Monday, March 29, 2021

Reading Mrs Dalloway: How Virginia Woolf wrote illness and isolation into the national story of post war Britain

Mrs Dalloway is a text that shows how memory and mourning work to uphold the values of the British Empire. Its attention on how emotions circulate between people allows us to understand how national structures of feeling are created through newspapers and through the orchestration of symbolic identifications.


Virginia Woolf painted by Roger Eliot Fry. 
Image via The Conversation/ Leeds Museums and Galleries, CC BY-NC

By Jess Cotton
The Conversation March 29, 2021 


Illness, unlike war, as English academic and writer Elizabeth Outka brilliantly demonstrates in her book Viral Modernism (2019), is a story that easily slips out of cultural and historical memory.

In illness, the modernist writer Virginia Woolf observed, “We cease to be soldiers in the army of the upright; we become deserters.” Woolf, writing in the wake of the first world war, saw the threat that the Spanish flu of 1919 posed to the stories of national triumph. Influenza moves in invisible and unpredictable ways. It renders everyone potentially vulnerable.

This interest in illness was personal. Woolf came down with several bouts of influenza between 1916 and 1925 and needed to confine herself to bed for stretches of time.

She documents the experience of the Spanish flu in her diary in 1918, noting, as an aside, how “we are, by the way, in the midst of a plague unmatched since The Black Death, according to the Times, who seem to tremble lest it may seize upon Lord Northcliffe and thus precipitate us into peace.”

Her tone is mocking. She would later appreciate the seriousness the threat of influenza posed. But here she suggests that what illness promises to bring is the end of the profit of war that fuels the nationalist sentiments churned out by the newspapers owned by Lord Northcliffe’s vast empire of popular journalism.

Reading Woolf’s work, particularly her 1925 novel Mrs Dalloway, on the 80th anniversary of her death and in the midst of our own pandemic, we see how she tried to rewrite death and illness back into the national story of post-first world war glory and strength.

Sidelining death


I’m a lecturer in English at Cardiff University, and teaching literature in a sparsely filled lecture theatre during the pandemic has been a discombobulating experience. Mrs Dalloway provided an entry point to make sense of the business of studying and thinking while a new national emergency unfolded around us. The protagonist of Mrs Dalloway is a survivor of the Spanish flu of 1919 and the sense of life that permeates the text emerges from her experience of rediscovering the pleasures of life. We meet Mrs Dalloway as she weaves her way through London, experiencing the quiet intensity of life one morning in June.

The novel’s famous opening line –'Mrs Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself' – has taken on new resonance this year as the pandemic has made all our worlds much smaller. Clarissa wants to buy the flowers herself because she is delighted to go out – as we might appreciate – having spent so long indoors.

In class, the students and I thought about what it meant to see Clarissa as a character who has lived through a pandemic and who has come out the other side. Clarissa’s commitment to life, after a long confinement, is hopeful, though my students weren’t all convinced that it felt like one.

At the centre of Clarissa’s party, which the novel builds to, comes the news that Septimus Smith, a young war veteran, has killed himself. In Woolf’s original plans for her novel, Septimus did not appear and Clarissa was to kill herself during the party. In creating Septimus as Clarissa’s double, Woolf is able to move death to the sidelines – as we all would like to.

The Spanish influenza of 1918 was a plague that posed a serious threat and moved in the most unpredictable ways. Image via The Conversation/ Science History Images Alamy

Woolf revolutionises character by radically tunnelling inwards – giving us not a description of a character, but a map of their psychic life. We experience the protagonist intimately from within – through their stream of consciousness – but peripheral characters also proliferate in the modernist novel.

Woolf recognises how easily it is to cast characters to the sidelines of life. This is, after all, how national fictions work, by making space for protagonists at the expense of those who are pushed further out of view. In the case of post-war Britain, space was made for the glory of war but not for the the Spanish flu.

Collective memory


Mrs Dalloway is a text that shows how memory and mourning work to uphold the values of the British Empire. Its attention on how emotions circulate between people allows us to understand how national structures of feeling are created through newspapers and through the orchestration of symbolic identifications.

“In all the hat shops and tailors’ shops strangers looked at each other,” Woolf writes, “and thought of the dead; of the flag of Empire.” Woolf is interested in showing something that is hard to pinpoint: how national communities are created and sustained; how the war’s dead continue to underpin an inexorable sense of Britishness.

Woolf saw that a subjective perspective was required to make sense of how death continues to inflect the mood of a generation. Mourning, as Sigmund Freud also realised at a similar point, is ongoing, illusory work. What is remarkable about her writing is that Woolf draws our attention to how death pushes us beyond what we can know. In this unknowing, we are forced to admit that our lives are more fragile and dependent on the lives of others.

As one of her characters articulates in The Voyage Out (1915):

“It seems so inexplicable,” Evelyn continued. “Death, I mean. Why should she be dead, and not you or I? It was only a fortnight ago that she was here with the rest of us?”

Woolf’s ability to show how hard it is to explain death helps us understand the difficulty of living with its presence. In the face of the loneliness of death, the growing demise of its communal forms, the diminished structures of public mourning, she provides us with a language for death outside of national structures of commemoration.

Jess Cotton is Lecturer at the School of English, Communication and Philosophy, Cardiff University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Updated Date: March 29, 2021 

How music and contemporary composers influenced Virginia Woolf's literature, creative innovations

Music provided Woolf (and other modernists including James Joyce, Ezra Pound, Gertrude Stein and Katherine Mansfield) with a vocabulary to imagine and describe their creative practice and formal innovations.


Virginia Woolf listened to a widesian ballet music which she heard when the Ballets Russes visited London in 1912. Image via variety of music, including Rus The Conversation/ Wikimedia Commons


By Emma Sutton
The Conversation March 28, 2021


Many of Virginia Woolf’s early reviewers noted parallels between her literary innovations and those of contemporary composers, such as Claude Debussy. Woolf’s interest in music was overlooked after her death. However, 80 years on, we are now beginning to explore how her extraordinary experimental uses of narrative perspective, repetition and variation derive from her close study of particular musical works and specific musical forms.

Music provided Woolf (and other modernists including James Joyce, Ezra Pound, Gertrude Stein and Katherine Mansfield) with a vocabulary to imagine and describe their creative practice and formal innovations. Woolf, for instance, compares her diary writing to a pianist practising their scales. She describes her reading as a process of “tuning up” for her writing. And in 1940 she famously observed:

It’s odd, for I’m not regularly musical but I always think of my books as music before I write them.

Music in Woolf’s life


Woolf grew up immersed in music. As a young woman, she attended operas and concerts at the Royal Opera House three or four times a week – sometimes, every night. Like most women of her age and social class, she had received basic music education in singing and piano. But her passion as a listener far outstripped her abilities as a performer.

Her letters and diaries repeatedly convey her love of classical repertoire – particularly the works of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and Wagner. But she heard a wide variety of music in varied settings. She heard folk music as she travelled in England, Scotland and continental Europe. Took in comic and patriotic songs in music halls. Delighted in the work of Arnold Schoenberg and another avant-garde repertoire through her subscription membership of the National Gramophonic Society, and Russian ballet music when the Ballets Russes visited London in 1912.

Woolf’s Hogarth Press also published studies of contemporary music, composers and popular books of music appreciation. Her understanding of – and in some cases intimate friendships with – leading composers, music critics, conductors and other musicians of her time gave her an insight into professional musical life, too. Friends included the composers and critics Eddy Sackville-West and Gerald Berners, the conductor and educator Nadia Boulanger, and the composer and feminist Ethel Smyth.

Music in Woolf’s writing


Woolf’s feminism, pacificism and cosmopolitanism were significantly shaped by her enduring, passionate love of music. The social conventions surrounding music education, performance and composition catalyse some of her wittiest and most acerbic social comedy but also inform her critiques of, for example, women’s unequal access to music education.

In her first novel, The Voyage Out (1915), Woolf references specific musical works to challenge the established expectation that men and women should play different repertoire. The novel’s female protagonist, who is an accomplished amateur pianist, plays Beethoven’s late piano sonatas. These works were frequently characterised as too technically and intellectually demanding for women performers. Essays addressed to amateur female pianists characterised the works as “simply unattainable.”

Music also influences Woolf’s creative innovations. The double narrative structure of Mrs Dalloway, for example, which contrasts and entwines the lives of society hostess Clarissa Dalloway and traumatised veteran Septimus Warren Smith, may well be modelled on the double form of musical fugues ('fugue' was a contemporary term for shell shock).

Woolf observed in 1909 that, “We are miserably aware how little words can do to render music.” But this difficulty frequently catalyses and becomes a subject of her writing.

It’s perhaps unsurprising, then, that her prose has been a rich source of creative inspiration for composers. For instance, her work inspired Dominick Argento’s 1974 song cycle From the Diary of Virginia Woolf and more oblique responses, such as Max Richter’s music for the 2015 ballet Woolf Works.

In the last 15 years, musical responses to Woolf’s writing have proliferated, from the string quartet and songs premiered by the Virginia Woolf and Music project, to the recent announcement that composer Thea Musgrave is writing an opera inspired by Orlando.

In a 1905 essay, Woolf invited contemporary writers to remember words’ allegiance to music and take inspiration from that. Scholars of Woolf’s work and composers are now, it seems, doing just that.

Emma Sutton, Professor of English, University of St Andrews

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The big picture: Lee Miller's sphinx-like blitz spirit
Lee Miller, Self Portrait with Sphinxes, Vogue Studio, London, England, 1940. Photograph: © Lee Miller Archives

Vogue’s war correspondent poses in a statuesque self-portrait as 1940s London finds itself under threat



Tim Adams
@TimAdamsWrites
Sun 28 Mar 2021

In 1939, the American photographer Lee Miller came to live in London, with the artist Roland Penrose, her lover. She wrote to a friend back home to describe how, with the outbreak of war, she had found a new job. “I’d barely settled in to Hampstead when Condé Nast (British Vogue magazine) collared me and I found myself running their studio,” she wrote. “They had little choice, poor things, all their photographers had been called up, the Americans just wanted to go home… I made out all right.”

The letter embellished the truth: in fact, Miller had pitched up at Vogue’s offices to volunteer her services, and, though initially rebuffed, had refused to go away. It was to prove an inspired relationship. To begin with, the magazine saw its wartime role as business as usual: “Our policy is to maintain the standards of civilisation. We believe that woman’s place is Vogue’s place. And woman’s first duty is to preserve the arts of peace by practising them, so that in happier times they will not have fallen into disuse…” With Miller’s input, however, the news seeped into the pages of the magazine: alongside her fashion spreads, she started to make photographic series of women who were contributing to the war effort; by 1944 she persuaded Vogue to make her its first war correspondent and she famously photographed the liberation of France and the opening of Dachau for the magazine.

This picture, a self-portrait (part of a new book and exhibition of Miller’s Vogue photography), was taken in 1940 in the magazine’s studios, at the beginning of the blitz. Miller’s profile, between the carved sphinxes, captured a spirit of coutured defiance. In the months that followed, after Vogue’s offices were bombed, her pictures more often juxtaposed that model composure with ruined buildings and broken statues, but it was never dimmed. “During three months of solid hell at night,” Miller wrote to her parents the following year, “it became a matter of pride that the work went on.”

Lee Miller: Fashion in Wartime Britain is published by the Lee Miller Archives (£35). 

An exhibition of the same name is at Farleys House & Gallery in East Sussex, 20 May-8 August
The Observer Vaccines and immunisation


How Mary Wortley Montagu's bold experiment led to smallpox vaccine -
 75 years before Jenner

A new book celebrates the trailblazing work of the English aristocrat, who successfully inoculated her daughter


Edward Jenner administering a smallpox vaccine. He himself had been inoculated as a child by doctors following Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s ideas. Photograph: Getty


Donna Ferguson
Sun 28 Mar 2021 

It was a daring and dangerous experiment that paved the way for the development of the first safe vaccine and saved countless lives. Yet when Lady Mary Wortley Montagu deliberately infected her own daughter with a tiny dose of smallpox – successfully inoculating the three-year-old child in 1721 – her ideas were dismissed and she was denounced by 18th-century society as an “ignorant woman” .

Three hundred years later, on the anniversary of that first groundbreaking inoculation on English soil, a new biography will aim to raise the profile of Wortley Montagu and reassert her rightful place in history as a trailblazing 18th-century scientist and early feminist.

“If she had not inoculated her daughter, we would not then have gone on ultimately to find a cure for smallpox,” said Jo Willett, author of The Pioneering Life of Mary Wortley Montagu, which will be published on Tuesday. “She should be heralded for that – yet she’s not really well known, and I think partly that’s because she was a woman.”

Wortley Montagu, a smallpox survivor with a disfigured face, took the risky decision to inoculate her daughter by making tiny cuts on her daughter’s skin and rubbing in a small amount of pus from a live smallpox sore.
If Wortley Montagu hadn’t inoculated her daughter, we may never have gone on to find a cure for smallpox.Jo Willett, author

This gave the child, known as “young Mary”, a very mild dose of the disease, Willett said. “Normally, with smallpox, you might have several thousand spots on your body. An inoculated child would probably have about 30 spots and then a few days later they’d be absolutely fine again, running around and having fun.”

Wortley Montagu had learned about the practice of inoculation in Turkey, where her husband had worked as the British ambassador. “When she got there, she went to Turkish baths and saw women without any smallpox marks on their skin. That was a wake-up call.”
Advertisement

In 18th-century Turkey, inoculation was a common “folk practice”, typically carried out by “illiterate old Greek and Armenian women”, Willett said. “She asked them about it and analysed it, and decided it was worth the risk.”

She managed to successfully inoculate her son while she was there, but her daughter was too young. The family then returned to England, where Wortley Montagu’s enthusiasm for inoculation was met with suspicion and strong resistance from the medical establishment. “When Lady Mary first came back, she didn’t dare do anything [to her daughter]. But there was such a severe outbreak in 1721, she thought she had to take action.”

She then invited highly respected physicians and “ladies of distinction” round to witness young Mary’s speedy recovery from the infection. One of the physicians who visited was so convinced, he decided to inoculate his own son, which also went well. Young Mary soon became famous. “News reached Princess Caroline, who was the Princess of Wales at the time. She took up the cause and eventually the royal children were inoculated. Word spread that it was a good thing to do.”


However, not everyone was convinced. “The Whigs were pro-inoculation but the Tory party was really against it – a lot of Tories wrote about how it was interfering with nature and it was dangerous. It became very politicised.”

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, painted by Joseph Highmore,
 got the idea for inoculation after seeing the practice in Turkey. Photograph: Getty

Sometimes people died from smallpox after the procedure, which had to be carried out very carefully to ensure only a small dose was administered. “Often the gashes were too big.” In Turkey, people knew they needed to self-isolate for a period after an inoculation, but in England the process was ‘medicalised’ by ill-informed physicians. They pointlessly purged and bled their patients during the inoculation, and then allowed people to walk around while they were infectious, unwittingly spreading the disease. “There was a lot of misinformation.”

As controversy mounted, Wortley Montagu’s reputation suffered and her argument – that the inoculation process should not be medicalised – was dismissed. One prominent physician, William Wagstaffe, bemoaned the fact that a practice performed by a “few ignorant women” was being adopted in the royal palace, while Alexander Pope wrote venomous poems about Wortley Montagu, describing her as “poxed”. “He knew people would know she was connected to smallpox, but by using the word ‘pox’, he was implying that she had syphilis. So that didn’t help her reputation.”
Advertisement

Young Mary wrote that she remembers servants giving her “dark looks” and acting as if they were repulsed by her when she visited aristocratic families with her mother to inoculate the household.

When Edward Jenner invented the smallpox vaccine in 1796, by taking fluid from a cowpox vaccine and scratching it on to the skin of a young boy, he was building on Wortley Montagu’s discovery, Willett said. “She brought a cure to the west. And that cure was developed into what we now think of as vaccination.”


Rare letter by Mary Wortley Montagu, pioneering travel writer, up for sale
Read more


As a child, Jenner had himself been inoculated against smallpox by doctors following in Wortley Montagu’s footsteps. “He went through the whole purging and bleeding process and had such a grim experience that I think he thought: ‘there has to be an easier way of doing this’.”

When he realised that dairymaids never got smallpox, he “made the leap” and thought of introducing cowpox pus into a scratch instead of smallpox pus. “If he hadn’t been inoculated, then I don’t think he would have gone on to think about vaccination,” says Willett.

Jenner had discovered a much safer way to confer immunity – and, unlike Wortley Montagu, as an educated male physician, he could publish scientific papers about his discovery and be taken seriously. He was later credited by Louis Pasteur as the discoverer of the first vaccine. “Often in the canon of the history of science, women get overlooked,” said Willett. “Lady Mary is one of those women.”

Ammonite review – a chilly love among the fossils

‘Superbly flinty’: Kate Winslet as Mary Anning, with Saoirse Ronan in Ammonite. 
Photograph: See-saw Films\bbc Films/Allstar

Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan’s 19th-century romance showcases their talents but doesn’t warm the heart


 Observer film critic
Sun 28 Mar 2021

This handsome second feature from the writer-director of 2017’s brilliant God’s Own Country is another hesitant love story set against the backdrop of a bracing British locale: the sea-battered Dorset coast around the famous Cobb of Lyme Regis harbour. It has been the setting for some overcooked screen moments in the past, although the emotional weather forecast here is frosty with occasional storms.

Kate Winslet is superbly flinty as Mary Anning, the 19th-century palaeontologist whose under-attributed finds have graced the display cases of the British Museum since her childhood. An early image sees a handwritten label for the historic “Sea Lizard, found by Miss Mary Anning” being tuttingly replaced by a floridly embellished sign reading “Ichthyosaurus, Lyme Regis, Presented by H Hoste Henley Esq”. It’s a concise way of illustrating both Anning’s outsider status (her role in the discovery is effectively usurped) and the snobbery of an establishment averse to inclusivity.

Anning runs a shop selling “Fossils and Curios”, which she gathers from the rugged coastline, striding purposefully over rocks and foam. Like Daniel Plainview in the opening movement of There Will Be Blood, Winslet’s heroine is a figure of few words and imposing stature, driven by an internal engine that seems to require no human contact. Her mother, Molly (the redoubtable Gemma Jones), is equally insular; theirs is not a household filled with warmth and laughter. Watching this, I longed for a shawl to wrap snuggly around my shoulders.

Things change when Mary meets Charlotte Murchison (Saoirse Ronan, excellent), a young woman in the throes of a debilitating depression whose husband wants her to stay with Anning, albeit temporarily. Perhaps the invigorating air and the chance to observe Anning at work will restore the once-vibrant spirit that has withered in his company. Mary is not keen, but payment is promised and arrangements made. Soon, Charlotte’s fine clothes are becoming muddied and torn on the rocks. Gradually, the pair’s growing friendship gives way to passion – strangely desperate couplings amid the stark silences of the house.

The real-life Murchison was an accomplished geologist and illustrator who became close to Anning, although Lee’s decision to portray them as lovers has inevitably ruffled some feathers. In response, Lee has stated: “After seeing queer history be routinely ‘straightened’ throughout culture, and given a historical figure where there is no evidence whatsoever of a heterosexual relationship, is it not permissible to view that person within another context?”

It’s a powerful point, eloquently made, although, in the end, issues of class and gender, rather than sexual orientation, seem more central to Lee’s film. It’s no accident that Ammonite opens with a woman industriously polishing a floor, only to recoil in head-bowed subservience as “gentlemen” march by. While Ralph Fiennes’s archaeologist Basil Brown was snubbed in The Dig for being largely self-taughtWinslet’s Anning faces the double whammy of being both an autodidact and a woman. Wisely, Lee lets these events speak for themselves, rather than hammering home any sociopolitical message through needless expository dialogue.

Stéphane Fontaine’s crisp cinematography perfectly captures the bleak chilliness of the environment, while Dustin O’Halloran and Volker Bertelmann’s sparingly used score is as notable for the gaping voids in which it doesn’t appear as for those carefully chosen moments when it does. It adds up to an expertly crafted film that nonetheless feels somewhat distanced and removed, like an exhibit under glass. At times, I was reminded of the austere atmosphere of Michael Winterbottom’s Jude, another critical triumph for Winslet. Both films have much to admire artistically; both left me just a little cold

 Ammonite is available on various streaming platforms

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Mormon leaders accused of fraud, misusing tithes in lawsuit filed by brother of former Utah governor

A prominent former church member filed suit after reading an IRS whistleblower report claiming the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints had $100 billion in assets that were not being used for charity.

A man walks past the Salt Lake Temple at Temple Square in Salt Lake City on Sept. 14, 2016. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

(RNS) —  A former member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has accused the church of misusing millions of dollars in donations.

James Huntsman, a filmmaker who is the son of a prominent philanthropist and the brother of a former governor of Utah, claimed in federal court that the corporate arm of the church — known as the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — used donations, known as tithings, to develop a mall in downtown Salt Lake City and to bail out a troubled insurance company.

According to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, church leaders “defrauded Mr. Huntsman out of millions of dollars by falsely misleading him into believing his tithings would be used solely for charitable pursuits around the world” but instead using those donations for commercial purpose.

Latter-day Saints, like other Christian groups, believe in the idea of tithing, or donating a set percentage of income, usually 10%, to the church. According to the LDS church’s website, tithing is a “natural and integrated aspect” of the beliefs and practices of Mormons.


RELATED: Why I stopped tithing to the LDS Church


“All funds given to the Church by its members are considered sacred,” the church’s website states. “They are voluntary offerings that represent the faith and dedication of members and are used with careful oversight and discretion.”

The complaint cites a number of statements from church leaders, saying no tithings were used for the City Creek Mall in Salt Lake City.

A spokesman for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints told The Washington Post that accusations in the lawsuit were “baseless” and that tithes were voluntary religious contributions.

“They are used for a broad array of religious purposes, including missionary work, education, humanitarian causes and the construction of meetinghouses, temples and other buildings important in the work of the Church, as reflected in scripture and determined by Church leaders,” according to a statement from the church spokesman.


RELATED: God cares a lot about money. Maybe you should too.


The lawsuit is part of the fallout from a whistleblower complaint filed with the IRS in 2019 by a former employee of Ensign Peak Advisors, which manages more than $100 billion in the church’s assets. Those assets came from both church tithings and investments, according to  Religion Unplugged, which first reported on the whistleblower complaint, and were used for the mall project and the insurance company bailout.

James Huntsman. Image courtesy of IMDB

James Huntsman. Image courtesy of IMDB

After reading about the whistleblower, Huntsman, who is no longer a member of the church, approached LDS leaders about returning millions of dollars in donations. That request was refused, according to the complaint.  

Huntsman is seeking more than $5 million in damages. In the suit, he stated he intends to donate any recovered funds “to benefit organizations and communities whose members have been marginalized by the Church’s teachings and doctrines, including by donating to charities supporting LGBTQ, African-American, and women’s rights.”

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Brazil’s business elite demand stronger Covid action – leading macroeconomic influencers

Economists believe that the Brazilian government should take stronger Covid-19 action.

Credit: 3dartistav, Shutterstock.com.

Economists and business leaders believe that the Brazilian government should take stronger Covid-19 action on policies and restrictions to curb the rising number of infections in the country.

Adam Tooze

26 March 2021 

Adam Tooze, a historian and director of the European Institute, shared an article on the rising conflict between hundreds of Brazilian private sector leaders and president Jair Bolsonaro’s mishandling of the Covid-19 crisis.


Prominent leaders including the central bank chief, economists, and bankers, signed an open letter to the Brazilian government demanding stronger Covid-19 action such as implementing a mask mandate and speeding up vaccinations, as the country’s death tolls mounts. According to official data, approximately 300,000 Brazilians have died from Covid-19, the second highest toll after the US.

Brazil is currently witnessing a brutal second wave of Covid-19 infections, with overwhelmed hospitals and some even facing shortages of critical equipment and oxygen. The country’s data reported 3,251 deaths in a single day this week, the highest daily toll since the Covid-19 outbreak in March 2020.

The business leaders’ letter was published after Verde Asset Management criticised the government in a letter to investors for failing to acquire coronavirus vaccines on time. Experts from the financial sector believe that the government should follow science and implement the necessary steps to tackle the pandemic. For example, the federal government should implement effective lockdowns, increase the supply of vaccines, and distribute masks for free.

Data further revealed that less than 8% of the Brazilian population has received the first dose of the vaccine, despite rapid immunisation programmes. Critics have stated that slow implementation and disorganisation within the country’s health ministry has led to the mishandling of the crisis.

Guntram Wolff

German economist and think tank leader, Guntram Wolff, shared an article that compared the unemployment increase in the US as against the increase in the euro area.


He stated that the increase in the euro zone was not as much as in the US. Although the Covid-19 pandemic has profoundly affected both the nations, experts believe that the number of Covid-19 cases has been higher in the US than in the euro area, particularly between mid-November 2020 and February 2021.

According to Goldman Sachs’ Effective Lockdown Index (ELI), the higher incidence of Covid infections in the US is indicative of the effectiveness of the lockdown policies.

Not only did the country have fewer restrictions than the euro area, but the latter also implemented more small-sized targeted policies to fight the Covid crisis.

The euro zone also covered the substantial increase in employed workers by job retention schemes that left the unemployment rate unchanged, while temporary layoffs in the US caused the unemployment rate to rise.

The employment in the euro area by the end of the fourth quarter 2020 was 1.9% below its fourth quarter 2019 levels, while in the US it had declined by 5.5% for the same period.

Claudia Sahm

US economist Claudia Sahm, shared a discussion on the US federal government’s efforts amid the coronavirus pandemic being pointed at the right direction.

According to Sahm, the Fed is bringing its maximum employment mandate that it got from Congress on par with its stable price mandate after over 40 years. Therefore, she does not believe that one is being prioritised over the other, and that the government is trying to get both of them right.

Experts also state that both Fed chief Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen seemed positive about the economic recovery during their second day of hearings. In fact, Yellen believes that the US economy could return to full employment as soon as next year.

However, Chairman Powell stated that the Fed will continue to support the economy as long as it is required.

Meanwhile, Sahm believes that the US is still short of 9.5 million jobs that have been a direct repercussion of the Covid-induced recession. As a result, people would have to be incentivised towards employment.





Long Covid: could chronic fatigue syndrome be taken seriously at last?
26 March 2021

‘Long Covid’ has become shorthand for a wide range of post-viral symptoms experienced by some patients following a Covid-19 infection. Cases of chronic fatigue after acute respiratory illness are far from unprecedented, but the scale at which they are now occurring is unprecedented. Advocates for patients with similar illnesses are now hoping that the attention being given to long Covid could help improve care for these illnesses as well. Chloe Kent reports.

Around one in ten recovered patients are experiencing ‘long Covid’ symptoms at least three months after being infected with COvid-19. Credit: Shutterstock.

Post-viral fatigue is a fairly common occurrence following any type of viral infection. After a bout of flu or battling off an Epstein-Barr virus, many people find themselves experiencing persistent fatigue for a few weeks, or even months, after supposed recovery. Unpleasant as this prolonged experience is, most people can expect to make an eventual return to full health.

But for some patients the fog never lifts. Viral illnesses are thought to be one of the primary causes of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), aka chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). This long-term condition is characterised primarily by extreme tiredness, along with brain fog, sore joints and flu-like symptoms.

Following the worldwide spread of Covid-19, around one in ten recovered patients are experiencing post-viral symptoms like these at least three months later, according to the UK Office for National Statistics. Many media reports and online support groups feature personal accounts of illness which carries on for much longer.


Christened ‘long Covid’, the condition appears to mirror post-viral ME in a number of ways and is distinct from the Covid-19 patients needing rehabilitative treatment for respiratory and cardiac damage caused by the virus.

“Any viral infection can cause a short-lived period of fatigue,” says ME Association medical adviser Dr Charles Shepherd. “That’s extremely common. What’s less common, but still reasonably so, is people who get a viral infection followed by post-viral fatigue syndrome, where you’ve got other symptoms like brain fog, feeling fluey, glands up, that sort of thing. That follows a lot of viral infections and goes on for a few weeks, and then people get over it and get better again.

“Then there’s the third group, where post-viral fatigue doesn’t resolve for three months or more and has a significant effect on what you can do – you can’t get back to work or normal life. At that point, most people would get a diagnosis of ME. That’s paralleling what’s happening for quite a few people with long Covid. There clearly is a lot of overlap between the two.”

ME has been historically neglected by clinicians and researchers


The sheer number of people now presenting with long Covid has forced clinicians and researchers to sit up and take notice of post-viral illness on a mass scale for the first time – something many ME patients have found frustrating after years of having their symptoms dismissed by doctors.

Shepherd says: “There’s still an awful lot of doctors out there who either don’t believe in ME or believe it’s all in the mind and are pretty dismissive and in some cases quite nasty to patients.”

Mindset coach Rachel was diagnosed with ME in 2008, but her doctors believe she has had the condition since 1998 when she was nine years old. She also has Ehlers Danlos syndrome and fibromyalgia.

Rachel says: “For years, I’d been told there was nothing wrong with me and it was all in my head. You do feel mental because there is no evidence to diagnose the condition, you can’t have a blood test, it’s a process of elimination.

“My GP turned around after diagnosis and said you can only have CFS for three years and then it becomes psychosomatic, and I went ‘oh great, that means I’m already psychosomatic then.’”

From 2006-2015 global research spending on ME averaged just $6.5m a year. This received a boost in 2017 when the US National Institutes of Health committed to doubling its spending in this area, allowing the figure to jump to $15m in 2017. When the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimate that as many as 17 to 24 million people worldwide have ME the money being spent on the condition starts to look like small change.

Funding for long Covid research is surging

The $15m figure starts to look even slimmer when compared to the research funding now available for long Covid. In the UK alone, the National Institute for Health Research and UK Research and Innovation have funded four studies to address the long term physical and mental effects of Covid-19, for a total of £18.5m.

It’s not yet possible to say whether long Covid is clinically distinct from ME or simply the same condition arising en-masse from one clearly identifiable cause, warranting its own signifier. What is clear is that the significant overlap of symptoms mean a lot of long Covid research will have implications for the wider treatment of post-viral fatigue.

Marketing assistant Becky was diagnosed with ME 16 years ago, and also has EDS, postural tachycardia syndrome, asthma and interstitial cystitis.

“For me personally there’s a deep sadness, a sort of grief, about what could happen in terms of research or treatment options,” she says. “I’m happy that maybe this is the turning point for the condition, options will be available and hopefully one day soon people won’t have to be forgotten, but at the same time, I find it strangely upsetting that I never had that opportunity.

“I think a lot of people in the chronic illness community feel this way; it’s almost guilt for feeling that way as well, but it’s hard not to feel some level of resentment.”
An overactive immune system could be the cause of post-viral illness

There’s currently no universally accepted explanation for why viral illnesses, Covid-19 included, can trigger these long-term symptoms.

Shepherd says: “Because ME is a multi-system disease and there are these various different pathological tracks going on within it, there are different therapeutic interventions going on in relation to the different components of it.”

Some clinicians think CFS could be the result of an overactive immune system failing to switch itself off again once it has fought off an infection, leading to increased levels of chemicals called cytokines. There continue to produce symptoms of illness even though no pathogen is present.

“There’s quite a lot of emerging evidence of a range of dysfunction across the whole immune system orchestra, but in particular the role of cytokines. This may link in with some of the neuroimaging findings on what we call neuroinflammation,” says Shepherd. “This has led to various small studies as to whether drugs which can dampen down this type of immune system activation could be of help in people with ME and long Covid.”

Dr Raymond Perrin takes an osteopathic approach to CFS, attributing the symptoms of CFS to a build-up of lymph in the recently-described glymphatic system, a pseudolymphatic system in the brain and that plays an important role in the removal of interstitial metabolic waste products.

“It’s literally manually pushing the lymph out using certain techniques,” he says. “It’s cytokines, large protein molecules, that need to drain away. If they’re not draining properly the whole control mechanism drains backwards instead of forwards and you end up with a build-up of inflammatory toxins in the brain.”

Perrin, who has detailed these methods in his book The Perrin Technique, has been treating patients with ME and fibromyalgia in this way for 30 years and has been treating long Covid patients in the same way since last year.
Histamine and mitochondrial dysfunction could also be to blame

Long Covid and ME could also be down to something known as mass cell activation syndrome, where infections can destabilise the mass cells where histamine is produced. This could explain the allergy-type symptoms like rashes and hives experienced by some long Covid patients.

There is also evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction in people with CFS.

“Mitochondria are sort of the Duracell batteries within muscle cells that are where energy is produced,” says Shepherd.

“We’ve now got quite a lot of evidence showing that there’s a defect in metabolic energy production at a cellular level in people with ME, so there is a biochemical explanation for the fatigue that is going on.

“Whether there’s mitochondrial dysfunction going on in long Covid I don’t know, because no one’s really had the time of the opportunity to study it, but it’s certainly another possibility for therapeutic intervention.”
Could the attention given to long Covid improve things for ME too?

Fortunately, research into the causes and corresponding treatments for long Covid is moving very fast, as is recognition and acceptance of the condition.

Shepherd says: “Although there’s all this great overlap between ME/CFS and long Covid there’s been a great reluctance in the long Covid patient community especially, especially among doctors involved in its treatment, to actually accept this overlap. They don’t want long Covid people to just get landed with all the problems people with ME have had with recognition.

“There’s this sort of tension between the two communities, a lot of quite understandable anger if you look on social media. People are constantly saying ‘look, we’ve been living with an illness like long Covid for 30 years and no one’s taken us seriously’, and now there’s all this money ploughed into research and all these clinics set up overnight.”

Nonetheless, a step in the right direction is a step in the right direction, even when some patients may feel it’s too little too late.

Shepherd says: “As time goes on there’s going to be much more acceptance about this overlap between the two conditions. It may well be that some of these long Covid clinics, once they’ve got a component that deals with Covid-type symptoms, are more help by becoming an ME/CFS service than they are a service primarily dealing with people who have long term respiratory and cardiac problems.”
'Be aware': The Pentagon's target list for extremist infiltrators — right and left

An internal "training module" singles out a range of groups, ideologies and symbols seen as primary insider threats.



Members of the National Guard patrol the area outside of the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 11, 2021. | Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo


By BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN and BRYAN BENDER
POLITICO
03/27/2021 

Extremism and Insider Threat in the DoD


Contributed by Evan Semones (POLITICO.com)



Flags from the left-wing Antifa movement. Depictions of Pepe the Frog, the cartoon character that's been misappropriated by racist groups. Iconography from the far-right Proud Boys, including the phrase "stand back and stand by" from former President Donald Trump.


They are all signs that extremists could be infiltrating the military, according to internal training materials that offer a more detailed view into the array of radical groups and ideologies the Pentagon is trying to keep out of the ranks.

“There are members of the [Department of Defense] who belong to extremist groups or actively participate in efforts to further extremist ideologies,” states a 17-page briefing obtained by POLITICO that was compiled by the DoD Insider Threat Management and Analysis Center, which is part of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency.

"Be aware of symbols of far right, far left, Islamist or single issue ideologies," it warns, stressing that members of the military and civilian personnel have “a duty and responsibility” to report extremist behavior or activity.

The materials were prepared as part of a broader Pentagon effort to crack down on extremists who may be lurking inside the military after dozens of ex-service members were arrested for their roles in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol to stop the certification of the presidential election.

The prevalence of extremists in the Defense Department appears to be small. For example, the 222,000-strong Marine Corps recently reported that it kicked out four members last year for extremist activity.

But the Pentagon says one is too many and the true numbers are not known because adherents who have been recruited by extremist groups or encouraged to enlist often organize and communicate in secret.

“No one truly knows,” Audrey Kurth Cronin, the director of American University’s Center for Security, Innovation and New Technology, told a House panel this week. “No serious plan can be built without defining the scope of the problem.”

The internal training materials focus on extremist behavior and symbolism — of all different stripes — and point out the risk of making false assumptions about people who do not pose any threat. This includes pointing out that religious conservatives are often mistakenly lumped together with white supremacists or other extremists.

The Department of Homeland Security has said white supremacist extremists are the most lethal terror threat facing the U.S. And while Republicans accused far-left groups such as Antifa of taking part in the insurrection, FBI Director Christopher Wray told lawmakers this month there's "no evidence" those groups played a role.

Last month, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered a force-wide stand down requiring all units to discuss the threat of extremism within 60 days.

He called it the first step in "a concerted effort to better educate ourselves and our people about the scope of this problem and to develop sustainable ways to eliminate the corrosive effects that extremist ideology and conduct have on the workforce."

The stand downs also include "listening sessions" to hear from Pentagon personnel about their experiences with activity, such as one held on Friday by a unit of the Army's 101st Airborne Division.



The Pentagon is cracking down on extremists who may be lurking inside the military after dozens of ex-service members were arrested for their roles in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. | John Minchillo/AP Photo

The department published broad guidance for commanders to address address extremism, which focuses on reinforcing the military's core principles enshrined in the oath they take to the Constitution and several case studies of military members who were prosecuted for engaging in extremist activity or plotting with radical groups.

But those materials did not identify specific threat groups, and Austin has provided wide leeway for individual units and commands to address the challenge as they see fit.

The internal briefing shared with POLITICO was compiled by the human resources office at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, a small Pentagon agency of several hundred military personnel, civilian employees and contractors that manages research into breakthrough technologies.

Pentagon spokesman Jamal Brown noted that military units and individual components have been given broad authority to tailor their own approaches to addressing the extremist threat with their employees. He could not immediately say how many personnel have received this specific information and deferred questions about it to DARPA.

Jared Adams, a spokesperson for DARPA, explained in an email that "our training module was copied verbatim from the material provided by the DOD Insider Threat Management & Analysis Center of the Defense Counter Intelligence and Security Agency.

"We did not add any symbols and used all the imagery provided," Adams said.

The briefing was sent to civilian employees as part of required training across the department for "Extremism and Insider Threat in the DoD." Adams said it is required training to be completed by this month. Employees have to digest the material and then answer some questions.

The more detailed materials break down extremist movements into three main categories, including “Patriot” extremism, anarchist extremism, and ethnic/racial supremacy.


DEFENSE
House Republicans downplay the military's extremism problem
BY NICK NIEDZWIADEK

“Patriot” extremism, according to the document, holds that the U.S. government “has become corrupt, has overstepped its constitutional boundaries or is no longer capable of protecting the people against foreign threats.” Adherents reject the government’s authority to tax and govern, believe they don’t have to follow the law, and, in some cases, form militias and call for the government to be violently overthrown.

It cites as examples the symbols of the Oath Keepers and Boogaloo Boys, both of which took part in the Capitol attack. It also lists groups such as the Sovereign Citizens and Proud Boys.

Anarchists  extremism, meanwhile, opposes all forms of government, the document says, along with capitalism and corporations. It cites as examples the left-wing Antifa and Occupy movements, as well as the Workers' Solidarity Alliance,

The third main category of extremists is organized around "Ethnic/Racial Supremacy," which blames the U.S. government for “forcing race mixing.”

“While the vast majority of these groups hold white supremacist views," the document states, "a wide array of ethnic and racial groups hold similar beliefs about the supremacy of their ethnicity or race." Its examples include Aryan Nations and the Ku Klux Klan, Evropa and Atomwaffen Division.

The document also singles out violent Islamic terrorist groups such as ISIS and the conspiracy movement QAnon.

The slides list other radical ideologies that don’t specifically target the military, including religious extremism, environmental extremism, and “Anti-feminism."

It says religious extremists espouse purity through subjugation or elimination of other religions. But it also warns that "Christian extremism is often conflated with white supremacy for a joint ideology focused on racial and religious purity which they believe to be God's intention."


Anti-feminists "openly call for the attack, raping and killing of women,” it reads.


“Primary target: Women, especially women they perceive as attractive (referred to as ‘Stacys’) who sexually reject or would likely reject unattractive men; attractive men (referred to as 'Chads') who are not sexually rejected by women; feminists; men who don’t stand against feminism.”


But how to spot extremists is proving to be exceedingly difficult because the language, symbols, tattoos and other identifiers they use are regularly replaced with new ones.

"The landscape of home grown extremist ideologies is constantly evolving," the briefing slide explains.

The slides reflect the challenge of cracking down on extremists without singling out political views. Just this week, Republicans in Congress raised fresh concerns that the Pentagon effort could be overreaching and singling out conservatives.

“I’m very concerned that we’re seeing people through all walks of society lose their jobs and other things simply because of a Facebook post or some other post that was made when somebody was mad,” Rep. Austin Scott (R-Ga.) said during a hearing before the House Armed Services Committee on the issue.

Marine Corps veteran Michael Berry, general counsel for the First Liberty Institute, a nonprofit organization that defends religious liberty, told the panel that he has seen Defense Department publications "indicating that people who identify as evangelical Christian or Catholic or of other faith groups are at least considered possibly extremist."

"You're essentially telling those who are, according to data, most likely to join our military, that they're unwelcome that they should look somewhere else," he said.

Some Democrats also expressed concern over the military inadvertently punishing troops for their political opinions or religious views. "It is not the case that extremism is simply anyone who disagrees with your political views and I think increasingly I've seen some who sort of take it to that level," said the panel's chair, Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.). "People who serve in the military are entitled to have political views. Those views will undoubtedly be different from each other."

Other Republicans on the panel also downplayed the warnings that the ranks have been infiltrated because the Pentagon lacks hard data and has been relying mostly on anecdotal information.

“We lack any concrete evidence that violent extremism is as ripe in the military as some commentators claim,” said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), the committee’s top Republican. “While I agree with my colleagues that these numbers should be zero, this is far from the largest military justice issue facing our armed services.”