Thursday, May 07, 2026

War and Social Medicine


 May 6, 2026

Photo by Sunguk Kim

As social medicine practitioners, we take a side. We have seen our broad civil society and academic efforts to convince U.S. and other countries’ politicians to stop or not to participate in genocide fall on deaf ears. We recognize that the Zionist entity called Israel will not stop committing war crimes and its genocide in West Asia unless it is forced to.

We take the side of unconditional peace, human rights, and equity – comprehensively embodied in the principles and practice of Social Medicine. Therefore, we value the efforts to stop the attacks and deliver humanitarian aid to Palestine, Iran, and Lebanon. We also urge the protection of health and humanitarian brigades and the international press in a conflict that systematically kills those who fight disinformation or simply seek to save the lives of innocent civilians.

Actions by Israel leading to deaths, injuries, and destruction of facilities needed for survival do not happen only in their region. Israel has participated in or supported militarily other genocides and repressive governments around the world. These actions have led to devastating effects on health and survival for many countries in South America, Central America, the Caribbean, North America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Israel has described Palestine as a “laboratory” to test armaments, surveillance systems, and military tactics and strategies so that the Israeli government and Israeli corporations can sell them to dictators and repressive governments around the world.

This journal has already before taken a stance against the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people by the government of Israel, which on 30 March 2026 flagrantly spotlighted its apartheid occupation with a new law making the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the West Bank when found guilty of deadly attacks unilaterally deemed to be acts of terrorism. The U.S. and the European Union have funded, provided the arms for, and given political cover to this genocide. Now the U.S. has joined with Israel in a tag team of sorts to assault Iran and Lebanon. In the opening of the war, the U.S. double-tapped a primary school for girls in Minab with two Tomahawk cruise missiles. It murdered primary school girls and their teachers with the first missile – then, family members, neighbors, and rescuers with the second, 40 minutes later – for a total of 170-some. This demonstrates the willingness of the U.S. to directly engage in the violation of international law, committing war crimes that have been a matter of course for Israel. In accordance with this law, the leaders of the U.S. and Israel ought to be held criminally accountable for the current aggression and wars.

As Social Medicine practitioners, we recognize the social determination of ill-health and premature deaths. We not only examine the proximate causes, but we also identify the determining large-scale social forces (structural determinants). In the current situation, we can identify a variety of them, including the use of Zionism as an organizing principle to justify a settler colonialist apartheid that occupies the land of Palestine. Zionism’s adherents include Christian fundamentalists. Furthermore, many U.S. military personnel are reporting that their officers are also telling them that they are fulfilling a divine mission as explicitly endorsed by some Congress members and officials of the Department of War. Similarly, Israeli authorities allude to “Greater Israel” as a religious justification for a perpetual war of aggression.

As Social Medicine practitioners, it is evident to us that the U.S. empire is in decline. History teaches us that declining empires overreach. The U.S. seeks to perpetuate this system through violence. By initiating the war of aggression against Iran, the U.S. and its tag team partner are contributing to the further decline of the U.S. empire. This is happening in a widespread, extreme, and dangerous manner which can lead to a devastating (and possibly the last) Third World War.

As Social Medicine practitioners, we recognize that the main costs of war are borne not just by combatants, but increasingly – and even primarily – by ordinary people. When critical infrastructure – such as airports, shipping, ground transportation, fuel, fertilizer, food supplies, water (desalination plants), sanitation, electricity, hospitals, clinics – are blown up by bombs, ordinary people die because they cannot obtain the things that make their lives possible. Meanwhile, war is promoted by the military industrial complex, which benefits greatly, further escalating already extreme global inequities.

To the east of the Persian Gulf, the countries of Asia, dependent on the flow of petroleum through the Strait of Hormuz, are in dire straits. Their people and their migrant workers are already starting to feel the pain.

In the Americas, the U.S. is violating all norms of international law. It has attacked civilian boats in international waters. The U.S. further violated Venezuela’s sovereignty, sabotaged its water and power plants, and launched a military attack, wounding many and killing more than 75 Venezuelans and Cubans. It illegally kidnapped President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

The war against Cuba continues. The US war of attrition, initiated in 1962, has taken a crueler turn by prohibiting the entry of oil, food, and medicine – betting that the growing failure to provide basic services, coupled with efforts to bring about famine – will create the conditions conducive to the “seizure” of Cuba. Such actions are accompanied by attempts at sabotage and military or paramilitary aggression. Paradoxically, the main excuse continues to be “freedom,” “democracy,” and “the fight against drug trafficking” . . . while President Trump has pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, imprisoned for drug trafficking.

This journal supports all efforts of governments, such as Mexico’s, and various social and humanitarian organizations, to deliver food, medical supplies, and other necessities to the people of Cuba. Several of us have participated in collecting supplies and donations for the various convoys currently en route to this sister nation

As Social Medicine practitioners, we want to emphasize that in war, no one wins. Thousands suffer, die, or are maimed, and economies are destroyed as the material cost of life support increases, which is why we advocate for the immediate cessation of war and the unrestricted respect for the sovereignty of peoples. In order to protect human lives, health and environmental integrity we urge all scientific associations and social movements to endorse a global antiwar movement against imperialist greed and aggression.

Hasta la victoria siempre! Ever onward to victory

Guerra y Medicina Social

Como profesionales de la Medicina Social, nos posicionamos firmemente. Hemos visto a la sociedad civil y a las y los académicos esforzarse por convencer a la clase política de los EUA y de otros países, a no participar o dejar de participar en el genocidio, pero, hasta ahora, sus oídos han sido sordos. Reconocemos que el ente sionista llamado Israel no va a dejar de cometer crímenes de guerra y genocidios en el Oeste de Asia, a menos que se le obligue.

Nos posicionamos del lado de la paz, los derechos humanos y la equidad incondicionales, porque forman parte integral de los principios y la práctica comprometida de la Medicina Social. Por lo tanto, valoramos los esfuerzos hechos hasta ahora para detener los ataques y entregar ayuda humanitaria a Palestina, Líbano e Irán. También instamos a garantizar la protección a la salud, a las brigadas humanitarias y a la prensa internacional en un conflicto que sistemáticamente ha matado a quiénes luchan en contra de la desinformación o, simplemente, intentan salvar las vidas de civiles inocentes.

Acciones intencionales por parte de Israel han provocado muertes, lesiones y destrucción de las instalaciones necesarias para la supervivencia, y esto no sólo sucede en su región, también ha participado o apoyado militarmente otros genocidios y represiones de gobiernos en todo el mundo. Estas acciones han provocado efectos devastadores en la salud y en la supervivencia de muchos países de América del Sur, América Central, el Caribe, América del Norte, África, Asia y Oceanía. Israel ha descrito a Palestina como un “laboratorio” para probar armamento, sistemas de vigilancia, tácticas militares y estrategias con el fin de que su gobierno y sus empresas pueden venderlos a dictadores y gobiernos represivos alrededor del planeta.

Esta revista ha asumido antes una postura en contra del actual genocidio del pueblo palestino perpetrado por el gobierno de Israel; al 30 de marzo de 2026, es clara su flagrante ocupación de su territorio con base en apartheid. Ahora, pone en marcha una nueva ley que autoriza aplicar la pena de muerte como castigo para las y los palestinos, si son encontrados culpables de ataques mortales considerados como actos de terrorismo. Los EUA y la Unión Europea han financiado, provisto las armas uotorgado cobertura política a este genocidio. En la actualidad, los EUA se han unido con Israel para conformar un equipo que perpetra todo de tipo de agresiones a Irán y a Líbano. Como una de las primeras acciones de guerra, con dos misiles crucero Tomahawk, los EUA realizaron un doble ataque a una escuela primaria para niñas en Minab. Con el primer misil asesinaron a las niñas y a sus maestras; a continuación, 40 minutos más tarde, con el segundo, perecieron los miembros de sus familias, las y los vecinos, y los equipos de rescate, para sumar un total de cerca de 170 decesos de la población civil. Esto demuestra la determinación de los EUA de violar directamente la ley internacional, cometiendo crímenes de guerra, lo que ha sido la marca característica de ataques previos cometidos por Israel en la zona. De acuerdo con esta ley, los líderes de EUA e Israel debieran ser acusados por sus agresiones críminales y guerras innecesarias.

Como adherentes a la Medicina Social reconocemos la determinación social del proceso salud-enfermedad y de las muertes prematuras. No sólo examinamos las causas inmediatas, sino que también identificamos el impacto de las determinaciones sociales a gran escala. En la situación actual, identificamos una gran variedad de dichas determinaciones, incluyendo el uso del sionismo como principio de organización colonialista que ocupa y desaloja tierras palestinas. Las y los adherentes al sionismo incluyen al fundamentalismo cristiano. Adicionalmente, muchos militares estadounidenses han informado que sus oficiales están instando a sus tropas con exhortaciones de que están cumpliendo una misión divina, lo que explícitamente ha sido instruido por miembros del congreso y funcionarios del Departamento de Guerra. Del mismo modo, las autoridades israelíes aluden al “Gran Israel” como una justificación religiosa para perpetuar la guerra y las agresiones.

Como practicantes de la Medicina Social, nos es evidente que el imperio estadounidense está en declive, y la historia nos ha enseñado que la declinación de los imperios conlleva extralimitaciones. En este contexto, los EUA buscan perpetuar su hegemonía a través de violencia. A saber, iniciando esta guerra en contra de Irán, junto con su socio, están contribuyendo al declive del imperio. Esto está sucediendo de una forma generalizada, extrema y peligrosa, lo que puede conducir a una devastadora III Guerra Mundial (en su caso, posiblemente, la última).

Como profesionales de la Medicina Social, reconocemos que los costos de la guerra no son asumidos sólo por parte de las y los combatientes, sino que, cada vez más, también, y principalmente, por los pueblos. Cuando infraestructuras críticas, como los aeropuertos, el transporte marítimo, el transporte terrestre, el combustible, los fertilizantes, los alimentos, el agua, las plantas desalinizadoras, el saneamiento, la electricidad, los hospitales, las clínicas, las escuelas, etc., son destruidas por las bombas, para los pueblos es una condena de muerte, ya que no pueden accededer a lo que hace la vida posible. Mientras tanto, la guerra es promovida por el complejo industrial-militar, que se beneficia en gran medida con ella, escalando aún más las ya extremas desigualdades globales.

Al este del Golfo Pérsico, los países de Asia dependen del flujo de petróleo a través del estrecho de Ormuz, por lo que están en graves aprietos. Su gente y sus trabajadores migrantes ya están empezando a sentir el dolor de los efectos de su cierre.

En América, los EUA están violando flagrantemente todas las normas del derecho internacional. Han atacado y destruido embarcaciones civiles en aguas internacionales con fuego naval o misiles lanzados desde aviones. Han violado la soberanía de Venezuela, sabotearon su agua y sus plantas de energía, y lanzaron un ataque militar, hiriendo a muchos y asesinando a más de 75 venezolanos y cubanos para secuestrar ilegalmente al presidente Nicolás Maduro y a Cilia Flores, su esposa.

Las agresiones en contra Cuba continúan. Su desgaste, que inició en 1962, se ha tornado más cruel por la prohibición de la entrada de petróleo, alimentos y medicamentos, apostando a que la creciente incapacidad interna de contar con los servicios básicos, junto con los esfuerzos para provocar hambre, cree las condiciones propicias para la “confiscación” del país. Tales acciones están acompañadas por intentos de sabotaje y agresiones militares o paramilitares, como se demostró con la captura de una lancha rápida con armas y militares entrenados por personal estadounidense. Paradójicamente, la excusa principal para estas acciones sigue siendo: “libertad”, “democracia”, y “la lucha contra el tráfico de drogas” . . . mientras que el presidente Trump indulta al expresidente de Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernández, encarcelado precisamente por tráfico de drogas.

Esta revista apoya los esfuerzos de todos los gobiernos, tales como el de México, y de varias organizaciones sociales y humanitarias, para entregar alimentos, suministros médicos y otras necesidades para el pueblo cubano. Varios de nosotras y nosotros hemos participado en la recolección de suministros y donaciones para los diferentes convoyes en ruta hacia esta nación hermana.

Como adherentes a la Medicina Social, queremos enfatizar que en la guerra nadie gana. Miles sufren, mueren, o quedan con mutilaciones; las economías son destruidos al enfrentar el aumento del costo de los soportes de vida, lo cual se suma a las muchas razones por las que abogamos por el cese inmediato de la guerra y el respeto irrestricto a la soberanía de los pueblos.

Con el fin de proteger la vida, la salud y la integridad ambiental, instamos a todas las asociaciones científicas y a los movimientos sociales a sumarse al movimiento global en contra de esta guerra imperialista, su codicia y sus agresiones. ¡!

Hasta la victoria siempre! Ever onward to victory. 

Social Medicine/Medicina Social is a bilingual online journal dedicated to Health for All.

New Gangsters for Capitalism



 May 6, 2026

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

Some lawmakers have grown so alarmed by the Trump administration’s actions in Latin America that they are beginning to accuse the administration of gangsterism.

Representative Stephen Lynch (D-MA) saw the possibility of gangsterism at the start of the second Trump administration when he warned that the United States could “join the ranks of gangster nations,” but there is a growing sense in Congress that the day has arrived.

At a congressional hearing last month, Representative Joaquin Castro (D-TX) asserted that the Trump administration is exploiting the U.S. military to take Latin American resources for U.S. corporations. Castro seemingly channeled the anti-war critiques of Smedley Butler, the U.S. military hero of the early twentieth century, who condemned war as a racket and lamented his exploitation as a racketeer for capitalism.

“For decades, our men and women in uniform who volunteered to protect our country became mercenaries ordered to risk their lives to protect the profits of U.S. corporations,” Castro said. “Today, President Trump is ordering them to do so again.”

The Case of Venezuela

The Trump administration’s critics in Congress have been warning about the administration’s gangsterism due to its actions in Venezuela.

Since the Trump administration directed a military operation earlier this year to seize Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and take control of the country’s oil and minerals, several lawmakers have suggested that the administration has begun to employ force and intimidation as its basic tools of statecraft.

Lawmakers have condemned the administration for conducting a military operation without congressional approval, meddling in Venezuela’s internal politics, displaying contempt for Venezuela’s political process, facilitating corruption in Venezuela and the United States, and using the U.S. military to take control of Venezuela’s resources.

“You are taking their oil at gunpoint,” Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) told Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier this year.

Although Congress has not held the president accountable, as the Republican majority in each chamber supports the president, critics have kept pressure on the White House, prompting officials to defend the administration’s actions.

At the congressional hearing last month, State Department official Michael Kozak claimed that the intervention in Venezuela advanced U.S. interests. He cited the Monroe Doctrine, which marks Latin America as a sphere of influence. Like the president, he boasted that the United States now controls the country’s resources.

“We’ve got very significant control over the oil revenues at this point,” Kozak said.

Several Democratic lawmakers responded with strong criticisms. They condemned the Trump administration for acting so aggressively in the hemisphere, and they warned that its actions would create a backlash against the United States.

Representative Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA) described the administration’s approach as “shameful.” She insisted that the United States should not be “reviving a policy of domination and subjugation in the Western Hemisphere through the Monroe Doctrine.”

Castro repeated his warning that the Trump administration is focused on commerce and profits. He suggested that the president is using the U.S. military to enrich people close to him.

“What has happened now is that there’s a group of folks that the president favors in his circle that is able to commence commerce and make money off of, whether it’s valuable minerals, oil, anything else in Venezuela,” Castro said.

Kozak expressed disagreement with Castro’s analysis, but he acknowledged that the Trump administration has established significant controls over Venezuela. Once again, he boasted that the Trump administration controls the country’s resources.

“People can lift oil and sell it on the open market, but all that money goes into an account that we have control over,” Kozak said. “All the revenues that are coming from the mining sector and everything, instead of going into their bank accounts, are coming into the Treasury accounts, and then we can dole it out as we see fit.”

The Case of Cuba

Now that the Trump administration has moved against Venezuela, establishing new leadership and doling out profits from its resources, lawmakers anticipate that it will move against Cuba next.

For months, Trump has been openly threatening Cuba. He has moved to block oil shipments to the country, causingan economic crisis. Knowing that he has put tremendous pressure on the Cuban government, he has demanded that the country’s president leave office.

“I do believe I’ll be having the honor of taking Cuba,” Trump said in March. “I think I could do anything I want with it, if you want to know the truth.”

Although the Trump administration’s military intervention in Iran has shifted its focus away from Cuba, the administration is maintaining an economic stranglehold over the island nation, making its recovery impossible. The U.S. military continues blocking the free flow of oil to Cuba, even while Trump demands the free flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. The few oil shipments that have reached Cuba, for instance a recent tanker from Russia, have provided little relief.

At the congressional hearing last month, several lawmakers argued that the Trump administration is a major reason why Cuba is facing such tremendous hardship, including island-wide blackouts and preventable deaths at hospitals and health clinics.

“We cannot ignore our own country’s role in the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Cuba,” Castro said.

Representative Jonathan Jackson (D-IL), who recently visited the country, made the strongest criticisms. Warning that the administration’s policies are causing tremendous harm to the Cuban people, he indicated that the Trump administration is violating international humanitarian law.

“We have engaged in collective punishment,” Jackson said.

The congressman also accused the Trump administration of trying to make life so miserable for the Cuban people that they would rise up and overthrow the Cuban government. He described it as a failed “policy of starving” Cuba.

“It was one of the most cruel things I had ever seen in my life,” he said.

Just as the Trump administration has been able to get away with its actions in Venezuela, however, it has been able to continue its policies toward Cuba. The administration maintains support among Republicans and some Democrats, few of whom oppose the administration’s goal of regime change.

The president, who knows that he faces little opposition in Congress, continues threatening to direct a military intervention in Cuba, even citing the operation in Venezuela as a precedent.

“In January, our warriors flew straight into the heart of the Venezuelan capital, captured the outlawed dictator Nicolás Maduro, and brought him to face American justice,” Trump said last month. “And very soon this great strength will also bring about a day 70 years in waiting. It’s called, ‘A New Dawn for Cuba.’”

War Is a Racket

When Smedley Butler spoke against his exploitation as a racketeer for capitalism nearly a century ago, he made a criticism of the American way of war that was considered to be so radical by U.S. leaders that it has been largely excluded from mainstream political discourse.

Only a few politicians, such as former Representatives Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) and Ron Paul (R-TX), have cited Butler and his warnings. Rarely, if ever, does the mass media report on war as a racket in which the country’s leaders are exploiting U.S. military forces as gangsters for capitalism.

Today, however, some elected leaders are beginning to issue the same kinds of warnings about the Trump administration. Alarmed by the president’s insatiable lust for wealth and power, they are starting to suggest that the president is engaging in a kind of gangsterism across Latin America. The president, they say, is using the power of the U.S. military to steal the wealth of Latin American countries to enrich himself, his family, his closest business associates, and U.S. corporations.

“By any measure, this is the most corrupt administration in American history,” Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) saidearlier this year.

Now that the Trump administration is openly pillaging Venezuela and getting away with it, several lawmakers are warning that it may apply the same approach to other Latin American countries.

“It’s making me think that the goal in Cuba is going to be the same,” Castro said at the hearing in April. “It’s who’s going to go over there that’s friends with the president to make money and who’s going to profit off of Cuba and the Cuban people.”

Indeed, there is a growing sense in Congress that the Trump administration is turning to gangsterism. Moving beyond standard establishment critiques of the president’s contempt for norms and traditions, critics are giving serious consideration to the idea that Trump’s wars are a racket and that Cuba may be next.

This first appeared on FPIF.

Edward Hunt writes about war and empire. He has a PhD in American Studies from the College of William & Mary.