The Real Story of Alberta's BSE Crisis

Mad Cow Crisis was made in Alberta

"Shoot, Shovel, Shut-up"
Premier Ralph Klein

The Death of the Alberta Packing House industry, Lack of Feedlot Inspections, and Privatization,led to the BSE Crisis

NEWS FLASH:

U.S. moves to reopen the border to Canadian cows after court lifts ban

By BETH GORHAM

U.S. border closure seen bringing permanent split in North American beef market

Canada's red meat processing industry has annual sales of $11.4-billion, employs 34,000 people, and is the fourth-largest manufacturing sector after cars, petroleum and lumber.

That increased capacity won't go away when the U.S. border is reopened to live cattle from Canada, Laws said.

"The bricks and mortar investments that we've been making to process the cattle that we used to export to the U.S. are quite literally 'concrete.' They will not be dismantled if the border opens later this month.

"At the end of the day the Canadian beef industry will be stronger than it was before and better able to compete on the international stage."

Even if the border is reopened, the meat packers are confident that Canadian ranchers will make sure they stay in business, Laws said.

"This is a growing industry in Canada," he said. "We know Canadian farmers will not soon forget that border closed and that they need to keep supplying this extra capacity that was built in Canada."

In contrast, U.S. meat packing plants have been closing or operating far below capacity, said Patrick Boyle, president of the American Meat Institute.

He said 7,800 jobs are gone in the U.S. industry, although he blames that on a combination of factors, not just the lost access to Canadian cattle.

The price of ground beef in the United States has risen so sharply that low-income consumers are shifting to other types of protein such as pork and chicken, he said.

"The changes that are occurring in the U.S. beef industry will become permanent and so too will the corresponding changes that are occurring here in Canada," he said.

"Former partners in trade, in an integrated market, will now become fierce competitors in international markets going forward, unless we can restore trade to our two countries."

Which proves my point in this article, that we need to have an indiginous Alberta packing house industry that is a cooperative between producers and plant workers. Otherwise we remain a branch plant of Tyson, XL and Cargill, who will profit from Canadian beef processing while the market declines in the U.S.

The BSE (mad cow) crisis revealed that farmers in Canada were at the mercy of corporate agribusiness, in particular Tyson, Cargill, and XL Foods, American based Agribusiness corporations.

Alberta is the largest beef producing province in Canada, we have lost our home grown meat packing industry over the last three decades, and are now dominated by 3 American direct marketing Agribusiness Corporations. This has exasperated the impact of the BSE crisis in the province, and as a result Federal and Provincial funds for BSE supplemental payments did not go to farmers but to Tyson, Cargill and XL Foods.

"The farm income crisis is not due to farmer “inefficiencies”, but is in fact attributable to
the dominant market power of a relative handful of very powerful corporations. Nowhere
is this more clearly demonstrated than in the beef processing sector. Over the past two
years, a number of investigations by the House of Commons Agriculture Committee, the
Senate Agriculture Committee, the Alberta Auditor General, and the federal Competition
Bureau, into allegations of excessive profiteering by Cargill, Tyson, XL Foods and other
packing companies have brought to light important information about this sector.
The big players in the Canadian beef packing industry are the federally-inspected plants.
There are currently 19 federally-inspected beef packers in Canada, ranging in size from a
weekly slaughter capacity of 25 head in Lacombe, Alberta, to 22,000 head in Brooks,
Alberta.

The two largest packers, Lakeside (Tyson) and Cargill, are both currently ramping up
capacity by approximately 4000 head per week, further increasing their dominance over
the industry. XL Foods, with its two plants in Moose Jaw and Calgary, is the third largest
player in the game with a combined slaughter capacity of 9,000 head weekly. Better Beef
Ltd. of Ontario is currently the fourth-largest packing plant with a capacity of 8,500
weekly, nearly matching XL’s output.

The Alberta Auditor General’s report, which followed the money trail in the wake of the
Alberta government’s BSE-related assistance programs, was released July 27, 2004. This
report revealed that only three federally-inspected meat packers: Cargill, Tyson
Foods (Lakeside) and XL Foods, controlled “at least 90%” of the capacity in
Alberta. Between 1989 and 2002, thanks to generous financial incentives from the
Alberta government, the province’s feedlot sector grew rapidly, as did its share of the
slaughter capacity for the country. Alberta is the fourth-largest region in North America
(behind Texas, Kansas and Nebraska) for cattle inventory, and is also the fourth largest
cattle-feeding region. Alberta’s cattle on feed inventory peaked at 1.6 million head in
2000. Between 1989 and 2002, Alberta’s cattle slaughter capacity grew by 81%, and
currently the province accounts for 72% of the entire Canadian slaughter industry."
National Farmers Union Submission to the Federal Competition Bureau June, 2005

Regional Consequences of the BSE Crisis By David Kilgour, MP for Edmonton - Mill Woods - Beaumont September, 2004

The immediate banning by the U.S. government of our live animals after one cow in one herd in this province was found to be BSE-positive on May 20, 2003 created a huge oversupply of products. The U.S. had received about four-fifth of our beef exports and almost all of our live cattle; the ban meant catastrophe for most in the industry. It also proved to be a “recipe made in heaven” for the packer subsidiaries of two American food giants; Lakeside (Tyson) in Brooks and Cargill in High River, which were licensed by Washington to sell boneless beef from animals under thirty months of age into the U.S. These two packers now effectively control access to the American market for our entire Western beef export industry, which comprises cow-calf operators, backgrounders and large and small feedlots. In May of 2003, there were seven American plants located within a day’s drive from Prairie Canada. Now there are only the two in southern Alberta which have access to the U.S. Not surprisingly, this has resulted in a huge oversupply of animals overdue for processing across Canada.

PRIME TIME CRIME
Mad Cow and the Canadian Food Industry

Collapse of the Packing House Industry in Alberta
Sets the Conditions for the BSE Crisis

Alberta saw a bust in the meat packing industry in the province begining in the later years of the 1970's as packers diversified into other industries, shut down plants, retired staff and in some cases consolidated holdings through mergers and acquisitons. Such was the case with Gainers.

Tory administrations from the 1970s to the early 1990s tried their hands at diversification, but took risks by using public dollars to prop up existing businesses or to help set up new ones. The province ended up with a long string of financial misadventures involving nearly $2 billion worth of government loans and loan guarantees to businesses. For instance, the province took a $209-million hit by the time Edmonton's Gainers meat-packing plant went under, and lost $164 million in MagCan, a magnesium plant.
Tom Ogle, Edmonton Journal

It was not just an Alberta or Canadian phenomena but one that impacted on the whole industry across North America.

In contrast, a much more rapid consolidation has recently swept beef and pork processing.
Since 1980, the number of slaughter plants has plunged from more than 600 to about 170 for cattle and from more than 500 to about 180 for hogs. The number of meat processing firms has also dwindled rapidly, boosting the market share held by the industry’s largest players, especially among beef processors The rapid consolidation has vaulted the beef processing industry into “highly concentrated” status, the highest rank in the classification scheme the U.S. Department of Justice uses in its antitrust oversight.
The New U.S. Meat Industry
By Alan Barkema, Mark Drabenstott, and Nancy Novack

Following the Leader: IBP and the Restructuring of Canada's Meatpacking Industry
Associate Professor Michael J. Broadway State University of New York at Geneseo
Culture & Agriculture

Spring 1996, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 3-8

Posted online on December 10, 2004.

(doi:10.1525/cag.1996.18.1.3)
View Table of Contents

---

As I wrote in the University of Lethbridge Student paper The Meliroist in 1978 during the Packing House strikes in Canada, the industry had become an interlocking oligopoly.

While CEO's and power brokers on the boards of Gainers, Swifts, Burns and Canada Packers did not sit directly on each others boards, they sat on other corporate boards, in particular GE Canada, where they could meet and collude.

They did this during the Swifts/Canada Packers strike in '78 when Burns would not hire striking workers from Canada Packers in Lethbridge, while having job openings available in their Calgary plant. I am pleased to say my article was used by UFCW in hearings in Ottawa to prove collusion by the big Packing Houses.

At the same time this was the begining of the end of the old Packing House industry, more of it's workers in the U.S. were retired, leaving the packing houses as gravy operations, all capital expansion had been paid off, aside from retirement costs and paying a reduced work force, the packing houses were shear profit makers, allowing companies like Swifts to move from being the company that produced butter ball turkeys for Thanksgiving, to becoming Esmark Corp. a diversified company that owned Wonderbra.

In Canada the meatpacking industry was solidly based in Alberta, with Burns being owned by A.E.Childes of Calgary, Gainers being owned by the Gainer family in Edmonton, and Canada Packers being owned by the Toronto Harris family.

In fact the old Canada Packers plant in Edmonton would be sold to Gainers, when Peter Pocklington owner of the Edmonton Oilers, and switch and bait capitalist crook, took over in the eighties. It had been a Canada Packers plant and then a Swifts Plant. Pocklington bought up Swifts Canada operations and then all the Packing houses in Edmonton under the name of Gainers and consoldated them into one operation, from which he milked the profits and the gouged the workers pension funds to fund his venture capital purchases. He eventually bought up Canbera foods in Southern Alberta, and became for a short time the sole monopoly Agribusiness for tertiary agricultural foods production in Alberta.

"If you can't win, change the rules!" Peter Pocklington

He forced UFCW into a strike at Gainers in 1986, and a bitter labour battle insued at the old Canada Packers Plant known as the Battle of 66th Street. It was a show down between a Conservative Party Capitalist, Pocklington, and the labour movement in Alberta. Pocklington lost, the battle and the war, but in the end so did the workers, as he declared bankruptcy, selling off Gainers to the Alberta Government ,to pay off his loans he owed them, who in turn sold it at fire sale prices to Burns.

The impact of the Gainers Strike cannot be underestimated, it proved once and for all the Tory Government in Alberta was decidedly Anti-Labour. It exposed the neoptism of the Government and its business friends like Pocklington. And it would give rise to the current Klein Reich which vowed never again to be involved in business.


Gainers was a meat-packing company which used to be effectively controlled by Peter Pocklington. Beneficially, he owned all the shares and he was the sole director of Gainers. It encountered financial difficulties and went through a difficult strike. The provincial government loaned it money, in return for many kinds of security, under a master agreement and some ancillary documents. Later another lender demanded more security. The government consented to that happening, in return for some additional security to the government from other Pocklington companies, and a standstill agreement was signed. Ultimately the loan went into default, the government foreclosed, and became the effective owner of Gainers.
Gainers Inc. v. Pocklington Financial Corporation, 2000 ABCA 151


The draconian revamping of class relations, and the gutting of any sense of labour entitlement, was evident in the aftermath of the 1986 Gainers' strike in Edmonton, a six month battle that culminated in the dismantling of the provincial Labour Relations Act that convinced 10,000 Canadian entrepreneurs that Alberta had the least pro-labour legal system in the country. Sections of the new Labour Relations Code made it more and more difficult to secure union certification and allowed the Lieutenant Governor to revoke labour charters if a union participated in a so-called illegal strike.

What, in this context, is the specific threat of globalization? In Alberta, before this term was in common use, Peter Pocklington utlized his capacity to open a meatpacking plant in California to send a threatening message to Gainers strikers. And that should make the essential point. Globalization is not all that new. It is perhaps more intense in our time than it has been in the past, but capital has been global since its birth, regardless of whether we date this in the late 15th century or in the 18th century.
System Failure: The Break-Down of the Post-War Settlement and the Politics of Labour in our Time. Keynote speech delivered by Professor Bryan Palmer on May 7,2004 at the Alberta Federation of Labour membership forum

Peter Pocklington was right about one thing: he is at the centre of a high-level conspiracy coming out of Alberta Treasury Branches. The ATB is, after all, conspiring to get $50 million Pocklington owes it. But the self-made millionaire is wrong about most everything else he's saying about Edmonton and Alberta.

In fact, the man Edmontonians love to hate had better be on the next Greyhound bound for anywhere, before pitch-fork wielding peasants storm his Glenora fortress, drag him behind a horse to Sir Winston Churchill Square and put him in stocks while adults ridicule him, children throw rotten tomatoes at him, blackflies feed off the debris and he fills his pants with a week's accumulation of millionaire droppings.

For years, Edmontonians have been telling this guy to hit the road. As far as some folks are concerned, Pocklington isn't even an Edmontonian, he's a character out of a Dickens novel. Look at the record. The guy started out as a used-car dealer. Anyone can do that, but no one earns much respect.

His behavior, however, went beyond merely tacky. Pocklington became positively hated in some quarters when his employees at Gainers went on strike. Pocklington took advantage of Alberta's anti-union legislation allowing scab workers to replace strikers. The 1986 strike became a lightning rod for labor unrest in Alberta and eventually became one of the most violent labor disputes in the province's history.
Richard Cairney, SEE Magazine:Thursday, July 30th., 1998


Canada Packers was sold to one of the McCain family in the Maritimes who bought Maple Leaf Foods. Burns continued to run the old Gainers plant into the ground and eventually sold it off to Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods over a decade after the Battle of 66th Street, forced UFCW to strike, and used it as an excuse to gut the operations and close the last operating packing house in Edmonton.

Maple Leaf Meats: Time to Bring Home the Bacon

MacDonald questions Minister’s apathy given the Edmonton Edge

It is time for the Minister of Labour to start doing his job and work toward keeping the Maple Leaf hog processing facility in Edmonton, says Alberta Liberal Labour Critic Hugh MacDonald.

MacDonald was referring to Labour Minister Murray Smith’s unwillingness to get involved in the labour dispute between the facility and its workers. “The advantages of upgrading the Edmonton Maple Leaf hog processing facility are many,” said MacDonald. “It is hard to understand why Maple Leaf would even consider leaving Edmonton when the competitive edge is so apparent.”

“The future of one of Edmonton’s oldest processing industries depends on strong forceful mediation between the UFCW and Maple Leaf Foods,” said MacDonald. “The department of labour can provide leadership in this ongoing dispute before it leads to a violent nationwide strike. This game of ‘corporate chicken’ cannot continue.”

“Maple Leaf Foods and Executive Vice-President Patrick Jones, in particular, must realize threats and intimidation will not work to resolve this labour dispute,” said MacDonald. “Let’s not repeat the strike of 1986."

In an interim quarterly report to shareholders in May 1997, Maple Leaf credits a significant part of its 20% increase in operating earnings to its 1996 acquisition of Burns Meats/Gainers. “If this is the case, why is Maple Leaf anxious to abandon their operation in Edmonton?” asked MacDonald.

They forced the UFCW into an untenable national strike, which resulted in the closing of packing plants in Edmonton and Burlington, Ontario, and the opening of a super plant in Brandon, Manitoba. Edmonton packing plant workers got shafted by Maple Leaf Foods and the Alberta government. Albertans got the shaft as the last large scale packing plant that was Canadian owned closed.

Had the government upgraded the old Canada Packers plant on 66th Street, and allowed it to be run by the unionized workers,using their pension fund to capitalize further operations, it would have remained a viable pork operation.

While smaller plant operations began in Red Deer for Pork Production, most of the beef operations in Alberta had already closed down, leaving the field open for
American Agribusiness Corporations like Cargill, XLFoods and Tyson to move in.

Canada Packers Inc.

Canada Packers Inc. formerly, Canada Packers Limited, was formed in 1927 in Toronto,
Ontario through the amalgamation of the Harris Abbatoir Company, Gunns Limited and the William Davies Company - Canada's oldest meat packing company. The architect of this merger was J. Stanley McLean, Secretary-Treasurer of the Harris Abbatoir, who became the first president of Canada Packers Limited, a post he held for 30 years.

The merger of the William Davies Company, Gunns and the Harris Abbatoir Company was largely out of economic necessity. While the 1920s were roaring for everyone else, the meat packing industry was reeling from excess capacity that had been built up during the war. When the post war boom ended in the fall of 1920, packers were unprepared and sustained heavy losses.

The one exception was the Harris Abbatoir Company, whose president James Harris and secretary-treasurer J.S. McLean quickly recognized the war boom was over and moved swiftly to do what had to be done - cut costs and focus their business.

By 1927 the Canadian meat packing industry was in a crisis, the likes of which would not be seen again until the 1980s. At the end of January, Gunns was refused further credit. Without this, the company could not purchase livestock. They approached Harris and in early February all shares of Gunns capital stock were transferred. In June, Harris also acquired from Allied Packers the plants and inventories of The Canadian Packing Company Limited. In August, the shareholders of both Harris Abbatoir Company and William Davies Company agreed to merge their interests into a new holding company called Canada Packers Limited.

For more than 50 years, Canada Packers Inc. dominated the meat processing industry and was a leading researcher, processor and marketer of a wide range of meat and agribusiness products in Canada and abroad through its interests in Britain, Germany and Australia and its international trading group based in Toronto.

However, the 1980s for a number of economic reasons proved to be the most difficult time for the company since 1927. Thanks to geographic and product diversification, Canada Packers was able to withstand the serious blow to its beef business.

By 1990, when Canada Packers merged with Maple Leaf Mills to form Maple Leaf Foods, the company had exited the beef business and refocused its meat business on pork and poultry. Maple Leaf Foods today is Canada's leading pork processor and a global competitor. Maple Leaf's Prime poultry is Canada's leading brand.

As this article shows the Gainers plant ( which was the old Canada Packers Plant) was a viable operation until it was closed and gutted by Maple Leaf for its equipment. The plant could have been upgraded, had the Klein government bothered to spend money on it instead of selling it off to Burns.

Canada Packers Plant - North Edmonton
By Ivan Hall, P.Eng. ASHRAE NAC Historian

A short article in a May, 2001 edition of the Edmonton Journal rekindled my interest in this facility; now gone. I had taken some photos of the inside of the power plant when it was being demolished; not knowing its illustrious origin or innovative past. It was, for all intents and purposes, a well known industrial plant that had seen better days and was now gone.

In fact it had exploded onto the Edmonton landscape in 1936 in the midst of the Great Depression. The sheer size of the facility made a huge impact on the city at that time. It immediately received national accolades for its innovative design and went on to serve this community for 50 years; employing more than 1000 during its peak production years from the 1950's to '70's.

According to writeups in the Edmonton Journal throughout 1936, Edmonton had targeted for a major meat packing plant since 1927. At that time, virtually all the western Canadian meat packing was concentrated in Winnipeg; more specifically St. Boniface, Manitoba. Canadian packers were vying after the British bacon trade which was supplied by Denmark by more than a 3:1 ratio over Canada.

The Depression had deferred serious planning for such a move as companies fought for their very survival. When finally begun, both design staff and Canada Packers staff worked for almost two years to ensure strategic placement of equipment was synchronized with production flow. Experts in the various departments were asked to critique space allotments as well as interdependent process flows and overall functionality. These reviews resulted in the construction of a scale model for presentation to the owners prior to letting of tenders for the work.

The plant architects were a partnership of Professor Eric R. Arthur, head of architecture at the University of Toronto and A. P. C. Adamson. It made use of the International Modernists style of exterior presentation. Their design was described as a balanced asymmetry composed of abstract cubes constructed with a reinforced concrete frame and unrelieved brick curtain wall laid in the German garden bond pattern. Their efforts won them the gold medal of merit in 1936 from the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada ( RAIC) and the Ontario Association of Architects (OAA).

Facilities in the United States, Great Britain and Denmark were toured and many equipment manufacturers were questioned in order to perfect the design of this 'to-be' state of the art plant. Everything from the type of flooring to lighting intensity to size and type of mechanical equipment was taken into account. Unlike European designs that were generally horizontal operations interconnected with moving belts or trucks, the designers followed the American practice of moving production vertically with minimal horizontal movement. From the killing floor, carcasses moved from the third floor to finished product emerging on the main floor. Gravity chutes and short horizontal moving chains reduced handling and speeded processing of perishable product.

Sod turning took place March 16, 1936 and the plant was operationally completed September 14, 1936; although the official opening did not occur till November 4, 1936. At its peak construction period, almost 400 tradesmen in 35 trades were employed on the million dollar project. The contract was awarded to Bird Construction Limited - then of Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan. It was very welcomed relief from the Depression and challenged the trades that had been virtually idle for years. Special note was made of the bricklayers, most of whom had been unemployed for four years, who had to relay the boiler house brick because it did not initially meet inspections.

Notable subtrades included Dominion Bridge Ltd. for structural steel, S.B. Noble Electric for electrical and the Highlands Tinshop for sheet metal and ventilation. Even the University of Alberta was drawn into the project; professor Harry Webb performed rebar steel and concrete testing using the university test facilities. Statistically the structure contained 1.1 million bricks, 6 hundred thousand board feet of lumber, 2 hundred and twenty thousand sections of tile, 14 thousand tons of concrete, 22 thousand feet of pipe and 50 miles of electrical wire in 12 miles of conduit; to quote just a few.

Of particular note was the Spanish cork used to insulate the coolers and freezers. Thirteen carloads of cork arrived in time for the project, despite Spain being embroiled in open civil war. Each cooler received a 4 inch thick layer of cork on the walls and ceiling while the freezers received a similar 6 inch layer treatment.

For ASHRAE, the main interest is the power plant. It contained, amongst other things, the refrigeration plant. This cooling plant was based on 3-75 ton Carbondale duplex ammonia compressors for the 'high temperature' cooling and 1-50 ton booster compressor for the 'low temperature' or sub freezing work. Each was driven by a Canadian General Electric synchronous motor, direct coupled to the compressors. The DC power was provided by a motor-generator set. These were supplemented by a large Linde compressor and several York compressors. The Linde was, in turn, replaced with Vilter screw compressors. There were 2 Baltimore Aircoil cooling towers on the roof of the power house which provided chilled water to the shell and tube ammonia condensers; one large and one small. The larger tower was converted to an evaporative condenser in the '70's.

The plant manufactured its own ice using an ice making machine that consisted of a large water drum and press; the walls of the drum being subcooled by ammonia refrigerant. Water was sprayed on to the drum and immediately formed ice crystals on the drum walls. An auger arrangement with several 'knives' continuously scrapped the crystals off which were carried out of the drum by the water and into the press. The press produced 2-ounce briquettes from the crystals at a rate of over 1 ton per hour. Fifty tons of ice were produced daily and was led by chutes into waiting refrigerated rail cars for rapid, planned loading of fresh product for shipment across the continent. In later years only flake ice was produced.

The power plant also contained the three large Babcock & Wilcox steam boilers, which were fired on natural gas - rather innovative for the times. Steam was generated for process steam for sterilizing and scalding, as well as for heating. Electricity came from local utility power. There was a large BroomWade air compressor and condenser/drier supplemented with an Ingersoll Rand air compressor; both to supply compressed process air.

Apart from the main abattoir and packing operations, the plant contained a chemical laboratory for safety and quality testing, facilities for 'pickling' and smoking meat, hide curing cellars, edible and inedible fat rendering and a vegetable oil refining plant. This was believed to be western Canada's first vegetable oil refinery. Here cottonseed, peanut, palm, coconut, sesame ad corn oils were refined for sale. Crude vegetable oils arrived in sixty thousand pound rail tank cars to supply the refinery.

Notables attending the opening included premier Aberhart, Arthur Meighan- leader of the senate, J.S. McLean - president of Canada Packers and J.A. Clarke - mayor of Edmonton. Wilton B. Tranter, general manager of the plant stated fully 200 households would benefit from direct employment in the facility. C. J. Long, an English-born engineer was superintendent of the plant and had worked side by side with the design team from its initial development. It is interesting to note that housewives were specifically targeted to tour the plant on opening day. Copies of Canada Packers booklet, " Tasty Meals for Every Day" were liberally distributed. The "Maple Leaf" brand of shortening, sliced bacon and hams was being deliberately established.

Thus started a major meat packing industry in Edmonton. It would eventually grow to four major plants including Burns, Swift and Gainers and become a major industrial sector for Edmonton; joining agriculture, oil refining and transportation. The small city (then only 90,000) would, over the next half century, rise to a position of dominance in the prairie region of Canada. The Canada Packers plant was, unwittingly, a harbinger of success to come.

acknowledgements:
- Eugene Chorneyko, retired operating engineer, Canada Packers
- Reg Bruce, RET, Pace Refrigeration
- Mike Sadava, Edmonton Journal
- Ib Froberg, retired plant supervisor, Canada Packers


The integration of the American packing plant operations in Alberta, where they own feed stock, that is their own beef, their monoploy in the beef market, where independent farmers have no recourse but to sell to Tyson or Cargill, is what exasperated the BSE crisis in the province.

The faliure of the Alberta government, after the Gainers debacle, to assure producers, packing plant workers , and consumers, that we had an indigenous home grown packing plant operations for Beef, created the crisis we now face with the border closings to Alberta beef.

After the beef has left the farm the government is busy trying to close the gate. What Alberta needs is an indigenous producer/worker cooperative operating our own packing houses. This would allow for real competition in the market place now dominated by two American packing houses. Whose profit ratios last year were boosted by the corporate welfare cheques they got from the Alberta and Canadian Governments, money that would have been better spent on creating the infrastructure that Pocklington and the Klein government so gleefuly destroyed in the ninties.

Farming co-op forges ahead

Last updated Jul 26 2005 10:56 AM MDT CBC News

A farming cooperative in Northern Alberta is going ahead with plans to build its own meat processing facility. Members of the Peace Country Tender Beef Co-op say they're not deterred by the long-awaited reopening of the American border to Canadian cattle. The co-op was conceived during the protracted border closure and industry upheaval which started with the discovery of a case of Mad Cow disease in 2003. It has grown to about 600 members. Member Seth Barnfield says the past few years have taught him that Canadians need to become less dependent on the United States. "We've got to get more value added, we've got to get more processing in our country or we're going to be behind it all the time," he said. "We're seeing it all the time, we're shipping everything out, like our lumber, and we're just killing our small communities." The co-op is converting a curling club in the small town of Berwyn into a meat processing plant due to open this fall. The organization is also working with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency on plans for a new slaughter house for 2006. The Canadian cattle industry was decimated by the closure of the U.S. border. Exports losses have been tagged at $7 billion. The federal government and the provinces poured more than $2.5 billion to keep the industry afloat.

PRIVATIZING INSPECTIONS = BSE CRISIS

In the United States the Reagan regime in the eighties relaxed the requirement of Federal Meat Inspections, another attempt to get the government out of business, leaving the Meat Packers to do self inspections. The result has been an increase of cases of e-coli in food that have made news headlines for causing death and injury to consumers.

At least on two occasions prior to the BSE crisis, e-coli outbreaks in the United States were blamed on Federally inspected beef from Canada, and CBS 60 Minutes pointed their fingers to Alberta as the culprit. The company was Iowa Beef Producers (IBP) , which originally owned the non-union Lakeside Packers in Brooks, and was mixing meat from Alberta with its American beef, and selling it in the US. IBP sold Lakeside to Tyson.

The reality however was that the companies involved were mixing Federally inspected Canadian meat with their tainted self inspected American meat. But because it was ground beef, there was no way of identifying it as Canadian Beef or American Beef. Such is the interlocking connections between the packing houses in Canada and the US and the interlocking connections between Canadian Beef production and American Beef production. They both feed into the American market.

What the cattlemen detest most is the meat inspection system. The story of how Upton Sinclair muckraked the slaughterhouses some one hundred years ago and Teddy Roosevelt jumped in and fixed them all up is pretty much fiction. The simple fact is the meat inspection system isn't any good and anybody who even attempts to stand up to the Big Boy ranchers does so at his or her peril. Look what happened to Bill Lehman, who throughout the early 1990s worked as a meat inspector at Sweetgrass, Montana, a busy port of entry for Canadian beef. By his own count, Lehman himself rejected "up to 2.3 million pounds of contaminated or mislabeled imports annually." The reasons, according to Lehman, included "pus-filled abscesses, sticky layers of bacteria leaving a stench, obvious fecal contamination, stains, metal shavings, blood, bruises, hair, hide, chemical residues, salmonella, added substances, and advanced disease symptoms."

After some children died from an E. coli outbreak in the 90s, Lehman told about his work: "I merely walk to the back of the truck. That's all I'm allowed to do. Whether there's boxed meat or carcasses in the truck, I can't touch the boxes. I can't open the boxes. I can't use a flashlight. I can't walk into the truck. I can only look at what is visible in the back of the trailer." He told one interviewer how he did his inspections: "I've just inspected over 80,000 pounds of meat (boxed beef rounds and boxed boneless beef briskets) on two trucks. I wasn't running or hurrying either. One was bound for Santa Fe Springs, California, the other for San Jose, California. I just stamped on their paperwork 'USDA Inspected and Passed' in 45 seconds."

Mondo Washington
by James Ridgeway
Slaughterhouse Politics
Ranchers Fought Rules That Might Have Prevented Mad Cow
Village Voice, December 31, 2003 - January 6, 2004

In Alberta following in the footsteps of the Republicans south of the border, the Alberta Government spent the ninties privatizing and outsourcing many government operations it considered expendable. One of those was the Livestock Inspection Services. It first reduced funding for these services, limited the hiring of Inspectors, then it privatized the service. It put the commercial agribusiness sector in charge of self policing through the privatized LIS. The Privatized LIS obviously missed inspecting feedlots in Alberta for animal parts in the feed, which was banned at the same time as LIS was privatized. The result was that cattle in Alberta have not been properly inspected for BSE nor has effective inspection been conducted on those businesses represented on the Board of Directors of LIS.

How LIS Got Started
In 1992, the Government of Alberta created the Livestock Advisory Committee. This committee had representatives from the Alberta Auction Markets Association, the Feeders Association of Alberta, the Western Stock Growers, the Alberta Cattle Feeders Association, the Alberta Cattle Commission and the Alberta Livestock Dealers and Order Buyers Association. The Livestock Advisory Committee recommended the privatization of livestock inspection and related activities. This initiative was consistent with the Crown’s goal of wanting to facilitate business and industry. The passing of Bill 41 in the spring of 1998 allowed for a contract between a private company (LIS) and the Crown to unfold. The Board of Directors is represented by Alberta's livestock associations to give equal voice to each and every part of the livestock industry.


The neopotism continues with the new Minister of Agriculture Doug Horner whose cousin , Craig Horner of the Alberta Beef Producers sits on the LIS board of directors. Craig is the son of right-wing politician Jack Horner, the Alberta Cowboy in Ottawa. Doug is the son of Hugh Horner, former provincial Agriculture Minister, and brother of Jack. They don't represent farmers and producers as much as they represent the agribusiness interests that the farmers sell to.

Horner follows late father into agriculture portfolio

Jeff Holubitsky
The Edmonton Journal
November 25, 2004
EDMONTON - When Doug Horner found out he was going to be Alberta's agriculture minister, one of the first things he did was arrange to have his late father's desk moved into his new legislature office.

"He has the same desk that dad had when he was minister of agriculture," Horner's constituency manager Carol Stewart said Wednesday, shortly after Premier Ralph Klein announced the makeup of Alberta's new cabinet.

"He's extremely happy that it's agriculture, because he knows and loves agriculture," she said.

Horner's family and business backgrounds make the appointment appropriate.

His father was Dr. Hugh Horner, Alberta's agriculture minister from 1971 to 1975, and one of the young politicians who linked arms with Peter Lougheed to change the province's political landscape more than three decades ago. Hugh Horner, who also served as deputy premier, died in 1997.

Doug Horner's father was not his only political connection. The new minister was not available for comment Wednesday because he was travelling to attend the funeral of his uncle, Jack Horner, the colourful former federal politician who crossed the floor of the House of Commons to join the Trudeau government in 1977.

Horner, 43, was an international grain trader with a business education and banking background when he was first elected to represent Spruce Grove-Sturgeon-St. Albert in 2001.

During this whole BSE crisis in Alberta no-one has challenged the failure of the privatized LIS to do its job. Had the LIS remained a public service, the howls from the Tories and their Agribusiness friends would have been loud and voracious about the failure of the LIS inspectors to do their jobs. And it would have been used as a bully pulpit for right wing attacks on the public sector. However now that the LIS is privatized, with its neoptistic connections in the Alberta Government and the agribusiness lobby, the silence has been defeaning

AGRIBUSINESS INTERGRATED FEEDLOTS=BSE

The third aspect of how the BSE crisis was homegrown in Alberta is the lack of inspections of feedlots and the dominance of the feedlot business by integrated agribusiness monopolies. Along with cattle feed, they produce and mill other feed, sell fertilizers, raise cattle and pork, chickens, etc.

These companies use Alberta to host cows from across Canada for feeding prior to being sent to slaughter. In the globalized economy they operate in many countries, dealing with integrated operations raising a variety of farm animals prior to their going to packing plants.

Sometimes they contract directly with a packing house, who then can claim their animals as their own, which was one of the reasons that Tyson and Cargill were able to profit from generous BSE grants that should have gone to farmers.

Alberta houses hundreds of thousands of heads of cattle, in its feedlot operations, including cattle from the U.S. When BSE was discovered in cows in the U.S. they claimed their animals were from Alberta, in effect because they had been fattened up here in a feedlot. At the same time Feedlot inspections by LIS were being privatized, feedlots were expanding their operations here in Alberta.

Canada Gears UP
Rick Purnell
Sep 1, 1999

It wasn't long after commercial cattle feeding began in the U.S. that Canada got in the game. It's proven to be a viable player. Alberta alone is fifth in cattle feeding behind Texas, Kansas, Nebraska and Colorado. Anne Dunford, senior marketing analyst with CanFax in Calgary, Alberta, says commercial cattle feeding began in the late 1960s. During the early '70s, about 500,000 head were fed annually. Today it's 2.4 million head. "Growth has been primarily fueled by ample feed supplies and the proximity to feeder cattle," Dunford says. Approximately 80% of the national cow herd is located on the nearby prairies. She adds that 250 feedlots in Alberta have feeding capacity greater than 1,000 head. These represent 90% of the fed cattle marketed in Alberta. Average capacity of these feedlots is 6,280. The largest holds 102,000 head and three operate with a capacity of 75,000 head.
Economics
Finished cattle mostly end up at packing plants in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario or at U.S. plants in Washington, Utah, Idaho and Colorado. Selling methods include sealed bids, private treaty, formula or grid pricing and forward contracts. Estimates show about 14% of the 1998 fed cattle supply was packer-owned. Despite normal industry consolidation, industry leaders display a relatively bright outlook for feeding in Alberta and the surrounding region. Ron Axelson, manager of Alberta Cattle Feeders Association, says several factors point toward growth. One is environmental regulation.
"Currently, there are no existing environmental laws pertaining specifically to feedyards," Axelson says. "We're governed by laws under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act and the Health Act. These come into play if an event contaminates water sources or puts public health at risk. That's not to say regulations are lax - there are examples of action being taken by the authorities in justified instances."

Lax environmental laws, lax inspections, the privatization of LIS and its failure to implement a BSE inspection of feedlots, the Alberta Advantage of the Klein government is directly responsible for the BSE crisis we now face.

Alberta officially has forty percent of the cattle but just over seventy-percent of all Canadian cattle are fed here. That's because other provinces send their cattle here for the final months of feeding ... on feedlots.

There are four thousand feedlots in Alberta, and most of them are small.

But there are thirty-three feedlots with over 10-thousand head of cattle each, and those larger feedlots represent more than half of the beef production here.

Some people call them factory farms. The people who own them prefer the term intensive livestock operations.

Alberta is at the centre for a few reasons: Ottawa abolished a fee called the Crow Rate in the early 90s, and suddenly the price of feed dropped.

And two big U.S. slaughterhouses moved into Alberta, Cargil in High Prarie ... and Iowa Beef Producers, later Tysons, in Brooks. So the beef industry here is essentially self-contained. CBC Radio The Current 2003

And here is an irony the Americans who are lobbying to halt live Canadian cattle being imported into the U.S. are using our feedlots for their own cattle, which they are selling to Cargill and Tyson.

US Appeals court reserves on mad cow decision
A U.S. federal appeals court has reserved its decision after being asked to overturn a temporary injunction keeping the border closed to live Canadian cattle.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture had been ready to reopen the border on March 7, but the ranchers' lobby group R-CALF convinced a Montana judge to block that decision, arguing that Canada doesn't adequately test for mad cow disease.

Editorial from Denver Post July 16
Sensible ruling on beef imports

How do you spell hypocrites: R-CALF, read on.

The Alberta Express Playing both sides of the field

08.23.2004

By Sheena Read To sue or not to sue, that is the question. At least it is for a group of Alberta feedlot owners and ranchers who are taking the stand that some American cattle owners are operating under questionable practices by buying cattle in Canada and profiting from a closed border situation. In July, a group of southern Alberta feedlot owners prepared to roadblock a shipment of 250 head of beef destined for Cargill Foods in High River from Chinook Feeders near Nanton. These cattle had been discovered to be owned by members of Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA), an American lobby group that has been actively trying to keep Canadian beef out of the USA, and to keep the borders closed. The cattle had only been in the Chinook Feeders lot for three weeks, and had been flipped through several owners in what the Alberta feedlot owners say is an effort to disguise who the real owners are. The cattle had come in weighing an average of 1180 pounds, and went out three weeks later at 1215. When the owners of Chinook Feeders discovered what they had been feeding, and what was about to go to Cargill, they passed the word along and the roadblock was scheduled. As word leaked out regarding the impending roadblock the shipment was cancelled, only to be re-scheduled and processed later. This marked an end to Cargill processing R-CALF cattle in Canada. “We will not knowingly purchase or take on or do business with cattle directly or indirectly associated with R-CALF members or those affiliated with R-CALF,” says Cargill spokesman Robert Meijer. Meijer says that Cargill is counting on help in identifying where those cattle are, and this is going to be a hard task in light of the rapid changing of owners. “Everyone’s got to work together on this.” This is now a Canadian-based policy, which does not extend across the border to American cattle on American soil. It will be in place, Meijer says, until the border opens to Canadian beef. “We don’t accept the position that R-CALF has taken in the US,” says Meijer. There are an estimated 80,000 head of American cattle sitting in feedlots in Alberta right now. In May, R-CALF successfully lobbied to block additional exports of Canadian beef into the US, citing that there was a question of the safety of Canadian beef. A Montana district court judge placed a temporary restraining order on importing of beef products, which was followed by the United States Department of Agriculture and R-CALF reaching an agreement where the USDA will not reintroduce more products until a decision is made on the proposed rule to import these products, live cattle and beef from cattle over 30 months. The issue of questionable practices comes from when the cattle were first purchased by the R-CALF members. Some of these 80,000 were bought last fall, but 300 to 400 head were bought as recently as Feb. 28, causing speculation that the R-CALF members were expecting the border to open to Canadian beef in spring, as was anticipated, and were planning on profiting off the Canadian BSE-induced low prices. What threw a wrench into the plan was the discovery of the second BSE-infected cow in Washington State that had Canadian origins. This delayed the border opening, and also delayed the moving of those 80,000 head across the border to much higher sale prices. The question remains on what to do with the American cattle sitting in the feedlots. Canadian Cattlemen for Fair Trade spokesman and feedlot owner Rick Paskal says, “Who cares what happens to them? It’s not a question of them being treated inhumanely.” The consensus between some of the feedlot owners during an August 12 press conference is that the animals will continue to be fed, and the R-CALF owners will continue to be billed for that. The cattle can also be removed and placed on hay and will continue to be healthy animals. Left long enough, they will become oxen, and can be used to plow fields, they joke. If feed bills cannot be paid by the R-CALF owners, then ownership rights will transfer to the feedlots. Larry Nolan of Nolan Cattle has about 200 head of R-CALF cattle in his lots. On Aug. 10 he received an offer from the owner to have ownership signed over into his name. “I guess they’re getting pretty frustrated,” he says, because nobody will slaughter them. “I’ve been offered a good price on them,” Nolan says, but he refused it. He doesn’t want to get stuck with them either. “We don’t want anyone slaughtering these cattle, even if it’s third hand,” Nolan says. John vander Heyden has three feedlots in Picture Butte operating at a third of capacity. He doesn’t have any of the R-CALF cattle in his lots, but he’d like to, just for the opportunity to get some enjoyment out of having those cattle in his lot and watching the rising feed bills that will make the R-CALF people squirm. “If our beef is supposed to be so unsafe, what the blazes are they doing coming up here and buying thousands and thousands of cattle?” he asks. He adds that those R-CALF buyers were “drooling for the opportunity to make money off keeping the border closed. It strictly has nothing to do with science, and everything to do with profit.” It goes against everything that vander Heyden believes in. “We do business very honourably in our three feedlots. You do what’s right,” and that’s a way of life still in the cattle industry, where a handshake is still as good as gold, he says. Allan Lively of Highwood-Pincher Creek Livestock Auction says he will not knowingly sell any of the R-CALF animals. “It would be political suicide,” he says. Lively is of mixed thoughts on the R-CALF situation. On one hand, he thinks that because the R-CALF animals are fats, they wouldn’t be moving through the auctions. He doesn’t think there are many R-CALF animals left in Alberta though, and thinks that many have been sold and processed even before the animals were discovered at Chinook Feeders. Chances are slim, though, that animals would have been recognized as being R-CALF, after being sold and re-sold as they have been. However, Lively says if there’s one thing that this situation has done, it has made the auction markets in High River and Pincher Creek more aware of what cattle are coming in, and they are checking them more closely. R-CALF is a non-profit organization founded in 1998, which now has 10,000 members in 46 states. Its mandate is to represent US cattle industry in national and international trade issues and to ensure continued profitability and viability of US cattle producers. Its founding case in 1998 was filing a live cattle and anti-dumping (selling at below the cost of production) case against Canada and Mexico, and a countervailing (subsidizing) case against Canada. Vander Heyden says that his operation was one of those investigated. Although the case was eventually settled in favour of the Canadian operators, and no wrongdoing was found, the issue still cost thousands of dollars and lost hours to deal with.

Agribusiness and its friends in the Klein government are directly responsible for the BSE crisis we now face. The failure to save our indigenous packing houses, the outsourcing of the LIS to the business interests they were supposed to inspect, the failure to inspect and regulate feedlots, all of it contributed to the current crisis and all of it can be laid at the door of the Klein government.

The Alberta BSE crisis, as was the case in Thatchers England, is the direct result of privatization. And it has only been in Alberta that any cattle with BSE have been found. Yet the impact has been felt across the country.

But the chickens have come home to roost. Unfortuntely when this govenment got hoisted on its own petard for the past two years those who have suffered the most are neither the politicians or their relatives and pals in the agribusiness industry. It was the farmers and workers who got the shaft of this petard.

And now it looks like with a strike imminent at Tysons Lakeside Plant in Brooks, thanks to this governments anti-labour laws, farmers will face another crisis this summer.

Like the BSE crisis, one created by the government that says it speaks for them.

Celebrating Mad Cow Disease:

The absurdity of protectionism

By Miriam Martin

Corporate History of an Integrated Feedlot Agribusiness

Ridley Inc. (Feed-Rite Mills).

Ridley Inc. was founded in Winnipeg, Manitoba as Feed-Rite Mills Ltd. in 1939 by Cyril L. "Andy" Anderson. As a veterinary nutritionist Andy Anderson was an early proponent of scientifically formulated feed rations for improving the productivity of livestock herds and poultry flocks. Anderson's success was based on a strategy to deliver animal nutrition, health and livestock management products in any form required by the livestock producing customer. Feed-Rite grew gradually after the Second World-War, building new feed production plants in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta and eventually became the largest feed production company in Western Canada.

In 1994 privately held Feed-Rite was acquired by the Ridley Corporation Limited, the largest animal feed producer and salt refiner in Australia. As a publicly traded company, (ASX:RIC) Ridley had been seeking growth opportunities beyond its traditional Australian markets and Feed-Rite was its first international acquisition. With a new management structure, Ridley set about to grow its North American investment through further acquisitions in Canada and the U.S., most notably the acquisition in 1997 of Hubbard Milling that doubled the size of Feed-Rite's production capacity. (See A Brief History of Hubbard Feeds.)

Feed-Rite has since been renamed Ridley Inc. and now trades as a public company on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Ridley employs more than 1,000 people and manages 34 production operations in Canada, the U.S. and swine breeding facilities in the U.K., Canada and Germany. The company continues to build on strengths of adding value to bulk commodities by applying its technology and expertise to the handling, processing, marketing and distribution of its products. Ridley's commitment to quality products and customer service was the impetus for achieving ISO 9001 certification for the Winnipeg feed manufacturing plant and distribution center in 1997, the first feed production plant in North America to achieve ISO 9001 certification. After more than 60 years from Andy Anderson's first formulated animal rations, Ridley Inc. remains deeply committed to its customers in the livestock industry.

Significant events in the history of Ridley Inc.


1939
Feed-Rite Mills Ltd., established by C. L. Anderson, begins producing feed from a single plant on Higgins Avenue in downtown Winnipeg, Manitoba.

1967
Feed-Rite builds second feed plant in Brandon, Manitoba.

1975
Feed-Rite builds third feed plant in Humboldt, Saskatchewan.

1977
Feed-Rite begins construction of a new large-capacity plant in the St. Boniface district of Winnipeg, renown for its concentration of meat packing plants.

1978
Feed-Rite acquires an existing feed mill from Solar Feeds in Manitou, Manitoba.

1981
Feed-Rite moves head office administrative staff to the St. Boniface plant and closes the old downtown Winnipeg plant.

1984
Feed-Rite expands its reach of operations into Alberta with a new plant in Linden, Alberta.
Constructs a fully automated micro ingredient premix plant adjacent to the St. Boniface feed plant.

1987
Feed-Rite builds new feed plant in Arborg, Manitoba.

1988
Under a World Bank contract Feed-Rite constructs a micro premix plant for the Beijiao Poultry Company in Beijiao, Guangdong province of the People’s Republic of China.
Feed-Rite builds a premix plant in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, a premix plant and store in Red Deer, Alberta and a feed supply store and warehouse in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan.

1990
Feed-Rite builds new feed plant in St. Paul, Alberta.

1992
Feed-Rite obtains the exclusive production and marketing rights in Western Canada of Cotswold purebred swine stock. Cotswold Western Canada Ltd. established to produce and market the pigs from a hog facility in Malonton, Manitoba.

1993
Feed-Rite constructs feed mill and farm supply store in New Liskeard, Ontario, center of the Clay Belt farming region of northern Ontario. Under a World Bank contract Feed-Rite constructs a micro premix plant for the Shanghai Poultry & Egg Company in Shanghai, Peoples’ Republic of China.

1994
Ridley Corporation Ltd. acquires privately-held Feed-Rite Ltd. Based in Sydney, Australia, Ridley is Australia’s largest feed manufacturer and salt producer.

1995
Feed-Rite Ltd. acquires Quality Feeds Alberta Ltd., of Lacombe, Alberta.

1996
Feed-Rite acquires Green Valley Feed Service Ltd. of Grunthal, Manitoba and Farmix Ltd., a livestock premix manufacturer based in Mitchell, Ontario.
Feed-Rite USA, Inc., acquires the assets of Zip Feed Mills, Inc., including feed production plants located in Sioux Falls and Huron, South Dakota and Grandin, North Dakota.

1997
Feed-Rite acquires the Western Canadian operations of Daco Laboratories Limited, a livestock premix manufacturer with plants in Lethbridge, Alberta and Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Ridley Corporation acquires the feed production assets formerly owned by the Hubbard Milling Company, Inc. of Mankato, Minnesota, renamed as Hubbard Feeds Inc.
Feed-Rite Ltd. changes name to Ridley Canada Ltd. and issues common stock publicly trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (RCL).

1998
Ridley Canada Ltd. acquires Macleod Feed Mill Ltd. of Fort Macleod, Alberta.
Acquires the assets of PM Ag Product's Inc.s low-moisture block business in Texas, Indiana and Oregon and consolidates it with existing block operations of Hubbard Feeds.
Acquires the Cotswold Pig Development Company Limited which controls world-wide franchise rights for Cotswold pig breeding stock.
Acquires the feed business assets of Gringer Feed & Grain of Iowa City, Iowa.
Changes name to Ridley Inc. to reflect geographically expanded scope of operations.

2000
Acquires the feed production assets of the Animal Nutrition Division ("Wayne Feeds") of ContiGroup Companies (Continental Grain Company). Included in the acquisition are twelve plants located in Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Iowa and North Carolina.

2002
Sells European operations of U.K. based Cotswold Pig Development Company Limited to JSR Newsham Limited. Continues U.S. and Canadian swine breeding operations independently as Cotswold Swine Genetics.
Acquires 50% shareholding in McCauley Bros., Inc., a manufacturer of specialty horse feeds based in Versailles, Kentucky.
Acquires 100% of shares of feed and premix manufacturer, Shamrock Feeds Ltd. of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

2003
Acquires feed milling assets of Heartland, Inc. of Bismarck, North Dakota.
Sells Cotswold Swine Genetics business to PIC (Sygen International).

Save Our Grizzly Bears

In Alberta the government continues to allow the sport hunting of these endangered animals, for no good reason except it brings in big bucks for some outfitter pals of King Ralph. Of course humans are responsible for their decline, we are their only natural enemies. And as the government allows for recreational expansion into the wilderness, their territory is threatened. And they will come in contact with humans who insist on colonizing the wilderness for their 'enjoyment'.


Humans leading cause of death for grizzlies, report finds
Last Updated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:31:41 EDT
CBC News

The main cause of death for grizzlies living in the Rockies is their interaction with humans, an 11-year study into the bears' population trends has found.

The Eastern Slopes Grizzly Bear Project tracked bears living in the Banff and Kananaskis areas for more than a decade. Only one-quarter of female grizzlies and just over 10 per cent of male grizzlies die of natural causes, the study's authors found.

Human interaction, either directly or indirectly, is the main cause of death, Stephen Herrero, a professor of environmental design with the University of Calgary, said. Alberta has closed trails this summer to protect people from grizzly bear attacks.

Their habitat is being eroded, the bears are getting hit by cars, they're hunted – both legally and illegally – and when the animals become a serious enough problem in an area they're either shot or moved to another location.

As well, researchers found the annual birth-rate for bears in Banff and Kananaskis is the lowest in North America. Grizzlies are being driven from their most productive habitats and are, literally, eating garbage.

Poor nutrition is a contributing factor to the low birth rate, the report's authors said. When bears live so close to people, it's easier for them to dine at the local dump than in alpine meadows, the researchers said. Herrero advocates programs to address food and garbage attractants to prevent grizzlies from getting into trouble.

He's also in favour of having the bears' status changed to "threatened" in Alberta. The change would mean no hunting, and greater restrictions on road construction in grizzly habitat.

"Grizzly bear hunting can be maintained sustainably, but it can only be maintained sustainably if we put it in a context of addressing all the other causes of mortality," he said.

No it can't. There should be no bear hunting period. As Liberal opposition critic Bill Bonko has said:Liberal Critic Calls for Greater Protection for Grizzly Habitat

It's up to governments to decide what price they're willing to pay to make sure grizzlies survive in the Rocky Mountains, such as closing recreational trails for a few days or shutting off large tracts of land from oil and gas activity, forestry, coal mining or other industry, he said.

That's a cop out, the Klein government will take industrial development over protecting wildlife any day. That's why they opened up Kananaskis in the first place, for the Winter games and a golf course. Yep get out and enjoy the wilderness while putting around.

"Bears are under more pressure now than ever," agreed Nigel Douglas of the Alberta Wilderness Association. "We're sort of pushing and pushing and pushing the places where bears live. And some time we need to start saying enough's enough, and we need to take a step back and leave some room for the bears."

* FROM JULY 6, 2005: Alberta closes trails to keep people away from bears

Last week, the province moved to close a number of trails in provincial parks around Canmore and Kananaskis, saying they wanted to keep people away from bear habitats.

A Canmore woman was killed in early June when she was attacked by a grizzly while out running near a golf course.

Yes she was running in an area that had been blocked off due to the fact that Grizzly bears were out and about in the area. Being arrogant she and her friends ignored the signs and the result was she was killed. Being a young bruin the bear didn't know that the golf course was off limits.

The province said the decision to close the trails and allow them to grow over was not triggered by the mauling death of a jogger last month. On June 5, Isabelle Dube was running with two friends near the Silver Tip Golf Course in Canmore when they encountered a grizzly. Her friends backed away, while Dube, a 36-year-old mother of two, climbed a tree. When wildlife officers reached the scene, Dube had been killed. Those who knew her said Dube, a competitive mountain biker, would not want to see the trails closed.The province said 200 kilometres of trails in parks in the Canmore area will remain open for walkers, runners and cyclists.

As usual some of the community expressed the speciesism that given a choice between humans and bears they supported humans being stupid. Like those who still insist it is their god given right to trespass in Grizzly territory, for their Olympic aspirations, and their Olympian egos.

What part of Wild in Wilderness don't these little colonialists understand?

Not all of the citizens in Canmore are anti-bear, there is a campaign going on to actually make Canmore bear friendly.

Was killer Canmore handled properly?

The headline in today’s (June 7, 2005) Calgary Herald – “Was the killer bear handled properly?” – only hints at the complexity of factors that led to the tragic deaths of Isabelle Dubé and Bear #99 last Sunday. The real question, and answer, may rely less on handling bears than it does on handling people and human development.

And of course as a result of ignoring the warning that the trail was closed, resulted in the useless death of the Grizzly. Why, cause he was being a wild animal of course. And not a particulary aggressive one. But he got killed for having reacted to something these humans did, including being where they should not have been.

A wildlife officer, accompanied by one of the women, returned to the site of the attack, where the officer killed the bear with a single shot.
Bear relocated in May
Fish and Wildlife officials said the 90-kilogram, four-year-old male bear had been captured and moved out of the area at the end of May, after continually visiting the golf course and after it approached a woman. The woman and her small dog backed away slowly and the bear left.The bear was relocated not because of any aggressive behaviour, but as a way of discouraging it from approaching populated areas, said Ealey. With wildlife officers tracking it, the bear travelled from Banff National Park back to the Canmore area – about 15 kilometres over rugged terrain – in a few days.Ealey said the bear hadn't shown any aggressive behaviours since it returned. "The bear was not aggressive, it behaved as a bear its typical age and sex would," Ealey said when asked why the bear hadn't been moved farther away. The grizzly was kept within its home range, Ealey added. Dube was the first person killed by a bear in Alberta since 1998.

The grizzly that killed Dube. (photo: Craig Douce, Rocky Mountain Outlook)



As Bonko points out the problem is colonialist expansion in the Rockies;
"Bonko is concerned that the incursion of industrial development into natural habitat areas is driving grizzlies from their natural homes into human-populated areas, increasing the possibility of incidents between humans and grizzlies.

“It’s this government’s policies that have allowed for large-scale industrial development into these natural areas,” said Bonko. “The government now needs to take the responsible, proactive approach and set some guidelines to ensure our natural areas and our wildlife are not endangered by unsustainable human activity.”

A recent study conducted by a wildlife biologist at the U of A in the Bow Valley area indicates wildlife corridors constructed to reduce the impact of development on grizzlies have failed to control human-grizzly contact.

Bonko said the government needs to come up with a better solution for reducing the possibility of human-grizzly contact in places like Canmore, where unrestrained development has led to increased contact between humans and grizzlies.

“The government continues to favour industrial development over the protection of wildlife habitat,” said Bonko. “Unrestrained development with little to no protection for wildlife species will inevitably lead to the extinction of our threatened species.”

Grizzly's aren't as cute as cuddly seals, so the Green NGO's won't being using them as the poster child for their activism. Grizzlies can fight back and the Green NGO's like helpless victims for their fund raising campigns. The Save the Grizzly campaigns have been a mere whimper in comparison to the sturm and drang raised over the seal hunt. Lets see 700 bears vs. 300,000 seals which do you think will become extinct first?

Liberal MLA Bonko followed up on my suggestion on how we can challenge the Grizzly hunt;

Liberal SRD Critic Encourages Grizzly Bear Lovers to Get Hunting Licenses

01 March 2005
Edmonton – Alberta Liberal Sustainable Resource Development critic Bill Bonko is urging all Albertans concerned with protecting the grizzly bear population in Alberta to join him in entering the draw to receive a grizzly bear hunting license this Thursday.

Bonko wants thousands of grizzly bear lovers to enter the draw in the hopes that they receive the licenses and quickly destroy them upon receipt. The government has approved the issuing of 73 licenses for this year despite repeated warnings from their own scientists, as well as conservation groups, warning the government the grizzly bear population in Alberta should not be subject to another hunt.

”If every Albertan who expressed an interest in saving the grizzly bear population entered the draw for a license, the chances of an actual bear hunter receiving one would be greatly diminished,” said Bonko. “If the government refuses to save the grizzly bear population in this province, then this is what we need to do.”

Bonko has made repeated calls for the government to immediately suspend the grizzly bear hunt and implement a recovery strategy to ensure that the number of grizzly bears reaches an acceptable level.

It costs $3.25 to enter the draw for the license and $48.50 to receive the license if selected. Bonko thinks that is a small price to pay to help protect the grizzly bear population in Alberta. ”To mark the price of a grizzly bear’s life at $50 is nominal,” said Bonko. “It is a small price to pay to keep a priceless member of Alberta’s wildlife alive.”

The deadline to enter the grizzly bear license draw is at the end of business hours on Thursday, March 3. You can enter the draw at specified sporting goods and registrations outlets.

Fifty Bucks to kill a Grizzly, Fifty Bucks, is that all? That's disgraceful when you consider what outfitters charge to profit off the kill. $50 and you can help save the Grizzly. Get a license and don't use it. And while you are at it donate another $50 to Save the Grizzly Campaign.

And the reasons the government gives for allowing the hunting of an endangered species?

David Coutts’ Top 8 reasons to continue the grizzly hunt

5. Hunting harvest provides information about bears (e.g., data on distribution and age).

6. Hunting maintains a knowledgeable group of people who are strong advocates for Alberta's grizzly population.

7. Hunters, through licence fees, contribute financially to conservation and management of grizzlies.

8. There is a long-standing hunting tradition and a high demand.

Oh right kill the bears and be advocates for them thats rich, provide information on them, how about just tagging them, your $5o contributes to conservation...right....and finally there is a hunting tradition, really I thought Alberta was all about farming and resource extraction, and high demand, yeah from whom?

Spring grizzly hunt claims 10 bears in Alberta -- six more than last year

Ten grizzly bears were shot and killed during Alberta's controversial spring hunt, according to new statistics. Of the 10 bears killed in the April 1 to May 31 hunt, six were males and four were females. That compares to six grizzlies killed in the 2004 spring hunt and 18 the year before. "It's not as bad as some previous years, but it's still 10 bears out of a pretty small population, so that's a big concern," said Nigel Douglas, conservation specialist with the Alberta Wilderness Association. There are about 700 grizzly bears in Alberta. Officials with the Alberta Fish and Game Association say that this spring's harvest shows hunters are not having a major impact on the population.

Aha, the Grizzly hunt is supported by the AFGA, which posts a picture of a big horn sheep and a bear on the front page of their website. Not deer, or other wild animal that can be used for food, but sport hunting/trophy hunting animals, a big horn and a bear. They claim of course that the bears like other wildlife are a 'natural resource', a commodity by any other name. And that their hunting is a cull that helps stabilize the Grizzly population.

14,000 hunters and fishermen can't be wrong, right? After all they are only 0.01% of the provincial population. That's hardly heavy demand.Especially since not all of them hunt, or hunt Grizzly. We wouldn't want to spoil their fun hunting for sport not food. Which is what bear hunting is. Hmmm I wonder if we culled the hunters what they would say about it being an effective way of conserving their population.

AFGA also promotes the hunting of other endangered species such as black bears, foxes and wolves. In Alberta you don't need to be a trained to hunt.

Not all first time hunters are required to successfully complete a Hunter Education Course in order to be eligible to hold a recreational hunting licence in Alberta. A person may be eligible because they have held a licence authorizing recreational hunting in Alberta or elsewhere, or may have passed the first time hunter test, or may be a non-resident (Canadian) or non-resident alien who is exempt from these requirements if they are hunting with a licenced guide or hunter host.
Government response to AGFA resolution on hunter eductation.

Hansard March 3, 2005

Grizzly Bear Hunt

Mr. Bonko: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Today marks the deadline for applications to be included in the random draw for the spring grizzly bear hunt to commence this April. This hunt is being continued despite the warnings of the government’s own grizzly bear recovery team as well as the warnings of conservation groups which call for the spring bear hunt to be postponed due to the low numbers of grizzly bears in Alberta. To the Minister of Sustainable Resource Development: why is this government refusing to listen to the findings of their own experts and allowing the grizzly bear hunt to continue?

Cause it's a one party state and they can do what they want to, do what they want to they want to. Why the Alberta government won’t protect its grizzly bears

Two Tier Alberta

'Alberta sets the agenda for Canada' Jean Charest 1996

No truer words were ever spoken about the Klein Revolution, and they come back to haunt us again and again as Canadians and as long suffering Albertans.

Little Jean said that when has leader of the Federal Conservatives. As Leader of the Quebec Liberal Party and now that Provinces Premier, he tried to implement his own version of the Klein Revolution in that province over the past two years. Unsuccesfully of course, since Quebec is a social democratic society, and Republican Lite policies while appealing to the mythical ' taxpayers', fall flat when it comes to privatization and outsourcing of the public sector and its unions. Cause those same taxpayers are the workers who are unionized and who use public services.

Part 1: Third Way for Health Care

“I don't think it's two tier,” Mr. Klein said. “I guess it's subjective.”

Today Ralph announced his plans for introducing two tiered health care in Alberta. And it will have a major impact on Health Care across Canada.

Klein launches 'third way' for health care
Alberta Premier Ralph Klein has unveiled changes to the province's health-care system, his long-awaited "third way" mix of public and private options. At a news conference with provincial Health Minister Iris Evans on Tuesday morning, Klein released a plan to transform the system. They fended off questions about whether it would contravene the Canada Health Act or create a two-tier system. "The things that are medically necessary will be provided," Evans said. Klein repeatedly said that he couldn't answer those questions because the province is just starting to form the new strategy. "You don't snap your fingers and it doesn't happen overnight," he said.

Oh that Ralph he is so coy, overnight indeed, he has been planning this for six years since the passing of Bill 11.

Among the changes cited in a 12-point plan released on Tuesday, Alberta plans to:
* Change regulations to provide choice in hospital rooms and enhanced medical goods and services.
* Develop a Health Care Assurance Act for Albertans.
* Expand primary health-care services.
* Control spiraling drug costs.
* Increase the number of health-care providers.
* Improve health services in rural communities.

Alberta's Third Way
By SCOTT DEVEAU
Tuesday, July 12,
Globe and Mail Update
The Alberta government announced its Third Way to provide health care in the province at a press conference in Calgary Tuesday.“The action will start immediately,” Alberta Premier Ralph Klein said Tuesday.
Among the reforms, Mr. Klein announced that Albertans would be able to use secondary insurance to help pay for podiatry and chiropractic services beyond what's covered by Alberta health care by the end of this month.
By September, the province hopes to allow patients in hospitals to choose special accommodations above the standard hospital room and to choose enhanced medical goods and services beyond what doctors decide is medically necessary. Regional health authorities will be able to charge for those special accommodations, Mr. Klein said.

A standing room-only crowd greets the premier. He tells the assembled he only has a few minutes because he has to meet some young farmers.

Do his government's proposals break the Canada Health Act? "No," replies Ralph, who does not elaborate.

What happened to all that stuff about taking on the feds? "We're just starting. You don't just snap your fingers and it doesn't happen overnight."

Where is this Third Way headed? Can you expand?

"I can't expand on it because I don't know. Something may or may not challenge the Canada Health Act."

What we do know is, among the ponderings and promises, people with money will be able to spend their scratch to get nicer hospital rooms and use insurance for services beyond what's covered now and walk on a fancy-pants Birmingham replacement hip rather than the regular-people Premier's Choice replacement hip.

Next year, what's covered by the public plan and what's not will be up for discussion. But Ralph will be gone or very near the exit sign. For now, we see these extras for the affluent, yet another spin on Ralph's Alberta Advantage. By RICK BELL -- Calgary Sun

Well the Supreme Court opened the can of worms with its ruling on provinces responsibility to provide health care for its citizens even if that meant private health care plans. Top court strikes down Quebec private health-care ban

And now Ralph has announced, wait for it, that he intends to apply this in Alberta as part of his Third Way for Healthcare. That is instead of using the American model of privatization he will use the European/British model of two tiered health care. That model of economic efficiency that almost destroyed the British NHS.

Ever since Bill 11 was passed in Alberta, and the weak kneed Feds failed to challenge Ralph over it, his agenda has been to allow for privatization of health care by hook or by crook. And so far many crooked backdoor privatization schemes have occured, mainly in Calgary. All of them associated with members of his party and government.

While Quebec stalls on what the meaning of the Supreme Court ruling means to their highly privatized healthcare system, Montreal has become the private health-care capital of Canada, Ralph has picked up the ball the Fed's fumbled and has declared war on Canada's Public Health Care system.

It's the showdown that has been waiting for five years, and with a Minority Liberal Government facing a BQ and Conservative opposition that will defend Ralph for their own reasons, (the BQ because it will defend Provincial Autonomy and the Conservatives, well they are from Alberta and are the party of privatization) don't expect much but the gnashing and grinding of teeth from Health Minister Dosanjh.

"In Ottawa, Federal Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh pledged to enforce the Canada Health Act. He said Ottawa is in talks with "Alberta, B.C., Quebec and other provinces where there may be violations on diagnostic or surgical aspects of health care." Describing the health act as the "charter of medicare," Dosanjh said the legislation is a "very important instrument in maintaining our system of health care across the country and it will be enforced." Dosanjh said Health Canada is investigating alleged violations, but was not more specific." Clinics' spread vexes ministers

The Feds may have little stomach for a fight with Ralph as our toothless Health Minister confirmed;

In Ottawa, federal Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh said his initial reaction was positive. "No user fees and no queue-jumping are the linchpins of our medicare system," Dosanjh said."These fundamental characteristics of our system will continue to be protected for all Canadians. "I am pleased to see Alberta has reaffirmed its commitment to the Canada Health Act, and that the proposed package, in my view, indicates a generally positive step in ensuring better health care for Albertans."
Klein: let patients buy better service

The media made a big deal with selective quoting of the former NDP Premier of Saskatchewan; Roy Romanow, who did the Romanow Report on Medicare, claiming he was not opposed to Ralph's plan.

Roy Romanow, the former Saskatchewan premier who headed the 2002 royal commission on health care, said the reforms appeared "pretty mild" and most would likely not breach the federal universality provisions.
Klein: let patients buy better service

What he actually said was that Ralphs plan still leads to two tiered care:

But former federal health commissioner Roy Romanow, who led a federal commission on the health care system, says while he has no problem with the proposal on hospital rooms, putting a price tag on joint replacements amounts to two-tiered care. He also attacked the notion that adding more private health care to the system would reduce the load on the public system. "Take a look at the United Kingdom, take a look at France, take a look at any of those countries that have attempted this and what happens is, the wait times increase both in the public sector and in the private sector." CBC Saskatchewan

Canadians who support public services and public delivery of those services, view it as money well spent. Those on the right view it as limiting their friends from making a profit off of us. Be afraid Canada, be very afraid, Ralph and his federal counterparts in Harpers Conservatives will be out to convince you that two tiered health care is the best reform for medical services delivery.

The Alberta Federation of Labour pointedly stated that; More private health insurance will increase business costs and undermine "Alberta Advantage" Corporate Alberta should take tories out to the woodshed. I like that last bit but unfortunately Corporate Alberta likes two tiered medicare, after all THEY CAN AFFORD IT.

Other critics have panned the plan that's not a plan.

"This isn't a plan, it's a grab bag of ideas big and small, new and old. It appears to reflect the split in the government caucus between those, including Premier Klein, who want more privatization, and those who champion public health care, as does Health Minister Iris Evans." Edmonton Journal Editorial.

"The rich in this province will get the Birmingham hip and the rest of us will get the tragically hip," Alberta NDP Leader Brian Mason said of specialized hip surgery which has fewer complications and works better in younger, active patients than traditional hip replacements. The bone-conserving procedure can be three times more expensive than a traditional hip replacement and is only available in Calgary as part of a pilot project.
Klein: let patients buy better service

I like that sound bite Brian. And folks please note where is this hip replacement procedure only available? Like I have said before there is Alberta, and then there is Calgary, and the Klein agenda is set in Calgary by the PC's (Party of Calgary).

The health care “reforms” announced by the Alberta government yesterday take the province further down the dangerous path to a full two-tier health care system, says AUPE President Dan MacLennan. “Albertans should be gravely concerned about the idea of allowing the wealthy to pay extra for ‘enhanced’ health care services,” MacLennan said. “There is a great risk that it will not be long before what we now think of as a basic medical necessity will be described as ‘enhanced.’Allowing physicians to offer Cadillac services to well-heeled patients will over the long term drive many medical professionals out of the public health system to run purely for-profit medical businesses, he warned. “The danger is that waiting lists for basic public health services will grow longer and that the quality of service in the public health system will get worse."
Alberta health care ‘reforms’ increase risk of creating two-tier health system

"Third Way" is the Evolution of Private Health Care

CUPE Alberta President decries sneaking in two-tier system by stealth

Government’s plan more of the same private health agenda

Albertans have long rejected two-tier care for the privileged.
Says the UNA press release

"Alberta's Liberal opposition immediately criticized the proposals and called on the federal government to penalize Alberta. "There's no question we're headed towards a two-tiered health-care system," said Liberal Leader Kevin Taft. "That just goes against everything that we stand for in Alberta." Government’s “Third Way” Fails to Address Real Health Care Issues, Taft.

The Friends of Medicare, a lobby group fighting privatization of health care, said the new system could allow doctors to line their pockets by pressuring patients."Allowing doctors to charge an extra fee to provide an enhanced system -- a hip or surgery or service -- will create pressure for doctors to oversell to patients," said spokesman Harvey Voogd."It will create a conflict of interest for the patient-doctor relationship."

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation applauded the move, though, saying patients "should have the right to spend their own money on health-care services for themselves and their loved ones." Alberta: better health care for wealthy

Oh there's those taxpayers again, they are a business lobby and of course they think this is great. Right up there with tax breaks. They like the idea that those that can afford to pay for private services should be able to. But boy they hate the idea of making the rich pay for public health care for everyone.

It's an old story, as old as Medicare itself, when Tommy Douglas introduced single payer health care in Saskatchewan and Alberta offered the 'choice' of multiple payer plans. What goes around comes around.

And if that isn't scary enough for those of you on summer vacation how about two tier daycare. Scrap the National Daycare plan the Liberals tried to introduce, Alberta has swung it's own deal for public funding of private service delivery.

Part 2: Daycare

In Alberta the Ralph Regime rolls on, taxing federal tax money to fund private for profit daycare and babysitting services. The impact of the Federal Government funding two tier daycare in Alberta cannot be underestimated for the rest of Canada. CUPE has figured it out, Alberta deal opens the door to big box child care

Be afraid Canada be very afraid, cause what happens here will impact on you too. Conservative provincial governments will adopt the Klein agenda with a me too attitude. Heck even Liberal Provincial governments like those in B.C. and Quebec will follow the Klein lead.

The Liberals began pursuing provincial side-deals after Dryden failed to get all 10 provinces and three territories to sign one deal for national standards.Quebec and Alberta have balked at the plan, saying they don't want Ottawa to dictate to them how to spend the money. CTV News

The Alberta NDP plead;Allow parents to choose high quality, low-cost, non-profit child care - Martin So what happens to all that provincial tax money that funded daycare, will it be used to supplement the federal windfall, I doubt it. More than likely it will be adjusted in the provincial budget and disappear into the general revenues.

And the federal money? Will it be used to fund early education programs? Nah, more than likely it will fund training programs for Baba and Dido to learn how to babysit, as New Brunswick Conservative Preimier Bernard Lord has proposed. Premier advances N.B. position on federal child-care funding With tax credits for the rest of us, which will hardly pay for a years worth of groceries let alone the cost of daycare services.

This is the free choice model of the federal Conservatives for daycare, give parents choice, which just means giving taxpayers back their money, while leaving public day care to dangle by the rope of underfunding.

G8 Summit on Africa Is Chretien's Legacy

It's not often many Canadians have anything nice to say about the Liberals or the regime of Chretien and Martin, but all Canadians should be proud of their efforts which bore fruit last week in Scotland at the G8.

In all the backslapping last week at the G8 whether it was Bono and Geldolf or Blair and Bush, they forgot the agenda on Africa was set three years ago in Kananaskis by Canadian PM Jean Chretien.

He reduced the usual three day love fest to thirty hours with a single focus; Africa. G8 summit takes to its roots This was the Canadian commitment to Africa. To kick the butts of the other G8 leaders to get down to business or as Chretien said at the time, in his own inimical way;

"We will walk the talk of the Africa Action Plan," adding, "There will be some people who will say it's not enough. But it's a departure - you could see the reaction of the African leaders. They were excited."

The leaders promised to reduce by $19 billion US the debt of 22 African countries that follow "sound economic policies and good governance." On top of other debt relief, that represents a reduction of $30 billion US for Africa, or two-thirds of the continent's debt. Chretien, in his closing news conference, said Canada will spend $6 billion over five years "to allow Africa to find its way out of poverty. The plan is in response to a document drafted by African leaders - called the New Partnership for Africa's Development, or NEPAD - that is meant to address cynicism from donor countries that aid to Africa is too-often lost in a sinkhole of Swiss bank accounts and questionable projects. "G-8 leaders commit to landmark plan to help break Africa's cycle of poverty

This was followed up the next year with a G8 meeting with African leaders,
NOTES FOR REMARKS BY PRIME MINISTER JEAN CHRÉTIEN WELCOMING PARTICIPANTS OF G8 NEPAD ROUNTABLE

So while the media and the pundints applauded Tony Blair for inviting African leaders to the Scotland G8 meeting last week, Chretien had already done so back in 2002, with a follow up meeting in 2003. Canada set the agenda for this round of talks, Blair was basking in the glow of Chretiens efforts.

CHRéTIEN, BLAIR STRUGGLE TO MAKE G-8 SUMMIT MEANINGFUL FOR AFRICA

In fact all Tony had going for him was he was hosting PM and had gotten a commitment from his old friend George Bush II to throw a little more money inthe pot, a pot already set up by Chretien three years ago.Chretien Presses Bush on Aid to Africa

Bono who recently said he wanted to kick Paul Martins butt seems to foget the praise he heaped on both Martin and Chretien at the Leadership Convention in 2003 that saw Martin take over from Chretien. "Bono applauded Chretien's efforts in a recent letter, saying "From the perspective of a pesky Irish rockster, your leadership in Africa will be a legacy that lives on and flourishes way beyond your time in office."

Martin in his quest to match Chretiens generosity declared that Canada would be the first country to fund production of generic Aids drugs for Africa, something the US and its pharmaceutical company lobbies have opposed.

"The appearance of U2's Bono at the Liberal leadership convention has not only drawn attention to what has become more of a celebration than a race, it shows where new Liberal leader Paul Martin is focused, according to UN AIDS envoy Stephen Lewis. Lewis said he believes that having Bono at the convention signals Martin's commitment to a Canadian initiative to get generic AIDS drugs to Africa as well as an increase in foreign aid -- two projects he said Martin could pursue more vigorously than his predecessor. "I think Paul Martin is completely committed to generic drugs legislation," Lewis told CTV.ca News. "And I think that by having Bono at the Liberal convention, Paul Martin is giving the signal that we're likely to be contributing more to the resources of the Global (AIDS) Fund." Bono and Martin join forces on aid to Africa

How quickly they forget. Geldof and Bono, have put pressure on the G8 leaders to live up to their commitments, and while Canada has not fully made a commitment to .07 funding by 2015,(again a target originally made by another Liberal PM, Lester B. Pearson) the efforts of Canada to make Africa the issue at the G8 to come up with a generic AIDS plan, and to look at breaking down trade barriers, is more than done by any other country to date, including by Tony come lately.

If Martin was realistic, heck even pragmatic, in telling Bono and Geldof that Canada would not make a commitment, regardless of the surplus, to .07% now, it's because he put on the mantel of Fianance Minister. And he told Bono and Geldof, Canada will contribute what it actually can, which was increased with the passing of the Better Balanced Budget of the NDP. Not what we might need for PR purposes, and summit photo ops, but what we realistically can. On top of the commitments we have already made over the last three years.

This then is the legacy of the Chretien Government, that Africa would become a focus of the G8 and of the world three years after Chretien made it His issue.

Something that we can all be proud of, and in our usual Canadian way, sit back and say others can take credit for what was another Canadian first.

While the Liberals and Chretien are tainted with Adscam, the real legacy of the last decade of the Chretien regime will be the success or failure of the world to deal with the crisis in Africa.

But Chretien will at least be able to take credit for making the industrial countries of the G8 take the plight of Africa seriously. Without his efforts Blair, Bono and Geldoff would not have been able to make it the issue of this G8 meeting.

Damn I almost feel like I have been possesed by the spirit of Warren Kinsella. But hey credit where credit is due, and Canada and Chretien did not get enough credit this week for what happened at the G8 meeting in Scotland.

But what else is new, eh?