IT IS MISOGYNY

Toxic Masculinity, A Root Cause for Mass Shootings

If a mass shooter doesn't have an assault rifle, he can't kill a mass number of people. This is crucial. However, if we want to eliminate this problem altogether, we also need to focus on the deeper reasons of how these killers are created.

Tirza Clarke listens as the names of victims of recent mass shootings are read aloud during a vigil at the Sunrise Amphitheater on May 28, 2022 in Sunrise, Florida. Moms Demand Action, a national organization that works to prevent gun violence, held the vigil to mourn the victims of the mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

REAGAN ROSS

June 2, 2022

In 2009, I wrote a short op-ed for The Oregonian on why men—and it is almost always men—become mass shooters. Re-reading the piece, I think it still holds up fairly well, though what is distressing is how 13 years later, we still find ourselves with this disturbing phenomenon. Considering the massacre of little children at Robb Elementary School and the Buffalo massacre, I felt compelled to re-visit my thoughts, amplify some key points. Most pointedly, like so many others, I am especially tormented by this recent atrocity, the killing of children aged 9 thru 11. Like how I felt about the Sandy Hook tragedy, I cannot fathom how such horrors can be inflicted on our children. And like so many others, I am with those who stress guns as the simplest way to ameliorate these mass shootings. Gun regulation is absolutely essential to at least cutting down on the number of mass shootings, legislation like background checks and assault rifle bans especially—obviously—key to keep weapons of war out of the hands of potential deranged killers.

Monsters Are Not Born, They Are Created

But, to my mind, as I touched on in that earlier piece—titled "Young mena and violence"—to truly end these horrors and to just create a safer society in general, we need to get at the root causes of what turns these people/kids into killers. After all, as I've said so many times to whomever will listen, monsters are not born, they are created. And if we want to stop them from being created, just subjecting them to our hate and/or punishing them is not enough. We must get at the root causes of what creates them and stop them from being created.

While there are many root causes to this complex issue, to my mind, the most crucial element are toxic masculinity ideologies that create toxic masculinity men. I've been researching masculinity for over twenty years, and it has become clear to me that toxic masculinity ideologies (compounded by other toxic ideologies—I'll come back to this in a moment) are a crucial root cause for what is to my mind a deeply unhealthy (toxic) masculinity in our culture.

Defining Toxic Masculinity

By toxic masculinity ideologies I'm referring to patriarchy, phallocentrism, and hypermasculinity. Patriarchy is a way of being that entails normalizing such toxic attributes as dominance, power, control, and authority/hierarchizing. Patriarchy is associated with paternalism or what psychoanalyst/theorist Jacques Lacan called "the law of the father," the belief that men—and it usually is men though not always (think Margaret Thatcher!)—are the inexorable authority figure, determining the choices and ways of being of Others. Patriarchal/toxic masculinity men believe that this is their entitled position in the world and when they don't get it, they feel aggrieved. Phallocentrism is defined by how we center and encourage phallic (masculine) power, the phallus being a symbol for masculine power and that which is used to reinforce and prove one's masculinity. Guns of course are the prototypical phallic symbol of masculine power. Hypermasculinity is defined as the suppression of attributes ideologically associated with the "feminine" and the accentuation of those attributes ideologically defined as "masculine," e.g., the suppression of emotion and other "feminine" attributes (empathy, sympathy, compassion, etc.), dominating Others (people of color, people of different nationalities/ethnicities, women, LGBTQ+ people, those deemed un-masculine or "weak," etc.), violence as a natural and necessary outlet and response, stressing "manly" (phallic) characteristics and behavior (showy displays of one's power and dominance, etc.) and so on. All the above are the ingredients for creating sociopaths; all told, toxic masculinity ideologies turn men into unempathetic sociopaths.

Of course, only a tiny percentage of such toxic masculinity sociopaths become mass killers, but the point is not that this is the singular root cause but rather that it is a crucial base ingredient. I would argue that all toxic masculinity men are sociopaths, they just exhibit that sociopathy in different ways. In short, the combination of a striving for power, dominance, control, and authority—the constant need to reinforce one's sense of a phallic masculine self—combined with a low degree or even zero degree of empathy and compassion for Others creates the conditions for sociopathy. We see this not only with these (mostly white) male mass shooters (and other destructive males) but also with the men who create the conditions for these mass shooters to exist, phallic men both keeping in place this unhealthy and dangerous hypermasculinity in men (be "manly," don't show emotions, exert your authority, don't seek help for mental health issues, etc.) and giving such men an outlet to constantly reinforce their never ending need to reinforce their masculinity, whether that be in the form of phallic guns or seeing other people as Others. In terms of latter, toxic masculinity men have always needed an Other to differentiate the self, people of color, women, LGBTQ+ people, Jewish people, etc. existing for them to constantly give them an Other that distinguishes their self as superior, the feeling and expression of "superiority" itself registering for them their sense of their own phallic (masculine) power. (I'm not specifically focusing on this element here but when toxic masculinity and white supremacy/xenophobia/LGBTQphobia/misogyny/anti-Semitism are combined we get yet another root cause for many of these mass shootings, the Buffalo mass shooting being the latest example.)

Compounding Toxic Ideologies

I should just touch on here a compounding element in this toxic stew, other toxic ideologies. Capitalism especially exacerbates toxic masculinity ideologies. In short, capitalism is a mercenary, predatory, survival of the fittest economic system/ideology and it breeds this way of being in people. Indeed, I would argue that capitalism is a patriarchy ideology, which is in part why it became the economic system/ideology of choice, since it too informs in so many ways toxic masculinity ways of being. One could even make the case that our most successful capitalists are successful because they must be sociopaths, their entire way of being living for constant and relentless—albeit unsustainable—profit increases and growth, which can only happen at the expense of Others and the planet, which are constantly dominated, controlled, and exploited. As I suggest above, other toxic ideologies also compound toxic masculinity ideologies, such as religious belief systems, white supremacy, and heteronormativity, all of which are Othering ideologies that potentially feed that need for toxic masculinity men to reinforce their sense of (superior) phallic power.

Of course, more pointedly, capitalism is also behind the drive by the NRA to keep assault rifles on the market, a key source of much of their profit and power. That, in turn, is why the NRA pours so much money into the coffers of politicians, mostly Republicans but some Democrats as well. Both the NRA and NRA owned politicians can't come out and say that, so they use toxic masculinity ideologies for their own self-interest, exploiting toxic masculinity ideologies in ways that feed toxic masculinity men's need for their phallic power, guns again being a key reinforcer but also just doing what right wingers have learned to do so well, create alternative realities (disinformation, conspiracy theories) that also feed into phallic drives that reinforce masculinity. We see this with the NRA's disinformation campaigns that Democrats wanting to ban assault rifles is just the first step to "taking your guns away." The many conspiracy theories on the dangers of our government all are based on the tried and true tactics of using fear, hatred, and rage to create a threat that needs to be engaged, the source of (white nationalist) militias and assault rifle ownership.

The Essential Need for Gun Safety

Bringing this back to mass shooters, the easiest response (or one would think!) to addressing this horrifying "new normal" we seem to have come to disturbingly accept is to just create stringent gun regulations, like so many other countries have done with success, especially in terms of banning these weapons of war (assault guns) and installing rigorous background checks. The common sense of this is incontrovertible: If a mass shooter doesn't have an assault rifle, he can't kill a mass number of people. For certain, that would cut way down on mass shooters, as it did during the time period that assault guns were actually banned in this country, from 1995 to 2004.

Making the Explicit Link to Mass Shooters

However, if we want to eliminate this problem altogether (and ameliorate other issues, such as the ever present threat of authoritarianism and fascism, which are direct toxic masculinity ideologies), we also need to focus on the root causes of these killers and that means understanding and addressing how these killers are created. The shooter who slaughtered our children at Robb Elementary purportedly had a speech impediment and was cruelly bullied when he was young, bullying also a symptom of our unhealthy toxic masculinity culture. He also apparently had a terrible home environment. Such an upbringing couldn't have but led to a thoroughly dysfunctional individual and untreated mental health issues. That doesn't mean of course that every such young person with mental illnesses will become a killer, but it does mean that many if not most toxic masculinity young men will have issues that left untreated could potentially lead to (self) destructive choices. That is, when young toxic masculinity men with mental illnesses grow up in a society permeated with toxic masculinity ideological indoctrination and messaging, that influence—that combination—can potentially lead to the most disturbing of (self) destructive choices.

More pointedly, like so many other young toxic masculinity males who are filled with a sense of victimization or lack of control—all of which for toxic masculinity males can only induce a feeling of emasculation—the Robb Elementary shooter chose to express that rage and hate in the only way that toxic masculinity men can, through acts of phallic violence. Most if not all shooters feel wronged or persecuted in some way and thus need to fight back in a way that gives them back a feeling of power and dominance and control—gives them back their sense of phallic power—mass shootings becoming one avenue to that end. Even the suicide aspect of this act could be seen as empowering, since this final act is part of their need to reassert control, not to mention that in their twisted minds, they can only see their heinous act as some glorious act of (phallic) retribution or pay back against a society that has caused them so much pain and suffering.

The Struggle for Fundamental Change Continues

In some ways, talking just about guns is an easy way out for well-intentioned (Democratic) politicians and pundits, since focusing on the real root causes—yes, toxic masculinity ideologies but also capitalism, consumerism, white supremacy/xenophobia, heteronormativity, misogyny—is challenging to say the least especially in terms of forcing us to confront aspects of ourselves that would necessitate real radical (progressive) change. But since the very politicians, pundits, and general populace who we need to enact such change are also deeply entwined in the very (toxic) ideological norms that we need to change, I'm afraid such changes mean a very long struggle indeed for those of us doing the heavy lifting of enacting such changes. Still, we have seen the beginnings of this radical change, both here in this country and around the world (for one thing, masculinity is getting healthier, especially with younger generations). And so even though this struggle to progress humanity to a more humanitarian way of being is long and hard and ongoing, it is happening and that becomes the impetus for all of us to never end the struggle for a better, healthier masculinity/humanity.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.



REAGAN ROSS is an assistant professor at Montana State University. He teaches film and media studies, with a focus on gender studies and masculinity studies.

Codify Arctic Refuge Protections, Say Campaigners Amid Big Oil Exodus

"We support Congress and the Biden administration taking long-overdue action to... reestablish protections for this crown jewel of our national wildlife refuge system," said one activist.

Gwich'in Arctic defenders pose outside the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2022 in Washington, D.C., where the Indigenous activists met with members of Congress and the Biden administration.

 (Photo: Sierra Club/Twitter)


BRETT WILKINS

June 2, 2022

Conservationists and climate campaigners on Thursday welcomed the news that another fossil fuel company has canceled a controversial Trump-era lease to drill for oil in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, while calling on policymakers to permanently protect the pristine wilderness from future threats.

"As oil companies terminate and cancel leases, it's time for Congress to stop the leasing program for good."

According to the Anchorage Daily News, Regenerate Alaska, a subsidiary of Australia-based 88 Energy, joined Hilcorp and Chevron—which earlier this week terminated pre-existing leases inside the ANWR—in canceling its lease. Major banks and insurers have also stopped financing and covering Arctic fossil fuel projects.

"These exits clearly demonstrate that international companies recognize what we have known all along," said the Gwich'in Steering Committee, a group of Arctic defenders from the country's northernmost Indigenous people.

"Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is not worth the economic risk and liability that results from development on sacred lands without the consent of Indigenous peoples," the committee added.

Regenerate Alaska, the only company to directly acquire land in the 19.3 million-acre refuge, bid about $800,000 to lease 23,000 acres along the reserve's western boundary during the January 2021 lease sale.

However, the Biden administration last year blocked new exploration inside ANWR, while subsequently ordering a review of its predecessor's controversial move to open up the previously protected refuge to fossil fuel extraction as part of its national energy independence policy.

"This is positive news for the climate and the human rights of Indigenous people whose survival depends on a healthy, thriving calving ground for the Porcupine caribou herd, and further proves that the oil industry recognizes drilling on sacred lands is bad business," Karlin Itchoak, the Alaska state director at the Wilderness Society, said in a statement.


Peter Winsor, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, said in a statement that "88 Energy canceling its lease interest on the heels of Chevron and Hilcorp divesting themselves of their own Arctic Refuge holdings is the clearest sign yet that there is zero interest out there in industrializing the wildest place left in America. We have long known that the American people don't want drilling in the Arctic Refuge."

The Gwich'in call the area "Iizhik Gwats'an Gwandaii Goodlit"—or "the sacred place where life begins"—and rely on the region's rich biodiversity, especially its 200,000-strong Porcupine caribou herd, for their survival.

Around 270 species call the refuge home, including all of the world's remaining South Beaufort Sea polar bears, 250 musk oxen, Arctic foxes, and hundreds of thousands of snow geese and other birds which fly there from all 50 states and around the world.

The Republican-controlled Congress approved drilling in the massive, pristine ANWR in 2017. In what was called a parting gift to the fossil fuel industry, the Trump administration in its final weeks held the lease auction that raised only $14.4 million and drew no bids from major fossil fuel corporations.

"The 2021 oil and gas lease sale for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge was an epic failure, generating less than 1% of the revenue outlined in the 2017 Tax Act," Winsor noted.

Referring to ANWR drilling, he added that "the Gwich'in people don't want it, and we now have further proof that the oil industry doesn't want it either."

"Companies are already pulling out of their leases—let's permanently protect this land."

"Congress opened the Arctic Refuge to oil drilling in 2017 backed by the ridiculous promise of industry enthusiasm leading to billions in federal revenue from lease sales," Winsor added. "That promise continues to be exposed for the lie that was and we support Congress and the Biden administration taking long-overdue action to restore fiscal common sense and reestablish protections for this crown jewel of our national wildlife refuge system."

Ellen Montgomery, public lands campaign director at Environment America, said in a statement that "oil companies, including 88 Energy, Chevron, and Hilcorp, have recognized that there is no future for fossil fuel extraction in this sensitive environment. As oil companies terminate and cancel leases, it's time for Congress to stop the leasing program for good."

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) joined the conservationists' calls to codify ANWR protections.

"Drilling in the Arctic Refuge poses huge risks to the Gwich'in, to threatened Arctic ecosystems, and to our climate. It's all risk, no reward," he tweeted Thursday. "Companies are already pulling out of their leases—let's permanently protect this land."

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Cocaine Trafficking Case of Erdoğan Associate Appears to Be a Tactic to Deflect Pressure

by Abdullah Bozkurt
Nordic Monitor
June 2, 2022

Abdullah Bozkurt, a Middle East Forum Writing Fellow, is a Swedish-based investigative journalist and analyst who runs the Nordic Research and Monitoring Network and is chairman of the Stockholm Center for Freedom.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (L) with Ali Osman Akat (R), who was arrested and released on drug trafficking charges.

The arrest and release of a Turkish businessman close to the government on drug trafficking charges, only after an alert from German authorities, appears to follow classic stalling tactics often used by the government of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to deflect international criticism.

Time and again the Erdoğan government has "sandbagged" efforts to effectively investigate criminal conduct when the investigation incriminated or implicated senior government officials, members of the ruling Islamist elite or their associates.

At times, it allowed investigations and judicial proceedings to move forward only in a very controlled environment to paint a false picture that the government is cracking down on criminal or terrorist elements when in fact it is doing nothing but whitewashing wrongdoings or helping criminals go free with a slap on the wrist.

This case looks to be one of those the Erdoğan government is keen to contain. Ali Osman Akat, the owner of companies selling cosmetic products under the name Lactone Holding A.Ş. and Lactone Kozmetik A.Ş., was identified as a suspect in a drug trafficking network after German federal customs service Bundeszollverwaltung officers searched the contents of a Turkey-bound shipment. The cargo left Bogota, Colombia, and arrived in Istanbul after going through Customs while in transit in Panama, the US and Germany.

The inspection at Leipzig/Halle Airport on November 20, 2021 of three pieces of cargo revealed 116 kilograms of cocaine mixed in with iron dust particles. German police alerted Turkey and provided a copy of their inspection. At the request of Turkey, German authorities agreed to let the shipment proceed with mutual consent that the bust would be made in Turkey at the final destination where the suspects would receive the cargo.

The recipient of the cargo was listed as Süleyman Yekenkunrul, owner of trading firm Prufier İç ve Dış Ticaret Ltd. Şirketi and an associate of Akat. It was sent from a man named Carlos Aguilar Call from Colombia. The contact phone for the delivery belonged to Tevfik Akan Atak, an employee of Akat and the general coordinator at Lactone for foreign trade.

The cargo was taken from Germany by Turkish Customs officials and brought back to Istanbul on December 7, 2021. The findings of the German authorities were verified in a separate inspection done at a lab in Ankara on December 13, 2021.

Under orders from the Turkish prosecutor, gendarmes replaced the cocaine with sand of the same color — which was odd and against standard operating procedure in such planned busts — delivered the cargo posing as couriers to the listed address in Istanbul's Maslak district and detained six people on December 15, 2021.

In the arraignment on December 17, Akat was quickly released by the investigating judge and Atak and Yekenkunrul were formally arrested. The same judge who ordered Akat's release decided to arrest him on January 6, 2022 after a challenge filed by the prosecutor, which means a political directive was conveyed to the court that Akat was to remain in pretrial detention for a while. Other suspects Ali Karataş, Sarra Chouıekh and Mustafa Güldiken were all released pending trial.

Akat was again released at the first hearing on May 20, 2022.

Among the red flags in the case that make it appear to be a hush-up operation rather than a real crackdown on cocaine traffickers is that the bust was never publicized by the government, which is unusual. In most cases the Interior Ministry and the police invite the press to take photos and videos of the seized drugs and the suspects, and an official statement is issued describing how successful law enforcement was in the operation.

This never happened. The public knew about it only four months later when the Sabah daily, owned by President Erdoğan's family, decided to run a story, on April 13, 2022. The paper had footage from the bust, which means the government leaked it at a time that would best serve its interests. More likely, the Erdoğan government wanted to make the case public to ease the pressure amid serious allegations that Turkey had turned into a cocaine trafficking route amid seizures of drugs in Spain, Colombia and other places that were destined for Turkey.

But it appears the Erdoğan government did not intend to seriously pursue the case after an initial splash in the media, and judges controlled by the Erdoğan government quietly let Akat go at the first hearing, during which he blamed one of his employees and said the employee ordered the shipment containing the cocaine.

Although Akat and five other suspects were indicted on drug trafficking charges with a recommended 135 years in prison in total for the suspects, his quick release from prison at the first hearing in the case further confirmed suspicions that the government is keen to derail the case at the end. The opposition parties in Parliament criticized the government and asked under whose orders the key suspect was released despite serious charges against him.

In his defense, Akat denied having any knowledge of the drugs and blamed Atak, the general coordinator of the company. Phone records and chat messages, however, showed that Akat had frequently given orders to Atak in Customs matters, prompting the prosecutor to believe that such a high value cargo could not have been shipped without prior authorization of the owner.

In August 2017 Akat became president of the Turkish American Business Association (TABA), a business interest group that was established in 1987 to promote business relations between the US and Turkey, to encourage American investment in Turkey and to assist its members in networking. It is also a representative of American Chamber of Commerce in Turkey. He served there for five years.

His membership in TABA was terminated after the news of his arrest over the cocaine bust was made public.

Photos shared by Akat on social media show he is close to senior government officials. He has pictures with President Erdoğan, Parliament Speaker Mustafa Şentop and a number of Cabinet ministers including Interior Minister Süleyman Soylu, in charge of cracking down on drug trafficking. He had a contract to supply cleaning products to parliament and made 348,000 Turkish lira from the sale.

In one picture he also appeared next to Egemen Bağış, a disgraced former minister who was in the past charged with taking bribes from an Iranian operative. Bağış is currently serving as Turkish ambassador to Czechia and has allegedly been facilitating drug trafficking in Europe using his diplomatic privileges.

Lactone does not have a long track record in business but quickly expanded to increase its capital to 12 million Turkish lira in 2020 from 200,000 Turkish lira in 2017.

Akat's lawyer claimed the innocence of his client and his hope that he will be exonerated of all charges.

Nordic Monitor previously reported that Turkey has become an emerging route for large-scale cocaine trafficking, an unprecedented development, and it is alleged that a politically connected, powerful new player may have appeared on the scene to move large quantities of the drug through Turkish seaports.

The spotlight turned on Turkey in June 2020 when Colombia's narcotics police seized almost five tons of cocaine. The drug was in two containers that were to travel by sea from the port of Buenaventura to Turkey and had a street value of $265 million in the illegal market.

Sedat Peker, a convicted mob boss and former ally of the Turkish president, also claimed senior government officials were involved in the cocaine trade. Peker named Interior Minister Soylu and his associates as influential people who were involved in facilitating the cocaine trafficking through Turkey. Peker had partnered with Soylu for years in running criminal syndicates.

AND THAT SAYS IT ALL ABOUT INFLATION

Credit card borrowing hits 16-year high as mortgage approvals crash, says BofE

31May2022


Credit card borrowing hits 16-year high as mortgage approvals crash, says BofE

Mortgage borrowing dropped by over a third in April, while credit card borrowing rose to a 16-year high as the cost of living crisis begins to hit consumers, according to recent data.

According to the Bank of England, net mortgage borrowing in April fell to £4.1 billion. This represents a stark 36% month-on-month drop, down from a total of £6.4 billion borrowed in March.

At the same time, Brits used credit cards to borrow around £700 million in April, an 11.6% rise compared to April 2021 - the highest annual jump in credit card spending since 2005.

When including overdrafts, personal loans, and car finance with these figures, a total of £1.4 billion was borrowed in the UK last month. This is the third month in a row that consumer borrowing has topped £1 billion, according to the BofE.

Both of these figures represent ominous signs that the British public is beginning to feel the impact of the cost of living crisis. Rising energy prices and record inflation has led to the biggest reduction in domestic disposable income in decades.

Speaking on the decline of mortgage borrowing, Hina Bhudia, partner at Knight Frank Finance, said: “Activity among purchasers is ebbing as the cost of living squeeze shrinks the pool of buyers. Rates on certain products have doubled in the past twelve months and there is a real sense of urgency among many borrowers who sense they must act soon or reassess what they can afford.”

The increase in personal borrowing, including credit cards and car finance, was also attributed to the cost of living crisis, with the head of personal finance at investment firm AJ Bell, Laura Suter, saying:

“As a nation we’ve now put more than £3billion on credit cards in the past three months, and another £1.6billion on other forms of credit, including personal loans and car finance.

“What the figures show is a divided nation, with many households still managing to save cash despite prices rising around them. Although it’s a far cry from the bumper savings the nation was making during lockdown, with the prospect of tougher timers ahead lots of households have tightened their belts and saved some cash in their emergency funds.”

ATTENTION; WE ARE IN A PANDEMIC

Older Americans bore brunt of COVID-19 deaths during the omicron wave

More than 300 Americans are still dying of COVID-19 each day.

ByArielle Mitropoulos
June 01, 2022

A registered nurse administers a dose of COVID-19 vaccine to an 85 year-old woman at a state run vaccine hub inside the Allen Senior Citizens Housing Complex in Queens, New York, Feb. 20, 2021.
Anthony Behar/Sipa USA via AP

From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the elderly have borne the brunt of the virus’ deadly wrath.

Now, newly updated federal data shows that despite widespread vaccination among seniors, virus death rates among older Americans surged to near-record levels during the first omicron wave.

Over 90% of seniors have been fully vaccinated, but about 30% of those fully vaccinated have yet to receive their first booster shot. To date, just under 10 million Americans 65 and older have received their second booster — representing about 28.5% of those who had already received their first shot.

Even with overall high vaccination rates in older populations, nearly three-quarters of the COVID-19 deaths reported in the U.S. have been among people over the age of 65.

Experts say the reason for the renewed surge may be due to a number of factors, including waning immunity, relatively low booster uptake compared to primary vaccination series and general vulnerability to the virus among the group. In addition, the sheer scale of the spread of the virus during the omicron wave was significantly higher compared to prior waves of the virus.

Although the number of virus-related deaths in Americans over 75 has consistently been higher than all other age groups, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were some lulls.

As the virus receded in late June 2021, and the group's vacci​nation rate increased, the death rates for those older age groups approached levels comparable to younger people.

However, during the delta wave, in late 2021 and 2022, the disparities in death rates began to increase again with the more transmissible variant, which was better at evading vaccines. They further widened when the omicron wave hit the U.S. in the winter of 2021, a variant that was even more transmissible than delta.

A Covid-19 patient on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) floor at Hartford Hospital in Hartford, Connecticut, Jan. 31, 2022.
Allison Dinner/Bloomberg via Getty Images, FILE

In early January 2022, CDC death data -- broken down by age group per 100,000 people -- shows that people over 75 had a COVID-19 death rate that was 136 times higher than that of people between the ages of 18 and 29. Similarly, people between 65 and 74 had a COVID-19 death rate that was 45 times higher than that of people between the ages of 18 and 29.

MORE: Reported COVID-19 infection levels nearly 6 times higher than last Memorial Day

Throughout the spring, overall death rates took a downturn again, as the first omicron wave receded, but as of mid-April, older Americans continue to see more deaths than younger populations.

In recent months, Hispanic Americans 75 and older have had a death rate per capita that was notably higher than other demographic groups of the same age.

During the omicron surge in January, Hispanic Americans over 75 were 2.7 times more likely to die from COVID-19, compared to white Americans and Asian Americans of the same age. They were also 1.7 times more likely to die from COVID-19, compared to their Black counterparts, and 3.7 times more likely to die compared to their American Indian/Alaska Natives.

Last month, the CDC announced that it is "strengthening" its recommendation for Americans over the age of 12 who are immunocompromised and those over the age of 50 receive their second booster shot.

"Only 38% of those 50 to 64 and 43% of those 65 and older have received a vaccine dose in the past six months. This leaves about 60% of older Americans without the protection they may need to prevent severe disease, hospitalization, and death," CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a meeting of the agency's independent advisors in May. "We know immunity wanes over time, and we need to do all we can now to protect those most vulnerable."

Monkeypox caseload rises over 550 from 30 countries: WHO

IANS

JUN 2, 2022, 12:26 IST

The monkeypox virus may be spreading 'undetected', said the World Health Organisation even as the global confirmed cases rise to more than 550 from 30 countries that are not endemic to the virus.

While, so far, most cases have been reported among men who have sex with men presenting with symptoms at sexual health clinics, "the sudden appearance of monkeypox in many countries at the same time suggests there may have been undetected transmission for some time," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, in a statement.

The virus may have been transmitted for months or years undetected though investigations are ongoing and there are clear no answers yet, added Dr. Rosamund Lewis, the WHO's monkeypox technical lead, during a news conference in Geneva.


"We don't really know whether it's too late to contain. What WHO and all member states are trying to do is prevent onward spread," Lewis said. Contact tracing and isolating patients who have monkeypox are crucial to stopping the spread, she said.

Earlier the WHO had refuted the need to avoid LGBTQ+ parades, as the virus itself is not a sexually transmitted infection, which are generally spread through semen and vaginal fluids.

"These communities are working hard to inform their members about the risks of monkeypox, and prevent transmission," Ghebreyesus said, adding the need to "work hard to fight stigma".

He noted that stigma against the LGBTQ+ community could "prevent infected individuals from seeking care, making it harder to stop transmission".

The global health body has also urged affected countries to widen their surveillance, to look for cases in the broader community.

Monkeypox has not previously been described as a sexually transmitted infection, but it can be passed on by direct contact during sex.

Anyone can be infected with monkeypox if they have close physical contact with someone else who is infected.

"The situation is evolving, and we expect that more cases will continue to be found," the WHO chief said.

While monkeypox symptoms resolve on their own, it "can also be severe in some cases".

Ghebreyesus said that the WHO is working to provide accurate information to those groups most at risk of monkeypox; to prevent further spread among at-risk groups; to protect frontline health workers; as well as to advance understanding of this disease.

Meanwhile, even as some countries are racing to stockpile smallpox vaccines against monkeypox, the WHO has not recommended mass vaccination.

But, the WHO is working with companies to increase access to those new vaccines and treatments, Lewis said.

Monkeypox: Young men in London make up majority of UK cases, new data reveals

LILY WAKEFIELD 

JUNE 2, 2022
PINK NEWS

Monkeypox lesions. (UKHSA)

Young men living in London are making up the majority of UK monkeypox cases, new data has revealed.

The total number of confirmed monkeypox cases in the UK has now passed 200, with 199 cases in England, five in Scotland, two in Northern Ireland and one in Wales, as of Thursday (2 June)

On Wednesday (1 June), the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) released more information about the populations affected by monkeypox.

Although monkeypox can affect anyone, of the 190 UK cases confirmed from 6 to 30 May, more than half (111) were among men who have sex with men. Just two of those infected were women.

In England, 86 per cent of cases were detected in London, and almost all of those infected (87 per cent) were young, from 20 to 49 years old. Travel to other European countries within the three weeks before diagnosis was only reported in 18 per cent of cases.

So far, UKHSA investigations have “identified links to gay bars, saunas and the use of dating apps in the UK and abroad”, the agency said.

It said it was working with LGBTQ+ organisations like the Terrence Higgins Trust, Stonewall and Grindr, as well as with the British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) and the British HIV Association, to provide queer communities with public health information about monkeypox. The LGBT Consortium and Pride organisers have also been asked to share this information.

However it said the UKHSA would continued to investigate, as “currently no single factor or exposure that links the cases has been identified”.

Last month, the UK purchased 20,000 doses of the Imvanex vaccine, a smallpox vaccine that has has proved to be about 85 per cent effective in preventing monkeypox, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

The vaccine is being offered to people who have had contact with a confirmed case of monkeypox, as well as to healthcare workers.

Dr Meera Chand, director of clinical and emerging infections at UKHSA, said: “We are working to break chains of transmission, including by contact tracing and vaccination.

“We are grateful to everyone who has come forward for testing and it is extremely important that everyone continues to be aware of the symptoms and to seek advice if they have concerns.

“We are reminding people to look out for new spots, ulcers or blisters on any part of their body. If anyone suspects they might have monkeypox, particularly if they have recently had a new sexual partner, they should limit their contact with others and contact NHS 111 or their local sexual health service as soon as possible, though please phone ahead before attending in person.”

JAMES CONNELLY IS ROLLING IN HIS GRAVE

Even separatists Sinn Fein praise 'dedicated' Queen as she celebrates her Platinum Jubilee: 

Republican leader Michelle O'Neill praises monarch for her 'significant' contribution to peace in Northern Ireland

Michelle O'Neill thanked the Queen for her 'warmth and unfailing courtesy'

Wrote of 'value and respect' she had for monarch's contribution to reconciliation

Significant moment for the party, whose ultimate aim is reunification of Ireland

ABOLISH THE MONARCHY

By DAVID WILCOCK, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED:  2 June 2022

Irish republicans Sinn Fein have congratulated the Queen on her Platinum Jubilee, hailing her 'dedicated' service and 'significant' contribution to the peace process in Northern Ireland.

In a letter to the monarch, the party's vice president and leader in Ulster Michelle O'Neill thanked the Queen for her 'warmth and unfailing courtesy' when they had met.

She also wrote of the 'value and respect' she had for the monarch's contribution to reconciliation.

Harry has gone from the very essence of a popular 21st century Prince to skulking in side rooms with his most junior or obscure relatives. On his and Meghan's comeback, was the lack of a picture with William and Kate deliberate, asks RICHARD KAY , and other top stories from June 03, 2022.

The letter is a significant moment for the party, whose ultimate aim is the reunification of Ireland, and shows how serious it is about political power.

It also has historically close ties to the IRA, among whose victims during the decades of the Troubles was Lord Mountbatten of Burma.

Mountbatten was the Duke of Edinburgh's uncle and was close to Prince Charles before he was murdered in a bomb attack on his boat in Northern Ireland in 1979.

Former DUP leader Dame Arlene praised Ms O'Neill's gesture, telling BBC Radio Ulster the Jubilee celebrated three things - the Queen's public service and dedication; the institution of the monarchy; and the concept of Britishness.

'I think for republicans, like Michelle O'Neill, like Nicola Sturgeon, they have recognised in Her Majesty the Queen the first of those, the fact that she has given so much service to the country,' Dame Arlene said.

'They're recognising that and I think that that is something that is to be welcomed.'

In a letter to the monarch, the party's vice president and leader in Ulster Michelle O'Neill thanked the Queen for her 'warmth and unfailing courtesy' when they had met.


She also wrote of the 'value and respect' she had for the monarch's contribution to reconciliation. The Queen is pictured meeting former Sinn Fein deputy first minister Martin McGuinness in Belfast in 2012.


The letter is a significant moment for the party, whose ultimate aim is the reunification of Ireland. It also has historically close ties to the IRA, among whose victims during the decades of the Troubles was Lord Mountbatten of Burma (left), the Duke of Edinburgh's uncle

Former DUP leader Dame Arlene praised Ms O'Neill's gesture, telling BBC Radio Ulster the Jubilee celebrated three things - the Queen's public service and dedication; the institution of the monarchy; and the concept of Britishness

Ms O'Neill's letter to the Queen, which was sent last month and reported by the Belfast Telegraph on Thursday, read: 'I thought it best to write to you personally as you mark 70 years of dedicated public service to the British people as Monarch.

'Your Platinum Jubilee is an historic moment, especially for all those from the unionist and British tradition on the island of Ireland, and across these islands whom with great pride and devotion hold you very dear.

'Personally, I wish to thank you for your warmth and unfailing courtesy on the occasions in which both I and my late colleague, Martin McGuinness, met with you in Belfast in 2012 during your Diamond Jubilee, and thereafter at Windsor Castle during the State Visit of President of Ireland, Michael D Higgins to the UK in 2014.

'I wish to record the value and respect I place on the significant contribution you have made to the advancement of peace and reconciliation between the different traditions on our island, and between our two islands during those years of the peace process.

'As incoming First Minister of the Northern Ireland Executive I, like you, will take every opportunity to strengthen the bonds of friendship and renew the spirit of co-operation between those of us in the world of politics and public life from different traditions, and also the people and communities we proudly represent.'

Beacons will be lit at Northern Ireland's highest peak and most westerly town later to mark the Queen's Platinum Jubilee.

The official four-day celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Queen's coronation will include street parties, exhibitions, church services and lunch events.

Thursday will mark the start of a long bank holiday weekend which will also include a visit from the Earl and Countess of Wessex.

The Royal couple are expected to carry out two engagements in the region on Saturday.

A gun salute will take place at Hillsborough Castle, the Royal family's official residence in Northern Ireland, while in Belfast the HMS Pembroke will be alongside for the weekend and open to visitors with pre-booked tickets.

The UK's most westerly town, Enniskillen in Co Fermanagh, will enjoy one of the busiest celebrations.

Visitors can enjoy a special exhibition at Enniskillen Castle which will include a maid of honour gown and page outfit worn by local people who played key roles at the coronation.

It will also host a special church service at St Macartin's Cathedral on Thursday evening where the Queen visited in 2012 during her Diamond Jubilee, before beacons are lit.

As part of 1,500 beacons being lit across the UK between 9.15-9.45pm, many locations in Northern Ireland will host a lighting including Titanic Belfast in the capital city and St Columb's Cathedral in Londonderry as well as the region's highest peak.

The Walking With The Wounded charity will hike a beacon up Slieve Donard in Co Down, while their colleagues do the same at the other UK peaks, Ben Nevis, Scafell Pike and Mount Snowdon.

On Sunday, big lunch events will be taking place across the region, including on the Shankill Road and in the town of Bangor, Co Down which was made a city as part of the Jubilee celebrations.

Net-zero by 2050 means no fossil fuel car sales beyond 2038, says BNEF

JUNE 2, 2022
JOSHUA S. HILL

The global road transport sector can still reach net-zero emissions by 2050 through electrification, but urgent action is vital, and the last internal combustion vehicle (ICE) must be sold by 2038.

A new analysis from research company BloombergNEF (BNEF) the window to stay on track for net-zero road transport emissions by 2050 is still open. “But only just barely,” says Aleksandra O’Donovan, head of electric vehicles at BNEF.

“A big push is needed from governments, automakers, part suppliers and charging infrastructure providers in the years ahead.”

Currently, certain segments such as buses and two- and three-wheelers are close to being on track for net-zero, but more action is needed in other segments to get on track for net-zero by 2050 – especially in medium and heavy commercial vehicles.

A table provided by BNEF shows that passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles require a moderate amount of additional measures put in place to acheive net-zero goals.

However, it says that “strong additional measures” are urgently needed if medium and heavy duty vehicles are to meet zet-zero targets.



According to BNEF, passenger EV sales are set to accelerate rapidly over the next few years, jumping from 6.6 million sold in 2021 to 21 million sold in 2025.

Meanwhile, the fleet of EVs driving on our roads will grow from 16 million at the end of 2021 to hit 77 million by 2025 and 229 million by 2030.

This growth in EV uptake is already displacing 1.5 million barrels of oil demand per day – though most of this is from electric two- and three-wheelers in Asia. However, rising passenger EV sales will push this to 2.5 million barrels per day by 2025.
Oil demand by transport to peak in 2027

Overall, according to BNEF, oil demand from road transport will peak by 2027, as electrification spreads to all other areas of road transport beyond only passenger vehicles.

Similarly, sales of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles already peaked in 2017, according to BNEF, who expects the global fleet of ICE passenger vehicles to start declining starting in 2024.

However, to get on track for a net-zero global fleet by 2050, zero-emission vehicles need to account for 61% of global new passenger vehicles sales by 2030, 93% by 2035, with the last ICE vehicle of any segment needing to be sold by 2038 at the latest.

“Electric vehicles are a powerful tool in reducing global CO2 emissions from the transport sector,” said Colin McKerracher, head of the advanced transport team at BNEF and lead author of the report.

“There are very positive signs that the market is moving in the right direction, but more action is needed – especially when it comes to heavy trucks. Action also needs to focus on emerging markets, which need financial support to help enable and accelerate the transition to electric mobility of all types.”
Urgent action needed to reach net-zero transport scenarios

BNEF’s EVO outlines two scenarios for the uptake of electric transport through to 2050, examining for both the impacts on demand for batteries, materials, oil, electricity, infrastructure, and emissions.

The two scenarios are the Economic Transition Scenario (ETS), which assumes no new policies and regulations are enacted and the transition is driven by techno-economic trends and market forces, and the Net Zero Scenario (NZS), which is driven primarily by economics.

Urgent action is needed across both scenarios, however. BNEF points to the need for developed countries and multilateral institutions to include EV investments, incentives, and charging infrastructure deployments in their international climate finance plans, making capital available to emerging economies that have credible plans to develop a zero-emission vehicle sector.

Between the two scenarios in BNEFs report, the passenger EV fleet is expected to hit 469 million in 2035 in the Economic Transition Scenario, but needs to jump to 612 million by the same date in the Net Zero Scenario – a gap which must be met by emerging economies who are supported by wealthier countries so as to avoid a global slowdown of adoption.

Battery electric versus hydrogen transport

The BNEF EVO also explores whether batteries or hydrogen fuel cells will be the more likely solution for electrifying heavy-duty long-haul freight. It finds that – as megawatt-scale charging stations and the emergence of higher energy density batteries become more commonplace by the end of the decade – battery electric long-haul operations will become more viable.

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles may be able to help fill gaps here and there, especially in areas where electrification cannot reach – such as heavy vehicles, in some regions, or in duty cycles where batteries struggle.

Finally, the report notes that reducing car dependence through the prioritisation of public transport, walking, cycling, and other measures should be pursued wherever possible.

Specifically, even a 10% reduction in kilometres travelled by car by 2050 alone would lead to 200 million fewer cars on the road, reducing cumulative CO2 emissions by 2.25 gigatonnes. Such a decrease would also greatly alleviate strain on the battery supply chain.

Joshua S. Hill is a Melbourne-based journalist who has been writing about climate change, clean technology, and electric vehicles for over 15 years. He has been reporting on electric vehicles and clean technologies for Renew Economy and The Driven since 2012. His preferred mode of transport is his feet.

North Sea oil protestors throw red paint on UK Government building after Jackdaw approval

One protestor brought a sign depicting Boris Johnson with his arms wrapped around a lump of coal, reading: “It’s getting hot in here, so take off all your coal.”


By Sean McGill
Ruaraidh Britton

Trainee Reporter

 2 JUN 2022

Protestors threw paint on the building and wrote "Blood on your hands" in the paint (Image: Edinburgh Live)

Angry climate activists have thrown red paint on the UK Government building in Edinburgh after regulators approved the development of the Jackdaw gas field in the North Sea.

It was announced on Wednesday that Jackdaw field, off the coast of Aberdeen, will be capable of producing 6.5 percent of the UK’s gas output, reports EdinburghLive.

But the protestors opposed the move, believing it will put the future of the planet at risk, writing into the paint on the walls the words "Blood on your hands."

Upon hearing of the field’s approval, the capital-based activists sprang into action to organise the protest, and a large yellow banner was unfurled by the angry crowd, which read: “Clean gas is a dirty lie.”

Lucy Walczuk, one of the senior figures at Fridays for Future Edinburgh, felt that a sense of urgency was important in order to make a statement.

“We were expecting the announcement soon, so we’ve been preparing ahead of time,” they said.


“We want to effectively express that anger and annoyance at the failure of the UK Government. We got the details for the protest together in two or three hours and then invited as many people as possible.

“We organised this 18 hours ago and we got this many people to come through. I think it really shows how strongly people feel about this and how wrong a decision it is.”

The crowd gathered at 1pm outside Queen Elizabeth House, armed with signs and banners decorated with colourful messages.

One depicted Boris Johnson with his arms wrapped around a lump of coal, reading: “It’s getting hot in here, so take off all your coal.”

Several protestors brought signs and held them up outside the UK Government building (Image: Edinburgh Live)

While dominated by younger faces, there was a noticeable older contingent parked outside the Government building.

Penny Gower, a 72-year-old who works at Edinburgh College, expressed her worries about the future of young grandchildren.

“I look at my three little granddaughters, two babies and a seven-year-old, and I think what kind of life are they going to have? Climate crisis and chaos is likely to happen within the next ten years. Politicians are ignoring it.”

Multiple speeches took place at the event, with disgruntled speakers explaining their concerns over the now-approved gas field.

There was even a musical performance from 46-year old Majk Stokes, who sang that the government need to “smell the coffee” when it comes to the climate.

One climate activist held up a sign protesting the North Sea gas field (Image: Edinburgh Live)

Some protestors also jumped into a performance of the Macarena in between messages from the key speakers.

Demonstrators also hurled red paint at the building as emotions over the decision to develop the gas field ran high.

Those who back the development have cited Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a key reason behind the need for further gas supplies.

Bryce Goodall, one of the protestors who addressed the crowd, said the group stand in solidarity with Ukraine, but still ask more from the UK Government.

“It’s a global issue. If we can stop all oil fields in the UK and move away from fossil fuels, we wouldn’t need to be dependant on any country, including Russia. We can make that transition with our reserves right now.

“What we need is political willingness. Unfortunately, the Tory government is showing abject and inept leadership on this.”

Announcing the decision on Wednesday, Energy Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said the Government was “turbocharging” renewables.

He added: “Let’s source more of the gas we need from British waters to protect energy security."

Colombia higher court rules fracking pilot projects can go ahead

Thu, June 2, 2022

A man rides a canoe on the Magdalena River in Puerto Wilches


BOGOTA (Reuters) - Investigative fracking operations in Colombia can go ahead after a court in the Andean country's Santander province on Thursday reversed a lower court's decision to block two pilot projects.

Commercial development of non-conventional energy deposits - such as by hydraulic fracturing, or fracking for hydrocarbons - is not currently permitted in Colombia, but the country's highest administrative court has allowed pilot projects to go ahead while it considers the issue.

Majority state-owned Colombian oil company Ecopetrol and U.S. partner Exxon Mobil Corp are undertaking both pilot projects, with Ecopetrol serving as operator.

In late April, a judge in the city of Barrancabermeja suspended an environmental license for the Kale pilot project, ruling that a local Afro-Colombian group, the Afrowilches, had not been properly consulted.

That ruling ordered that a prior consultation for Afrowilches for both the Kale and Platero project areas be carried out. Colombia's National Environmental Licensing Authority (ANLA) has authorized the Kale project but not yet the Platero project.

"The ruling dated April 21, 2022 by the First Administrative Court of Barrancabermeja is hereby revoked and the request for legal protection is ruled inadmissible," the higher Administrative Court of Santander said in a statement.

The projects are located in the municipality of Puerto Wilches.

Ecopetrol was not immediately available to comment on the ruling.

The Colombia Free from Fracking Alliance said it regretted the latest decision and would appeal to a higher court.

"We'll request a review of the court's decision by the Constitutional Court, considering that (the decision) disregards the precedent of prior consultation and violates the rights of the Afro-Colombian communities of Puerto Wilches," the group said.

(Reporting by Oliver Griffin and Luis Jaime Acosta; Editing by Bradley Perrett)

Scientists Urge 'Transformative Change' to Stave Off Climate, Biodiversity Collapse

"As the window to avoid far-reaching and irreversible impacts on people and nature rapidly closes, the current actions to address these global challenges are insufficient."


A fire burns trees next to grazing land in the Amazon basin in Ze Doca, Brazil on November 22, 2014. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)


JESSICA CORBETT

June 2, 2022

Building on a landmark report from last year, 18 top scientists this week emphasized "the need for transformative change" to take on the connected biodiversity and climate crises—and that "bringing about transformative change requires transformative governance."

"We need urgent and decisive action amidst the accelerating climate and biodiversity crises."

The paper, published Wednesday in the journal BioScience, points out that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns the world could surpass the Paris agreement's 1.5°C temperature target for 2100 by the end of this decade.

The article also highlights a conclusion from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) that "reversing the processes of biodiversity decline can only be achieved through intentional and transformative changes across economic, social, political, and technological systems."

"As the window to avoid far-reaching and irreversible impacts on people and nature rapidly closes, the current actions to address these global challenges are insufficient," the article asserts.

Incremental changes, the paper states, "are unlikely to gain sufficient traction to be scaled up if they are not accompanied by broader system-wide institutional changes to create the structural conditions for such scaling up to occur," and "also risk being too slow to avoid severe negative impacts on people and nature."

"Strategies to address some of the negative trends have been proposed," the publication continues. "However, the feedback loops and interactions among biodiversity, climate, and society at multiple spatial, temporal, and organizational scales—what we label in the present article the biodiversity-climate-society (BCS) nexus—are generally ignored."

The authors previously contributed to the first joint publication of the IPCC and IPBES, which highlights that though "climate change and biodiversity loss are two of the most pressing issues of the Anthropocene" and "there is recognition in both scientific and policymaking circles that the two are interconnected, in practice they are largely addressed in their own domains."

"This functional separation creates a risk of incompletely identifying, understanding, and dealing with the connections between the two," that June 2021 report adds. "In the worst case, it may lead to taking actions that inadvertently prevent the solution of one or the other, or both issues."

The new article "is designed to contribute to the much-anticipated and long-delayed 'Paris-style agreement for nature' set to take place later this year in Kunming, China where 196 countries will aim to set ambitious goals for biodiversity," according to a Wednesday statement. "The authors hope that their calls for transformative change will help to better inform the setting of biodiversity objectives, targets, and indicators for the next decade."


The paper's lead author, Unai Pascual of the Basque Center for Climate Change, said Wednesday that "international policy initiatives such as the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change and the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity are surprisingly lagging behind the scientific evidence about the need to integrate a climate-biodiversity-society nexus perspective in their decisions."

"I hope that the efforts by the global scientific community in this regard will be followed up by action from the policymakers," he added. "We need urgent and decisive action amidst the accelerating climate and biodiversity crises."

Pascual and the other authors examined case studies on forest and marine ecosystems, urban environments, and the Arctic. In the Canadian Arctic, the paper notes, "Inuit codevelopment and comanagement are key components of recent marine conservation efforts."

"The codesign of conservation objectives by Inuit and federal parties allows for a rights-based approach to governing conservation areas that includes Inuit active participation and represents a governance approach that can provide cobenefits in terms of protecting species and ecosystems, climate change adaptation and mitigation, and sustaining Inuit livelihoods and subsistence harvesting," the document explains.

"It is unlikely that we are able to resolve the climatic, environmental, and social crises that humanity faces today using the same logic that created these challenges."

Other examples they explored include efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon, battles over formally protecting swaths of the high seas, and tree-planting schemes that are "restricted to cities with already high socioeconomic status or well-off locations" within urban areas.

"Ideally, transformative governance would catalyze and create inclusive (but sometimes intentionally disruptive) approaches for upscaling of more effective and just interventions in the BCS space," the article says. "But our examples show this is rarely achieved."

The scientists crafted five principles that "policy interventions could follow to facilitate moving from reformist (incremental and shallow) to deeper transformational governance for the BCS nexus." They are: focus on multifunctional interventions; integrate and innovate across scales; create coalitions of support; ensure equitable approaches; and build social tipping points.

The paper comes as scientists have grown increasingly outspoken about the dangerous path the planet is on, from sending impassioned letters to world leaders to joining protests—such as gluing themselves to a U.K. government building to demand an end to "fossil fuel madness."

"It is unlikely that we are able to resolve the climatic, environmental, and social crises that humanity faces today using the same logic that created these challenges," Victoria Reyes-García of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona—a co-author of both the new article and last year's joint report—warned Wednesday, echoing the paper's broad message.

"On their own, technological fixes, current governance structures, and economic incentives/disencentives will not suffice to generate the transformative change needed to ensure a future with a livable climate, a rich environment, and just societies," she said. "To achieve these goals, we need urgent changes in the way we value nature and govern the rich common heritage of the Earth."

US House Committee probing Saudi investment with Kushner's firm

House of Representatives committee investigating whether Jared Kushner improperly used government position to obtain funds from Saudis.

Israel National News
03.06.22 04:31
Saudi ArabiaHouse of RepresentativesJared Kushner

Jared KushnerWAM/TPS

A US House of Representatives committee said on Thursday that it was investigating the Saudi Arabian government's $2 billion investment with Affinity, a firm of Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of former President Donald Trump, Reuters reported.

"The Committee on Oversight and Reform is investigating whether you (Kushner) have improperly traded on your government position to obtain billions of dollars from the Saudi government and whether your personal financial interests improperly influenced US foreign policy during the administration of your father-in-law, former President Trump," Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), who leads the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, said in a letter.

"Your support for Saudi interests was unwavering, even as Congress and the rest of the world closely scrutinized the country’s human rights abuses in Yemen, the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi assassins tied to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and Saudi Arabia’s crackdown on political dissidents at home," Maloney wrote, adding that Kushner incorporated the firm after Trump left office and it secured the $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia six months later.

A spokesman for Kushner told the New York Times that he "abided by all legal and ethical guidelines both during and after his government service."

Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported that Affinity plans to invest millions of dollars of Saudi Arabia’s money in Israeli startups.

The decision marks the first known instance that the Saudi Public Investment Fund’s cash will be directed to Israel, a sign of the kingdom’s increasing willingness to do business with the country, even though they have no diplomatic relations. This could help lay the groundwork for a breakthrough normalization pact between the two countries.

Kushner, who helped broker the Abraham Accords between Israel and several Arab countries, is known for his close ties to the Saudi regime. In February, he met with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman.

Shortly after Morocco normalized ties with Israel, Kushner said he believed it was only a matter of time until Saudi Arabia normalized relations with Israel.

UCP disregarded research, court order to disclose rationale for lifting school mask mandate, union charges

The United Conservative government’s citing of cabinet confidentiality in refusing to disclose how it decided to lift a school mask mandate last winter is “thumbing its nose” at Albertans and a judge’s order, says a union leader.


© Ian Kucerak

Dr. Deena Hinshaw, Alberta's chief medical officer of health.

And the documents the government did release earlier this week show the province disregarded research supporting the merits of masking in schools to control COVID-19 infections in favour of pandering to their political base, said Alberta Federation of Labour president Gil McGowan.

“It’s clear the government is still using cabinet confidentiality as a shield to deny access to relevant documents. … Albertans deserve to know why they lifted the mask mandate in the middle of the Omicron wave,” McGowan said Thursday.

“Even the documents we have do tell us the government was more interested in catering to the anti-mask protesters than ensuring public safety.”

A ruling last month by Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Grant Dunlop concluded Dr. Deena Hinshaw, chief medical officer of health, must be more transparent in responding to demands by the Alberta Federation of Labour and five family plaintiffs for information explaining why the UCP government lifted the COVID-19 mask mandate on March 1.

Of particular interest to the court were records from a Feb. 8 cabinet meeting that dealt with the decision, which included a PowerPoint presentation conducted by Hinshaw.

But in response to why she can’t comply with the court’s order, Hinshaw signed off on a document stating it’s “subject to public interest immunity” as is a record of the cabinet meeting minutes from that meeting.

“However, Dr. Hinshaw and her staff have made best efforts to identify and provide the documents and information that were most critical and directly relevant to the decision,” states the document.

In another document, Justice Minister Tyler Shandro argues ditching cabinet confidentiality “could impede the free flow of discussion and injure the process of democratic governance.”

The disclosure also lists a litany of studies, articles and research on the value of masking, many of them indicating that face coverings have definite value in protecting the wider community and some merit within schools, though the latter isn’t as clear.

But Health Minister Jason Copping was told in a March 2 briefing note that data shows masking had made Alberta schools significantly safer, while noting their mandatory use had been discontinued over the previous two weeks.

“According to observed Alberta data, which could be influenced by factors other than masking, school boards without mask mandates at the start of the school year (September 2021) had three times more outbreaks in their schools in the first few months of the school year,” stated Susan Novak, policy and planning section chief.

“In addition, case and hospitalization rates per 100,000 population in Alberta for children five to 11 years old and adults 30 to 59 years old were lower in areas where mask mandates were required.”

The note went on to recommend that in lieu of masking, there be increases in other measures such as distancing and hygiene protocols and a continuation of symptom screening and vaccinations of eligible students and staff.

In a lengthy summary of research, Scott Fullmer, Alberta Health’s acting director of health evidence in policy, emphasized in places how face coverings were of at least some benefit.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control data, he said, “concluded the preponderance of the available evidence from U.S. schools that even when students were placed less than six feet apart, there was limited transmission when other layered prevention strategies were consistently maintained, notably masking and student cohorts.”

Another CDC study showed schools in U.S. counties without mandates saw the number of new COVID-19 infections more than double those that had imposed them.

Fullmer noted studies conducted in Utah starting last December suggested mask use in schools was a factor in reducing infection spread.

“Despite high community incidences and an inability to place classroom seats 6 ft. apart, this investigation found low (COVID-19) transmission and no school-related outbreaks in 20 Salt Lake County elementary schools with high student mask use and implementation of multiple strategies to limit transmission.”

But much of the data, he said, wasn’t able to pinpoint the precise impact of comprehensive masking policies when used with other measures like cohorts, hygiene protocols, spacing and improved ventilation.

Ontario Public Health determined use of masks in schools was associated with lower infection rates but “schools had layered prevention and control measures in place, so it was challenging to measure the independent impact of mask-wearing,” stated Fullmer.

And in some cases, such as in the United Kingdom, he said, research showed masking had little noticeable effect.

A Feb. 7 memo from Jason Kenney’s office to the premier is led off with what it calls the negative impact masks have on children and that the data on effectiveness is thin.

“There is insufficient direct evidence of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing COVID-19 transmission in education settings,” it states.

“Existing research supporting mask use in schools has limitations that make the pool of evidence weak and the benefits of masking children unclear.”

The memo cites research from countries like Spain that suggest masking had limited impact or was only effective when worn by school staff.

They go on to cite a number of jurisdictions in the U.S. and Europe that either ban mandatory face coverings in schools or don’t require them while stating children and young people are at low risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes.

But McGowan accused the government political staffers of “cherry-picking” data to suit Kenney’s political preferences and using opinion articles that don’t reflect the research.

“There’s next to nothing in these documents supporting lifting the mandate. … It’s pretty clear it made sense to maintain them,” he said.

McGowan said his group of plaintiffs, which includes families with immunocompromised children, has a week to file an application asking Dunlop to strip cabinet confidence in this case, and is considering it.

The overall case is scheduled to be heard again in Court of Queen’s Bench on Aug. 15.

Officials with Alberta Health didn’t respond to a request for comment.

BKaufmann@postmedia.com
Twitter: @BillKaufmannjrn

ONTARIO ELECTION 2022

Ontario's NDP leader Andrea Horwath wins her seat but resigns as leader

Adrian Humphreys

POSTMEDIA

© Provided by National PostOntario New Democratic Party leader Andrea Horwath at a campaign stop in Kingston, Ont. on Tuesday, May 31, 2022.


HAMILTON — Ontario New Democratic Party leader Andrea Horwath announced she was stepping down as party leader after she failed to form a government despite four elections of rebuilding.

“We didn’t get there this time,” she told an election night crowd of supporters in her home riding in downtown Hamilton.

“Tonight, it is time to pass the torch, to pass the baton, to hand off leadership of the NDP,” she said. “It makes me so happy,” she said despite her obvious tears, “because our team is so strong right now.”

Horwath praised her candidates, her campaign team and Ontario voters, to cheers and sign waving supporters.

She said the NDP showed the province “a new way forward,” and warned that Doug Ford, despite his majority, did not muster a majority of the electorate’s votes.

“We will never stop fighting,” she said. “People are counting on us to be on their side.”

She said Ontario as a whole did not vote for Ford’s stance on health care, climate change, senior care, wages, and other issues.

“They did not vote for big highways to big houses that no one can afford,” she said.

The announcement was widely expected. Within an hour of the early results, proverbial sharks were circling.

NDP MPP Joel Harden, re-elected in Ottawa Centre, told supporters: “I think it is time for change, not only at the head of our party, but in our policies as well.”

Before Horwath’s announcement, Janelle Brady, president of the Ontario NDP brushed aside the call for change, saying she admits she is “a bit disappointed” with the Progressive Conservative’s Doug Ford forming another majority government, but remained proud the NDP remained as official opposition and with Horwath’s performance.

“I couldn’t be more proud of Andrea Horwath,” Brady said.

She said the results should be troubling to the Liberal party not for the NDP. A lot of Liberal supporters switched to the NDP while a lot of right-wing Liberals switch to the PCs, leaving the NDP with room to grow.

“We are a viable option,” she said, and the NDP will “hold Doug Ford and the PCs to account… The NDP is absolutely here to stay.”

The event was billed as the “NDP Election Night Victory Party” but as supporters trickled in, there was little excitement as Ford showed an early strong lead. A restrained applause came when a TV network predicted the NDP would again form the official opposition at Queen’s Park.

But excitement and noise picked up when Horwath arrived at the large auditorium in the Hamilton Convention Centre Thursday night, a facility they shared with a high school prom. Supporters clearly love her.

Horwath, 59, was leader of the Official Opposition when the election was called. She was expected to easily win her riding of Hamilton Centre. Early poll results showed her running away with it.

Doug Ford's PC's roar to a majority win in Ontario
Riding-by-riding Ontario election results

NDP officials pointed to her time spent campaigning in Progressive Conservative ridings as a sign of her ambition and eye to party growth.

During her time, the party came back from not having party status to again be a political competitor. But pressure was on her to perform far better.

Peter Graefe, a professor political science at Hamilton’s McMaster University, said the status quo was not enough to keep her in her job.

“There was a faction in the party who wanted to bring in a new face after becoming the official opposition to refresh the party. I think the general view probably within the NDP was let her have that last shot — can she now go one step further and become premier,” Graefe said.

“If that doesn’t come off then I think all parties, including Andrea Horwath, are aware that the expectation is that she go, and the question is whether it is sooner or later.

“The political realist’s view is: time’s up and it’s probably better to go on your own accord rather than being forced out at a convention.”

When the word “ready” is the first word in the slogan on Horwath’s campaign bus after 13 years as leader, it may have signalled something the campaign hadn’t imagined.

Horwath began the day in Hamilton with a photo opportunity, casting her vote in the city where she was born and raised, wearing a blue denim jean jacket, T-shirt and running shoes, highlighting her blue-collar roots.

She has led the Ontario NDP since 2009, when she became the first woman to lead an Ontario party and led the party through four elections. After she won, a colleague apparently quipped to her that she just accepted “the worst job in Ontario.”

But she started in provincial politics as an invigorating winner.

She trounced a Liberal in a Liberal riding in a by-election in 2004, pushing the NDP past the threshold for official party status. She was re-elected in 2007 general election and handily won the leadership of her party two years later.

In the 2014 election the party’s seat count remained the same but in 2018 they had a breakthrough. The NDP nearly doubled its seat count, to 40 seats, when support for the Liberals collapsed, and Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives seized a majority.

There was one hurdle left for her as leader: to form a government.

Facing a still-wounded Liberal party with a little-known leader, a controversial premier despised in some quarters, and amid a pandemic that rest the civic agenda with a renewed focus on work and healthcare, this election was seen as her best chance. And perhaps her last chance.

Polls, however, soon suggested voters weren’t embracing that plan.

Both the NDP and Liberals were campaigning for second place for much of the campaign.

Graefe said Horwath’s legacy as a leader is uncertain.

“I suspect the general consensus will be that she served a long period of time in what is probably a pretty thankless job. She was a leader who was kind of reactive. It is kind of hard to see what the underlying philosophy was that she brought to her role other than to try to win.”

Horwath said nothing about her future other than it wasn’t as NDP leader.

With her political career having begun with a three-term stint on Hamilton city council, there is already calls for her to run to be the city’s mayor.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | Twitter: AD_Humphreys

Leader Del Duca steps down as Ontario Liberals have disappointing election night

Earlier this week, Del Duca pledged to stay on as leader regardless of the election outcome

Author of the article: Ryan Tumilty
Publishing date:Jun 02, 2022 • 

Ontario Liberal Party Leader Steven Del Duca arrives for his election night event in Vaughan, June 2, 2022. 

PHOTO BY CHRIS YOUNG/THE CANADIAN PRESS
Article content

OTTAWA – Ontario Liberals Steven Del Duca stepped down Thursday, after failing to win his own seat, official party status or a significantly bigger place for his party in the provincial legislature.

As of 10:45 p.m., the Liberals were leading or elected in eight seats, up from the seven they had in the legislature at dissolution, but Del Duca’s riding of Vaughan-Woodbridge was not among them.

Del Duca said he was proud of the effort the party made, but it was not enough.

“I have no doubt that the women and men that Ontario Liberals have elected to the legislature will do their part, in fact will do more than their part to help grow a new, and energetic progressive movement in Ontario,” he said to a room full of supporters. “It will, however, be a movement that will be led by a new leader.

He said the party would be out of debt later this year, and he was confident it would be in a better position to fight a future campaign, but said it would do so with a new leader at the helm.

“I know that we as a political family and we as a political movement will be starting the next campaign from a much better place,” Del Duca.

Earlier this week, he pledged to stay on as leader regardless of the outcome, but the party’s result was well below even the worst estimates of most pollsters, who forecast the Liberals would have at least enough seats to regain party status.

The Liberals lost the eastern Ontario riding of Glengarry – Prescott – Russell, which had been held by floor crosser Amanda Simard and Thunder Bay – Superior North. They were offsetting those losses with possible wins in Kingston, Toronto and Barrie.

The lack of official party status will be a major setback for the Liberals, parties need at least 12 seats to garner that status, and it comes with more funding, more questions during Question Period and more staff to help make a party’s presence felt.
Del Duca was a minister in former premier Kathleen Wynne’s government and won the party’s 2020 leadership contest with a comfortable margin over several of his former cabinet colleagues.

The 2018 election was a disaster for Wynne as the party plummeted in support, losing 48 seats and falling from government to the third party in the legislature. With just seven seats, the party didn’t even hold official party status in the legislature.

Ashley Csanady, a senior consultant with McMillan Vantage Policy Group and former staffer for Wynne, said after 2018 the party was left in a big hole and tonight was the beginning of a climb.

“They did a good job, seizing momentum, running a professional campaign that behooves the brand of the Liberal Party, really on a shoestring compared to resources we’ve had in the past,” she said.

Under Doug Ford, the Progressive Conservatives attracted more working class votes than they have previously, even getting the endorsement of major private sector unions. Csanady said if the Liberals want to return to power, they will have to figure out if that’s a temporary move or a permanent shift.

“Is this a Doug Ford phenomenon or have we forever seen the kind of blue collar vote, especially those unions, private sector unions falling into the Tory camp,” she said.

The PC’s had a 42-year hold on power between 1943 and 1985, including 14 years under former premier Bill Davis. Csanady said that version of the party was moderate and welcoming and Ford’s government share’s some similarities.

“If you go back to the Bill Davis years, the PC party was a moderate party with a big tent. And, and the one thing love him or hate him you can say about Doug Ford is he’s not a rabid partisan.”

EVER OPTIMISTIC RIGHT WING

Ben Woodfinden: Doug Ford's blue collar election victory could reshape conservatism

With second majority, PCs should focus on resisting woke dogmas, as well as on economic issues

Author of the article :Ben Woodfinden, Special to National Post
Publishing date: Jun 02, 2022 • 

Supporters of Ontario PC Party Leader Doug Ford cheer as early results trickle in for the Ontario provincial election, in Toronto, Thursday, June 2, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette

Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservative Party has cruised to re-election in Ontario with a majority. Most observers agree that it has been a lacklustre campaign with little drama or serious competition for government. But that doesn’t mean the election was entirely devoid of interesting narratives. Throughout the election, the most intriguing development was the wave of union endorsements the PCs managed to gain from an array of private sector unions. These endorsements signal a real shift and political realignment in the province that has implications for conservatives beyond Ontario.


Ford was re-elected on a pledge to “get it done” that is heavy on building and infrastructure promises. This is a crucial part of what Ford’s PCs must do. But they should also be more ambitious with this second majority, and develop a blue collar conservative agenda that makes these voters a permanent part of the Conservative coalition, and can do so without falling pray to the darker and more destructive forms of populism that has accompanied these political shifts elsewhere in recent years.


Beyond Ford, the real MVP and architect of this electoral breakthrough is Labour Minister Monte McNaughton, who personally attracted the endorsement of Patrick Dillon, a major figure in the Working Families Coalition that was a thorn in the side of the PCs for much of the past two decades. Part of McNaughton’s efforts to build relationships with trade unions is driven by practical necessity. If the PCs are going to build the highways, houses, and infrastructure they say they are, demand for skilled trades workers is going to be high and as the skilled trade labour force ages, shortages will grow. If Ontario is going to “get it done,” it’s going to need more people entering the trades.

However, this is about more than just labour market demands. Explaining his intentions recently, McNaughton said that “We worked closely to find common ground and we’re getting endorsed by these blue collar unions because we’re ensuring that people have good jobs with pensions and benefits.” McNaughton has shown that policies that benefit workers need not come from the left. In government, he brought in initiatives like a right to “switch off” and expanded skilled trades education and support.


The PCs should interpret this election result as an endorsement to go further down this road and think bigger about what a blue collar conservatism could be. A focus on work is nothing new for conservatives. The opportunities here are in tying work towards a bigger agenda and vision. Good jobs aren’t just ones that help people pay the bills, they are ones that help people build lives and support families. Objectives and targeted public policy outcomes in areas like education and childcare policies, or broader economic growth objectives, should not just be growth for the sake of growth or labour force participation. They should be explicitly done with the goal of creating good jobs that can support and enable Ontarians to start families.

Riding-by-riding Ontario election results

HERE WE GO WITH THE LEFT WING IS OUTTA TOUCH WITH IT'S BASE EXCEPT AS THESE FOLKS WILL TELL YOU THE BASE IS PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS AND UNIFOR NOT THE BUILDING TRADES

This shift reflects deeper social and political changes that are going on. In a column for the Hub about the changes happening on the other side of the spectrum, Sean Speer highlighted how “progressive parties have mostly abandoned blue-collar voters in favour of the types of ideological issues and ideas that animate their left-wing bases.” These “woke” issues and ideas have disconnected working class and blue collar Canadians from their traditional home on the left and created this opportunity the PCs have taken advantage of.

When asked during the election about this progressive shift, McNaughton said that “they’re more concerned about statues than they are about good jobs with pensions and benefits.” This is well put, but the PCs shouldn’t learn the wrong lesson here and think the left’s focus on a melange of social and cultural issues means the right should focus solely on economic concerns.

The Conservatives should instead see this second majority as a mandate to stand their ground on culture and values that are still the mainstream of Canadian society. Things like sensible patriotism, public education that doesn’t sneak the latest cultural fashion and orthodoxies emanating from academia, and common sense law and order policies that keep Ontarians safe. Progressive dogmas that are overrepresented in elite discourse should be resisted. A blue collar conservatism would not be culturally radical, it would be culturally moderate, and push back against the wild and out of sync ideas emanating from left-wing institutions.

Doug Ford’s first mandate was dominated by the pandemic, which understandably became the focus and dampened the possibilities of serious conservative ideas or reforms. The PCs should see the next four years as a real opportunity to craft an ambitious new blue collar conservatism that can secure their new labour oriented coalition in the future, a coalition that could also be a model for other conservative parties and governments in North America.

National Post