Friday, January 15, 2021


Spokesperson for 

Alphabet Workers Union says company failing to

'act ethically,' 'live up' to expectations




1/14/2021

Alex Gorowara, a software engineer for Google and volunteer spokesperson for the new Alphabet Workers Union, on Thursday, said that the group aims to push Google’s parent company, Alphabet, to adopt more policies concerning growth opportunities and inclusivity in the workplace.

In an interview on Hill.TV’s “Rising,” Gorowara said that the worker’s union, whose membership now numbers at nearly 700, will “instead of demanding collective bargaining based on a particular law,” aim to “get Alphabet’s attention and responsiveness, simply by speaking together, by raising a collective voice.”

“Alphabet and Google have a long history of worker activism, a long history of workers caring about their work environment, caring about how their work is used ethically and fairly, and the union is sort of an extension of that, an extension of people who care about each other and their work,” Gorowara explained.

He argued that in recent years, Alphabet is “failing to live up to our expectations, they are failing to act ethically, failing to act consistently in accord with the principles that we generally all believe in.”

Gorowara added that the “hope” of the minority or non-contract union “is to be able to steer Alphabet to a more ethical course, both to the benefit of its works and for the public in general.”

Watch part of Gorowara’s interview 

Trader Joe's, Instacart join companies paying employees to get COVID-19 vaccine



© Getty

Trader Joe’s and Instacart are the latest businesses to announce that they will be giving their employees extra pay for getting the coronavirus vaccine.

Grocery store Trader Joe’s will give employees two extra hours of pay per dose of the COVID-19 vaccine they need, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. Instacart will give staff a $25 stipend.

Dollar General had announced on Wednesday that they will give their employees four hours extra pay and adjust their schedules as needed. s

Hospitals and nursing homes are also starting to offer their employees money if they get vaccinated against COVID-19. A county-run nursing home in Northampton County, Pa., is offering their employees up to $750 to get vaccinated.

Other companies might be hesitant to offer these incentives so soon because it is not clear when their employees will be eligible for the vaccine.

Millions across the country have already received the vaccine, but the rollout is still going much slower than officials anticipated. Strict guidelines slowing down the process are starting to be lifted in the hopes vaccines will get to more people quicker.

 BEING BI IS NO EXCUSE

Lincoln Project cofounder acknowledges sending 'inappropriate' sexual messages


© Screenshot of an ad from The Lincoln Project.

John Weaver, a co-founder of the anti-Trump Republican political action committee The Lincoln Project, said Friday that he sent "inappropriate" sexually charged messages to multiple men and issued an apology for his behavior.

"To the men I made uncomfortable through my messages that I viewed as consensual mutual conversations at the time: I am truly sorry," Weaver said in a statement to Axios. "They were inappropriate and it was because of my failings that this discomfort was brought on you."

"The truth is that I'm gay," Weaver added in his statement to the outlet. “And that I have a wife and two kids who I love. My inability to reconcile those two truths has led to this agonizing place.”

THIS IS A USUAL EXPLANATION (EXCUSE)  GIVEN WHICH DOES NOT MEAN HE IS GAY HE MAY BE BI

 SEX IS SEX AND LOVE IS LOVE AND SOMETIMES THEY GO TOGETHER IF YOU ARE LUCKY

The statement from Weaver, a longtime GOP operative, came after a number of allegations surfaced this week of men accusing the strategist of sending inappropriate messages.

Multiple men claimed that he had sent them sexually suggestive messages unsolicited, with the messages occasionally including offers of employment or political gain, Axios reported.

Weaver took a leave of absence from The Lincoln Project last summer and told Axios he won't be returning to the PAC

“The project's defense of the Republic and fight for democracy is vital,” he added.

Mediaite reports that the group has taken down its leadership page, which had listed Weaver.

The Lincoln Project did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment.

NRA filing for bankruptcy, moving from New York to Texas



The National Rifle Association (NRA) has filed for bankruptcy and will reincorporate in Texas, the gun rights advocacy group announced Friday.

The NRA, which is based in New York, said it's exiting “what it believes is a corrupt political and regulatory environment in New York” and will restructure as a Texas nonprofit. Its plan, it said, “involves utilizing the protection of the bankruptcy court.”

“The move will enable long-term, sustainable growth and ensure the NRA’s continued success as the nation’s leading advocate for constitutional freedom – free from the toxic political environment of New York,” the NRA said in a statement.

The NRA also claims it is in its “strongest financial condition in years” and said there will be no immediate changes to its operations or workforce. Texas is home to more than 400,000 NRA members and the group is holding its annual meeting in Houston in 2021.

“This strategic plan represents a pathway to opportunity, growth and progress,” NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre said in a statement. “Obviously an important part of this plan is ‘dumping New York.’ The NRA is pursuing reincorporating in a state that values the contributions of the NRA, celebrates our law-abiding members, and will join us as a partner in upholding constitutional freedom. This is a transformational moment in the history of the NRA.”

The news follows a lawsuit from New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) in August that alleges the NRA violated state law governing nonprofit organizations, contributing to a loss of more $64 million over three years.

The civil suit also claimed that the group and four of its top officials, including LaPierre, diverted millions of dollars away from its charitable mission.

Learn how to manage your finances and get a jumpstart on filing your...
Texas is first state to administer 1 million coronavirus vaccine...

James in a statement on Friday called the NRA both morally and financially bankrupt.

“The NRA’s claimed financial status has finally met its moral status: bankrupt. While we review this filing, we will not allow the NRA to use this or any other tactic to evade accountability and my office’s oversight," she said.

Following the civil suit announcement, Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee called on the IRS to review the tax-exempt status of the NRA and NRA Foundation.
Trump seeks to freeze $27.4 billion of programs in final week of presidency

BY JOSEPH CHOI AND NIV ELIS - 01/14/21 THE HILL

President Trump on Thursday moved to freeze $27.4 billion worth of government programs in the last week of his presidency using a budget maneuver called rescission.

Under the 1974 Budget and Impoundment Control Act, the president can request that Congress rescind, or wind back budget authority over certain programs. While Congress considers the request, the programs can be frozen for up to 45 days, at which point the request expires if Congress does not act.

In a letter to congressional leadership, Trump specifically requested 73 cutbacks to the 2021 federal budget. The 73 proposed rescissions largely align with the annual budget proposal Trump has set out, which proposed extreme cuts to domestic programs. Congress roundly rejected the cuts each year.


The letter asked leaders in the House and Senate to impound funds from almost every Cabinet-level agency including the Environmental Protection Agency. The request also included cuts from the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities, the Peace Corps and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars among a slew of others.

Trump had signed the $2.3 trillion omnibus spending bill in December, but had indicated that he would make requests for “wasteful items” to be cut.

The spending package included coronavirus relief that doled out $600 stimulus checks to Americans.

"I will sign the Omnibus and Covid package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed," said Trump at the time. “I will send back to Congress a redlined version, item by item, accompanied by the formal rescission request to Congress insisting that those funds be removed from the bill."

Congressional Democrats were quick to reject the proposal Thursday.

“President Trump’s proposed rescissions attack a broad swath of critical programs that help make life better for Americans and sustain our leadership around the world," said House Appropriations Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), noting targeted cuts for renewable energy, small financial institutions, and international food and vaccine aid.

"Can you think of anything more immoral?" she asked.

Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.), chairman of the House Budget Committee, said the cuts were an attempt by Trump to inflict damage.

“These rescissions are filled with damaging and irrational cuts to programs critical in the fight against COVID-19, climate change, and strengthening America’s global leadership," he said.

But with just days left in his administration, the rescission request is likely to do little more than temporarily delay programs.

President-elect Joe Biden will be sworn in to office Jan. 20 amid a tense time in Washington, D.C., as the capital endures the fallout of the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol.

Updated 8:04 p.m.
Trump sold off the Arctic Refuge — Biden can help save it


BY KARLIN ITCHOAK, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 01/15/21 

THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

© Getty Images


On Jan. 6, the Trump administration — with the full support of Alaska’s congressional delegation — trampled the human rights of the Indigenous Gwich’in people and doubled down on the climate crisis by auctioning off the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to the oil industry for a paltry $14.4 million.

In the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Republicans promised that lease sales in the refuge would bring at least $1 billion. Now, America’s biggest, greatest wild landscape has been sold for relative pocket change.

The Gwich’in call the coastal plain — a 1.6 million-acre strip of land at the edge of the Arctic Ocean in northeastern Alaska where drilling would occur — “Iizhik Gwats’an Gwandaii Goodlit,” or the Sacred Place Where Life Begins, because the caribou herd is vital to their history and culture and sustains their remote communities by providing the majority of their food. My relatives in the Arctic, the Iñupiat, rely on Arctic marine species for their cultural and traditional diet and spiritual wellbeing, which would be negatively impacted by increased oil infrastructure on Alaska’s North Slope.

Alaska Native peoples have protected this place for thousands of years, but the Trump administration didn’t care about Indigenous concerns. It repeatedly ignored pleas from the Gwich’in people for the government to respect their sovereignty and rights.

In August, the United Nations took extraordinary measures to call for an investigation into the United States regarding violations of the Gwich’in peoples’ human rights from proposed oil and gas development. After the government accelerated the leasing processes, the U.N. submitted a rare follow-up inquiry asking for further precautionary measures given the severity and urgency of the situation.

Nevertheless, proponents of drilling recklessly charged forward to ensure that leases were sold before the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, who has long opposed industrialization of the Arctic Refuge. They did this knowing the majority of people in the United States oppose drilling for oil and gas in the refuge. They did it knowing that instead of doubling down on oil, we should be looking for alternative energy sources that don’t harm people and our planet. They did it knowing that their scheme would likely permanently destroy the home for polar bears, wolves, migratory birds and the calving grounds of a 200,000-animal caribou herd. They knew they were throwing fuel on one of America’s highest-profile fights over climate and environmental justice.

Quite simply, the lease sale was irresponsible and should never have happened. The industry’s lack of interest is proof. Recognizing a bad prospect when they see one, none of the major oil companies submitted bids. They know the public opposes drilling, oil reserves are unproven and that the United States’ six largest banks have staked out positions against financing development in the refuge as have Canada’s five largest banks. The banks obviously see the potential for financial risk and reputational damage.

Enter the state of Alaska, which purchased nearly all of the tracts sold. The state made a legally questionable decision to pour more than $12 million, almost the entirety of the bids received in the lease sail, into the scheme via the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority because a few key people in the state feared the embarrassment of a federal lease sale attracting zero bids from oil companies. As an Alaskan whose ancestors have been here since time immemorial, I could not be more disappointed in the state’s actions, and its indifference to the harm that will be caused to the Gwich’in and to my fellow Alaskans who are already being harmed by our state’s budget cuts.


Amid a major budget crisis, Alaska threw millions of dollars into leases we could not afford, and that no one else wanted. It illustrates how much our state leaders are incapable of imagining a post-oil economy as North Slope production creeps toward its inevitable decline.

Those of us who work to protect the Arctic Refuge find hope in the election of Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, and their commitment to make the Arctic Refuge a priority. We encourage their administration to explore all viable options and to take immediate, decisive action to halt any oil and gas development activities from moving forward in the refuge.

We hope the Biden-Harris administration — including Rep. Deb Haaland (D-N.M.), who is set to become the first Indigenous leader to serve as secretary of Interior — will work with local Indigenous communities to identify a feasible, long-term plan that includes Indigenous people in management of the Arctic Refuge. We know it’s possible to address the climate crisis and preserve the coastal plain for generations to come, while still allowing for responsible and sustainable economic development.

Native peoples have occupied the Arctic and have been stewards of the land for millennia, just as we have successfully stewarded lands across the United States. Our involvement in management of public lands is crucial, and key to protecting our inherent inalienable rights and for protecting Mother Earth.

Karlin Itchoak is the Alaska state director for The Wilderness Society. Follow the organization on Twitter @Wilderness.





Major Oil Companies Take A Pass On Controversial Lease Sale In Arctic Refuge



January 6, 2021
TEGAN HANLON,NAT HERZ, FROM


Caribou graze on the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The Trump administration has held the first oil lease sale in the refuge.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

One of the Trump administration's biggest environmental rollbacks suffered a stunning setback Wednesday, as a decades-long push to drill for oil in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ended with a lease sale that attracted just three bidders — one of which was the state of Alaska itself.

Alaska's state-owned economic development corporation was the only bidder on nine of the parcels offered for lease in the northernmost swath of the refuge, known as the coastal plain. Two small companies also each picked up a single parcel.

Half of the offered leases drew no bids at all.

"They held the lease in ANWR — that is history-making. That will be recorded in the history books and people will talk about it," said Larry Persily, a longtime observer of the oil and gas industry in Alaska . "But no one showed up."

The sale generated a tiny fraction of the revenue it was projected to raise.
It was a striking moment in a 40-year fight over drilling in the coastal plain, an area that's home to migrating caribou, polar bears, birds and other wildlife. It also potentially sits atop billions of barrels of oil, according to federal estimates.

But amid a global recession, low oil prices and an aggressive pressure campaign against leasing by drilling opponents, oil analysts have for months been predicting little interest in the sale.

Persily took the sale as evidence that while drilling in the refuge remains a long-held dream of some politicians, it is no longer treasured by oil companies.

"It was, in the oil industry terms, a dry hole. A bust," he said. "They had the lease sale, the administration can feel good about it, but no one's going to see any oil coming out of ANWR."

Even Kara Moriarty, head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, acknowledged that the sale results weren't as "robust" as expected. But she said the industry still supports future access to the coastal plain.

"Today's sale reflects the brutal economic realities the oil and gas industry continues to face after the unprecedented events of 2020, coupled with ongoing regulatory uncertainty," she said in a statement.

The lease sale raised a total of $14.4 million in bids, according to the Bureau of Land Management, the federal agency that held the sale. Nearly all of that came from Alaska's state-owned economic development corporation, the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority.


ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY COLLABORATIVE
As Oil Drilling Nears In Arctic Refuge, 2 Alaska Villages See Different Futures

Half of the cash will go to the federal government, and half will go back to the state of Alaska.

Rep. Deb Haaland at a 2018 rally in Washington, D.C., to oppose drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. President-elect Joe Biden has tapped Haaland to lead the Department of the Interior.Liz Ruskin/Alaska Public Media


The amount raised is nowhere near what was projected when a Republican-led Congress officially opened the coastal plain to drilling in 2017 as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The bill ordered two lease sales, the first by the end of this year, with the revenue aimed at offsetting massive tax cuts.

Despite the lack of industry interest, Alaska's Congressional delegation applauded the sale on Wednesday, and so did officials with the Bureau of Land Management, describing it as historic and a success.

"It was a joke"

Opponents had a different reaction.

"I laughed out loud. It was a joke. A joke to the American people," said Desirée Sorenson-Groves, director of the Arctic Refuge Defense Campaign.

"I'll tell you, I have a message to those who bid today, there were only three. But here's the message: 'You will never ever drill in the Arctic Refuge. We'll stop you.'"

The land that received no bids on Wednesday will not be leased in this sale.

Of the two small companies that did win leases, one is Regenerate Alaska, a subsidiary of Australia-based 88 Energy. The other is Knik Arm Services, a small Alaska company managed by an investor named Mark Graber.

The state-owned entity which dominated the sale, has never held federal oil leases before.

But Alaska politicians, including former Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski, recently pushed the state to bid, citing the lack of industry interest. Murkowski, in an interview Wednesday, said he expects the corporation to eventually partner with companies to do the actual drilling.

"We'll see how good an investment it is when we see what the interest is from some companies to negotiate," he said.

The oil leases are still not finalized.

That process, which includes an anti-trust review by the U.S. Department of Justice, typically takes about two months. But the Trump administration is expected to rush to issue the leases formally before the president leaves office in two weeks.

Even if it succeeds, additional oil leasing and drilling in the refuge will face headwinds, said U.S. Rep. Jared Huffman, D-Calif., a longtime drilling opponent.

He said his next step will be pushing for "permanent protection" for the Arctic refuge. He's likely to have support from a Biden administration. The president-elect and his appointee to lead the Interior Department have both said they oppose drilling there, and Georgia's run-off elections give Democrats control of the Senate along with the House.

Huffman said he's open to a compromise with drilling boosters — from the state of Alaska to Indigenous Iñupiaq leaders in Kaktovik, the only community inside the refuge's boundaries — that would provide them with alternative paths toward economic development.

"We're not hostile to taking care of the interests here, and helping put folks on a path of economic development that makes sense and that's sustainable," Huffman said.

Roger Herrera, a retired BP executive and longtime lobbyist for an Alaska group that pushed Congress to open the refuge, said he was "hugely disappointed" in the results of the sale.

"Alaska is a natural resource state," he said in a phone interview. "You take away its natural resources and it has basically nothing."

Pompeo's flurry of foreign policy moves hampers Biden start

BY LAURA KELLY - 01/14/21 THE HILL 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is pushing through last-minute foreign policy decisions ahead of President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration as part of an effort to cement his and the Trump administration’s legacy in their final tumultuous and violent days in office.

The moves are likely aimed at hampering efforts by Biden to reverse Trump-era policy measures, creating a laundry list of intricate policies, big and small, that will take time, effort and organization to unravel.

With less than a week left in office, while much of Washington is focused on President Trump’s second impeachment, Pompeo has instituted a flurry of policy changes and ramped up a public relations campaign to tout the administration’s accomplishments.


He has elevated U.S. relations with Taiwan in an affront to China, designated Yemen’s Iranian-backed Houthis as a terrorist organization and put Cuba back on the list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Ryan Hass, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, called Saturday’s announcement on Taiwan “the policymaking equivalent of a hit-and-run.”

Pompeo “announced a policy shift on one of America’s most sensitive foreign policy issues in his final days in office, and with full knowledge he will not be around to contend with the consequences,” Hass said.

Ash Jain, a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council who has served as a State Department official in Republican and Democratic administrations, said the eleventh-hour actions by Pompeo “reflect a desire to box in the incoming administration.”

Removing the designation of the Houthis as a terrorist organization is one area where Biden is likely to have bipartisan support.

Neither Democrats nor Republicans are sympathetic to the Houthi separatists, viewing them as responsible for gross atrocities in Yemen’s six-year civil war and dangerous allies with Iran, but Pompeo’s recent action toward them united lawmakers in opposition, saying such a designation would hinder the delivery of critical humanitarian aid to Houthi-controled areas.

Experts say Pompeo’s action toward the Houthis is part of his push to solidify his legacy on Iran.


The secretary is the chief enforcer of the administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Tehran, a policy geared toward financially and diplomatically isolating the Islamic republic in an effort to thwart its nuclear ambitions and eliminate the threats from its proxy forces in the Middle East.

“The administration is seeking to fortify its pressure campaign against Iran in advance of the Biden administration, particularly given concerns that Biden may seek to return to a deal with Iran,” said Varsha Koduvayur, a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a think tank that has been supportive of the administration's policy toward Iran.

Koduvayur added that designating the Houthis as a terrorist group "will severely impact humanitarian aid efforts in Yemen and will constrain the ability of the US, and likely the UN also, to play a role in the diplomatic process. It will certainly clip the Biden administration’s wings, at least in the beginning."

Biden has vowed to return the U.S. to the 2015 Obama-era nuclear deal if Iran returns to compliance. The agreement aims to reduce Iran’s uranium enrichment to levels that would significantly delay the time it would take to obtain nuclear capabilities.

The Trump administration, buoyed by Republican support, pulled out of the nuclear deal in 2018, and Pompeo has remained forceful in his arguments against any rapprochement with Iran.

“Let’s not lie to the American people about Iranian moderation and pretend appeasement will work,” Pompeo said in a speech Tuesday at the National Press Club.

He later announced new sanctions against members of the al Qaeda terrorist organization being harbored in Iran, adding to what he said were nearly 1,500 sanctions levied by the Trump administration against individuals and entities that contribute revenue to the Iranian government.

Pompeo announced even more sanctions on Wednesday, targeting two charitable organizations controlled by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, charging the charities with corruption and enriching the religious and political leader.

Tehran is likely to benefit from immediate sanctions relief if the U.S. reenters the 2015 nuclear deal, though it won’t eliminate all of those imposed under Trump.

Kaleigh Thomas, an associate fellow at the Center for a New American Security, which has been critical of Trump's foreign policy, said that while the administration’s decisions are not impossible for Biden to reverse, they will still eat up time and energy.

“It will take time, effort, and potentially even political capital to determine which policies must be rolled back and to actually undo those identified as roadblocks to the implementation of the Biden administration's agenda,” she said.

“And in the context of all the Biden administration will have to address outside of the Middle East portfolio starting on Day One — including the ongoing pandemic and the Capitol Hill insurrection last week — it's important to remember that time, effort and political capital are finite resources.”

It’s unclear how those resources will be directed toward action on Cuba. Pompeo’s last-minute designation of the country as a state sponsor of terrorism is being viewed as a direct snub and obstruction of Biden’s promise to return to Obama-era diplomatic engagement with Havana.

“Secretary Pompeo has self-righteously defended Donald Trump’s worst foreign policy failures, and on his way out the door he seems intent on making things as difficult as possible for his successor,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), an advocate for engagement with Cuba, and the highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Lawrence Ward, a partner at the international law firm Dorsey & Whitney who works with international businesses to prevent running afoul of federal sanctions on foreign governments, said reversing the Cuba designation will require time and energy that will be critical for larger issues like combating COVID-19 and confronting more threatening foreign adversaries.

“Removing the designation would require a certification to Congress. And because the Biden administration will be focused on achieving as much bipartisan support as possible on a host of important domestic issues, it is tough to imagine that the administration will prioritize such a certification over ongoing tensions with China, Iran and Russia,” he said.

Jain, of the Atlantic Council, expressed more optimism about the ability of the Biden administration to quickly reverse or scale back some of Pompeo’s last-minute moves.

"Most of these policies can be fairly easily reversed, and the Biden team is certain to give careful scrutiny to each of these eleventh-hour actions. In others, it may need to navigate through various review processes," he said.

Pompeo, who is considered a potential 2024 presidential candidate, has been using his official government Twitter account since Jan. 1 to lay out what he views as his and the Trump administration’s greatest successes.

On Wednesday, he issued a farewell ahead of Biden’s inauguration, saying followers should migrate to his personal page.

“One week from today, I will be stepping aside as Secretary of State and this account will be archived. Be sure to follow me @mikepompeo. Go do it now.”

 Opinion

How the Capitol police privileged white rage

When Black-led groups protest, the Capitol police don't open barriers for us or gently point the way.

(RNS) — I’m so damn tired of living in a country that treats Black grief as a threat and white rage as a sacrament.

I’m upset, but I’m not shocked, that self-entitled and enraged White supremacists — incited by our sociopath president — attacked our nation’s Capitol building, just as I was angry, but not surprised, four years ago, when the Capitol police arrested members of our Black-led protest in that same building.

Our crime? Singing, with the Bishop William Barber III, Rabbi Sharon Brous and a gathering of multiethnic leaders outside then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office to demand that the Republican Senate not take away the Affordable Care Act. 

The Capitol police were not opening barriers for us; they did not gently point the way for us. We were Black, and though our protest was appropriate, we were in danger by putting it on display. Earlier, when a Black-led group of leaders staged a die-in on the floor of a cafeteria in the building, we got up at the third warning because the police meant business, and we were afraid.

I’m disturbed about the insurrection of January 6, 2021, and all the circumstances that led up to it. But I disagree with President-elect Biden’s claim that “this is not America.” In fact, it is precisely who we are and who we have always been. White rage is privileged over Black grief.

The first time I experienced white rage was in kindergarten, where I was the only Black child in Mrs. Easley’s classroom, and my best friends were the two Tommies — one blonde and one red-haired. We took naps and ate lunch together. When Lisa, a girl with brown bobbed hair and green eyes, moved to our Air Force base in New Hampshire, she brought the word “n@gger” with her and called me one right before naptime.

At 5, Lisa was already angry that I had something I didn’t deserve — the friendship of these two white boys. Mom had the talk with me that night, that some people wouldn’t like me just because I was Black. She was being gentle; she and Dad grew up in Jim Crow Mississippi and had plenty of experience with white rage.

Mom’s talk opened my eyes and ears to the racism around me. I saw the picture of 14-year-old Emmett Till’s lynched body on the cover of Jet magazine, his face bloated, an eye missing, because he flirted with a white woman. I saw the violent rage of the white police beating marchers on the Pettus Memorial Bridge

Closer to home, I saw the police viciously beat Mr. Johnson across the street from our house while arresting him for outstanding parking tickets. I heard his cries, saw his head bleeding, saw their red faces, twisted in rage.

It was white rage clothed in white sheets that terrorized Black people, hanging men, women and children from trees like strange fruit, gouging eyes, burning flesh. White churchgoers watched and took pictures of the lynchings, holding their children on their shoulders for better sight lines.

Rage baptized the children in the blood of Black people, in the stench of white supremacy. Training them to grow up hating Black people, feeling entitled to step on the rights of Black people, to be in the front of the line, to earn more, live in better spaces and have better schools than Black people. Teaching the children that they have the right to have their knees on the necks — on the fate — of Black people.

And should the Blacks dare to demand equal treatment, dare to protest their existence, dare to write the fury and sadness, the children should grow to resent this as a loud annoyance intended to frustrate the status quo.

Thus, white rage turned brutal at Black wealth amassed in Black communities, enraged at Black students getting into Ivy league schools, enraged that a Black man named Obama with a Muslim name could become president of the United States.

White rage turns violent when beautiful Black trans and queer people dare to walk down the street in freedom; the joy itself incites rage. Chants of Black Lives Matter causes enraged white people to counter that all lives matter. What they really mean is that if a Black life matters, then their white life doesn’t matter enough.

White rage is as American as apple pie. Thomas Jefferson planted the seeds of it in his “Notes on the State of Virginia,” when discussing the emancipation of enslaved Africans:

The first difference which strikes us is that of colour… And is this difference of no importance? Is it not the foundation of a greater or less share of beauty in the two races? … They seem to require less sleep. A black after hard labour through the day, will be induced by the slightest amusements to sit up till midnight, or later, though knowing he must be out with the first dawn of the morning. … They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation. Their griefs are transient.

Black grief is not transient; it is generational, incarnate in our bodies. When Black grief dares to mourn publicly, dares to speak the truth of the permanence and pernicious nature of the white entitlement that formed our nation on stolen land, and built it with the brutal system of chattel slavery, that grief is met with disdain. We’re told to get over it.

When teenage boys rap their grief, dance their grief, take their grief to the streets, that grief is criminalized, amplified, coated in words like Black on Black crime. When Black grief is expressed in writing, in social media, in art and song, it is fetishized, appropriated, caricatured.

When Black grief shows up in the office and dares to speak up, demand the demolishing of ceilings, white backlash and white rage interprets that grief as “too angry” for a team player who can’t be coached, and therefore not promoted. Black grief, which of course is angry, is shut down, cut off.

So the grief festers, rots, depresses and kills the soul of Black folk. When Black grief protests, marches in the streets, dies-in on a national floor, it is snatched from the ground, put in handcuffs, thrown in a cell. Beaten like Fannie Lou Hamer and John Lewis. Shot like Medgar Evers and Martin King.

Still, Black grief is prophetic. It knows how to weep, wipe its tears and build a movement. It knows how to keep its eyes on the prize and hold on. It knows that anyone who believes in freedom cannot rest until it comes, until the death — and the life — of a Black mother’s child is as important as a white mother’s child.

Black grief is resilient because it knows its help comes from God, that its hope is built on the love of a poor, brown, Jewish Palestinian baby named Yeshua. It knows that the moral arc of the universe bends toward justice and that nothing is going to turn us around. Black grief gives way to Black joy, because though weeping lasts for a season, joy always comes in the morning.

We are perched upon a dangerous precipice. The meagre gains of Reconstruction were dismantled and gave way to Jim Crow because politicians ignored Black grief and acquiesced to white rage, as they did on Wednesday at the Capitol, as they did in Minneapolis in May: Which of us can forget the rage in the face of the white police officer who crushed George Floyd under his knee?

Who could not recognize the white rage in the violent mob (let’s not call that protest) that rioted in our capital to disrupt our democratic process?

That mob was handled gently, as though their rage was holy. White murderous rage has been tolerated, celebrated and acquitted throughout our history.

But now our leaders must take a different road, one that recognizes white rage for the terrorism it has always been and tend to the Black grief that has been ignored and suppressed for far too long.

As people of faith and moral courage, we must accept our leadership role and join together in prophetic grief and divine outrage to critique our racist culture in which being Black is a preexisting condition for poverty, discrimination and death.

The Rev. Jacqui Lewis. Photo courtesy of Béatrice de Géa

Anti-Black racism is a festering sore, a putrid hole in the soul of America that will only heal with moral courage and furious intention. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for to write a new American story. We must organize across our differences and build strategies for a better tomorrow. We who believe in freedom cannot rest until it comes.

(The Rev. Dr. Jacqui Lewis is senior minister of Middle Collegiate Church in Manhattan. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)

How self-proclaimed ‘prophets’ from a growing Christian movement provided religious motivation for the Jan. 6 events at the US Capitol

Because Trump is God’s chosen candidate, they believe, any other candidate, no matter what the vote totals show, is illegitimate.

(The Conversation) — In addition to symbols of white supremacy, many of the rioters at the Capitol on Jan. 6 carried signs bearing religious messages, such as “Jesus Saves” and “In God We Trust” while others chanted “Jesus is my savior and Trump is my president.” In a video interview, one of those who breached the Senate floor describes holding a prayer to “consecrate it to Jesus” soon after entering.

Many white evangelical leaders have provided religious justification and undying support for Trump’s presidency, including his most racially incendiary rhetoric and policies. But as a scholar of religion, I argue that a particular segment of white evangelicalism that my colleague Richard Flory and I call Independent Network Charismatic, or INC, has played a unique role in providing a spiritual justification for the movement to overturn the election which resulted in the storming of the Capitol.

INC Christianity is a group of high-profile independent leaders who are detached from any formal denomination and cooperate with one another in loose networks.

Prayer marches

In the days and hours leading up to the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 the group Jericho March organized marches around the Capitol and Supreme Court building praying for God to defeat the “dark and corrupt” forces that they claimed, without evidence, had stolen the election from God’s anointed president – Donald Trump.

Jericho March is a loose coalition of Christian nationalists formed after the 2020 presidential election with the goal of overturning its results. Leading up to and following the Capitol violence, their website stated: “We are proud of the American system of governance established by our Founding Fathers and we will not let globalists, socialists, and communists destroy our beautiful nation by sidestepping our laws and suppressing the will of the American people through their fraudulent and illegal activities in this election.” This statement as well as others were removed some time after the Capitol riot.

Jericho March’s main activity has been organizing prayer marches around Capitol buildings around the nation after the election, imitating the “battle of Jericho” in the Bible. In this biblical battle God commanded the army of his chosen people, the nation of Israel, to blow trumpets and then march around the city walls until God brought the walls down and allowed Israel to invade and conquer the city. According to the Bible, this was the first battle that the nation won in its conquest of Canaan, the “promised land” that it occupied afterward.

Jericho March’s activities culminated in a large prayer rally on Dec. 12 in Washington, D.C., that included prayer marches and speeches on the mall by convicted and pardoned former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, former U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, the Trump-supporting founder of MyPillow Mike Lindell and far-right Oathkeepers militia founder Stewart Rhodes.

Michael Flynn among other speakers at a Jericho March rally.

They also held prayer marches and vigils around the Supreme Court and Capitol surrounding the Jan. 6 election certification. Jericho March members believe that their prayer marches will help defeat the corrupt forces they claim, without the basis of any evidence, “stole” the election and that God will install Trump in his rightful place as president on Jan. 20.

Their strategy is peaceful prayer marches, however. After the Capitol violence they released this statement: “Jericho March denounces any and all acts of violence and destruction, including any that took place at the U.S. Capitol.”

There is no evidence that anyone affiliated with the Jericho March organization took part in the Capitol breach. However, their leaders, I argue, are providing the religious motivation for the fight to overturn the election. Here’s why.

‘Prophets’ and Charismatic Christianity

A key part of the Jericho March events has been a group of INC Christians who claim to be modern-day “prophets,” including Lance WallnauCindy Jacobs and Jonathan Cahn.
Charismatic Christianity, similar to Pentecostal Christianity, emphasizes the “gifts of the Holy Spirit,” which include healing, exorcism, speaking in spiritual languages, and prophecy – defined as hearing direct words from God that reveal his plans for the future and directions for his people to follow.

Scholars use the term Charismatic to describe Christians in mainline or independent churches that emphasize the gifts of the spirit as opposed to Pentecostal Christians, who are affiliated with official Pentecostal denominations. Independent Charismatic Christians tend to be more unorthodox in their practices, as they are less tied to formal organizations.

In our research, we found that in most Charismatic churches, those who receive visions or direct words from God that make predictions that later correspond to events or have uncanny insights into people’s lives are seen to have the “gift of prophecy.” Some particularly gifted “prophets” are seen as being able to predict world events and get directions from God regarding entire nations.

While most Charismatic churches do not engage in this world-event predicting type of prophecy, some independent, high-profile leaders that do have become increasingly important in INC Christianity.

‘Seven mountains of culture’

Before the 2016 election a group of INC “prophets” proclaimed Trump to be God’s chosen candidate, similar to King Cyrus in the Bible, whom God used to restore the nation of Israel. After their prophesies of Trump’s winning the election came true, these “prophets” became enormously popular in INC Christianity.

In our book, we showed that INC Christianity is significantly changing the religious landscape in America – and the nation’s politics – by providing an unorthodox theology to promote conservative Christians rising to power in all realms of society. It is the fastest-growing Christian group in America.

BIG BROTHER 

Worshippers pray with Texas Gov. Rick Perry, seen at center and on screen, at The Response, a day long prayer and fast rally, Saturday, Aug. 6, 2011, at Reliant Stadium in Houston. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)

Between 1970 to 2010, the number of regular attenders of U.S. Protestant churches as a whole shrank by an average of .05% per year. At the same time, independent Charismatic churches, a category in which INC groups reside, grew in attendance by an average of 3.24% per year. According to the World Christian Database there are over 36 million people attending U.S. independent Charismatic churches – that is, those not affiliated with denominations.

INC beliefs are different from those of most traditional Christian groups, including those affiliated with official Pentecostal denominations. INC promotes a form of Christian nationalism the primary goal of which is not to build congregations or to convert individuals, but to bring heaven or God’s intended perfect society to Earth by placing “kingdom-minded people” in powerful positions at the top of all sectors of society, the so-called “seven mountains of culture” comprising government, business, family, religion, media, education and arts/entertainment.

One INC leader we interviewed in 2015 explained, “If Christians permeate each mountain and rise to the top of all seven mountains … society would have biblical morality, people would live in harmony, there would be peace and not war, there would be no poverty.” They see Trump as fulfilling God’s plan to place “kingdom-minded” leaders in top government positions, including Cabinet members and Supreme Court appointments.

Trump as God’s chosen president

Many of those referred to as prophets in INC Christianity predicted another Trump victory in 2020. After his Nov. 3 loss, many we have studied have not recanted their prophecies, and have adopted Trump’s conspiratorial rhetoric that the election was fraudulent. Many believe that the demonic forces that have stolen the election can still be defeated through prayer.

For INC Christianity’s “prophets,” Trump is God’s chosen candidate to advance the kingdom of God in America, so any other candidate, no matter what the vote totals show, is illegitimate.The Conversation

(Brad Christerson is a professor of sociology, at Biola University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)