Wednesday, January 24, 2024

   

 

Multi-generational toxicant exposures show cumulative, inherited health effects


Peer-Reviewed Publication

WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY




While exposure to a single substance like DDT has been shown to create inherited disease susceptibility, a recent study in animals found exposure to multiple different toxicants across generations can amplify those health problems.

In the study, published in the journal Environmental Epigenetics, an initial generation of pregnant rats was exposed to a common fungicide, then their progeny to jet fuel and the following generation to DDT. When those rats were then bred out to a fifth unexposed generation, the incidence of obesity as well as kidney and prostate diseases in those animals were compounded, rising by as much as 70%.

Researchers also found that their epigenetics, molecular processes independent of DNA that influence gene expression, were also greatly altered.

“We looked at multiple-generation exposures because these types of things are going on routinely, and previous research has only looked at single exposures,” said Michael Skinner, a WSU biology professor and the study’s corresponding author. “We found that if multiple generations get different exposures, then eventually there’s an amplification or compounded effect on some diseases.”

The study did show that for other diseases, those associated with the ovaries and the testes, the incidence rose in the first generation of progeny but appeared to plateau with the additional generational exposures.

Skinner and his colleagues also conducted epigenetic analysis of each generation of the animals, finding that the toxicant exposures shifted their entire epigenetics dramatically. Along with changes to genes themselves, inherited epigenetics which influence gene expression, are considered to have a significant impact on evolution.

“When we made the comparisons with different generations, we did not find a lot of overlap in epigenetics. In other words, every time each generation had a new exposure, it appeared to reprogram the whole epigenome,” Skinner said.

While the study does not exactly mimic what may have happened to human generations, people in the US have potentially been exposed to these particular toxicants at different times. The authors note a likely sequential exposure over human generations might involve an exposure to DDT which was widely used in the 1950s, then plastics in the 1970s, followed by many modern herbicides still in use today.

The study provides evidence that multiple toxicant exposures of past human generations likely had a compounded impact on grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Knowing about these possible impacts can help people and doctors address potential diseases before they develop, Skinner said.

Researchers including Skinner’s lab at WSU have been working to identify epigenetic biomarkers for inherited health conditions in humans including for obesityautism and pre-term birth.

“We need to know to what degree our past generations activities that have affected us,” Skinner said. “We cannot necessarily fix this problem, but it's important to know that it happened so that we can try to better treat potential health problems through preventative medicine.”

This research received support from the John Templeton Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

JOURNAL

DOI

Forever chemicals" in German drinking water - a hidden threat unveiled


Peer-Reviewed Publication

NANJING INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, MEE

Graphical abstract. 

IMAGE: 

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT.

view more 

CREDIT: ECO-ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH



PFAS, commonly known as "forever chemicals," are a group of man-made substances that have been used in various industries since the 1940s due to their resistance to heat, water, and oil.These chemicals are found in products like non-stick cookware, waterproof fabrics, firefighting foams, and food packaging.Their persistence in the environment and their ability to accumulate in human and animal tissue make them a concern for potential adverse health impacts. Despite their widespread use, the knowledge about pose potential risks to drinking water quality,  especially in Germany, has been limited.

In a landmark study (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2023.08.004) published in "Eco-Environment & Health" (Volume 2, 2023), researchers screened German drinking water for 26 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). This effort, notably supported by residents, marks a significant step in understanding PFAS presence in drinking water.

The study involved collecting 89 drinking water samples from various locations in Germany, analyzing them for 26 different PFAS using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The findings revealed that while the 20 recently regulated PFAS were below the detection limit, the sum concentrations varied widely, with some samples exceeding the threshold for certain PFAS.

This research is pivotal in informing future regulatory decisions and public health guidelines. It highlights the need for ongoing surveillance and stricter controls on PFAS in drinking water.

Dr. Aki Sebastian Ruhl, emphasizes the importance of this study in providing a comprehensive view of PFAS distribution in drinking water across Germany, a crucial aspect in evaluating environmental and health risks.

The collaborative effort in this study has provided valuable insights into PFAS levels in German drinking water, laying the groundwork for future environmental and public health initiatives, and underscores the necessity for further research to understand the long-term implications of PFAS in drinking water and to develop more efficient removal methods.

The collaborative effort in this study has provided valuable insights into PFAS levels in German drinking water, laying the groundwork for future environmental and public health initiatives, and underscores the necessity for further research to understand the long-term implications of PFAS in drinking water and to develop more efficient removal methods.

###

References

DOI

10.1016/j.eehl.2023.08.004

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2023.08.004

Funding information

The project Spu-TriDa was funded by the German Ministry of Health.

About Eco-Environment & Health

Eco-Environment & Health (EEHis an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal designed for publications on the frontiers of the ecology, environment and health as well as their related disciplines. EEH focuses on the concept of "One Health" to promote green and sustainable development, dealing with the interactions among ecology, environment and health, and the underlying mechanisms and interventions. Our mission is to be one of the most important flagship journals in the field of environmental health.

Exposure to flame retardants linked to premature birth, higher birth weight


Organophosphate ester flame retardants are found in building materials, furniture, baby products, electronics and textiles


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - DAVIS HEALTH

Deborah Bennett UC Davis 

IMAGE: DEBORAH BENNETT, SENIOR AUTHOR OF THE STUDY, IS A PROFESSOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN THE UC DAVIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCES. view more 

CREDIT: UC DAVIS HEALTH




(SACRAMENTO, Calif.) — In the largest study of its kind, researchers at UC Davis Health found that exposure to organophosphate ester flame retardants during pregnancy was associated with preterm birth, especially among females. The chemicals were also linked to higher birth weight, a concern for increased obesity risk. The major new research study was published in Environmental Health Perspectives.

“The importance of this study lies in unraveling the potential impact of exposure to environmental chemicals during pregnancy on fetal development. Our findings guide our understanding of how these chemicals may be silently seeding lasting challenges for the health of the next generation,” said Jiwon Oh, first author of the study and a postdoctoral scholar in the Department of Public Health SciencesDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health.

OPEs phased in as polybrominated flame retardants phased out

In the mid-2000s, one class of chemicals, polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants, were gradually phased out of use due to concerns about their potential toxicity.

Organophosphate esters, or OPEs, gradually took their place. They are now widely used in foams found in furniture, baby products, electronics, textiles and building materials to prevent fires and make plastics more flexible.

Because of their chemical structure, OPEs slowly degrade and become part of dust. Individuals are exposed to OPEs through their skin or when they ingest or inhale indoor dust.

The chemicals are frequently detected in urine samples from the U.S. general population, including samples from pregnant people. For this study, the researchers wanted to determine what impact OPEs might have on fetal development during pregnancy.

Research conducted across U.S.

Researchers at multiple institutions, including UC Davis, conducted the study. It included 6,646 mother-child pairs from 16 cohorts across the U.S. from the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) study. The participants came from various regions and had diverse backgrounds.

Researchers measured nine OPE biomarkers in urine samples of pregnant people collected between 2007 and 2020, with most samples obtained during the second and third trimesters.

They assessed birth outcomes, including gestational age at birth and birth weight, primarily using medical records or parent reports.

Preterm births and greater birth weight

The researchers found three of the nine OPEs were associated with increased risks of preterm birth (before 37 weeks of pregnancy), especially among female newborns. These included:

  • dibutyl phosphate
  • di-isobutyl phosphate
  • bis(butoxyethyl) phosphate

Preterm births can put infants at risk of health issues, including breathing and feeding problems, developmental delays, cerebral palsy, and vision and hearing problems.

Three other OPEs — bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate, bis(2-methylphenyl) phosphate, and dipropyl phosphate — were linked to greater birth weight-for-gestational-age.

High birth weight is associated with childhood obesity, which increases the risk of health conditions like diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

“There were over 6,000 pregnancies included in this study, and with such a large study, we are very confident of our findings,” said Deborah Bennett, senior author of the study and a professor of environmental health in the Department of Public Health Sciences. “Policy options to reduce exposure to organophosphate ester flame retardants should be considered.”

OPEs are metabolic and endocrine-disrupting chemicals

The researchers noted that OPEs may affect thyroid hormone levels and cause inflammation and oxidative stress, which could play a role in the preterm births. OPEs are also endocrine disruptors, so they may contribute to abnormal placental development, and the impact may vary based on the sex of the fetus.

“Because OPEs are from building materials, textiles, electronics and other products, consumers cannot choose products that do not contain OPEs,” Oh said. “Only policy changes and regulations can mitigate their exposure.”

Resources

 

 

 

Researchers propose paradigm shift with "planetary commons" to safeguard earth's critical systems


A groundbreaking research paper challenges conventional notions of global commons and advocates for a more expansive framework called the "Planetary Commons".


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN

Planet Earth 

IMAGE: 

"PLANETARY COMMONS" NEEDED TO SAFEGUARD EARTH'S CRITICAL SYSTEMS

view more 

CREDIT: UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN




A groundbreaking research paper, published this week in the renowned journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), challenges conventional notions of global commons and advocates for a more expansive framework called the "Planetary Commons."

The study, conducted by a collaborative team of 22 leading international researchers - including Professor Louis Kotzé, Senior Professorial Fellow in Lincoln Law School and Professor Duncan French, Head of College of Health & Science and Professor of International Law - over nearly two years, calls for a paradigm shift in global governance to effectively safeguard the Earth's critical systems.

The traditional concept of global commons, encompassing shared resources beyond national borders such as the deep oceans, high seas, the atmosphere, and Antarctica, is expanded upon by the researchers. They argue that these global commons must not only include geographic regions but also critical biophysical systems that regulate the resilience and state of the entire planet—what they term the Planetary Commons.

According to Professor Louis Kotzé, co-lead author and a legal expert affiliated with the University of Lincoln, UK, and North-West University in South Africa: "Our existing global environmental law and governance framework is unable to address the planetary crisis and keep us from crossing planetary boundaries. This is why we urgently need Planetary Commons as a new law and governance approach that can safeguard critical Earth system regulating functions more effectively."

The researchers stress that the Planetary Commons go beyond jurisdictional boundaries and sovereign entitlements. They argue that all states and people share a collective interest in protecting and effectively governing these critical Earth system functions for the collective good.

The researchers’ proposed framework, built on the idea of global commons but significantly expanded, addresses the unprecedented pressure that human activities place on Earth's critical regulatory systems.

Fellow co-lead author, Johan Rockström, Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and Professor of Earth System Science at the University of Potsdam, emphasises the need for transnational cooperation, stating: "To limit risks for human societies and secure critical Earth system functions, the researchers propose a new framework of planetary commons to guide governance of the planet. This planetary commons framework has the potential to initiate the long overdue paradigm shift that we urgently need to safeguard the Earth system."

The publication marks a milestone in the intersection of law, politics, and Earth system science. The researchers hope that their work will contribute to the development of a new global governance approach to address the planetary crisis and secure the stability and resilience of Earth's critical systems.

ENDS

 

Delhi smog: India's cities must look beyond their limits to clean up air pollution 


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF SURREY




Delhi smog: India's cities must look beyond their limits to clean up air pollution 

Delhi needs the help of its rural neighbours to finally beat its killer smog problem, concludes a review carried out by the University of Surrey and regional government officials in Delhi, India.  

Professor Prashant Kumar, founding director of Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE) at the University of Surrey, said:  

“Air pollution doesn’t respect city boundaries – and so it must be tackled at regional level. If cities like Delhi want to avoid the lethal smog seen in recent years, they’ll need neighbouring rural areas to help them. We know this approach works – we've seen success in places like Mexico City and Los Angeles. By working together, we can tackle air pollution.” 

In most Indian cities (60%), the air is over seven times more polluted than it should be. This has huge health implications.  

Some of this pollution comes from neighbouring rural areas – from crop burning, wood stoves, or power plants.  

Yet measures to tackle urban smog usually ignore rural sources. Instead, they focus only on measures within the city limits – like boosting public transport or controlling pollution from industry and building sites. 

The GCARE review recommends tackling air pollution at a regional level instead. This means identifying the wider area where a city’s pollution is produced – its so-called “airshed”.  

GCARE makes several recommendations:  

  • Regional air quality plans should be drawn up – which has worked well in places like Mexico City and Los Angeles. 
  • "Smog forecasts” could be produced with better monitoring. Satellites could spot bonfires and other sources of pollution. Scientists could then predict how it would interact with weather conditions.  
  •  “Airshed Councils” could help local, regional and federal agencies co-ordinate their efforts.  

Dr Anwar Ali Khan, Senior Environmental Engineer on the Delhi Pollution Control Committee, said: 

“Delhi’s neighbouring States have an important role to play in helping save lives in our city – and in their areas too. We need an action plan with a sound scientific basis, and we need better monitoring. This requires cities, governments and others to work together. A joined-up approach is the only way to defeat this deadly health hazard.” 

Dr Mukesh Khare, Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology, said:  

"A significant portion of air pollution stems from sources outside city limits, which requires a shift from city-specific to region-specific emission reduction targets. The establishment of an airshed will be a critical tool for effective air quality management and planning." 

The research project demonstrates the University of Surrey’s contributions to a number of UN Sustainability Goals (SDG), including: No Poverty (SDG 1), No Hunger (SDG 2), Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7) and Climate Action (SDG 13). 

The full paper is published in the journal Sustainable Horizons

 

Detention fails to help young lawbreakers avoid further offenses, report shows


Peer-Reviewed Publication

ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE



Youth who are caught stealing, using illegal drugs, or committing other moderate crimes are far less likely to reoffend when they receive therapy, life-skills training, and other rehabilitative help rather than legal punishment, a growing body of research shows.

These findings underscore efforts in many states to implement programs that protect young people who engage in crime from reoffending and spiraling into a life of hardship, according to a new report published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. Increasingly, policymakers are recognizing that processing youth through the courts may cause long-lasting psychological harm at a critical time in their development.

“If policymakers could take away one finding from the research summarized in this article, it would be that formal sanctioning, (e.g., court appearance) was never related to better life outcomes … for youths charged with moderately serious offenses,” the report states.

The authors of the report include APS Fellow Elizabeth Cauffman, developmental psychologist Jordan Beardslee, and clinical psychologist Marie Gillespie, all of University of California, Irvine;  Frank Davis of the Alternative Public Defender’s Office in Orange County, California; Judge Maria Hernandez of the Superior Court of Orange County; and Tamika Williams, Orange County deputy district attorney.

The report outlines 20 years’ worth of developmental science, including two large, long-term studies, both co-led by Cauffman, involving adolescent boys and men in early adulthood who become entangled in the justice system. 

Criminal behavior tends to peak in late adolescence and decline in early adulthood. And most youth, even those charged with serious felonies, become law-abiding adults, Cauffman and her co-authors emphasize. But several factors heighten individuals’ risk for ongoing offending, including:

  • antisocial traits,
  • substance use,
  • poor impulse control,
  • low expectations for the future,
  • perceptions of the justice system as unfair,
  • parental neglect,
  • school suspension or expulsion, and
  • community poverty and violence.

The authors also point to racial inequities in judicial sanctions on youth. Research shows that adolescents of color are arrested, referred to juvenile court, subject to harsher sentences, and tried as adults more than White youths. One study indicated that Black boys and young men were rearrested more often than their White peers despite equal or even lower rates of offending.

The authors suggest that juvenile justice policymakers not only minimize formal processing and detention for youths who commit lower-level offenses but expand diversion programs and other alternatives to jail time. 

“Adolescents are continuing to change and the response to their behavior should be developmentally appropriate,” Cauffman said. “How we respond to young people in the justice system matters. And if we want to improve community safety, we should use the science to guide both policy and practice.” 

These reforms should apply not only to adolescents but to individuals transitioning into adulthood, as research has shown that the human brain continues maturing into a person’s mid and late 20s. A promising concept is the young adult court (YAC), a specialized program for individuals ages 18-25, the authors noted. They are conducting a randomized control trial in Orange County to examine differences between young adults who are processed through a YAC versus traditional means. Young men in the YAC are supervised for at least 18 months by the court and specially trained probation officers. The youth receive help with life skills, employment, health, housing, and education. A judge can dismiss or reduce charges against those who complete the program. 

“We hope to understand the extent to which involvement with the YAC is related to short- and long-term positive outcomes in behavior, mental and physical health, school and work, and other domains,” the authors wrote.

In a commentary accompanying the report, Felice Upton, Assistant Secretary of Juvenile Rehabilitation for Washington State, argued that strengthening educational and vocational training programs with juvenile detention facilities also stands to help lift young offenders’ life trajectory. She also emphasized the importance of addressing detained youths’ psychological problems, noting that a high number of individuals entering the juvenile justice system in her state meet a diagnosis for complex post-traumatic stress disorder. Prior research has linked mental health disorders with delinquency. 

“Bringing systems and science together to find solutions is essential to help young people desist from criminal justice system involvement,” Upton wrote.

The report, “Adolescent Contact, Lasting Impact? Lessons Learned From Two Longitudinal Studies Spanning 20 Years of Developmental Science Research With Justice-system-involved Youth,” is available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15291006231205173. Upton’s commentary is available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15291006231218669.

 

The Association for Psychological Science is the scientific home of thousands of leading psychological science researchers, practitioners, teachers, and students from around the world. APS is dedicated to advancing scientific psychology across disciplinary and geographic borders and committed to disseminating psychological science to the public, incentivizing global collaboration among researchers, catalyzing the further development of psychological science, and promoting the application of psychological science to public policy.

 

Centralized social networks potentially hinder innovation by making decision-making too similar


Study examines how communities adopt innovative and sustainable farming practices


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY



Social systems where influence is focused around one or a few individuals may create environments where new ideas are ignored, and innovation is hindered.

This is according to a study published today in People and Nature by researchers at the University of Sydney and Stockholm University. It looked at the social networks and fertiliser use of 30 rural, cocoa-producing villages in Sulawesi, to examine how innovative and sustainable farming practices are adopted among communities.

It found that when one or two farmers hold a disproportionate level of influence (often due to their roles as "model farmers" in official sustainability programs) most other farmers tend to adopt similar practices, in this case decisions around how to fertilise their crops.

This type of social hierarchy – referred to by the researchers as “hub and spoke” networks – risks hindering innovation and could be detrimental to the adoption of practices which promote sustainability and food security, said Associate Professor Matous from the University of Sydney’s School of Project Management.

“If you’ve ever watched a group of kindergarteners play soccer, you’ll know that they run after the one kid who has the ball all at the same time. It’s a bit like that – to foster innovation what you really need is people playing a range of roles and exploring a problem from different angles,” said Associate Professor Matous.

“Centralising influence risks locking in the wrong approach as the status quo – from there it can create a culture of homogeneity, reinforcing pack mentality and group think. When combined with power hierarchies in which those who are less central are not listened to, it can crowd out innovative voices, sometimes swaying entire communities one way or another. In the case of fertilisers, this is a problem because too much can threaten the environment and too little can impact food security,” he said.

According to a UN study, smallholder farms support the livelihoods of 2.5 billion people worldwide, with farmers’ decisions on how to manage their land having profound consequences for the environment and global food security. The research was published in collaboration with Swisscontact, an NGO that works to promote sustainable agricultural practices.

“As we advocate for a nuanced approach to sustainable farming initiatives, we caution against programs that elevate a select group of farmers based merely on the fact that these farmers have been the conduit for outside interventions in the past. This can simply reinforce traditionalists and therefore, the status quo,” says Ross Jaax, Swisscontact’s Senior Technical Advisor for Sustainable Agriculture.

The study’s co-author from the University of Stockholm, Professor Örjan Bodin said: “While these individuals may hold sway in the short term, our findings suggest that top-down interventions risk undermining the social fabric of communities, potentially hindering adaptive capacities in the face of evolving agricultural and environmental challenges.

Associate Professor Matous said the results extend beyond the agricultural context and may also hold some truth in corporate and other leadership settings, areas which the School of Project Management explores.

“In contrast to the popular idea of a strong leader, we are interested in understanding socialised forms of leadership where decisions and influence are broadly shared, so we can find more effective ways of engaging communities in projects and programs".

DISCLOSURE:

The researchers have no conflicts of interest to declare. The research was financially supported by Swisscontact.