Friday, September 26, 2025


The Reason Hegseth Summoned Hundreds of Generals to DC Is to Hear His Speech on ‘Warrior Ethos’: Report

Mediaite
Fri, September 26, 2025


Pete Hegseth
AP Photo/Kevin Wolf

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered hundreds of the military’s highest-ranking leaders to gather next week at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, for what the Pentagon is billing as a lecture on “warrior ethos.”

According to reporting by The Washington Post, the summons, delivered with little notice, applies to every one-star general and admiral in command positions, along with their senior enlisted counterparts. Attendance, officials were told, is mandatory; exceptions will be rare and require sign-off from top brass. The meeting is set for September 30, the final day of the government’s fiscal year.

Pentagon officials have released few details about the event beyond confirming that Hegseth intends to address the assembled commanders. His team has framed it as the first in a series of short, themed talks: this one on “warrior ethos,” with future sessions on the defense industrial base and deterrence planned in the months ahead, multiple sources told the Post.

“It’s meant to be an eyeball-to-eyeball kind of conversation,” said one source, described as a “person familiar with ongoing discussions” in the Post article. “He wants to see the generals.”

The directive, however, has sparked unease across military circles. Staff officers scrambled to arrange last-minute travel, while some lawmakers questioned the costs and optics of pulling so many senior leaders away from their posts simultaneously — especially on the eve of a potential government shutdown.

Per the Post, Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), an Army veteran, prepared a letter questioning the cost and potential security risks of pulling so many top commanders away from their posts on short notice. Her office began circulating the draft on Friday in hopes of securing additional Democratic signatures, while also pressing for a Pentagon briefing ahead of Tuesday’s meeting.



Also on Friday, Hegseth responded to a post on X from retired senior officer Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges comparing his planned address to Nazi-era political moves, writing, “Cool story, General.”


Pentagon chief orders US military officials from around the world to Virginia next week


U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth hosts a ceremony honoring prisoners of war, in Washington


Thu, September 25, 2025 
By Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has summoned senior U.S. military officers from around the world to a meeting in Quantico, Virginia next week, five officials told Reuters on Thursday, a rare gathering of U.S. military leadership in one location.

It was not clear why Hegseth has ordered the generals and admirals to meet in one place on such short notice, and two of the officials said this has created uncertainty among the expected attendees.

Senior military officials in some cases command thousands of troops. Most have detailed schedules weeks in advance, which have now been upended.

"People are scrambling to change their plans and see if they have to attend," one U.S. official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

It was unclear how many officials will actually attend the event, but it is rare to have so many senior officials in the same room at the same time.

Asked for comment, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said only: "The Secretary of War will be addressing his senior military leaders early next week." Trump has ordered the department to rename itself the Department of War, a change that will require action by Congress.

Parnell's office did not respond to questions about the number of officers, purpose of the meeting or why Hegseth called so abruptly.

At the White House, U.S. Vice President JD Vance said such a meeting was "not unusual at all."

The U.S. has troops around the world, including in distant locations like South Korea, Japan and across the Middle East-- which are commanded by two, three and four-star generals and admirals.

Hegseth, a former Fox News host, has moved with stunning speed to reshape the department, firing top generals and admirals as he seeks to implement Trump's national security agenda and root out diversity initiatives he calls discriminatory.

In February, he fired Air Force General C.Q. Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of U.S. military leadership.

Last month, Hegseth fired the head of the Pentagon's intelligence agency and two other senior military commanders.

In May, Hegseth ordered a 20% reduction in the number of four-star officers. In that May memo, Hegseth said there would also be a minimum 20% reduction in the number of general officers in the National Guard and an additional 10% reduction among general and flag officers across the military.

"More generals and admirals does not lead to more success," Hegseth said at the time.

Now, many of those generals and admirals will be in the same room.

"It's probably more mundane than people think... (but) the lack of clarity isn't helping," the official said.

(Reporting by Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart; Editing by David Gregorio)


As Our Generals and Admirals Fly Home, 
Our Adversaries Watch and Wait

Mark Hertling
Thu, September 25, 2025
THE BULWARK




WHEN I SAW THE NEWS that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had ordered all U.S. military flag officers (generals and admirals) to gather at the Marine base in Quantico, Virginia, next week along with their senior enlisted advisors, my first response was disbelief. Not disbelief that the secretary of defense might want to deliver a strong message to the senior leaders of the force, but disbelief at the method.

In my forty years in uniform, I never saw anything like it. While senior leaders have been recalled to Washington to meet with the secretary of defense during all our wars, never once did a secretary summon all of the hundreds of one- to four-stars from each of the services, plus their top enlisted counterparts, from every corner of the globe to a single auditorium. Not during the Cold War, not during Desert Storm, not during the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not Rumsfeld, not Gates, not Panetta, not Mattis, not Austin.

They likely didn’t do it because it is disruptive. It is expensive. And it is unnecessary.

Even more remarkable, no one seems to know the reason for the meeting or what Secretary Hegseth intends to say. Normally, even when classified issues are in play, senior leaders have at least a broad sense of the agenda at a meeting of general officers and flag officers (GOFOs) and their senior enlisted advisors. Here, nothing. So, as you might imagine, speculation is running rampant.

And where speculation thrives, humor follows. A retired command sergeant major who once served at my side joked with me that maybe Secretary Hegseth just wants to give a “payday safety briefing.” That’s the talk small-unit leaders give their troops after payday: “Don’t drink and drive; stay out of trouble; don’t do dumb things; stay out of jail!” It’s absurd to imagine four-star generals being lectured on avoiding DUIs. But that again just brings us back to our speculation: If not that, then what could possibly justify such an expensive, disruptive spectacle?

There are a handful of possible explanations.

The global security environment is fraught with dangers, so perhaps the meeting has to do with a rapidly shifting national security strategy. Russia continues to press on Ukraine and Ukraine is answering with aplomb. China postures in the Pacific. The Middle East simmers. NATO feels strain both inside and out; currently, the United States and its allies are conducting a massive nuclear exercise in Europe. Perhaps Hegseth wants to frame a major shift in U.S. defense priorities—something so consequential he believes it must be done face to face.

Or perhaps, since the secretary has publicly floated proposals to shrink the number of general and flag officers, he’s ready to make an announcement to the assembled mass of senior leaders. Since he’s already fired a dozen generals, by summoning the entire group, he could be sending a warning shot: “You’re all on notice.” Since it seems Congress is mired in fights over defense spending and there are some doubts about a spending bill passing next week, Hegseth may want to discuss cuts, delays, or reprioritization of funds. The secretary may want to prepare the force for fiscal pain.

Hegseth has voiced anger over the leaking of classified, and even unclassified, information to the point that he recently quashed journalists’ ability to freely report inside the Pentagon. Perhaps he wants his commanders to echo that approach, or maybe he believes a closed-door confrontation with the senior ranks is the best, most efficient way to handle the issue.

Or maybe this meeting has as its primary goal the optics of power, the secretary reminding his senior troops that he’s in charge. It’s hard to picture that—every senior officer in the U.S. military corralled in one place, under his glare. I personally hope that’s not the reason for this gathering, as that’s power theater, not crisis management.

After addressing all these potential reasons, one thing that our media may not be considering: Adversaries and allies are watching. This sudden, global, emergency recall of America’s top brass is a flashing red light to them: Something must be wrong inside the Pentagon.

Even if one accepts that any of these issues—strategies, cuts, budgets, leaks, or priorities—demands immediate attention, the method is baffling and the cost will be staggering: millions of dollars in taxpayer money. And that’s before counting the opportunity cost of lost focus and readiness. To Quantico will come four-star commanders from Korea and Japan, Hawaii and Europe. Three-stars from the UAE, Qatar, Iraq, and other Middle Eastern posts. Two-stars and one-stars from Germany, Italy, and various NATO headquarters. Officers will literally disembark from aircraft carriers in the South China Sea or the Mediterranean to catch flights. Each will travel with aides, communications specialists, and security teams. All will require flights, hotel rooms, and transportation.

Every one of those leaders has an important mission. A combatant commander in the Pacific manages deterrence against China and North Korea as well as preparedness against other adversaries. A three-star in the Middle East balances fragile coalitions while countering Iranian aggression. A two-star in Europe helps oversee U.S. and NATO responses to Russia. Pulling them all out at once hollows out the top tier of global command. Deputies will cover, yes—but adversaries will notice the vacuum. This is not an abstraction. The United States is engaged in active deterrence across multiple theaters. Our enemies watch for seams. To disrupt the world’s most powerful military by having its leaders travel across multiple time zones to stage a mass meeting in Virginia is nothing less than operational malpractice.

THE IRONY IS that better options exist—and have been proven in practice. Secure video teleconferencing has been part of Pentagon life for decades. During the early stages of the War on Terror, President George W. Bush personally held secure VTCs with combatant commanders across the global footprint: Afghanistan, Iraq, the Horn of Africa, Europe, the Pacific, Korea. The president of the United States could span the world in a single conversation, connecting directly with leaders on the ground.


As the U.S. Army’s operations officer and later as the commander in Europe, I sat in on secure video sessions with the Pentagon one afternoon each week from 2004 to 2011, except when I was deployed to Iraq. We spent hours every Saturday connecting with commanders from across the globe, sharing situational awareness, synchronizing planning, passing critical information, and executing global contingencies—all without flying hundreds of generals and admirals away from their posts.

That was wartime. That was crisis. And it was done virtually, securely, effectively. So why is it suddenly necessary to convene at Quantico?

Inside the force, this recall will be read as a show of power. It will be received less as We need you here and more as I can make you come. In private conversations, senior leaders will ask the obvious question: Why are we spending millions and creating global vulnerabilities for a meeting that could be done in an hour on secure video? As they say in baseball, it’s a long run for a short slide.

Leaders won’t ask it publicly. But the quiet skepticism will erode confidence and trust in civilian leadership. That erosion matters. In the military, morale is built not only on what leaders say but on whether they make sound decisions.

The troops on the ground may joke, as my friend did, about a “payday safety briefing.” The rest of us should recognize the deeper concern: In a moment when readiness is our greatest asset, the secretary of defense has chosen disruption, cost, and vulnerability to stage a demonstration of power.

It’s the wrong message, delivered in the wrong way, at the wrong time.


Hegseth sparks military “anxiety” with demand for meeting

Garrett Owen
Thu, September 25, 2025 
SALON


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth helps curb his lie detector program just as he faces scrutiny for his own leaking scandal. Celal Gunes / Anadolu / Getty Images

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has issued urgent orders for 800 generals and admirals in the U.S. military worldwide to a meeting at a Marine Corps base in Quantico, Virginia, on short notice and without a stated reason, The Washington Post first reported.

According to sources familiar with the matter, the orders were issued earlier this week and have caused alarm and confusion among the nation’s top brass. The orders, highly unusual in their own right, come in the midst of a looming government shutdown and on the heels of the Trump administration attempting to rename the Department of Defense the “Department of War.”

Pentagon spokesman and senior Hegseth adviser, Sean Parnell, said in a statement released Thursday that Hegseth “will be addressing his senior military leaders early next week,” but offered no further details. Among the commanders expected to be at the gathering are those currently in active war zones and diplomatically sensitive areas, such as the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region.

“People are very concerned. They have no idea what it means,” one person familiar with the orders told the Post.

Others expressed frustration and noted that military preparedness could be compromised by the meeting.

“It will make the commands just diminished if something pops up,” a defense official said.

Another person took issue with the sudden ordering of hundreds of high-ranking officials to one location, saying this is “not how it is done.”

Start your day with essential news from Salon.
Sign up for our free morning newsletter, Crash Course.

The New York Times also reported that the order has been given, reporting that it “has stirred anxiety among the military’s top ranks.”

Since his confirmation earlier this year, Hegseth has been at the helm of dramatic changes at the Pentagon. In April, Hegseth oversaw a “DEI purge” at the U.S. Naval Academy, leading to controversial book bans there.

In May, Hegseth issued a directive to remove 100 generals and admirals from their positions. Following this, Hegseth called for a 20% cut of four-star generals in active service and in the National Guard. In June, he ordered the Navy to rename one its ships, which bore the name of an assassinated gay rights activist and Navy veteran, Harvey Milk.

The post Hegseth sparks military “anxiety” with demand for meeting appeared first on Salon.com.



Hegseth orders top brass to attend last-minute meeting at Quantico early next week

Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY
Thu, September 25, 2025 at 10:40 AM MDT

WASHINGTON − Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered about 800 senior military leaders stationed around the world to come to a last-minute meeting in northern Virginia on Sept. 30.

A meeting with such senior leadership would normally be planned months in advance.

"The secretary of war will be addressing his senior military leaders early next week," Pentagon chief spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement. The Pentagon declined to disclose the reason for the meeting, which will occur at Quantico, a Marine Corps base around 30 miles south of the Pentagon.

All senior officers at the rank of brigadier general and above must attend the meeting, according to the Washington Post, which first reported the meeting. Around 800 officers currently fall into that category, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Senior military officials in some cases command thousands of troops. Most have detailed schedules weeks in advance, which have now been upended.

It was unclear how many officials would actually attend the event, but it is rare to have so many senior officials in the same room at the same time.

The U.S. has troops around the world, including in distant locations like South Korea, Japan and across the Middle East – which are commanded by two, three and four-star generals and admirals.

Hegseth, a former Fox News host, has moved with stunning speed to reshape the department, firing top generals and admirals as he seeks to implement Trump's national security agenda and root out diversity initiatives he calls discriminatory.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth convened a sudden meeting with around 800 senior military officers on Tuesday.

In February, he fired Air Force General C.Q. Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with five other admirals and generals in an unprecedented shake-up of U.S. military leadership.

Last month, Hegseth fired the head of the Pentagon's intelligence agency and two other senior military commanders.

In May, Hegseth ordered a 20% reduction in the number of four-star officers. In that May memo, Hegseth said there would also be a minimum 20% reduction in the number of general officers in the National Guard and an additional 10% reduction among general and flag officers across the military.

"More generals and admirals does not lead to more success," Hegseth said at the time.

Now, many of those generals and admirals will be in the same room.

Contributing: Reuters

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Hegseth orders last-minute meeting of top military brass next week

Opinion

Pete Hegseth Calls Alarming Meeting With Hundreds of Military Leaders

Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
Thu, September 25, 2025 
THE NEW REPUBLIC




Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has urgently called on hundreds of U.S. military officials around the globe for a spontaneous meeting at a Marine Corps base in Virginia next week, though the reason for the gathering remains top secret.

The unusual directive was received by top military commanders stationed around the world, ordering them to meet in Quantico on Tuesday, reported The Washington Post. There are approximately 800 U.S. generals and admirals in total. Hegseth’s order applies to “all senior officers with the rank of brigadier general or above, or their Navy equivalent, serving in command positions and their top enlisted advisers,” insiders told the Post. It does not apply to military officers who hold staff positions.

In a statement Thursday, Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell told the Post that Hegseth “will be addressing his senior military leaders early next week,” but did not clarify further.

The message shocked members of the U.S. military, who could not recall another instance in which a defense secretary summoned so many commanders for a sudden in-person meeting—especially without a clear rationale. Some warned that having so many integral military leaders in one place could pose a national security risk.

“People are very concerned. They have no idea what it means,” one source told the Post.

Another military source expressed frustration that commanders stationed overseas would also be required to attend: It’s “not how this is done,” they said. “You don’t call [general and flag officers] leading their people and the global force into an auditorium outside D.C. and not tell them why/what the topic or agenda is.”

“Are we taking every general and flag officer out of the Pacific right now?” a third U.S. official told the Post. “All of it is weird.”

























HEGSETH CALLED THEM ALL TO WASHINGTON 
TO WATCH THIS MOVIE 




Germany’s Bosch to cut 13,000 jobs at its auto-parts business

The Bosch plant in Hildesheim, Germany. 22 Nov. 2024.
Copyright Alicia Windzio/AP/DPA

By Eleanor Butler
Published on 

The engineering giant is hoping the job cuts will save €2.5bn as Europe’s car market crisis stretches on.

Bosch will cut around 13,000 extra jobs at its auto-parts business by 2030, representing about 3% of its global workforce.

The cuts, which come on top of thousands of job losses at Bosch in recent years, will mainly affect positions in Germany.

The company’s base in the Stuttgart region is set to be the hardest hit, while sites in areas such as Feuerbach and Schwieberdingen will see thousands of job cuts.

The engineering giant is seeking to claw back €2.5 billion in losses “as quickly as possible” as Europe’s car industry remains in the doldrums.

The firm said it intends to begin discussions with affected employees immedia

Carmakers are struggling with lacklustre demand, elevated labour and energy costs, and competition from cheaper, Chinese models, as well as raised tariffs on US exports. These duties on cars and car parts are currently charged at a 15% rate, down from a previously threatened rate of 27.5%.

As pressure from the US hits margins, the transition to electric mobility is also complicating matters for carmakers, as uncertainty looms over the EU’s targets to reduce carbon emissions. Several European governments have also scaled back EV subsidies for consumers, hitting demand.

Bosch is one of several producers seeking to cut costs in the face of these headwinds. European firms including Volkswagen and Volvo have announced job cuts this year, as well as non-European firms such as Nissan and Stellantis.

As well as reducing its workforce, Bosch said it plans to decrease investments in manufacturing facilities in response to slowing demand.

Bosch's announcement comes as blow to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who is seeking to attract investment and revitalise the country's flailing industrial sector with promises of greater state spending.

Germany this year approved a constitutional amendment to its ‘debt brake’ rule, meaning defence spending above 1% of GDP will not be subject to borrowing limits. The government has also created a €500bn extrabudgetary fund for additional infrastructure spending, set to provide Germany with an economic boost.

German GDP is set to grow by 0.2% this year following two years of contraction, although experts warn the economy is still on shaky ground.

 

COMMENT: China trumps Trump on soy

COMMENT: China trumps Trump on soy
/ bno IntelliNews
By Mark Buckton - Taipei September 25, 2025

China’s sudden pivot to Argentine soybeans this week is the latest manoeuvre in a quietly escalating battle for agricultural influence, and a clear example of how Beijing can use market muscle and timing to put Washington on the back foot.

In the space of just a few days, Chinese buyers have reportedly snapped up as many as 20 Panamax cargoes of Argentine soybeans after Buenos Aires temporarily suspended its 26% grain export tax according to Reuters and other agencies. It was a policy shift that immediately made Argentine soybean supplies cheaper and more attractive on world markets.

Traders have said the purchases, believed to amount to roughly 1.3m tonnes according to Reuters, and set for November shipment, came within just a few hours of the tax announcement, underlining how nimble purchases can be when policy windows open.

For US farmers and policymakers, the timing is bitter. Washington has for months sought to cultivate closer ties with Buenos Aires, even extending assurances of substantial financial support as Argentina works to stabilise its battered economy.

Yet the quick sequence - US assistance followed almost immediately by Argentina offering cheaper soy to global markets, most prominently China - highlights a geopolitical reality: money alone cannot bind trade loyalties.

The broader economic effect was immediate with analysts overnight September 24/25 flagging the move as another blow to an already bruised US export season in which China has bought little or no US soy.

That absence is not solely about price and lost revenue, however. It is the residue of a punitive tariff imposed by the US earlier in the summer, and a wider, long-term game by Beijing to diversify suppliers and reduce dependence on US agricultural exports.

In short, China is using Argentina as a pawn in a chess game with the US, to lower the cost of access to global soy supplies while simultaneously weakening a key US export sector.

That dynamic is not novel, but the ferocity of the latest episode is telling. Argentina’s tax suspension, painted out in local Spanish language media as a temporary measure to stimulate shipments and relieve storage pressures, was instantly met with a flurry of orders from half a world away.

Behind this was a slew of Chinese buyers, with an appetite for Q4 restocking, and, behind the buyers, although as of yet unconfirmed, more than likely an order from Beijing to buy, buy, buy - in the process once again bloodying Washington’s nose. From Beijing’s perspective this reads as smart, unromantic state backed manoeuvring: exploit a rival’s policy window, buy cheap, and inflict political pain in rural America.

This also plays into a long-standing US narrative in which America’s political economy is highly vulnerable to concentrated, visible shocks that affect congressional districts and swing voters nationwide.

China’s procurement decisions are opaque and centralised. They always have been. Beijing can quietly reroute demand elsewhere without having to answer to farmers at home – unlike a great many congressmen in Republican farming areas across the US.

Argentine policymakers meanwhile continue to exercise discretion. If waiving an export tax brings in foreign currency and placates domestic producers, it is a logical short-term choice in an economy that is teetering on the edge and any day may topple over.

Several thousand kilometres north of Argentina, American soybean growers for now see the result in starkly personal terms. Industry groups have already responded with alarm, urging negotiators in Washington to secure a deal with Beijing swiftly or risk further erosion of market share. These are calls for help that even President Donald Trump cannot ignore.

The political calculus is simple: lost sales translate into lost incomes – and in time, lost votes.

For Beijing, there is further benefit beyond immediate bargain hunting. Filling tanks with Argentine soy serves several purposes, notably reducing China’s exposure to a single supplier during an era of tense US-China relations. It also signals to global markets that China can pivot when geopolitics tighten. Most crucially perhaps in the eyes of Beijing, it also exerts pressure on US negotiators by weaponising commodity markets in a way that is hard to counter without conceding on tariffs or other political terrain.

That tactic alone forces a choice on Trump and Washington: either accept the pain and pursue a longer game of strategic decoupling, or respond with trade concessions that could be politically costly at home.

Either way, Beijing has used a third party – Argentina - as a bit-player of sorts with which to score points.

Whether Buenos Aires regards itself as a pawn or an opportunistic actor is moot; the bigger picture is being seen globally as Trump having been trumped over soy – by China.

'No sign of Chinese buying': Trump credited for 'devastating' US farmers' soybeans market​

Nicole Charky-Chami
September 24, 2025 
RAW STORY


Jake Guse, a crop scout on the Pro Farmer Crop Tour, collects corn samples from a corn field as scouts travel across the midwest trying to gauge the size of the corn and soybean crop that farmers will harvest in the fall, in northwest Indiana on Aug. 19, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

President Donald Trump's tariffs have decimated U.S. farmers' soybean market and there is "no sign of Chinese buying."

The fall harvest has started without any orders from China, the world's biggest buyer, according to a new report published on agriculture.com's Successful Farming.

American farmers are reporting record yields for crops this fall but it's unclear who will buy them. The USDA estimates that American farmers are harvesting 4.3 billion bushels, however there is no indication if or when shipments to China will continue. Most years, China buys more than half of U.S. soybean exports — but not this year.

Brazil, however, has had record demand from China from January to August 2025 for Brazilian soybeans. And in the new report, experts "consider the possible consequences if a trade deal is not reached this fall."

"From the 2017/18 to the 2024/25 crop season, Brazil jumped its soybean production from 4.5 billion bushels to 6.3 billion bushels, according to the National Supply Company (Conab) – Brazil’s food supply and statistics agency."

There is speculation that Chinese buyers importing soybeans could be "accelerating shipments to avoid sourcing from the United States."

The ongoing trade war between China and the U.S. is testing farmers' faith in the Trump administration. During the first trade war in 2018 during Trump's first term, farmers took a hit and during President Joe Biden's term had begun to recover.

Now under Trump's second term, farmers have called for more assistance during the prolonged economic uncertainty.

"Some relief might come from federal government payments to producers, as happened during the first round of trade war, but in many cases, that assistance may not be enough to prevent an uptick in financial stress," according to the report.

Chinese buyers are expected to continue shifting soybean purchases to other South American countries, including Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia. These countries are planning to expand planting acreage for their crops and focusing on planting soon for the 2025 and 2026 crop in the Southern Hemisphere.

Critics are pointing to Trump's trade policies as a major disruption to the U.S. agriculture industry.

"Until Trump's first term, the US was by far the world's largest exporter of soybeans. Now Brazil dominates," David Frum, writer at The Atlantic, wrote via X.

"Has Iowa thanked Trump/Vance for devastating their soybeans market?" Former U.S. Representative Barbara Comstock (R-VA) wrote on X.



WSJ's conservative editors skewer Trump over $100K 'mistake': 'Abusing his powers'

Matthew Chapman
September 25, 2025 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures after signing the sweeping spending and tax legislation, known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

The conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board raked President Donald Trump over the coals for his new "mistake" — charging companies $100,000 for every H-1B visa, the work authorization program heavily used by tech companies and other industries that need highly-skilled foreign labor.

"The $100,000 fee is a de facto tax on hiring skilled foreign workers in the U.S., and the transparent goal is to price them out of the market," wrote the board, which has grown increasingly exasperated with Trump's economic policies. "Companies hire foreigners because there aren’t enough Americans graduating from U.S. colleges with the right technical skills. International students account for 71% of the full-time graduate students in computer and information sciences."

As an example, the board noted, Tesla, the flagship automaker headed by Trump's 2024 benefactor and erstwhile government reform adviser Elon Musk, "filed 658 visa applications for manufacturing engineers in 2024, a skill set that isn’t taught at many elite U.S. colleges."

The idea behind this change is to curtail companies' use of cheap foreign labor to undercut U.S. wages — but the whole premise is flawed, wrote the board.

"There’s scant evidence that foreign workers are taking U.S. jobs," the board continued. "Between 2003 and 2024, U.S.-born employment in STEM occupations increased by three million, according to the National Foundation for American Policy. The unemployment rate for computer and math occupations was 3% and 1.4% for architecture and engineering last month, both lower than a year ago. The White House ignores that employers are required to pay visa holders the higher of the prevailing wage or actual wage paid to comparable U.S. workers. So there’s no financial incentive to hire foreign workers. An analysis by Glassdoor found that salaries for 'foreign H-1B workers are about 2.8 percent higher than comparable U.S. salaries' on the job-search platform."

Above all, said the board, Congress didn't authorize this $100,000 charge in the first place, and Trump is trying to claim it's allowed under his emergency national security powers.

"Federal law doesn’t give the President carte blanche authority to set visa fees, so he’s invoking a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that lets a President restrict entry of foreigners to protect national security. He claims, again without evidence, that the H-1B program is a national-security threat," wrote the board. "As with his willy-nilly tariffs, he’s abusing his national-security powers."
Epstein investigator makes bombshell claims about Trump in hidden camera video: report


Travis Gettys
September 25, 2025 
RAW STORY


A person walks past a poster with a photograph of Donald Trump, now serving as the U.S. President, and disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, protesting Trump’s upcoming state visit to the UK, in London, Britain, September 3, 2025. REUTERS/Isabel Infantes/File Photo

A Department of Justice veteran who says he interviewed Jeffrey Epstein's victims was caught on camera claiming that President Donald Trump is engaged in a coverup to protect the late sex offender's co-conspirators


Hidden-camera footage released by Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe, who's been accused of releasing deceptively edited videos in the past, appears to capture former DOJ investigator Glenn Prager speaking about the Epstein files during a flight earlier this month from Phoenix to Washington, D.C., reported The Daily Beast.

“I’ve interviewed all the victims,” Prager says in the video. “There’s never been an instance where Trump was on a plane with these kids and the rapes occurred.”


“People want to tie it to [Trump] and say he’s covering up for himself, but he’s not,” Prager adds.

Prager, whose LinkedIn profile states that he has more than 25 years of experience in oversight and investigations for the DOJ, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, claims that Trump is "protecting a lot of people" by refusing to order the release of the Epstein files despite promising to do so during his re-election campaign.

“I don’t know what’s new that I have never seen,” Prager says in the video. “He’s so hesitant to show what’s going on with releasing all his files. I think he’s protecting a lot of other people.”

Trump has long sought to distance himself from the disgraced financier, who died in a Manhattan holding cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on additional sex trafficking charges. The president has attempted to deflect from his possible involvement in Epstein's crime network by calling the investigation a "hoax" – which Prager strongly disputed.

“I mean, come on,” Prager says in the video. “You know it’s not a hoax... He says a lot of stupid stuff. He’s been on the plane, now, many times. It’s just, he was never on the plane with the kids.”

Prager also claims that Epstein will eventually be unmasked as "a CIA informant," which has been the basis of many conspiracy theories about the late financier and philanthropist.

The White House referred The Daily Beast to DOJ when asked to comment, but that agency did not follow up on a statement provided to O'Keefe: “This individual [Glenn Prager] worked at the Department of Justice as a program analyst over 15 years ago. He has no understanding of, or access to, the underlying facts in this investigation. His statements should not be considered accurate. It is disgusting that someone would further exploit victims of sexual abuse by fabricating stories for their personal benefit.”







'Dude!' Trump secretary stuns by revealing taxpayer bailout to sway Argentina election


Travis Gettys
September 24, 2025 
RAW STORY




Milei met with met with former US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of a conservative conference (Handout)

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent admitted that Donald Trump's administration was trying to help Argentina President Javier Milei maintain power by extending billions of loans to boost that nation's economy.

The U.S. will extend a $20 billion swap line to Argentina and may purchase debt from its government to boost the political fortunes for the libertarian Milei, a close ally of Trump, Bessent and other American conservatives, the treasury secretary told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo.

“I don’t think the market has lost confidence in [Milei],” Bessent said. “I think the market is looking in the rearview mirror and looking at decades — about a century — of terrible Argentinian mismanagement.”

Milei is facing growing financial pressure since his party lost a key provincial election earlier this month in a landslide, just weeks ahead of Argentina's Oct. 26 midterm elections, and Bessent told Bartiromo the aid was intended as a political boost.

"The plan is as long as President Milei continues with his strong economic policies to help him, to bridge him to the election, we are not going to let a disequilibrium in the market cause a backup in his substantial economic reforms," Bessent said.

The admission stunned social media users, some of whom wondered why he'd say that out loud.

"'To bridge him to the election' – dude, you're not supposed to say that part out loud," posted author Rob Tracinski.

"Scott Bessent links bailout of Argentina to Trump's election interference, even as Argentina poaches U.S. soybean markets," wrote legal expert Marcy Wheeler, linking to her blog post on the topic.

"Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explicitly states that U.S. intervention in the Argentinian economy is to help Javier Milei in his upcoming election," said political and media researcher Craig Harrington.

"BESSENT: INVESTMENTS HINGE ON A POSITIVE ELECTION OUTCOME," noted Bluesky user Nacmtrader17. "Vote for our preferred candidate and we will bail you out."

"Absolutely NOT!" added Bluesky user Tamela Ehlinger. "None of our tax $$$ go to Argentina for the mad man who tanked their economy & will do the same with a cash infusion Bessent & the orange-tainted howler monkey want to do this to make sure that Milei wins the next election to keep another bastard in power."











GOP lawmaker pushes to make mentioning 'West Bank' illegal
Florida Phoenix
September 25, 2025 


Mimi Ziad poses with a Palestine sign ahead of an anti protest against the U.S. President-elect Donald Trump at Meridian Hill Park in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025. REUTERS/Marko Djurica

Nearly two years into the war in Gaza, a Florida Republican proposes to ban state agencies from mentioning the West Bank, the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territory, and enforce “Judea and Samaria” as the official name for the Middle Eastern battleground.

Rep. Chase Tramont, a Port Orange Republican, introduced HB 31 Tuesday in hopes of replacing the “West Bank” phrase with the biblical name for the regions north and south of Jerusalem and widely used by right-wing Israelis to describe the Jordan River territory.

The move comes amid strong Floridian support for Israel and an overall split in foreign politics on whether to back Israel in its campaign to eradicate Hamas, a designated terrorist organization backed by Iran, or recognize Palestine as a state following allegations that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is orchestrating a genocide.

“With this bill, Florida sends a clear message: we will stand with Israel, we’ll honor truth over revisionism, and defend the eternal bond between the Jewish people and their ancestral homeland,” Tramont told the Florida Phoenix in a statement, condemning other nations’ “egregious” decisions to recognize Palestinian statehood.

“I believe it’s appropriate for Florida to lead the way once again. Judea and Samaria was, is, and always will be recognized as Israeli sovereign land,” he added. His bill both declares the legislature’s “intent” to call that land Judea and Samaria, and bans state agencies from using the term “West Bank” on official government material.

It does create an exception for agency heads to waive the prohibition if they determine using “West Bank” is in Florida’s “best interest” and send a written explanation within a month of the realization to the Senate President and Speaker of the House, the bills says.

A congressional copy…

HB 31 is a near replica of a federal bill introduced in February by House and Senate Republicans, although the measure has yet to advance to a vote. It referenced Israel’s annexation of the territory from Jordan in 1967, citing its historical claim to the ancient “Judea and Samaria.” Since then, the Israeli military has occupied the area.

“The Jewish people’s legal and historic rights to Judea and Samaria goes back thousands of years,” Republican U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton said at the time, The New York Times reported. He asked for the U.S. to “stop using the politically charged term West Bank.”

Following Hamas’s ambush and murder of more than a thousand Israelis during music festival on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel has launched a no-holds-barred counter-offensive deep into Palestinian-occupied areas in the Gaza Strip. Florida officials reacted quickly, passing resolutions strongly backing Israel and punishing businesses that boycott its government.

Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a slew of press conferences statewide to decry pro-Palestinian protesters setting up encampments on university campuses, encouraging the U.S. government to revoke their student visas. Months later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio obliged.

Since then, Netanyahu has come under fire from prominent peace organizations including the United Nations. A UN commission of inquiry released a report last week claiming he’s led a genocide in Gaza. Despite this, top U.S. officials continue to tout their strong relationship with Israel, a leading Middle East ally for the United States, to the point that President Donald Trump in June dropped bunker-buster bombs in Iran in coordination with Israel.
Here’s the truth about Trump and cancel culture

Gregg Barak
September 25, 2025 
RAW ST0RY


Donald Trump looks on during the 80th United Nations General Assembly,
 in New York City. REUTERS/Al Drago


Before there was cultural cancellation, there was individual cancellation. As far back as 1981, there was the song by Nile Rodgers, Your Love is Cancelled, comparing his first and only date with a woman to the cancellation of a TV show.

A decade later, in the 1991 film New Jack City, screenwriter Barry Cooper included a reference to individual Black women being cancelled, a connection to the African-American vernacular and community. Boosted years later on Black Twitter, by the end of the second year of Donald Trump’s first administration “cancellation” had gone from a Black cultural punchline to a white grievance watchword, on behalf of both rightwing Christian nationalists and outright Nazis, all complaining while themselves wishing to do away with the separation of church and state – a true cancellation of American culture, should it be achieved.

By then, as the New York Times reporter Jonah E. Bromwich pointed out, “Almost everyone worth knowing [was being] cancelled by someone” — among them celebrities such as Roseanne Barr, Bill Gates, soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo, Gwen Stefani, and Kanye West.

Crucially, though, none of these individuals was cancelled by the government or the Supreme Court, or whatever form Big Brother might take.

This week, while it only took a few days for Disney to bow to artistic, public, and political pressure before returning late-night host Jimmy Kimmel to our screens on Tuesday, conservative media companies like Nexstar or Sinclair simply carried on cancelling, substituting news programming for Kimmel on ABC affiliates, well on their way to monopolizing rightwing disinformation on local stations not unlike Fox News.

The original societal cancellation of individuals by ostracizing, boycotting, shunning, or firing, by withdrawing support or sanctioning “banishment” for harmful, obscene, or discriminatory behavior, has morphed into “cancel culture” by executive order or state-sanctioned social control, as a means of targeting larger groups or classes of people.

Think of the 160 UC Berkeley professors and students being investigated by the Trump administration for pro-Palestinian activism. Think of the president’s crackdown on international students and academic freedom in the name of — wait, wait, don’t laugh — the First Amendment.

Think of the government prying into the faculty business of those who conduct research and report their findings on gender, equity, and inclusion, on science and the environment. Think of the government censoring some of those 97 percent of late-night comedians who, according to Trump, are telling negative stories about him.

Finally, think of the cancellation of those members of Trump’s Department of Justice who are resisting or refusing to participate in the president’s corrupt and targeted criminal investigations of people like New York Attorney General Letitia James or former FBI director James Comey, or for refusing to support bogus non-prosecutions, like those of New York Mayor Eric Adams, for alleged bribery and campaign financial fraud, or Tom Homan, who was caught on videotape by undercover FBI agents taking $50,000 in a brown paper bag, just weeks before Trump appointed him border czar.

Individual v cultural cancellation

The “woke” or “politically correct” so-called radical left has absolutely nothing to do with cancel culture. On the contrary, so-called non-governmental or private cancellations have everything to do with philosophical values and legal practices that have over the past 60 years become socially and culturally sacrosanct.

But on the right, canceling individuals for repudiating post “separate but unequal” racist, sexist, homophobic, nativist, or pre-scientific laws, policies, or customs of the ancien regime, or for simply rejecting a return to the “good old days” of oppression and the pre-civil rights era, is consistent with the MAGA project to deny others the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

For the right under Trump, cancelling contemporary culture is about returning to an earlier, crueler, and darker age of white supremacy and Christian patriarchy.

The president’s contemporary top-down cultural suppression of other people’s human rights or basic dignity is fully rooted in his authoritarian regime — in the repression of some 300 Republican congressional eunuchs, in the cancellation of the right to democratic representation, or in the liar-in-chief’s failure to uphold his oath to the U.S. Constitution.

Donald Trump, who complained about cancel culture, has become our Canceller-in-Chief.

Still need persuading?

First, return to a speech by Trump at a conference held by Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA on June 23, 2020.

Following the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, on May 25, and in the wake of the largest protests in US history — against police brutality — Trump repeatedly referred to the “radical left.”


He began by giving a big “shout out“ to the audience for refusing “to kneel to the radical left,” which he said demanded “absolute conformity from every professor, researcher, reporter, journalist, corporation, entertainer, politician, campus speaker, and private citizen.”

He further maintained that the “radical left” was “waging war on the timeless American values like freedom of speech” and that anyone “who dares to speak truth is canceled, censored, de-platformed, fired, expelled, harassed, abused, boycotted, deprived of a livelihood, or even physically assaulted.”

And then, if you can stomach it, return here — to listen to Trump’s delusional remarks at the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Tuesday. Listen to his speech as both an irrational case for cancelling the UN, and a very lucid one for cancelling himself as well as MAGA.

Yet again, the president, a sociopathic leader and treasonous villain, has been busy lying about cancel culture, and emulating “the pot calling the kettle black.”


Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of criminology and criminal justice at Eastern Michigan University and the author of several award-winning books, including Criminology on Trump (2022) and its sequel, Indicting the 45th President: Boss Trump, the GOP, and What We Can Do About the Threat to American Democracy (2024). The third book in Barak’s trilogy, Regime Change, Authoritarian Treason, and the Outlaw-in-Chief: President Donald Trump’s Struggle to Kill U.S. Democracy & Realign American Global Power, will be published after the 2026 midterm election.
'We'll move it!' Trump threatens to relocate FIFA World Cup matches

Matthew Chapman
September 25, 2025
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump, in front of a painting of former U.S. President Ronald reagan, speaks during an event to announce that the Space Force Command will move from Colorado to Alabama, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 2, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

President Donald Trump told a group of reporters on Thursday that he is considering forcibly relocating 2026 World Cup matches out of cities if he believes they are "dangerous" — even though he is not in charge of FIFA and doesn't have the authority to relocate World Cup matches — and specifically mentioned Chicago as a potential example, even though Chicago is not scheduled to host any World Cup matches in the first place.

"If I think it's not safe, we're going to move it out of that city," said Trump. "If, like, the governor of Illinois, who is, look, you know, last week, between last week and the week before, 11 murders, and 38 people were shot. And he gets up and says, 'this is a very safe,' and then he says crime is better."

"The reason crime is better is because Kash [Patel] put, about five months ago, a whole team of FBI there to get ready for when we go in, and they've lowered it a little bit," he said. "You know, 20, 25 percent, which isn't good enough, but it's a good start. But that was only put there because they're preparing for us to go in. And they've done, by the way, they've done a good job. So then Pritzker gets up, 'We've lowered crime 25...' It's because the FBI was there."
"So, no, if any city we think is going to be even a little bit dangerous for the World Cup, or for the Olympics, you know, when they have Olympic overthrow, right, but for the World Cup in particular, because they're playing in so many cities, we won't allow it to go — we'll move it around a little," Trump continued. "But I hope that's not going to happen."

Trump has repeatedly cited the crime rate in Chicago — often wildly exaggerating it — as a possible pretext to sending in federal troops to keep order, much the way he did in Los Angeles to crack down on protests against his mass deportation policies.

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker has repeatedly condemned Trump's threats against his state's most populous city, and indicated he will strenuously oppose any military occupation of his state.