It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Monday, February 27, 2023
How the close dinosaurian relatives of birds evolved gigantic and miniature sizes
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (AAAS)
An analysis of fossils of non-avialan theropod dinosaurs – a dinosaur clade that includes an array of body sizes – has provided findings that run contrary to expectations regarding the factors that inform the evolution of body size diversity. “Once quantified and analyzed in a phylogenetic framework [like this], we predict that diverse growth strategies will be recognized in other clades,” say the study’s authors. Over evolutionary history, many taxa have evolved very large and very small body sizes, and even closely related species can exhibit widely disparate sizes. The predominant mechanisms underlying the evolution of gigantism and miniaturization is widely considered to be changes to growth rate rather than duration of growth during development. However, despite this assumption, very few studies have explored the evolution of developmental rate and duration across many species within a comparative phylogenetic framework. This is partly because there are few abundantly sampled, long-lived clades containing a diversity of body sizes with which to evaluate these questions. Michael D’Emic and colleagues performed a large-scale phylogenetic comparative analysis examining the developmental strategies underlying the evolution of body size in non-avialan theropod dinosaurs, which can range from tiny (<.5 meters in length) to gigantic (>12 meters in length) in size. Using fossil measurements from 42 non-avialan species, including annually deposited cortical growth marks, D’Emic et al. compiled a comprehensive histological dataset of body size and growth rate. The findings show that, contrary to expectations, changes in growth rate and duration played nearly equal roles in the evolution of body size diversity in non-avialan theropods.
IMAGE: THIS COMPARISON BETWEEN THEROPOD ARMS AND BIRD WINGS SHOWS HOW RESEARCHERS THINK THE PROPATAGIUM ALLOWED FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF MOVEMENT AS THE FORMER EVOLVED OVER MILLIONS OF YEARS INTO THE LATTER.view more
Modern birds capable of flight all have a specialized wing structure called the propatagium without which they could not fly. The evolutionary origin of this structure has remained a mystery, but new research suggests it evolved in nonavian dinosaurs. The finding comes from statistical analyses of arm joints preserved in fossils and helps fill some gaps in knowledge about the origin of bird flight.
For a long time now, we have known modern birds evolved from certain lineages of dinosaurs that lived millions of years ago. This has led researchers to look to dinosaurs to explain some of the features unique to birds, for example, feathers, bone structure and so on. But there’s something special about the wings of birds in particular that piqued the interest of researchers at the University of Tokyo’s Department of Earth and Planetary Science.
“At the leading edge of a bird’s wing is a structure called the propatagium, which contains a muscle connecting the shoulder and wrist that helps the wing flapping and makes bird flight possible,” said Associate Professor Tatsuya Hirasawa. “It’s not found in other vertebrates, and it’s also found to have disappeared or lost its function in flightless birds, one of the reasons we know it’s essential for flight. So, in order to understand how flight evolved in birds, we must know how the propatagium evolved. This is what prompted us to explore some distant ancestors of modern birds, theropod dinosaurs.”
Theropod dinosaurs, such as Tyrannosaurus rex and Velociraptor, had arms not wings. If the scientists could find evidence of an early example of the propatagium in these dinosaurs, it would help explain how the modern avian branch of the tree of life transitioned from arms to wings. However, it’s not so simple, as the propatagium is made up of soft tissues which do not fossilize well, if at all, so direct evidence might not be possible to find. Instead, the researchers had to find an indirect way to identify the presence or lack of a propatagium in a specimen.
“The solution we came up with to assess the presence of a propatagium was to collect data about the angles of joints along the arm, or wing, of a dinosaur or bird,” said Yurika Uno, a graduate student at Hirasawa's lab. “In modern birds, the wings cannot fully extend due to the propatagium, constraining the range of angles possible between connecting sections. If we could find a similarly specific set of angles between joints in dinosaur specimens, we can be fairly sure they too possessed a propatagium. And through quantitative analyses of the fossilized postures of birds and nondinosaurs, we found the telltale ranges of joint angles we hoped to.”
Based on this clue, the team found that the propatagium likely evolved in a group of dinosaurs known as the maniraptoran theropods, including the famous Velociraptor. This was backed up when the researchers identified the propatagium in preserved soft tissue fossils, including those of the feathered oviraptorosaurian Caudipteryx and winged dromaeosaurian Microraptor. All the specimens they found it in existed prior to the evolution of flight in that lineage.
This research means it’s now known when the propatagium came into being, and it leads researchers on to the next question of how it came to be. Why these particular theropod species needed such a structure to better adapt to their environment might be a harder question to answer. The team has already begun exploring possible connections between the fossil evidence and embryonic development of modern vertebrates to see if that will shed any light on it. The team also thinks some theropods might have evolved the propatagium not because of any pressure to learn to fly, as their forelimbs were made for grasping objects and not for flying.
“Dinosaurs portrayed in popular media are becoming more and more accurate,” said Hirasawa. “At least now we get to see features like feathers, but I hope we can see an even more up-to-date representation soon where theropods have their propatagium too.”
###
Journal article: Yurika Uno and Tatsuya Hirasawa. “Origin of the propatagium in non-avian dinosaurs”, Zoological Letters. DOI
Funding: This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grant nos. 17H06385 and 19K04061.
Useful links: Department of Earth and Planetary Science - https://www.eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/
About The University of Tokyo The University of Tokyo is Japan's leading university and one of the world's top research universities. The vast research output of some 6,000 researchers is published in the world's top journals across the arts and sciences. Our vibrant student body of around 15,000 undergraduate and 15,000 graduate students includes over 4,000 international students. Find out more at www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/ or follow us on Twitter at @UTokyo_News_en.
Although soft tissue such as that found in the propatagium don’t fossilize well, there are some exceedingly rare, well-preserved examples such as these. The propatagium is labeled ppt in image D.
A more accurate version of a typical maniraptoran dinosaur, a common species to feature in popular media.
A branch of the tree of life that includes the time when the propatagium, vital to flight in future birds, came about.
The way arm joints are articulated in fossils gives away the presence or absence of the propatagium.
The way arm joints are articulated in fossils gives away the presence or absence of the propatagium.
No comments:
Post a Comment