Tuesday, March 31, 2026



Judge Rules Trump’s Order to End Funding for PBS, NPR Was an Illegal First Amendment Violation

Todd Spangler
Tue, March 31, 2026 


A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order last year to end funding for PBS and NPR public media violated the First Amendment.

In a ruling Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss of the District Court for D.C. said Trump’s executive order to cease funding for NPR and PBS is unlawful and unenforceable. The judge wrote that the First Amendment right to free speech “does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type.”

“It is difficult to conceive of clearer evidence that a government action is targeted at viewpoints that the President does not like and seeks to squelch,” Moss wrote.

Trump’s order defunding PBS and NPR “singles out two speakers and, on the basis of their speech, bars them from all federally funded programs… Although there are many lawful reasons that the government might decline to make ‘a valuable governmental benefit’ available to someone, punishing disfavored private speech is not one of them.”

Moss also noted that Trump’s order canceled federal funding for public media “without regard to whether the federal funds are used to pay for the nationwide interconnection systems, which serve as the technological backbones of public radio and television; to provide safety and security for journalists working in war zones; to support the emergency broadcast system; or to produce or distribute music, children’s or other educational programming, or documentaries.”

A copy of the ruling is available at this link

Moss was nominated to the bench by President Obama.

Variety has reached out the White House for comment.

Both NPR and PBS had sued Trump over his executive order suspending U.S. federal funding for public media. Trump’s order, issued May 1, 2025, alleged the public-media organizations engaged in “biased and partisan news coverage” and instructed the board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to “cease direct funding to NPR and PBS” to the “maximum extent allowed by law.”

CPB shut down in January 2026 after 58 years following the funding cuts. In July 2025, Congress approved Trump’s rescission package, eliminating $1.1 billion in funding for public broadcasting that had been approved for the next two years. After Congress approved the defunding of CPB, Trump celebrated in a post on Truth Social, writing that Congress had cut funding from “ATROCIOUS NPR AND PUBLIC BROADCASTING, WHERE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS A YEAR WERE WASTED. REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED DOING THIS FOR 40 YEARS, AND FAILED….BUT NO MORE. THIS IS BIG!!!”

In a statement about Tuesday’s ruling, PBS said, “We’re thrilled with today’s decision declaring the executive order unconstitutional. As we argued, and Judge Moss ruled, the executive order is textbook unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and retaliation, in violation of longstanding First Amendment principles. At PBS, we will continue to do what we’ve always done: serve our mission to educate and inspire all Americans as the nation’s most trusted media institution.”

Katherine Maher, president and CEO of NPR, said: “Today’s ruling is a decisive affirmation of the rights of a free and independent press — and a win for NPR, our network of stations, and our tens of millions of listeners nationwide. The court made clear that the government cannot use funding as a lever to influence or penalize the press, whether as a national news service or a local newsroom. Public media exists to serve the public interest — that of Americans — not that of any political agenda or elected official.”

Maher added that NPR and its member stations “will continue delivering independent, fact-based, high-quality reporting to communities across the United States, regardless of the administration of the day.”

Progressive Champion Avi Lewis Wins Leadership Race for Canada’s NDP, Vowing Left Party Will Come ‘Roaring Back’

“The NDP will start winning again because we will become that beacon to the 99%,” Lewis said.


Progressive activist Avi Lewis walks onstage at the New Democratic Party’s convention in Winnipeg, Manitoba, holding hands with his wife Naomi Klein, after being elected party leader on March 29, 2026.
(Photo from Avi Lewis for Leader)

Stephen Prager
Mar 30, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Progressive activist Avi Lewis is pledging to bring Canada’s New Democratic Party “out of the wilderness” after being decisively elected as its new leader on Sunday on the back of an ambitious, affordability-focused agenda aimed at winning back working-class voters.

Lewis, the grandson of one of the NDP’s cofounders, cruised to a resounding victory, earning 56% of the vote to take over leadership of the long-ailing left-wing party, which has bled members in recent years to both Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberals and Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives.

He was introduced at Sunday’s Winnipeg convention by his wife, the acclaimed author and activist Naomi Klein, who said her husband’s victory was an invitation for Canadians to “dream big once again” and renew the fight against corporate greed at a time when more than half of the population says they struggle to afford basic necessities.

Lewis has proposed a sweeping agenda of “public options” aimed at combating Canada’s affordability crisis, including publicly owned grocery stores and banks to compete with price-gouging corporate monopolies.

A scion of the party that helped to build Canada’s universal healthcare system—which covers hospital and physician care—he’s called for it to be expanded into a “head-to-toe” care system that guarantees dental, drugs, vision, hearing, and mental health services for all Canadians.

In order to pay for these programs and others—including public housing, green energy investment, and subsidized phone and internet plans—Lewis has campaigned to pass a wealth tax on the richest 1% of Canadians, who own nearly $1.25 trillion, almost as much as the bottom 80% of Canadians, according to a recent report by Oxfam Canada.

“This country is awash in wealth. We can have nice things,” Lewis asserted to a raucous crowd during his acceptance speech. “Banks made $70 billion in profits last year alone. Oil companies are expecting a new windfall in the tens of billions. Grocery baron Galen Weston alone is worth $20 billion.”

During his campaign, Lewis railed against tax cuts for wealthy Canadians passed by the Liberal government, which are projected to cost the government nearly $76 billion over five years and slash an estimated 57,000 public-sector jobs by 2028.

“It is time, far past time, to properly tax the billionaires and corporations that have been riding a tidal wave of profit,” Lewis said.

While he acknowledged that Carney is still largely popular in Canada, in large part due to his fiery denunciations of US President Donald Trump’s tariff war and threats to annex Canada, Lewis argued that the prime minister’s revulsion toward Trumpism is only skin-deep.

“I think when you connect the dots, his moves do not add up to the vision that Canadians truly want and deserve in this perilous moment,” he said. “Half a trillion dollars in a decade for weapons to make Canada a major arms exporter in a war-torn world. Slashing our cherished public services, sweeping aside indigenous rights... No regulations on AI and pipelines.”

“In the last federal election, Canadians voted to say no to Trump and Trumpism,” Lewis said. “What they’re getting instead is our government following the US into a future of wars, fossil fuels, austerity, and job-killing generative AI.”




Lewis will face a difficult task ahead in rebuilding the NDP from a disastrous loss of support under its previous leader, Jagmeet Singh, who stepped down from his post after the party suffered the worst defeat in its history during last April’s elections, dropping to just seven seats in Parliament—not even enough to be considered a “recognized” party.

The role of NDP leader is the highest office Lewis has held in his life, having run two failed campaigns for parliament in his native Vancouver in 2021 and 2025.

Though NDP currently sits at a distant third, with only about 7% support according to an Abacus poll from March, other polls show that their positions, including a wealth tax and expanding federal health coverage, are popular with the vast majority of voters across party lines.

Other polls show that Canadians, especially those with low incomes, increasingly view affordability and inequality as pressing issues, especially as Trump’s war against Iran has caused global energy shortages and price hikes.

“The NDP is coming back because we know that a thriving world is possible, and we know who is standing in our way, and there are way more of us than there are of them,” Lewis said. “The NDP will start winning again because we will become that beacon to the 99%.”


US allies 'furious' ​Trump left them 'holding the bag' on war they didn't want: analyst


Matthew Chapman
March 31, 2026
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump's latest posture to get out of the war he started in Iran without fixing global oil markets has allied nations infuriated, Washington Post foreign affairs correspondent David Ignatius told MS NOW's Katy Tur on Tuesday.

This comes as Trump considers dropping the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz as a condition for ceasing hostilities, which would essentially keep 20 percent of the world's global oil trade suspended.

"David, can I go back to the other threat that Donald Trump made, the one up top, which is that this is not his problem. The Strait is not my problem, it's the allies' problem. They don't — we don't even need oil from the Strait. We have it here. If you want your oil, go and get it. I broke it, you fix it," said Tur. "How are our allies reacting to that?"

"Well, they are furious," said Ignatius. "They feel that — that they didn't start this war off, and in many cases that they didn't support it. And now they're being left holding the bag.

"That said, the pain of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is going to be felt by all of our allies, by China, by Japan, and simply in their own self-interest, they need to get moving to try to facilitate some solution," said Ignatius. "If they don't, the future is going to be increasingly bleak for them economically."

In other words, he said, "At some point, anger at Donald Trump for having helped create the situation needs to give way to something more pragmatic, and I would expect that will happen soon."





‘Learn How to Fight for Yourself’: Trump Says U.K. and Others Should Go to Strait of Hormuz and 'Take' Oil

Olivia-Anne Cleary and Tiago Ventura
Tue, March 31, 2026 
TIME



FILE - Ships sail through the Arabian Gulf toward the Strait of Hormuz as the sun sets in the United Arab Emirates Monday, March 23, 2026. (AP Photo,)


President Donald Trump said nations that are struggling to get jet fuel due to Iran’s chokehold of the Strait of Hormuz should go to the vital waterway and “take” the oil.

“All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the U.S., we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just take it,” he said Tuesday morning.

Continuing his message to nations who refused, beyond defensive measures, to actively get involved with the Iran war, Trump warned: “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us.”

Trump went on to claim that Iran has “been, essentially, decimated” and that the “hard part” has been done by the U.S.

“Go get your own oil,” he concluded.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth echoed the President's sentiment during a Pentagon press briefing Monday morning, insisting that other nations should take greater responsibility for securing the Strait.

“There are countries around the world who ought to be prepared to step up on this critical waterway as well. It's not just the United States Navy,” he argued.

Taking aim at the U.K. efforts, in particular, he added: “Last time I checked, there was supposed to be a big, bad Royal Navy that could be prepared to do things like that as well.”

Hegseth said Trump is merely "pointing out this is an international waterway that we use less than most. In fact, dramatically less than most. So the world ought to pay attention to be prepared to stand up."

Soaring oil prices take a toll worldwide amid Iran war

The Trump Administration's messaging comes as high fuel prices and stockpile concerns are taking a toll worldwide.


Giddy Trump, 79, Posts Giant Explosion Video as Aides Cue Up Daily Destruction Footage

The U.K. is reportedly set to receive its last tanker of jet fuel from the Middle East this week, according to the Financial Times.

Korean Air is transitioning to emergency management mode in an effort to mitigate the impact of soaring jet fuel costs.

And consumers in the U.S. are also feeling the financial implications of the war, which is in its 32nd day.

According to price-tracking service GasBuddy and the American Automobile Association, for the first time since 2022, the national average retail price of gasoline crossed $4 per gallon. This marks an increase of more than $1 from before the Iran war began on Feb. 28.
Strikes rage on as Iran targets oil tanker after Trump's grave threat

U.S. and Iranian officials are in talks about potentially bringing an end to the war, yet strikes are continuing.

A Kuwait-flagged oil tanker anchored off the coast of Dubai was struck by Iranian missiles in the early hours of Tuesday.

According to local media, the Kuwait Petroleum Corporation said that the “Al-Salmi,” a large crude carrier, was “directly attacked by Iranian forces while positioned in the anchorage area of Dubai Port in the UAE.”

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center, run by the British military, also reported the strike, saying the vessel was 31 nautical miles (57 kilometers) northwest of Dubai.

The tanker was en route to Qingdao, China, according to MarineTraffic.com.

Maritime intelligence firm TankerTrackers.com said the ship was carrying around 1.2 million barrels of Saudi crude and 800,000 barrels of Kuwaiti crude, and had completed loading last month.

Iran’s military has not confirmed responsibility for the attack.

The attack came after Trump delivered a threat to Iran’s energy infrastructure and Kharg Island on Monday.

“Great progress” has been made in talks to end the war, Trump said, but he warned of grave action ahead if a “deal is not shortly reached” and if the vital Strait of Hormuz waterway “is not immediately open for business.”

Trump said the U.S. military action, if carried out, would be “in retribution for our many soldiers, and others, that Iran has butchered and killed over the old regime’s 47-year reign of terror.”

Is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz integral to a U.S.-Iran cease-fire deal?

Despite Trump’s repeated emphasis on unblocking the Strait—a key transit route between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman through which around a fifth of global oil production flows—the White House signaled later on Monday that ending the war does not depend on fully reopening the waterway.

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that ensuring safe passage for oil tankers is not one of the Administration’s “core objectives.”

“The full reopening of the Strait is something the Administration is working towards, but the core objectives of the operation have been clearly defined for the American people by the Commander in Chief,” Leavitt said.

When asked if securing the Strait of Hormuz is an essential objective of the military operation, Hegseth referred reporters to the President's Tuesday morning statement and reiterated the Trump Administration's stance that the Strait is "not just a United States of America problem."
Disgraced ex-GOP rep claims US has a secret 'alien hybrid breeding program'


Matthew Chapman
March 31, 2026 
RAW ST0RY

 



Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) (Photo: Gage Skidmore)​

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) made an eyebrow-raising claim on air with a far-right talk show host: the U.S. government is not only covering up the existence of extraterrestrials, but breeding them.

Gaetz told Benny Johnson that he received this information from an official briefing.

“I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army, that was briefing me on the locations of hybrid breeding programs where captured aliens were breeding with humans to create some hybrid race that could engage in intergalactic communication," said Gaetz, in a clip flagged by a social media channel following alien conspiracy theories. "An actual uniformed member of the United States Army briefed me on that.”

He went on to say that the humans who were "abducted from war zones" and even from "migrant caravans" were forced by the government to interbreed with space aliens and that crash sites of unidentified aerial phenomena often contain evidence of “non-human biologics.”

Gaetz did not provide evidence to substantiate that this conversation happened, and did not clarify why he didn't make this public while he was a member of Congress.

Gaetz was a firm ally of President Donald Trump in Congress and was the president's first choice to serve as attorney general during the transition. His nomination was derailed as congressional ethics committees uncovered fresh information about claims that Gaetz engaged in sexual misconduct with a minor, violated campaign finance law, and committed a number of other transgressions.

Gaetz has denied these allegations and was never charged with a crime, but was forced to step aside as a result of the investigation.




Trump throws Truth Social tantrum as White House ballroom makeover forced to stop

David Edwards
March 31, 2026 
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump visits a Ford production center in Dearborn, Michigan on Jan. 13, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

President Donald Trump lashed out at the National Trust after it successfully sued for a preliminary injunction that halted construction of his $400 million White House ballroom.

"The National Trust for Historic Preservation sues me for a Ballroom that is under budget, ahead of schedule, being built at no cost to the Taxpayer, and will be the finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World," the president complained in a Truth Social post on Tuesday. "I then get sued by them over the renovation of the dilapidated and structurally unsound former Kennedy Center, now, The Trump Kennedy Center... where all I am doing is fixing, cleaning, running, and 'sprucing up' a terribly maintained, for many years, Building, but a Building of potentially great importance."

Trump went on to complain that the "Radical Left Group of Lunatics" was not suing Fed Chairman Jerome Powell for restoring the Federal Reserve.

"Or, have they sued on Governor Gavin Newscum's 'RAILROAD TO NOWHERE' in California that is BILLIONS over Budget and, probably, will never open or be used," he ranted. "So, the White House Ballroom, and The Trump Kennedy Center, which are under budget, ahead of schedule, and will be among the most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World, gets sued by a group that was cut off by Government years ago, but all of the many DISASTERS in our Country are left alone to die. Doesn't make much sense, does it?"




'He deserves to pay a price': NYT editors appalled as Trump pardon spree unleashes mayhem

Nicole Charky-Chami
March 31, 2026 
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump talks to members of the media aboard Air Force One en route to Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on March 29, 2026. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz


The New York Times editorial board had a damning message on Tuesday for President Donald Trump and his decision to pardon about 1,500 Jan. 6 rioters who have since committed other crimes.

Unlike past presidents who have waited until their final days in office to issue potentially controversial pardons, Trump has done the opposite. And in doing so, he has created a major problem, the Times editorial board argued.

"President Trump has abandoned this approach. His self-serving pardons are so numerous that public attention cannot keep up with them. It is a version of the strategy that his former adviser Steve Bannon has described as 'flood the zone': Do so much so fast that people cannot follow the consequences," The Times editorial board explained.

Those repercussions have wreaked havoc on communities.

"The American public deserves to understand the mayhem that the Jan. 6 pardons have unleashed," The Times editorial board wrote. "Among the 12 serious recidivists whom we are aware of, four were in jail or prison at the time of the pardon, and they quickly went on to commit more crimes."

The group named and described multiple people associated with the riots at the nation's Capitol, detailing the crimes they committed both after their pardons and prior to them.

It warned Trump and Republicans to stay ready for midterms, when Americans will ultimately have the final response.

"How can the nation hold Mr. Trump accountable for the lawlessness that he has made possible? The only answer is public opinion and its most tangible manifestation: election results," The Times editorial board wrote.

"In this year’s midterms, he and the Republican Party he leads deserve to pay a political price for the pardons. Mr. Trump continues to lionize a violent attack on Congress carried out in his name — an attack that included threats to kill the vice president of the United States and physical assaults against police officers guarding the Capitol. In the aftermath of the attacks, one officer suffered a series of strokes and died, and four other officers died by suicide."
Trump's latest rant spells 'beginning of the end of the US': conservative commentator

Alexander Willis
March 31, 2026 
RAW STORY


Protesters kick a ball covered with a mask representing U.S. President Donald Trump while playing soccer matches on a major urban highway to protest against the reopening of Azteca Stadium, officially renamed Banorte Stadium, on the day of a friendly match between the national teams of Mexico and Portugal held to mark the stadium’s inauguration, as Mexico prepares for the 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, in Mexico City, Mexico, March 28, 2026.
REUTERS/Luis Cortes


A prominent conservative journalist and commentator was taken aback by President Donald Trump’s latest rant Tuesday morning, going as far as to say that the president’s remarks marked “the beginning of the end of the U.S. empire.”

Earlier on Tuesday, Trump erupted at the United Kingdom over its refusal to join the United States in its war against Iran. Writing on social media, Trump told the United Kingdom to “build up some delayed courage” and “take” control of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route where Iran has restricted access to U.S.-aligned vessels, and that the United States has been unable to re-open by itself.

Saagar Enjeti, a conservative journalist, commentator and podcast host, said Trump’s rant marked a major turning point for the United States.

“This unironically then is the beginning of the end of the US empire,” Saagar wrote Tuesday in a social media post on X to their more than 514,000 followers. “Militarily unable to collapse the Iranian regime from the air, sparking a global energy crisis for critical US allies and then telling them to go and fix the crisis we created.”

The U.S. war against Iran has reportedly sparked panic within the Trump administration as oil prices continue to surge and the administration’s war objectives appear increasingly out of reach.

While the Trump administration had initially sought to topple the Iranian government and prevent Iran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon, achieving such goals has gone on to become “unlikely,” according to U.S. and Israeli officials who spoke with The Washington Post, with re-opening the Strait of Hormuz – which was open to U.S.-aligned vessels prior to the war – emerging as the war’s new “paramount objective.”
Trump has reportedly moved to consider ending the war without re-opening the Strait of Hormuz, administration officials revealed, speaking on the condition of anonymity.


Trump admin has crossed the 'tipping point' where regimes often fail: expert

Robert Davis
March 30, 2026
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump walks as he heads to Marine One to travel to Ohio and Kentucky, from the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 11, 2026. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

President Donald Trump's administration just crossed a "tipping point" where other authoritarian regimes have failed, according to one expert.

Over the weekend, more than eight million people participated in the nationwide "No Kings" protest, one of the largest public demonstrations in U.S. history. The total number of demonstrators who attended the protests represents about 2.5% of the nation's population, which signaled to David Rothkopf, the former editor of Foreign Policy Magazine, that the Trump administration has reached the point of no return.

Rothkopf discussed the impact of the "No Kings" protest on a new episode of "The Daily Beast Podcast" with host Joanna Coles.

"Political scientists say once you get about 2.5% of the population out into the streets, that's a tipping point," Rothkopf said. "That's a sign that regimes like authoritarian regimes can start to fail. That's where we are. There were 3000 demonstrations, demonstrations on every continent."

Trump has faced significant criticism during his second term. Key scandals include allegations of insider trading involving Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth related to investments in defense contractors, questions about the Department of Justice's mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, and accusations that the FBI, under Director Kash Patel, is purchasing Americans' location data without proper oversight.

Additionally, the administration has faced criticism over its coordination of military strikes against Iran, alleged corruption involving federal contractors, selective enforcement of immigration laws, and concerns about conflicts of interest among appointed officials regarding federal contracts and policy decisions.




'Blindsided' Kristi Noem asks for 'prayers' after husband's cross-dressing scandal

David Edwards
March 31, 2026 
RAW STORY


Kristi Noem speaks during a roundtable on antifa at the White House. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein


Former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was reportedly "devastated" to learn that her husband, Bryon Noem, had an alleged fetish for cross-dressing.

A spokesperson responded to the New York Post after the Daily Mail reported that the former Trump official's husband was obsessed with a "bimbofication" fetish scene.

"Ms. Noem is devastated. The family was blindsided by this, and they ask for privacy and prayers at the time," her representative told the Post.

The Daily Mail's investigation uncovered "hundreds" of messages between Byron Noem and three women in the fetish scene. Photos obtained by the Mail showed him dressed as a woman with fake breasts.


Byron Noem did not deny the allegations of cross-dressing or sharing explicit messages in a conversation with the Mail. But he did deny sharing "indiscreet comments about his wife" that could have endangered national security by exposing her to blackmail threats.

"I deny the second part of that," he said.

Kristi Noem has allegedly had a years-long affair with her adviser, Corey Lewandowski, while married.



WAIT, WHAT?!

Justice Kagan 'signaled' to other states how to get around 8-1 ruling on anti-gay therapy

SCOTUS SUPPORTS CONVERSION THERAPY

Tom Boggioni
March 31, 2026 
RAW ST0RY



Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan (Photo by Evelyn Hockstein for Reuters)

Moments after the Supreme Court sided with a Christian counselor on Tuesday in her challenge to a Colorado law banning attempts to change a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity, MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin claimed Associate Justice Elena Kagan provided a road map for other states to avoid a similar fate.

In an 8-1 decision, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson providing the only dissent, the court ruled sided with Kaley Chiles and agreed Colorado’s law regulated speech, which led two of the liberal justices to concur.

However, as Rubin pointed out, Justice Kagan in her concurrence, provided guidance on how to write or rewrite similar laws that have a better chance of surviving a challenge.

“For anyone who is shocked at their 8-1 ruling, I suggest they take a look at Justice Kagan’s concurrence that I just had an opportunity to read,” Rubin told host Anna Cabrera.

"Justice Kagan says, if this were viewpoint neutral and instead just regulated a subject matter of speech that is forbidden, for example, in doctor's offices, that would be a much tougher call,” Rubin explained. "Justice Kagan may be signaling to other states that have a concern about things like conversion therapy.”

“There is a way potentially to do this that wouldn't trigger this 8-1 divide that you see among this court with offense here is that you are telling people of one viewpoint that they can't express it while expressly endorsing the other viewpoint as permissible within the space of talk therapy,” she elaborated. “For example, the state had argued that this form of therapy, conversion therapy, was conduct. It was a form of treatment versus being about free speech. Clearly, the court didn't buy that argument.”









































Spain condemns Israeli death penalty law as discriminatory against Palestinians

Spain condemns Israeli death penalty law as discriminatory against Palestinians
José Manuel Albares Bueno. / CC: MAUC (Saioa Hermosa Aguirre​)​​Facebook
By bnm Gulf bureau March 31, 2026

Spain has condemned a law passed by the Israeli parliament that introduces the death penalty in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, calling it "draconian" and discriminatory, the Spanish foreign ministry said in a statement on March 31.

Madrid said the law "enshrines legal inequality between people on an issue that directly affects the fundamental right to life" and described the discrimination against the Palestinian population as being "of the utmost gravity."

The Spanish government said the legislation expands the number of offences punishable by death and removes basic guarantees of due process.

Spain also objected to what it called the "illegal exercise of Israeli jurisdiction" in occupied Palestinian territory, describing the application of capital punishment there as "particularly serious."

"Spain reiterates its firm rejection of the death penalty in all cases and circumstances, considering it a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment that has no proven deterrent effect and causes irreparable harm in the event of a miscarriage of justice," the statement said.

The condemnation adds to growing friction between Madrid and the Israeli government. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has emerged as one of Europe's most vocal critics of Israeli military operations, having publicly refused US access to two Spanish military bases for strikes on Iran and describing the war as illegal.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed frustration at that decision, with some in Washington calling for sanctions against Spain.

Spain recognised the State of Palestine in May 2024 alongside Ireland and Norway, a move that drew sharp criticism from Israel at the time.