Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Baboons can reproduce social conventions to problem solve: study


It took the baboons about three days to establish a system for choosing the same image 
(AFP/Odd ANDERSEN)

Tue, December 14, 2021

French researchers have observed non-human primates developing social conventions to work together to obtain a reward, in an experiment set up with a group of baboons.

About twenty baboons raised at a primatology centre were given the task in pairs of making the same choice when each presented with a set of two images on touch screens.

If both animals made the same choice, they were rewarded with a treat.

It took the baboons about three days to establish a system for choosing the same image, even when they could not see their partners' choices, says the report, published Monday in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

While previous research had shown that primates were capable of social conventions like grooming, this is the first to show a new behaviour appearing spontaneously in a group, without human intervention.

The experiment was conducted by French national research institute CNRS and Aix-Marseille University.

Over the course of tens of thousands of tests the baboons developed a hierarchy for the images presented, the researchers noted.

At first the baboons could see what was happening on other animals' screens, but in the second phase of the experiment that visual cue was taken away.

"The group's performance didn't budge," the study's main author, cognitive psychology researcher Anthony Formaux told AFP.

"It surprised us when they continued to choose the same image without being able to imitate each other."

Researchers ruled out the possibility of a simple shared affinity for certain colours by repeating the experiment with black and white designs.

According to the study, for a behaviour to be considered a social convention its benefit must apply to the whole group, it must work consistently, and it must be one among several solutions.

Gestures such as shaking hands, embracing or bowing are social conventions that help groups resolve problems, it says.

"Language is one big convention," said Formaux, "From the beginning, individuals had to agree on the meanings of words."

As to how the baboons managed to share their hierarchy with one another, that remains a mystery.

"We suppose that they agreed on it -- but we don't know how," Formaux said.

juc/uh-nrh/jj
US officials eye fuel supply for advanced nuclear reactors

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — The development of commercial advanced nuclear reactors intended to help combat global warming and enhance national security will need a better supply of the right type of nuclear fuel, U.S. officials said Tuesday.

The U.S. Department of Energy sent out a request to companies that might be interested in participating to send ideas concerning its plans to establish a program to ensure the availability of high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU.

Information received will be used to prepare a report for Congress. It could also lead to the Energy Department taking the next step and asking companies to submit more detailed plans on how they might supply the nuclear fuel.

The $1 trillion infrastructure law President Joe Biden signed last month contains $2.5 billion for the Energy Department to establish the HALEU Availability Program. The goal is to produce enough high-assay low-enriched uranium for civilian domestic research and commercial use in the next wave of advanced reactors currently in development.

“Advanced reactors are an incredible asset to have in our collective fight against climate change,” Dr. Kathryn Huff, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Energy Department's Office of Nuclear Energy, said in a statement. “If we don’t proactively take the steps now to ensure a sufficient and diverse supply of HALEU, then reactor demonstration and deployment projects, like those funded in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, won’t be fueled in time to help us slow the impacts of climate change.”

Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by developing new technologies with nuclear power began during the Obama administration and have continued under both the Trump and Biden administrations.

The HALEU Availability Program "will help the U.S. maintain our nuclear supply chain, create high-paying manufacturing jobs, and reassert U.S. leadership on the international stage,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia said in a statement.

About 20% of the nation's energy comes from nuclear power produced at just under 100 nuclear power plants. Current reactor fuel, the Energy Department said, uses uranium enriched up to 5%.

Advanced reactors use HALEU enriched between 5% and 20%, which is required to produce more power in advanced reactors that are smaller than traditional nuclear power reactors.

The Energy Department's 890-square-mile (2,300-square-kilometer) site in eastern Idaho that includes the Idaho National Laboratory has been at the forefront in efforts to develop advanced nuclear reactors. The lab has the the Advanced Test Reactor, the world's most powerful test reactor, which produces neutrons so new materials and fuels can be tested to see how they react in high-radiation environments.

The site also contains the Transient Test Reactor, reactivated in 2017 after being put on standby in 1994 as interest in nuclear energy waned. The reactor was restarted to test nuclear fuels.

Primary obstacles U.S. officials face in revamping nuclear power are making nuclear power plants economically competitive and changing public perception among some that nuclear power is unsafe.

Critics of nuclear power say facilities for fuel production as well as power plants can be vulnerable to accidents and sabotage, and that the nuclear material itself could be used to make bombs.

Keith Ridler, The Associated Press
    Non-religious surge in US as Christianity declines


    Rev. Patrick Mahoney (C), director of the Christian Defense Coalition, leads a group in prayer as he holds a Good Friday service ahead of the Easter holiday outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, April 10, 2020 (AFP/SAUL LOEB)

    Tue, December 14, 2021, 11:53 AM·1 min read

    The number of Americans who identify as non-religious is soaring in the profoundly Christian United States, according to a Pew Research Center study published Tuesday.

    Some 29 percent of American adults are now religiously unaffiliated -- up from 16 percent 14 years ago -- the survey found.

    America is home to a powerful, socially conservative Christian right-wing political faction and Christianity remains the overwhelmingly dominant religion in the country.

    But the religion is declining markedly, the Pew results showed.

    Seventy-eight percent of US adults identified as Christian in 2007. Now, some 63 percent do, according to the research.

    In 2007, Pew began tracking religious "nones" -- people who describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or "nothing in particular."

    Then, Christians outnumbered nones by almost five-to-one. Today it is closer to two-to-one, the researchers said.


    Pew's researchers did not give reasons for the trend, but it is in line with the wider decline in Christianity across the West.

    In 2019, the center said the growth of religious nones in America was particularly evident among younger people.

    Pew's latest survey found that the secular shift was concentrated amongst Protestant communities, with the Catholic share of the population holding relatively steady in recent years.

    Some 60 percent of Protestants described themselves as born-again or evangelical Christian, Pew said.

    White evangelical Christians are among former president Donald Trump's most ardent supporters, with 84 percent of the group voting for him in last year's election, Pew said previously.

    Researchers quizzed almost 4,000 respondents between May and August this year for the survey released Tuesday.

    pdh/caw
    'Tis the season, once again: Evangelicals must save Christmas from an imaginary enemy

    Nathaniel Manderson, Salon
    December 12, 2021

    Woman wearing Christmas hat covering her ears (Shutterstock)

    Here comes my favorite season of the evangelical political calendar. It's time for the righteous war to save Christmas from the evil progressives with their "Happy Holidays" and their zero-tolerance policy for nativity scenes. Those heartless liberals will attempt once again to destroy the true meaning of Christmas, burn down all the Christmas trees (not just the one outside the Fox News building), spell it as "Xmas" and generally rip all mention of God from this holiest of holidays.

    No of course I don't believe any of that, despite my personal background as an evangelical pastor. In truth, this yet another political and cultural issue that has been created entirely out of whole cloth by the great distaction agents of the evangelical Republican machine. I believe this issue perfectly illustrates the blueprint behind the evangelical approach to politics. They start with a fake issue that requires no grounding in scripture, zero biblical evidence and zero change for anyone within their own group. It is easily identifiable and pushes emotional buttons, which makes it an easy money-raising grift for politicians and pastors, and reliably provides a seasonal ratings boost for Fox News. It's another issue where evangelicals get to pretend they are fighting for God's cause while in fact ignoring every issue that affects God's people. Lastly, they get to declare victory every year because, no matter what Donald Trump and any number of leading evangelicals may claim, there never was a war on Christmas conducted by liberals, atheists, Muslims, Jews, godless Communists and other infidels.

    The idea that somehow Christ's birthday — which definitely wasn't on Dec. 25, by the way — requires any form of annual celebration has no connection to Christ, his teachings or the Bible. I cannot even figure out what aspect of the "traditional" Christmas celebration has anything to do with Jesus. The madhouse shopping (both online and in person), the tree, the lights, the tinsel, the consumerist orgy of Black Friday and Cyber Monday and whatever other special days the marketing people can come up with this holiday season is a celebration of everything that money can purchase, and has literally nothing to do with the ministry of Jesus. Last I heard, according to Christian theology you cannot serve both God and money, and far too many are trying to do just that during the Christmas season — and for that matter all year round. Christ was removed from the Christmas season a long time ago, no matter what you call the holiday.













    RELATED: Meghan McCain suggests Fox Christmas tree arson attack is worse than GOP's assault on democracy

    No issue better exemplifies the misdeeds of the evangelical political machine than the fight to "save" Christmas from imaginary enemies who are supposedly trying to crush the joy out of the holiday with too much wokeness (or whatever). The enemy is said to be everywhere, yet somehow the fight is easily winnable. You will hear a handful of folks who announce, "I proudly say Merry Christmas," as if some committee of socialists or feminists were trying to prevent them from saying it. It is difficult for me to imagine Jesus Christ walking around an American town saying, "Hey, where's my nativity scene?" It's easier for me to imagine Jesus wondering why this country so many people claim is a "Christian nation" can ignore the plight of the poor, the sick and those newly arrived among us.

    Fighting the war on Christmas also allows the evangelical movement to ignore larger issues that plague millions of Americans during this time of year. The Christmas season is known pose specific difficulties for homeless veterans, for people without health insurance, for those who are struggling to get by, and for the sick, lonely and desperate. If I'm not mistaken, those are the people Christ called his followers to serve — but fighting to save Christmas from the liberals allows the evangelicals to ignore that urgent call.

    The annual declaration of victory is my favorite hypocritical element of this ritual war. At one point some years ago, former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly declared he had personally won this fight, saving Christmas for all real Americans. There could hardly be a better example of everything that is wrong with this movement: O'Reilly got his followers worked up about saving Christmas, while in his own life he was sexually harassing numerous women he worked with. That's very much like the evangelical movement: Find an issue to draw attention away from what you're doing in secret, very likely being acts of cruelty, oppression and ignorance. Victory is easily declared because there was no fight, except in the overheated evangelical imagination. Christmas always comes around every year and fake victory follows, along with great ratings for Fox News, fundraising for sanctimonious Republicans and big money flowing into evangelical churches.

    So, yes, for the next few weeks the battle will be joined again, and evangelical believers will once again be told the fight is difficult — but in the end (spoiler alert!) Christmas will be saved yet again. In truth, nothing much will occur to make this holiday season different: We will see no new laws enacted to help those in need, heal the sick, welcome the foreigner and serve the poor. But at least we get to say "Merry Christmas" — which of course we always did — and somehow that will make up for all our lost opportunities to make real change in Christ's name.

    I don't begrudge anyone the "Christmas spirit." But as I said earlier, nothing about our current Christmas culture has anything to do with Jesus, no matter what we may call the season. The life of Christ had nothing to do with decorated fir trees, expensive electronic gadgets or ugly sweaters. Maybe we could say it had something to do with giving and receiving gifts — but not in the literal or material sense. If we were truly to celebrate the ministry of Jesus in America, that would mean a celebration of sacrifice, mercy, forgiveness and humility. We're a pretty long way from that right now.


    Fox News accused of being ‘Jussie Smollett of cable’ after host claimed it was the victim of a 'hate crime'


    Brian Kilmeade

    Alex Henderson December 13, 2021

    Ever since an arsonist set a giant Christmas tree ablaze outside of the News Corps/Fox News building in Manhattan, pundits on the show have engaged in melodramatic, over-the-top hyperventilating about the attack. The Toronto Star’s Vinay Menon, in a recent column, argues that all this melodrama over the fire has made Fox News the “Jussie Smollett of cable.”

    Smollett is the actor who was convicted on five felony counts after, according to prosecutors, lying to law enforcement about being violently attacked by Donald Trump supporters in Chicago. The hate crime that Smollett reported, according to prosecutors, was a total fabrication.

    The Christmas tree fire was not a fabrication; the tree really was set ablaze. But Menon stresses that Fox News went way overboard with its coverage, noting that the right-wing cable channel hasn’t given the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building nearly as much coverage as it has given the Christmas tree blaze — a point that has also been made by CNN’s Brianna Keilar.

    Menon writes, “One of the network’s contributors, Rev. Jacques DeGraff, compared the tree inferno to the attack on Pearl Harbor…. But it was ‘Fox & Friends’ co-host Brian Kilmeade who blasted the snowflake pearl-clutching to Mars. While discussing this reckless vandalism by a troubled man of no fixed address, Kilmeade asked: ‘Who says it’s not a hate crime against us, against Fox News?’ And just like that, Fox News became the Jussie Smollett of cable.”

    Menon adds, “A hate crime?.... Are you seriously suggesting tree destruction is comparable to the murder of Emmett Till? Give your dopey head a shake.”

    US prep schools held student exchanges with elite Nazi academies

    The Conversation
    December 14, 2021

    Hitler's Youth march in Nuremberg in 1937 (German Federal Archives)

    In the summer of 1935, the Nazi government hijacked a student exchange program between leading American and German schools.

    The International Schoolboy Fellowship, as it was known, was first set up by Walter Huston Lillard, the headmaster of Tabor Academy in Massachusetts, in 1927 to foster better relations between all nations through schoolboy exchange. Participating countries included the U.S., Germany, France and Great Britain.

    Lillard believed “that misunderstandings and quarrels between nations often arise through long-distance misjudgments,” and that “the development of contacts … will tend to promote cordial relations and lasting friendships.”

    But by 1935, officials in charge of the Third Reich’s new elite schools, the National Political Education Institutes, or Napolas, had plans to appropriate the exchange program to promote National Socialist aims.

    These Nazi institutions were modeled on elite British public schools, the Prussian cadet corps and ancient Sparta. The schools educated boys aged 10 to 19, training them as future leaders.



    A story about the early days of the exchange program was published in The New York Times on Feb. 10, 1933.
    New York Times archive screenshot.

    On Feb. 12, 1935, Lillard and the International Schoolboy Fellowship were informed by the Napola authorities that they would exchange 10 American boys for 10 Napola pupils from July to December 1935.

    As I describe in my new book, “The Third Reich’s Elite Schools – A History of the Napolas,” the American exchange organizers were unaware that the German pupils and staff were charged with an explicitly propagandistic mission. The Germans’ aim: Counteract and neutralize the effect of anti-Nazi reporting in the American media, and favorably influence public opinion of the Third Reich.

    By 1938, 18 American prep schools were taking part in the Napola exchanges.

    Breaking the Olympic boycott


    Reinhard Pfundtner, the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking civil servant in the Third Reich’s Interior Ministry, was one of the first German boys selected for the exchange program. His participation helped ensure the effectiveness of this pro-Nazi propaganda campaign at the highest level.


    An account from one student at The Lawrenceville School of his time at a Napola school in the late 1930s.
    Courtesy of The Lawrenceville School Stephan Archives


    In his role as state secretary of the Third Reich’s ministry of the interior, Reinhard’s father, Hans Pfundtner, was one of the key architects of the Nuremberg Laws, which demoted Jews and Gypsies to a pariah status within Nazi Germany, and which were instrumental in the Holocaust’s genesis. Hans Pfundtner was also a member of the Olympic Committee. He intended to use the exchange as an opportunity to persuade Lillard, his son’s American headmaster, to lobby in favor of U.S. participation in the upcoming 1936 Winter Olympic Games in Germany.

    Hans Pfundtner and Lillard left letters, now preserved in the German Federal Archives, that show that the Tabor Academy principal was completely swayed by the Pfundtners’ pretense of disinterested friendship.

    In one letter dated Nov. 23, 1935, Lillard assured Pfundtner that his “excellent letter replying to … questions about the Olympic Games” had been “quoted by several of our good newspapers, and was included in the Associated Press service throughout the country. … Undoubtedly, this message of yours will be very helpful in submerging some of the false propaganda.”


    German students at the Rügen Napola school, on the island of Putbus, at shooting practice in 1944.
    Dietrich Schulz, Author provided

    Failed hopes for peace

    Many leading American prep schools took part in the Napola exchange program each year following 1935, including Phillips Academy Andover and Phillips Academy Exeter in New Hampshire, St. Andrew’s in Delaware, Choate and the Loomis School in Connecticut, and New Jersey’s The Lawrenceville School. Between 1936 and 1938, 15 American pupils each year learned at the Nazi elite schools for 10 months, while 30 Napola pupils spent five months each at the American schools.

    Even after the “Night of Broken Glass” pogrom in November 1938, in which over 7,000 Jewish businesses and over 250 synagogues in German territories were destroyed, Lillard still urged principals at the prep schools that were part of the Napola-ISF exchange to continue the program into the 1939-40 academic year.

    In a letter written after that event, Lillard said “If we continue to bring the boys together, something constructive may be accomplished; whereas, if we abandon all efforts in the direction of Germany, we are closing the opportunity for the future leaders to be enlightened … .”

    Despite the controversial nature of the exchange program, many of the schools whose archives I consulted for my book were most helpful and curious to learn more about their institutions’ unsuspected connections with the Third Reich.

    Trojan horse propaganda


    Given these exchanges, the Napola program appeared to have achieved some success in persuading their American partners to give the Nazi regime the benefit of the doubt, at least in the short term.


    Walter Huston Lillard, the Tabor Academy headmaster who supported the student exchange program.
    Wikipedia


    In response to negative media coverage on the violent persecution of Jewish Germans and other minorities that was taking place under the Nazi regime, the Napola pupils attempted to actively discredit these accounts as biased or as “Jewish propaganda.”

    According to accounts in surviving school newsletters, the Napola pupils were often able to convince their American hosts that events in Germany were not nearly as dire as press reports might lead them to believe. They were often given the opportunity to present their own political views, in speech and in writing.

    For instance, one exchange student at Tabor Academy, Wolfgang Korten, wrote in “The Tabor Log” in June 1939, “I was glad to talk to the American as a German about Germany, and to give him some ideas about my homeland, different from those he reads in his papers.” He also stressed that to wholly reject “fascism” and “Nazism” in the name of “democracy” was a mistake.

    Newsletter reports on both sides also suggest that the American pupils enjoyed getting to know the “new Germany” and could quite easily become sympathetic to their hosts’ political perspectives.

    One American pupil who attended the Napola in Plön, Germany, wrote in 1938 that the year he had spent there was the “greatest experience” of his life. Another was even discovered by his fellow Napola pupils practicing the Hitler salute in front of his mirror. Meanwhile, many staff and students at the U.S. academies kept in touch with their German partner schools even after the outbreak of war in 1939.

    To a present-day reader, the attitudes toward Nazi Germany depicted here might seem highly naïve. At the time, however, many educated Americans shared similar sentiments – curious, trusting in German good faith and willing to downplay or disregard prior reports of Nazi atrocities.

    That is, until the Nazis’ desire for war became impossible to ignore.

    Helen Roche, Associate Professor of Modern European Cultural History, Durham University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
    Michigan high school massacre: Another tragic example of how white privilege kills white people

    Chauncey Devega, Salon
    December 13, 2021

    Students, parents, teachers, and community members gather for a vigil at the Lake Point Community Church following a shooting at Oxford High School in Oxford, Michigan that left four students dead.(AFP)

    There is no area of American life that has not been impacted by the color line in a society where white people are granted unearned advantages over nonwhite people. This is not an opinion, but an empirical fact. American society is literally structured by racism and white supremacy.

    That is not to say that racism, white supremacy and white privilege benefit all people deemed "white" in the same way or to the same extent. Likewise, those same societal forces do not impact all people deemed "Black" or "brown" or otherwise not white in the same way either.

    In the United States, racism and white supremacy constitute a power relationship that both actively and passively causes harm to Black and brown people because of the color of their skin and the value Western societies have assigned to it.

    But they are not the only ones damaged. However counterintuitive this fact may be for some people, racism and white supremacy often hurt white people too.

    Let's examine one recent example. On Nov. 30, a 15-year-old high school student named Ethan Crumbley allegedly went on a shooting rampage at his high school in Oxford, Michigan, killing four of his fellow students and injuring seven other people. Crumbley surrendered to law enforcement — which is somewhat unusual in mass shootings of this kind — and has been charged with terrorism and first-degree murder, among other crimes.

    His alleged rampage was not a total surprise, but part of a much larger pattern of behavior. There had been indications for weeks (including posts on social media) that Crumbley appeared to be mentally unwell and a danger to himself and others.

    Teachers and school administrators met with the young man and his parents about his behavior, which included violent drawings and verbal threats, and also spoke with him separately on several occasions. One meeting with Ethan Crumbley and his parents took place only hours before the shootings. Law enforcement could have been included in the meetings by school officials but were not, and the young man's backpack was not searched on the day of the shooting. If it had been, presumably school officials would have found his gun.

    A teacher had also alerted school authorities that Ethan Crumbley was searching the internet on his phone for information about various types of ammunition. Instead of punishing him or seeking help, his mother, Jennifer Crumbley, sent him a text that read, "LOL, I'm not mad at you. You have to learn not to get caught."

    With that behavior, Jennifer Crumbley showed herself to be exactly the kind of mother that Rep. Madison Cawthorn, the far-right North Carolina Republican, has publicly encouraged to raise their sons as "monsters."

    Ethan Crumbley was allowed to return to class after his meetings with school officials, including on the day of the massacre. He allegedly used a 9mm semiautomatic pistol that his father, James Crumbley, gave him as a gift four days before the killings.

    After their son was arrested for his alleged crimes, James and Jennifer Crumbley fled the area. They were eventually found hiding in a partly abandoned industrial building in Detroit, about 45 miles south of their hometown. If these fugitive suspects had been Black, brown or Muslim it is entirely likely that they would have been killed by law enforcement. Instead, they were arrested unharmed. Their son was afforded the same type of privilege after allegedly committing mass murder.

    Crumbley's parents have been charged with involuntary manslaughter and other crimes. They have also been given the option of going free on bail before their trial — even after they already violated the law by (apparently) attempting to escape to Canada. Again, if the Crumbleys were not white, bail would either not be granted or imposed at an extortionate level.

    How many lives might have been spared in Oxford, Michigan, if not for the power of racism, white supremacy and white privilege?

    Because gun violence is not generally treated as a public health emergency, and because white privilege tends to erase the role of whiteness and white masculinity in gun violence, this society-wide problem has not been properly addressed — except for the ritual stupidity of "thoughts and prayers."

    The vast majority of school mass shootings are committed by white boys and white young men. As a result, they are seen as individual, anomalous events, rather than as a societal problem demanding intervention and resolution.

    When it comes to Black and brown young people accused or suspected of even minor criminal activity, white supremacy punishes them -- all too often in extreme ways. Through what has been called "adultification," Black and brown children, even when extremely young, are perceived as inherently dangerous, and not permitted the presumed innocence, vulnerability and need for care, concern and love that society typically grants white children and other young people.

    As a result, Ethan Crumbley was presumed to be innocent and incapable of hurting others. By comparison, Tamir Rice, who was 12 years old and playing with a toy gun in a park in Cleveland, was shot and killed by police only seconds after their arrival. Trayvon Martin, 17 years old, was stalked and killed by a street vigilante who was later acquitted of murder.

    Black and brown boys and girls are punished much more severely in American schools, compared to white students, for the same offenses.

    Ethan Crumbley and his parents are the product of an American gun culture rooted in a centuries-long history where guns were used to commit genocide against the continent's indigenous peoples and also to dominate and control Black people, whether enslaved or free. Guns were also central to a larger project of empire and expansion that involved the subjugation of nonwhite people in many different parts of the world. White America's relationship to guns and violence as an exclusive element of "white freedom" is also central to the Republican fascist project.

    Quite predictably, Ethan Crumbley's mother is a member of Donald Trump's political cult, a movement fueled by white supremacy, misogyny, sadism, anti-intellectualism and other antisocial tendencies. In a letter to Trump, Jennifer Crumbley wrote:

    Mr. Trump, I actually love that you are a bad public speaker because that showed sincerity, and humility. You changed your mind, and you said "so what." You made the famous "grab them in the pussy" comment, did it offend me? No. I say things all the time that people take the wrong way, do I mean them, not always. Do I agree that you should of shown your tax returns? No. I don't care what you do or maybe don't pay in taxes, I think those are personal and if the Gov't can lock someone up over $10,000 of unpaid taxes and you slipped on by, then that shows the corruption. I like that you have failed. I love it even more that those failures taught lessons and made you one of the most successful Business Men in my history.

    I love that you are not from the political spotlight, maybe you are the hope that can really uncover the politicians for what I believe they really are. I have high hopes you will shut down Big Pharma, make health care affordable for me and my MIDDLE CLASS family again. I hope you uncover the cure for cancer, because there is one, we all know it, but you are the one to prove it. I'm not scared of your big personality and quick temper….


    My parents teach at a school where their kids come from illegal immigrant parents. Most of their parents are locked up. They don't care about learning and threaten to kill my mom for caring about their grades. Do you realize Mr. Trump that they get free tutors, free tablets from our Government so they can succeed. Why cant my son get those things, do we as hard working Americans not deserve that too?...

    I believe YOU are the President who will make these things happen. I have NEVER had this much belief in one person, and you are it.

    If this blog even makes it to your eyes…thank you. From the bottom of my heart.
    Yours Truly,

    A hard working Middle Class Law Abiding Citizen who is sick of getting fucked in the ass and would rather be grabbed by the pussy.


    Moreover, discussions of the Crumbley family in mainstream news media offer an example of how even the lethal and criminal behavior of individual white people is never presented as representative of white people as a group or whiteness as a social identity. If the Crumbleys were Black or brown or Muslim, or members of some other marginalized community, the dominant narrative would focus in on their "bad" or "neglectful" parenting with questions about "the family" and "fathers and male role models," "irresponsible mothers" and "the values of the larger community." Fox News and the larger right-wing echo chamber would have turned them into horrifying bogeymen, and focused on them for weeks.

    In his book "Dying of Whiteness," public health expert Jonathan Metzl explains the connections between whiteness, white identity politics, masculinity, guns, violence and death:

    The allure of this notion of armed white male power makes sense in many ways. Who wouldn't be tempted by a platform that claimed to increase one's privilege, power, safety, and authority? However, again, the math and the graphs suggest the dangerous, mortal underside of linking privilege so closely to instruments of warfare and of then supporting politicians and policies that all allow these instruments to be ever-more easily allowed into people's everyday lives and intimate spaces. The data overwhelmingly suggests that more guns mean more deaths, and particularly so for those very people whose privileges and potencies Man Cards and pro-guns policies claim to restore….

    As this process plays out, the peril to white men comes not just from the instrument, the impulse, or even the legislation. Rather, privilege itself becomes a liability. White men themselves become the biggest threats to … themselves. Danger emerges from who they are and from what they wish to be.

    American's public discourse does not create space for the kind of language that would be necessary to persuade white people that racism, white supremacy and white privilege are hurting them too. Indeed, as we see in the tragic gun massacre at Oxford High School and far too many similar incidents, white privilege is literally killing white people. For too many white people, this has become impossible to see: They value the psychological and material wages of whiteness — which are not dispensed equally among all white people — more than they value their own lives and those of their children, their families and their communities.
    Omicron and COVID boosters: everything you need to know

    December 13, 2021 

    The omicron variant of COVID is now spreading rapidly. Early reports suggest omicron causes less severe disease than other variants but it still poses a risk to the most vulnerable, with patients starting to arrive in hospitals.

    Omicron also appears to have some ability to get around existing immunity, whether from vaccination or infection. However, it seems less able to do this when people are boosted with a third vaccine dose.

    Because of this, booster programmes are being accelerated. Here’s which vaccines are being used and what effect boosters are likely to have.
    Which vaccines are used as boosters?

    Unless there are strong reasons not to use them (such as having had a severe allergic reaction or other side-effect previously), Pfizer or Moderna are the preferred options.

    These are the mRNA vaccines, which appear to be more effective as a booster dose compared to other COVID vaccines, such as AstraZeneca. The recent Cov-Boost study, which investigated which vaccine type performed best when given as a third dose, found the mRNA vaccines gave the highest uplift in antibodies.
    Following up the AstraZeneca vaccine with an mRNA dose enhances protection. 
    Marc Bruxelle/Shutterstock

    And if your first two vaccines don’t end up being the same as your booster, this is OK. Various studies (some awaiting review) have found that mixing doses is safe and leads to a strong immune response – even if you initially had the AstraZeneca vaccine.

    How much protection will I get?

    Even before the arrival of omicron, it was becoming clear that boosters were needed – data was showing vaccine protection declining after 90 days.

    Indeed, a preprint (a piece of research still to be reviewed) suggests that 20 weeks after their second jab, people over 65 were only 37% protected against symptomatic COVID if they had been given the AstraZeneca vaccine. If they had been given Pfizer, this figure was 55% (though the corresponding estimates for protection against hospitalisation were 76% and 91% respectively).

    There’s little hard data yet on omicron, but protection is likely to be lower still because of its mutations. Another preprint has tested antibodies in the blood of vaccinated people against the variant and found that they’re much less able to neutralise the virus.

    Early real-world data produced by the UK’s Health Security Agency seems to confirm that protection is lower. It suggests that vaccine effectiveness against omicron more than 25 weeks after a second vaccine dose was negligible for AstraZeneca and only about 35% with Pfizer. But after a booster, effectiveness was around 75%.

    This is against symptomatic disease. The risk of severe disease after an omicron infection is still not known, and neither is the effectiveness of a booster dose against severe disease.
    Early reports are that omicron causes less severe disease – but these findings need to be properly confirmed. True Touch Lifestyle/Shutterstock

    However, given that vaccines and boosters have shown greater effectiveness against severe disease than against infection with other variants, we should expect protection against severe illness to be much greater than 75%.

    Also, while omicron is heavily mutated, it doesn’t have so many mutations in areas targeted by specific immune cells called cytotoxic T cells, which are thought to be important in reducing disease severity. This is another reason why it’s not unrealistic to expect much greater protection against severe disease. But it will be a while before this is confirmed.
    Who is eligible in the UK?

    Instead of aiming to vaccinate everyone by the end of January, the new target is to offer every adult in England a third dose by the end of the year. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are also all speeding up their rollouts.

    Everyone in the UK over 18 – and everyone over 16 who is at risk, which includes those working in health and social care – is eligible. You just need to have had your second dose three months ago or more.

    However, some may have to wait depending on where they live. All over-18s in England can come forward for a booster, but in Scotland and Northern Ireland only over-30s are able to get one right now, though this is expected to change shortly. People in Wales need to wait to be called.

    Note that these booster doses are different from the third doses being offered to people with weakened immune systems, who may not have responded fully to their first two doses. People in this group only need to wait eight weeks from their second dose to book a third – and they’ll be eligible for an additional booster three months after this.
    How do I get one?

    People in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland can book online for a booster. They can also go to a walk-in clinic. However, there may be queues – and there’s always the chance that stocks on the day may run out.

    But with the recently announced new targets, it’s likely new vaccination centres will be opened – so check local news to see what’s available.
    Once boosted, am I free to enjoy Christmas?

    After you’ve had the booster, it takes a few days before the additional protection kicks in. A study in Israel found that protection starts to appear about seven days after the booster shot and then continues to increase for another week.

    So after your booster, you shouldn’t assume you have any increased protection for at least another week to ten days. You can still enjoy Christmas, but continue to be cautious – especially if you are, or have contact with, a vulnerable person.


    Author
    Paul Hunter
    Professor of Medicine, University of East Anglia
    Disclosure statement
    Paul Hunter consults for the World Health Organization (WHO). He receives funding from the UK National Institute for Health Research, the WHO and the European Regional Development Fund.
    University of East Anglia provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.


    Bird flu UK 2021 outbreak ‘largest ever’ as dozens of cases recorded in chickens and wild birds across country


    Half a million birds have been culled to stop the spread of avian flu, with UK chief vet ‘very concerned’ about scale of winter 2021 outbreak


    By Henry Sandercock
    Thursday, 9th December 2021, 2:25 pm



    Half a million birds have had to be culled to prevent the spread of bird flu (image: Shutterstock)

    Around half a million birds have had to be culled as the UK battles what has been called the “largest ever” outbreak of bird flu.

    Dozens of highly pathogenic avian flu cases have been recorded across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland despite the introduction of UK-wide prevention measures in November.

    It has ripped through poultry farms, wild bird populations of geese, ducks and swans, as well as a number of birds of prey.

    While bird flu’s risk to humans remains low, there have been warnings the virus could jump across if people come into close contact with infected birds.

    Concern over case numbers


    The UK’s chief veterinary officer Christine Middlemiss said there are 40 infected poultry farm premises in the UK - 33 in England, three in Wales, two in Scotland and two in Northern Ireland.

    These cases have been brought into the country by migratory birds which are flying south for the winter months from places like Russia and Eastern Europe.

    Bird flu outbreaks in the UK are not uncommon and tend to occur between autumn and spring, although the fact that they are occurring so early on in the migratory season has taken experts by surprise.
    Environment Secretary George Eustice described the 2021 bird flu outbreak as the “largest ever” in the UK (image: Getty Images)

    Dr Middlemiss told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme there was a “phenomenal level” of bird flu and that it had “huge human, animal and trade implications”.

    She said she was “very concerned” about bird flu, and that having 40 infected premises is “a really high number for the time of year”.

    The vet said around 500,000 birds have had to be culled.

    “I know that sounds a huge number, and of course for those keepers affected it’s really devastating.

    “But in terms of food supply impact it’s actually relatively a very small number in terms of egg supply, meat, chicken and so on.”

    According to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) figures, more than 1.1 billion chickens were killed for their meat in the UK in 2020.

    Speaking in the House of Commons, Environment Secretary George Eustice said: “Each year the UK faces a seasonal risk in incursion of avian influenza associated with migratory wild birds.

    “While we have that each year, I have to say this year we are now seeing the largest-ever outbreak in the UK.”

    ‘Bird lockdown’ needed until spring

    An Avian Influenza Prevention Zone, which requires farmers and birdkeepers to follow strict biosecurity standards, was declared across the UK on 3 November.

    This then became a nationwide housing order on 29 November - a measure that is essentially a lockdown for poultry and pets as they are stopped from going outside.

    It means that when you pick up British free range eggs or chicken in the supermarket, the animal might not actually have been reared that way.

    However, this shouldn’t apply to turkey products as most turkeys were killed and processed before the housing order was introduced.

    Dr Middlemiss said “we are going to need to keep up these levels of heightened biosecurity” until the spring.

    Defra has said the new housing measures will be kept under regular review.

    Advice for people with chickens or bird feeders

    People who keep chickens and want to feed wild birds need to make sure everything is kept “scrupulously clean” and “absolutely separate” to avoid infecting their own flocks, Dr Middlemiss advised.

    The risk to human health from bird flu remains very low, according to public health advice, and there is a low food safety risk.

    An RSPB spokesperson said: “Everyone should take care to maintain good hygiene when feeding garden birds, regularly cleaning feeders outside with mild disinfectant, removing old bird food, spacing out feeders as much as possible, and washing your hands.”



    INDIA
    Bird Flu in Kerala: 12,000 ducks were culled in Kerala’s Alappuzha district, restrictions imposed in affected areas

    By: FE Online |
    December 11, 2021 2:38 PM

    Use and sale of eggs, meat and manure of ducks, chickens, quails and domestic birds in the affected area has also been prohibited in the affected area.



    Last year too, the district reported the influenza outbreak but was contained for being localized in nature. (PTI Image)

    A total of 12,000 ducks were culled in ward number 10 of the Thakazhi gram panchayat in Kerala’s Alappuzha district after the state reported bird flu cases on Thursday. The culled birds were buried safely within a radius of one kilometre in the 10th ward of Thakazhi panchayat. The animal rearers will be compensated according to the government norms, animal husbandry minister J Cinchu Rani in the state capital said.

    The ward number 10 of the Thakazhi gram panchayat and the area has been declared as a containment zone, strict restrictions on movement on people and vehicles has been imposed. Use and sale of eggs, meat and manure of ducks, chickens, quails and domestic birds in the affected area has also been prohibited in the affected area.

    Alapuzha District Collector chaired an emergency meeting on Friday and decided to step up its measures to prevent the bird flu from spreading to other areas like Champakulam, Nedumudi, Muttar, Viyapuram, Karuvatta, Thrikkunnapuzha, Thakazhi, Purakkad, Ambalapuzha South, Ambalapuzha North, Edathva panchayats and Harippad Municipality areas where restrictions are applicable.

    While the Rapid Response Teams will be deployed in the affected areas and distribute preventive medicines to the people, the Department of Animal Welfare will ensure the service of Rapid Response Teams and bury the birds.

    The Assistant Forest Conservator on the other hand will monitor and examine whether the migrant birds in the affected areas were infected with the disease. The animal husbandry department has been asked to submit daily reports on bird flu prevention activities.

    The state animal husbandry department confirmed bird flu (H5N1) influenza) on Thursday after reports of some samples sent to the National Institute of High-Security Animal Disease in Bhopal turned in. A total 140 samples were sent for test and 26 samples tested positive for bird flu.

    Last year too, the district reported the influenza outbreak but was contained for being localized in nature. Bird Flu can spread to humans in rare conditions, and if it happens, it can trigger a person to person transmission, experts said.


    UK
    House of Fraser, Waterstones and Schuh among 208 firms named for breaching minimum wage rules

    Nineteen employers operating in Scotland have been identified by the UK Government.



    By Linda Howard
    Money and Consumer Writer
    9 DEC 2021
    The Buchanan Street store in Glasgow could be at risk (Image: Getty Images)

    House of Fraser, Schuh and Waterstones are among more than 200 employers across the country who broke minimum wage laws when paying staff, according to a new report from the UK Government.

    The businesses were named as among the 208 firms, including 19 in Scotland, that failed to pay around £1.2 million to their workers, breaking national minimum wage laws, leaving about 12,000 workers out of pocket, the UK Government said.

    Minister for Labour Markets Paul Scully, said: "We want workers to know that we're on their side and they must be treated fairly by their employers, which is why paying the legal minimum wage should be non-negotiable for businesses.”

    He continued: "Today's 208 businesses, whatever their size, should know better than to short-change hard-working employees, regardless of whether it was intentional or not.

    "With Christmas fast approaching, it's more important than ever that cash is not withheld from the pockets of workers. So don't be a scrooge - pay your staff properly."

    The most common problem among the named companies was that they deducted money from staff's wages to pay for expenses such as work uniforms.


    About 37 per cent of businesses fell into this trap.

    Meanwhile, 29 per cent did not pay for mandatory training, trial shifts or travel time, 16 per cent did not pay enough to apprentices, and 11 per cent did not increase what they paid staff when the minimum wage was hiked, or paid younger workers at the wrong rate.

    House of Fraser failed to pay over £16,000 to 354 workers, Schuh failed to pay £807 to 39 staff and Waterstones failed to pay nearly £8,700 to 58 staff.

    The current House of Fraser owner, Frasers Group, said that the claims come from before it bought House of Fraser in 2018.

    It said: "In short, these breaches are historic and relate to the activities of the old House of Fraser company that is now in administration and is nothing at all to do with any activities of the new House of Fraser business that is owned by Frasers Group."

    Low Pay Commission chair Bryan Sanderson said: "The minimum wage is a success story welcomed by employees and employers alike, but it only works if everyone without exception obeys the law.

    "We hope this latest naming round can continue to raise awareness of the most common mistakes businesses make and help protect low-paid workers from unfair treatment."

    Trades Union Congress general secretary Frances O'Grady said: "Every worker deserves fair pay for their work.

    "There's no excuse for not paying the minimum wage. Firms who cheat staff out of their hard-earned money deserve to be named and shamed.

    "We also need to see prosecutions and higher fines for the most serious offenders, especially those who deliberately flout the law. Minimum wage underpayment is still far too common in Britain."



    The Uk Government said it is determined to make work pay, having recently announced a significant rise to the National Living Wage from April 2022.

    This will lead to a pay rise for some of the lowest paid workers in the UK, with workers on the National Living Wage seeing a 6.6% increase to £9.50 an hour.

    This is the biggest increase to the National Living Wage since its introduction, which the UK Government says will keep it on track to achieve its manifesto commitment for the National Living Wage to equal two-thirds of median earnings by 2024.

    More details about the list can be found on the GOV.UK website here.

    Blackburn business shamed for failing to pay minimum wage

    By Sophie-May Clarke @smclarkey95
    Chief Reporter


    A BUSINESS in Blackburn with Darwen has been 'named and shamed' for failing to pay their lowest-paid staff minimum wage.

    Over 200 employers have been named by the government for failing to pay their lowest paid staff the minimum wage.

    The 208 employers were found to have failed to pay their workers £1.2 million in a clear breach of National Minimum Wage law, leaving around 12,000 workers out of pocket.

    Among them is Shabani Ltd, which failed to pay £3,606.19 to three workers.

    The company, which is registered as a take-away business, was based on Whalley New Road and was dissolved earlier this year.

    Companies being named range from multinational businesses and large high street names to small and medium enterprises and sole traders, in a clear message that no employer is exempt from paying their workers the statutory minimum wage.

    These businesses have since had to pay back what they owe to staff and also face significant financial penalties of up to 200 per cent of what was owed, which are paid to the government. The investigations by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs concluded between 2014 and 2019.


    Minister for Labour Markets Paul Scully said: ""We want workers to know that we're on their side and they must be treated fairly by their employers, which is why paying the legal minimum wage should be non-negotiable for businesses.

    "Today's 208 businesses, whatever their size, should know better than to short-change hard-working employees, regardless of whether it was intentional or not.

    "With Christmas fast approaching, it is more important than ever that cash is not withheld from the pockets of workers. So don't be a scrooge, pay your staff properly."
    Who else has been shamed?




    British pest control and hygiene firm Rentokil lines up ‘transformational’ $6.7bn deal to buy US rival Terminix

    • The cash-and-stock deal values Terminix at a 47% premium to Monday close
    • It is expected the deal will create the world leader in pest control and hygiene 
    • Rentokil shares are now trading lower having initially rallied as much as 6% 

    British pest control business Rentokil is set to buy US rival Terminix in a cash-and-stock deal worth $6.7billion (£5.1billion).

    The deal, which values Terminix at $55 a share, is set to create the world leader in pest control, hygiene and wellbeing, and the leader in pest control in North America.

    Analysts have praised the deal as ‘transformative’, but Rentokil Initial shares had moved 4.3 per cent lower by midmorning after initially rallying as much as 6 per cent when the market opened.

    The deal is expected to significantly improve Rentokil's growth prospects amid US expansion opportunities

    The deal is expected to significantly improve Rentokil's growth prospects amid US expansion opportunities 

    The deal will see Rentokil issue 643.29 million new shares to Terminix shareholders and around $1.3billion in cash. Rentokil has set up a debt facility for up to $2.7billion with Barclays to finance the cash component of the deal and refinance Terminix's debt.

    CEO Andy Ransom will maintain the helm of the enlarged group

    CEO Andy Ransom will maintain the helm of the enlarged group

    It represents a 47 per cent premium to Terminix’s share price at Monday's close, giving the US firm’s shareholders ownership of 26 per cent of the enlarged group.

    The enlarged group will serve about 4.9 million customers around the world from 790 locations and employ about 56,000 people.

    Rentokil expects the deal to generate cost savings of at least $150million by the third year after completion and add to its earnings in the first year.

    Rentokil's chairman Richard Solomons and chief executive Andy Ransom will hold those same roles in the combined group.

    The boards of both companies backed the deal, which is expected to close in the second half of 2022.

    Rentokil added that the enlarged business will have a ‘strong platform for growth’, particularly in North America, and an ‘attractive financial profile to support future growth, including through acquisitions and continued investment in innovation and technology’.

    Solomon said: ‘Under Andy Ransom's leadership, our Combined Group will have a highly talented and experienced management team able to more effectively create value and enhance long-term growth.

    ‘We believe the combination is a compelling opportunity for all stakeholders to participate in the value creation of the Combined Group.’

     Ransom added: ‘The combination will deliver further investment and the sharing of best practices to enable our talented teams to better serve customers, protecting them from the growing threat of pests and meeting their future needs.

    ‘We will open our first innovation centre in the US and provide our industry-leading innovations and digital technologies to a far larger customer base. This is a win-win-win for colleagues, customers and shareholders.’

    Despite this morning’s dip, Rentokil shares are up 16.7 per cent year-to-date to 604p.

    Analysts at Peel Hunt hailed the deal as a ‘transformational acquisition’ and maintained their ‘hold’ rating at a target price of 595p.