LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment

It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)

Sunday, February 09, 2025

Class notes

Muna Khan 
DAWN
The writer is a journalism instructor.

I AM back in the classroom, teaching a news media literacy course at a university, and after two classes, I feel hopeful. Since I began teaching journalism and news media courses eight years ago, there are many changes I’ve been happy to see: more women enrolling in the degree or class. They are always smarter (sorry guys) and more inquisitive, but also sadly, more reluctant to join the news industry.

There are other observations I’d like to share, which I hope will help news media managers and owners with audience insight.

When I last taught this course in fall 2023, I saw glimpses of a post-Imran generation, a large pocketful of students disenchanted by his promises of a Naya Pakistan. This time, however, the sentiment against all politicians, including Imran, is more pronounced. That disenchantment isn’t just limited to politicians. For example, we reviewed an old poll about Pakistanis’ trust in institutions where the army and Supreme Court ranked at the top and the class said they doubted this would hold true today. The media fared poorly then and now.

“It’s because the media only shows negativity,” one girl said.

Were they up for the task of changing?

In a bid for them to understand how the news works, I ask them to create the front page of a newspaper. It is always their first assignment. If we’re so bad in the news media, how would you do it differently? The goal is simple: your front page must inform audiences of news you deem important. Students have to choose five stories for their paper’s front page. They do it as individuals and then, in the next class, in small groups where they inevitably differ among themselves on which stories to place. It is a really good introduction to news value and judgement. Later in the class, we revisit the exercise but this time with the intent to sell newspapers.

If we’re so bad in the news media, how would you do it differently?

It’s a fun exercise because we learn there is no one-size-fits all editorial judgement. Their responses are always full of surprises and tell you a lot about what they’re thinking, where they’re coming from, and about their — and their family’s — habits. As the years pass, I’m encountering more students whose families do not subscribe to newspapers unless they have grandparents; parents, too, consume news on mobile devices. Almost everyone’s family still watches the news on TV but it’s no longer the only source of information. TV for breaking news followed by YouTube for analysis. My students do not watch news on TV though they may come across it on their feeds.

It is against this backdrop that I felt hopeful about their front pages. Many ran with Imran’s conviction as their top story, but they explained they had to do so because audiences had to be informed. Several students ran the devastating story about the seven-year-old boy’s body discovered in an underground water tanker in Karachi as their top story. This, they defended, was more important than everything else. The violence in Kurram and stories about the economy figured in their lists too. Only one student had a story about Balochistan and he said he specifically chose it because the province was ignored. An equally important story, by their standards, was PIA apologising for their ad about resumption of flights to Paris.

Each student chose at least one, if not more, story that showcased empathy for the vulnerable, which included the environment. Almost everyone had the resurgence of Covid in their top three stories. I’d forgotten just how impacted this group was by the pandemic. Finally, they each chose a story that represented hope or something positive, something to feel good about, as they said. One student was horrified when I said one motorcyclist’s death on Ka­­rachi’s Sharea Fai­sal did not qualify as important; they said my desensitisation was the problem. Sometimes you have to take a stand, another said. Their assignments showed they were standing up for the voiceless.

When I pointed out they were more political than they claimed, more aware about their surroundings than they admitted, I felt there was a collective nod. I’m sad how politics has been reduced, in their minds, to the content on our prime time shows, which they don’t even watch.

Of course, this is not representative of an entire generation. As I stated up front, these are observations of a small urban group, whose families are relatively well-to-do; they are aware of their privilege and access to power. They know right from wrong but they do not trust the media to help inform them. Many told me they’ve signed up for my class because they want to understand how the media works and I hope they will teach me how it can work effectively. We need this generation to shape our future.

X: *LedeingLady*

Published in Dawn, January 26th, 2025
EUGENE PLAWIUK at 6:43 PM No comments:
Share
Writing on the wall

Anjum Altaf 
DAWN

The writer is the author of Pakistan: Clash of Ideas, Aks Publications 2024.

MOMENTOUS political events have been occurring in the region — Afghan­is­tan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Sy­­ria. Much has been written about each one of them in isolation; very little about what they represent collectively. This oversight can cause us to miss some essential insights into the contours of the emerging world.


Despite their individual dynamics, one can discern some obviously common features in these independent events. Consider all the above-named countries except for Myanmar; in each one of them the rulers were compelled to make last-minute escapes into exile by forces opposed to their authoritarianism. In three of them the rulers had been well-entrenched for years and seemingly impregnable — Sheikh Hasina in Bangladesh for 15 years, the Rajapaksas in Sri Lanka for 20, the Assads in Syria for over 50.


Consider also the speed at which the changes occurred when they finally did; a few months in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, a few weeks in Syria. It also did not matter how well or poorly the countries were doing economically. There was near collapse in Afghanistan but remarkable achievements in Bangladesh, which had outpaced its neighbours according to many standard indicators. Economics and politics had become quite disconnected; people had unmet aspirations that went beyond material gains.

Oppressive rule reinforces popular resentment that cannot be suppressed forever.

Of course, the change did not materialise out of thin air; it was building up over time largely unnoticed and seemingly under control. For the rulers, it was always a few ‘miscreants’ creating trouble or some foreign hand that would be dealt a crushing blow. This was palpably untrue, but a fiction that was sustainable as long as some key region remained loyal to the regime. When dissent breached that zone of support, it was as if an invisible tipping point was crossed and the defensive walls crumbled rapidly and almost without resistance.

Even significant differences within the countries point clearly in one direction. External forces were indeed involved in Afghanistan and Syria, but that was not the case in either Sri Lanka or Bangladesh. This suggests that external intervention is not necessary for the overthrow of authoritarian and unpopular regimes; purely internal dynamics can be sufficient to remove regimes lacking legitimacy. Oppressive rule reinforces popular resentment that cannot be suppressed forever. An implosion is inevitable, only a matter of time.

One might note that of the countries mentioned above, none except Myanmar was under military rule. It could be argued that this might explain why their rulers were overthrown without prolonged conflict. But even in Myanmar the military is on the defensive, continuing to lose ground to rebel forces. This suggests that the military can delay the inevitable but not necessarily foreclose the outcome.

This conclusion is readily borne out by history. There was a period not so long ago when military rule was common — across Latin America, in Africa, Turkiye, and South Korea. Now it is an endangered species. It survives in a few holdouts like Neanderthals must have done before they became extinct. Or like dinosaurs whose small brains prevented them from negotiating the increasing complexity of their environment. In either case, to those with open eyes, the writing is visible on the wall.

What matters is not how long autocratic regimes survive but what they leave behind. Progressive forces survived in Sri Lanka despite the purges of the Rajapaksas; Bangladesh had an iconic individual around whom the opposition could come together. Afghanistan, Myanmar and Syria appear a lot more chaotic. They are like a few other holdouts, yet to witness change, where progressives have been decimated and there are no individuals left with the stature to command universal respect and trust. In such cases, descent into prolonged civil war — as in Sudan — or takeover by fundamentalist groups — as in Afghanistan — re­­mains a very real outcome.

The conclusion one can derive from these case studies is that change is inevitable; nothing can last forever if the aspirations of the people are denied or crushed beyond a point. It is also clear that some forms of rule are outdated and harmful and destined for the dust heap of history. What remains unknown is the shape authoritarian rulers will leave the polity in before they are forced to board the plane. What is less to be doubted is that the longer they last the worse would be the outcome.

At the same time, it is equally clear that autocrats would fight to the last to protect their privileges, even at the cost of breaking up their countries and pushing them into darkness and ignorance. Those who gratuitously advise them to reform should reflect on the lessons of history to realise their naivete.


Published in Dawn, January 25th, 2025
EUGENE PLAWIUK at 6:43 PM No comments:
Share
Trudeau Caught on Hot Mic Revealing Trump’s Plans for Canada

Joey McFadden
Fri, February 7, 2025
DAILY BEAST


Nicholas Kamm / AFP via Getty Images

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told business leaders that U.S. President Donald Trump’s interest in annexing Canada was a very real plan aimed at controlling the country’s vast mineral resources.

Trudeau was caught on a hot mic giving his assessment of Trump’s threat to take control of America’s northern neighbor.

“I suggest that not only does the Trump administration know how many critical minerals we have but that may be even why they keep talking about absorbing us and making us the 51st state,” he said. “They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have, and they very much want to be able to benefit from those. But Mr. Trump has it in mind that one of the easiest ways of doing that is absorbing our country. And it is a real thing.”

These remarks were made after Trudeau ushered the media out of the room. He continued to talk about his “conversation” with Trump, then realized the mic was still on, and ordered a staffer to turn off the recording device.

Canadian Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne believes Trump’s tough talk about annexing Canada is a negotiation tactic. He says Canada is not changing its strategy around critical minerals.

“They need us more than ever. They understand, particularly the military guys, they are very worried about strategy in terms of being their partner, in terms of critical minerals, yeah,” he said. “I would say this is a great leverage for Canada, because the military folks understand that they cannot rebuild their industrial base, their defense, military industrial base, without Canada.”




Unifor President Lana Payne, a union leader concerned about annexation and tariffs, says she is “taking everything seriously right now because I have a lot of members whose jobs are at stake in this climate of chaos and instability.”


Trudeau says Trump is serious about wanting to annex Canada

Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Fri, February 7, 2025 
THE GUARDIAN


The Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, speaks to business and labour leaders amid the looming threat of US protectionism in Toronto on Friday.Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters

Donald Trump’s recent fixation on absorbing Canada is “a real thing”, Justin Trudeau has told business leaders, warning that the US president wants access to his northern neighbour’s vast supply of critical minerals.

The outgoing prime minister was in Toronto for a hastily called summit of business and labour leaders, seeking to coordinate a response Trump’s looming threat of a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports.

Earlier this week, Trump backed away from tariffs that would have devastated Canada’s economy, granting one of his country’s largest trading partners a 30-day reprieve for further negotiations.

Related: ‘Buy Canadian Instead’: businesses vow to fight Trump’s tariffs across the border


But he has continued to mock Canadian sovereignty, repeating his description of the country as the “51st state” on social media and repeatedly calling Trudeau “governor” instead of prime minister.

Friday’s summit included discussions on stemming the movement of fentanyl, security at the border and the challenge of interprovincial trade, but Trudeau later told an audience that the president’s threats of annexation – often viewed as a negotiating tactic – were serious, and should be taken as such.

“I suggest that not only does the Trump administration know how many critical minerals we have but that may be even why they keep talking about absorbing us and making us the 51st state,” Trudeau reportedly told attendees.

“They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have and they very much want to be able to benefit from those,” he said. “But Mr Trump has it in mind that one of the easiest ways of doing that is absorbing our country.”

Canada is rich in minerals considered critical to the green energy transition, including lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt, and has sought to position itself as a trusted and stable supplier of the commodities to allied nations.


Trump’s threats, which have upended the longstanding relationship between the two countries, have dramatically reshaped federal politics and ushered in a new era of patriotism. With an election looming, all parties are scrambling to portray themselves as patriotic and ready to defend the country’s sovereignty.

In Quebec, where provincial sovereigntists have experienced a surge in popularity, the number of people calling for a referendum on the province’s secession has dropped. Between December and February, people in Quebec who said they were “very proud” or “proud” to be Canadian increased 13 points from 45% to 58%, according to an Angus Reid poll.

Related: In this Trump era of shakedown diplomacy, everything has a price

On Friday, federal cabinet ministers sought to reassure attenders.

“Our American friends understand that they need Canada for their economic security, they need Canada for their energy security and they need Canada for their national security,” the industry minister, François-Philippe Champagne, told AFP.

The trade minister, Anita Anand, said there would be “no messing” with the border.

“Canada is free. Canada is sovereign,” the employment minister, Steven MacKinnon, told reporters. “Canada will choose its own destiny, thank you very much.”









AccuWeather

Top Stories

  • Homemade Valentine's Day gifts
  • Healing from divorce
  • 60 recipes, from wings to chili
  • Winning appetizer recipes
  • What is USAID?
  • AI and job applications
  • New winter storm
  • Bird flu latest
  • Missing Alaska flight
The Daily Beast

Trudeau Caught on Hot Mic Revealing Trump’s Plans for Canada

Joey McFadden
Fri, February 7, 2025 at 1:52 PM MST·2 min read
2.9k
Donald Trump & Justin Trudeau
Nicholas Kamm / AFP via Getty Images

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told business leaders that U.S. President Donald Trump’s interest in annexing Canada was a very real plan aimed at controlling the country’s vast mineral resources.

Trudeau was caught on a hot mic giving his assessment of Trump’s threat to take control of America’s northern neighbor.

“I suggest that not only does the Trump administration know how many critical minerals we have but that may be even why they keep talking about absorbing us and making us the 51st state,” he said. “They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have, and they very much want to be able to benefit from those. But Mr. Trump has it in mind that one of the easiest ways of doing that is absorbing our country. And it is a real thing.”

These remarks were made after Trudeau ushered the media out of the room. He continued to talk about his “conversation” with Trump, then realized the mic was still on, and ordered a staffer to turn off the recording device.

Canadian Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne believes Trump’s tough talk about annexing Canada is a negotiation tactic. He says Canada is not changing its strategy around critical minerals.

“They need us more than ever. They understand, particularly the military guys, they are very worried about strategy in terms of being their partner, in terms of critical minerals, yeah,” he said. “I would say this is a great leverage for Canada, because the military folks understand that they cannot rebuild their industrial base, their defense, military industrial base, without Canada.”

Unifor President Lana Payne, a union leader concerned about annexation and tariffs, says she is “taking everything seriously right now because I have a lot of members whose jobs are at stake in this climate of chaos and instability.”

Up next

The Guardian

Trudeau says Trump is serious about wanting to annex Canada

Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Fri, February 7, 2025 at 2:11 PM MST·3 min read
108
<span>The Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, speaks to business and labour leaders amid the looming threat of US protectionism in Toronto on Friday.</span><span>Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters</span>
The Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, speaks to business and labour leaders amid the looming threat of US protectionism in Toronto on Friday.Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters

Donald Trump’s recent fixation on absorbing Canada is “a real thing”, Justin Trudeau has told business leaders, warning that the US president wants access to his northern neighbour’s vast supply of critical minerals.

The outgoing prime minister was in Toronto for a hastily called summit of business and labour leaders, seeking to coordinate a response Trump’s looming threat of a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports.

Earlier this week, Trump backed away from tariffs that would have devastated Canada’s economy, granting one of his country’s largest trading partners a 30-day reprieve for further negotiations.

Related: ‘Buy Canadian Instead’: businesses vow to fight Trump’s tariffs across the border

But he has continued to mock Canadian sovereignty, repeating his description of the country as the “51st state” on social media and repeatedly calling Trudeau “governor” instead of prime minister.

Friday’s summit included discussions on stemming the movement of fentanyl, security at the border and the challenge of interprovincial trade, but Trudeau later told an audience that the president’s threats of annexation – often viewed as a negotiating tactic – were serious, and should be taken as such.

“I suggest that not only does the Trump administration know how many critical minerals we have but that may be even why they keep talking about absorbing us and making us the 51st state,” Trudeau reportedly told attendees.

“They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have and they very much want to be able to benefit from those,” he said. “But Mr Trump has it in mind that one of the easiest ways of doing that is absorbing our country.”

Canada is rich in minerals considered critical to the green energy transition, including lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and cobalt, and has sought to position itself as a trusted and stable supplier of the commodities to allied nations.

Trump’s threats, which have upended the longstanding relationship between the two countries, have dramatically reshaped federal politics and ushered in a new era of patriotism. With an election looming, all parties are scrambling to portray themselves as patriotic and ready to defend the country’s sovereignty.

In Quebec, where provincial sovereigntists have experienced a surge in popularity, the number of people calling for a referendum on the province’s secession has dropped. Between December and February, people in Quebec who said they were “very proud” or “proud” to be Canadian increased 13 points from 45% to 58%, according to an Angus Reid poll.

Related: In this Trump era of shakedown diplomacy, everything has a price

On Friday, federal cabinet ministers sought to reassure attenders.

“Our American friends understand that they need Canada for their economic security, they need Canada for their energy security and they need Canada for their national security,” the industry minister, François-Philippe Champagne, told AFP.

The trade minister, Anita Anand, said there would be “no messing” with the border.

“Canada is free. Canada is sovereign,” the employment minister, Steven MacKinnon, told reporters. “Canada will choose its own destiny, thank you very much.”

Up next

NY Post

Hot mic catches Trudeau saying Trump is serious about annexing Canada

NY Post
Sat, February 8, 2025 at 5:26 AM MST
3
Hot mic catches Trudeau saying Trump is serious about annexing Canada
Scroll back up to restore default view.

In a closed-door session with business leaders, Justin Trudeau said he takes Donald Trump's calls to annex Canada seriously.

Up next

Fox News

Trudeau says Trump is serious about Canada becoming 51st state: reports

Michael Dorgan
Sat, February 8, 2025 at 6:50 AM MST·4 min read
108
Trudeau says Trump is serious about Canada becoming 51st state: reports

President Donald Trump has for weeks suggested that Canada become the United States’ 51st state, and while opinion has been divided about whether Trump is serious or merely trolling its neighbor, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has reportedly said that it’s the former, according to reports.

In a closed-door meeting with Canadian business and labor leaders, Trudeau reportedly affirmed that Trump’s ambitious aims of annexation are "a real thing."

"Mr. Trump has it in mind that the easiest way to do it is absorbing our country and it is a real thing. In my conversations with him on …" Trudeau said before the microphone cut out, according to CBC.

President-elect Trump and Canadian Prime Minster Justin Trudeau
President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minster Justin Trudeau.

Trump Imposes Tariffs On Imports From Canada, Mexico And China: 'National Emergency'

The news media had been asked to leave the room before Trudeau delivered his comments, but CBC and The Toronto Star were able to hear them and record them.

"I suggest that not only does the Trump administration know how many critical minerals we have, but that may be even why they keep talking about absorbing us and making us the 51st state," Trudeau added according to people in the room who listened to his comments. "They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have, and they very much want to be able to benefit from those."

Read On The Fox News App

Gil McGowan, president of the Alberta Federation of Labor, confirmed what Trudeau said in a post on social platform X.

"Yes, I can confirm that Trudeau said his assessment is that what Trump really wants is not action on fentanyl or immigration or even the trade deficit, what he really wants is to either dominate Canada or take it outright," McGowan wrote. "Tariffs are a tactic towards that end."

Trump first pitched the idea during a dinner at Mar-a-Lago with Trudeau in late November. Trump has also suggested annexing Greenland.

Canada is home to more than 40 million people and is a founding NATO partner. It is a natural resource-rich nation that provides the U.S. with commodities such as oil.

Trump has long said Canada – as well as Mexico – has failed to do enough to prevent the flow of illegal migrants and drugs, particularly fentanyl into the U.S. In addition, Trump claims the U.S. has subsidized Canada to the tune of $200 billion annually.

Canada Will Not Be '51St State,' Ambassador Protests Amid Trump Tariff Threat

Last weekend, Trump again repeated his suggestion of absorbing Canada, noting that it would not be subjected to his incoming tariffs should the country join the U.S.

"We pay hundreds of Billions of Dollars to SUBSIDIZE Canada. Why? There is no reason," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "We don’t need anything they have. We have unlimited Energy, should make our own Cars, and have more Lumber than we can ever use. Without this massive subsidy, Canada ceases to exist as a viable Country. Harsh but true!"

"Therefore, Canada should become our Cherished 51st State," Trump added. "Much lower taxes, and far better military protection for the people of Canada – AND NO TARIFFS!"

But Trump agreed to pause the tariffs for 30 days on Monday after a call with Trudeau, who made some concessions to temporarily stave off the levies.

Trudeau said Canada will implement a $1.3 billion border plan and appoint a fentanyl czar. In addition, Canada will reinforce its border with new helicopters, technology, personnel and enhanced coordination with American authorities. He added that nearly 10,000 personnel are and will be working on border protection.

"We will list cartels as terrorists, ensure 24/7 eyes on the border, launch a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl and money laundering," Trudeau wrote on X. "I have also signed a new intelligence directive on organized crime and fentanyl and we will be backing it with $200 million."

Trump with fist raised
President Donald Trump has been touting a plan to make Canada the 51st state since November.

The U.S. imports approximately 60% of its crude oil from Canada, with Alberta alone supplying 4.3 million barrels per day. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the U.S. consumes about 20 million barrels a day, while domestically producing about 13.2 million barrels a day. This means about a quarter of the oil the U.S. consumes every day is from Canada.

Canada is the top export destination for 36 U.S. states. Nearly $2.7 billion worth of goods and services cross the border each day.

Meanwhile, Canada is home to dozens of minerals considered critical for use in various industries, including for electric car batteries, solar panels, and semiconductors, according to the New York Times. Some commonly recognized examples of critical minerals include lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and zinc.

Fox News’ Danielle Wallace and Louis Casiano, as well as The Associated Press, contributed to this report. 


Original article source: Trudeau says Trump is serious about Canada becoming 51st state: reports

Up next

The Independent

Trudeau says Trump is serious about making Canada a US state

Shweta Sharma
Sat, February 8, 2025 at 2:29 AM MST·3 min read
Trudeau says Trump is serious about making Canada a US state

Donald Trump’s desire to annex Canada and make it the 51st US state is a “real thing” due to the country’s abundant natural resources, Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau reportedly said at an economic summit.

The outgoing prime minister addressed dozens of business leaders and policymakers at a summit in Toronto, where they discussed Mr Trump’s looming threat of a 25 per cent tariff on all Canadian imports. The comments were made during a closed-door meeting after the media had been asked to leave and were mistakenly picked up by a microphone, Canada’s public broadcaster CBC reported.

“They’re very aware of our resources, of what we have and they very much want to be able to benefit from those,” Mr Trudeau reportedly said.

“But Mr Trump has it in mind that one of the easiest ways of doing that is absorbing our country. And it is a real thing.”

In a post on social platform X, Gil McGowan, president of the Alberta Federation of Labour, confirmed Mr Trudeau’s remarks. “Yes, I can confirm that Trudeau said his assessment is that what Trump really wants is not action on fentanyl or immigration or even the trade deficit, what he really wants is to either dominate Canada or take it outright,” Mr McGowan wrote.

The Independent has reached out to Mr Trudeau’s office for comment.

Mr Trump has repeatedly threatened Canada with sweeping tariffs on exports and suggested that the country could avoid them by voting to replace Charles III as head of state with the American president and becoming the 51st US state.

Initially, it was downplayed as a joke but was seen more seriously after Mr Trump vowed to use “economic force” to force Ottawa to dismiss the border with the US as an “artificially drawn line”.

Mr Trump on Monday agreed to a 30-day pause on threats to impose 25 per cent tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada, with another 10 per cent tariff on Canadian oil, natural gas and electricity.

Mr Trump had threatened the tariffs to ensure greater cooperation from the countries to stop illegal immigration and prevent fentanyl smuggling, but he has also pledged to use tariffs to boost domestic manufacturing and raise revenues for the federal government.

Mr Trudeau said Canada can use the 30-day extension to show US officials the country’s increased spending on border security. Canada has announced a $1.3bn Canadian (£729m) border security plan that includes drones, helicopters, more border guards and the creation of a joint task force.

Mr Trudeau also has promised to appoint a new fentanyl czar, who will serve as the primary liaison between the Canadian and US governments, even though less than 1 per cent of the fentanyl and illegal immigrant crossings into the US come from Canada.

“If those tariffs do end up coming in or the investigation into commerce tariffs that is scheduled for April moves forward, we need to be ready to respond robustly,” Mr Trudeau said in public remarks at the summit.

He said Canada now faces “what may be a more challenging long-term political situation with the United States.”

He added that Canada needs to be prepared if Mr Trump decides to go ahead with the tariffs after 30 days.

“We need to be ready to respond robustly,” he said. “We also have to be ready to support Canadians through the responses we’re giving and through a difficult time of tariffs.”

Canada has vast resources of three dozen minerals which are considered critical for modern technology such as green energy transition, vehicle batteries and defence applications.

EUGENE PLAWIUK at 6:42 PM No comments:
Share
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
EUGENE PLAWIUK
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.