“This of course reflects Trump administration policy, which counters any focus on climate at international meetings,” said a US researcher and former diplomat.
The glaciers are seen as the floes melt due to global climate change in Antarctica on February 07, 2022. Turkish scientists, within the scope of the 6th National Antarctic Science Expedition, monitored the global climate change and followed the glaciers that provide the heat balance of the world and decrease every year.
(Photo by Sebnem Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Jon Queally
Jun 19, 2026
COMMON DREAMS
The Trump administration is under fire over its efforts to have any mention of the climate crisis removed from a scientific report, published this week, aimed at informing nations that are party to a global treaty designed to protect the Antarctic.
Details of the “diplomatic tensions” surrounding the report, which took place during a meeting in May with delegates from around the world focused on the Antarctic Treaty, were detailed by Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) correspondent Jano Gibson.
According to Gibson:
The report reveals that France took issue with the US’s suggestion not to use broad terms such as “climate change” and instead refer to “specific” environmental changes.
“France … expressed it had strong concern about the gradual disappearance of references to climate change in the work of the Committee [for Environmental Protection],” the report states.
“France emphasized that climate change was a reality affecting all countries, regardless of borders.
Claire Christian, executive director of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition, told ABC that there’s zero controversy within the scientific community that a changing climate due to global warming is having deep impacts on the Antarctic region.
“The evidence is clear: the Antarctic region is undergoing rapid climate change, and this is already having significant effects on planetary systems,” Christian said. “If we don’t reduce our carbon emissions rapidly, these effects will only become more severe and unpredictable.”
While a France warned that “refusing to even name climate change” would set “a dangerous precedent,” Evan Bloom, a former US diplomat and Antarctic researcher involved in international negotiations on the topic said the position taken by the US at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting was very much in keeping with the behavior and policies of President Donald Trump.
The US position, said Bloom, “shows how out of step the US is with most of the rest of the world on climate change. Yet, this of course reflects Trump administration policy, which counters any focus on climate at international meetings.”
‘Good News, But It’s a Low Bar’: Trump Backtracks on Plan to Kill Ocean Monitoring Program
“Trump is backing off from doing something incredibly stupid, so we celebrate.”
A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data collecting buoy is moored in the Indian Ocean.
(Photo by David Zimmerman/ NOAA)
Brad Reed
Jun 18, 2026
COMMON DREAMS
The Trump administration on Thursday backed off a widely criticized plan to dismantle a deep-sea monitoring system designed to provide crucial storm forecasting data while also tracking the health of coastal habitats and the impacts of the climate crisis on the world’s oceans.
In an announcement posted on its website, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) said it “will not proceed with further removal or descoping of equipment” from the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI), less than a month after it revealed plans to remove more than 900 instruments deployed along US coastlines.
‘Absolutely Crazy’: Horror as Trump Moves to Dismantle Crucial Ocean Monitoring System
NSF also said that it would continue planned maintenance operations on the remaining systems, while also creating plans to redeploy that Endurance Array, which is a set of long-term moorings set up in the Pacific Northwest, after it undergoes equipment servicing.
“NSF remains committed to ocean sciences,” the announcement concluded, “to responsible stewardship of its research infrastructure and to supporting the stakeholders that depend on it.”
The decision to end OOI drew bipartisan backlash in Congress, as the Republican-controlled US Senate on Wednesday passed a measure to block the administration from further removing ocean monitoring equipment.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who led the Senate effort to block the Trump administration’s OOI plans alongside Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), described the removal of ocean monitoring systems as “supreme stupidity” that would destroy “a vital source of climate data.”
The timing of NSF’s decision to dismantle the system was particularly controversial given concerns over planetary heating and the growing threat of extreme weather, especially as the return of El Niño this year is expected to unleash larger and more damaging meteorological events in the near future.
In response to Thursday’s announcement, the Democratic National Committee’s Environment and Climate Council described the reversal on OOI as a rare sensible decision for a Trump administration that has been overtly hostile to climate science.
“Good news. But it’s a low bar,” the council wrote in a social media post. “Trump is backing off from doing something incredibly stupid, so we celebrate.”
In an announcement posted on its website, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) said it “will not proceed with further removal or descoping of equipment” from the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI), less than a month after it revealed plans to remove more than 900 instruments deployed along US coastlines.
‘Absolutely Crazy’: Horror as Trump Moves to Dismantle Crucial Ocean Monitoring System
NSF also said that it would continue planned maintenance operations on the remaining systems, while also creating plans to redeploy that Endurance Array, which is a set of long-term moorings set up in the Pacific Northwest, after it undergoes equipment servicing.
“NSF remains committed to ocean sciences,” the announcement concluded, “to responsible stewardship of its research infrastructure and to supporting the stakeholders that depend on it.”
The decision to end OOI drew bipartisan backlash in Congress, as the Republican-controlled US Senate on Wednesday passed a measure to block the administration from further removing ocean monitoring equipment.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who led the Senate effort to block the Trump administration’s OOI plans alongside Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), described the removal of ocean monitoring systems as “supreme stupidity” that would destroy “a vital source of climate data.”
The timing of NSF’s decision to dismantle the system was particularly controversial given concerns over planetary heating and the growing threat of extreme weather, especially as the return of El Niño this year is expected to unleash larger and more damaging meteorological events in the near future.
In response to Thursday’s announcement, the Democratic National Committee’s Environment and Climate Council described the reversal on OOI as a rare sensible decision for a Trump administration that has been overtly hostile to climate science.
“Good news. But it’s a low bar,” the council wrote in a social media post. “Trump is backing off from doing something incredibly stupid, so we celebrate.”
No comments:
Post a Comment