Showing posts sorted by date for query Sherritt. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Sherritt. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, February 26, 2024


Nickel faces existential moment with half of mines unprofitable

Bloomberg News | February 26, 2024 |

A nickel briquette. Image from Sherritt International

Many of the world’s biggest nickel mines are facing an increasingly bleak future as they wake up to an existential threat: a near limitless supply of low-cost metal from Indonesia.


With roughly half of all nickel operations unprofitable at recent prices, the bosses of the largest mining companies last week sounded a warning that there was little prospect of a recovery.



The potential collapse of nickel mining from Australia to New Caledonia comes at a time when western governments are scrambling to secure the supply chains needed to decarbonize the global economy. But in an ironic twist, Indonesia’s coal-fired nickel output is pricing out greener metal that’s so far failed to command a market premium.

Wresting control of strategic metals from China has become a focal point of Joe Biden’s administration. Yet while US officials have dashed around the world looking to strike deals for materials such as cobalt and copper, the heaviest reverse has come in Chinese-backed Indonesian nickel, a key component of electric vehicles.

Indonesia now accounts for more than half of world supply, with the potential to reach three-quarters of all production toward the end of the decade.



“There is a serious structural challenge as a result of Indonesian nickel,” said Duncan Wanblad, chief executive officer of Anglo American Plc, after his company took a $500 million writedown on its nickel business last week. “They don’t seem to be letting up anytime soon.”

Traditionally, nickel has been split into two categories: low grade for making stainless steel and high grade for batteries. A huge Indonesian expansion of low-grade production led to a surplus, and, crucially, processing innovations have allowed that glut to be refined into a high-quality product.

Commodity markets have always been susceptible to cyclical volatility, especially when sudden supply and demand imbalances get a push from wider macro upswings or downturns. But what’s happening in nickel right now is different, with the entire industry undergoing a structural shift that has upended forecasts and models.

For BHP Group, the world’s biggest miner, nickel is a rounding error, contributing mostly losses to profits that routinely break $30 billion a year. Yet in recent years the company has championed the metal, seeing it as a key growth market that will help offset its retreat from fossil fuels.

Instead it’s turned into a disaster.

This week CEO Mike Henry conceded that the company will have to make a decision on whether to shutter its flagship nickel business in Australia within the next few months. Having already written down the business’s value by $2.5 billion, Henry said he expects the market to remain in surplus until at least 2030.

That means the pain is likely just starting.

Macquarie Group Ltd. calculates that about 250,000 tons of annual production — equivalent to about 7% of the total — has been taken out of the market by closures, with another 190,000 of planned output delayed.

Combined with economic slowdowns in China and the US and the choppy adoption of EVs, nickel has been pummeled. The price fell 45% last year, and is currently hovering around $17,000 a ton. According to Macquarie, at $18,000 a ton 35% of production is unprofitable, while at $15,000 a ton that jumps to 75%.

Anglo’s CEO Wanblad, who is reviewing nearly all the company’s mines in bid to cut costs, said that he will give the miner’s nickel business time in the face of the Indonesian threat.

“Our nickel business will undergo a fulsome review in terms of holding its head above water and making a viable profit,” he said. “I’m not giving up on the guys to come up with a plan that might help them readjust themselves into a position where they can function effectively.”

Glencore Plc, which has already moved to shutter its nickel operations on the islands of New Caledonia, is one of the world’s biggest producers with sprawling businesses in Canada and Australia. At current prices, that business will make just $500 million this year, with CEO Gary Nagle expecting prices to remain depressed.

“We see continuing strong production growth out of Indonesia,” Nagle said. “We do not expect significant price recovery in the short to medium term.”

With more than half a decade of oversupply ahead, more mines are likely to close before things get better. Should the market finally rebalance, that will leave Indonesia and China with even more market share then they already have.

Still, Indonesia’s rapid expansion has drawn criticism. Much of its production comes from coal-powered energy, giving it higher emissions per ton than rival producers, and its rapid expansion is eroding rainforests.

With little prospect of a near term recovery, western miners are pinning their hopes on state aid in the short term and a push toward customers — such as carmakers — demanding “greener” nickel in the future and being willing to pay more for it.

BHP this week called for the London Metal Exchange to expand its responsible sourcing policy to include environmental due diligence, helping to differentiate production from Indonesian and Chinese supply.

Still, as conceded by Glencore, so far buyers of nickel are unwilling to pay more.

“Right now there is not much of a premium in the market,” Nagle said.

(By Thomas Biesheuvel)


Fortescue’s Forrest urges LME to separate ‘clean’ nickel contracts

Reuters | February 26, 2024 

Andrew Forrest. (Image by Mines and Money, Flickr).

The London Metal Exchange (LME) should classify its nickel contracts into “clean” and “dirty” ones to give customers more choice, Australian iron ore magnate Andrew Forrest said on Monday.


The comment by Forrest, chairman and founder of Fortescue Metals Group, is part of a push by miners and Australian lawmakers to save the country’s nickel industry after prices collapsed amid a jump in cheaper supplies from Indonesia.


Nickel, a key ingredient in electric vehicle batteries, is typically produced to higher environmental and regulatory standards in Australia than in Indonesia. That has Australian producers calling for a green premium.

“If you’ve got dirty nickel in your battery systems, then you want to know about that because you don’t want to propagate that and you want the choice to buy clean nickel if you can. So the London Metal Exchange must differentiate between clean and dirty,” Forrest told Australia’s national press club.

In an emailed response to Reuters, an LME spokesperson said the exchange “drives and supports the metals and mining industry on several sustainability measures to ensure transparency throughout the supply chain to consumers”.

The LME, the world’s biggest market for industrial metals, has linked up with German online platform Metalshub, which in 2022 developed a price index for class 1 nickel briquette premiums. Briquettes are solid forms of nickel obtained by compressing the metal’s powder or flakes.

“Low-carbon nickel can already be listed on Metalshub today and the transaction data supports identification of a credible ‘green premium’ to the LME price,” the spokesperson added.

Australia’s nickel industry is shedding hundreds of jobs. Forrest’s private investment arm Wyloo Metals said last month it would put its Western Australian nickel operations on care and maintenance at the end of May due to low prices. It bought those assets last year for $504 million.

(By Melanie Burton; Editing by Edwina Gibbs and Jan Harvey)

Saturday, March 25, 2023

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
JPMorgan’s mystery ‘nickel’ rocks: The hunt for clues begins with a kick

Bloomberg News | March 24, 2023 

Nickel briquettes. Image courtesy of Sherritt International Corp.

The revelation that about $2 million of “nickel” on the London Metal Exchange was actually just bags of stones has thrown a spotlight on the sprawling web of warehouses and metal stashes underpinning the billions of dollars of derivatives traded daily on the LME.


Over the past week, warehouse staff from Busan in South Korea to Genoa in Italy have rushed to check tens of thousands of two-ton bags of nickel – in some cases, by literally kicking them.

The LME advised warehouse operators to wear steel toe-capped boots for safety, one person who received the instructions said. The rule of thumb: If it hurts when you kick it, it’s probably nickel.

The mass inspection, which also included more carefully calibrated checks like weighing and scanning the bags, came after the LME last week announced it had discovered “irregularities” in nine nickel contracts. Bloomberg has reported that the contracts – now invalidated – belonged to JPMorgan Chase & Co. No other issues were found across the LME’s global network of warehouses, the exchange said on Thursday.

Attention will now turn to the question of how the bags of stones could have been bought and sold as nickel on the LME – long viewed by traders as the one place where they don’t need to second guess the contents of their cargoes.

The first sign of trouble came after some of the bags of “nickel” were bought from an LME-registered warehouse in Rotterdam by two trading companies, Trafigura Group and Stratton Metals. When the bags were delivered out, their weights didn’t match the paperwork. Inside, rather than nickel briquettes — which look like lumps of charcoal for barbecuing — the bags had stones instead.

When the rest of the Rotterdam warehouse was searched, the bags underlying nine LME contracts belonging to JPMorgan were also found to contain stones.

There are two possible explanations: either the bags were already full of stones when they were first delivered into Access World’s Rotterdam warehouse, or someone sneaked into the warehouse to steal the nickel.

Access World is leaning toward the second theory, according to people familiar with the matter, because it has a record of the material being weighed when it first entered the warehouse.

It’s far from the first time the metals industry has had to deal with scandals and theft, and nickel’s high value makes it a favorite of fraudsters. Just last month, Trafigura said it had been the victim of a “systematic fraud” whereby it spent some $600 million on cargoes of nickel that turned out not to contain the metal. (Trafigura has said the LME saga isn’t connected to its legal case over the alleged fraud.) In 2017, banks lost over $300 million after discovering fake warehouse receipts for nickel stored in Access World warehouses in Asia — in that case, outside of the LME’s network.

Metals traders joke about how the oldest known written complaint – on a clay tablet housed in the British Museum – details a deal gone wrong over substandard copper.

But in today’s world, the LME’s system is the one place where metal is assumed to be unquestionably safe. The exchange’s contracts, which are the global benchmark for industrial metals like copper, nickel and zinc, are backed by physical metal in the network of warehouses around the world.

While the vast majority of trades on the exchange are purely financial transactions involving hedge funds seeking to bet on the price of metals, or producers looking to hedge, anyone who holds a contract to expiry receives a parcel of metal in an LME-registered warehouse. The whole system relies on warehouse companies to vouch for the metal they have loaded in when they produce an LME “warrant” – a warehouse receipt that can be delivered against an LME contract.

“Elevated prices on base metals make them a natural target for fraud and theft,” said Simon Collins, former head of metals at Trafigura and the CEO of digital trading platform TradeCloud. “Commodity companies need to protect themselves via stringent procedures around people, processes and technology.”

Access World has said it believes the nine warrants suspended by the LME were an isolated case, “specific to one warehouse in Rotterdam.” A promotional video for the company’s facility in Rotterdam’s port area shows a brightly lit warehouse filled with stacks of shiny metal, as well as numerous security cameras.

One headache for investigators is that it’s far from clear when any nefarious activity took place: the material was first delivered into the Rotterdam warehouse several years ago, according to people familiar with the matter.

It may have gone undetected for years, because of a quirk specific to the nickel market. Unlike aluminum and copper, which are kept in neat stacks in warehouses, most of the nickel in the LME is in the form of briquettes in bags. Warehousing and shipping companies typically don’t look inside the bags, checking only that the seals haven’t been tampered with. They issue warehouse receipts on what is called a “said to contain” basis – meaning they cannot vouch for the contents.

The number of problem bags was small, affecting only a few dozen tons of nickel. But the news that just a few of the LME’s nickel contracts were compromised has led traders to reconsider the assumption that LME registered metal is always perfectly secure.

The price of nickel for immediate delivery plunged to the biggest discount to three-month futures in 15 years this week, in a sign that some traders were suddenly wary of taking delivery of LME nickel contracts.

Read More: Nickel price slumps as global production soars

For the LME, the warehouse issue represents yet another headache as it wades through the fallout of its last nickel crisis a year ago. It also comes as the exchange is finally preparing to resume regular trading hours in nickel — now scheduled for Monday — when the market will open during the Asian day for the first time since early March 2022.

(By Jack Farchy, Archie Hunter, Alfred Cang and Mark Burton)

Sunday, November 14, 2021

Saskatchewan province adds lithium to mining portfolio
Cecilia Jamasmie | November 12, 2021 | 

Saskatchewan produces a large volume of lithium-enriched brine water. 
(Image courtesy of Prairie Lithium.)

Canadian junior Prairie Lithium reached a milestone this week as it finished drilling the province of Saskatchewan’s first dedicated lithium well, which could make the battery metal the region’s third largest resource offering after potash and uranium.


The junior has been using proprietary technology to extract the sought-after battery metal from subsurface brine water since 2020, when the company’s first extraction tests began.

The salty underground water is then mixed with an ion exchange material in a tank, and is eventually converted into lithium chloride.

Provincial Energy and Resources Minister Bronwyn Eyre said lithium is “having a moment” right now, and the demand is expected to increase by five-fold by 2030.


The pilot project processing facility, in Emerald Park, successfully extracted 99.7% of lithium from the brine in “a matter of minutes,” Eyre said in the statement.

Eyre said this process is cleaner than the traditional way of extracting the mineral from hard rock and creates a sustainable use for the oil wells.

“Which is the beautiful irony, that oil field brine will power electric vehicles of the future. What’s not green about that?”

Saskatchewan’s Growth Plan supports the development of lithium exploration and extraction technologies, providing funding programs like the Saskatchewan Petroleum Innovation Initiative and Saskatchewan Advantage Innovation Fund — both used by Prairie Lithium.
Top battery player

The province currently produces uranium, potash and helium, but a total of 22 of the 31 minerals Canada has classified as “critical” have been discovered in Saskatchewan.

Experts have flagged the country’s potential to become a top player in the global EV battery market thanks to its lithium, graphite, nickel, cobalt, aluminum and manganese deposits.

Having most of key ingredients for advanced battery manufacturing and storage technology, however, is not enough. Without an ecosystem that allows for the creation of a market and industry for batteries, Canada could miss the chance to position itself as a top competitor in the global electric vehicles battery supply chain.

Value-adding, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence director Simon Moores has said, could see Canada gaining a big piece of the growing lithium-ion and EVs market.

Ottawa has taken steps to support the fledgling battery materials sector. The province of Quebec acquired last year 50% of troubled Nemaska Lithium (TSX: NMX) in a new joint venture with Livent Corp. and the Pallinghurst Group.

Australia’s Piedmont Lithium (ASX: PLL) and its 19%-owned Sayona Mining (ASX: SYA) completed in August the acquisition of Canada’s North American Lithium (NAL). The move was part of their plan to create a potential lithium production hub in the Abitibi region of Quebec.
Cobalt and nickel too

In Ontario, the federal and provincial governments offered a combined C$10 million ($8m) to help First Cobalt (TSX-V: FCC) develop a refinery, which would be the sole producer of refined cobalt in North America.

Cobalt is already, though not exclusively, processed in Canada. Sherritt International brings nickel and cobalt mixed sulphide intermediate from Cuba to Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta.

The plant has the capacity to produce up to 35,000 tonnes of nickel and 3,800 tonnes of cobalt (100% basis) per year.

Brazil’s Vale (NYSE: VALE) also produces refined cobalt as a by-product at nickel mines in Sudbury, Ontario.

The world’s largest miner, BHP, (ASX, LON, NYSE: BHP) is only days away of making official its acquisition of Noront Resources (TSX-V: NOT), which would give it access to the Eagle’s Nest nickel and copper deposit in the “Ring of Fire” in northern Ontario.

Sunday, November 07, 2021

Sherritt plans to expand Cuban nickel mine
Canadian Mining Journal Staff | November 4, 2021 

The Moa nickel mine in Cuba is a joint venture of Sherritt and General Nickel.
 Credit: Sherritt International

Sherritt International (TSX: S) is making plans to expand production and lengthen the life of the Moa nickel-cobalt mine in Cuba. Moa is a joint venture of Sherritt (50%) and General Nickel Co. of Cuba (50%).


The plan calls for a multi-phased approach, and work will include a new slurry preparation plant and expansion of other circuits at the mill. Existing equipment at Sherritt’s 100%-owned refinery in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, is part of the plan.

Moa is a lateritic nickel deposit mined by open pit methods. The ore is pressure acid leached on-site and then transported to the refinery in Canada. Finished nickel and cobalt are produced as well as a byproduct ammonium sulphate fertilizer.

The most recent 43-101 resource estimate at Moa was completed in 2019. At that time, the project had 111.9 million measured tonnes grading 1.03% nickel and 0.13% cobalt. The indicated portion was 46 million tonnes at 0.94% nickel and 0.12% cobalt. The inferred resource was 32.6 million tonnes grading 0.89% nickel and 0.13% cobalt.

(This article first appeared in the Canadian Mining Journal)

Thursday, September 09, 2021

ONTARIO

Noront receives official Wyloo offer, trumping BHP bid

The success of either bid will put high-profile Ring of Fire nickel asset in Australian hands.

Canadian Mining Journal Staff | September 7, 2021 

Noront Resources’ Esker camp in Ontario’s Ring of Fire. Credit: Noront Resources

Noront Resources (TSXV: NOT) has finally received a formal offer from Wyloo Resources – more than three months after Wyloo first floated a proposal to acquire the Ring of Fire junior in late May.


The C$0.70 per share offer trumps BHP’s (NYSE: BHP; LSE: BHP; ASX: BHP) friendly C$0.55 per share bid for Noront, made in late July.

It’s also more than double what Wyloo first proposed in May — C$0.315 per share.

The success of either bid will put high-profile Ring of Fire nickel asset in Australian hands.


Wyloo, a private company controlled by Australian billionaire Andrew Forrest, submitted the offer to Noront’s board on Friday, Sept. 3, after Noront invited it on Aug. 31 to make its proposal official. Wyloo says it wants to develop a “Future Metals” hub in Ontario, building on Noront’s Eagle’s Nest project, a high-grade nickel-copper-PGE deposit in the remote Ring of Fire region.

But even though it has now formally submitted its offer, the Perth-based company has continued to lob criticisms at Noront’s board. In its most recent statement, it implied that Noront’s directors and officers have continued to support BHP’s bid because under a lockup agreement signed with the giant Australia-based miner, they gain earlier access to certain options or share awards – a benefit with a gross monetary value of C$10 billion ($7.9bn) at BHP’s offer price. In addition, Wyloo doesn’t like the terms of a confidentiality agreement it has now entered into in order to conduct due diligence.


According to Noront’s July 27 support agreement with BHP, the junior can only provide confidential information to another party only if it signs a confidentiality agreement and agrees to a standstill provision. In the interest of Noront shareholders, the company says that BHP has agreed to waive the standstill requirement.

However, Wyloo says the confidentiality agreement still restricts its ability to communicate directly with shareholders.

For its part, Noront says the agreement and the terms of its support agreement with BHP are standard.

“Wyloo’s assertions that, among other things, the exercise of options and share awards by Noront officers and directors is unusual is simply incorrect,” the company said. “The acceleration provisions provided in the support agreement for the options and share awards are also customary for a transaction of this nature and are fully disclosed in the support agreement and other public filings relating to the proposed transaction with BHP.”

The lock-up agreements between BHP and Noront’s officers and directors will automatically terminate if Noront ends its support for the BHP bid in response to a higher offer.

Noront also confirmed it has no undisclosed agreements, understandings or incentives for its directors or officers in connection with the BHP offer.

Notably, while Wyloo is Noront’s biggest shareholder, the junior’s board did not support its proposal and adopted a poison pill provision to block it.

In its release on Aug. 30, Wyloo said it only made the initial offer because of Noront’s intention to strike a deal with BHP that it says undervalued the Ring of Fire assets.

“In April this year, we were deeply concerned when the Noront board proposed to farm out Noront’s exploration projects to BHP for only C$25 million,” said Luca Giacovazzi, head of Wyloo Metals. “Rather than consenting to such a transaction, we decided to make an offer to acquire the company. Our fears were justified when the Noront board completed a deeply discounted 5% placement to BHP, giving away a strategic toehold in the company to an obvious suitor.”

Giacovazzi added: “Since our initial proposal, we have listened to the feedback from shareholders who, like us, believe in the future of the Ring of Fire. We believe Noront shareholders deserve the chance to decide whether to join us in rebuilding the company, and not be pressured into selling all of their shares unless they want to.”

Noront has said that it sought a bid from BHP in its search for a superior offer to Wyloo’s initial proposal in May.

Wyloo, which now owns a 24.4% stake in Noront, asserts that given its holding and the superiority of its new offer to BHP’s bid, its proposal has a better chance of success. (The company can increase its interest to 37.2% by converting a $15 million convertible loan into common shares before the Sept. 30, 2021 maturity date.) However, the BHP bid only requires 50% of the shares not already owned by BHP to be tendered.
Details of the proposal

Wyloo says it will give shareholders the choice between retaining some or all of their shares in a revamped Noront, with a board of directors headed by Andrew Forrest, or taking the cash offer.

Other board members would include former Sherritt International CEO Ian Delaney; chairman and CEO of Queen’s Road Capital Investment Warren Gilman; and current Noront director Giacovazzi.

In a direct appeal to shareholders, Forrest pledged that Noront would make more progress under his leadership.

“After years of little progress, it’s understandable that shareholders have lost hope in Noront,” Forrest said in a statement. “I’ve personally been in the same position before. Seventeen years ago, people told me Fortescue’s deposits would never be mined because there was no infrastructure to access our projects. We proved those critics totally wrong and we want to do the same in the Ring of Fire. If shareholders share my view, that it’s impossible to place a value today on a new mining district with the immense potential of these assets, I invite them to hold on to their shares and come along for the ride.”

The company adds that it is also committed to creating business opportunities for First Nations communities, pointing to the success of its Billion Opportunities program created in 2011.

(This article first appeared in the Canadian Mining Journal)

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

CANADA & SHERRITT SHOULD DO THE SAME



3 Mexican ships taking fuel, medical aid and food to Cuba



MEXICO CITY (AP) — Two Mexican ships carrying food, fuel and medical supplies were sailing to Cuba on Tuesday and a third was getting ready to head there Wednesday, in what experts said was Mexico's biggest aid run for Cuba in almost three decades.

© Provided by The Canadian Press

The first ship left late Monday loaded with 100,000 barrels of diesel fuel that the Mexican government said would be used to provide power for Cuban hospitals.


A second ship operated by the Mexican navy left Tuesday, and the third ship will leave Wednesday. The Foreign Relations Department said those two ships are carrying oxygen tanks, needles and syringes as well as basic food items like powdered milk, cooking oil and beans.

The department described the shipments as “humanitarian assistance” to help Cuba weather the coronavirus pandemic.

Rafael Elias Rojas, a Cuban historian and professor at the College of Mexico, said that “this is a new phenomenon,” comparable only to Cuba's “special period” in the early 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union cut off the island's economic subsidies.

“There have been minor instances of aid during hurricane seasons, but the last big aid efforts of this scale or larger, were during the administration of (former Mexican president) Carlos Salinas de Gortari, when exchanges with Cuba increased significantly and when, as now, there was a deep economic crisis on the island," Rojas said.

Carlos Salinas de Gortari governed from 1988 to 1994. And until Mexico's democratic transition in 2000, Mexico's old ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party had a longstanding policy of opposing U.S. interference in Cuba, in part because Mexico feared outside criticism of its own less-than-democratic regime.

Lorena Ruano, a professor at Mexico's Center for Economic Research and Teaching, said Mexico's policy was “to defend the sovereignty of other countries, so that 'others won't criticize me.'”

President Andrés Manuel López Obrador is a fervent believer in that old policy, and last week he called Cuba an “example of resistance” and proposed that the entire country be declared a World Heritage site.

While much of Cuba seems stuck technologically in the middle of the last century, López Obrador did not appear to be speaking ironically when he proposed the world heritage designation, which is usually used by the United Nations to honor historical sites.

López Obrador praised Cuba’s ability to stand up to U.S. hostility since 1959, but did not mention recent street protests that were violently repressed by the Cuban government.

López Obrador has in the past stated his opposition to U.S. sanctions that limit commerce with the island, and said they should be ended.

On Thursday, the U.S. government tightened the sanctions on some Cuban officials over the suppression of the rare street protests earlier this month. The new sanctions target a Cuban official and a government special brigade that the United States says was involved in human rights abuses during the government crackdown.

Maria Verza, The Associated Press

Monday, February 01, 2021

Battery metals shortage threatens EV boom: 
Sherritt CEO

Jeff Lagerquist
Updated Mon., February 1, 202
Yahoo Finance Canada

Sherritt International (S.TO) is finally in the right place at the right time, according to the company’s departing CEO. The Canadian miner is counting on strong demand for electric vehicles to boost nickel prices as a global supply crunch looms for the key battery ingredient.

With automakers pouring billions into EV development, governments championing lofty climate goals, and more drivers looking to go electric, Sherritt is pinning its future on its open-pit Moa mine in Cuba. The joint-venture, half-owned by the Cuban government, sends mixed sulphides to Sherritt’s facility in Alberta to be refined into finished nickel and cobalt products.

“Things are all coming into alignment for us all at once after five, six, seven years of slogging in the wilderness of low nickel prices and dealing with debt,” David Pathe told Yahoo Finance Canada in an interview.

Board chair Richard Lapthorne called Pathe’s nine-years stint in the top job “as difficult to manage as any the company has faced in its over 90-year history” when Sherritt announced it was looking for new leadership last November.

He wasn’t kidding. Sherritt bought a mine in Madagascar in 2007 for $1.6 billion, just as nickel prices hit all-time highs. When Pathe took over as CEO in 2012, nickel consistently sold for about a third of peak prices, saddling the company with a money-losing project on top of hefty debts.

Pathe also led Sherritt as U.S. President Barack Obama took historic steps to normalize American-Cuban relations beginning in 2015. When Donald Trump took office in 2017, the U.S. reimposed restrictions, leaving the island nation without enough foreign currency to pay Sherritt’s utility arm. Trump recently put Cuba back on America’s list of state sponsors of terror, blocking newly-elected President Joe Biden from quickly reverting to Obama-era policies.

With Biden in the White House, a major balance sheet overhaul completed in August, and the costly Madagascar mine off the books, Sherritt is hunting for a successor to run the company as a tech-driven, low-cost nickel producer for the growing EV market.

EV batteries are expected to command as much as 37 per cent of global nickel production by 2040, according to the consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. (Photo by Brendon Thorne/Getty Images)

Lithium ‘supply crunch’ looms


While Sherritt’s total nickel output is a fraction of mining giants like Vale (VALE), Russia's Norilsk Nickel and BHP’s (BHP) operations in Western Australia, Pathe said the focus among its larger peers has been producing cheaper grades of the metal for making stainless steel.

EV batteries are expected to command as much as 37 per cent of global nickel production by 2040, according to the consulting firm Wood Mackenzie, up from just seven per cent in 2020. However, Sherritt estimates more than 70 per cent of the total nickel supply in 2025 will be lower quality, and therefore useless to the EV battery market.

“For some metals, the energy transition could be like the Chinese economic boom on steroids,” Wood Mackenzie analysts said in a report released in September, predicting nickel demand will increase by two-thirds by 2040.

Pathe points to years of weak prices to explain why no new significant class one nickel capacity has been added since the financial crisis. His shortage prediction follows a public plea from the highest-profile executive in the automotive world.

In July, Tesla (TSLA) boss Elon Musk said he would offer miners “a giant contract for a long period of time” if they can produce nickel in an environmentally sensitive way.

“We think there is a coming supply crunch, particularly on the class one nickel side,” Pathe said. “We’re now well positioned to take advantage of that. If battery demand comes anywhere close to meeting some of the projections for the next five, 10, 15 years, there simply isn’t enough class one nickel production to meet demand.”
Automakers wary of upstream investment

The long-awaited shift to electric vehicles is gaining traction as governments in Canada and the United States build EV adoption into their respective plans for net zero emissions by 2050.

In Canada, General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Fiat Chrysler (FCAU) each announced billion dollar investments to produce electric vehicles in Ontario in the last six months. Last week, GM said it plans to make all of its global operations and vehicles carbon neutral by 2040, and sell only zero-emissions vehicles by 2035.

The cash price for nickel on the London Metal Exchange pushed above US$18,300 per tonne in January, its highest level since February 2019, before retreating below US$18,000 to end the month. According to Wood Mackenzie, that’s too low to incentivize miners to produce enough battery metals for “a large number of EVs in a short space of time.”

Pathe expects automakers will forge closer ties with miners, either through long-term off-take contracts or financial stakes in companies, in order to lock in high-quality supply at a consistent price.

Wood Mackenzie notes Tesla, GM, Volkawagen (VOW.DE), Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC) already have partnerships with battery producers. However, they said the auto industry is wary of investing too far “upstream” in mining assets.

“We have noted OEMs like Tesla and BMW signing off-take deals for metals directly with mining companies. However, with the exception of a few small examples, OEMs are yet to take the plunge in terms of investing in mining,” Wood Mackenzie analysts wrote in a report. “The relative scarcity of battery raw materials, and the potential scramble for them, may warrant a change in attitude.”

Don DeMarco, an analyst at National Bank who covers Sherritt, said it’s “certainly possible” that miners and automakers will team up to maintain a steady supply of battery metals and hedge against volatile commodity prices. Pathe said Sherritt does not name its customers publicly for competitive reasons.

“What I will say is we’ve seen an uptick in investor interest, and the number of meeting requests,” he said. “I think you’ll see the automakers generally doing interesting things in the next two to three years.”

Sherritt’s Toronto-listed stock has climbed more than 150 per cent in the past six months, against a backdrop of improving nickel prices. However, shares remains more than 95 per cent below their all-time peak in 2007, around the time of the company’s ill-fated foray in Madagascar.




Editor's Edition: Biden is surrounded by 'climate hawks'

Joe Biden has not wasted any time in advancing his clean energy agenda. The 46th American president nixed the Keystone XL pipeline and rejoined the Paris Climate Accord on his first day in office. He also appointed a number climate hawks to key positions in his administration, signalling that green thinking will guide key departments such as treasury and transportation for the next four years. Tom Rand, managing partner at ArcTern Ventures, tells Yahoo Finance Canada that's it's hard to overstate how bullish a Biden White House is for clean tech investment. That sentiment has fuelled a stock market rally for companies in the electric vehicle and renewable energy sectors since the election, as well as warnings about a second clean technology bubble. In Canada, Rand expects lawmakers to be more willing to embrace climate-focused policies and support the clean tech sector with financial incentives as their counterparts south of the border increasingly link climate and the economy. He said investors would be wise to follow developments at the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for hints about how America plans to modernize its electricity grid, and which companies stand to benefit. Those developments, he said, often carry over to Canada.

Monday, May 25, 2020

Environmental advocates concerned by Alberta's new rules for coal mining

Alberta gov't quietly 'modernizes' coal policy

SILENCE IN DARKNESS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS 
IS THE MEANING OF QUIETLY

MODERNIZATION BEING OPEN FACE OPEN PIT STRIP MINING
THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS NEXT TO JASPER NATIONAL PARK
WHAT LUSCAR*** TRIED TO PUSH THROUGH TWO DECADES AGO!!!


https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/environmental-advocates-concerned-by-alberta-s-new-rules-for-coal-mining-1.4952655
NOW PLAYING

Environmentalists are angry that the Alberta government has changed a policy about open-pit coal mines without public consultation.

Published Sunday, May 24, 2020 

CTV.COM

TORONTO -- Upcoming changes to Alberta's coal regulations are expected to create hundreds of jobs in the province, but environmental advocates worry that the work will come at the expense of the ecosystem alongside the Rocky Mountains.

Alberta's energy ministry announced May 15 that the province's 44-year-old coal policy will be replaced June 1 by a new set of rules that bring coal producers in line with those looking to develop other commodities.

"Rescinding the outdated coal policy … will help attract new investment for an important industry and protect jobs for Albertans," Energy Minister Sonya Savage said in a press release announcing the changes.

Related Stories
Lawsuits likely if Biden cancels Keystone XL, Canadian observers warn

One of those changes opens up land that runs alongside the Rockies to developers of open-pit coal mines, though most of the mountains themselves remain protected.

Robin Campbell, the president of the Coal Association of Canada, told CTV News that he is aware of at least six companies looking at establishing coal mines in the Foothills region and sending the coal to Asia where it would be used in steel production.

According to Campbell, each mine would likely employ between 300 and 350 people.

"With the COVID-19 impact on the economy, this is an opportunity for our industry to help bring back economic activity into Alberta," he said.

Environmental advocates, however, are concerned about the impact that economic activity would have on the grizzly bears, caribou and other wild animals in the Foothills.

"Coal mines are known to be very destructive to these species," Shaun Fluker, an environmental law professor at the University of Calgary, told CTV News.

Fluker described the area opened up for coal-mine development as "a significant swath of public lands." It also contains rivers and other waterways.

"There's definitely going to be an impact on the sensitive wildlife populations that reside in the area," Nissa Petterson, a conservation specialist with the Alberta Wilderness Association, told CTV News.

In addition to the impacts on the ecosystem, Petterson said she is concerned that the changes were made without public consultation.


***Search Results


The Plans to Strip-Mine Coal in the Mountains - Alberta Views ...
https://albertaviews.ca › plans-strip-mine-coal-mountains

Jul 1, 2019 - In most places where metallurgical coal is mined, giant machines scrape off ... of Hinton when the nearby Luscar and Gregg River mines closed down. ... even bring clients to the mines instead of nearby Jasper National Park.

Fighting Frankenmine - Alberta Views - The Magazine for ...
https://albertaviews.ca › fighting-frankenmine

Jul 1, 2005 - Mountain Park coal would have been more expensive to mine because the ... At the same time, CRC announced the “Luscar Coal Income Fund,” a ... by the province and essential to grizzly bears from Jasper National Park.

Luscar | Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
https://www.business-humanrights.org › luscar

Groups Demand New Environmental Assessment of Massive Open-Pit Coal Mine on Doorstep of Jasper National Park. Author: Sierra Legal Defence Fund.


[PDF]
Luscar & Gregg River Mines Land Management Plan ...
https://open.alberta.ca › dataset › resource › download › 2013-luscargreggri...

Mar 4, 2013 - Provincial Park lies south of the Luscar and Gregg River Mine sites, ... Jasper National Park representatives; other coal mining companies; and.

[PDF]

Luscar and Gregg River Mines Land Management Plan
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca › files › mineralsmetals › files › pdf › rmd-rrm

Whitehorse Wildland Provincial Park lies south of ... and Jasper National Park (JNP) lies to the west of ... Modern open-pit coal mining in the Luscar and Gregg.

Just outside Jasper National Park, a coal mine threatens an ...
https://thenarwhal.ca › just-outside-jasper-national-park-a-coal-mine-threat...

Mar 1, 2019 - In the Rocky Mountains east of Jasper, a small Indigenous community has been praying that a coal-mine expansion won't impact its ability to ...
Missing: LUSCAR ‎| Must include: LUSCAR

Cardinal Divide - Alberta Wilderness Association
https://albertawilderness.ca › issues › wildlands › areas-of-concern › cardin...

The Cardinal Divide area is adjacent to the eastern side of Jasper National Park. ... Coal mining, coupled with unmanaged motorized recreation, has deterioration ... The Cheviot mine was meant to replace the older Luscar Mine and maintain ...

Fueling the fire over Cheviot | Ammsa.com
https://ammsa.com › publications › windspeaker › fueling-fire-over-cheviot

... the proposed Cheviot Mine project, located near the Jasper National Park. ... old Luscar mine, which will deplete its coal reserves within the next three years.

Experience Our Coal History by experiencetravelguides - issuu
https://issuu.com › experiencetravelguides › docs › experience_our_coal_h...

Mar 18, 2019 - Luscar. TECK COALCARDINAL RIVER MINE. Watson Creek. Leyland Cadomin ... Entrance. Brûlé. Jasper Jasper National National Park Park.

Sherritt fined $1-million for polluting incidents that impacted ...
https://www.theglobeandmail.com › news › national › article36476916

Oct 3, 2017 - Toronto-based Sherritt International Corp. operations are seen in this file ... Coal Valley Mine about 120 kilometres east of Jasper National Park ...

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Caldwells Bad Investment Advice

Theo Caldwell, yes the Caldwell Investment Banker,

- Theo Caldwell, president of Caldwell Asset Management, Inc., is an investment advisor in the United States and Canada.


in the National Pest whines about Canada's support for Cuba through both business investment and tourism. He makes spurious claims, unsubstantiated by a single fact, in his opinion piece.

He claims;
"It grates against our national character that Canada continues to do business with Cuba, thereby helping to prop up Fidel Castro's tyrannical regime."

Oh really. Which national character is that? Perhaps it grates the right wing supporters of the Reform/Alliance/Conservative Party, but they are far from the majority of Canadians. In fact one of the ironies is that Alberta, home of the Republican Lite Right Wing in Canada is also the source of the greatest trading partners with Cuba; Sherritt Mining.

As well Albertans travel to Cuba, as Caldwell further whines about claiming that Cubans will go to jail and be tortured if they visit Canada's Delta Hotel Resorts.

The tragic irony of sipping a Cuba Libre beside the pool in a hotel that native Cubans are forbidden from entering under pain of imprisonment, and within walking distance of one of Castro's torture chambers,

And Alberta farmers have long traded cattle and bull semen with current Cuban Leader Raul Castro, who has spent years cross breeding Latin American cattle with Alberta Angus.

He concludes;

"But whether or not the despot has gone on to his reward, passing power to his equally brutal brother Raul, tyranny is tyranny and Canada ought to have nothing to do with it."
Not good investment advice. One would expect better from a capitalist like Caldwell. But with his cold war mentality he is out in the cold on his anti-Cuba strategy.

Cuba Fund Has Biggest-Ever Surge After Castro Resigns (Update3)
Bloomberg
Castro's decision is ``a clear step towards the possibility of the US resuming trade with Cuba,'' Miami-based investor Thomas J. Herzfeld said during a ...
How to profit from Castro's resignation CNNMoney.com
Investing in a Post-Castro Cuba U.S. News & World Report
Equity revolution! Globe and Mail
Stocks with Cuban exposure rise on Castro resignation CBC News
Cuba: The Investment Play Conde Nast Portfolio



The real question here is does Caldwell live by the principles he espouses? Well not really. Sure his Caldwell Canada Mutual Fund (Caldwell Investment Mgmt Ltd.) isn't invested in Sherritt.

But they are invested in Talisman Energy, the big oil company that invested in Sudan known for promoting slavery, torture, etc. making Cuba look like a workers paradise. That offended the national character of Canadians who forced Talisman to divest of its investment in Sudan.

No thanks to Theo Caldwell or his investment fund.

Caldwell focuses on companies with at least $500 million in market capitalization, and his current Caldwell Canada holdings are predominantly mid-cap stocks. He will re-assess the portfolio at least once every quarter and expects the portfolio turnover to be 100% or higher.

He wants to be fully invested at all times and is comfortable having a stock holding of 5% to 10% of the portfolio. In terms of his sell discipline, "once stocks stop going up, we sell," he says.

Caldwell will make significant sector bets. Compared to the S&P/TSX Composite Index benchmark, as of Feb. 15, Caldwell Canada is close to 100% overweight in both the energy and the basic materials sectors, and "considerably" overweight in communications and media.

By comparison, the fund is underweight by more than 80% in financial services. "As an owner of the fund, you will be overweight in the sectors that have been doing the best," he says.

But Caldwell will limit his sector exposure. Overall, his portfolio won't hold more than double the index weight in any sector or 10%, whichever is greater.

He'll also avoid some well known "sin stocks." Along with the strategy of owning "high flyers," the focus is on companies that at their core are "deep down helping people," says Caldwell. "So we don't own alcohol, tobacco or gambling companies. I don't need to own them to make this work."


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

The Ugly Canadian

While Harper trumpeted Canada's generosity towards Tanzania, money promised by the previous Liberal Government and still not up to the actual commitment of 20% of the GDP, the real face of Canada was shown by the Mining companies that Harper had in tow with him. The same gang he had in tow with him when he visited Latin America earlier this year. For Harper 'aid' means investment opportunities.

DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA — The goal was to leave the image of a benevolent Canada investing in the health of poor Africans, but in the end it was another Canada, that of its globe-hopping mining companies, that stole the day.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper spent eight hours yesterday in this commercial centre on the Indian Ocean, visiting a school, lunching with Tanzania's President and announcing a $105-million contribution to a new health-care initiative in Africa and Asia.

Yet it was a 45-minute meeting with officials from a dozen Canadian investors, led by mining giant Barrick Gold Corp., that dominated Mr. Harper's news conference with President Jakaya Kikwete.

Thanks in large part to Barrick's three gold mines, Canada has emerged as Tanzania's largest foreign investor, prompting a resource boom that helped Tanzania record a 6.2-per-cent growth rate last year.

Yet the mining success has prompted allegations that royalties are too low and that Tanzania's people, still among the world's poorest, are not sharing adequately in the bonanza.

Adding to this is a nasty labour dispute at Barrick's Bulyanhulu gold mine, where 1,000 of the 1,900 workers have been on what the company calls an illegal strike for the past month.

A court hearing scheduled for yesterday, at which the union hoped to obtain an injunction to stop Barrick from hiring replacement workers, was postponed to today for reasons that were unclear.

Mr. Harper would not comment on the strike other than to say that he expects Canadian companies to "act responsibly within the laws of the land" when they are abroad. He praised Tanzania for creating a stable political and business environment that encourages Canadian companies to invest.

Mr. Kikwete was also diplomatic when the subject turned to Canada's investment in the mining industry and in particular the work of a committee created to advise the Tanzanian government on whether to change the royalty regime.

"We are not blaming the mining companies," the President said, noting that the companies are living within Tanzanian law.

He added that the goal of the review is to achieve a "win-win situation" for the companies and the government.

"We'd like to see more and more Canadian investment," Mr. Kikwete said.

It was the second time in recent months that Mr. Harper had met Barrick officials during an international trip. In July, he stopped off at Barrick's offices in Santiago, Chile, where the company is developing the massive Pascua Lama mining project in the Andes, despite protests from environmentalists.

Joan Kuyek, the national co-ordinator of MiningWatch, a group that critiques what it sees as irresponsible mining practices around the world, says Barrick's Tanzanian operation displaced thousands of small-scale miners and gives little back to Tanzania.

"If Mr. Harper met only with people chosen to have him meet with and didn't meet with the small-scale miners, didn't meet with the people who have to deal with the social and economic and environmental price that these mines are racking up in Tanzania, and didn't meet with their representatives, well I think that's pretty shocking," Ms. Kuyek said.



See:

Cold Gold

Afghanistan or Africa

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Vencap

Once upon a time the Alberta Government created a Venture Capital fund called Vencap Equities Ltd. It ran for just over a decade between 1982 and 1995.

And contrary to the myth that the fund was mismanaged that was not so, it simply was bad times in the market. Despite that it was highly successful and became Western Canada's largest venture capital fund. However the myth that it was a failure was perpetuated by the Alberta Government.


In terms of publicly-funded venture capital funds, Alberta’s experience has not been positive. Vencap was established by the Alberta government with funding of $240 million and the objective of investing in venture capital. Vencap experienced many of the same problems as LSVCCs – a lack of good investments and a reluctance to take risks. As a result, a relatively small percentage of Vencap’s equity ended up in new Alberta ventures. The Alberta Opportunity Company faced similar problems in operating a program to support investments in start-up knowledge-based industries.
As late as 2005, Dr. Allan Warrick of the University of Alberta continued to promote this myth that Vencap was a failure.

A small venture capital (Vencap) company was formed, with limited success.


Vencap Equities invested not just in Alberta but in High Tech and bio-tech in Canada and the U.S.

Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd.
10180-101st St., Ste. 1980
Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 3S4
(403)420-1171
Fax: (403)429-2541
Preferred Investment Size: $1,000,000 minimum. Investment Types: Start-up, first and second stage, control-block purchases, leveraged buyout, and mezzanine. Industry Preferences: Diversified. Geographic Preferences: Northwest, Rocky Mountain region, and Western Canada.


It often simply acted as an investor in a new project, back stopping a bigger corporate player in diversifying secondary and tertiary production, a long term goal of the Lougheed Government.

At Fort Saskatchewan near Edmonton, Dow
Chemical Canada Inc. extracted salt brines for the
manufacture of chloralkali and, at Lindberg, The
Canadian Salt Company Limited produced fine
vacuum pan salt. Near Bruderheim, two companies,
CXY Chemicals Canada Ltd. Partnership and
Albchem Industries, operated solution mines to produce
sodium chlorate used mostly for pulp bleaching
in the prairie provinces and western Canada. CXY
Chemicals Canada Ltd. Partnership (formerly known
as Canadian Oxy Ltd.) is planning a 30% expansion
of its chlorate production facility to be completed by
mid-1996. This increase will be achieved by increasing
the capacity of the equipment.
Albchem Industries was created by Sherritt Gordon and Vencap. CXY is the Canadian branch of Occidental Petroleum. Armand Hammer's company which VP Al Gore and his family has a long history with.

Vencap had more than a passing interest in the construction industry in Alberta during the first boom. Donald A. Carlson ,who owns Carlson Construction, was Chairman of the Vencap Board. Former Premier Peter Lougheed joined the Board of Carlson Construction after he retired.

At the same time the Alberta government was passing legislation to create non-union merit shops in Construction in order to bust the Building Trades Unions, Vencap had shares in the Construction industry.


Stuart Olson Construction Ltd., according to their solicitor, originally was engaged in employing union members on union jobsites. The last three years, however, Stuart Olson Construction Ltd. divested itself of employees covered under Certificate Nos. 21-75, 89-82 and 114-84.

The Company currently employs no employees at the present time.

The two major shareholders of Stuart Olson Construction Ltd. are Allen S. Olson who owns 99% and Vencap Equities who owns 1% of the Company. Counsel for the Employer states that the Employer currently holds property and assets which include buildings and equipment. In effect, Stuart Olson Construction Ltd. has become a holding company.
Vencap acted as a key investment that would allow Stuart Olson to go private, and claim to be go between, allowing it to contract out to non-union labour. Thus the nineties begin with the smashing of the construction trades unions to be followed with the smashing of the public sector unions. By then Vencap was sold.


Within Alberta, the provincial government moved away from becoming directly involved in the marketplace the early 1990’s and withdrew its direct financial involvement in the development of emerging industry sectors and specific firms. Venture capital functions carried by the Alberta Opportunity Company were withdrawn; the assets of VenCap were sold. A policy of no direct loans or loan guarantees to specific businesses was adopted by Alberta.
Yet it still made money.Despite the governments Big Lie that it was a failure. In fact as Dr. Michael Percy, Dean of the U of A Business School, points out they were one of several crucial pools of capital that helped build Alberta's secondary and tertiary businesses such as the embryonic Hi-Tech and Bio-Tech industry here. Which relies on a trilateral integration between Universities, corporations and the government to this day.

Performance of High-Technology Firms in a Peripheral Resource-Based Economy: Alberta, Canada

A young high-technology base is reflected further in the small size of the labor force although three out of four firms created jobs between 1980 and 1984. Marketing was a key area of performance identified by respondent firms as companies attempted to diversify away from local markets. Overall, the systematic policies of support by the Alberta government were found to assist the growth of the high-tech industry.


The AgBiotech Bulletin Volume 2 Issue 1  January/February 1994

Biostar Raises $10.9M

Biostar Inc., a Saskatchewan company which specializes in the
development of animal and human vaccines, has raised $10.9
million in equity. The funds were assembled through a syndicate
led by MDS Health Ventures of Toronto.

The investment will be used to establish an advanced product and
manufacturing facility in Saskatoon and to finance new product
development. Once the plant is in operation in 1994, Biostar
will be able to produce genetically engineered health products
and components for global markets.

The company markets three vaccines through its wholly owned
subsidiary Biowest Inc. The new plant will allow the company to
double its production levels. Current sales are valued at
$500,000. Steve Acres, Biostar president, anticipates that
within the next five to six years sales will reach $20 million.

Dr. Murray McLaughlin said that the equity investment in Biostar
was an affirmation of the strength of the Saskatoon agbiotech
community. "Biostar received the first funding assistance ever
provided by Ag-West. Our investment of just over $800,000 in
1989 has helped facilitate a major Canadian venture. The Ag-West
board is extremely gratified by the performance of Biostar in a
highly competitive market." It is Ag-West's role to fill the gap
between the research phase of development and commercialization.

The recent $10.9 million investment comes from MDS Health
Ventures, Health Care and Biotechnology Venture Fund, the
Saskatchewan Government Growth Fund, the International Centre for
Agriculture Science and Technology (ICAST), Working Ventures
Canadian Fund, Vencap Equities Alberta, Federal Business
Development Bank (FBDB) and CIC Industrial Interests.
For further information contact Steve Acres (306) 966-7473.


January 10, 1997

NeuroMotion Case Study

Tom Rice, acting CEO of NeuroMotion Inc., was anticipating a problem. He had
heard that NeuroMotion, a new medical device company, might receive only half
of the $6 million financing it had planned for. He called Business Manager Tricia
Cisakowski and Chief Financial Officer Christine Stacey into his office to help
develop a new strategy to deal with this potential setback.

Assuming full financing of $6 million, their strategy for penetrating the market
was an aggressive plan involving the commercialization of all of NeuroMotion’s
products in rapid succession. The products were the Glove, the WalkAid, and
the Tremor Control Cuff. Decreasing risk was a key strategy in the formation of
NeuroMotion. Increasing the number of product offerings increased the
probability that the company would generate significant sales, which made it a
more attractive investment opportunity.

Tom Rice, Ph.D. A business professional with over 24 years experience as an
executive, consultant, investor and researcher in the medical products industry.
He also has considerable experience as a consultant for start-up companies.
Rice brought substantial venture capital contacts to NeuroMotion through his
involvement in Vencap, a venture capital fund. He was employed as a part-time
CEO for approximately three, then became full time. He was a de facto MDS
appointee, who had verbally agreed to a three month contract with NeuroMotion.
He operates out of Edmonton and Minneapolis-St. Paul.

And then Klein got elected and since his government was not in the business of business, that is of making money, Vencap was caught up in the privatization frenzy of the nineties. Klein tossed the baby out with bathwater and sold it.

It was then gulped up by Charles Schwartz's private equity investment firm; Onex Corporation. Talk about a nice chunk of change.

Onex
also purchased Vencap Equities Alberta, Ltd., a promising venture capital fund located in western Canada.

The Onex Corporation of Toronto said yesterday that it planned to acquire Vencap Equities Alberta Inc. for $256 million (Canadian), or $187 million (United States), including the payment of $144 million (Canadian) in Vencap debt. Onex said it would buy all the shares of Vencap -- including the 30.5 percent stake in stock options the Alberta government holds -- for $8.50 (Canadian) a share. Onex, which owns interests in airline catering, food-distribution and delivery businesses, will also pay off Vencap's outstanding loan to the Alberta government. Vencap's stock reached a record high of $8.125 before closing at $7.875, up 37.5 cents, in trading on the Alberta Stock Exchange. Onex's stock was up 12.5 cents, to $14.125, in Toronto.

Vencap was sold off at fire sale prices, just like the provinces Liquor Stores were, benefiting its corporate board and not taxpayers. The supposed debt of Vencap was actually what it had invested in the market. In other words capital awaiting interest. Otherwise Onex would not have been interested.

Klein was on the band wagon that the province was in debt. So a valuable investment instrument was seen as being in debt, which it wasn't it just had outstanding investments in the market, so it was sold.

The Province of Alberta (the "Province") has made it known both to Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. ("Vencap") and publicly that it wishes to dispose of its interests in Vencap. Those interests (the "Alberta Investment") consist of a loan in outstanding principal amount of $199,988,000.00, one (1) special share and an option to acquire up to an additional 3,999,999 special shares at a price of $1.00 per share.

In order to effectively market the Alberta Investment the Province requires access to certain information from Vencap which has not heretofore been made public.

There could be significant benefits to Vencap and its shareholders in having the Province's loan paid out or purchased either by Vencap or some other party and in having the Province's special share and option dealt with at the same time.

Vencap would likely want the repeal of the Vencap Equities Alberta Act as part of any resolution of the Alberta Investment.

Thus there are significant material benefits to be gained by both parties through Vencap and the Province cooperating in the resolution of these issues.



Those that sat on its board brag today about its success before it was gutted by the Klein revolution. Former Vencap director Derek Mather notes one of his achievements as;

Helped to create a new Western based venture capital Company, the largest fund of its kind in Canada and, together with a team of professional executives built a portfolio of venture investments worth over $100 million.
And another board member, Peter van der Velden, notes in his corporate CV that Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd, was; arguably one of Canada's most successful venture capital firms

This is from the SEC report on the take over of Vencap by Onex in 1995.
Vencap                                              

Vencap is an Alberta, Canada corporation. Vencap is a value-added
private equity investor, operating in western Canada, the Pacific Northwest and
the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. Vencap purchases significant and
influential equity interests in selected high-growth companies, builds these
companies to positions of market leadership andgenerates a return on investment
either through profitable exit or by generating ongoing sustainable income.

The address of the principal business and principal offices of Vencap is Suite 1980,
10180 101st Street N.W., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 3S4.
Information relating to the directors and executive officers of Vencap
is set forth on Schedule A hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Directors and Executive Officers of
Vencap, Inc.

("Vencap") · Download Table


PRESENT PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATION OR
NAME BUSINESS ADDRESS EMPLOYMENT
---- ---------------- -----------------


Ian T. Morris Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President, Chief
Edmonton, Alberta, Financial Officer and
Canada T5J 3S4 Secretary

William R. McKenzie Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

David E. Stitt Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

Oleh S. Hnatiuk Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

Frank L. Stack Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

Mark Hilson 161 Bay Street Director, Vice-
P.O. Box 700 President of Onex
Toronto, Ontario, Corporation
Canada M5J 2S1

Anthony Munk 161 Bay Street Director, Vice-
P.O. Box 700 President of Onex
Toronto, Ontario, Corporation
Canada M5J 2S1

Donald Carlson Carlson Development Corp. Director
Suite 1420, 9915 108th Street
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5K 2G8

Vahan Koloian Polar Capital Corp. Director,
13th Floor
President and Partner
350 Bay Street
of Polar Capital Corporation,
Toronto, Ontario a merchant banking firm
Canada M5H 2S6


Onex

Onex is an Ontario, Canada corporation. It is a diversified company
that operates through autonomous subsidiaries, associated companies and
strategic partnerships. The address of the principal business and principal
offices of Onex is 161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 700, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5J
2S1.

Information relating to the directors and executive officers of Onex is set
forth on Schedule B hereto which is incorporated herein by reference. Onex is
the sole shareholder of Vencap Acquisition Holdings Inc. ("Vencap Holdings").
Vencap Holdings is an Ontario, Canada corporation which was formed to acquire
and hold the outstanding securities of Vencap and was one of the parties that
filed the Schedule 13D to which this amendment relates. Subsequently, Vencap
Holdings transferred the shares it owned in Vencap to affiliates of Onex. Onex
is the indirect beneficial owner of approximately 90% of the shares of Vencap.
The TSX lists the following as being on the Vencap Board of Directors.


Board of Directors
Name Position
Daryl Seaman *Director of the Board
Donald A. Carlson *Director of the Board
Donald John Taylor *Director of the Board
Fred Sparrow *Director of the Board
George Norman Wildgoose *Director of the Board
James Gregory Greenough *Director of the Board
John Edward Barry *Director of the Board
John Thomas Ferguson *Director of the Board
John Robert Mccaig *Director of the Board
John Howard Nodwell *Director of the Board
John Denison Wood *Director of the Board
John Brian Zaozirny *Director of the Board
Peter Parkin Macdonnell *Director of the Board
Robert Bertram Church *Director of the Board
Robert John Elliott *Director of the Board
Robert Alexander Slator *Director of the Board


But lo and behold if Albertans are still paying for it. Despite selling Vencap off at fire sale prices the Alberta government holds loans made to Vencap,thirty years later, from the Heritage Trust Fund, which appear in the 2007 provincial budget on page 62 under Loans and Advances.

December 2000: All of the loans made to provinces from 1977 to 1982 have been paid back on time and without any missed payments. The only project loans left on the Heritage Fund books are Vencap and Ridley Grain Ltd. for a total of $98.8 million, which represents 0.8% percent of the Heritage Fund's total portfolio.


Apparently despite the sale of Vencap and all its assets at a profit it is still on the government's books as an outstanding loan for a measly $2 million dollars, pennies really, which was never paid back. Which is curious if you consider that Onex took on all of Vencaps debt. Why is this still on the books?

Perhaps its because the directors who profited from the sale of Vencap did not owe us, the taxpayer investors, any fiduciary responsibility. After all they were pals of the government and insiders all. An embarrassment of riches were gotten except by the people of Alberta.

Fiduciary Duties to Shareholders
Tongue v. Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. (1994) AB
Similar facts to Source Data, but Alberta takes different approach.
A secretly offers to buy out V shares on the condition that V buys out T first. T would have been able to command a higher price if he had known about negotiations with A. T signs waiver of claims to future profits from the re-sale of the shares. V director sells shares to A at 3x the price.
· Court finds that T did not sign the waiver being fully informed. V should have disclosed the negotiations with A.
· There was a close relationship between the shareholders.
· As a result there was a duty to disclose the negotiations with A.
· V is forced to disgorge profits
· This is the opposite finding of the Ontario position in Source Data, hence the law is unsettled in Canada.

On the other hand, fiduciary duties have been developed by the courts. It is true that Canadian corporate law statutes and the Civil Code of Québec have generally codified fiduciary and care duties but this codification does not appear to have affected or been intended to affect their development. If Canadian courts expand the category of persons to whom directors owe fiduciary duties (as other common law jurisdictions have done), they are presumably responding to a concern about corporate governance of corporations.

Canadian authorities, following the New Zealand decision Coleman v. Myers,
[1977] 2 N.Z.L.R. 225 (C.A.), have already suggested that the directors may owe parallel fiduciary duties to shareholders in some circumstances: see Tongue v. Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd (1994), 14 B.L.R. (2d) 50 (Alta. Q.B.). In Tongue, at page 85, the Court held: "There is no general fiduciary duty that arises between a director and shareholders simply because of that relationship: something more must be present before a fiduciary duty arises."


Onex is around today thanks to Alberta taxpayers while the original Vencap board members have been sitting pretty ever since. The whole Vencap debacle smells funny.

So lets look at how Vencaps Directors did out of the deal. Vencap benefited the Directors whose fiduciary interest was to themselves and not the taxpayers. An example of the benefits of Vencap management being an integrated board of Directors.

As we shall see.

BANYAN CAPITAL PARTNERS is an institutionally funded growth capital firm headquartered in Vancouver, B.C., with offices in Calgary and Seattle. We invest in or buy well-managed, successful middle-market companies located primarily in western Canada and the northwestern United States.

Banyan, through its two funds, has $140 million in committed capital under management. Our investor base includes two of Canada's largest pension funds, one of the largest financial institutions in the United States, a multi-billion dollar Japanese trading company and Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group, Canada's fourth largest independent money management firm.

David Stitt
Managing Director

David joined Banyan at its inception in 1999. Prior to Banyan, he spent 13 years at Vencap, Inc. and its predecessor, Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd., then western Canada's largest investment company which invested approximately $300 million in 84 company , as Vice President. He has been a director of Coinstar since 1995.

Frank Stack
Managing Director

Frank joined Banyan in November of 2001. Prior to joining Banyan, he spent three years with privately owned Vencap, Inc., where he played a lead role in maximizing the value of a portfolio of 34 companies. The wind-up of Vencap, Inc. led to shareholders receiving $154 million on an investment of $25 million. Prior to Vencap, Inc. Frank spent two years with publicly owned Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. where he led or co-led investments in four companies in the consumer products and technology sectors which generated a 29% return ($21 million). Prior to Vencap, Frank was a director with the merchant banking group of US-based GATX Capital Corporation and spent a number of years with the investment banking groups of Salomon Brothers, Inc. and Citibank N.A. Frank has a B.Comm. from the University of Alberta and an MBA from Wharton. He is a past director of eight private and public companies and is currently a director of Q'Max Solutions Inc.

R.A. (Sandy) Slator who was another insider was the CFO and then CEO of Vencap. And has done well for himself since it was sold. PWA was the Alberta Airline that was part of Lougheed's diversification plan. The Tories created PWA to expand air operations to the North for the Tar Sands. PWA bought up smaller airlines, and the government sweetened the deals such as with Time Air, by expanding municipal airports for PWA planes.

Sandy Slator graduated as a Chartered Accountant in 1970 articling with the firm of Clarkson Gordon & Co. (now Ernst & Young) in Winnipeg, Manitoba. In 1973, Sandy joined Byers Transport Limited, a large western Canadian based truck transportation company, as Chief Financial Officer and 18 months later, led a management buy out of the Company from the then owner, Pacific Western Airlines. He assumed the role of President and Chief Executive Officer on the successful takeover, and in 1979 he sold the Company to Laidlaw Inc. Sandy remained as President and CEO until May 1982. In 1983 Sandy joined Vencap Equities as its second employee and as Chief Financial Officer. He became President and Chief Executive Officer of Vencap in 1989 and served in that role until Vencap's sale to Onex Corporation in 1996. As a venture capitalist, Sandy also served a three-year term as President of the Canadian Venture Capital Association. After a few years of retirement and golf, Sandy joined PTI Group Inc. as President and Chief Executive Officer in January of 2000. Sandy led the merger of PTI Group Inc. with three other U.S. based companies, with the combined group going public on the New York Stock Exchange in February of 2001, under the name of Oil States International Inc. Since then he has been Vice President of Well Site Services, PTI Group Inc. is North America's leading integrated supplier of lodging and food services to remote locations. PTI serves 35,000 meals and houses 11,000 people per day at its remote site locations throughout the world. Sandy has served on numerous corporate boards and is very involved in community related activities. He currently serves as Vice-Chair of the Edmonton Space and Science Centre Foundation, and was Chairman of the Centre's recently completed $14 million fund raising campaign.
He was on
the Steering Committee for The Alberta Deal Generator and its joint venture partner organizations (TEC Edmonton and Calgary Technologies Inc.)
A major player in bio-technology in Canada is another former member of the Vencap board.

Robert B. Church, PhD, BSc, MSc – Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary

Robert B. Church is President of Church Livestock Consultants Ltd. and Professor Emeritus of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Calgary. He is a past President of the Calgary Exhibition and Stampede and has served on the Board of Directors of several companies, including Connaught Laboratories Ltd., Vencap Equities Ltd., Biostar Inc. and Ciba-Geigy Ltd. He is currently on the Board of AVAC Ltd., CV Technologies Inc., and is the founding Chairman of the Board of the Alberta Science and Research Authority and is currently Chairman Emeritus. Dr. Church was a founding member of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and has been a member of the Board of the Medical Research Council of Canada and of the Alberta Research Council. He has been a founder and/or advisor of a number of start-up high technology companies, including Alberta Livestock Transplants Ltd. (1971) through to GangaGen Inc. (2004), as well as a member of the Investment Committees of the Boards of Vencap Equities Ltd. and AVAC Ltd. Through his numerous activities, Dr. Church has over thirty years experience representing investments in high technology start-up companies of well over $50 million. In 2000, Dr. Church was appointed to the Order of Canada, this country’s highest honour for lifetime achievement.


And speaking of old boy clubs AVAC is one. Dr. Church and Sandy Slator sit on its board.

AVAC is truly a made in Alberta innovation…a unique private, not-for-profit company that invests in research initiatives and early stage commercial businesses that expand Alberta's value-added industry, with a particular focus on the agrivalue™, renewable resource, ICT, life sciences and other industrial technology sectors.


Ever the player in high tech and high finance Dr.Church was appointed to the board of Trustees of the joint provincial federal National Institute for Nanotechnology at its inception in 2005. And he sits on the Ontario Biotechnology Commercialization Centre Fund Advisory Committee.

In sum, the biotech industry has formidable and effective representation
within the traditional lobby sector. Yet, while these groups have
had great success in controlling government, they are less capable of
reaching the public. For this task, they have developed an intricate web
of hybrid lobby groups.

One of the most influential hybrid groups has been the National
Biotechnology Advisory Committee (NBAC), which was established as
part of the first National Biotechnology Strategy to bring business leaders
and scientists involved or interested in biotech into the federal policy-
making process. NBAC consisted mainly of industry representatives
or scientists from public institutions with personal commercial interests
in biotech. Twelve of the 19 members of the 1998 NBAC were from
industry and the consistency of NBAC over the years is striking. Seven
members of the 1998 NBAC were NBAC members prior to 1992.
It put forward the idea of a Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Council,
which would manage a “National Conversation” whose central goal
would be “the development of a socio-ethical framework for public policy
decision-making.”194 That year, as part of the Canadian
Biotechnology Strategy, the government morphed NBAC into the
Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee, with an expanded range
of members — maintaining the biotech community’s dominance but
decreasing the number of representatives directly from industry. CBAC
is administered by the Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat within
Industry Canada. Whereas each NBAC was convened by the government
at key times to develop biotech industrial strategies, the CBAC
facilitates an already established strategy. It reports to the
Biotechnology Ministers Co-ordinating Committee, advising them on
how to deal effectively with sensitive issues, and, at the same time,
engages with the public to provide the semblance of consultation.

Industry’s influence over CBAC is more indirect, yet still significant. The
linkages are there but more removed. For instance, the CBAC website’s
biography of its chair, Alan Naimark, lists his academic positions, but
does not mention that he’s a member of the Board of Directors of the
Winnipeg-based biopharmaceutical company Medicure Inc.195
Naimark’s also been on the Board of Directors of the Canadian
Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) since 1987 and owns, controls or
directs 4,174 shares in the company.196 CIBC is a leading investor in
biotechnology in Canada and its World Markets venture capital fund
for biotechnology and pharmaceuticals has “one of the broadest and
deepest of any financial institution, with current coverage of over 45
biotechnology companies and 35 specialty pharmaceutical
companies.”197 Similarly, the biography of CBAC member Robert
Church that is available on the web site provides a comprehensive listing
of his awards and service to academia and government, but does
not mention that he has served on the Board of Directors of several
biotech companies, including Connaught, Biostar, and Ciba Geigy, or
that he is the founder/advisor to “a number of start-up high technology
companies, including Alberta Livestock Transplants Ltd. (1971) through
to Neurospheres Ltd. (1990), as well as a member of the Investment
Committees of the Boards of Vencap Equities Ltd. and AVAC Ltd.” His
biography on another web site, that of the Board of Directors of the
Canadian Science and Technology Growth Fund, claims: “Through his
numerous activites, Dr. Church has over sixteen years experience representing
investments in high technology start-up companies of well over
$50 million.”198


Another company that is a who's who of Alberta politicians including Jim Dinning, former Calgary Mayor Al Duer and former MP Jim Gouk is Rocky Mountain Vacations. Whose CEO is a former Vencap board member.

MICHAEL PHILLIPS (Chairman)
Michael Phillips is retired as Senior Vice-President, Investments of GrowthWorks Capital Ltd., which manages the Working Opportunity Fund in British Columbia, Canada. The Working Opportunity Fund is a uniquely Canadian form of financial institution dedicated to providing risk capital to a wide range of entrepreneurial business in B.C.

Prior to joining GrowthWorks Capital Ltd., Mr. Phillips spent over twenty years with financial and venture capital businesses such as Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. and Business Development Bank.

Mr. Phillips is currently a director on the boards of nine Canadian companies including Armstrong Group (owners and operators of Rocky Mountaineer Vacations) where he has served as a director since 1991 and as Chairman since 1998.

Mr. Phillips resides in Vancouver, Canada.

It was Jim Dinning, as Treasurer of Alberta, under Ralph Klein, who put Vencap up for sale. He and other insiders and former politicians have benefited ever since. Because when the Ralph Revolution of privatization and contracting out began it was too benefit insiders as well as pals of the government.

Here are a few more of the successful Directors who were on the Vencap Board. Based on their insider knowledge from Vencap they have gone on to profit in the area of venture capital investments in bio-tech, high tech, oil field supplies and support services, all the things Vencap was invested in.


Elson McDougald, Director

Mr. McDougald is the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Western Lakota Energy Services Inc. He founded Laredo Drilling Ltd. and was the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Tetonka Drilling Inc. Mr. McDougald has been a director of Alberta Treasury Branches and Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. He is currently a member of the board of directors of Phoenix Technology Services Inc. and its Income Trust; Phoenix Technology Income Fund ("Phoenix"), CCR Technologies Ltd. ,and Decision Dynamics Technology Ltd.

Derek Mather

Derek assisted in organizing the first AceTech Symposium in 1993 and, shortly thereafter, was appointed AceTech's Executive Director, a post he held until his retirement from the AceTech management group in 1999."

A graduate in Business from McGill University in 1954, Derek's career has included several years with the Investment Department of the Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada in Montreal and London, England, followed by a career in venture capital, first with Canadian Enterprise Development Corp.(CED), which he helped to create, and then as founding President and CEO of Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. in Edmonton.

While with CED, Derek was appointed President and CEO of a troubled investment, Westmills Carpets Ltd. of Calgary, which he assisted to return to profitable operations."

Derek is currently a Principal of the Osborne Group, Canada's leading firm of interim executives. As well he serves Science World of BC as a member of its Equity Committee and is a Partner of BC Technology Social Venture Partners. In 2002 he was appointed a director of CityXpress Corp.

Derek enjoys working with the managements of rapidly growing technology companies where his skills and experience can add value.

Peter van der Velden, B.Sc., M.Sc., M.B.A.,

is the President and CEO of MDS Capital. Throughout his career Peter has sought to leverage his entrepreneurial drive, academic background, and business experiences to help talented entrepreneurs build outstanding businesses. He started in the venture capital industry in 1988 with Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd, and from there took on the role of Vice President, Business Development at a venture capital backed drug delivery development company where he led their international licensing initiatives, established their subsidiary operations in Australian was instrumental in raising more that $70 million in private and public equity, as the company evolved to become a TSE 300 listed company. His experience also includes, four years as a partner at a Canadian merchant bank, a short time as a partner at a public equity investment bank, and four years as the founding partner of a leading Canadian private equity investment bank.

Peter holds B.Sc. honours and M.Sc. (Pathology) degrees from the Queen's University at Kingston, and an M.B.A. in finance and policy from the Schulich School of Business.

Oleh Hnatiuk

CCR Technologies Ltd. (TSX: CRL), a technology solutions company focused on the purification of process chemicals and sweetening of sour gas, has appointed Oleh Hnatiuk as its new President & CEO. Hnatiuk was formerly President & CEO of University Technologies International Inc. (The University of Calgary technology transfer agency) and Senior Vice President, Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. www.reclaim.com

Graeme R. Percy, CD, P.Eng., General Manager & COO World Oil Tools

World Oil Tools Inc. is a Canadian based manufacturer and supplier of high technology inflatable products to the oil and gas sector.

In 1984 a move from Oakville, Ontario to Edmonton, Alberta and a
new job at Vencap Equities Alberta, Ltd. took place recently
for Graeme R. Percy, BASc’69 (MEng, McGill)


Dr. William A. Cochrane OC, MD, FRCPC, FACP, DABP, D.Sc. (hon), LLD (hon)

During his career, Dr. Cochrane has shared his leadership with a range of organizations, from the National Biotechnology Advisory Committee, the Alberta Research Council, the Alberta Economic Development Authority and the Alberta Science and Research Authority, to private sector ventures such as Vencap Equities Alberta, Oncolytics Biotech, Q.S.V. Biologics and Resverlogix Biotech Inc. His extensive contributions to the non-profit sector include service to the Ronald McDonald Children's Charities Foundation, the Canada/China Child Health Foundation, the Calgary Rotary Club and the Banff Centre.

Vasogen Inc.

William A. Cochrane +,  OC, MD Chairman of the Board  February 1995
Calgary, Alberta and a Director of the Company and Healthcare Consultant

Dr. Cochrane acted as Chairman of Vasogen's Board of Directors from 1995
until March 2001. He also serves on the boards of Andre Wines, Fox Energy Corp.,
Medicure Inc., Nucleus Bioscience, Pheromone Sciences Corp., and StressGen
Biotech. For ten years, Dr. Cochrane served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Connaught Laboratories and was a senior advisor to Vencap Equities
Alberta. He is a past-Chairman of the National Biotechnology Advisory Committee
and was the first Dean of Medicine of the University of Calgary Medical School.
His academic career culminated in his appointment as President and
Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calgary. He has served as Deputy Minister
of Health Services with the Government of Alberta and is currently an
international investment consultant in the area of health products and services.




And when David Stitt and Derek Mather met via Vencap. Stitt was 'Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Westmills Carpet Ltd., a regional carpet manufacturer located in western Canada.' The carpet manufacturer that was going under that fellow Vencap Director Derek Mather rescued through his private equity company.


Vencap was the largest pool of capital in Western Canada, comparable to OMERS and the the Teachers Pension Fund in Ontario and the Labour Fund; Solidarity in Quebec. It was investing in bio-tech and high tech, as well as well head service operations, and it made money. After the sale those who sat on its board benefited by investing in exactly these same sectors. The Klein government panicked and sold the golden goose for the price of the egg.


A decade later after selling Vencap, the Alberta government is looking at creating a pool of capital from Public Sector Pension Funds under its control merged with the Heritage Trust Fund, to be called AIM, for the purposes of generating venture capital.

At March 31, 2007, Alberta had about $45 billion in financial assets that are
invested in short-term, medium-term and long-term investments. The
investment strategies for these assets depend on the objectives of the funds.
In 2007-08, the new Alberta Investment Management Corporation will be
established to manage about $40 billion of these assets along with about
$30 billion in assets of public sector pensions and the Workers'
Compensation Board.

In 2007-08, investment income is estimated to be $2.5 billion (excludes
public sector pensions and Workers' Compensation Board). This is a
decrease of $601 million, or 19.4%, from 2006-07, primarily due to lower
expected returns of the Heritage Fund and other endowment funds. In 2006,
investments in the Heritage Fund and endowments benefited from strong
equity markets. Over the next three years, it is expected that the growth in
equity markets will be closer to historic levels.


Wait a minute isn't that Vencap all over again?
Jamais Vu!

A government-funded investment pool would provide critically needed financial backing to emerging enterprises and commercializing technology in Calgary and Alberta -- which suffer from an energy-centric investment community -- according to a report obtained by the Herald.

"There's an opportunity to leverage a government position in an equity capital market into a broader opportunity for growth of Alberta-based companies," said Calgary Economic Development director of research Adam Legge, who prepared the report, which will be issued later this week. "We have a real opportunity for Calgary to become Canada's centre of capital."

The 70-page report recommends the province examine the benefits of a so-called fund of funds -- government money injected into a range of venture investment funds -- to provide venture capital for companies and technology outside of oil and gas that may have difficulty attracting investors.

Masters noted that Alberta produces about 15 per cent of Canada's GDP, but receives two to three per cent of the country's venture capital. "It's an environment where we're behind and we need to make some changes."

Under the Ralph Klein regime, the province forcefully exited the venture capital area by liquidating its interest in a venture capital fund, Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. -- which was sold in 1995 to Onex Corp. of Toronto for more than $170 million -- and closing the venture capital arm of Alberta Opportunity Co. "There was a nuclear winter after that," said Masters.



SEE:

Workers Want Tax Credits NOT Tax Cuts


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
,