Saturday, November 14, 2020

TIKTOK
Trump Still Wants To Get Rid of TikTok
Remember this whole thing?



BY JORDAN HOFFMAN NOVEMBER 14, 2020

BY NURPHOTO/GETTYIMAGES

You may recall this summer that, in addition to toilets that didn't flush to his specifications, President Donald Trump went to war with TikTok.

Some theorized that it was because K-Pop fans using the app made him look like a dunce at a June rally in Tulsa, but Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed it was because the video sharing app's parent company, ByteDance, could do nefarious things with user data on behalf of the Chinese government. (He referred to the service that delights millions with videos of cranberry juice-drinking Fleetwood Mac fans as "a Trojan horse for Chinese intelligence.") As such, the administration threatened to ban TikTok entirely.

A deal, or at least the concept of a deal, was accepted by the Trump Administration wherein the Chinese company ByteDance would sell its core asset for the American market to an American company. (TikTok itself was already based in Los Angeles, and with a former Disney exec at the helm who defined his shop as "not really a Chinese company," but this didn't cut it.) While some companies like Microsoft, then a tandem of Oracle and Walmart, were eager work out an agreement, there was hesitation on behalf of the Chinese government. Then the pressure petered out, and there was that whole election thing. Trump's deadline of November 12 still loomed, however, so, last week, TikTok finally tapped the mic to ask, "hey, do you still want us to do this?"

The Trump Administration, in typical form, responded not with a yes or a no, but with yet a further delay. As such, the new deadline is November 27.

What does this mean for users of the popular app, whose downloads, naturally, went through the roof when Trump began his threats? That remains unknown for now, but we can surely expect some cutting videos about it if the government actually interferes.


WHEN IN DOUBT RED SCARE!


 TikTok a national security threat?

60 Minutes reports on the popular Chinese-owned app that a senator says has ties to the Chinese Communist Party. See the story, Sunday

TikTok calls itself "the last sunny corner on the Internet." But dark forebodings about the company's ties to the Chinese government have clouded the popular app's reputation and future in the U.S. where 100 million Americans have already downloaded it and President Trump wants to ban it. TikTok was granted a temporary reprieve on Thursday when the U.S. Commerce Department announced it would not enforce its order that would have shut down the app because of pending litigation. Bill Whitaker speaks to intelligence and cybersecurity sources who warn the entertaining app collects a treasure trove of data the Chinese government could someday use against the U.S. Whitaker's report will be broadcast on the next edition of 60 Minutes Sunday night after NFL coverage on CBS.   

Each day, 50 million Americans, mostly teenagers, spend almost an hour watching short videos on TikTok, while data, like their name, location, personal network, online viewing habits and even keystroke patterns are collected. There's nothing unusual about a mobile app accessing such information; Instagram, Twitter and Snapchat also collect users' data. But TikTok is different, says Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri). "Here's the problem with TikTok…It is owned by a Chinese parent company that has direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party," Hawley says. "And we also know that under Chinese law, TikTok – Bytedance, the parent – is required to share data with the Chinese Communist Party… That's in the law. American users, parents, teenagers, they have no way of knowing about any of this," Hawley tells Whitaker.   

China has a history of spying on the U.S. and has been caught stealing technology. It has also been accused of acquiring personal information of hundreds of millions of ordinary citizens. For example, in February the Department of Justice identified the Chinese military unit and personnel involved in hacking into the credit reporting agency Equifax and taking personal information affecting more than 140 million Americans. Other high-profile hacks in the U.S. attributed to China have targeted government security clearance files, Americans' personal data collected by a major health insurer, and even hotel stays. Many wonder what the Chinese military could do with information collected by a mobile app like TikTok. "Build dossiers, build files on every American who they can get their hands on," for one thing says Hawley.  "We could ask the same question about the Equifax breach. Why would the Chinese government be interested in the financial history of hundreds of millions of Americans? What are they going do with that? Well, clearly they thought it was very, very useful to them. Who knows, it may have military applications in the future," says the senator.  

Those concerns, combined with the tensions with China this summer, led to President Trump's call for a ban of the mobile app unless it was separated from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, a $140 billion social media and artificial intelligence company based in Beijing. A compromise, currently on hold, was hammered out in which ByteDane would sell 20% of TikTok to the U.S. software and cloud computing company Oracle and Walmart. But Hawley says that won't change anything unless the app's recommendation algorithm is redesigned and severed from engineers working in China. "Because right now, it's been built by Chinese engineers. They have control and access to how the platform works," Hawley contends.  

Hawley, a former attorney general of Missouri, has been aggressive in pursuing the excesses of American big tech companies, and is even more concerned about TikTok and U.S. companies with strong connections to China. He chaired a Senate subcommittee hearing on the subject last March, but TikTok and Apple refused to testify. "Executives from TikTok, they will never come and take the oath and testify in public. That I think is unusual," Hawley says. "And I think it begs the question: 'What do they have to hide?'"  

TikTok has nothing to hide according to its interim-CEO Vanessa Pappas. "TikTok does not operate in China. The U.S. data is stored here in the U.S. with backup in Singapore, and we have strict data access controls," she says. "If a government were to request data we will put that in our transparency report and tell you. And certainly the Chinese government has not requested data, and if they did it would be an emphatic, 'no.'"   

Former intelligence officers like the Heritage Foundation's Director of Technology Policy Klon Kitchen tell Whitaker that TikTok would never know if the data it collects was being accessed. Its corporate parent ByteDance, like other Chinese tech companies, must provide the Chinese Communist Party access to all its data by law.  "The national security and cyber security laws of China require [companies] to operate and build their networks in such a fashion as to where the government has unfettered access to their data," says the former intelligence officer. "So no, the CCP doesn't ask them for information. They don't need to. They have access to the information."   

ByteDance gets extension on Trump’s TikTok divestiture order

Under pressure from the Trump administration, ByteDance has been in talks with Walmart and Oracle to shift TikTok’s US assets.

ByteDance filed a petition with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the Trump administration's divestiture order [File: Dado Ruvic/Reuters]

13 Nov 2020

The administration of United States President Donald Trump granted ByteDance a 15-day extension of a divestiture order that had directed the Chinese company to sell its TikTok short video-sharing app by Thursday.

TikTok first disclosed the extension earlier in a court filing, saying it now has until November 27 to reach an agreement. Under pressure from the US government, ByteDance has been in talks for a deal with Walmart Inc and Oracle Corp to shift TikTok’s US assets into a new entity.

The Treasury Department said on Friday the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) granted the 15-day extension to “provide the parties and the committee additional time to resolve this case in a manner that complies with the Order.”

ByteDance filed a petition on Tuesday with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging the Trump administration divestiture order.

ByteDance said on Tuesday CFIUS sought “to compel the wholesale divestment of TikTok, a multibillion-dollar business built on technology developed by” ByteDance and based on the government’s review of the Chinese company’s 2017 acquisition of Musical.ly.

President Donald Trump, in an August 14 order, had directed ByteDance to divest the app within 90 days.


The Trump administration contended TikTok posed national security concerns, saying the personal data of US users could be obtained by China’s government. TikTok, which has more than 100 million US users, has denied the allegations.

Trump has said the Walmart-Oracle deal had his “blessing”.

One big issue that has persisted is about the ownership structure of the new company, TikTok Global, which would own TikTok’s US assets.

In Tuesday’s court filing, ByteDance said it submitted a fourth proposal last Friday that contemplated addressing US concerns “by creating a new entity, wholly owned by Oracle, Walmart and existing US investors in ByteDance, that would be responsible for handling TikTok’s US user data and content moderation”.

Separate restrictions on TikTok from the US Commerce Department have been blocked by federal courts, including transaction curbs that were scheduled to take effect on Thursday, which TikTok warned could effectively ban the app’s use in the US.

A Commerce Department ban on Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc’s Google offering TikTok for download for new US users that had been set to take effect on September 27 has also been blocked.

SOURCE : REUTERS


100 YEARS WAR
Armenian Villagers are Burning Down Their Homes Before Disputed Territory is Handed to Azerbaijan

Smoke rises from a burning house in an area once occupied by Armenian forces but soon to be turned over to Azerbaijan, in Karvachar, the separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh, on November 13, 2020. (AP Photo/Dmitry Lovetsky)

Armenia on Saturday said that 2,317 of it fighters were killed in the clashes, an increase of nearly 1,000 deaths compared to the last confirmed death toll among Armenian fighters.
AFP

CHAREKTAR
LAST UPDATED:NOVEMBER 14, 2020

Villagers outside of Nagorno-Karabakh set their houses on fire Saturday before fleeing to Armenia ahead of a weekend deadline that will see disputed territory handed over to Azerbaijan as part of a peace agreement.

Residents of the Kalbajar district in Azerbaijan that was controlled by Armenian separatists for decades began a mass exodus this week after it was announced Azerbaijan would regain control on Sunday.


Fighting between the separatists backed by Armenian troops and the Azerbaijan army erupted over the Nagorno-Karabakh breakaway region in late September and raged for six weeks.

Armenia on Saturday said that 2,317 of it fighters were killed in the clashes, an increase of nearly 1,000 deaths compared to the last confirmed death toll among Armenian fighters.

Azerbaijan has not revealed its military casualties and the real toll after weeks of fighting is expected to be much higher.

Russian President Vladimir Putin this week said the number of fatalities was higher than 4,000 and that tens of thousands of people had been forced to flee their homes.

In the village of Charektar, on the border with the neighbouring district of Martakert which is to remain under Armenian control, at least six houses were on fire Saturday morning with thick plumes of smoke rising over the valley, an AFP journalist saw.

"This is my house, I can't leave it to the Turks," as Azerbaijanis are often called by Armenians, said one resident as he threw burning wooden planks and rags soaked in gasoline into a completely empty house.

"Everybody is going to burn down their house today... We were given until midnight to leave," he said. "We also moved our parents' graves, the Azerbaijanis will take great pleasure in desecrating our graves. It's unbearable," he added.



RUSSIAN PEACEKEEPERS

On Friday at least 10 houses were burned in and around Charektar. The ex-Soviet rivals agreed to end hostilities earlier this week after previous efforts by Russia, France and the United States to get a ceasefire fell through.A key part of the peace deal includes Armenia's return of Kalbajar, as well as the Aghdam district by November 20 and the Lachin district by December 1, which have been held by Armenians since a devastating war in the 1990s.

The two sides will maintain positions in the territories they currently hold, a significant gain for Azerbaijan after it reclaimed some 15 to 20 percent of lost territory including the key town of Shusha.

Russian peacekeepers began deploying to Nagorno-Karabakh on Wednesday as part of the terms of the accord and took control of a key transport artery connecting Armenia to the disputed province.

Russian military officials said the mission consisting of nearly 2,000 troops would put in place 16 observation posts in mountainous Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachin corridor.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on Wednesday accused Armenians of destroying "99 percent of the liberated territory" including hospitals, houses and monuments, adding that he wanted Armenia to pay compensation.

Meanwhile in Armenia, anger was mounting over Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan's decision to cede swathes of disputed territory.

Thousands of people converged on the streets of Yerevan in demonstrations this week, while protesters stormed and ransacked government buildings, demanding Pashinyan's resignation.
‘I...I Am The Mainstream Media,’ Realizes Horrified Tucker Carlson Spiraling Live On Air


Wednesday 3:30PM
•https://www.theonion.com/i-i-am-the-mainstream-media-realizes-horrified-tuc-1845646901


WASHINGTON—Coming to the realization in front of millions of viewers during the broadcast of his show, a horrified Tucker Carlson stated, ‘I…I am the mainstream media’ Wednesday as he began spiraling live on air. “We’ve discovered evidence of rampant voter fraud, and the president has every right to call for an investigation even if the mainstream media thinks...” said Carlson, who trailed off, stared down at his shaking hands, and felt a sudden ringing in his ears as he looked back up and zeroed in on the production crew surrounding him. “The media says…wait. Those liars on TV will try to tell you…oh God. We’re the number-one program on cable news, aren’t we? Fox News…Fox ‘News.’ It’s the media. It’s me. This can’t be. No, no, no, no. Jesus Christ, I make $6 million a year. Get that camera off me!”
At press time, Carlson had torn the microphone from his lapel and fled the set in panic 

ONE OF THESE IS FAKE NEWS 
AND IT AIN'T THE ONION
THAT'S SATIRE

 Victor Davis Hanson to Tucker: Elites Have Turned Election Day Into an 'Entitlement'(SIC)

BLOG By Alexander Watson | November 11, 2020

Victor Davis Hanson speaks with Tucker Carlson on "Tucker Carlson Tonight." 
(Photo credit: YouTube/no one)

Hoover Institution fellow Victor Davis Hanson said that "Big Data, Big Tech, Big Pollster" and more have colluded to turn Election Day into an "entitlement" while on Monday's "Tucker Carlson Tonight." 

“I think it's a transition from a rugged individual who has to take a responsibility to know the issues, show up on Election Day, unless he's working or she’s sick, and then turning it into sort of an entitlement," Hanson told Carlson.

THE RIGHT WING PAVLOVIAN TROPE: ENTITLEMENT

"You just lay back, and whenever you contact a government agent, they’re going to send you a registration form, and somebody is even going to harvest that and knock on the door and fill it out, and the polls are going to tell you who you should vote for because they're scientific, and they have the authority of Twitter or Facebook or social media that you use," he said. "What we did was we took the prime element of citizenship, which is voting on Election Day, that has to be approved and have some authority and sanctity, and we destroyed it."



A full transcript of the quoted section of the show follows: 

Carlson: Victor Davis Hanson is one of the wisest people we ever speak to; he's a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and he joins us tonight. Professor, thanks so much for coming on. Where do you think we are right now? What’s happening? 

Hanson: Well, I think you outlined sort of a tragic, last Orwellian convergence of Big Data, Big Tech, Big Pollster, Big Money, administrative state and what they did, Tucker, is they rendered the most hallowed date in American traditions, the first Tuesday in November, into an abstraction. It’s a construct. Even the word "absentee ballot" doesn't mean anything anymore. It's ceased to exist and what did they replace it with? This new concept of early voting and mail-in balloting. We never heard those words before and what they mean is 30, 40, 45 days before the election, you can keep voting casually, you can go in, vote, maybe not, any day, there's no one day you vote. Ballots can come in one, two, three, four days after the polls maybe. And if the rules are too oppressive, you can sue and overturn the constitutional right of the legislators who set the voting laws. And what do we miss? It used to be the last two or three weeks were the heated time of the campaign. That's when you showed the mettle of the candidate. So what did it matter if Donald Trump had a really good second debate? What did it matter if we heard about Hunter Biden when millions of people had already voted? And what did they vote on? What were the perceptions? As you said, they were massaged by polls. So they were being, their knowledge came, well, you know Wisconsin 17 down and 12 down in the national polls, and Trump’s favorability is 18 down, so, it really wouldn't be wise to give money or to vote; it's over with.

Carlson: Exactly.

Hanson: And so we really abrogated, took away that responsibility of the citizen and we outsourced it. And that wasn’t enough because we took the personal element out of it. We used to go to the polls and somebody would say "Mrs. Smith," "Mr. Jones, you didn’t sign. Your date, you got a day, remember that. Here is your address." And we just turn it over to this pseudo-scientific group of people that said, “we have computers, we’re exact. We can poll to the exact decimal point. And we dumped all these votes into these anonymous centers where there was no human contact, no transparency, no audit, and we expect them not to have 15 percent of the vote under the old absentee system, but 70, 80, 85 percent of the vote. And we expect them to get a result that's going to be accurate, audited, adjudicated. It can’t happen. And then to add insult to injury, on Election Night, we had these same pseudo-scientific experts say, “you know what? Two percent, 10 percent, this state is over with, and this state over here is not over with.” And they have nothing to do with reality but they form a narrative, a theme. So in the case of last Tuesday night, why would, if you were a Trump supporter, why would you object to what you thought was going on in Michigan and Pennsylvania when you were told that Barry Goldwater’s state, the bastion of conservatism, was lost twenty minutes after the polls closed or that Texas and Florida can’t even be called because Trump has been wiped out in his home base? That shapes perceptions even after the polls close.

So the only mystery is, what’s behind all this? And I think it's a transition from a rugged individual who has to take a responsibility to know the issues, show up on Election Day, unless he's working or she’s sick, and then turning it into sort of an entitlement. You just lay back, and whenever you contact a government agent, they’re going to send you a registration form, and somebody is even going to harvest that and knock on the door and fill it out, and the polls are going to tell you who you should vote for because they're scientific, and they have the authority of Twitter or Facebook or social media that you use. And then to add final insult, with all that, and then you’re going to be told you’re a winner or loser based on these perceived polls on Election Night and the analytics. So to finish, Tucker, what we did was we took the prime element of citizenship, which is voting on Election Day, that has to be approved and have some authority and sanctity, and we destroyed it. And without voting, you don’t have citizenship; without citizenship, you don’t have a republic. So that’s what’s at stake. And when people like Gavin Newsom and Hilary Clinton say that this COVID virus and lockdown was an opportunity to transform things, and a crisis never to go to waste, then we think maybe it wasn't accidental. Maybe it wasn’t accidental. Maybe it wasn't just the way things had to be. And that’s really scary. 

Tucker: It is scary. I don’t want to reach that conclusion but you can see how people would. Victor Davis Hanson, it's great to see you tonight. Thank you.

Hanson: Thank you.

Alexander Watson is a CNSNews intern and Christendom College graduate.

CNSNews Reader,

The media are hard at work weaving a web of confusion, misinformation, and conspiracy surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

CNSNews covers the stories that the liberal media are afraid to touch. It drives the national debate through real, honest journalism—not by misrepresenting or ignoring the facts.

CNSNews has emerged as the conservative media’s lynchpin for original reporting, investigative reporting, and breaking news. We are part of the only organization purely dedicated to this critical mission and we need your help to fuel this fight.

Donate today to help CNSNews continue to report on topics that the liberal media refuse to touch. 

And now, thanks to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, you can make up to a $300 gift to the 501(c)(3) non-profit organization of your choice and use it as a tax deduction on your 2020 taxes, even if you take the standard deduction on your returns.

(SIC)

— The CNSNews Team



Tucker Carlson apologized on-air for making a false accusation of voter fraud in Georgia
insider@insider.com (John L. Dorman)
© Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
 Fox News host Tucker Carlson. 

Fox News host Tucker Carlson apologized on Friday after a Georgia news station let him know that he had falsely claimed that a dead man voted illegally in the state.

The voter in question, Agnes Blalock, is the wife of the late James Blalock Jr., and her registered voter name is "Mrs. James Blalock, Jr."

"He's not voting," she told the Atlanta-based news station 11 Alive. "He didn't vote. It was me."

Carlson issued an apology on-air, saying that "we're always going to correct when we're wrong, and we were."

Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Friday apologized on-air after a Georgia news station informed him that he had falsely alleged that a dead man voted illegally in the state during the November election.

During a Thursday segment of "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Carlson said that a ballot had been cast for James Blalock of Covington, a World War II veteran who passed away in 2006. In reality, the ballot was cast by his widow, who is registered to vote under the name "Mrs. James R. Blalock, Jr."

President Donald Trump's campaign, which has issued a litany of lawsuits in a range of swing states to back up debunked claims of voter fraud, inaccurately released Blalock's name as evidence of a dead individual who cast a ballot, which would point to voter fraud.

"No one quite embodies that story like James Blalock of Covington, Georgia. Mr. Blalock was a mailman for 33 years, until he passed away in 2006," Carlson said on Thursday. "Fourteen years later, according to state records, he was still mailing things. James Blalock cast a ballot in last week's election."

Officials in Newton County, outside of Atlanta, released a statement on Thursday saying that the report was incorrect. The record that the Trump campaign touted as evidence of fraud actually revealed that the registered voter was Blalock's widow.

"Her voter registration was signed as Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr. and that is exactly how she signed her name when she voted in the Nov. 3 general election," the officials wrote. "Newton County conducts its elections and voter registration efforts with transparency and attention to detail and hopes that any reporting on this or any other election be done [with] the same level of fact-checking and accurate information."

The local Atlanta NBC affiliate, 11 Alive, pointed out the inaccuracies of Carlson's report after county officials refuted the incidence of voter fraud. The station spoke with Agnes Blalock, a 96-year-old woman, who confirmed that she was indeed the one who voted.

"He's not voting," she said. "He didn't vote. It was me."

On Friday, Carlson issued an apology to viewers for giving them misleading information.

"We've got some good news tonight and an apology," he said. "One of the people who voted in last week's election isn't dead. James Blalock is still dead. We told you about him, but it was his wife who voted. She voted as Mrs. James Blalock. It's old-fashioned, and we missed it ... It was Mrs. James Blalock, so apologies for that, and of course we're always going to correct when we're wrong, and we were."

He also alleged that "a whole bunch of dead people did vote," but noted that "James Blalock was not among them."

A viral claim of thousands of deceased individuals voting in the election has spread across the internet in recent days and was debunked by The New York Times.

"Dead people whose identities were used to vote appear to be a popular subject for those who are spreading unsubstantiated claims of fraud about the election," The Times said.

Decision Desk HQ and Insider declared Joe Biden the winner of the presidential election on November 6 and called Georgia for the president-elect on November 14. 

Trump, who fell far short of the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency, has so far refused to concede, pointing to largely debunked cases of voter fraud in an attempt to delegitimize the election.

Read the original article on 
Business Insider


Amazing what actual investigative journalism can do as opposed to blindly repeating claims invented on the internet.
Quote Tweet
Brendan Keefe
@BrendanKeefe
·
President Trump's campaign accused four Georgia voters of fraud. Said they voted 'dead' in the presidential election. We tracked two of them down, alive & well. We simply knocked on a door and 96-year-old Mrs. James Blalock answered. @11AliveNews 11alive.com/article/news/p
Show this thread
29
85
216
Tucker Carlson issues a correction and gives an apology after falsely claiming that a deceased individual had voted in Georgia. He goes on to assert that he was correct, however, about other dead voters even though the other report he mentioned was debunked as well.
3K views
0:04 / 0:29
109
71
190

Replies