lawsuit ‘baseless’ and promised to ‘vigorously’ defend itself [File: Bloomberg]

“For example, criminals can become more involved in in-house gun production, or look for other markets outside the US to get their gun supply. Likewise, the theft of guns from security forces in Mexico can also increase,” he noted.

Still, Brewer said, “this lawsuit sends a strong message to the US on the importance of this issue to the Mexican government”, even if it does not succeed in court.

But, she added, it will also take reforms on the Mexican side to fully address the issue of gun violence in the country.

“Overall, the only real solution to Mexico’s criminal violence is through investigation and prosecution of criminal networks to reduce impunity and disrupt collusion and tolerance by state actors,” Brewer said, noting it is also necessary to have “professionalisation and accountability for Mexico’s police forces at all levels”.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Ex Purdue Pharma chief denies responsibility for US opioid crisis

Richard Sackler’s denial of responsibility for the opioid crisis comes a day after another Sackler family member said the group would not accept a settlement without guarantees of immunity from further legal action.


United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has tallied more than 500,000 deaths in the US to opioid overdose since 2000 [File: Seth Wenig/AP Photo]

18 Aug 2021

The former president and board chair of Purdue Pharma told a court Wednesday that he, his family and the company are not responsible for the opioid crisis in the United States.

Richard Sackler, a member of the family that owns the company, was asked whether each bears responsibility during a federal bankruptcy hearing in White Plains, New York, over whether a judge should accept the OxyContin maker’s plan to settle thousands of lawsuits.

For each, he gave a one-word answer: “No.”

Richard Sackler’s denial of responsibility for the opioid crisis comes a day after another Sackler family member said the group wouldn’t accept a settlement without guarantees of immunity from further legal action.

The previous words of Richard Sackler, now 76, are at the heart of lawsuits accusing the Stamford, Connecticut-based company of a major role in sparking a nationwide opioid epidemic.

In the 1996 event to launch sales of OxyContin, he told the company’s sales force that there would be “a blizzard of prescriptions that will bury the competition”.

Five years later, as it was apparent that the powerful prescription pain drug was being misused in some cases, he said in an email that Purdue Pharma would have to “hammer on the abusers in every way possible”, describing them as “the culprits and the problem”.

For those reasons, the activists crusading against companies involved in selling opioids often see Richard Sackler — who was president of the company from 1999 to 2003, chair of its board from 2004 through 2007, and a board member from 1990 until 2018 — as a prime villain.

He has not appeared in public forums in recent years outside video of a deposition he gave in a lawsuit in 2015.

During a hearing conducted by videoconference on Wednesday, Sackler, now 76, said he had laryngitis, and his voice was sometimes soft.

In response to more than three hours of questions, mostly from Maryland Assistant Attorney General Brian Edmunds, his most common answer was, “I don’t recall.”
A pharmacist holds a bottle OxyContin made by Purdue Pharma at a pharmacy in Provo, Utah, the United States [File: George Frey/Reuters]

Sackler, whose father was one of three brothers who nearly 70 years ago bought the company that later became Purdue Pharma, didn’t recall emails he wrote a decade or more ago; whether Purdue Pharma’s board approved certain sales strategies; whether a company owned by Sackler family members sold opioids in Argentina; or whether he paid any of his own money as part of a settlement with Oklahoma to which the Sackler family contributed $75m.


Often, he answered questions with more questions, asking for precision.

When Edmunds asked him if he knew how many people in the US had died from using opioids, Sackler asked him to specify over which time period.

Edmunds did: 2005 to 2017.

“I don’t know,” Sackler said. He said that he had looked at some data on deaths in the past, though.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has tallied more than 500,000 deaths in the US to opioid overdose, including both prescription drugs and illicit ones such as heroin and illegally produced fentanyl, since 2000.

At another point, Edmunds asked whether he ever had conversations with sales managers.


“Can you define what you mean by sales managers?” Sackler asked.

Edmunds did. Then Sackler said he didn’t recall any such conversations.

A man looks at cardboard gravestones with the names of victims of opioid abuse outside the courthouse where the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy is taking place in White Plains, New York, the US [File: Seth Wenig/Reuters]

Edmunds asked about a disagreement over company sales targets at one point. Sackler corrected him.

“You used the word dispute,” he said. “It wasn’t a dispute. It was a difference of opinion.”

Sackler’s testimony came a day after his son, David Sackler, testified.

The younger Sackler, who also served on Purdue Pharma’s board, reiterated something that has long been the family’s position: They will agree to their part of the plan to restructure Purdue Pharma only if family members receive protection from lawsuits over opioids and other company action

If those provisions do not stay in the deal, David Sackler said, the family would instead face lawsuits. “I believe we would litigate the claims to their final outcome,” he said.

On Wednesday, Richard Sackler said the family would not agree if states that oppose the deal were not bound by it and allowed to move ahead with lawsuits against the company and family members.

Under the proposed settlement, members of the Sackler family would give up ownership of Purdue Pharma and contribute $4.5bn over time in cash and control of charitable funds. Most of the money, along with the company’s future profits, would be used to abate the opioid crisis. Some would go to individual victims and their families.

US Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert Drain said Wednesday that he expected testimony to be completed Thursday, final arguments to begin on Monday and a decision later next week.

SOURCE: AP