It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Connecticut House votes to expand state’s paid sick leave requirement for all employers by 2027
Connecticut state Rep. Manny Sanchez debates a bill in the House of Representatives chamber that would expand the state’s current paid sick leave law, Wednesday, April 24, 2024 in Hartford, Conn. The bill would eventually require all employers to provide time off by 2027. (AP Photo/Susan Haigh)
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut’s first-in-the-nation paid sick leave law from 2011 moved closer Wednesday to being updated, requiring all employers, down to those with a single worker, to provide their employees with time off by 2027.
Cheers were heard from the House of Representatives gallery after lawmakers voted 88-61 in favor of legislation that attempts to provide guaranteed time off to people left out of the old law, including many low-wage and part-time workers across the state. The bill is expected to clear the Senate in the coming days.
Both chambers are controlled by Democrats.
While Republicans argued the bill will be a burden for small businesses, proponents said the proposed expansion is common sense, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic.
“We’ve experienced quite a culture change since 2011, and that’s especially true even more since we experienced the pandemic,” said Democratic House Majority Leader Jason Rojas, who said people no longer want themselves or a coworker to go into work sick. “People shouldn’t have to choose between being sick, making other people sick, and losing out on compensation.”
If the bill is ultimately signed by Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont, as expected, Connecticut will join Washington, D.C., Arizona, California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Vermont and Washington in requiring paid sick leave for any business with one or more employees.
Republican House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora said that would be a mistake. He and other GOP lawmakers argued the bill will create a financial and bureaucratic hardship for small business owners and break the state’s recent cycle of economic growth.
Connecticut’s current paid sick law generally requires certain employers with at least 50 employees to provide up to 40 hours of paid sick leave annually to “service workers” in certain specified occupations. This bill applies to all employees and affects employers with 25 or more workers beginning Jan. 1, 2025; 11 or more workers beginning Jan. 1, 2026; and one or more workers beginning Jan. 1, 2027.
An employee would accrue one hour of paid sick leave for each 30 hours worked, for a maximum of 40 hours of paid leave per year.
“We are now taking a giant leap and going to have a broad-brush impact every business throughout the entire state of Connecticut — and I don’t think people here appreciate or understand how it’s going to affect them,” Candelora said.
The bill, the result of months of negotiations to ultimately get a proposal that could clear the House, was also criticized for being too lenient and not requiring workers to provide their employer with a doctor’s note.
“This could be for somebody to take a day off and go to the beach,” said Republican Rep. Steve Weir of Hebron. “Let’s be honest. This not sick leave. It provides an unfunded mandate on our employers.”
Lamont, a Democrat and former businessman, said he believes the bill strikes an appropriate balance between protecting the workforce and providing safeguards so the benefit is not misused and small business owners are protected.
“Especially considering what we learned during the recent outbreak of a viral pandemic, it’s appropriate that we take a look at our existing paid sick days laws and evaluate how they are working and how we can strengthen them,” Lamont said in a statement.
Lamont said he will sign the bill once it passes the Senate.
Biden picks up another big union endorsement, this one from building trades workers
President Joe Biden talks with NABTU President Sean McGarvey after speaking to the North America’s Building Trade Union National Legislative Conference, Wednesday, April 24, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) President Joe Biden speaks to the North America’s Building Trade Union National Legislative Conference, Wednesday, April 24, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
SINGING SOLIDARITY FOREVER President Joe Biden arrives to speak to the North America’s Building Trade Union National Legislative Conference, Wednesday, April 24, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden picked up the endorsement of North America’s Building Trades Unions at a Wednesday event where the president and his allies set out to dismantle Republican Donald Trump’s reputation as a successful real estate developer.
“Donald Trump is incapable of running anything,” said Sean McGarvey, the organization’s president. “God help us if he gets anywhere near the White House in the future.”
The event, held in a Washington hotel ballroom with a boisterous crowd of union members, was another salvo in the battle for votes from blue collar workers. Trump has tried to chip away at Democrats’ traditional advantage with organized labor, while Biden has been adding to his roster of endorsements and trying to fend off his predecessor’s comeback bid.
Biden said unions would help him make Trump a “loser again,” and he mocked Trump’s inability to pass infrastructure legislation when he was president, saying “he never built a damn thing.”
The Democratic president repeatedly torched his likely Republican opponent as a callous businessman who turned firing people into entertainment as part of his long-running reality show “The Apprentice.”
“He looks down on us. I’m not joking. Think about it,” Biden said. “Think about the guys you grew up with that you’d like to get in the corner and just give him a straight left. I’m not suggesting you hit the president. But we all know those guys growing up.”
Biden recently campaigned in his childhood hometown of Scranton, Pennsylvania, and he’s increasingly used economic arguments to portray Trump as out of touch with workers’ concerns.
In this election, Biden said, “it’s either Scranton values or Mar-a-Lago values.”
A Trump campaign spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But Trump has also sought support from organized labor, including meeting with the Teamsters earlier this year.
“Usually a Republican wouldn’t get that endorsement,” Trump said. “But in my case it’s different because I’ve employed thousands of Teamsters and I thought we should come over and pay our respects.”
TRUE TRUMP FACT: TEAMSTERS WERE REGULAR ENDORSERS OF REPULICAN POTUS CANDIDATES INCLUDING RICHRD NIXON
Trump’s popularity with white working class voters has been a challenge for Democrats who puzzle over his appeal.
McGarvey promised “an unprecedented field program in key battleground states” to help defeat Trump this year.
How US changes to ‘noncompete’ agreements and overtime pay could affect workers
The Federal Trade Commission building is seen, Jan. 28, 2015, in Washington. U.S. companies would no longer be able to bar employees from taking jobs with competitors under a rule approved by the FTC on Tuesday, April 23, 2024, though the rule seems sure to be challenged in court. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) A hiring sign is displayed in Riverwoods, Ill., Tuesday, April 16, 2024. The Biden administration has finalized a new rule set to make millions of more salaried workers eligible for overtime pay in the U.S. The move marks the largest expansion in federal overtime eligibility seen in decades. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh, File)
BY CATHY BUSSEWITZ AND MAE ANDERSON April 24, 2024
NEW YORK (AP) — For millions of American workers, the federal government took two actions this week that could bestow potentially far-reaching benefits.
In one move, the Federal Trade Commission voted to ban noncompete agreements, which bar millions of workers from leaving their employers to join a competitor or start a rival business for a specific period of time. The FTC’s move, which is already being challenged in court, would mean that such employees could apply for jobs they weren’t previously eligible to seek.
In a second move, the Biden administration finalized a rule that will make millions more salaried workers eligible for overtime pay. The rule significantly raises the salary level that workers could earn and still qualify for overtime.
The new rules don’t take effect immediately. And they won’t benefit everyone. So what exactly would these rules mean for America’s workers?
WHAT IS A NONCOMPETE AGREEMENT?
Noncompete agreements, which employers have deployed with greater frequency in recent years, limit an employee’s ability to jump ship for a rival company or start a competing business for a stated period of time. The idea is to prevent employees from taking a company’s trade secrets, job leads or sales relationships to a direct competitor, who could immediately capitalize on them.
Many industries use noncompete agreements, often among their salespeople, said Paul Lopez, managing partner at Tripp Scott, a Florida law firm that has handled more than 100 cases involving noncompete clauses.
“They’re the ones out there generating leads and sales,” Lopez said. “The last thing you as a business will want is for that person to go over to your competition and do the same thing.”
WHO IS TYPICALLY SUBJECT TO THESE AGREEMENTS?
People may assume that noncompete agreements apply only to high-level executives in the technology or finance industries. But many lower-level workers are subject to the restrictions as well. The rules vary by state.
In Florida, one medical sales worker was barred by his employer from joining a competitor for 10 years — and once he left his job, was unemployed for more than five years, said Stefanie Camfield, assistant general counsel with Engage PEO, a Florida company that handles human resources for small and medium-sized businesses.
“He was able to find another sales position in a completely different industry,” Camfield said. “But the learning curve was there, so he wasn’t making the same amount of money.”
In another case, a company in the optical industry that had hired a sales associate was informed by his former employer that it intended to enforce a noncompete agreement. So the optical company terminated the employee, Camfield said.
“They thought they had a qualified sales associate hired and ready to get to work, and all of a sudden now they’re back to square one.”
WHY BAN NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS?
Some view noncompete agreements as harmful and unfair to workers by limiting their mobility. Career opportunities are often more attractive outside an employee’s current workplace. And with restrictions on the type of work they can do for a competitor, it can be hard to shift into a more suitable or lucrative position.
Many hiring managers, after all, most value job candidates who already have a certain level of experience in the same industry.
“A noncompete would unilaterally ban someone from getting exactly the kind of job that it’s reasonable to want,” said Jennifer Tosti-Kharas, a professor of organizational behavior at Babson College in Massachusetts. “To cut people off from that is overly paternalistic. It’s using a really blunt instrument to limit people’s mobility, when in reality there are other legal mechanisms to prevent trade secrets being disclosed.”
HOW DO I KNOW IF I’M SUBJECT TO A NONCOMPETE?
People are sometimes surprised to learn that they’re bound by such an agreement. They might not even find out until after they’ve left for a new job, and their former employer intervenes and causes them to be fired.
“When you join a company, you’re so focused on the opportunity in front of you, you might not be thinking about what’s that next jump,” Tosti-Kharas said.
Experts suggest that employees consult their human resources department about any noncompete agreements that might exist. If a workplace doesn’t have an HR department, an employee should ask a lawyer for the company.
ARE TRADE SECRETS NOW LIKELY TO BE SPILLED?
There are still laws on the books that protect companies’ trade secrets. The FTC decision doesn’t change that.
And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has already filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission, calling its decision a dangerous precedent for government micromanagement of business. Lawsuits could delay any implementation of the FTC’s new rule, potentially for years.
WHAT ABOUT THE NEW OVERTIME RULES?
Starting July 1, employers of all sizes will be required pay overtime — time and a half salary after 40 hours a week — to salaried workers who make less than $43,888 a year in certain executive, administrative and professional roles. That cap will then rise to $58,656 by the start of 2025. Previously, the cap was $35,568.
WHO QUALIFIES?
The Labor Department estimates that 4 million salaried workers who weren’t previously eligible will qualify. Some occupations, though, including teachers, doctors and lawyers are not eligible for overtime pay and thus are not affected by the change. And some states, like California and New York, already have salary thresholds that exceed the federal level.
WHAT’S THE REACTION SO FAR?
Predictably, groups that represent companies have lined up against the new rule. Conversely, worker groups are applauding it as a necessary and long-overdue change.
The National Retail Federation argued that the new rules “curtail retailers’ ability to offer the most flexible, generous and tailored benefits packages to lower-level exempt employees across the industry.”
It also asserted that the new rules don’t give employers adequate time to make the changes needed. And it complained that the inclusion of automatic increases “exceeds the Department’s legal authority and oversteps longstanding Fair Labor Standards Act and Administrative Procedure Act principles.”
On the social media site X, the AFL-CIO labor organization said the rules will “restore and extend overtime protections for hard-working Americans.”
WILL THE CHANGES BE CHALLENGED IN COURT?
Almost certainly so. A 2016 effort by the Obama administration was scuttled in court just days before it was set to take effect. Because the new overtime rules won’t take effect until July 1, groups have time to study the ruling before mounting a challenge.
“I would expect there will be some legal challenges,” said Ted Hollis, a partner at the law firm Quarles & Brady. “When the Obama administration published its proposed rule in 2016, that was almost immediately challenged in court.”
HOW SHOULD BUSINESSES PREPARE FOR THIS?
Companies of all sizes will have to reclassify workers who will now qualify for overtime pay — and make sure they track hours and pay them properly.
Another option is to raise employees’ salaries so they would remain exempt from overtime. But employers should keep in mind that two more increases are coming under the new timetable.
They’ll also have to determine how they will budget for the extra pay for overtime. Small businesses will have the toughest time.
“Some are going to have to cut workers,” Hollis said. “Others will have to cut hours from existing workers.
“Some are going to have to raise prices, and some probably won’t be able to figure out a way to make it economically work and wind up having to shut down, unfortunately.”
MAE ANDERSON New York-based reporter covering small business.
Another ex-State Department official alleges Israeli military gets ‘special treatment’ on abuses
Israeli honor guard soldiers salute during the funeral Israeli reserve Major Dor Zimel in Even Yehuda, Israel, Monday, April 22, 2024. Zimel , 27, died of his wounds after Iran-backed Lebanese militant Hezbollah group fired a volley of rockets and drones on northern Israel on April 17. The attack wounded at least 14 Israeli soldiers, six seriously, the army said. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)Read More
WASHINGTON (AP) — A former senior U.S. official who until recently helped oversee human-rights compliance by foreign militaries receiving American military assistance said Wednesday that he repeatedly observed Israel receiving “special treatment” from U.S. officials when it came to scrutiny of allegations of Israeli military abuses of Palestinian civilians.
The allegation comes as the Biden administration faces intense pressure over its ally’s treatment of Palestinian civilians during Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza. And matters because of who said it: Charles O. Blaha. Before leaving the post in August, he was a director of a State Department security and human rights office closely involved in helping ensure that foreign militaries receiving American military aid follow U.S. and international humanitarian and human rights laws.
Blaha said his departure from the State Department after decades of service was not related to the U.S.-Israeli security relationship. He is the second senior State official involved in that relationship to assert that when it comes to Israel, the U.S. is reluctant to enforce laws required of foreign militaries receiving American aid.
“In my experience, Israel gets special treatment that no other country gets,” Blaha said. “And there is undue deference, in many cases, given” to Israeli officials’ side of things when the U.S. asks questions about allegations of Israeli wrongdoing against Palestinians, he added.
He spoke to reporters at an event where he and other members of an unofficial, self-formed panel of former senior U.S. civilian and military officials released a report pointing to civilian deaths in specific airstrikes in Gaza. They said there was “compelling and credible” evidence that Israeli forces had acted illegally.
Blaha’s comments echoed those of another State Department official and panel member, Josh Paul. Paul resigned as a director overseeing arms transfers to other countries’ militaries in October in protest of the U.S. rushing arms to Israel amid its war in Gaza.
Asked about the allegations from the two, a State Department spokesman, Vedant Patel, said “there is no double standard, and there is no special treatment.”
Israeli officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Israel consistently says it follows all laws in its use of U.S. military aid, investigates allegations against its security forces and holds offenders accountable.
Israel historically is the United States’ biggest recipient of military aid, and Biden on Wednesday signed legislation for an additional $26 billion in wartime assistance. But Biden has come under growing pressure over that support as Palestinian deaths mount.
The latest Israel-Hamas war began on Oct. 7, when Hamas and Islamic Jihad, two militant groups backed by Iran, carried out a cross-border attack that killed 1,200 people in Israel. Israel responded with an offensive in Gaza that has caused widespread devastation and killed more than 34,000 people, according to local health officials.
In coming days, the administration says it will announce its official findings from reviews it did into allegations of especially serious human rights abuses by specific Israeli military units. Those units would be barred from receiving U.S. military aid if the U.S. review confirms those allegations.
Separately, the Biden administration also is expected to disclose by May 8 whether it has verified assurances from Israel that the country is not using U.S. military aid in a way that violates international or human rights law. Both Israel’s written assurance and the U.S. verification were mandated by a new presidential national security memo that Biden issued in February.
The February agreement was negotiated between the Biden administration and members of his own Democratic Party, who had been pushing for the U.S. to begin conditioning military aid to Israel on improving treatment of Palestinian civilians.
Panel members released their report Wednesday to urge the U.S. to scrutinize specific attacks in Gaza that the former officials argued should lead to a conclusion that Israel was wrong when it confirmed it was complying with the laws. If that determination is made, the U.S. could then suspend military aid.
Wednesday’s unofficial report points to 17 specific strikes on apartments, refugee camps, private homes, journalists and aid workers for which the former U.S. officials and independent experts allege there’s no evidence of the kind of military target present to justify the high civilian death tolls.
They include an Oct. 31 airstrike on a Gaza apartment building that killed 106 civilians, including 54 children. Israeli officials offered no reason for the strike, and a Human Rights Watch probe found no evidence of a military target there, the officials said. Israel has said in many of the instances that it is investigating.
Psychologist becomes first person in Peru to die by euthanasia after fighting in court for years
Peruvian psychologist Ana Estrada, who suffered from an incurable disease that weakened her muscles and had her confined to her bed for several years, died by euthanasia, becoming the first person in the country to obtain the right to die with medical assistance.
(AP video by Mauricio Munoz, Cesar Barreto)
BY FRANKLIN BRICEÑO April 23, 2024
LIMA, Peru (AP) — A Peruvian psychologist who had an incurable disease that weakened her muscles and left her bedridden for several years died by euthanasia, her lawyer said Monday, becoming the first person in the country to obtain the right to die with medical assistance.
Ana Estrada fought for years in Peruvian courts for the right to die with dignity, and became a celebrity in the conservative country where euthanasia and assisted suicide are illegal.
In 2022, Estrada was granted an exception by the nation’s Supreme Court, which upheld a ruling by a lower court that gave Estrada the right to decide when to end her life, and said that those who helped her would not be punished. Estrada became the first person to obtain the right to die with medical assistance in Peru.
“Ana’s struggle for her right to die with dignity has helped to educate thousands of Peruvians about this right and the importance of defending it,” her lawyer, Josefina Miró Quesada, said in a statement. “Her struggle transcended our nation’s borders.”
Estrada, 47, had an incurable disease called polymyositis that wastes away muscles. She began to present the first symptoms as a teenager and started to use a wheelchair at the age of 20 because she had lost the strength to walk.
Estrada obtained a psychology degree and became a therapist. She earned enough money to buy her own apartment and became independent from her parents.
By 2017, however, Estrada’s condition worsened and she could no longer get up from her bed. She had difficulty breathing and survived pneumonia. And even though she could not type, Estrada used transcription software to produce a blog called “Ana for a death with dignity,” where she discussed her struggles and her decision to seek euthanasia.
“I am no longer free,” she said in an interview with the Associated Press in 2018. “I am not the same person I was before.”
With the help of Peru’s Human Rights Ombudsman, Estrada won a lawsuit that gave her the right to die with euthanasia. From her bed, she participated in court sessions through video conferences.
Estrada told judges in 2022 that she valued life, and did not want to die immediately, but wanted to have the freedom to decide when to end her life.
“I want to accede to euthanasia when I can no longer sustain suffering in life,” she said. “And when I decide to bid farewell to my loved ones in peace and with tranquility.”
Only a handful of countries have legalized euthanasia, including Canada, Belgium and Spain. Some U.S. states, including Maine and Oregon, allow physician-assisted suicide, where a doctor provides a terminally ill patient with the means to end their life.
Euthanasia is illegal in most Latin American countries except for Colombia, which legalized it in 2015, and Ecuador, which decriminalized the practice in February.
Aboriginal spears taken by Captain Cook in 1770 are returned to Australia’s Indigenous people
Undated handout photo issued by Cambridge University of four Aboriginal spears that were brought to England by Captain James Cook more than 250 years ago and have now been repatriated to Australia in a ceremony at Trinity College in Cambridge, Tuesday April 23, 2024. (Cambridge University via AP)
Undated handout photo issued by Cambridge University of Elisabeth Bowes, Leonard Hill, Stephen Smith and Noeleen Timbery with four Aboriginal spears that were brought to England by Captain James Cook more than 250 years ago and have now been repatriated to Australia in a ceremony at Trinity College in Cambridge, Tuesday April 23, 2024. (Cambridge University via AP) Undated handout photo issued by Cambridge University of two of four Aboriginal spears that were brought to England by Captain James Cook more than 250 years ago and have now been repatriated to Australia in a ceremony at Trinity College in Cambridge, Tuesday April 23, 2024. (Cambridge University via AP)
LONDON (AP) — Four Aboriginal spears that were taken to England by Captain James Cook more than 250 years ago were returned Tuesday to Australia’s Indigenous community at a ceremony in Cambridge University.
The artifacts were all that remain of some 40 spears that Cook and botanist Joseph Banks took in April 1770, at the time of the first contact between Cook’s crew and the Indigenous people of Kamay, or Botany Bay.
The spears were presented to Trinity College, Cambridge by John Montagu, the 4th Earl of Sandwich the following year, along with other items from Cook’s voyage across the Pacific. The spears have been held at the university’s Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology since the early 20th century.
Their return, agreed last year following a campaign and a formal repatriation request, was hailed as a step toward reconciliation and a greater understanding of Britain and Australia’s shared history.
Sally Davies, head of Trinity College, said it was the “right decision” to return the spears and that the institution was “committed to reviewing the complex legacies of the British empire, not least in our collections.”
The spears were “exceptionally significant” because they were the first artifacts collected by the British from any part of Australia that remain, said Nicholas Thomas, director of Cambridge’s archaeology museum.
“They reflect the beginnings of a history of misunderstanding and conflict,” he said.
The Gujaga Foundation, which leads cultural and research programs within the La Perouse Aboriginal community, said the artifacts’ return marked a “momentous occasion.”
“The spears were pretty much the first point of European contact, particularly British contact with Aboriginal Australia,” said Ray Ingrey, the foundation’s director.
“Ultimately, they’ll be put on permanent display for everyone to go see, at the very spot they were taken from 250 years ago,” he added.
The spears were taken by members of Cook’s expedition from an unoccupied Aboriginal campsite, according to the National Museum of Australia’s website.
A diary entry by Banks that the website cited read: ”(We) threw into the house to them some beads, ribbands, cloths &c. as presents and went away. We however thought it no improper measure to take away with us all the lances (spears) which we could find about the houses, amounting in number to forty or fifty.”
Ingrey said the spears were “undoubtedly taken without permission.”
The spears will be displayed at a new visitor center to be built at Kurnell, Kamay.
CRYPTO CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
DOJ recommends 36-month prison sentence for former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao
The Department of Justice is seeking a 36-month prison sentence and a $50 million fine for former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao. File Photo by Miguel A. Lopes/EPA-EFE
April 24 (UPI) -- Federal prosecutors Tuesday recommended 36 months in prison and a $50 million fine for former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao after he pleaded guilty to violating money laundering laws under the Bank Secrecy Act.
In the sentencing memo filed Tuesday, prosecutors said Zhao who founded Binance in 2017 was "operating on a Wild West model that, as one compliance employee said, told criminals 'come to Binance we got cake for you,'" as the platform rapidly grew to become the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange within a year.
The sentencing recommendation exceeds the federal guidelines range of 10-16 months. His sentencing is expected April 30.
Prosecutors said billions in illegal profits were made as Zhao "reaped vast rewards for his violation of U.S. law, and the price of that violation must be significant to effectively punish Zhao for his criminal acts and to deter others who are tempted to build fortunes and business empires by breaking U.S. law."
While prosecutors said the $50 million fine is a small fraction of Zhao's wealth, it's "a historically large fine for an individual U.S. defendant."
Binance pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the BSA, violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and failure to register as a money-transferring business.
Under a plea agreement, the crypto exchange agreed to pay $4.3 billion in penalties, the most ever paid by a money services business, according to the Justice Department.
"These exceptional financial penalties-which directly resulted from Zhao's conduct demonstrate the nature and seriousness of Zhao's offense," the sentencing memo said. "Those penalties are tied directly to the profits Binance earned and the vast transactions it processed, reflecting the extraordinary scope of the scheme."
The sentencing memo said Zhao violated U.S. law on "an unprecedented scale" as he led the massive financial institution, processing trillions of dollars in cryptocurrency trades per year.
The Justice Department said Binance also harmed U.S. national security by violating sanctions against Iran while "illicit actors flocked to the exchange."
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have separately sued Binance for the alleged mishandling of customer assets while operating an illegal, unregistered exchange in the United States.
Zhao quit as Binance CEO in November after agreeing to the plea deal with the Department of Justice.
On Tuesday Philippines market regulators ordered Apple and Google to remove the Binance app from their stores for securities violations and to prevent "the further proliferation of its illegal activities" in the country.
Side effects of 'magic mushrooms' similar to regular antidepressants
By Ernie Mundell, HealthDay News People in a new study who took psilocybin often experienced headache, nausea, anxiety, dizziness and elevated blood pressure -- side effects similar to those seen with regular antidepressants. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay News
Many people with tough-to-treat depression may be trying psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms, as an alternative to antidepressants.
Thinking that it's a "natural" drug, folks might assume it comes without side effects.
That assumption would be wrong.
People in a new study who took psilocybin often experienced headache, nausea, anxiety, dizziness and elevated blood pressure -- side effects similar to those seen with regular antidepressants, according to a team from the University of Georgia in Athens (UGA).
The good news: Such side effects were only temporary. It's less clear if longer-term side effects might emerge with time, the researchers noted.
The short-term side effects "are what we may expect from your traditional antidepressants because those medications work in a similar fashion to psilocybin. They both target serotonin receptors," explained senior study author Dr. Joshua Caballero, an associate professor in UGA's College of Pharmacy.
"It's very encouraging," he added in a university news release, "because the studies we examined consist of just one or two doses per patient, and we're finding that the beneficial effects of psilocybin may stay for months when treating depression."
Psilocybin was shunned by the medical community for decades because, at higher doses, it can have hallucinatory properties. But used under the guidance and supervision of a therapist, the drug is having a comeback as a new form of antidepressant.
But what about any side effects?
To answer that question, Caballero's group looked at data from six different studies on the supervised use of single doses of psilocybin against depression. The studies included a total of 528 people.
They found a number of side effects, among which nausea, dizziness and elevated blood pressure were most common. These effects appeared to dissipate within 48 hours.
Importantly, "psilocybin use was not associated with risk of paranoia and transient thought disorder," the researchers said.
The findings were published recently in the journal JAMA Network Open.
"At some point, I do think that psilocybin will become a treatment option, and when it does, we need to know what the side effects and potential long-term complications are," Caballero said.
Always use the drug under the supervision of a trusted therapist, he said. One recent study found this was key to successful treatment.
"I would urge caution for people that are thinking this is a magic cure and then go out and take excess mushrooms," Caballero said. "Without proper monitoring, you won't know the concentration of psilocybin in those mushrooms and you could have a bad trip or other negative outcome."
The researchers added that the longer-term effects, if any, of psilocybin therapy are unknown.
"There is still a lot we don't know about the potential long-term side effects and more serious rare side effects of psilocybin use," Caballero said. He noted that standard antidepressants already carry a boxed warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential for an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and suicide in young adults.
Could psilocybin use have a similar risk? It's just not clear yet, Cabellero and colleagues said.
Still, the overall news is good for folks battling tough depression.
"If we can safely use this drug in a controlled environment, I think it could be groundbreaking for a lot of patients that need it," Caballero said.
Germany to restart funding for UNRWA after independent report
Israeli right-wing protesters look at a banner hung on the entrance to the UNRWA, United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, headquarters in Jerusalem on March 20. Germany said it will start funding the organization again. File Photo by Debbie Hill/UPI | License Photo
April 24 (UPI) -- Germany said it plans to resume funding the United Nations Release Agency for Palestinian Refugees after joining more than a dozen other countries in suspending support amid allegations that employees were involved in the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel.
Germany's Federal Foreign Office and Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development issued a joint statement announcing that the country would "shortly resume its cooperation with UNRWA in Gaza" following the release of a U.N.-commissioned report that found Israel did not offer enough evidence to support the claims.
"By resuming our acute cooperation, we are supporting the vital and currently irreplaceable role played by UNRWA in meeting the basic needs of the people in Gaza -- since other international aid organizations, too, currently rely on UNRWA's operative structures there," the agencies said.
UNRWA has long been the main conduit for humanitarian support for Palestinians while Israel had complained for years that Hamas had hijacked it.
The report, led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna, found that the UNRWA regularly provided lists of employees to Israel for vetting and had not been informed by the government of "any concerns relating to any UNRWA staff based on these staff lists since 2011.
It also recommended increasing internal oversight of UNRWA, improving external monitoring of external project management, continuing to regularly share staff lists with Israel and expanding internal training.
Germany said those recommendations "must now be implemented without delay."
"Germany will liaise closely with its key international partners on the disbursement of further funding," it said. "UNRWA's short-term financing needs in Gaza are currently covered by existing funding."
Sixteen countries, including Germany, suspended payments to UNRWA totaling $450 million after Israel charged that 12 of its workers took part in the Oct. 7 terrorist attack on the country, sparking Israel's long military response.
Since the pause, Australia, Canada, Japan and Sweden have started to fund UNRWA again as doubts started to be raised about the accuracy of Israel's allegation. The independent report claimed that Israel never provided information about its charges. Britain said it would wait for the report to be officially published before deciding to restart funding.
Japan's Lunar Excursion Vehicle (LEV-2) shows Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's SLIM (Smart Lander for Investigating Moon) on the Moon's surface, on January 20. The Lander survived a third lunar night, JAXA said on Wednesday. Photo by JAXA/EPA-EFE
April 24 (UPI) -- Japan's moon lander has survived a third lunar night, something that surprised even its designers, as it continued to take snapshots and probe the satellite's surface, officials said on Wednesday.
The Smart Lander for Investigating the Moon, or SLIM, came back to life after emerging from the darkness and sent signals to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.
"Last night (the night of April 23), we were able to successfully communicate with SLIM which had started up again, and confirmed that SLIM had survived for the third time," JAXA said on X on Wednesday. The space agency released a photo taken by the lander.
SLIM's ability to last lunar nights, which can last up to two weeks has been a concern since its landing but the spacecraft has continued to defy skeptics.
"SLIM has maintained its primary functions even after three overnight stays, which was not anticipated in its design," JAXA said. "We will continue to closely monitor SLIM's condition and hope to identify areas that deteriorate depending on the lunar day and night environment, as well as areas that are not prone to deterioration."
SLIM landed on the Moon on Jan. 20, allowing Japan to join the United States, China, Russia and India as the only countries to make a successful moon landing. SLIM, though, landed upside down and initially lost power for nine days before returning to power.
Last month, JAXA said the SLIM had survived its second lunar night that lasted two weeks and continued to function and communicate.
Eruption of mega-magnetic star lights up nearby galaxy
Thanks to ESA satellites, an international team including UNIGE researchers has detected a giant eruption coming from a magnetar, an extremely magnetic neutron star
UNIVERSITÉ DE GENÈVE
IMAGE:
ARTIST'S IMPRESSION OF A MAGNETAR. MAGNETARS ARE THE COSMIC OBJECTS WITH THE STRONGEST MAGNETIC FIELDS EVER MEASURED IN THE UNIVERSE.
While ESA’s satellite INTEGRAL was observing the sky, it spotted a burst of gamma-rays - high-energy photons - coming from the nearby galaxy M82. Only a few hours later, ESA’s XMM-Newton X-ray space telescope searched for an afterglow from the explosion but found none. An international team, including researchers from the University of Geneva (UNIGE), realised that the burst must have been an extra-galactic flare from a magnetar, a young neutron star with an exceptionally strong magnetic field. The discovery is published in the journal Nature.
On 15 November 2023, ESA’s satellite INTEGRAL spotted a sudden explosion from a rare object. For only a tenth of a second, a short burst of energetic gamma-rays appeared in the sky. “The satellite data were received in the INTEGRAL Science Data Centre (ISDC), based on the Ecogia site of the UNIGE Astronomy Department, from where a gamma-ray burst alert was sent out to astronomers worldwide, only 13 seconds after its detection,” explains Carlo Ferrigno, senior research associate in the Astronomy Department at UNIGE Faculty of Science, PI of the ISDC and co-author of the publication.
The IBAS (Integral Burst Alert System) software gave an automatic localisation coinciding with the galaxy M82, 12 million light-years away. This alert system was developed and is operated by scientists and engineers from the UNIGE in collaboration with international colleagues.
A curious signal from a nearby galaxy
“We immediately realised that this was a special alert. Gamma-ray bursts come from far-away and anywhere in the sky, but this burst came from a bright nearby galaxy,” explains Sandro Mereghetti of the National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF–IASF) in Milan, Italy, lead author of the publication and contributor of IBAS. The team immediately requested ESA’s XMM-Newton space telescope to perform a follow-up observation of the burst’s location as soon as possible. If this had been a short gamma-ray burst, caused by two colliding neutron stars, the collision would have created gravitational waves and have an afterglow in X-rays and visible light.
However, XMM-Newton’s observations only showed the hot gas and stars in the galaxy. Using ground-based optical telescopes, including the Italian Telescopio Nazionale Galileo and the French Observatoire de Haute-Provence, they also looked for a signal in visible light, starting only a few hours after the explosion, but again did not find anything. With no signal in X-rays and visible light, and no gravitational waves measured by detectors on Earth (LIGO/VIRGO/KAGRA), the most certain explanation is that the signal came from a magnetar.
Magnetars: mega-magnetic stars, recently dead
“When stars more massive than eight times the Sun die, they explode in a supernova that leaves a black hole or neutron star behind. Neutron stars are very compact stellar remnants with more than the mass of the Sun packed into a sphere with the size of the Canton of Geneva. They rotate quickly and have strong magnetic fields.” explains Volodymyr Savchenko, senior research associate in the Astronomy Department at UNIGE Faculty of Science, and co-author of the publication. Some young neutron stars have extra strong magnetic fields, more than 10 000 times that of typical neutron stars. These are called magnetars. They emit energy away in flares, and occasionally these flares are gigantic.
However, in the past 50 years of gamma-ray observations, only three giant flares have been identified as coming from magnetars in our galaxy. These outbursts are very strong: one that was detected in December 2004, came from 30 000 light-years from us but was still powerful enough to affect the upper layers of Earth’s atmosphere, like the Solar flares, coming from much closer to us, do.
The flare detected by INTEGRAL is the first firm confirmation of a magnetar flare outside of the Milky Way. M82 is a bright galaxy where star formation takes place. In these regions, massive stars are born, live short turbulent lives and leave behind a neutron star. “The discovery of a magnetar in this region confirms that magnetars are likely young neutron stars,” adds Volodymyr Savchenko. The search for more magnetars will continue in other extra-galactic star-forming regions, to understand these extraordinary astronomical objects. If astronomers can find many more, they can start to understand how often these flares happen and how neutron stars lose energy in the process.
INTEGRAL, a key instrument in a race against time
Outbursts of such short duration can only be captured serendipitously when an observatory is already pointing in the right direction. This makes INTEGRAL with its large field of view, more than 3000 times greater than the sky area covered by the Moon, so important for these detections.
Carlo Ferrigno explains: “Our automatic data processing system is highly reliable and enables us to alert the community immediately.” When unexpected observations like this are picked up, INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton can be flexible in their schedules, which is essential in time-crucial discoveries. In this case, had the observations been performed even just a day later, there would not have been such strong proof that this was indeed a magnetar and not a gamma-ray burst.
''A magnetar giant flare in the nearby starburst galaxy M82''
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
24-Apr-2024
Growing plants on Mars: Utah State University Scientists among multi-institution team recognized with NASA Achievement Award
Lance Seefeldt, Bruce Bugbee among researchers honored for foundational research efforts toward sustaining human exploration on Mars
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
VIDEO:
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SCIENTISTS BRUCE BUGBEE AND LANCE SEEFELDT WERE PART OF THE CUBES STRI TEAM THAT SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCTED A FIVE-YEAR, $15 MILLION NASA-FUNDED MULTI-INSTITUTION PROJECT EXPLORING HOW TO GROW PLANTS ON MARS. NASA RECOGNIZED THEIR TEAM’S EFFORTS APRIL 24, 2024, WITH AN AGENCY GROUP ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
China to send fresh crew to Tiangong space station
Astronauts Li Guangsu (left) and Ye Guangfu attend a press conference a day before the launch of the mission, at the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in the Gobi desert.
Wednesday, 24 Apr 2024
JIUQUAN, April 24 — China will send a fresh crew to its Tiangong space station tomorrow evening, Beijing’s Manned Space Agency announced, the latest mission in a programme that aims to send astronauts to the Moon by 2030.
The Shenzhou-18 mission — crewed by three astronauts — is scheduled to take off at 8.59pm Thursday from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in northwest China, Beijing announced today.
It will be led by Ye Guangfu, a fighter pilot and astronaut who was previously part of the Shenzhou-13 crew in 2021.
He will be joined by astronauts Li Cong and Li Guangsu, who are heading into space for the first time.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Commander Ye described the launch as a “new beginning”.
“Facing the challenge, my two teammates and I are fully prepared. We are full of confidence in completing this mission!” he said.
Li Guangsu, in turn, said he wanted to take a “good look at the beautiful blue planet, the splendid mountains and rivers of the motherland, and find the places that have nurtured me along the way”.
“I also want to see for my lovely child if the stars in the sky can really twinkle or not,” he added.
The latest batch of Tiangong astronauts will stay in orbit for six months, carrying out experiments in gravity and physics, as well as in life sciences.
They will also carry out a “project on high-resolution global greenhouse gas detection”, Deputy Director General of the CMSA Lin Xiqiang said, according to state news agency Xinhua.
“All pre-launch preparations are on schedule,” he said.
“They will work with other active astronauts to carry out the follow-up space station missions and to realise the country’s manned lunar landing.”
The Tiangong, which means “heavenly palace”, is the crown jewel of a space programme that has landed robotic rovers on Mars and the Moon, and made China the third country to independently put humans in orbit.
It is constantly crewed by rotating teams of three astronauts, with construction completed in 2022.
The Tiangong is expected to remain in low Earth orbit at between 400 and 450 kilometres (250 and 280 miles) above the planet for at least 10 years.
The new crew will replace the Shenzhou-17 team, who were sent to the station in October. Moon by 2030?
Plans for China’s “space dream” have been put into overdrive under President Xi Jinping.
The world’s second-largest economy has pumped billions of dollars into its military-run space programme in an effort to catch up with the United States and Russia.
Beijing also aims to send a crewed mission to the Moon by 2030, and plans to build a base on the lunar surface.
China has been effectively excluded from the International Space Station since 2011, when the United States banned Nasa from engaging with the country — pushing Beijing to develop its own orbital outpost.
China’s space agency said on Wednesday it had secured new international partners for its planned lunar base, known as the International Lunar Research Station, which Beijing has said will be completed by 2030.
The partners include Nicaragua, the Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organisation and the Arab Union for Astronomy and Space Sciences, Xinhua said.
— AFP
Watch: Nasa, Rocket Lab launch solar sail from Hawke's Bay
Nasa has launched its new solar sail mission from the Māhia Peninsula in Hawke's Bay.
Once at a Sun-synchronous orbit, about 1000 km above Earth, the spacecraft will deploy its sails and use the pressure of sunlight for propulsion, instead of rocket fuel.
If the microwave oven-sized CubeSat is successfully deployed, the operation would be a precursor to larger-scale missions to the Moon and Mars, Nasa said.
The mission's principal investigator, Keats Wilkie, told Morning Report the solar sail was a thin but "very large mirror in space" made out of aluminium and plastic.
"The pressure of light exerts a pressure on objects. The sunlight bounces off of our sail and that gives us a tiny little push in the opposite direction.
"By angling our solar sail to the sun, sort of like a sailboat, you change your angle of the sail with the wind, we can change the direction of flight and we can do all this without burning any rocket fuel or propellant, so it's essentially a propellantless propulsion in space, so we never have to worry about running out of fuel."
An artist's impression of the Advanced Composite Solar Sail System spacecraft sailing in space using the energy of the Sun. Photo: Nasa / Aero Animation / Ben Schweighart
The satellite was a small box and inside it was a tightly packaged structure of composite booms and a very thin plastic film reflecting coating on it, he said. When fully deployed it measures about 10x10 metres.
It is not the first solar sail but it is the first to be launched from New Zealand.
"This is the first solar sail system that has all of the systems you need to actually fly and control the solar sail for propulsion."
The mission's primary objective is to successfully demonstrate the deployment of a new boom made from flexible polymer and carbon fibre materials which are stiffer and lighter than previous boom designs.
The solar sail will also perform a series of manoeuvres to demonstrate orbit raising and lowering.
Mariano Perez, quality assurance engineer at NASA Ames, inspects the Advanced Composite Solar Sail System spacecraft. Photo: Nasa / Brandon Torres
"It's on a path for verifying the technology we're using for much, much larger solar sails that we'd like to build in the next few years," Wilkie said.
"So the same technology will be used for very large sails that will sail into deep space and be used for science and space weather and other types of missions for Nasa and other customers."
He said everything was looking good ahead of the launch.
While in flight, there is a possibility of spotting the spacecraft with the naked eye in the night sky.
Nasa's Advanced Composite Solar Sail System was one of two satellites that Rocket Lab launched from Māhia Peninsula on Wednesday morning.
The other was for monitoring natural disasters along the Korean Peninsula.
Vandenberg Space Force Base Deemed Contaminant Free Amid Rising Cancer Concerns Among Missile Personnel
The Air Force has deemed Vandenberg Space Force Base in California free of certain potentially dangerous contaminants following a study prompted by concerns over rising cancer rates and exposure to carcinogens among service members who work with America's nuclear missiles.
The findings, released publicly Monday, "found no instances of contamination above regulatory action levels" after testing for polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, and volatile organic compounds that are believed to have negative health effects, Air Force Global Strike Command said in a statement. The Space Force base conducted surface testing and air sampling as part of the study.
Vandenberg, alongside America's three intercontinental ballistic missile bases—Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota and F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming —have all undergone testing for potential contaminants that could be linked to an alarming number of illnesses such as breast cancer, prostate cancer and blood cancers being reported among the U.S. military's missileers and maintainers.
"Ensuring the most comprehensive assessment of the operational environments our nuclear team operates in, the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine's team added our test and training sites at Vandenberg to the [missile community cancer study]," Lt. Gen. Michael Lutton, the deputy commander of Global Strike Command, said in a statement. "Leadership remains committed to a comprehensive, science-based, transparent [study] serving our nuclear force and families."
Vandenberg, located on California's Central Coast, provides training for approximately 450 missileers and maintainers every year, using simulators that look like the launch control centers and launch facilities where, if called upon, officers would be able to fire a nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile at a moment's notice.
Amid concerns from missileers and maintainers about carcinogens at nuclear missile bases, officials decided to evaluate the testing and training sites too.
Military.com has conducted a monthslong investigation into cancer among missileers that included government records requests, a two-day site visit to one of the nation's nuclear missile bases, and dozens of interviews with current and former Air Force missileers, as well as the relatives of some who have passed away amid wide-ranging cancer concerns related to potential carcinogenic exposure to substances in those Cold War-era facilities.
The newsroom's investigation found the U.S. government has overlooked evidence of cancer clusters for years. Two studies of missileer cancer clusters in the early 2000s failed to recognize the growing problem in the community, with that lack of recognition making it difficult for some missileers to prove to the Department of Veterans Affairs that their illnesses were related to military service, a precursor to securing some benefits.
The military branches also appear to have failed to account properly for contaminants that have been linked to cancer for decades, particularly PCBs, which were detected last year at unsafe levels in some missile facilities during an initial round of environmental sampling and cleaning efforts that are still underway at those bases.
PBCs were detected at one launch facility and one missile alert facility at Vandenberg, according to officials, but they were well below the Environmental Protection Agency's threshold.
"Because these are below regulatory cleanup levels, no additional remediation is required. These sites will be labeled and access limited to these areas to further limit risk to personnel," Air Force Global Strike Command said.
But missile maintainers have also raised concerns to Military.com about exposure to a wide variety of chemicals, toxins and carcinogens in the launch facilities, or LFs, where nuclear missiles are held.
Notably, certain soil and water samples were not taken at Vandenberg "as those are byproducts of agricultural operations and Vandenberg's simulators are not located near agricultural land," officials said. Additionally, surface samples were not taken for contaminants other than PCBs, and results from a 90-day radon sample are not yet complete.
Air Force officials announced the testing at Vandenberg, which does rocket launches and missile tests as well as missileer training, late last year as part of a wide-ranging and ongoing cancer and environmental study to address the missile community's concerns. The medical study began in March 2023, when former missileers raised concerns about high rates of blood cancers among former and current officers who had served at Malmstrom in Montana.
Officials said late last year that the results at Vandenberg would "help inform further LF testing" at other missile bases. It's not clear yet whether additional testing at other launch facilities will occur in the wake of the Vandenberg results, but officials said they are waiting for more data to inform future decisions.
The study is also examining cancer rates among missileers, security forces, maintainers, facility managers and other career fields that may be at risk from exposure to carcinogens and toxins.
Early results of that medical study, reported by Military.com last month, indicated elevated rates of breast and prostate cancers. But, so far, the research has looked only at Defense Department records. The current phase of the study did not include data from Department of Veterans Affairs medical records, the DoD cancer registry or the VA cancer registry, according to an Air Force Global Strike Command memo, and "captures fewer than 25% of total cancer cases" that will likely be found by the study, officials wrote.
That initial data on cancer rates includes DoD medical records from 2001 to the present, accounting for more than 2 million individuals. Of that number, officials found data covering roughly 84,000 missile community members, including 8,000 missileers.
It "is a limited slice of our population of interest," Air Force officials said, adding that "notably, it does not capture cases seen outside the military system."
The data set used for those initial findings found 198 cancer cases in the missile community, including 13 cases of female breast cancer, 24 cases of prostate cancer and 23 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in that cohort.
As the Air Force studies the issue, Torchlight, a group of former missile community members who have created a grassroots advocacy organization for those diagnosed with cancer, is seeking a presumptive service exemption—making it easier to get benefits—from the VA.
In an April 12 response letter, the VA said it is looking into the group's request, adding that it "will continue to gather as much science and evidence as possible to move swiftly for veterans facing serious illnesses due to military exposures."
As a nonprofit journalism organization, we depend on your support to fund more than 170 reporting projects every year on critical global and local issues. Donate any amount today to become a Pulitzer Center Champion and receive exclusive benefits!
MD PSD speech to Space Symposium: EU space security and defence
Below, the text of a speech EEAS Managing Director for Peace Security and Defence, Benedikta VON SEHERR-THOSS, recently gave on the subject of EU space security and defence to the Space Symposium in Colorado, USA.
It is a real pleasure to join you this afternoon in beautiful Colorado Springs at this important meeting.
Thank you to the Space Foundation for inviting the perspective from the European External Action Service. The EEAS, in short, is the European Union’s Foreign Affairs and Security Policy arm. Think of it as a combined Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Defence at EU level.
At EEAS, I am responsible for the EU’s Peace, Security and Defence Policy. This is a broad portfolio which ranges from dealing with the EU’s 24 civilian and military operations, including military support to Ukraine, to strategic domains – cyber, hybrid, maritime, and of course, space.
Space is a key capability of and for the EU.
Beyond being an industrial powerhouse in the defence and aerospace domain, the EU owns and operates its own space infrastructure, from the Galileo satellite navigation fleet to earth observations and soon communications constellations [which my colleague from the Commission, Christoph Kautz will outline later this afternoon] and has its own geospatial intelligence agency.
In the wider security [architecture] [governance] of EU space affairs – my responsibilities focus on space security and operational decision-making.
As our dependence on space services increases significantly, so do orbital threats.
We regularly see strategic competitors holding or preparing to hold space assets at risk:
whether through covert operations, by developing capabilities to kinetically destroy or incapacitate space infrastructure on a large scale, or by directly targeting governments, institutions and industry that are part of our unique space ecosystem.
Russia’s aggression against Ukraine only emphasised the vulnerability of our economies, societies, and defence forces to space threats.
Three key points
Allow me to share three points with you, focusing on space security and the EU’s role in ensuring it.
What is our strategy?
What do we do concretely to secure space?
And how do we work with our partners to for a stable and secure space domain?
(1) Our strategy
In the EU, we have seen a clear paradigm shift towards a stronger focus on security and defence. This certainly applies in the space domain and much beyond.
If you’re intrigued by this – I would suggest glancing at a document called The EU Strategic Compass, our guiding doctrine as a peace, security and defence actor – including in space.
Part of this shift was that for the first time, our 27 Member States mandated us to craft a dedicated Space Strategy for Security & Defence.
Fastforward to March last year – we presented our strategy and marked the EU’s recognition of space as a strategic domain – which has broad security, economic and industrial implications.
Naturally, this strategy was developed in close cooperation with our 27 Member States. I wish to acknowledge colleagues present here today from the different space commands in Europe and their governments, who contributed to the debate.
Why is this so important? Because while our MS maintain their sovereign prerogative in space security and defence we are seeing an evolution towards more cooperation in this area, and 27 Member States had begun developing a shared strategic culture for space security – this truly marks a paradigm shift.
So what does this mean in practice?
(2) What do we do concretely to respond to space threats?
This strategy has our work cut out for us across several pillars but let me focus specifically on space threat response and awareness.
Earlier this year, we had our intelligence branch formulate a classified Space Threat Landscape Analysis.
This analysis draws on increased information-sharing EU Member States and was complemented by insights from our geospatial intelligence agency, the EU Satellite Centre.
This strategic intelligence is instrumental in helping us understand the range of counter-space capabilities our competitors are developing and testing. Beyond the orbital environment, it helps us understand implications for our ground-based infrastructure, data links, and of course space industry, where our companies and technologies are at risk of being targeted by espionage or hostile takeovers.
After strategic intelligence comes insights on operational level.
For nearly a decade [since 2016], the EU has in place a Space Threat Response mechanism. Let me explain how it works:
For critical security-related events, our dedicated 24/7 team assembles a crisis staff of experts, connecting our high-level political decision-makers, including the EU’s Foreign Policy Chief at EEAS, where I work, and Member States’ with the technical experts [from the European Space Programme Agency] who monitor the security, for instance, of our global satellite navigation system Galileo.
We exercise this process yearly and just completed our space threat response exercise last month, where we simulated incidents across the range of counterspace, from cyber-attacks to kinetic manipulation which may affect our Galileo infrastructure.
Most critically perhaps, we have begun to explore the potential activation of the EU mutual assistance clause [enshrined in the EU Treaties], in case a space related incident may amount to an armed aggression on the territory of one or several EU Member States.
As a stakeholder in the chain of command of this space threat response mechanism and bearing in mind the cooperation between the EU and US on satellite navigation, it was a particular pleasure to visit the GPS control center at Schriever Space Force Base yesterday.
In the area of Space Domain Awareness, we are in regular exchange with our Member States towards detection and characterisation of space security incidents, to support possible attribution and response.
Last autumn for instance, this helped us understand and ultimately call out the DPRK for its use of ballistic missiles to launch a reconnaissance satellite.
Of course, strategic messaging around space security and technical recovery are important – but we are also preparing to extend our toolbox with additional countermeasures, including sanctions.
Another example is that our Treaties provide us with an EU mutual assistance clause which ensures EU solidarity and response in case of an armed attack. This important provision also covers space related incidents.
(3) Partnerships
The EU has partnerships in its DNA. In our security and defence policy, we will always try to work in concert with partners.
This is especially important in space security, which both lends itself to, and requires, cooperation – whether for shared strategic messaging, burden-sharing in capabilities, or exchanging data and expertise.
The US is the EU’s most important strategic partner. Space is no exception. Our annual EU US Space Security Dialogues are now in their 13th iteration, allowing high-level and expert exchanges on key areas such as evolving threats, multilateral engagement, space situational awareness or cyber security in space.
The EU also engages in dedicated space security dialogues with other likeminded partners such as Japan, and expanding our engagement with Australia, Canada, and South Korea, many represented here.
Our neighbour in Brussels, NATO is an important partner for us across our security and defence policy, and remains the main security guarantor for most of our MS. As the EU owns and operates its own space capabilities and NATO declared space as an operational domain, we intensified our space talks further.
Finally, we practice [proactive] space diplomacy, especially at multilateral level in the UN. It is crucial to open channels with the ‘less likeminded’ to avoid unintended escalation.
The UN remains a key forum for the EU, and we need to continue, together with all, to forge pragmatic steps though a responsible behaviour approach towards strengthening international security and stability in space – with renewed attention and alert this spring in view of [potential nuclear weapons in space] [potential violations of important treaties].
Conclusion
Let me leave you with three thoughts:
The EU has been preparing for a more competitive and contested space environment, and we have undergone a fundamental transformation in this regard.
We are gearing up to operate in a world where rules-based order and multilateralism are in decline and where power projection – including in space, and including in fundamentally disruptive ways – is becoming more frequent.
Europe, as a technological, economic and normative power, is one of the world’s leading space actors with space assets that provide freely accessible services to billions of users in the world. This means we have a responsibility to defend and secure space. Peace, stability and mutual respect in space is a prerogative for our work for peace and stability on the ground. Thank you.
