Sunday, November 14, 2021

Standoff between Cuban government and activists begins ahead of march
Carmen Sesin 
 51 mins ago

A standoff began Sunday between Cuba’s communist-run government and young activists who have been calling for a peaceful march for change Monday.

State security since early Sunday has surrounded the home of Yunior García, an artist who has emerged as one of the country’s leading activists and called for islandwide protests Monday. Foreign credentialed media were kept several hundred feet away.

García, 39, an artist and playwright, had said he would march alone, dressed in white and holding a white rose, at 3 p.m. Sunday to represent those who wouldn’t be able to Monday, but he was prevented from doing so. Instead, he showed the white rose, a symbol of peace, out his window

.
© Provided by NBC News Opposition activist Yunior Garcia Aguilera holds a white flower outside the window of his home in Havana on Nov. 14, 2021. (Ramon Espinosa / AP)

Outside García’s building, pro-government Cubans gathered since the morning shouting pro-Fidel Castro chants with music and dancing, scenes that were tweeted by activists. They also hung a giant Cuban flag over part of the building García lives in, partly blocking his window. He put a sign outside his house that said, "Mi casa está bloqueada" ("my house is blocked").

In Miami, home to the largest concentration of Cubans who have fled the island, a car caravan and march were held Sunday in support of those on the island. Solidarity rallies are planned around the world Monday.

García said in a Facebook Live post Sunday that it is his “human and constitutional right to walk as a free citizen on a street, carrying a white rose," adding, "But apparently not even that are they willing to allow.”

“We are living very ugly days in Cuba. Unfortunately, we are returning to the worst times,” said García, adding that from his window he saw credentialed journalists being expelled outside his building. “In the last few years we have seen how the violence increases, how the language of hate increases, how the discrimination increases and how that ideological apartheid increases.”

He said Cuba is a “tyranny” and called on Cubans to civically and peacefully put aside the hate and learn to conquer a country that really “belongs to all of us without excluding anyone.”

Some Cubans heeded García's call to clap at 3 p.m. “for us” and “for the people of Cuba,” and several of them shared the experience on social media.

García launched a Facebook group for political debate called Archipelago after historic anti-government protests on July 11. It has named the event Monday the “Civic March for Change.”

State-run television has dedicated programming to García in recent weeks, accusing him of being financed by the U.S. The government, which banned Monday’s march, has incessantly accused the U.S. of trying to destabilize the country.

The State Department called on the government in a statement Sunday to respect Cubans’ rights and urged it to “reject violence, and instead, embrace this historic opportunity to listen to the voices of their people.”

Late Saturday, authorities revoked the media credentials of five journalists working for the Spanish news agency EFE. The European Union asked Cuban authorities Sunday for “clarifications,” while Spain’s foreign minister summoned Cuba’s top diplomat in Madrid requesting explanations. Cuban authorities have returned two of the credentials so far.

The protests have put Cuba’s government on high alert.

A Cuban columnist for The Washington Post, Abraham Jiménez, tweeted Sunday that state security agents told him he was under house arrest as he tried to take out his garbage.

Independent journalists throughout the island also reported being under house arrest Monday.

The Committee to Protect Journalists said it is following the situation involving independent media and demanded respect for journalists that “resists censorship and harassment.”
Former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn calls for one religion in America
mkeith@insider.com (Morgan Keith) 

© Provided by Business Insider Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to former President Donald Trump, speaks to attendees as he endorses New York City mayoral candidate Fernando Mateo during a campaign event on Thursday, June 3, 2021, in Staten Island, N.Y. AP Photo/Eduardo Munoz Alvarez

Michael Flynn recently spoke about his Christian faith to refute QAnon claims that he worships Satan.

Flynn spoke at the "ReAwaken America" tour, which featured other Trump loyalists and anti-vaxxers.

Roger Stone, Mike Lindell, and Lin Wood are all participating as speakers on the tour.


At a three-day conference in San Antonio, Texas, for the "ReAwaken America" tour, former national security adviser and keynote speaker Michael Flynn called for Christianity to become the singular religion of the United States.

"If we are going to have one nation under God, which we must, we have to have one religion. One nation under God, and one religion under God," said Flynn, who recently talked about his Christian faith in an effort to refute QAnon claims that he worships Satan.

At the conference, Flynn also discussed former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, who was indicted by a federal grand jury for refusing to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol riot. Flynn called the indictment an "abuse of freedom of speech."

Flynn also said he has taped a segment for "Tucker Carlson Tonight" on what he calls the "insurrection crucifixion," comparing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Pontius Pilate, the man who ordered the crucifixion of Jesus in the Bible.

"This is the crucifixion of our First Amendment freedom to speak, freedom to peacefully assemble. It's unbelievable," Flynn said at the conference on Friday.

The "ReAwaken America" tour features Flynn, other Trump loyalists, and anti-vaxx doctors, including Stella Immanuel and Scott Jensen, who have a history of spreading disinformation about the 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Other Trump allies participating as speakers for the tour include Roger Stone, Mike Lindell, and Lin Wood.

Flynn also has a history of propagating conspiracy theories, such as COVID-19 vaccines being added to salad dressing, and previously claimed that COVID-19 was fabricated to distract from the 2020 election.

He served as the Trump administration's national security adviser and was pardoned in 2020 after pleading guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his communications with Russia.




















Historical Highlights

The Sedition Act of 1798

July 10, 1798
The Sedition Act of 1798Image courtesy of Library of CongressAn unpopular President, John Adams faced increased scrutiny over the signing of the Sedition Act.
In one of the first tests of freedom of speech, the House passed the Sedition Act, permitting the deportation, fine, or imprisonment of anyone deemed a threat or publishing “false, scandalous, or malicious writing” against the government of the United States. The 5th Congress (1797–1799), narrowly divided between the majority Federalists and minority Jeffersonian Republicans, voted 44 to 41 in favor of the Senate-passed bill. Federalists championed the legislation fearing impending war with France and out of the desire to hold the majority in Congress and to retain the White House, then occupied by Federalist John Adams. In an era when newspapers served as political parties' chief organs, the Republican press was particularly vicious in its attacks on Federalists and the Adams administration. “Liberty of the press and of opinion is calculated to destroy all confidence between man and man,” noted one of the bill’s supporters, John Allen of Connecticut. “It leads to the dissolution of every bond of union.” Republicans defended the First Amendment protecting free speech and press. “What will be the situation of the people?” James Madison of Virginia demanded. “Not free: because they will be compelled to make their election between competitors whose pretensions they are not permitted by act equally to examine, to discuss and to ascertain.” Signed into law by Adams on July 14, the law proved immensely unpopular with the public and the President lost re-election to Thomas Jefferson in 1800. Under the incoming Republican administration, the Sedition Act eventually expired on March 3, 1801; however, arguments made for and against it shaped subsequent debate about constitutional protections of free speech.

Related Highlight Subjects


The Sedition Act of 1918
From The United States Statutes at Large, V. 40. (April 1917-March 1919).




DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

The Sedition Act of 1918, enacted during World War I, made it a crime to "willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of the Government of the United States" or to "willfully urge, incite, or advocate any curtailment of the production" of the things "necessary or essential to the prosecution of the war." The act, along with other similar federal laws, was used to convict at least 877 people in 1919 and 1920, according to a report by the attorney general. In 1919, the Court heard several important free speech cases -- including Debs v. United States and Abrams v. United States -- involving the constitutionality of the law. In both cases, the Court upheld the convictions as well as the law.




Opinion: Michael Flynn's comments on Christianity are outrageous but not surprising


Michael Flynn, Donald Trump's former National Security adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and was later pardoned by Trump, wants to make it clear that in the United States, "If we are going to have one nation under God -- which we must -- we have to have one religion."

© BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images Gen. Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to US President Donald Trump, leaves Federal Court on December 1, 2017 in Washington, DC.


CNN 11/14/2021
Opinion by Dean Obeidallah 

Of course, to Flynn, that one religion is Christianity. (After all, 75% of White evangelicals voted for Trump in the 2020 election, according to exit polls.)

Flynn made these remarks in Texas on Saturday as part of the "ReAwaken America Tour," a conservative conference that features other Trump supporters, like Roger Stone and the My Pillow CEO/election conspiracy peddler Mike Lindell. While speaking at the event, Flynn referenced a passage from the New Testament book of Matthew, saying, "You have to believe this, that God Almighty is, like, involved in this country, because this is it ... This is the shining city on the hill."

That's when Flynn triggered a wave of backlash with his suggestion America should have one singular religion. "One nation under God, and one religion under God," he said. "I don't care what your ecumenical service is or what you are."

Now imagine if a Muslim or Jewish American leader made the same comment that the United States should have one faith, and that it should be Islam or Judaism. The outrage from the right would be deafening. But with Flynn's comments, there hasn't been noticeable pushback from conservatives. In fact, it's been the opposite. GOP Ohio Senate candidate Josh Mandel, who is Jewish, appears to see Flynn's comments as being in step with his own "Judeo-Christian values": "We Stand with General Flynn," Mandel tweeted in response to the backlash. "America was not founded as a secular nation." Politics does truly make strange bedfellows.

In contrast, Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, who is Muslim American, tweeted in response to Flynn's comments, "These people hate the US Constitution." I don't know if Flynn and those who support his mindset "hate" the Constitution, but I am certain that they either don't believe in or don't understand our Constitution and the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment.

This is the same Flynn who in 2016 repeatedly pushed debunked conspiracy theories that there was an effort to impose Islamic Sharia law on the rest of the country. "This Sharia law business, what's happening right here in the state of Texas is unbelievable," Flynn said at a San Antonio event that year hosted by ACT! for America, an anti-Muslim hate group per the Anti-Defamation League. At another 2016 speech in Texas, as CNN detailed, Flynn again falsely claimed there are Muslims who want to dominate America by imposing Islamic law: "I want people to understand that there are different laws that are not our laws that others try to impose," he said.

As a Muslim, let me be clear that there aren't any Muslims -- then or now -- trying to impose any of our religious beliefs onto the law of the United States. This was simply part of the right-wing demonization of Muslims because it played well with the GOP base. It's the same reason why, during the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump lied on NBC saying Muslims "don't want the laws that we have. They want Sharia law."

Beyond despicably demonizing other faiths, these examples show an idea of "freedom of religion" that ironically revolves around imposing one's beliefs upon the rest of us. Several on the right have been showing us that for years. For example, when Mike Huckabee ran for president in 2008, he bluntly said the US Constitution should be amended "so it's in God's standard" -- phrasing he later clarified after critics caught wind of the quote. And during his 2012 presidential run, Rick Santorum declared "our civil laws have to comport with a higher law: God's law." These Republicans were telling all who would listen that their goal was turning their religious beliefs into American law.

And we now have Republicans doing just that with their religion-based oppression of women's reproductive rights. The most visible example is the Texas GOP's anti-abortion law, which has garnered headlines for empowering private citizens to behave as vigilantes with the ability to sue anyone involved in securing an abortion beyond about six weeks of pregnancy. When Texas' Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed the legislation, he explained the rationale behind it as being faith-based: "Our creator endowed us with the right to life, and yet millions of children lose their right to life every year because of abortion," he said. "In Texas, we work to save those lives and that's exactly what the Texas Legislature did this session."

That's the same reasoning behind the Arkansas ban on nearly all abortions except to save the life of the mother. When the state's GOP Gov. Asa Hutchinson signed it, he declared the law was predicated upon his "sincere and long-held pro-life convictions." (As with the Texas law, Arkansas' ban has faced legal challenges for its obvious violation of Roe v. Wade.)

These laws are based on the religious belief held by some that life begins at conception. Having the freedom to personally follow one's faith is what our nation is predicated upon. Turning those religious beliefs into laws every American then must follow, however, is not. In fact, it's un-American, given that our First Amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

No one should be surprised by Flynn's comments. He's simply repeating what some in the GOP have long championed: The idea that "freedom of religion" is imposing their religious beliefs upon the rest of us. It's no wonder, then, why many on Twitter reacted to Flynn's comments with the phrase "American Taliban.


© Provided by CNN Dean Obeidallah


Russia starts missile supplies to India despite US sanctions risk
Maria Tsvetkova/Reuters
November 14, 2021

Russian S-400 Triumph medium-range and long-range surface-to-air missile systems drive during the Victory Day parade at Red Square in Moscow, Russia on May 9, 2015. (Reuters filepix)

MOSCOW (Nov 14): Russia has started supplying India with S-400 air defence missile systems, Russian news agencies reported on Sunday citing Dmitry Shugayev, the head of the Russian military cooperation agency.

The supplies put India at risk of sanctions from the United States, under a 2017 US law aimed at deterring countries from buying Russian military hardware.

"The first supplies have already been started," Interfax cited Shugayev as saying on Sunday at an aerospace trade show in Dubai.

He said that the first unit of an S-400 systems will arrive in India by the end of this year.

The US$5.5 billion deal for five long-range surface-to-air missile systems, which India says it needs to counter a threat from China, was signed in 2018.

India faces a range of financial sanctions from the United States under Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which names Russia an adversary alongside North Korea and Iran for its actions against Ukraine, interference in the US 2016 elections and help to Syria.

New Delhi said it has a strategic partnership with both the United States and Russia, while Washington told India it was unlikely to get a waiver from CAATSA.

Last year, the United Stated imposed sanctions citing CAATSA on NATO ally Turkey for acquiring S-400 missiles from Russia. The sanctions targeted the main Turkish defence procurement and development body Presidency of Defence Industries.

Washington also removed Turkey from a F-35 stealth fighter jet programme, the most advanced aircraft in the US arsenal, used by NATO members and other US allies.

Russia said it had offered Turkey its help in developing advanced fighter jets but no agreement has been reached so far.

"We are still at a stage of negotiations on this project," RIA new agency quoted Shugayev as saying on Sunday.
Justice In America: Unfit Judges, Lying Thugs, Screamingly Racist Lawyers and Only So Many Black Pastors Please


Judge Bruce Schroeder, ostensibly presiding over the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, takes a break on the bench with a cookie catalogue. Screenshot from courtroom livestream via YouTube.


ABBY ZIMET
November 11, 2021

This week we saw two dueling shitshows of egregious ineptitude, bias, WTF havoc and (likely) injustice in the high-profile trials of fake-crying idiot goon and hapless vigilante Kyle Rittenhouse, who randomly gunned down two protesters during BLM protests in Wisconsin with an AR-15 he got 'cause it "looked cool," and three vicious, racist Georgia good ole boys who somewhat more pointedly chased and gunned down Ahmaud Arbery for jogging while black in their lily-white Jim Crow neighborhood. The trial of the baby-faced "Vile Shittenhouse" has gotten far more press coverage, likely because he's been shamefully embraced as a heroic victim by a thug-loving right-wing that raised millions for his bail, insisted he went to Kenosha to "clean up the filth left by the rioting Biden voters,” and argued he “should walk away a free and rich man after suing for malicious prosecution" - never mind the leering photos of him in bars with Proud Boys giving a White Power sign in a T-shirt that gloats, "Free As Fuck." Claiming self-defence for killing Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum and wounding Gaige Grosskreutz, little Kyle has proved a less-than-compelling witness: Blank and dumb as a rock, he's been caught in lies, scrunched up his face in some dreadful, no-tears, Brett-Kavanaugh-style crying, and offered senseless narratives - ie: He went there to offer medical aid, yet walked away when his victim called for help. Twitter: "My kid wanted to be a medic for Halloween but I couldn’t find him an AR-15 in time...I don't always kill people in self-defense, but when I do I drive to a state I don't live in with an AR-15 and wander the streets with said AR-15, because...self defense.” Trayvon should have been so lucky.

Kyle's deficits have been matched by Judge Bruce Schroeder, 75, who has run such a blatantly partisan courtroom he seems to be working for the defence. Early on, he rejected multiple requests from prosecutors to allow proof of Kyle's white-supremacism and refused to let them call his victims "victims" - "too loaded" - while letting the defence call them "rioters" and "looters," though given they're dead who knows. Notes Elie Mystal, "(Refusing) to use linguistically accurate terms for people who did not voluntarily attempt to catch a bullet with their face" while allowing defence to use prejudicial language about them "is the very definition of bias." They were no angels, Schroeder implies, and neither are the prosecutors, which must be why he's repeatedly harangued and attacked them in court. He also babbled endlessly about tech things he doesn't get, let his cellphone ring in court to the Trumpian tune of "God Bless the U.S.A.," joked about the Asian food for lunch, and blithely sat on the bench perusing a cookie catalogue during breaks. The "racist-AR-15-toting-white-boys-will-be-racist-AR-15-toting-white boys" vibe was sumptiously reflected in a loopy New York Times puff piece (WTF NYT?!) that began, "Kyle Rittenhouse, who has idolized law enforcement since he was young, arrived in Kenosha (with) one mission: to play the role of police officer and medic.' Twitter: "Charles Manson, (who) idolized The Beatles, arrived in L.A. with dreams of recording success...John Wilkes Booth, who idolized theater since he was young, arrived at the Ford Theater with one mission: to catch a show from the balcony...Adolf Hitler, who has idolized artists, arrived in Berlin with one mission - to better his country...Jeffrey Dahmer, a shy polite loner, liked to go bar hopping, where he occasionally brought home people for dinner." If Kyle gets off, many speculate, he'll turn up on Dancing With the Stars and "Let's Go Vigilantes!" t-shirts will bloom. "BREAKING:" reads a Daily Show headline. "Judge in Case Reveals He Has Adopted Kyle Rittenhouse, Declares Mistrial 'Because He's My Son.'"

In Georgia, the trial of white thugs Gregory McMichael, his son Travis McMichael, and their neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan has gotten much less attention, maybe because the random death of another black man - in this case, Ahmaud Arbery, 25, out jogging in February 2020 - isn't news at this point, despite stomach-churning video that caught the three pudgy vigilantes chasing Arbery in two pickups, blocking his path, and shooting him like a dog with a shotgun in what's been called "a lynching in the 21st century." They've also claimed "self-defence," pleading not guilty to nine charges of murder, aggravated assault and false imprisonment. Here, too, dubious moves abound. In a state where African-Americans make up a third of the population, the jury is blindingly white - 11 white jurors, one black - after defence attorneys struck all but one potential black juror in what Judge Timothy Walmsley admitted was "intentional discrimination," though he did nothing to stop it; defence attorneys were so greedy for a skewed jury one even complained they hadn't gotten enough "bubbas or Joe six-packs," uneducated white hooligans looking for racist trouble. You know, like them. On Thursday, the jury heard from homeowner Larry English, whose unfinished house Arbery had been recorded wandering around, thus settlng up a narrative he was a thief. Nope, said English: He'd called 911 once before when video showed "a colored guy" who was "plundering around," but in fact Arbery had taken nothing. The day he was shot, English said, he was probably just stopping to take a drink of water from a faucet, which as far as we know isn't punishable by death yet, even in Georgia.


Still, that afternoon defence attorneys, evidently intent on proclaiming America's justice system is still by and for white people so let's not see too much uppityness around here, said the quiet part out loud and argued against the presence of a black pastor there to comfort Arbery's family - in this case, the Rev. Al Sharpton - seeing as how bringing "these people" in to sit with the victim's family would "intimidate" and "pressure" the jury, because, scary black men, and "there's only so many pastors they can have." “We don't want any more Black pastors coming in here, or other Jesse Jacksons (who was nowhere in sight, though the Rev. William Barber had led a prayer vigil outside and "these people" do kinda all look alike) trying to influence a jury in this case," said Kevin Gough, who represents Bryan, who last year on MLK Day sent a text that read, "I bet ya'll are truly having a Monkey Parade over there." Surprisingly declining to preface his remarks with, "I'm not a racist but," Gough said he's concerned about "bringing people in who really don’t have any ties to this case other than political interests” like the bond of humanity. In the bonkers twist of the day, he incomprehensibly added, "What if a bunch of people came in here dressed like Colonel Sanders with white masks...?" at which point he was mercifully interrupted by the judge, who said he was “not going to start blanketly excluding members of the public from this courtroom,” so forget it, dude. Because Gough doing such a crass racism was too weird to spark outrage, many observers were just baffled: Did they think the presence of servants of God undermined their effort to make Arbery "look like the perpetrator that he never was?...Does Gough have a problem with all Christians, or just the black ones?...Are they worried the Black pastors will pray too hard?" Apparently, they should be: There are reports that, when the trial resumes next week, 100 Black pastors will be in attendance. Meanwhile, watching American "justice" at work, Jesus, Lady Justice and MLK wept.



ABBY ZIMET  has written CD's Further column since 2008. A longtime, award-winning journalist, she moved to the Maine woods in the early 70s, where she spent a dozen years building a house, hauling water and writing before moving to Portland. Having come of political age during the Vietnam War, she has long been involved in women's, labor, anti-war, social justice and refugee rights issues.
How Buffalo News Helped Keep a Socialist Out of City Hall

There were many actors in the political establishment that worked hard to keep Byron Brown in office, and the Buffalo News was definitely one of them.



Community organizer and self-described socialist India Walton won the Democratic primary for mayor in Buffalo but has continued to face stiff opposition from the party establishment.
 (Photo: Indiawalton.com)

ARI PAUL
November 13, 2021
 by Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)

Incumbent Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown's seemingly quixotic write-in campaign for re-election, launched after losing the Democratic primary to democratic socialist activist India Walton, turned out to be successful. He had a lot of help in his corner, such as unions with whom he had long-standing relationships (WIVB, 9/6/21), Republicans who worried about a left-wing mayor (WGRZ, 8/19/21) and high-ranking New York state Democrats who withheld their endorsement of the nominee (City and State, 10/25/21).

Brown, crucially, also had the key support of the hometown paper, the Buffalo News.

'Driven by grievances'

In its editorial endorsement (10/23/21) of Brown in the general election, the paper propped up Brown's power of incumbency against Walton, whom the paper called "dangerously unqualified" and the "municipal version of electing Donald Trump: expecting great things from an inexperienced and unqualified leader who is sometimes driven by grievances." It added that "many of her proposals would set the city back," chastising her for going too far in demanding a reduction in the police budget. The paper argued that "although she has toned down her rhetoric since the June primary," her "approach is divisive" and she is "a political rookie."


In its endorsement, the Buffalo News (10/23/21) said of Byron Brown, "There have been missteps, as there are with any mayor"—but it didn't say what any of them were.

The endorsement cited the News's coverage (10/19/21) of an affordable plan Walton had championed as a community leader that failed to come to fruition, quoting one person who cited Walton and her partner's "inexperience with complex housing projects of this scale." This was a follow-up to another story (10/5/21) in which the News gave Brown the chance to criticize her record on affordable housing.

After having also endorsed Brown (6/12/21) in the primary, the paper (6/29/21) supported his write-in campaign. Enough city voters are "concerned about having an inexperienced and self-proclaimed democratic socialist take over the city's top job that Brown's write-in campaign has a chance to succeed," the paper editorialized; Buffalo should not "undergo such a drastic change based on such a small number of primary voters."

The Trump comparison is a standard charge corporate media throw against left candidates (FAIR.org, 1/24/20), illustrative of the content-free dismissal of progressive challengers: Anyone who deviates from establishment politics is like Trump, and thus all those connotations of intransigence, dishonesty, bullying and divisiveness stick with the candidate, even if they disagree with Trump on everything from policing to taxation to immigration.

'Intimately impolite language'


The paper's attacks on Walton weren't limited to the editorial pages. The News (7/20/21) reported that "an allegation of drug activity at a house rented by Democratic mayoral nominee India B. Walton three years ago cast new perspectives on her campaign," although the paper admitted that "nobody was charged in connection with the complaints activity," adding that the "man suspected of dealing drugs from Walton's home was Anson Whitted, who served more than 12 years in state prison for selling cocaine, assault and possession of a weapon." It said, "Walton denied Whitted ever lived at her home, but acknowledged he occasionally stayed there."


A police investigation into someone else that led to no charges was the focus of repeated Buffalo News articles about India Walton (7/19/21, 7/20/21).

In short, she had nothing to do with any criminal activity whatsoever, but the Buffalo News sullied her name with racialized language about drugs and crime with a flimsy connection. About a dozen activists protested outside the paper's headquarters for what they called biased coverage against Walton, with one activist (WGRZ, 7/21/21) saying the News "article was full of 'half-truths, misstatements and misallegations.'"

The News also played up Walton's 2014 arrest when she was working as a nurse (8/19/21)—the details of which are murky, even by the News's own accounting—insinuating that she was too questionable to be in the city's highest office. The piece said that Walton was arrested "on a charge of second-degree harassment on June 27, 2014, at work at Children's Hospital," and that "the arresting officer said a fellow nurse had complained that Walton 'has continuously threatened to do bodily harm' to her." Later on in the piece, the News says "Walton denied that she ever harmed the co-worker," noting that she was "the victim of bullying on social media by the woman who had her arrested."

What's interesting about such lengthy coverage of the incident is that it ended with Walton receiving a slap on the wrist, as WIVB (7/8/21) reported that Walton "took an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal," which is "a legal mechanism that allows charges to be dropped as long as a defendant stays out of trouble."

And while one lengthy piece (10/23/21) praised her tenacity and commitment to her ideals, it questioned whether she was ready for political life, quoting one activist, "She has an angry temper." The paper added, "Walton indeed has a history of using raw language in protests and elsewhere," using "intimately impolite language referring" to a political opponent who had "criticized her call for cutting police funding."



"Is she ready to trade the trash talk of the community activist for the more polite ways of a mayor?" the Buffalo News (10/23/21) asked of Walton. "What would India Walton say to voters who think she's already proved herself too irresponsible to be mayor?"

Another piece (10/17/21), noting that she had softened her "defund the police" rhetoric in her run for mayor, reported that she had been captured on video during a demonstration, chanting: "No justice, no peace. Fuck these racist ass police."

The newspaper's coverage of Walton's colorful language and personal issues falls into tropes about assertive Black women: They are rough, unsophisticated and bullying. Passion about injustice isn't seen as a natural or even admirable response, but rather unchecked rage that should be kept from official levers of power.

Austerity mayor

A newspaper has the responsibility to treat all candidates with scrutiny. Yet, the editorial board's endorsement of Byron Brown doesn't acknowledge that he supported former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's pension cuts (Business Council, 2/3/12) and signed a law limiting social services (Buffalo News, 10/4/06), two examples of his role as an austerity mayor. It's likely that the News just doesn't see these issues as problems; the editorial board hailed Brown's tax cuts, for example. As Jacobin (11/1/21) noted, Brown's tax vision always favoring bigger cuts for businesses, with commercial property taxes in the city having dropped 28% by 2017. The declining revenue left the city more dependent on federal and state aid to plug constant budget shortfalls, and led to painful spending cuts. By 2020, Brown was denying city workers a 2% raise.

The cuts to Buffalo's property tax rate could be justified by shifting the tax burden to those who could pay more. But instead, Brown stealthily raised taxes on the working class through hikes on user fees, increasingly aggressive parking and traffic fines, and other aggressive claw-back measures, like late fees on overdue bills—for some, anyway. After six years, Brown's administration had simply left $22 million of housing fines uncollected for nearly 1,500 property owners who had violated building and health codes, further starving the city of funds while undermining the work of city inspectors.

This didn't have much impact on the paper's coverage this fall.


Jacobin (11/1/21) noted that "Brown has successfully turned the conversation away from his own many scandals and misdeeds in elected office to the flaws of his opponent's private life."

'A fundamentally conservative paper'


The paper is owned by Iowa-based Lee Enterprises, the fourth-largest newspaper chain in the country; Lee bought the paper from Berkshire Hathaway in 2020 for a reported $140 million (Buffalo News, 1/29/20). The company's "board is stacked with Republican donors," the Intercept (5/24/17) reported. The company has clashed with the News union, which went on a byline strike in protest of Lee Enterprises, saying "the company wants the power to lay off any guild workers for any reason," and "wants to move jobs out of Buffalo" (WIVB, 6/15/21). Historically, according to Open Secrets, the company has backed Republicans, though in 2020 it gave overwhelmingly to Democrats.


The Intercept (5/24/17) noted that in the race for Montana's House seat between Republican Greg Gianforte (famous for physically attacking a reporter) and Democrat Rob Quist, Montana's Lee papers "focused their reporting heavily on Quist's debt and financial woes." Gianforte ended up winning the election.


Buffalo native Raina Lipsitz, a Nation and New Republic contributor who has covered Buffalo politics and is writing a book about the ascendant left for Verso Books, was interviewed by FAIR about the Buffalo News:

It's a fundamentally conservative paper that sees itself as embodying an old-school, "voice from nowhere" tone, but actually engages in a lot of fear-mongering about socialism and redistributive policies in general. It is squarely on the side of local developers and corporate interests—it's both beholden and naturally sympathetic to the business community, and sees business leaders and owners as the backbone of the community. From the News' perspective, the last, best hope of moving Buffalo forward is attracting as many big, splashy development deals as possible, which will in turn, the paper thinks, bring more jobs to Buffalo.

It's the paper of record in the city of Buffalo, and many of its star political reporters are white men in their 60s and 70s. Buffalo is a Democratic town and a union town, and everyday people are often sympathetic to labor. But, as a general rule, the News doesn't approve of people who go "too far," and that includes most left-wing candidates and movements. Sure, Black lives matter—all lives matter!—but it's always wrong, in the News's eyes, to make that point too loudly or "divisively." The News employs a number of traditional Catholics, and has historically been hostile to abortion rights.

November 2021 was not a good month for Democrats (FAIR.org, 11/5/21), as the Republican victory in the Virginia governor's race indicated they were likely headed for trouble in the 2022 midterms. But it was also a disappointment for progressives and socialists, who had thought that Walton's election was all but assured. And given the fact that Rupert Murdoch's New York Post (11/3/21) welcomed Brown's victory as a "law and order" candidate, Walton's loss does feel like a win for the right. There were many actors in the political establishment that worked hard to keep Brown in office, and the Buffalo News was definitely one of them.

© 2021 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)


Ari Paul is a New York-based journalist who has reported for the Nation, the Guardian, the Forward, the Brooklyn Rail, Vice News, In These Times, Jacobin and many other outlets.

I'm an athlete, and I happen to wear a hijab. Get over it

My hijab doesn't define me, but it's part of who I am and I will never give it up

Fairouz Gaballa started wearing her hijab in Grade 8, and now sees it as an integral part of her identity. (Submitted by Fairouz Gaballa)
This is a First Person column by Fairouz Gaballa, a student in Charlottetown. For more information about CBC's First Person stories, please see the FAQ.

There are moments when I'm running when I feel out of sorts and completely different from everyone around me.

I wear a hijab and you don't see many others wearing them on the track — or in other places on Prince Edward Island.

However, there are other times when I forget that I look different from everyone else because I feel so comfortable doing something that makes me feel good about myself.

There are a lot of people who genuinely believe that women are oppressed in the Islamic faith. A hijab — a head covering that many Muslim women wear — is perceived by some as symbol of oppression.

When I first began wearing my hijab in Grade 8, it was just a religious act. But a few years down the road, it became who I was — a sweet proclamation of my identity in the face of Islamophobia.

There are awesome things that come from wearing a hijab — like never having another bad hair day. But in a western society, there are a few setbacks to wearing a hijab. Aside from the prejudice and discrimination I face regularly, I realized that there aren't many athletes who are also hijabis.

A drastic change, overnight

When I started wearing my hijab, my life changed drastically.

I went from having friends to having no friends, from people thinking I was of mixed race (because of my pre-hijab appearance) to people automatically assuming I must have been a refugee from Syria who spoke no English. I had immigrated as a child from Egypt, but I grew up on P.E.I., and I speak English fluently with a Canadian accent. 

Whether anyone decides to admit it or not, there are some teachers and kids who discriminate against students who are different.

I went from being a friend to a "terrorist" or a "towel head." People avoided me. Living on P.E.I. was especially hard because the Island at the time was not as diverse as it is now. 

Fairouz Gaballa says no one remarked on her appearance until she started wearing a hijab while still in school. That's when nasty, hate-filled comments filled her ears. (Fairouz Gaballa)

Fast forward to 2021, and there are still bigots who think any individual who wears a hijab is automatically a refugee or a "terrorist" or some terrible human being.

Finding my place on the track

While wearing a hijab, I've been part of two sports. From 2016 until 2020, I was part of Charlottetown Martial Arts where I competed in many tournaments and a couple of championships. Aside from myself and my sister, there was only one other female competitor who wore a hijab, and she wasn't from P.E.I.

I joined the track team in my last year of high school in 2019, and I've been running ever since. I'm now on the women's distance team at UPEI. I'm again the only athlete on my team who wears a hijab.

I'm happy to prove bigots wrong, and I'm happy to smile at people who call me 'towel head' as I run past them

Sometimes, when I'm running, all some people do is stare, and not the "hmm … cool" kind of stare. Those stares lead to a smile, and then those people go on with their day. These stares are different: eyebrows pinch together, mouths open, heads turn and follow me as I move. There are no smiles, and it's uncomfortably awkward. 

Fairouz Gaballa, centre of front row, is a proud member of UPEI's track team. (Submitted by Fairouz Gaballa)

My varsity coach, who got me into running in the first place, creates an inclusive and tolerant team culture, and everyone is expected to work as a team. I don't think there's any space for intolerance or bigotry. 

As well, there have been some awesome teammates who genuinely go out of their way to make me feel comfortable and part of the team. And that effort definitely goes a long way.

I am happy to be an athlete who happens to wear a hijab. My hijab doesn't define me as a person, but it is part of who I am, and it's something I will never give up.

I'm happy that I know for sure at least one person who feels like they're the odd one out will see me running, and feel like they too can do something regardless of how they look.

I'm happy that regardless of how much insecure, angry individuals try to put me down, I don't stop running. I'm happy that I'm doing something I love.

I'm happy to prove bigots wrong and I'm happy to smile at people who call me "towel head" as I run past them.

Fairouz Gaballa says she will not stop running with her hijab regardless of what bigots call her. (Submitted by Fairouz Gaballa)

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Fairouz Gaballa

Contributor

Fairouz Gaballa is a third-year psychology student at the University of Prince Edward Island, where she is also an athlete on the women's cross-country team. She was born in Cairo, and immigrated to Charlottetown when she was nine years old.