It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Thursday, November 02, 2023
Schumer and other Senate Democrats call for a federal probe of huge oil deals by Exxon and Chevron
MATTHEW DALY Wed, November 1, 2023
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., listens during a news conference On Capitol Hill Wednesday, Nov. 1, 2023, in Washington.
(AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Majority Leader and 22 other Democratic senators are urging federal regulators to investigate multibillion-dollar acquisitions by oil giants ExxonMobil and Chevron, saying the deals could lead to higher prices at the gas pump.
“These deals are likely to harm competition, risking increased consumer prices and reduced output throughout the United States,'' the senators wrote. The deals threaten to harm small operators and suppress wages, they added.
The letter is signed by 23 senators, including Minnesota Sen. , chair of the Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel, and antitrust hawks such as Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and of Vermont.
While supporters have argued that the global market for oil and gas is so large that even dominant firms such as Exxon or Chevron cannot restrict global capacity, "the FTC must consider how Exxon’s or Chevron’s vertically integrated operations may harm American competition in spite of the global market," the senators wrote.
A spokesman for the FTC said the agency had received the letter but declined further comment.
Chevron, Exxon and other oil companies have announced huge profits from strong energy prices and demand since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Exxon reported $9.1 billion in profits in the quarter that ended Sept. 30, while Chevron reported $6.5 billion in profits.
Exxon said in a statement that the proposed deal with Texas-based Pioneer Resources would enhance U.S. energy security and benefit the American economy and consumers.
“For all those concerned about competition, the fact that the two companies combined represent about 5% of U.S. oil production should set their mind at ease. For all those who seek even greater U.S. energy independence and far lower emissions, this merger represents nothing but upside for our economy and our environment,'' the company said.
Chevron said its proposed deal with New York-based Hess would strengthen long-term performance while "delivering higher returns and lower carbon” dioxide emissions that contribute to global warming.
Both deals must be approved by federal regulators.
Environmental groups hailed the call for an investigation of what some called “merger mania” within the oil industry that threatens competition.
“Big Oil getting bigger is a threat to our climate and our democracy,'' said Lukas Ross, senior program manager at Friends of the Earth. “The proposed mergers would supercharge Exxon and Chevron’s outsized political power, allowing them to lock-in another generation" of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, he said. “The FTC has every reason to act.”
A spokeswoman for the American Petroleum Institute, the oil industry’s top lobbying group, said the proposed mergers would increase production and improve environmental performance.
“Instead of focusing on stale partisan talking points, we should focus on protecting America’s energy security at a time of global unrest and lifting regulatory barriers that are hurting consumers,” API's Bethany Williams said.
Schumer and other Democrats also targeted the oil industry last year, as they made a failed bid to give the FTC increased authority to crack down on companies that engage in price gouging. Responding to concerns about high gasoline prices, Democrats said the FTC needs more tools, including stiffer fines and penalties and a team of dedicated experts to monitor markets and go after price gouging.
A bill to crack down on price gouging was not approved in the last Congress. A similar bill is pending before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.
People Claim a Majority of Palestiniansin Gaza Elected Hamas — Here's Why It Isn'tThat Simple Nur Ibrahim Wed, November 1, 2023
As the Israel-Gaza crisis intensified in October 2023, various claims about the conflict circulated devoid of important historical context. One such claim argued the majority of Palestinians in Gaza elected Hamas, a Sunni Islamist political party and military organization that's considered a terrorist group by the U.S. and European Union (EU) — implying that most of today's population support the militant group’s actions toward Israel.
For instance, a post by former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett stated that when Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005, Palestinians supposedly had the opportunity to turn it into "an amazing and beautiful state." Instead, he wrote, "A majority of Palestinians voted Hamas whose explicit goal is to destroy Israel," and Hamas' subsequent rocket firing, according to Bennett, forced the Israeli military to form a blockade on the Gaza Strip.
Another post on X (formerly Twitter) by Eugene Kontorovich, a law professor at George Mason University, said, “Fact check: the majority of Palestinian people in Gaza elected Hamas, which ran on a kill-all-the-Jews platform; and it remains widely popular in Gaza.” (We reached out to Kontorovich for comment, and his response will be summarized below.)
(Screenshot via Twitter)
Those posts omitted important context. It was true that Hamas won the latest election among Palestinians in Gaza — it happened in 2006 — though that victory was not by a majority of votes. The militant group did, however, win the majority of seats in the legislature. Furthermore, it was misleading to conflate that electoral outcome with the views of people in the region today.
Below, we explain how elections work in the region, Hamas' electoral history and campaign strategies, and Palestinians' view of the military group as of early October 2023 based on survey data.
The Growth of Hamas
The last election in Gaza occurred around 17 years ago, in 2006. The election saw a political split between the secular Fatah (a branch of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO)) that dominated the PLO since the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, and the Islamist Hamas that formed in 1987 as an offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.
Hamas in its early days, according to former Israeli officials, was seen by the government of Israel as a counterweight to the PLO. Israel supported Hamas as a way to break the PLO's hold on the region. Retired official Avner Cohen, who worked in Gaza in the 1990s and oversaw religious affairs in the region, told the WSJ in 2009, “Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation." That report continued:
The Israeli government officially recognized a precursor to Hamas called Mujama Al Islamiya, registering the group as a charity. It allowed Mujama members to set up an Islamic university and build mosques, clubs and schools. Crucially, Israel often stood aside when the Islamists and their secular left-wing Palestinian rivals battled, sometimes violently, for influence in both Gaza and the West Bank.
Israeli officials, however, disagree that they should be blamed for Hamas' growth. Instead, they argue outsiders like Iran helped the military group ascend. (Iran, as of this writing, continued to be a major backer of the organization.)
In recent decades, liberating historic Palestine was the goal of Hamas’ military wing. Hamas' military wing carried out suicide bombings against the Israeli military and civilians until 2005, before running in the 2006 election, provided social-welfare programs to Palestinians who suffered under Israeli occupation.
The 2006 Election
In the 2006 election, Ismail Haniyeh led Hamas as the head of Hamas' parliamentary bloc, while the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA), Mahmoud Abbas, led Fatah, as well as the PLO and Palestinian National Authority (PNA). (Haniyeh is now chairman of Hamas' political bureau, and Abbas remains in his positions, as of this writing.) With Haniyeh at the helm, Hamas won around 44% of the votes across the region, according to a 2006 ABC News report, a total that secured a majority of seats in the legislature under election rules.
The election — which was reported to be free and fair, according to the National Democratic Institute (NDI) — used plurality voting, which is an electoral system in which candidates win by securing more votes than any other opponent, regardless of whether that total is a majority share of votes. Additionally, the election used proportional representation, an electoral system that allocates seats in proportion to votes, according to the European Council on Foreign Relations’ (ECFR).
Fair Vote, a nonpartisan voting-reform organization, broke down the electoral process like this (emphasis ours):
Of the country's 132 parliamentary seats, 66 are elected in a proportional, national party list system and 66 are elected in nine districts on an at-large plurality basis (with districts having between 1 and 9 seats, and voters having the power to cast as many votes as seats in a districts). While the national list seat distribution of seats provides a reasonable reflection of the national list voters, the district seat distribution is strongly skewed in favor of Hamas. Although vote totals from all districts show Hamas with only slightly more support than Fatah, the nature of a winner-take-all system combined with spoiler dynamics in certain districts allowed Hamas to win a far greater share of seats than votes in the legislature.
And in the backdrop of the 2006 election were geographic and political divides between Gaza and the West Bank. Contrary to what Bennett claimed, Israel restricted Palestinians from moving in and out of Gaza, as well as between the strip and the West Bank, since at least the 1990s, after the first Palestinian Intifada, or uprising, according to Al Jazeera. In addition to Gaza's borders, the Israeli government controlled its coastline and airspace, allowing for military incursions into the territory, and, in 2007, established the blockade on goods and people that still exists as of this writing.
In other words, at the time of the 2006 election, Gazans were living in a severely restricted environment.
Hamas’ Anti-Semitism and Public Comments on Israel
Per the viral tweet by Kontorovich above, Hamas allegedly ran on a “kill-all-Jews” platform preceding its 2006 election victory.
Hamas’ 1988 charter contained anti-Semitic statements such as, "Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious," and this charter remained in place ahead of the 2006 elections. Israel and organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) say anti-Semitism was, and is, a major characteristic of Hamas. However, just a fortnight before the 2006 elections and, in part, to appeal to the mainstream Palestinian position of "building a state within the boundaries of the occupied territories," Hamas removed its call for the destruction of Israel from its election manifesto, according to The Guardian coverage from the time.
However, according to Hugh Lovatt, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) and author of the ECFR's “Mapping Palestinian Politics” interactive research tool, Hamas did not win the 2006 election solely due to its anti-Semitic views. Rather, its success stemmed from campaign promises of “change and reform.”
Palestinians were fed up with corruption among Fatah leadership, according to Lovatt and news reports from the time. Ami Ayalon, a former head of Israeli intelligence, told The New York Times in 2006: “When they chose Hamas, it is more because of the corruption and failure of the Palestinian Authority and Fatah than because of religion or terrorism.”
Al Jazeera also noted in 2006, “Hamas capitalized on widespread discontent with years of Fatah corruption and ineffectiveness. Much of its campaign focused on internal Palestinian issues, while playing down the conflict with Israel.”
According to a survey conducted months after the 2006 election, Palestinian voters wanted Hamas to adopt a reconciliatory approach toward Israel. While Hamas’ popularity overall had grown, voters wanted a “two-state solution [with] mutual recognition of Israel as the state for the Jewish people in exchange for an Israeli recognition of Palestine as the state for the Palestinian people," according to the survey, which was administered by the independent West Bank-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCSPR).
A 2017 policy document described by Al Jazeera and The Guardian as Hamas' latest charter has less extreme language than the 1988 screed, stating, “Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion.”
Why Palestinian Territories Haven't Had an Election Since 2006
According to Lovatt, Palestinian territories have not had an election since 2006, for three reasons:
Other countries such as the U.S. rejected Hamas' 2006 election victory, deepening political tensions in Gaza and the West Bank. “[The international community] wants Hamas to recognize Israel, denounce violence, and commit to the Oslo Accords, which Hamas cannot do explicitly,” Lovatt said, referring to referring to the seminal 1990s agreements which saw both sides recognize each other for the first time, and would see the formation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
Abbas has a fear of losing elections again. “They [Fatah] do not want to lose again. Elections [in Palestinian territories] are quite embarrassing for Fatah [and] exacerbate existing internal divisions.”
The Israeli government's intervention has "fractured Palestinian national movements," he said. "[The Israelis] want to foster divisions between the two regions [Gaza and the West Bank], and do not want unified Palestinian leadership."
A Palestinian legislative election was set to take place in May 2021, but Abbas postponed it indefinitely, citing Israel's refusal to include East Jerusalem in the elections. (East Jerusalem was annexed by Israel in contravention of international law.) UN experts sided with Abbas, demanding that Palestinians in East Jerusalem be allowed to participate.
Israel’s refusal to let people in East Jerusalem vote in the planned election “gave [Abbas] an excuse to not allow elections that year,” Lovatt said, and that helped him avoid another loss. At that point, Palestinians perceived Abbas’ government as corrupt, authoritarian, and propped up by international donors, according to Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera reported how postponing the May 2021 election(s) further reduced support for Abbas among Palestinians.
Voting Blocks That Weren't Included In 2006
When considering Hamas' win in 2006, this fact is crucial: Almost half of Palestinians in Gaza in 2023 could not vote in the 2006 elections because of their youth (the voting age is 18). Per previous reporting by Snopes, which relied on demographic data compiled by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, children and teens under the age of 18 were estimated to represent about 47% of the Gaza Strip's population, as of mid-2023.
Furthermore, today’s population in Gaza also includes adults who were not old enough to vote in 2006. In 2006, around 840,000 citizens were under the age of 18 out of a population of 1.4 million, according to UNICEF.
It is also important to note that, while Hamas won among voters in Gaza in 2006, people in the West Bank never voted the militant group into power. Yet, as of this writing, Hamas' war with Israel has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank at the hands of the Israeli military, or Israeli settlers.
Survey Data Showing the Extent of Hamas' Support In Recent Years
There was no comprehensive, nonpartisan data to definitively measure Palestinians' support for Hamas in 2023, and numerous polls conducted within months of each other showed shifting views among Palestinians based on the circumstances and timing.
According to one survey that was conducted just days before the 2023 war broke out, about 44% of respondents said they had no trust in Hamas, while 29% said they have a "great deal" of trust. That poll by Arab Barometer included 790 people in the West Bank and 399 people in Gaza, roughly one-quarter of whom said they would vote for Haniyeh in a hypothetical, future election. Additionally, most people who answered the survey (73%) said they did not share Hamas' goal of eliminating Israel.
Months earlier, a PCPSR poll in June 2023 found that if presidential elections were to be held between Fatah’s Abbas and Hamas’ Haniyeh, Haniyeh would likely win 56% of the vote to Abbas’ 33%. That survey polled 1270 adults interviewed in 127 randomly selected locations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. However, according to that survey, less than half of respondents (46%) said they would participate in the voting if Abbas and Haniyeh were the only candidates. On the other hand, if the candidates were to run in parliamentary elections, Hamas would likely get 34% of the popular vote, compared to Fatah’s 31%, according to the poll. The survey also found a majority of participants supported the formation of armed groups independent of the Palestinian Authority.
When we reached out to Kontorovich, who claimed in a tweet displayed above that most Palestinians in Gaza supported Hamas and its "kill-all-the-Jews" platform to this day, he cited a July 2023 survey by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) that found 57% of Gazans have at least a somewhat positive opinion of Hamas. That poll included "1,000 citizens in Arab countries," and "at least 500 residents each in the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem." That same survey stated Gazans were frustrated with Hamas governance and majority of Gazans (70%) supported a proposal of the PA sending “officials and security officers to Gaza to take over the administration there, with Hamas giving up separate armed units." (We should note: WINEP was formed by a former president of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a pro-Israel lobby, and has been described in the book "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" by professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt as a pro-Israel think tank.
Kontorovich also pointed to a PCPSRpoll in June 2021, after the breakout of another war in Gaza, in which around 53% of 1200 respondents interviewed in Gaza and West Bank respondents said Hamas was "most deserving" of representing the Palestinian people. (In that report, PCPSR's head pollster noted such surges in Hamas' support often occur during confrontations and then dissipate months later.)
According to Lovatt, a significant proportion of the Palestinian population does not support either party, though Fatah and Hamas' hold on the region does not allow for alternatives. “In the West Bank [for example], it is impossible to register a new political party. If you can't legally register a party, you can't get funding, if you can't get funding, you can’t organize for elections,” he told us.
Al Tahhan, Zena. "Hamas vs Fatah: Same Goal, Different Approaches." Al Jazeera, Oct. 12, 2017. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/10/12/hamas-and-fatah-how-are-the-two-groups-different. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“Biden Condemns Retaliatory Attacks by Israeli Settlers against Palestinians in the West Bank.” AP News, 25 Oct. 2023, https://apnews.com/article/biden-west-bank-settlers-israel-hamas-war-0a2f38878720c962a20d9286315cde94. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Erlanger, Steven. “Victory Ends 40 Years of Political Domination by Arafat’s Party.” The New York Times, 26 Jan. 2006. NYTimes.com, https://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/26/international/middleeast/victory-ends-40-years-of-political-domination-by.html. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"Gaza: Armed Palestinian Groups Commit Grave Crimes." Human Rights Watch. 12 June 2007, https://www.hrw.org/news/2007/06/12/gaza-armed-palestinian-groups-commit-grave-crimes. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"Gaza Disengagement Plan: Text of the Sharon Plan." Jewish Virtual Library, Apr. 2004, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/text-of-the-gaza-disengagement-plan. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“Hamas: The Palestinian Militant Group That Rules Gaza.” BBC News, 9 May 2011. www.bbc.com, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-13331522. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Higgins, Andrew. “How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas.” Wall Street Journal, 24 Jan. 2009. www.wsj.com, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123275572295011847. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"International Community Must Act to End Israel’s Annexation of Occupied West Bank, Including East Jerusalem, and Defend International Law: UN Experts." United Nations Human Rights Office of the Commissioner, 26 July 2023, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/07/international-community-must-act-end-israels-annexation-occupied-west-bank. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"Israel: “Disengagement” Will Not End Gaza Occupation." Human Rights Watch. 28 Oct. 2004, https://www.hrw.org/news/2004/10/28/israel-disengagement-will-not-end-gaza-occupation. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"It’s The Election System, Stupid: The Misleading Hamas Majority and the System That Created It." Fair Vote, https://archive.fairvote.org/media/pep/Palestine.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Lovatt, Hugh. “Back to Democracy: Europe, Hamas, and the Palestinian Elections.” ECFR, 18 Mar. 2021, https://ecfr.eu/publication/back-to-democracy-europe-hamas-and-the-palestinian-elections/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Lovatt, Hugh. Phone Interview with Hugh Lovatt of ECFR. 19 Oct. 2023. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“Mahmoud Abbas (President).” ECFR, 23 Mar. 2018, https://ecfr.eu/special/mapping_palestinian_politics/mahmoud_abbas/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
McGreal, Chris. “Hamas Drops Call for Destruction of Israel from Manifesto.” The Guardian, 12 Jan. 2006. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jan/12/israel. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Mearsheimer, John J., and Stephen M. Walt. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007. Internet Archive, http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780374177720. Accessed 1 Nov. 2023.
Michaelson, Ruth, and Sufian Taha. “‘They Want Revenge. They’re Saying, Either We Die or You Die’: West Bank Residents Fear Rising Tide of Violence.” The Observer, 15 Oct. 2023. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/15/they-want-revenge-theyre-saying-either-we-die-or-you-die-west-bank-residents-fear-rising-tide-of-violence. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“More than 100 Palestinians Killed in West Bank amid Gaza War.” France 24, 25 Oct. 2023, https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231025-more-than-100-palestinians-killed-in-west-bank-amid-gaza-war. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"Palestinian Election: Free, Fair, Democratic and Credible Vote Must Include East Jerusalem – UN Experts." United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 26 July 2021, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2021/07/palestinian-election-free-fair-democratic-and-credible-vote-must-include. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“Palestinians Open Election Registration Offices in West Bank and Gaza.” Reuters, 10 Feb. 2021. www.reuters.com, https://www.reuters.com/article/palestinians-politics-election-int-idUSKBN2AA1S7. Accessed 1 Nov. 2023.
"Public Opinion Poll No (88)." Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, June 2023, https://www.pcpsr.org/sites/default/files/Poll%2088%20English%20full%20text%20June%202023.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Sayedahmed, Dina and Mehdi Hasan. “Blowback: How Israel Went From Helping Create Hamas to Bombing It.” The Intercept, 19 Feb. 2018, https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/hamas-israel-palestine-conflict/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Tharoor, Ishaan. “Analysis | The Election That Led to Hamas Taking over Gaza.” Washington Post, 24 Oct. 2023. www.washingtonpost.com, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/24/gaza-election-hamas-2006-palestine-israel/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Tharoor, Ishaan. “How Israel Helped Create Hamas.” Washington Post, 1 Dec. 2021. www.washingtonpost.com, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/07/30/how-israel-helped-create-hamas/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"The Final Results for the Electoral Lists." Central Elections Commission Palestine, http://www.elections.ps/pdf/Final_Results_PLC_Summary_Lists_Seats_2_En.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“The Gaza Bombshell.” Vanity Fair, 3 Mar. 2008, https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/04/gaza200804. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
"The Second 2006 PLC Elections: The Final Distribution of PLC Seats." Central Election Commission Palestine, https://www.elections.ps/Portals/0/pdf/The%20final%20distribution%20of%20PLC%20seats.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“What Is Gaza’s Ministry of Health and How Does It Calculate the War’s Death Toll?” AP News, 26 Oct. 2023, https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-war-gaza-health-ministry-health-death-toll-59470820308b31f1faf73c703400b033. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
“What Is Hamas? The Group That Rules the Gaza Strip Has Fought Several Rounds of War with Israel.” AP News, 9 Oct. 2023, https://apnews.com/article/hamas-gaza-palestinian-authority-israel-war-ed7018dbaae09b81513daf3bda38109a. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
Wintour, Patrick. “Hamas Presents New Charter Accepting a Palestine Based on 1967 Borders.” The Guardian, 1 May 2017. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/01/hamas-new-charter-palestine-israel-1967-borders. Accessed 30 Oct. 2023.
Wrona, Aleksandra. “Were 50% of People in Palestine Children, as of Mid-2023?” Snopes, 16 Oct. 2023, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/50-percent-of-palestinians-children/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2023.
