Bibi Has Been Giving Money to Hamas
An Insidious Intelligence Operation
Confirmed by Israeli media, not fake news. Bibi has been giving money to Hamas.
“Hamas was treated as a partner to the detriment of the Palestinian Authority to prevent Abbas from moving towards creating a Palestinian State. Hamas was promoted from a terrorist group to an organization with which Israel conducted negotiations through Egypt, and which was allowed to receive suitcases containing millions of dollars from Qatar through the Gaza crossings.” (Times of Israel, October 8, 2023, emphasis added)
According to Netanyahu:
“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas,” he [Netanyahu] told a meeting of his Likud party’s Knesset members in March 2019. “This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.” (Haaretz, October 9, 2023, emphasis added)
Let us be clear. These deceitful money payments are NOT in support of Hamas as a Palestinian political entity involved in the Resistance Movement. Quite the opposite.
What is at stake is an insidious intelligence op in support of so-called “intelligence assets” within Hamas.
What is at stake is a carefully planned false flag agenda, which from the outset on October 7, 2023, upholds Hamas as the alleged “aggressor” against the people of Israel.
What is the truth, what is the lie? The Netanyahu government and its Ministry of Intelligence from the very outset have “blood on their hands.” They are responsible for Israeli deaths resulting from the false flag agenda.
What is the relationship between Mossad and Hamas? There is a long history.
Hamas (Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya, Islamic Resistance Movement) was founded in 1987 by Sheik Ahmed Yassin. It was supported at the outset by Israeli intelligence as a means to weaken the Palestinian Authority:
“Thanks to Mossad, (Israel’s “Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks”), Hamas was allowed to reinforce its presence in the occupied territories. Meanwhile, Arafat’s Fatah Movement for National Liberation as well as the Palestinian Left were subjected to the most brutal form of repression and intimidation.
Let us not forget that it was Israel, which in fact created Hamas. According to Zeev Sternell, historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, “Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO)”. (L’Humanité, translated from French)
“How Israel helped to Spawn Hamas,” WSJ:
“Instead of trying to curb Gaza’s Islamists from the outset, says Mr. Cohen, Israel for years tolerated and, in some cases, encouraged them as a counterweight to the secular nationalists of the Palestine Liberation Organization and its dominant faction, Yasser Arafat’s Fatah. (WSJ, January 24, 2009, emphasis added)
The Historic Statement of Rep. Ron Paul:
“You know Hamas, if you look at the history, you’ll find out that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counteract Yasser Arafat… (Rep. Ron Paul, 2011)
What this statement entails is that Hamas is and remains “an intelligence asset,” namely an “asset” to Israel as well as US intelligence.
Ron Paul: Israel Created Hamas
Newsmax reported on Ron Paul’s comments in 2011 when he ran for president:
The Texas congressman advanced the argument that Israel actually created Hamas, as well as blamed the CIA for radicalizing Muslims and the United States for supplying weapons and money that “kill Palestinians.”
Israel “aided Hamas directly — the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance to the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization),” said Tony Cordesman, Middle East analyst for the Center for Strategic Studies. (Newsmax)
Israel’s support for Hamas “was a direct attempt to divide and dilute support for a strong, secular PLO by using a competing religious alternative,” said a former senior CIA official. (See Global Research)
Concluding Remarks
The ongoing October 7, 2023 false flag agenda is part of a longstanding historical process to destroy Palestine.
Flashback to 2001:
A major false flag operation was contemplated by Tel Aviv in 2001, predicated on the doctrine of “justified vengeance.” The strategic blueprint was entitled:
“The Destruction of the Palestinian Authority and Disarmament of All Armed Forces”
It was presented to the Israeli government by chief of staff Shaul Mofaz on July 8, 2001.
Israeli Victims. Bloodshed as a Justification
“The assault would be launched, at the government’s discretion, after a big suicide bomb attack in Israel, causing widespread deaths and injuries, citing the bloodshed as justification.
The subject was extensively discussed both by Israel’s military echelon and its political one, before it was decided to carry out the liquidation” (Yediot Aharonot, Nov. 25, 2001).
According to the late Prof. Tanya Reinhart,
“Israel’s moves to destroy the PA, thus, cannot be viewed as a spontaneous ‘act of retaliation’. It is a calculated plan, long in the making.
The execution requires, first, weakening the resistance of the Palestinians, which Israel has been doing systematically since October 2000,“through killing, bombarding of infrastructure, imprisoning people in their hometowns, and bringing them close to starvation.”
All this, while waiting for the international conditions to ‘ripen’ for the more ‘advanced’ steps of the plan.” (Tanya Rheinart)
- This article was first published by Global Research.
Surreal Reality: Global School Principal and His Favorite Monitor
IMAGE/Khaama Press
VIDEO/Mirror Now/Youtube
The Principal of Global School had asked his favorite Monitor to keep an eye on other students in the Middle East class.
The Monitor’s family had given hefty donation to the Principal for running the school. In return, the Principal would overlook small or big mistakes, blunders, wrongs, of his favorite Monitor, and would do him great favors. For a very long time, the Monitor’s been mad and has been punishing some particular students. Since last two years, the Monitor went totally rogue; he beat the hell out of five students. One of those students, the first student, witnessed half his house burned down. The Principal, a peace loving person, avoids hassles and so didn’t say anything to the Monitor — and earned suggestions of his name for the Noble Peace Prize.
Then one day the Monitor beat up the sixth student. It was a humongous dilemma for the Principal: the sixth student had given big donation too, and had gifted a fast vehicle to the Principal. It is a universal fact that the Principal rarely says no to the Monitor. The Principal has a doctorate in The Art of the Deal; he found a way out. Although he permitted to strike the sixth one. After fifteen or so minutes he called the student to inform him. The sixth student was crying: the Monitor had already finished his job.
The Principal said: I called you the minute I knew. The Principal sensed the sixth one’s anger and decided to do something.
When, the Monitor went to the Principal’s office to report how the Middle East class was doing, the Principal handed him a piece of paper with a written apology which the Monitor was ordered to read out to the sixth student, on the phone. The Principal didn’t want to piss off one of his big donors.
The Monitor didn’t like it but then he thought: I control the whole Middle East class, I have so much power, unimaginable. After Principal, I am the only one with so much power — that power is due to money and fighting toys from the Principal’s family. I better say sorry, as it is small
inconvenience to continue the abundance being received.
The Monitor half-heartedly said sorry, but the humiliation he felt and the reluctance to apologize was clearly visible on his face. The sixth student just wanted to hear an apology to save his face. The Principal’s donations from that student are now secure.
The Principal wrote a personal letter assuring the sixth student that from now on any attack on him would be considered a “threat” to the Principal himself.
But it was the Monitor who got the last laugh. The Principal promised the first student that his half burnt house will be somewhat fixed and he’ll be permitted to reside there. But it is the Monitor at whose whim the repair will begin — it may be forever delayed or postponed.
No comments:
Post a Comment