It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Sunday, December 03, 2006
Some Same Sex Marriage Ok Say Tories
How did they get this? Could it have been leaked to them from the PMO.....
OTTAWA, December 1, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - LifeSiteNews.com has obtained the wording of the Conservative Motion to be debated next week. Parliamentary sources have revealed that the motion states: "That this house call on the government to introduce legislation to restore the traditional definition of marriage without affecting civil unions, and while respecting existing same sex marriages."
So the Conservatives will recognize existing Same Sex Marriages while saying Marriage is to be defined as being between a Man and a Woman.
This makes about as much sense as saying "We recognize the world is round except we believe it is flat."
The Tories are still recognizing and supporting Same Sex Marriages, as long as they were done under the existing law. So what happens after this motion fails to pass? Because it's a 10000000 to 1 shot it passes. Or if it actually passed?
Nothing. It's another waste of Parliaments time just like their Quebecois are a nation, motion.
A tip o' the blog to Red Tory
See
SSM
Same Sex Marriage
Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Same Sex Marriage, SSM, gay marriage, Canada, heterosexual, marriage, Conservatives, Government, PM, PMO, Lifesite, homosexual, gay, lesbian, GLBT, LGBT, evangelical, marriage-vote ,
Christian, Conservatives, Stephen Harper, Canadian Government, parliament, right-wing, social conservatives, MP, free-vote,
No comments:
Post a Comment