Wednesday, January 25, 2006

The Last Poll

There was lots of speculation in the penultimate days before the Canadian election about which polls were the most accurate, and subsequently whose polling companies would be toast. Much speculation went on with the Blogging Tories that SES which did not give their party the big lead was out to lunch. Progressive Bloggers on the otherhand took heart over the SES polls. As it was SES faired the best being the closest to the actual vote count. Damn close. But for you poll junkies who need one more hit here is an interesting American site with an analysis of the polls. Political Arithmetik

And while we are speaking of polls the UBC Election Stockmarket Poll did amazingly well showing that a real marketplace in votes could replace Bay Street. Or was it Bay Street could marketize voting. If so you would not lose money betting on SES.

How well did we do? ESM vs. Pollsters (Popular Vote Predictions)

LIB CPC NDP BLQ OTR Absolute
Error
1. SES Research (Jan. 22) 30.1 36.4 17.4 10.6 5.6 0.4
2. UBC ESM (Jan. 22) 28.1 37.6 17.8 10.5 6.0 4.2
3. Strategic Counsel (Jan. 22) 27 37 19 11 6 6.3
4. Ekos (Jan. 20) 26.9 37.1 19.5 11.5 4.6 8.1
5. Ipsos-Reid (Jan. 22) 27 38 19 12 4 9.6


How well did we do? ESM vs. Other Seat Projections

LIB CPC NDP BLQ OTR Absolute
Error
1. Milton Chan
(electionprediction.org)
104 118 29 56 1 12.0
2. UBC ESM 95.5 125.2 32.6 53.4 1.2 15.0
3. Gregory Morrow
(democraticspace.com)
94 128 29 56 1 18.0
4. SES Research 84 134 34 55 1 36.0
5. Laurier Institute (LISPOP) 78 140 33 56 1 50.0
6. Jordan O'Brien (jord.ca) 72 135 38 62 1 62.0
7. Strategic Counsel 56 149 41 61 1 94.0
8. EKOS (Jan 20) 53 151 41 62 1 100.0
9. Ipsos-Reid (Jan 21) 46 157 42 62 1 114.0





Tags





No comments:

Post a Comment