Study takes wider view at household size, children’s development
IMAGE:
DR. MANDY MAGUIRE (LEFT) AND DR. JACKIE NELSON STUDIED THE IMPACT OF THE ADULT-TO-CHILD RATIO WITHIN A HOUSEHOLD, AS WELL AS THE NUMBER OF TOTAL OCCUPANTS, ON CHILDREN’S LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT. THEIR STUDY FOUND THAT HAVING MORE ADULTS IN A HOUSEHOLD IS BENEFICIAL, BUT EXACTLY WHY AND UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS REQUIRES FURTHER EXPLORATION, MAGUIRE SAID.
view moreCREDIT: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS PHOTO
Researchers from The University of Texas at Dallas’ School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) are taking a more detailed look at how children’s language development is influenced by the number of people in their households.
Associate professors Dr. Mandy Maguire, director of the Center for Children and Families (CCF), and Dr. Jackie Nelson and their colleagues evaluated the impact of the adult-to-child ratio within each residence, as well as the number of total occupants, on children’s language development in a study published online Oct. 30 in Developmental Psychology.
American demographics have shifted significantly in the last 40 years, with many more children living in homes with extended families. Greater household density — the ratio of people to bedrooms in a home — has been shown to have a negative effect on children’s language development. These conclusions are based on households with no more than two adults.
Maguire, senior author of the study and associate professor of speech, language, and hearing as well as an affiliate member of the Callier Center for Communication Disorders, and her colleagues wondered whether additional adults in the household led to a positive influence on language acquisition.
“In many cultures, having grandparents in the home to support a child’s development is the norm,” Maguire said. “Variations in household makeup are much more common today due to both race and ethnicity considerations as well as socioeconomic status.”
The new study found that having more adults in the household is beneficial, but exactly why and under what conditions requires further exploration, Maguire said.
“This study was a jumping-off point for asking these additional questions,” she said. “Family dynamics are very complex, and that’s reflected in the variability in this first study.”
The study involved 275 children ages 8 to 15. The research team quantified relationships between household density and adult-to-child ratio with children’s vocabulary scores, as well as maternal education level and a subjective measure of household chaos.
They confirmed that higher household density related to lower vocabulary scores, but they also determined that a higher adult-to-child ratio correlated to higher child vocabulary scores and to lower household chaos scores. This pattern was particularly apparent in Hispanic families, which made up about half of the sample.
“We saw a marginally positive association between adult-to-child ratio and child vocabulary across the whole sample,” said Nelson, who is also affiliated with CCF. “However, when we examine this by ethnic group, we see a strong positive effect among Hispanic families.”
Nelson explained that household chaos — subjectively reported by household caregivers — is a valuable measure of people’s perceptions of their environment and their own stress levels.
“The same environment might be chaotic to me and not chaotic to you,” she said. “Gathering this information via people’s own perceptions — rather than an outsider’s objective rating — can be more culturally sensitive, because people from different cultures may be more comfortable with different noise levels in the home.”
Maguire emphasized the ways in which this study attempts to propel the field beyond demographic uniformity.
“Developmental psychology has traditionally studied upper-middle-class white families, which tend to be the average two adults and two kids,” she said. “Household number is very directly simplified to the number of children in those homes. An understanding of other cultures and other household scenarios has been lacking.”
Maguire said that the role of grandparents in a household is important to examine further as well.
“In some cases, the grandparent could be another dependent who is taking resources away. In others, the grandparent may be contributing to child care and education — perhaps even providing the majority of care, if both parents work,” she said. “You might see very different outcomes from those two situations. So, we need to understand: Who is in the home and why? Do they alleviate chaos or take away attention from the children? What socioeconomic aspects are involved?”
Overall, the researchers believe household size as a negative predictor of language development in children needs to be reconsidered.
“The number of multigenerational households has quadrupled in the last 20 years,” Maguire said. “The environment of an American child has evolved, opening up a huge floodgate of the research we need to be doing. We’ve overlooked a really important, dynamic component of family life.”
Sonali Poudel MS’20, PhD’21, now a research scientist at UT Austin, was corresponding author of the paper. Additional UT Dallas contributors included Mohammad Hossein Behboudi, applied cognition and neuroscience graduate student; Kathleen Denicola-Prechtl MS’14, speech, language, and hearing sciences doctoral student; Stephanie Castro BS’21, former manager of Maguire’s lab who is now a PhD student at UT Austin; and former UTD researcher Dr. Carlos Benitez-Barrera, now an assistant professor of communication sciences and disorders at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The work was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (1551770).
JOURNAL
Developmental Psychology
ARTICLE TITLE
Rethinking household size and children’s language environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment