Immigration Minister Diane Finley introduced Bill C-57 on Wednesday, which says foreigners applying to work in Canada should be rejected if they risk being humiliated, degraded or sexually exploited.
Like temporary foreign workers who have been killed or injured on the job in Alberta working for CNRL, or the Polish tradesmen who were ripped off by the oil patch in collusion with an Alberta College, or nannies, or farm workers. All these are cases of humiliation, degradation and in some cases sexual exploitation.
Humiliation and degradation is something our Prime Minister knows about first hand; Harper's Chef, Nanny, and Car Washer Fired
Wendy blogs that of course this law does nothing to stop the trafficking and exploitation of women....
By prohibiting the lawful entry of foreign women employed as exotic dancers, the Conservative government thinks it can avoid the embarrassment of propping up the exotic dancer market and pretend they’re doing something to help these women, but in reality, all this legislation will do is consign trafficked women to the most unregulated market of all – the underground market. By shifting from regulation to restriction the Conservative government is no longer going to be viewing trafficked women as victims but rather they will be viewed as illegal immigrants and as prostitutes, meaning that the trafficked woman will be criminalized, go to jail and most likely deported. This means that if a women is a victim abuse she will be less likely to reporter her abuser due to fear of being criminalized. And although employers and agents who employ foreign strippers will also be breaking the law, it is the women who will be at a greater risk since it is easier to deport illegal migrants than to successfully prosecute club owners or agents under criminal or immigration legislation.But it sure makes a nice bit of political theatre when you can claim the Liberals were promoting foreign strippers and you only want Canadian girls to be exploited in this unregulated non-unionized industry. The reality is this law is far broader in scope than just affecting strippers. And it is a reactionary law.
Citizenship and Immigration
Mrs. Joy Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul, CPC):Mr. Speaker, can the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration inform the House of the government's intention to help prevent vulnerable people coming to Canada from being exploited or abused?
Hon. Diane Finley (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, CPC):Mr. Speaker, I am proud to announce that later today I will table legislation to help prevent vulnerable foreign workers such as strippers from being exploited or abused.
The amendments will authorize the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to instruct immigration officers to deny work permits to foreign strippers.
The previous Liberal government gave blanket exemptions to foreign strippers to work in Canada despite warnings that they were vulnerable to forced prostitution and other exploitation.
Thanks to today's amendments, the good old days of Liberal strippergate will be a thing of the past.
This enactment amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to allow officers to refuse to authorize foreign nationals to work in Canada in cases where to give authorization would be contrary to public policy considerations that are specified in instructions given by the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration.
IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT
1. Paragraph 3(1)(h) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is replaced by the following:
Explanatory Notes
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Clause 1: Relevant portion of subsection 3(1):
3. (1) The objectives of this Act with respect to immigration are
...
(h) to protect the health and safety of Canadians and to maintain the security of Canadian society;
2. Section 30 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1):
Clause 2: New.
Authorization
(1.1) An officer shall, on application, authorize a foreign national to work or study in Canada if they meet the conditions set out in the regulations.
Instructions
(1.2) Despite subsection (1.1), the officer shall refuse to authorize the foreign national to work in Canada if, in the officer’s opinion, public policy considerations that are specified in the instructions given by the Minister justify such a refusal.
Instructions
Concurrence of second officer
(1.3) In applying subsection (1.2), any refusal to give authorization to work in Canada requires the concurrence of a second officer.
Confirmation
Purpose
(1.4) The instructions shall prescribe public policy considerations that aim to protect foreign nationals who are at risk of being subjected to humiliating or degrading treatment, including sexual exploitation.
SEE:Conservative Strip O Gram
Libertarian Challenge of Canada's Prostitution laws
Padrone Me Is This AlbertaComatose Citizenship and Immigration Canada
Return Of the Work Camps
New Meaning for Nanny State
Migration
Alberta's Free Market In Labour
The Labour Shortage Myth
AFL Agrees With Me
The Real Crime In Canada
Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
prostitutes,, sex-workers,, union,, labour,,libertarian, women, Canada, Supreme Court of Canada, crime,
strippers, Canada, labour, Conservatives, Russia, Israel, performance-art, visa, immigration,
migrant workers, immigrants, temporary workers, farm workers, Alberta, labour, labor, employment, slavery, nannies,
human-trafficking, women, exploitation, mail-order-brides, indentured-servitude, BillC49, traficking in women, Liberal, Conservative, Government, parliament, politics, feminism, StatusofWomen,
I agree with you and with Wendy's analysis. Scary to think that the law would only serve to move women through illegal channels and leave them open to criminalization for illegal statuses. Strange how the development abroad (and within our conuntry - e.g. Calgary's boom) that displaces these women and leaves them open to trafficking is never discussed.
ReplyDelete