More is not always better

Gauging user benefits of multi-homing in platform economics

Peer-Reviewed Publication

KYOTO UNIVERSITY

 

IMAGE: 

MULTI-HOMING VERSUS SINGLE-HOMING

view more 

CREDIT: KYOTOU/TRAIS

Kyoto, Japan -- As with the business of logistics, where having multiple routes to deliver goods to the same destination raises reliability, network-dependent consumerism depends on multiple networks having a host computer with multiple connections operating in sync. 

With digital platforms for business becoming the norm, industry experience reminds us of the risks when relying on a single network and concentrating on only a few operators.  

A research group including Kyoto University studied the relationship between single-homing consumers -- who use only one particular platform -- and multi-homing consumers. The team presented a new framework demonstrating whether proportionately more multi-homing consumers lead to significant efficiency gains when integrating two business platforms.

"Our study is related to the economics of imperfect competition, a field covering various market-related issues that has become increasingly important as information and communication technology advances," says first author Takanori Adachi of KyotoU's Graduate School of Management and Graduate School of Economics. 

The platform used in a single-homing situation naturally takes on a dominant role for consumers. However, there is a growing tendency to focus on the multi-homing's need for policy guidance when considering the nature of digital regulation and policy because, proportionately, more consumers use multiple platforms. 

"In addition, an increase in the degree of multi-homing needs a more considerable reduction in the cost for allowing a business consolidation. It also creates higher barriers to entry for new platform firms," explains Mark Trembley of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. 

"We must note, therefore, under multi-homing situations, competition authorities may need to be more cautious about potential harms of platform mergers and entry barriers," adds Susumu Sato of Hitotsubashi University. 

Researchers must often make do with scant data availability on platform businesses. 

"We were delighted that our deductive arguments based on economic theory models and public databases, such as the one used in this study, effectively provided us a clearer picture of how platform economics performs in the real world," says Adachi.

###

The paper "Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Mergers and Free Entry" appeared on 9 October 2023 in The Journal of Industrial Economics, with doi: 10.1111/joie.12345

About Kyoto University

Kyoto University is one of Japan and Asia's premier research institutions, founded in 1897 and responsible for producing numerous Nobel laureates and winners of other prestigious international prizes. A broad curriculum across the arts and sciences at undergraduate and graduate levels complements several research centers, facilities, and offices around Japan and the world. For more information, please see: http://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en

---

JOURNAL

Journal of Industrial Economics

DOI

10.1111/joie.12345 

METHOD OF RESEARCH

Data/statistical analysis

SUBJECT OF RESEARCH

Not applicable

ARTICLE TITLE

Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Mergers and Free Entry