SPACE
Robert Lea
Wed, April 17, 2024
An illustration of a brown dwarf with a ring of reddish auroral emissions at its north pole.
Using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), astronomers have made the surprising discovery of methane emissions coming from a brown dwarf, or "failed star."
The find suggests that the brown dwarf features aurorae, and might even be orbited by an undiscovered exomoon, researchers said.
The JWST brown dwarf discovery is surprising, because these cold and isolated worlds are not expected to be warm enough for methane to emit infrared light.
The findings came about as a result of a JWST program to investigate 12 brown dwarfs. They suggest that these failed stars can generate aurorae similar to Earth's northern lights and southern lights, as well as those seen over Jupiter and Saturn. The lack of a star near this lonely brown dwarf may mean that the polar lights over it are being generated by a hidden active moon.
Related: James Webb Space Telescope spots hint of mysterious aurora over 'failed star'
The study team investigated the cold brown dwarf CWISEP J193518.59–154620.3 (W1935), located 47 light-years from Earth. While the mass of W1935 is poorly constrained, ranging from 6 to 35 times that of Jupiter, it is known to have a surface temperature of around 400 degrees Fahrenheit (204 degrees Celsius). That is around the temperature at which you'd bake chocolate chip cookies (failed brownies?).
"Methane gas is expected in giant planets and brown dwarfs, but we usually see it absorbing light, not glowing," Jackie Faherty, team leader and senior education manager at the American Museum of Natural History, said in a statement. "We were confused about what we were seeing at first, but ultimately, that transformed into pure excitement at the discovery."
Why do some stars fail?
Brown dwarfs get their unfortunate nickname "failed stars" because, despite forming directly from a collapsing cloud of gas and dust like a star, they don't have enough mass to trigger the nuclear fusion of hydrogen to helium at their cores.
This is the process that defines what a main-sequence star is, so brown dwarfs — which have masses greater than the largest planets but smaller than the smallest star — technically "fail" to reach this status.
Faherty and colleagues were looking at several brown dwarfs with JWST when they noticed that W1935 was similar, but with one intriguing difference: It is emitting methane, something never seen around a failed star before.
Modeling W1935 revealed this particular brown dwarf also has a so-called "temperature inversion." That's a phenomenon in which the atmosphere of a planet gets colder at deeper levels. This is something usually seen in planets orbiting stars that heat their atmospheres from the top down, but it wasn't expected for W1935 because the brown dwarf is isolated, and there is no external heat source.
"We were pleasantly shocked when the model clearly predicted a temperature inversion," team member and University of Hertfordshire scientist Ben Burningham said in the statement. "But we also had to figure out where that extra upper atmosphere heat was coming from."
an image of jupiter, showing the planet's colorful bands
To solve this mystery, the team looked closer to home at the solar system's gas giants, Jupiter and Saturn. Both of these gas giants have methane emissions, and both have atmospheres that demonstrate temperature inversion.
For Jupiter and Saturn, the cause of methane emissions and temperature inversion is aurorae, leading Faherty and the team to conclude this is what the JWST had detected around W1935. The big question is, what is driving the aurora at W1935?
This is an issue, because solar wind — the stream of charged particles from the sun — is the major driver of aurorae for Jupiter, Saturn and Earth. These charged strike the planets' magnetic fields and travel down field lines, interacting with particles in the atmosphere. This heats the upper layers of the atmosphere and causes the emission of light near the planet's poles. With no host star to blast W1935 with stellar winds, however, this process can't be the major driver of the lonely brown dwarf's aurora.
However, the aurora of Jupiter and Saturn have a secondary minor driver, in the form of charged particles streaming into the gas giants as a result of their active moons spewing material into space. For instance, Jupiter's moon Io is the most volcanic body in the solar system, spewing lava dozens of miles into space, while the Saturn moon Enceladus spits geysers into space that contain water vapor and other material that simultaneously freezes and boils when it hits space.
Thus, the aurora of W1935 with no star or stellar winds indicates that the brown dwarf might be orbited by an active moon.
Related: Are they exomoons or not? Scientists debate existence of 1st moons seen beyond our solar system
More evidence will be needed before scientists can confirm the existence of a brown dwarf moon for the first time. Until then, these initial indications offer an insight into just how influential the JWST has been since it started sending its observations of the universe back to Earth in the summer of 2022.
"Every time an astronomer points JWST at an object, there’s a chance of a new mind-blowing discovery," Faherty concluded. "Methane emission was not on my radar when we started this project, but now that we know it can be there and the explanation for it so enticing, I am constantly on the lookout for it. That’s part of how science moves forward."
The team's research was published today (April 17) in the journal Nature.
Plasma Physicist Warns That Elon Musk's Disposable Satellites May Be Damaging the Earth's Magnetic Field
Victor Tangermann
Wed, April 17, 2024
Left Field
Dead satellites and other debris are constantly burning up as they fall out of Earth's orbit.
Conventional wisdom is destroying all that space junk is good, because it keeps orbit less cluttered. But it may have harmful effects on our planet's magnetic field, as plasma physicist and former Air Force research scientist Sierra Solter — the author of a contentious and yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper — argues in a new essay for The Guardian.
Ventures like Elon Musk's SpaceX are launching thousands of satellites into orbit, and tens of thousands more are soon to follow as interest in the private space industry and space tourism continues to grow.
But having retired satellites burn up in the Earth's atmosphere just might have disastrous effects on our planet, disturbing the plasma that forms a protective shell around it, shielding humanity from harmful radiation.
"After studying the problem for over a year, I have no doubt that the sheer vastness of this pollution is going to disrupt our delicate plasma environment in one way or another," Solter wrote, arguing that big money in "commercial space ventures" could stop us from "discussing this potential crisis."
Strip Show
Companies like SpaceX have long argued that satellites burning up during reentry into the Earth's atmosphere is a harmless process. Solter, however, believes this practice releases huge amounts of metallic ash, more than "an Eiffel Tower's worth" a year, directly into the ionosphere.
This ash, especially particulates of aluminum, could wreak havoc on — or even punch new holes into — the atmosphere's ozone layer, potentially leaving humanity exposed back on the ground.
"If all of these conductive materials accumulate into a huge layer of trash, it could trap or deflect all or parts of our magnetic field," Solter argued in the opinion piece. "The Earth is a ball magnet that we’re surrounding with fast-moving metal trash."
"People like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos repeatedly state that space is the key to human longevity," Solter wrote. "But what if it is the opposite? What if the space industry is the means to our pale blue dot’s demise?"
"Until this pollution is studied further, we should all reconsider satellite internet," she concluded.
More on the magnetosphere: Paper Claims Dying SpaceX Satellites Could Weaken Earth's Magnetic Field
Victor Tangermann
Wed, April 17, 2024
Left Field
Dead satellites and other debris are constantly burning up as they fall out of Earth's orbit.
Conventional wisdom is destroying all that space junk is good, because it keeps orbit less cluttered. But it may have harmful effects on our planet's magnetic field, as plasma physicist and former Air Force research scientist Sierra Solter — the author of a contentious and yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper — argues in a new essay for The Guardian.
Ventures like Elon Musk's SpaceX are launching thousands of satellites into orbit, and tens of thousands more are soon to follow as interest in the private space industry and space tourism continues to grow.
But having retired satellites burn up in the Earth's atmosphere just might have disastrous effects on our planet, disturbing the plasma that forms a protective shell around it, shielding humanity from harmful radiation.
"After studying the problem for over a year, I have no doubt that the sheer vastness of this pollution is going to disrupt our delicate plasma environment in one way or another," Solter wrote, arguing that big money in "commercial space ventures" could stop us from "discussing this potential crisis."
Strip Show
Companies like SpaceX have long argued that satellites burning up during reentry into the Earth's atmosphere is a harmless process. Solter, however, believes this practice releases huge amounts of metallic ash, more than "an Eiffel Tower's worth" a year, directly into the ionosphere.
This ash, especially particulates of aluminum, could wreak havoc on — or even punch new holes into — the atmosphere's ozone layer, potentially leaving humanity exposed back on the ground.
"If all of these conductive materials accumulate into a huge layer of trash, it could trap or deflect all or parts of our magnetic field," Solter argued in the opinion piece. "The Earth is a ball magnet that we’re surrounding with fast-moving metal trash."
"People like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos repeatedly state that space is the key to human longevity," Solter wrote. "But what if it is the opposite? What if the space industry is the means to our pale blue dot’s demise?"
"Until this pollution is studied further, we should all reconsider satellite internet," she concluded.
More on the magnetosphere: Paper Claims Dying SpaceX Satellites Could Weaken Earth's Magnetic Field
No comments:
Post a Comment