Tuesday, February 15, 2022

THE ARCTIC IS A GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY
US senators call for comprehensive Arctic strategy
‘It is imperative the Arctic receives the appropriate attention to promote American interests’


This March 28, 2009, photo shows Apex overlooking Frobisher Bay, Nunavut. 
(AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Nathan Denette, File)



Joaqlin Estus
Indian Country Today

Arctic Indigenous peoples – including Inuit, Inupiaq, Athabascan, Yup’ik, Chukchi and Sami – are resilient but will be increasingly challenged by climate change. That’s according to the United Nations Environmental Program. A group of U.S. senators is asking the Biden administration to step up its attention to Arctic affairs.

The University of Lapland Arctic Center estimates Indigenous peoples make up about 10 percent of the populations of the Arctic nations of Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Canada and the U.S. (Alaska). Greenland is 80 percent Inuit. Arctic and sub-Arctic communities in Alaska are 60 to 98 percent Inupiaq, Yup’ik, and Athabascan. Indigenous peoples of Alaska and in other countries depend on wildlife for subsistence.

However, the Arctic is heating up at four times the rate of the rest of the planet. The ocean is warming, impacting fish and marine mammals. Wildlife is threatened by higher temperatures and habitat destruction. And infrastructure is being put at risk due to melting permafrost. Melting sea ice is opening the door to increased fishing and to development of minerals, including oil and gas, in Arctic waters.

The value of those resources has caught the attention of Russia and China. Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping last week announced plans to strengthen and continue their strategic partnership on resource development in the Arctic. Russia for several years has been building military ports and facilities on its Arctic coast, and has invested in dozens of icebreakers. The United States, meanwhile, has only one icebreaker, which is perhaps symbolic of its relative inattention to the Arctic.

Monday, 13 bipartisan senators asked the Biden administration to elevate Arctic affairs. In the letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the senators said the state department needs to take a stronger role in diplomacy, internal organization, and to develop a comprehensive Arctic strategy. The letter was signed by six Democrats, six Republicans and one Independent.

“It is imperative the Arctic receives the appropriate attention to promote American interests in a world where we compete for ideas, resources, and relationships,” the senators stated.

They asked that the state department’s lead person for the Arctic be promoted from the position of Arctic coordinator to ambassador level or higher, saying, “The U.S. is the only Arctic nation without a dedicated ambassador to the region. While we know other nations will always hear our perspective because of our international standing, it is important to demonstrate the sincerity our government holds in its engagement by ensuring the position is given a title commensurate with its responsibilities.”


The senators called the State department’s approach to Arctic affairs “disjointed,” and criticized communication across bureaus in the department.

They said the department has no comprehensive strategic plan, unlike the military.

“The Department of Defense (DOD) recently established a deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Arctic Affairs and Global Resilience. DOD released an Arctic Strategy in 2019 and each military service branch has subsequently released their own Arctic strategies. We understand no such strategic document exists for the Department of State. As the lead agency in international affairs, we ask that you ensure the Arctic receives the attention required of our nation’s leading agency,” said the senators.

The senators asked Blinken to report to them on “1) the future of the Arctic Coordinator position, 2) the status of a comprehensive and holistic Arctic strategy for the Department, and 3) how the Secretary is aligning or redistributing assets, resources, and personnel within the Department to address issues identified in a recent Inspector General’s report.”

The letter was signed by Senate Arctic Caucus co-chairs Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Angus King (I-ME), as well as Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Chris Coons (D-DE), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Susan Collins (R-ME), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Kevin Cramer (R-ND).




BY JOAQLIN ESTUS
Tlingit, is a national correspondent for Indian Country Today. Based in Anchorage, Alaska, she is a longtime journalist. Follow her on Twitter @estus_m or email her at jestus@indiancountrytoday.com.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Falsified test results for US submarine steel land metallurgist in prison

A woman is convicted of fraud for falsifying test results for high-strength steel used in US Navy subs
Falsified test results for US submarine steel land metallurgist in prison











An American metallurgist who fraudulently altered the results of strength tests on steel used to make US Navy submarine hulls has been sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison for what a federal judge called “a crime of pride and ego.”

US District Court Judge Benjamin Settle sentenced 67-year-old Elaine Thomas on Monday in Tacoma, Washington, noting that even after an exhaustive Navy investigation, “we don’t know the full ramifications of this fraud.” Prosecutor Nick Brown said Thomas betrayed the Navy’s trust for 32 years, “knowingly placing its sailors and military operations at risk.”

Thomas, formerly lab director for military steel supplier Bradken Inc., was accused of allowing inferior steel to be used on Navy subs on half the orders she reviewed. She reportedly told investigators that she believed a test in which steel was cooled to minus 100 degrees Fahrenheit and struck with a pendulum was “stupid” because subs don’t operate in such temperatures. She allegedly falsified about 240 tests, altering failing scores to passing, over a period of more than three decades.

Settle called the case “baffling,” saying, “It seems this was a crime of pride and ego, that in some way she knew better than those who set the standards.”

A lawyer for the metallurgist argued that she’s “a good person who let a number of work pressures cause her to make bad decisions.” Those pressures included sexism in a male-dominated work environment, said the lawyer, John Carpenter. Thomas was reportedly the first woman to earn a metallurgy degree from Washington State University and won a prestigious industry award.

Her falsifications of test results first came to light in 2017, and the Navy incurred $14 million in costs to examine whether its submarine hulls are safe. Additional monitoring of the 30 hulls with steel tested by Thomas will be required indefinitely.

Bradken fired Thomas after discovering the false test results. It also notified investigators of testing discrepancies, but the defense contractor failed to immediately disclose that the falsified data stemmed from fraud. The company reached a civil settlement with the federal government, agreeing to pay $10.9 million.

Submarine steel is required to meet exacting standards to ensure that hulls hold up in extreme conditions and “wartime scenarios,” prosecutors said. Subs also face risks of collisions, such as when the USS Connecticut struck an undersea mountain in the South China Sea last October, injuring 12 crew members. A similar incident occurred in 2005, killing one sailor and leaving most of the other 136 crew members injured.

 

Canada wins record-breaking semifinal, U.S. beats Finland in women's ice hockey

(Xinhua09:03, February 15, 2022

BEIJING, Feb. 14 (Xinhua) -- Ice hockey powerhouse Canada overwhelmed Switzerland 10-3 in the women's ice hockey semifinal of Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games on Monday, breaking their own Olympic scoring record.

The United States fended off Finland 4-1 to book the other final berth.

Canada used a little more than 10 minutes to get a 5-0 lead. Erin Ambrose scored the team's fifth goal in the match and 49th goal in the tournament, which means Canada broke the 48-goal record for women's ice hockey in a single Winter Olympics. The previous record was set by Canada at Vancouver 2010.

It was heading for a thrashing until Switzerland pulled one back thanks to the goal from captain Lara Stalder in the 19th minute of the first period.

The second period started with another goal for the Swiss. Alina Muller shot the puck into the net during a fast break to close the gap at 5-2.

Both teams fought hard on both sides, and the second period ended with Canada leading 8-3.

The final period finished with another two goals from Canada, and the four-time Olympic champion got the easy victory by a seven-goal margin.

"I think a lot of the credit is for our coach, Troy [Ryan]," said Canadian forward Brianne Jenner about the 54 goals so far on the tournament. "I think he's given us some great systems that allow us to be creative."

Canada managed to get into the finals of all the seven Winter Games since 1998 when women's ice hockey was included in the Olympic program for the first time.

"It's not easy to get to this point," said Jenner. "It's been building and building and building for years."

Canada has won four Olympic golds and two silvers, and they will seek to avenge the final defeat to the United States four years ago in PyeongChang.

The other semifinal turned out to be a much tougher one. The U.S. out-shot Finland 12-6 in the first period, but couldn't open the scoring.

The second period saw a more aggressive U.S. team. The defending champion led 2-0 thanks to goals from Cayla Barnes and Hilary Knight.

Finland struggled hard to fight back, but the U.S. played solid defense to wrap up the victory 4-1.

The women's ice hockey final will take place on Thursday.

Canada has a 3-2 head-to-head record against the U.S. in their five encounters in the Olympic final of the previous six Games. Four years ago, the U.S. beat Canada 3-2 through shoot-off to win the gold medal. 

(Web editor: Peng Yukai, Liang Jun)

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M BANK ROBBERS

Morgan Stanley Among Block-Trading Firms Facing U.S. Probe

(Bloomberg) -- U.S. authorities are scrutinizing how Wall Street firms including Morgan Stanley handle block trades, as part of a long-running probe into stock transactions typically big enough to move markets, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter.

The behind-the-scenes inquiry has been looking into how banks execute the trades with help from outside market makers, the people said. The Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating in 2018, and after initial inquiries and what appeared to some outsiders as a lull in the case, officials sought more information, with the Justice Department opening its own probe, the people said. It’s unclear what evidence prompted the additional inquiry.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. also has received requests for documents, the Wall Street Journal noted in a report on the probe earlier Monday. 

Spokespeople for the SEC, Justice Department, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs declined to comment. The opening of investigations does not mean charges will necessarily follow. While multiple firms have received inquiries, it’s not clear which, if any of them, may be suspected of wrongdoing.

Investment banks typically spearhead block trades. The firms acquire a slug of stock from an investor -- such as hedge funds, private equity firms or venture capital firms -- at a discount, before parceling the shares out discreetly to buyers. The aim is to price the blocks at a slim premium, and to avoid sending a stock’s price into a dive before the transaction is completed, which can inflict losses.

Banks have long strived to keep a lid on the unregistered stock offerings, typically negotiating them outside of market hours to reduce the potential for stocks to drop while arrangements are being made. 

Yet price declines before the trades have raised concerns for years that some investors may be abusing access to confidential information.

Some funds that have received subpoenas from the government serve as banks’ “liquidity providers” for the deals, ready to buy up blocks, including those that have few interested buyers, the Journal reported, citing unidentified people with knowledge of the matter.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

US consumers are becoming less fearful that higher inflation readings will continue

Inflation in America is running at its fastest pace since 1982 and the Federal Reserve is set to raise interest rates

The Federal Reserve’s Eccles Building in Washington DC. Photograph: Reuters

Alex Tanzi
February 15 2022 

US consumers don’t expect red-hot inflation levels to last in the long term.

That’s the takeaway from the January consumer survey from Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which showed that the median one-year-ahead inflation expectations fell for the first time since October 2020, to 5.8pc.

The outlook over three years dropped even more sharply, and the decline was broad-based across age, education and income.

In a separate analysis of data from the survey and from the University of Michigan’s sentiment index, New York Fed economists concluded that consumers seem to recognize the unusual nature of the current bout of high inflation.

“This result suggests that while consumers are highly attuned to current inflation news in updating their short-term inflation expectations, they are taking less signal than before the pandemic from the recent sharp movements in realised inflation when revising their three-year-ahead expectations,” the economists said in a blog post.

All products and services surveyed by the New York Fed declined in January, including the year-ahead price changes for food, rent, gas, medical care, college education and gold.

The survey also showed that the median households is expecting one-year-ahead earnings growth to rise by 3pc, the same as last month. Last year, an average gain of 2.6pc was expected.

The US central bank’s next policy meeting is set for March 15-16, and some economists are calling on the Federal Reserve to make an aggressive, half-point increase so as to signal its determination to contain inf lation which has risen at its fastest pace since 1982

Rising Wages Could Not Keep Pace With Rising Prices In Arizona In 2021

By Emily Sacia

WASHINGTON – Wages rose 5.3% in the Phoenix metro area last year, but prices rose almost twice as fast, with rising fuel and food prices eroding workers’ buying power despite a surging economy.

The situation in Arizona mirrored the U.S., where an average 5% increase in salary and wages was outstripped by a 7% rise in the consumer price index. But the increases in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale area were bigger in both instances, and the gap between income and price growth was wider, with the Valley seeing a 9.7% rise in the cost of goods and services.

“People can’t buy as much with the given amount of income once prices have risen,” despite the increase in wages, said George Hammond, director of the Economic and Business Research Center at the University of Arizona. “And that’s a bad thing, there’s no getting around that.”

The Bureau of Labor Statistics said the 7% rise in consumer prices nationally from December 2020 to December 2021 was the highest in 40 years. Increases came across the board, with prices going up on everything from food to housing to clothing. The biggest increases came in the price of home fuel, used cars and gasoline, which was up 49% nationwide for the year.

Against those increases, the bureau also reported rising wages, with the biggest gains being made in industries hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, including those working in nursing and residential care facilities, and transportation and material moving.

Jobs in the leisure and hospitality industries led the way, with wages increasing an average of 8.9% nationally over the year. In that category, accommodation and food services workers saw their pay rise 9.3%.

Salary breakdown was not available at the state level, but experts say Arizona likely saw increased pay in hospitality and health care jobs, two important parts of the state’s economy.

Dennis Hoffman, director of the Seidman Research Institute and professor of economics at Arizona State University, said hospitality industry workers were overdue for a pay raise. But that, along with ongoing supply chain problems, are contributing to the rise in prices.

“Low-skilled jobs have been underpaid for years and it’s time it got fixed,” Hoffman said. “So along with that is going to come some temporary inflation as we adjust those wages up.”

Garrick Taylor, spokesperson for the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said the surge in demand for products as the coronavirus pandemic eased has been met by a labor shortage and supply chain disruptions that suppressed supply of those goods. That fuels inflation.

“Wage growth in Arizona is ahead of the national average,” Taylor said. “But it is still lagging the record high inflation rates.”

But workers are not the only ones feeling the pain of inflation, he said.

“Employers are often in the position of playing catch up when it comes to inflation, but employers are also not immune to inflation,” Taylor said. “The inputs that they need, for example in manufacturing, are also increasing in price.”

Taylor said there are some moves the Biden administration “might be able to do around the edges” to ease inflation on items like gasoline, but nothing consumers will likely see immediately. He said the biggest challenge will be to “break through these supply chain disruptions that are putting upward pressure on prices.”

“The Biden administration should resist the calls from some corners to flood the economy once again with more stimulus dollars, that would only exacerbate this issue of too many dollars chasing too few goods,” Taylor said.

Hammond said part of the problem is a surge in demand driven by “huge amounts of federal income support” during the depths of the pandemic. He said consumers grappling with inflation can wait for price increases to slow, but that is not always an option when it comes to goods and services like gasoline, transportation and housing.

“People will – where they can – hold off on buying certain goods. They will wait for price increases to stop or slow down or actually for prices to come back down,” Hammond said.

Hammond thinks the current inflation is a short-term phenomenon. But when it ends depends on a number of factors.

“Nobody knows” when inflation may cool, he said. “It depends on how fast the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, it depends on how fast the supply chain disruptions are really alleviated, it depends on the pandemic, it depends on the labor market.”

Hoffman agreed that the current imbalance between wage and price increases is not likely to be a long-term problem.

“I think we are going to see by the year end, that the rate of inflation year-over-year will migrate down,” Hoffman said. “And that will bring those price increases back in line with wage increases.”




'A line of fire': Argentina blaze burns 500,000 hectares amid drought


BUENOS AIRES (Reuters) - A devastating wildfire in the northern Argentine province of Corrientes has spread to cover more than 500,000 hectares, 6% of the region's total area, underscoring the impact of dry weather due to the Niña weather pattern in the South American nation.


© Reuters/REWILDING ARGENTINACharred land is seen following a wildfire, in Cambyreta

A Civil Defense source told Reuters that firefighters were working to bring the fire under control, with houses and a hotel near the provincial capital located about 800 kilometers (497 miles) north of Buenos Aires being evacuated as a precaution.

"The fires are advancing by leaps and bounds and have already burned tens of thousands of hectares, turning the fields into a line of fire that is almost impossible to control," the Agricultural Entities Liaison Commission said in a statement.

Corrientes produces farm products including citrus fruits, rice, tobacco, yerba mate, cotton, livestock and forestry.

"There are almost 518,000 hectares on fire," Nicolas Pino, president of the Rural Society of Corrientes, told a local television channel, adding that the hope was for strong rains to douse the blaze.

"The fields will eventually recover, at some point it will rain heavily and this disaster will stop, but it really brings the problem to the forefront."

The National Meteorological Service is forecasting scant rain for the next few days with only 5-10 millimeters expected.

Argentina is in the midst of a second consecutive La Niña, a weather event that typically brings less rainfall to its central agricultural regions, which are key to the country's exports and foreign currency revenues.

(Reporting by Walter Bianchi; Additional reporting by Maximilian Heath; Editing by Alistair Bell)
US Senate passes bill to make former internment camp national historic site

BY OLAFIMIHAN OSHIN - 02/14/22

The Senate on Monday passed a bill to make a former Japanese American internment camp in Colorado a national historic site.

The bill would establish the Amache National Historic Site, a former Japanese American incarceration facility located outside Granada, in southeast Colorado, as part of the national park system. The legislation last year passed the House and was shepherded by Colorado Reps. Joe Neguse (D) and Ken Buck (R).

Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet (D) and John Hickenlooper (D) celebrated the bill's passage of the Senate.

“The incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II at sites like Amache is a shameful part of our country’s history. Our bill will preserve Amache’s story to ensure future generations can learn from this dark chapter in our history," Bennet said.

Camp Amache was one of several Japanese American incarceration facilities across the country during World War II.

The bill's passage comes just before the 80th anniversary of the executive order that led to the forced internment of 120,000 Japanese Americans on Feb. 19, 1942.

“The Amache site as a National Park unit highlights the injustices of the internment of Japanese Americans, one of our nation’s darkest chapters,” Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) said in a statement. “Colorado is home to world-class national parks and adding the Amache site honors those values and our history.”



Temporary layoffs extended at US Ford auto plants, expand to other automakers


Ford announced that it was extending temporary layoffs for workers at several of its US plants last Friday. Production was cut and many workers placed on temporary layoff (TLO) in the last week due to shortages of semiconductor chips and other parts, according to company labor relations memos.

At Ford Chicago Assembly Plant, all Temporary Full-Time (TFT) and many B Crew Seniority workers across departments will be on TLO through February 20. A robocall script posted on the UAW Local 551 Communications Facebook page stated to workers, “If you are on TLO the entire week of pay end February 20, 2022 you will need to file a claim for unemployment.”

Ford Chicago Assembly (WSWS)

TLOs were announced and posted at the Ford Kansas City Assembly Plant in Claycomo, Missouri on Friday. Truck A crew and all truck side TFTs are laid off through at least February 20.

Workers themselves must file for their own unemployment benefits and cannot do so until after their claim has been activated by Ford. The lengthy process of securing unemployment benefits through antiquated and backlogged state systems leaves most laid-off workers in a financial lurch and unable to pay necessary bills on time. Workers find themselves waiting up to six weeks to receive any money.

Workers receive no real support in navigating unemployment from the United Auto Workers, which has helped the companies offset lengthy shutdowns through brutal levels of overtime, particularly at the most profitable plants. For this reason some workers have chosen to find supplemental jobs, further exhausting them, or have left for other employment altogether, exacerbating the problems of the production cycle.

“We’re going back to work next week for A crew and C crew only,” An A crew worker at Ford Chicago Assembly Plant told the World Socialist Web Site on Friday. “The week after that I heard A and C crew will be laid off again and that B crew will work that week. We will work a week and then be off for a week. And we don’t know how long they will be doing that, so it doesn’t look good for us right now.

“Unemployment is all messed up. The state of Illinois put in a new system called Okta and it’s a real problem. So now we have to sign into Okta, then sign into the state of Illinois just to file a claim. It will be about five weeks before we get any money for this week. And if we get laid off again, that will add to the wait. The unemployment office called us back three or four times per day, but hung up on us every time. It was very crazy just to get to file a claim.

“Of course the union people get to work and don’t have to go through all the BS to get paid. Ford and UAW people don’t care about the members getting paid, and then they get mad at you when you call them for help. But hey, Ford made 18 billion dollars last year and the CEO will get his 30 million dollars. Ford and UAW really don’t care about the people who really do all the work. There is really no appreciation for the workers.”

Ford made this announcement as several other US automakers announced that they would be shutting production lines at plants around the country. The automakers cited blockades of far-right activists at key border checkpoints between the US and Canada as the immediate reason for the disruption of parts supply chains.

This has disrupted the flow of critical parts from Canadian to US auto plants, such as engines built at Ford’s Windsor engine plant which are used in SuperDuty pickup trucks assembled in Louisville, Kentucky and Avon Lake, Ohio. Avon Lake sent workers home and announced production shutdowns for this week. Workers were sent home from Avon Lake Friday due to the far right blockade, but the company attributes the production shutdown this week to the global semiconductor chip shortage, according to FOX8 News.

Other automakers curtailed production in the past week, with many citing the blockades at the US-Canada border as the immediate cause. Toyota announced its production had been disrupted at its Georgetown, Kentucky assembly plant. General Motors cited parts shortages as the cause of a production shutdown at its Lansing, Michigan plant, and has begun to fly parts over the border on airplanes to avoid the blockades, according to NBC News.

However, other factors are also in play in the ongoing supply chain crisis, which has gone on for a year. Chief among these is the massive spread of COVID-19 inside the auto plants, which has led to hundreds of workers quarantining at any given time at individual plants. At Stellantis’ Warren Truck plant, management has attempted to offset the impact of these absences by working Supplementals for 72 hours a week.

For the past two years, the corporations and their business partners in the unions have refused to shut down production to prevent mass infection and death due to COVID. That production has only ever shut down due to shortages demonstrates that, as far as they are concerned, workers’ lives are more replaceable than microchips or axles.

A Ford worker from Kansas City explained the conditions at the plant that have led to worker turnover and production problems. “People are not coming to work. Some are sick and some are fed up with these conditions. This is hard physical labor. You stand in one spot and your hands and arms swell up, and then on top of it you’re treated like dirt.

“The younger people won’t take it. They see how they’re treated, they get sick, and they quit. Some take their break and they don’t come back. They hired hundreds of TPTs around the end of last year but they still can’t cover shifts because so many quit that they can’t rehire them fast enough.

“You could have a whole line or department short on people because they’re out for COVID and so they have to move people from one department to work in another department just to keep the line running.”

“They’re keeping things more and more secretive,” he said about the UAW and company hiding information from workers on who was sick or who had died in the plant. “It’s amazing how they feel about human life—it’s horrible.”

Toyota’s North America Plant Disruptions Drag Into Second Week

(Bloomberg) -- Toyota Motor Corp. is seeing continued disruption to its North America operations after protests closed off the Ambassador Bridge linking the U.S. and Canada, hurting production at several of the automaker’s plants in the region last week. 

Toyota plants in Ontario, which were idled last week, are likely to continue to be affected this week, a company spokeswoman said. Output will also continue to be curtailed at factories in Alabama, Kentucky and West Virginia due to impacts including weather and supply issues, the spokeswoman said.

Three of Toyota’s plants in Ontario remain shuttered, a Toyota spokeswoman said Monday. Output has also been curtailed at factories in Alabama, Kentucky and West Virginia. The disruptions are expected to continue this week, the spokeswoman said.

The North American disruptions come on top of chip shortages and interruptions to Toyota’s operations due to the spread of the highly contagious omicron variant in both Japan and China. 

Toyota, which has been seeking to ramp up production to meet soaring levels of demand, has remained relatively resilient through the supply chain disruptions that have shaken the industry the past two years. Its sturdy supply chain and inventory management systems helped it finish both 2020 and 2021 as the world’s top-selling automaker. 

Last week, the automaker cut its output goal for the fiscal year ending March 31 to 8.5 million vehicles from a previous goal of 9 million units. 

Separately, the automaker announced Monday it’s seeking to produce 950,000 vehicles in March, up significantly from the 843,393 units it assembled over the same period a year earlier. Toyota cut its production target for next month by around 100,000 vehicles from an earlier target due to chip shortages. 

In addition to the semiconductor dearth persisting globally, many other bottlenecks are surfacing in the supply chain, Jefferies analyst Takaki Nakanishi wrote in a Feb. 9 note. 

“Toyota’s output recovery undoubtedly has been relatively fast and stable in a difficult environment,” Nakanishi wrote. However “it is apparent, amid widening bottlenecks, that even Toyota is finding it tougher to markedly outpace the industry.”

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.


Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track

The latest alarmist claims about spying on Trump appeared to be flawed, but the explanation is byzantine — underlining the challenge for journalists in deciding what merits coverage.


The special counsel John H. Durham was tasked in 2019 with discovering any wrongdoing by those investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. Credit...Bob Child/Associated Press

By Charlie Savage
Feb. 14, 2022

WASHINGTON — When John H. Durham, the Trump-era special counsel investigating the inquiry into Russia’s 2016 election interference, filed a pretrial motion on Friday night, he slipped in a few extra sentences that set off a furor among right-wing outlets about purported spying on former President Donald J. Trump.

But the entire narrative appeared to be mostly wrong or old news — the latest example of the challenge created by a barrage of similar conspiracy theories from Mr. Trump and his allies.

Upon close inspection, these narratives are often based on a misleading presentation of the facts or outright misinformation. They also tend to involve dense and obscure issues, so dissecting them requires asking readers to expend significant mental energy and time — raising the question of whether news outlets should even cover such claims. Yet Trump allies portray the news media as engaged in a cover-up if they don’t.

The latest example began with the motion Mr. Durham filed in a case he has brought against Michael A. Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer with links to the Democratic Party. The prosecutor has accused Mr. Sussmann of lying during a September 2016 meeting with an F.B.I. official about Mr. Trump’s possible links to Russia.

The filing was ostensibly about potential conflicts of interest. But it also recounted a meeting at which Mr. Sussmann had presented other suspicions to the government. In February 2017, Mr. Sussmann told the C.I.A. about odd internet data suggesting that someone using a Russian-made smartphone may have been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.

Mr. Sussmann had obtained that information from a client, a technology executive named Rodney Joffe. Another paragraph in the court filing said that Mr. Joffe’s company, Neustar, had helped maintain internet-related servers for the White House, and that he and his associates “exploited this arrangement” by mining certain records to gather derogatory information about Mr. Trump.

Citing this filing, Fox News inaccurately declared that Mr. Durham had said he had evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid a technology company to “infiltrate” a White House server. The Washington Examiner claimed that this all meant there had been spying on Mr. Trump’s White House office. And when mainstream publications held back, Mr. Trump and his allies began shaming the news media.

“The press refuses to even mention the major crime that took place,” Mr. Trump said in a statement on Monday. “This in itself is a scandal, the fact that a story so big, so powerful and so important for the future of our nation is getting zero coverage from LameStream, is being talked about all over the world.”

There were many problems with all this. For one, much of this was not new: The New York Times had reported in October what Mr. Sussmann had told the C.I.A. about data suggesting that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.

The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.

Sign Up for On Politics A guide to the political news cycle, cutting through the spin and delivering clarity from the chaos. Get it in your inbox.

“What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, both lawyers for Mr. Dagon. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing,” he was apolitical, did not work for any political party, and had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — including from the White House — for the purpose of hunting for security breaches or threats.

After Russians hacked networks for the White House and Democrats in 2015 and 2016, it went on, the cybersecurity researchers were “deeply concerned” to find data suggesting Russian-made YotaPhones were in proximity to the Trump campaign and the White House, so “prepared a report of their findings, which was subsequently shared with the C.I.A.”

A spokesman for Mr. Durham declined to comment.

Mr. Durham was assigned by the attorney general at the time, William P. Barr, to scour the Russia investigation for wrongdoing in May 2019 as Mr. Trump escalated his claims that he was the victim of a “deep state” conspiracy. But after nearly three years, he has not developed any cases against high-level government officials.

Instead, Mr. Durham has developed two cases against people associated with outside efforts to understand Russia’s election interference that put forward unproven, and sometimes thin or subsequently disproved, suspicions about purported links to Mr. Trump or his campaign.

Both cases are narrow — accusations of making false statements. One of those cases is against Mr. Sussmann, whom Mr. Durham has accused of lying during a September 2016 meeting with an F.B.I. official about Mr. Trump’s possible links to Russia.

(Mr. Durham says Mr. Sussmann falsely said he had no clients, but was there on behalf of both the Clinton campaign and Mr. Joffe. Mr. Sussman denies ever saying that, while maintaining he was only there on behalf of Mr. Joffe — not the campaign.)

Both Mr. Sussmann’s September 2016 meeting with the F.B.I. and the February 2017 meeting with the C.I.A. centered upon suspicions developed by cybersecurity researchers who specialize in sifting DNS data in search of hacking, botnets and other threats.

A military research organization had asked Georgia Tech researchers to help scrutinize a 2015 Russian malware attack on the White House’s network. After it emerged that Russia had hacked Democrats, they began hunting for signs of other Russian activity targeting people or organizations related to the election, using data provided by Neustar.

Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with the F.B.I. involved odd data the researchers said might indicate communications between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, a Kremlin-linked institution. The F.B.I. dismissed suspicions of a secret communications channel as unfounded. In the indictment of Mr. Sussmann, Mr. Durham insinuated that the researchers did not believe what they were saying. But lawyers for the researchers said that was false and that their clients believed their analysis.

The meeting with the C.I.A. involved odd data the researchers said indicated there had been communications with Yota servers in Russia coming from networks serving the White House; Trump Tower; Mr. Trump’s Central Park West apartment building; and Spectrum Health, a Michigan hospital company that also played a role in the Alfa Bank matter. The researchers also collaborated on that issue, according to Ms. Westby and Mr. Rasch, and Mr. Dagon had prepared a “white paper” explaining the analysis, which Mr. Sussmann later took to the C.I.A.

Mr. Durham’s filing also cast doubt on the researchers’ suggestion that interactions between devices in the United States and Yota servers were inherently suspicious, saying that there were more than three million such DNS logs from 2014 to 2017 — and that such logs from the White House dated back at least that long.

But Ms. Westby and Mr. Rasch reiterated that YotaPhones are extremely rare in the United States and portrayed three million DNS logs over three years as “paltry and small relative to the billions and billions” of logs associated with common devices like iPhones.

“Yota lookups are extremely concerning if they emanate from sensitive networks that require protection, such as government networks or people running for federal office,” they said.

Commentary: U.S. daylight robbery of Afghan assets tantamount to silent massacre

By Zheng Xin, Shi Xiantao (Xinhua10:46, February 15, 2022

KABUL, Feb. 15 (Xinhua) -- Washington's latest decision to divert billions of dollars in frozen Afghan assets to the families of 9/11 victims is rubbing salt into the wounds of millions of suffering Afghan people.

Couching the theft as "aid" in a self-righteous statement, the White House claimed the haul is "to be used to benefit the Afghan people," and that the United States is "committed to supporting the Afghan people" and continues to "consider all options available to us to achieve that goal."

And even though the people of Afghanistan had nothing to do with the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, Washington decided to withhold half of the roughly 7-billion-U.S. dollars in assets from Da Afghanistan Bank (DAB) for alleged compensation for U.S. victims.

Following its troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021, the United States has frozen more than 9 billion dollars of DAB assets. The move is widely seen as the primary factor leading to the current economic crisis and humanitarian disaster in the war-torn Asian country of some 39 million people.

Mohammad Naeem, a spokesperson of the Taliban political office in Qatar, tweeted that "stealing the blocked funds of Afghan nation by the United States and its seizure is indicative of the lowest level of human and moral decay of a country and a nation."

The world's wealthiest superpower is stealing from the pockets of a poor country, repeating a history of theft that has trampled on legal, moral and humanistic principles.

In the military campaign that lasted 20 years, more than 30,000 civilians in Afghanistan were killed by U.S. forces or have died due to U.S.-led warfare, and some 11 million people have been displaced.

The day before the evacuation from Afghanistan, a U.S. drone strike on a Kabul home in August 2021 killed 10 civilians, including seven children.

The people of Afghanistan, who have been devastated and separated from their loved ones and their families, cannot hold the U.S. military accountable, let alone receive compensation.

As Afghan political analyst Nazari Pariani noted, in the so-called "war on terror" led by the United States, not only were a colossal number of Afghan civilians killed, the number of Afghanistan's terrorist organizations increased from a single-digit number to more than 20 during the U.S. military presence. Instead of uprooting terrorism, the United States had been fanning it.

A report released in August 2021 by the U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction said that the United States had invested 145 billion dollars in Afghanistan's reconstruction. But after 20 years, Afghanistan is left with a depleted economy, crumbling infrastructure, backward industry and a worsening crisis.

Before the troop withdrawal in 2021, statistics showed that 72 percent of the Afghan population lived below the poverty line, unemployment was 38 percent and 3.5 million children were out of school.

The reason why the United States had so little success in rebuilding Afghanistan is simple: the funds deployed were not used to improve the livelihoods of the Afghan people. According to a New York Times report, about 12 percent of U.S. reconstruction aid to Afghanistan between 2002 and 2021 had gone to the Afghan government, with most of the rest going into the pockets of U.S. companies.

Afghanistan is facing "an avalanche of hunger and poverty." The latest statistics from the United Nations World Food Program show that 22.8 million Afghans face acute food insecurity, and many families can not survive.

From casualties and inflicting trauma to fanning terrorism and looting the country's assets, Washington seems utterly oblivious to the suffering of the Afghan people, taking on a "moral high ground" and once again plundering the starving Afghan people of live-saving cash without a tinge of guilt.

It is the latest episode in yet another season of the U.S. wrecking havoc on Afghanistan, a tragedy that is truly a silent massacre. 

(Web editor: Peng Yukai, Liang Jun)