EU Parliament awards Sakharov Prize to ICC in rebuke of US sanctions
The European Parliament has awarded the Sakharov Prize to the International Criminal Court in a show of support after the US imposed sanctions on the court. The abstention of the far-right Patriots for Europe group was decisive in breaking the deadlock over the final choice.
The European Parliament on Thursday awarded the International Criminal Court (ICC) the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, signalling opposition to US sanctions threatening the court’s work.
The annual prize recognises individuals and organisations defending human rights and fundamental freedoms. Past laureates include South African leader Nelson Mandela and Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny.
US President Donald Trump’s administration announced sanctions against the ICC on 9 October, following repeated criticism of its arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and its investigation into the conduct of US troops in Afghanistan.
“This is a message of hope and resistance sent to Donald Trump. We will not abandon the rule of law and international justice. We will stand with the ICC for as long as it takes,” said French MEP Chloé Ridel, who nominated the court.
Parliament’s political group leaders chose the ICC over two other shortlisted candidates: Tanzanian lawyer Tundu Lissu, who faces political persecution, and Iranian sisters Taraneh and Romina Rahimi, nominated on behalf of those persecuted by Iran’s authorities.
The Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group put forward the ICC and its officials, with other political groups eventually backing the nomination. The decision surprised some insiders, who had expected Lissu to win.
According to sources present at the meeting, the far-right Patriots for Europe (PfE) group played an instrumental role in determining the final outcome.
Initially, the European People’s Party (EPP) and the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) supported their candidate, Lissu.
Meanwhile, the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) had the backing of Renew Europe, the Greens/EFA and The Left in support of the ICC. PfE co-leader Kinga Gál, however, continued to advocate for Taraneh and Romina Rahimi.
These competing positions resulted in a deadlock, with neither candidate securing the majority required to win. Under Parliament’s rules, the impasse would have led to a runoff between the two candidates with the strongest support: Tundu Lissu and the ICC.
Gál ultimately prevented this outcome by abstaining, allowing the ICC’s supporters to secure a relative majority.
Last week, MEPs from across the political spectrum urged European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to protect the Netherlands-based court from US sanctions.
They called for the use of “all instruments at our disposal”, particularly the EU’s Blocking Statute, which shields European companies and individuals from the effects of certain foreign sanctions.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas described the threat of sanctions against the ICC as “not acceptable” on 9 October, reaffirming the bloc’s commitment to international law. The EU has yet to take concrete action.
Issued on: 21/10/2026 -
In an interview with FRANCE 24, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Navi Pillay described the US sanctions imposed on the International Criminal Court (ICC) hours after her award as "a shock" and "unacceptable". The South African judge also defended the UN commission of inquiry she chaired, which concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza: "We didn't come to that conclusion lightly." Rejecting claims that the ICC targets Africa, she said "the court is not selective".
READ MOREIsrael a rare dissenting voice as praise pours in for Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay
Just hours after Pillay was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the Trump administration imposed sweeping sanctions on the ICC, having already targeted the court's key personnel.
READ MOREInternational Criminal Court faces 'test of resilience' as US imposes sweeping sanctions
Speaking to FRANCE 24 from The Hague, the former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, who sat as a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, called the move "a violation of the international rule of law".
"It's unacceptable for politicians to interfere in the work of judges, in the judiciary," Pillay said, adding that she had travelled to The Hague to show "solidarity" with the ICC's staff.
No comments:
Post a Comment