According to a recent report, 85 percent of respondents would not use a digital Canadian dollar.
Ori Freiman
December 12, 2023
Privacy must be a fundamental feature of digital currency, the author argues.
(Photo illustration by Lorenzo Di Cola/NurPhoto via REUTERS)
In June, the Bank of Canada (BoC) concluded six weeks of online public consultations about issuing a digital Canadian dollar, an idea that has gained increasing prominence along with the rise of cryptocurrencies. Last Wednesday, the results of those consultations were published, along with the central bank’s report on the matter, and they are pretty revealing.
Almost 90,000 Canadians participated in the online survey. While keeping in mind that participation is not representative of the Canadian population and that nearly all who answered had heard about the idea of a digital Canadian dollar, the results were clear: privacy matters, and there is a major distrust of institutions with respect to how they handle private data.
According to the report, 85 percent of respondents would not use a digital Canadian dollar. Not surprisingly, most people ranked the ability to make private transactions as the most important potential feature of such a currency.
The report also found:86 percent of respondents do not trust technology companies to access and protect personal payment data responsibly and lawfully;
86 percent mistrust the Government of Canada to handle their data; and
72 percent mistrust financial institutions.
Considering that these institutions already handle our data, these findings signal that there’s plenty of work ahead for regulators and everyone in the financial ecosystem. Trust is key to a thriving economy, and this pronounced lack of trust hinders opportunities and limits the potential for fintech-related innovations.
When it comes to the potential issuer of the digital Canadian dollar, 79 percent of people distrust the BoC’s ability to safeguard their sensitive financial information. Assuming the BoC is a digital fortress, it must act to improve public trust in its ability to protect personal data.
Another point to consider is that 78 percent of respondents do not believe the BoC will consider their feedback as it builds the capacity to issue a digital dollar. This is ironic because the whole point of conducting a consultation is to gather feedback and insights from the public, and yet respondents feel their opinions will not be considered. The central bank needs to engage meaningfully with the public to build trust in its decision-making processes, too.
This sentiment is not exclusive to Canada. Currently, more than 130 central banks are exploring and experimenting with the idea of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). A CBDC for retail and public usage promises an innovative payment option, an alternative to other digital currencies, and a safer society through its ability to track the movement of funds involved in money laundering, terrorism and crime. However, despite the positive promises, CBDCs pose serious concerns.
The concerns range from cybersecuring CBDC infrastructure, through economic scenarios leading to financial and monetary instability, to dystopian scenarios for democracy. The latter concerns have given CBDCs a negative reputation worldwide, and with some justification.
The ability of future governments to access, surveil and control private financial data, and program digital money to have restrictions, could lead to monitoring citizens’ transactions, limiting freedoms, and identifying political dissidents and acting against them. In fact, Canada often serves as an example among opponents elsewhere: during the truckers’ protests in Ottawa, even a democratic and liberal government was not afraid to use financial instruments against those involved. How easy would that be with a CBDC?
A digital Canadian dollar has plenty of positive potential. It would serve as a novel payment option offered by the BoC for the public — in addition to cash. In an economy with a growing number of digital transactions and electronic means of payment, the argument goes, this new form of currency could better suit the needs of Canadians.
But a digital currency is doomed to fail without the public’s trust.
If the BoC goes forward, it must convincingly address these concerns, involve the public and civil liberty organizations, make privacy a fundamental feature of the digital currency and convince Canadians that a digital dollar would benefit the public.
These processes take time. Unlike the fast-paced, much-hyped, rapid and viral adoption of technological innovations, when it comes to the national currency, being cautious and careful is necessary to safeguard financial stability and democracy.
This article first appeared in The Globe and Mail.
The opinions expressed in this article/multimedia are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of CIGI or its Board of Directors.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ori Freiman
Ori Freiman is a post-doctoral fellow both at McMaster University’s Digital Society Lab and with the Digital Policy Hub at the Centre for International Governance Innovation. His research focuses on building trust in central bank digital currencies.
In June, the Bank of Canada (BoC) concluded six weeks of online public consultations about issuing a digital Canadian dollar, an idea that has gained increasing prominence along with the rise of cryptocurrencies. Last Wednesday, the results of those consultations were published, along with the central bank’s report on the matter, and they are pretty revealing.
Almost 90,000 Canadians participated in the online survey. While keeping in mind that participation is not representative of the Canadian population and that nearly all who answered had heard about the idea of a digital Canadian dollar, the results were clear: privacy matters, and there is a major distrust of institutions with respect to how they handle private data.
According to the report, 85 percent of respondents would not use a digital Canadian dollar. Not surprisingly, most people ranked the ability to make private transactions as the most important potential feature of such a currency.
The report also found:86 percent of respondents do not trust technology companies to access and protect personal payment data responsibly and lawfully;
86 percent mistrust the Government of Canada to handle their data; and
72 percent mistrust financial institutions.
Considering that these institutions already handle our data, these findings signal that there’s plenty of work ahead for regulators and everyone in the financial ecosystem. Trust is key to a thriving economy, and this pronounced lack of trust hinders opportunities and limits the potential for fintech-related innovations.
When it comes to the potential issuer of the digital Canadian dollar, 79 percent of people distrust the BoC’s ability to safeguard their sensitive financial information. Assuming the BoC is a digital fortress, it must act to improve public trust in its ability to protect personal data.
Another point to consider is that 78 percent of respondents do not believe the BoC will consider their feedback as it builds the capacity to issue a digital dollar. This is ironic because the whole point of conducting a consultation is to gather feedback and insights from the public, and yet respondents feel their opinions will not be considered. The central bank needs to engage meaningfully with the public to build trust in its decision-making processes, too.
This sentiment is not exclusive to Canada. Currently, more than 130 central banks are exploring and experimenting with the idea of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). A CBDC for retail and public usage promises an innovative payment option, an alternative to other digital currencies, and a safer society through its ability to track the movement of funds involved in money laundering, terrorism and crime. However, despite the positive promises, CBDCs pose serious concerns.
The concerns range from cybersecuring CBDC infrastructure, through economic scenarios leading to financial and monetary instability, to dystopian scenarios for democracy. The latter concerns have given CBDCs a negative reputation worldwide, and with some justification.
The ability of future governments to access, surveil and control private financial data, and program digital money to have restrictions, could lead to monitoring citizens’ transactions, limiting freedoms, and identifying political dissidents and acting against them. In fact, Canada often serves as an example among opponents elsewhere: during the truckers’ protests in Ottawa, even a democratic and liberal government was not afraid to use financial instruments against those involved. How easy would that be with a CBDC?
A digital Canadian dollar has plenty of positive potential. It would serve as a novel payment option offered by the BoC for the public — in addition to cash. In an economy with a growing number of digital transactions and electronic means of payment, the argument goes, this new form of currency could better suit the needs of Canadians.
But a digital currency is doomed to fail without the public’s trust.
If the BoC goes forward, it must convincingly address these concerns, involve the public and civil liberty organizations, make privacy a fundamental feature of the digital currency and convince Canadians that a digital dollar would benefit the public.
These processes take time. Unlike the fast-paced, much-hyped, rapid and viral adoption of technological innovations, when it comes to the national currency, being cautious and careful is necessary to safeguard financial stability and democracy.
This article first appeared in The Globe and Mail.
The opinions expressed in this article/multimedia are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of CIGI or its Board of Directors.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ori Freiman
Ori Freiman is a post-doctoral fellow both at McMaster University’s Digital Society Lab and with the Digital Policy Hub at the Centre for International Governance Innovation. His research focuses on building trust in central bank digital currencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment