Saturday, February 27, 2021

How the fight over 'hero pay' for grocery workers reveals chain stores' massive corporate greed

PAUL CONSTANT
FEB 27, 2021, 
LM Otero/AP Photo
A grocery store worker inspecting meats while wearing PPE during the pandemic.

Paul Constant is a writer at Civic Ventures and a frequent cohost of the “Pitchfork Economics” podcast with Nick Hanauer and David Goldstein.
In this week’s column, Constant talks about the ‘hero pay’ raises some stores like Trader Joe’s and Kroger adopted last year.

Kroger later blamed this raise for store closures, despite paying out billions in profits to the company’s shareholders.


Last March, when lockdowns began, grocery store workers and delivery drivers were rightfully hailed as heroes of the pandemic. Even as restaurants and bars closed to stop the spread of coronavirus, grocery store employees risked their health, and the health of their families, to keep Americans fed while white-collar workers transitioned to home offices. From the very beginning of the pandemic they put on homemade masks to stock shelves, ring up customers, and keep the supply chain working when everything else shut down

At the beginning of the pandemic, public respect for grocery workers was overwhelming and unanimous

Rodney McMullen, the chairman and CEO of the Kroger chain of grocery stores, was effusive in his praise: “Our associates have displayed the true actions of a hero,” McMullen wrote in a press release, acknowledging his staff for “working tirelessly on the frontlines to ensure everyone has access to affordable, fresh food and essentials during this national emergency.”

McMullen backed up his words of support for the heroes on his staff with a bold policy: Kroger, the largest grocery chain in the nation and the second-largest retailer after Walmart, announced on March 31, 2020 that it would “provide all hourly frontline grocery, supply chain, manufacturing, pharmacy and call center associates with a Hero Bonus – a $US2 ($3) premium above their standard base rate of pay, applied to hours worked March 29 through April 18.”

Kroger’s Hero Bonus pay program eventually ended in May, two months into the pandemic. But the pandemic has continued unabated, and grocery store workers continue to live with a very high risk of COVID-19 infection. A Kroger-owned Fred Meyer grocery store in Seattle had an outbreak infecting 10 workers in December, for example. 

Although the risks for grocery workers are still very high, the hero talk has all but disappeared

And so has the hero pay: Kroger employees from around the country report on Indeed that baggers at Kroger grocery stores earn an average of $US9.28 ($12) an hour, while cashiers report pay of $US10.53 ($14). (Bear in mind, too, that those average wages are likely inflated due to cities like Seattle and New York City that embraced a $US15 ($19) minimum wage .) According to nearly 37,000 employee reports, Indeed said, “Few people think they are paid fairly at Kroger Stores.” In exchange for putting their health on the line for a full year in thankless public-facing jobs, many Kroger workers earn wages that don’t even lift them above the poverty line.


This year, leaders began to demand that grocery stores pay their employees extra during the pandemic. Lawmakers in Long Beach and in Seattle, among other cities, passed a $US4 ($5)-per-hour hazard pay bonus for workers at large grocery store chains.

The laws brought some much-needed attention back to workers who have disappeared from the public consciousness, and that pressure seems to have worked: After Seattle’s City Council approved hazard pay, grocery chain Trader Joe’s responded by temporarily raising worker pay around the country by $US4 ($5) an hour.

This is great economic news for everyone: not only are workers being rewarded for performing tasks that white-collar workers would never do, but those workers also have extra money in their pockets, which they’ll spend in their communities – including at grocery stores.
How Kroger responded very differently than Trader Joe’s

In both Long Beach and in Seattle, Kroger issued press releases announcing that they were closing two stores, blaming the hazard pay for the closures.

I suspect the situation in Long Beach is similar, but since I live in Seattle I can better speak to the closures here. The two QFC grocery stores that Kroger is closing in Seattle are small, underperforming stores in upscale, walkable neighborhoods that have other – most would argue superior – grocery options nearby. (The other thirteen QFC stores owned by Kroger in Seattle will remain open, as well as Kroger’s three Fred Meyer stores inside Seattle city limits, where the hazard pay applies.)


And, at least one of the targeted Seattle QFC locations had already been slated for redevelopment in the near future. In other words, it seems likely that Kroger could be exploiting stores that were failing before the pandemic to make the point they really want made – if city councils elsewhere try to raise wages, Kroger will continue to hold their employees’ lives and livelihoods hostage in order to keep wages low and profits sky-high.

Giant corporations love to use splashy intimidation tactics like this to create fear-inducing headlines which help to peel support away from worker protections. But make no mistake: Even though Kroger’s press releases suggested that the grocery business relies on “razor-thin” profit margins, Kroger has been making a ridiculous amount of money during the pandemic.

Because people have been working and eating at home over the last year, Kroger has boasted of record-breaking profits. For the first two quarters of 2020, reports the Detroit Free Press, its net earnings nearly doubled “to more than $US2 ($3).031 billion compared with $US1.069 billion in the same period of 2019.” 

In the third quarter of 2020, Kroger announced operating profits of
$US792 ($1,020) million

And with grocery spending in Washington state up by double-digit percentages since the beginning of the pandemic, it seems highly unlikely that hazard pay is the tipping-point expense that forced Kroger to pull the plug on these stores.

And while Kroger isn’t willing to pay the “heroes” its leadership loves to praise in press releases, the corporation happily opened their wallets for shareholders this year, paying out a dividend of 18 cents ($0.23) per share.

Last year, Kroger said in a press release, “We have returned approximately $US6.4 ($8) billion to shareholders via dividends and repurchased shares [also known as stock buybacks] since the beginning of fiscal 2017.” As thanks for returning obscene profits to shareholders, CEO W. Rodney McMullen received $US21 ($27) million in total compensation in 2019, an increase of 76% over the year before and 798 times the median annual Kroger employee salary that same year.

McMullen wasn’t the only one who received hero pay a year before the pandemic, ExecPay noted: “In 2019, six Kroger executives received on average a compensation package of $US8.7 ($11) million, a 46% increase compared to previous year.”

While Kroger can find plenty of money for its CEO, its executive team, and its shareholders, the corporation picks up its toys and heads home when city lawmakers ask it to increase pay for the frontline workers who have been putting their lives on the line so that Kroger can boast about their unprecedented profits.

The math is clear: Kroger’s coffers are more than full enough to reward its employees for their essential work in the midst of a global pandemic. McMullen and his executive team apparently prefer to keep that “hero pay” for themselves.

Republicans take aim at billions set aside in stimulus bill for infrastructure and transport projects, including Amtrak, BART, and 
a bridge to Canada

KEVIN SHALVEY
FEB 27, 2021, 
Andrew Harnik/AP PhotoPresident Joe Biden and his wife, Dr. Jill Biden, board an Amtrak train during the 2020 presidential campaign.

The $US1 ($1).9 ($2) trillion stimulus plan passed by the House included funding for Amtrak and BART.

About $US1 ($1).5 ($2) billion would go to the Amtrak train system, Biden’s
favored mode of transport. 

Rep. Kevin McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers said some of the infrastructure spending was pork.


Billions from the $US1 ($1).9 ($2) trillion stimulus bill passed by House lawmakers on Friday would go to transportation and infrastructure projects, including extending a subway in Silicon Valley, operating a bridge to Canada, and maintaining the nation’s railway system.

In total, more than $US40 ($51) billion would go to infrastructure and transportation projects, including about $US30 ($39) billion to public transit, and about $US8 ($10) billion to airports. Rep. Kevin McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers said some of that infrastructure spending was pork, calling attention to projects in the bill in areas represented by high-profile Democrats.

“This bill is actually too costly, too corrupt, and too liberal,” McCarthy told Fox News.

The 591-page bill passed by the House on Friday included $US1 ($1).5 ($2) million for operations and maintenance for the Seaway International Bridge, which connects New York to Canada. In a statement, Rep. Daniel Webster, of Florida, said the bridge funding was a “pet project” of Senator Chuck Schumer, majority leader, who represents New York.


Politifact, the fact-checking group at The Poynter Institute, said the Seaway funding had originally been requested by President Donald Trump’s administration in May 2020.


Also in the House bill was more than $US100 ($129) million for an extension of the Bay Area Rapid Transit subway system in San Jose. The money would go toward connecting the BART subway line to Mineta San Jose International Airport, a “long-planned” route extension, according to The San Francisco Chronicle.
—Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) February 24, 2021

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Republican, called the plan “Pelosi’s Subway,” although the construction would happen just south of Pelosi’s district, as The San Jose Mercury News reported.

The bill also had more than $US1 ($1).5 ($2) billion for Amtrak, President Joe Biden’s favorite mode of transportation. That funding included about $US820 ($1,056) million for the Northeast Corridor, about $US680 ($875) million for the national rail network, and about $US166 ($214) million for long-distance service restoration and employee recalls, according to the text of the bill.

Rep. Ben Cline added the Amtrak spending to his list of “the most egregious provisions unrelated to COVID” in the stimulus bill.

In a statement, Cline said: “Not only is this legislation riddled with wasteful spending unrelated to COVID and bailouts for blue states like New York and California, but with more than $US1 ($1) trillion in previously authorized coronavirus funds still unspent, it is premature.” 
 IT IS BEING HOARDED BY REPUBLICAN GOVENORS
The White House is beginning to look past recreational marijuana use to fill key Biden administration roles

YELENA DZHANOVA
FEB 27, 2021
Jamie Grill/Getty Images

The Biden administration will overlook past recreational drug use to open up the pool of prospective applicants for key White House roles.

Biden officials recognized that potential applicants might have difficulty securing positions without a waiver dismissing pot consumption, NBC News reported.

Previous users must not use pot during their tenure in office and undergo random drug tests. 

The White House on Friday said it would begin to permit people who’ve used marijuana recreationally to apply for roles within the Biden administration.


The new policy means that some people who’ve used pot on a “limited” basis” will not be penalized by being denied the chance to work in the White House, NBC News reported.

A White House official told NBC News that the policy changed after “intensive consultation with security officials.”

The change will be implemented on a “case-by-case basis,” NBC News reported. Only individuals applying to positions that don’t require a security clearance can receive a waiver overlooking past marijuana use.

Marijuana is not legal under federal law. But there’s a growing movement to legalize pot, and multiple cities and states have been taking the lead on it. In the latest development, Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York signaled in January that he intends to make marijuana legal in the state.


“I think this should’ve been passed years ago,” Cuomo said during a January press briefing. “I think too many people have been imprisoned, incarcerated, and punished. Too many of those people are Black, Latino, and poor. It’s exaggerated the injustice of the justice system.”

Biden officials recognized that potential applicants might have difficulty securing positions without a waiver overlooking recreational marijuana use, NBC News reported.

More than three dozen states have legalized marijuana for either recreational or medical consumption.

The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.

But in a statement to NBC News, a White House official said that President Joe Biden “is committed to bringing the best people into government – especially the young people whose commitment to public service can deepen in these positions and who can play leadership roles in our country for decades to come.”

“The White House’s policy will maintain the absolute highest standards for service in government that the President expects from his administration, while acknowledging the reality that state and local marijuana laws have changed significantly across the country in recent years,” the statement continued.

Individuals who are granted a waiver and secure a White House position must agree to not use pot during their tenure in office. They also must undergo drug testing at random intervals, according to NBC News.

These guidelines would “effectively protect our national security while modernizing policies to ensure that talented and otherwise well-qualified applicants with limited marijuana use will not be barred from serving the American people,” a White House official told NBC News.
CENSORSHIP;OZ #3 AND TRYING HARDER
TikTok says it faced 32 government requests to remove content in Australia in the second half of 2020 – with only Russia and Pakistan making more requests

DAVID ADAMS
FEB 25, 2021

Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

Social media platform TikTok says it received 32 government requests to remove content in Australia over the second half of 2020.

In a new report, TikTok said those requests led to 74 user accounts being banned or restricted.

Only in Russia and Pakistan did TikTok receive more government requests to remove content.

In its new Transparency Report, published on Wednesday night, TikTok shared some insight into its moderation process, including tallies of external demands to strike content from its platform.

TikTok said that between July 1 and December 31, it received 32 government take-down requests in Australia concerning 98 individual accounts.

Of that number, 74 accounts were removed or restricted.

The short video app counted a total of 16 videos removed or restricted after those clips were highlighted by a government agency or representative.

“When we receive requests from government agencies to restrict or remove content on our

platform in accordance with local laws, we review all material in line with our Community Guidelines, Terms of Service, and applicable law, and take the appropriate action,” the report said.

“If we believe that a request isn’t legally valid or doesn’t violate our standards, we may restrict the availability of the reported content in the country where it is alleged to be illegal or we may take no action.”

Only in Russia and Pakistan did TikTok receive more official requests to remove content, with those markets reporting 135 and 97 government take-down notices, respectively.

TikTok Australia was unable to provide Business Insider Australia with further details regarding figures listed in the report.
20 accounts highlighted in legal and emergency data requests

Separately, TikTok said it had received four legal requests to turn over user data in Australia over the second half of 2020.

Of those requests, only one was granted.

In its report, TikTok said law enforcement agencies may request non-public user information, should they have court orders or other legal documents granting them the authority to do so.

Those documents are “carefully reviewed for legal sufficiency” before any data is turned over, TikTok said.

In addition, TikTok said it fielded eight ’emergency’ requests for data, linked to instances where TikTok has “reason to believe, in good faith, that the disclosure of information is required to prevent the imminent risk of death or serious physical injury to any person.”

Six of those requests were granted.

All told, 20 individual accounts were linked to legal and ’emergency’ requests for data.

Australia’s recent history of content takedowns

While recent headlines have been dominated by the Federal Government’s heavyweight bout with Facebook over the news media bargaining code, the latest TikTok figures add an intriguing new layer to Australia’s short and contentious relationship with the social media newcomer.

In September last year, Prime Minister Scott Morrison demanded TikTok remove horrific footage of an American man taking his own life, after the video was inadvertently viewed by young Australians nationwide.

The footage, which originated on Facebook, reportedly evaded the app’s moderation systems when users embedded it in seemingly innocuous videos.

Those clips played for several seconds before cutting to the graphic footage.

“Platforms like TikTok need to put in more resources to detect and tear down this sort of harmful content,” Morrison said at the time.

“That is their responsibility.”


At the time, a TikTok spokesperson said its systems were working to automatically detect the footage.

The platform also thanked users who “reported content and warned others against watching, engaging, or sharing such videos on any platform”.

Morrison added that the eSafety Commissioner – the governmental body tasked with ensuring the safety of Australians online – liaised with TikTok about the issue.

Business Insider Australia has contacted the Office of the eSafety Commissioner for comment.

Outside of that kind of distressing footage, it is not unthinkable that the Federal Government would ask TikTok to remove content it deems offensive.

In November, Morrison demanded Twitter remove a doctored image posted by a Chinese diplomat, which appeared to show an Australian special forces soldier killing an Afghan child.

The post – a sharp jab at allegations that war crimes had been committed by Australian troops in Afghanistan – was an “absolutely outrageous and disgusting slur,” Morrison said.

89 million videos removed worldwide

According to Roy Morgan estimates, TikTok counted some 2.5 million Australians users in the first half of 2020.

Given the recent scrutiny – and regulatory burdens – that governments like Australia’s have placed on social media giants like TikTok, the Transparency Report appears to be the platform’s attempt to prove users don’t scroll through an unmoderated wasteland.

“We believe that feeling safe is essential to feeling comfortable expressing yourself authentically, which is why we strive to uphold our Community Guidelines by removing accounts and content that violate them,” said Brent Thomas, TikTok’s regional director of public policy, and Arjun Narayan Bettadapur Manjunath, the app’s head of trust and safety for the APAC sector.

The report claims TikTok removed more than 89 million videos worldwide in the six months leading to December 31, with six million accounts removed for violating the app’s guidelines.

Update: This article has been amended to reflect the fact that footage of a man taking his own life originated on Facebook.

UNSUSTAINABLE
Bitcoin's energy use is 'staggering' and a worry for big investors, Kleinwort investment chief says


HARRY ROBERTSON
FEB 27, 2021
Olga Maltseva/Getty Images 
Bitcoin mining uses vast amounts of electricity.

Bitcoin uses a “staggering” amount of energy each year, the chief investment officer of Societe Generale’s UK private bank said.

Fahad Kamal said it means bitcoin clashes with the new focus on environmental investing.

Yet advocates say that bitcoin mining can be powered by renewable energy.


The energy use of bitcoin is a key factor that makes the cryptocurrency unattractive to institutional investors, the chief investment officer of Société Générale’s UK private bank has said

“We are very alarmed, I’m sure as others are, by the environmental aspects of bitcoin,” Fahad Kamal, the investment boss at SocGen’s Kleinwort Hambros bank, told Insider. He said the energy it used was “staggering.”

Estimates from the University of Cambridge suggest that bitcoin uses more electricity each year than Argentina and Ukraine, due to the energy-intensive mining process.

As the price of bitcoin has soared in recent months, a number of investors have raised questions over bitcoin’s energy consumption. Yet others argue that bitcoin increasingly uses renewable energy – and will do so more in the future.

Bill Gates told CNBC’s Andrew Sorkin in a live-streamed Clubhouse session last week that the currency “uses more electricity per transaction than any other method known to mankind.”

Kamal said bitcoin’s energy use means it clashes with environmental, social and governance investing, which is becoming increasingly important in the financial world.

“If you think about various trends that are occurring in the market, right now, bitcoin is one but ESG is a much bigger one.”

The issue of bitcoin’s energy use has come to the fore in recent weeks, after Elon Musk’s electric car company Tesla announced it had bought $US1.5 ($2) billion of the currency in January.

Bitcoin is “mined” when computers are hooked up to the cryptocurrency’s network to verify transactions. As a reward for this work, which involves solving puzzles, miners can sometimes receive small amounts of bitcoin.

Some miners have hooked up whole warehouses of computers to try to get more bitcoin, using vast amounts of electricity.

Yet Matt Blom, head of trading at Nasdaq-listed crypto exchange group Diginex, said fears about bitcoin’s environmental impact were overblown, because in the future almost all mining could be done through renewable energy.

“As time goes by I think that is the way things are going to be,” he told Insider.

A report from Cambridge University in September 2020 estimated that 39% of proof-of-work mining is powered by renewable energy, primarily hydroelectric. And it said more than 70% of miners used renewables as part of their energy mix.

Kamal said: “You can imagine that bitcoin gets environmentally friendly too and is only mined using solar power, but we’re not there yet.

“As of right now, it’s a huge consumption of electricity used to mine it. And that electricity is produced in very dirty ways.

“And for us, that is a big factor,” he said. “The fact that bitcoin is dirty, relatively speaking, is a pretty big issue.”

However, Kamal said Kleinwort Hambros – which is part of SocGen’s €119 billion ($US1.5 ($2) billion) private banking network – does not have a “black and white view” of cryptocurrencies.

“There’s obviously some really positive aspects to it, and some not.” He said many of bitcoin’s problems, such as high volatility, would become less serious if more people adopted the cryptocurrency.

Electric bikes could get much cheaper under a new proposal from two House Democrats

TIM LEVIN
FEB 27, 2021, 2:30 PM


Rad Power BikesThe bill aims to spur e-bike sales and encourage more people to ditch their cars.

A new proposal from two House Democrats could dramatically cut the cost of buying a new e-bike. 

The E-BIKE Act aims to make e-bikes more accessible and to cut the country’s carbon emissions. 

It would provide up to a $US1,500 ($1,931) credit to subsidize 30% of the cost of a new e-bike. 

There are plenty of reasons to buy an e-bike. They offer all the benefits of a normal human-powered bike, but with considerably less sweating and much more utility. Plus, for certain people, they can replace car trips, cutting down on congestion and curbing harmful emissions. 

But one major hurdle to widespread e-bike adoption remains: cost. 

Although some manufacturers are taking it upon themselves to sell low-cost e-bikes – Rad Power Bikes’ new $US1,099 ($1,415) RadMission 1 is an example – by and large, high-quality e-bikes are out of reach for the average consumer. A new proposal from two House Democrats aims to change that.

This month, Reps. Jimmy Panetta and Earl Blumenauer – of California and Oregon, respectively – introduced the Electric Bicycle Incentive Kickstart for the Environment (E-BIKE) Act, a tax-credit program that aims to spur e-bike sales.

The act would cover 30% of the cost of a new e-bike up to $US1,500 ($1,931) and would apply to new bikes that cost $US8,000 ($10,299) or less. The idea, they said, is to encourage people to take fewer car trips and ultimately reduce their carbon footprint.

“E-bikes are not just a fad for a select few, they are a legitimate and practical form of transportation that can help reduce our carbon emissions,” said Rep. Panetta in a statement. “My legislation will make it easier for more people from all socio-economic levels to own e-bikes and contribute to cutting our carbon output.”

According to the lawmakers, the environmental impact of such a program could be huge. If 15% of car trips were replaced by an e-bike – an ambitious goal – carbon emissions could drop by 12%, they said in a press release, citing an October study out of Portland State University. That makes sense, given that the transportation sector is the single largest source of greenhouse-gas emissions in the US, and passenger cars are the biggest polluter within that category.

The proposal isn’t without precedent. It resembles a federal tax credit program that gives buyers of certain low- and zero-emission cars a rebate worth up to $US7,500 ($9,656). Some politicians and advocates have long argued that a similar incentive should be extended to electric bikes.

In 2019, California passed a bill that provides residents of low-income and disadvantaged communities up to $US7,500 ($9,656) toward the purchase of an e-bike or bike-share membership if they trade in their car. And multiple European countries including France, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom have introduced some form of e-bike subsidy.

Bicycling and sustainability groups welcome the policy.

“Incentivizing electric bicycles makes them a competitive transportation option for more Americans and supports a national effort to lower carbon emissions,” Jenn Dice, CEO of advocacy organization PeopleForBikes, said in a statement. “The E-BIKE Act positions rightfully electric bicycles as a critical part of a larger solution to climate change and equitable mobility.”

President Joe Biden’s sweeping plans to transition the US away from fossil fuels – and the fact that Democrats control both chambers of congress – mean that the E-BIKE Act may not be such a stretch. Biden also aims to electrify the federal government fleet, establish half a million new charging stations, and support EV research
Rand Paul is facing backlash for his anti-trans comments equating gender-affirming surgery to 'genital mutilation'

YELENA DZHANOVA
FEB 27, 2021, 

Sen. Rand Paul compared gender-affirming surgery for trans people to “genital mutilation” during a hearing for Dr. Rachel Levine.

Levine, if confirmed by the Senate, will be the first openly trans official approved by the chamber.

Some of Paul’s Democratic colleagues sharply rebuked his remarks. 

During confirmation hearings for Dr. Rachel Levine for assistant health secretary, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky conflated gender-affirming surgery with “genital mutilation.”

Paul on Thursday during a hearing before the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee questioned Levine on her stances regarding healthcare for transgender youth. In doing so, he attempted to correlate transition-related surgery with genital mutilation – a practice health officials have previously called a human rights violation that “has no health benefits.”

“Genital mutilation is considered particularly egregious because … it is nearly always carried out on minors and is a violation of the rights of children,” Paul, a former ophthalmologist, said.

Paul then tried to portray Levine as a supporter of “surgical destruction of a minor’s genitalia,” asking her if she believed minors could make “such a life-changing decision as changing one’s sex?”

“For most of our history, we have believed that minors don’t have full rights and that parents need to be involved,” Paul said. “We should be outraged that someone’s talking to a 3-year-old about changing their sex.”
—Chris Johnson (@chrisjohnson82) February 25, 2021

Levine, a pediatrician and an advocate for hormone therapy, has never said children should receive gender reassignment surgery.

“Transgender medicine is a very complex and nuanced field with robust research and standards of care that have been developed,” Levine said in response to Paul. Levine also told Paul she’d further discuss the subject with him if confirmed by the Senate.

Levine, if approved, will become the first openly trans official confirmed by the Senate.

Paul’s comments led to immediate backlash from Democratic lawmakers, who supported Levine.

Sen. Patty Murray, a Democrat from Washington and the chair of the Senate health committee, rebuked Paul’s questions.

“It is really critical to me that our nominees be treated with respect and that our questions focus on their qualifications and the work ahead of us, rather than on ideological and harmful misrepresentations like those we heard from Senator Paul earlier,” Murray said on Thursday.

Paul’s office did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment.

Levine, 64, is a professor of pediatrics and psychiatry at the Penn State College of Medicine. She also serves as the president of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.

In separate remarks on Thursday, Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer condemned Republican lawmakers speaking out against trans rights.

Republican “attacks on trans people and the transgender community are just mean,” Schumer said during an in-person press briefing. “And show a complete lack of understanding and a complete lack of empathy. They don’t represent our views, and they don’t represent the views of a majority of Americans. Their despicable comments just make my blood boil with anger. If I didn’t have a mask, you could see my teeth gritting.”

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
United Airlines has agreed to pay $49 million to resolve DOJ allegations of mail delivery data fraud


KEVIN SHALVEY, BUSINESS INSIDER FEB 27, 2021, 
Jeff Chiu/AP Photo
A United Airlines airplane takes off over another United plane on the runway at San Francisco International Airport.

United Airlines agreed to pay $US49 ($63) million to resolve criminal and civil claims, the DOJ said.

The airline was accused of falsifying international delivery data from 2012 and 2015. 

United received millions of dollars in payments based on the data, according to DOJ officials.


United Airlines has agreed to pay about $US49 ($63) million in penalties to resolve criminal charges and civil claims for supplying the US Postal Service with fraudulent data about international mail delivery, according to the Justice Department.

DOJ officials said United employees submitted false international delivery scan data between 2012 and 2015, making it appear that United and its partner airlines were delivering the mail in a timely way.

“Instead of performing this duty with transparency, United defrauded the US Postal Service by providing falsified parcel delivery information over a period of years and accepting millions of dollars of payments to which the company was not entitled,” Nicholas L. McQuaid, acting assistant attorney general, said in a statement.

United entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ criminal division, agreeing to pay about $US17 ($22) million in criminal penalties and returned payments, the DOJ said on Friday. The Chicago-based airline also settled a claim under the False Claims Act with the DOJ civil division, for which it will pay about $US32 ($41) million.

As part of an international mail-delivery contract, United was expected to give the US Postal Service barcode scans of mail receptacles when they received the receptacles in the US and then again when they dropped them off overseas.


The USPS payments to United were based on the airline’s delivery times. But United’s Cargo Division falsified delivery scan info, gave that data to the USPS, and collected payments based on the falsified data, according to the DOJ.

“Through this data automation scheme, United secured millions of dollars in payments from the USPS to which United was not entitled” under the contracts, the DOJ said in a statement on Friday.

The mail shipped overseas by commercial airlines, like United, included parcels sent to US foreign posts and soldiers at foreign operating bases, said Steven Stuller, director of the USPS Office of Inspector General, in a statement.

According to DOJ officials, some employees at United concealed the problems related to scanning and moving mail, because they knew they’d be penalized if the fraud was discovered.

“The attempts to hide the automation practices included efforts to revise the falsified delivery times to make the automated scans appear less suspicious to USPS,” said the DOJ in its statement.

Insider has reached out to United for comment.
Led by CEO Ian Watson, Cellcard is building on its rollout of Cambodia's first 5G use case by tapping into the country's youth-driven mobile market


FEB 24, 2021
Ian Watson, CEO of Cellcard



Led by CEO Ian Watson, Cellcard is one of Cambodia’s largest and most innovative telco firms

Cellcard is tapping into the youth market — and gamers in particular — to help drive mobile penetration

This year the company launched its dedicated esports division, hosting competitions and live-streaming events

In a short time, Cellcard has already increased its proportion of the youth segment among its customer base by more than 50%

Because of his work, Business Insider named Watson to our annual list of the
10 leaders transforming consumer tech in Asia.


Despite the ongoing impact of COVID-19, 2020 was a historic year for Cambodian telco Cellcard. Led by CEO Ian Watson, Cellcard rolled out Cambodia’s first 5G use case – a telemedicine service introduced across four key health facilities in the capital of Phnom Penh to help cope with the pandemic.

This was a significant milestone for both Cellcard and Cambodia, a country with one of the least developed digital infrastructures in the Southeast Asia region. When Watson joined the company in 2012, Cambodia was still very much playing catch up to some of its more developed neighbours. However, by 2018, and with an investment of over US$300 million, Cellcard had established a 4G LTE network that covered 90% of the country. 5G will be the next stage of this evolution.

Technological development aside, 2020 has also represented a transformation in Cellcard’s business strategy, with more emphasis being placed on the large Cambodian youth market to help drive digital adoption, with a particular focus on growing and supporting the country’s young gamer community.

Cambodian demographics favour the youth market


The attraction of the youth segment in Cambodia is clear. Out of a population of roughly 17 million, it is estimated that close to 50% are under the age of 25. As these young people start to come online and access the internet, mobile is the dominant platform. Cambodia now has roughly 21 million mobile connections, with over 14 million enjoying 3G or 4G broadband access.

Cellcard has launched various youth-focused initiatives over the past 12 months. In May, it brought together a number of its musical ambassadors for a Cellcard 4U Virtual Concert to entertain Cambodian families at home during COVID-19. More than 1.7 million viewers watched the concert live on the night on the local MYTV channel, with an additional 5 million online video views of the concert highlights.

In July, the company announced its support to local education infrastructure by establishing an e-learning platform for continued education in a joint collaboration with the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS) and Ministry of Posts (MPTC). The app allowed students across Cambodia to continue their studies online, with Cellcard providing free data access between select hours.

But it is one youth demographic sub group in particular where Cellcard has been concentrating its marketing and customer engagement activities this year, and that is gamers. Over the past three years, Cellcard has been investing in promoting and facilitating a mobile gaming culture, and these efforts were ramped up significantly in 2020 with the formal launch of an esports division

“In a market where 48% of the population are under the age of 25, operators and brands have to be youth focused,” says Watson. “There is enormous growth potential for Cellcard in the youth segment. Previously it has been known as the operator for the older business and professional segment, but this is changing as we evolve our digital offerings to be youth centric, especially our move to lead esports in Cambodia.”
Using gaming and esports to drive smartphone penetration

Cellcard’s gaming legacy began just three years ago, with the launch in 2017 of Super Data Race, a Pokémon-style mobile game. Several other popular mobile games followed, but what really transformed Cellcard’s youth appeal has been how it has tapped into the emergence of a hugely popular esports community.

Cambodia has seen a rapid rise in demand for gaming and esports among its youth, not only domestically but also internationally as gamers connect with their peers in the wider region through regional competitions and livestreamed matches. Cellcard was Cambodia’s first telco to stage an esports tournaments back in 2018 and since then has been nurturing the gaming community across the country.

Earlier this year Cellcard launched PlayGame, Cambodia’s first gamer platform, supported by PlayGame Unlimited, a data plan created exclusively for gamers. PlayGame, which partners with leading global game developers such as Tencent, Netease and Moonton, gives customers access to a full range of gaming experiences including online esports tournaments that offer cash prizes and in-game incentives. This year, Cellcard has held almost 200 esport and arcade tournaments and live-stream events, garnering 75.9 million impressions on the PlayGame platform.

The company is also working closely with gaming influencers, with 20 dedicated gamer influencers on its roster. Leveraging these relationships, the company this year developed its own esports-focused TV Show called PlayGame TV. The show is dedicated to celebrating and sharing the gamer lifestyle in Cambodia and features its influencer talent pool as hosts. The first season of eight episode aired simultaneously on local free-to-air TV and Facebook and reached over 9 million viewers.

“We have some of Cambodia’s best performing social media channels including one million-plus fans on TikTok,” says Watson. “Our engagement rates are high as we are very active with social influencers and content creators which is driving more youth customers to Cellcard.”

Youth engagement is already delivering results


The investment in youth and in particular the promotion of esports and gaming is already having a positive result on Cellcard’s business. The company says that gaming is helping it drive smartphone penetration and data usage, particularly in provincial areas. Cellcard has increased the mobile data traffic over its network by 32% this year, while the proportion of young consumers on its customer base has grown from 26% to 40%

Cellcard says it is confident it is on the right track and will continue to lead the esports agenda and grow the gamer and Esports community in the country. The company says it will continue to add more billing and payment choices to give gamers more convenient transaction options.

At the same time Cellcard is continuing to expand its 4G LTE network — as well as beginning to open its 5G network — which it says will further improve speeds and counter latency and jittering issues for gamers. Ultimately, Cellcard argues that increased digital access will benefit not just gamers or young people, but Cambodia as a whole.

“We have entered the digital age, and telecommunication companies such as Cellcard are playing a key role in driving transformation of the people, of companies and of the nation,” says Watson. “Digital empowerment will transform people’s lives for the better by advancing education, health, agriculture and manufacturing, and deliver to all Cambodians, access to the world.”


Dems Will Seek Other Ways to Achieve Minimum Wage Boost, Will Still Support Relief Bill, Prof Says

 A man holds up a minimum wage sign at a rally held by fast food workers and supporters to celebrate the California Labor Commissioner’s order for the company to rehire and compensate workers who went on strike for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) protections, in Los Angeles, California, U.S., February 18, 2021.

OPINION

The proposal to raise the minimum wage in the US to $15 an hour, put forth by US President Joe Biden, has not been included in the country's coronavirus relief bill, as was initially promised by the Democratic Party. House Democrats passed a bill including it, but it will be left on the cutting room floor when it gets to the Senate.

Timothy Hagle, a political science professor at the University of Iowa, argues that despite the minimum wage provision not being included in the coronavirus bill that will hit the Senate floor, Democrats will not want to jeopardise other provisions they support by voting the bill down.

Sputnik: How can the ditching of the minimum wage provision from the COVID relief package affect the unity of the Democratic Party, given that progressives were very supportive of it?

Timothy Hagle: This is an interesting question. On the one hand, not having the $15/hr provision might guarantee a few moderate Democrats in the Senate would be more likely to support the resulting stimulus bill. On the other hand, more progressive Senators might balk at not including that provision. The concern of progressives is that it's unlikey the $15/hr provision would pass on its own. That means it would need to be included in some other bill that would make it hard for other Senators to vote against it.

Even so, given the current even split in the Senate, Republicans could filibuster any regular bill. The opportunity that currently presents itself is that under reconciliation only a majority is needed to pass this bill rather than the usual 60 votes to end debate under filibuster rules. Unfortunately for the Democrats, there are certain rules about what can be part of a bill under reconciliation, the so-called Byrd Rule. The requirement is that the provision involves taxing and spending. The parliamentarian ruled that the $15/hr provision doesn't qualify, so can't be included.

Not surprisingly, several progressives, in particular some members of the US House, have criticised the parliamentarian and complained about the ruling. Senator Sanders has said that the provision must be included in the stimulus bill and has urged his Senate leadership (i.e., Schumer) to find a way to include it.  

One way might be to get rid of the filibuster rule. This is something Democrats have talked about, but at least one Democrat (Manchin of West Virginia) has said he'd not support such a move.

On the whole I don't think that not including the provision would hurt party unity that much, but it could certainly lead to some vocal reactions and the Biden administration would need to do some damage control by promising to find another way to get to that goal.

Sputnik: How can disagreements within the party ranks affect the passage of Biden's COVID Relief Bill?

Timothy Hagle: Assuming that the $15/hr provision doesn't make it into the bill in some way, it doesn't seem likely that Democrats would vote against it. There are lots of other things in the bill that they support and they wouldn't want to jeopardise getting them. What they can do is object strongly to not having the $15/hr provisions and possibly extract promises from either Senate leadership or the Biden administration to find other ways to achieve that goal.

Sputnik: Does the disposal of the minimum wage provision indicate that the Biden administration can deviate from its campaign pledges in the future?

Timothy Hagle: The Biden administration would likely argue that it isn't deviating from its pledge, just that it needs to find a different way to achieve it. More generally, it's not unusual for presidential candidates to make promises on which they can't deliver. In the case of Biden, although Democrats control both houses of Congress, the margins are so small that it will make major or controversial changes difficult. It also means that it's easy to blame Republicans for blocking some of his policy objectives. Biden has used Executive Orders to achieve some policy objectives but there are limits to that approach. At times he will need to get Congress to act. If they don't, then he can use that as a political issue for the 2022 and 2024 elections.