Friday, February 25, 2022

CPUSA & CPGB
Stop Putin’s war on Ukraine – No NATO war with Russia

February 25, 2022 
 BY MORNING STAR

Ukrainian servicemen walk among fragments of a downed aircraft in Kiev, Ukraine, Friday, Feb. 25, 2022. It was unclear what aircraft crashed and what brought it down.
 | Oleksandr Ratushniak / AP

Editor’s Note: The following article first appeared as an editorial on Feb. 24 in Morning Star, Britain’s daily socialist newspaper. People’s World reprints it in the interest of promoting voices for peace and dialogue. Russia’s attack on Ukraine is no solution to the conflict. Neither are crippling Western sanctions, which are themselves weapons of war. De-escalation and serious diplomacy that takes into account the legitimate security interests of all the countries involved are needed to end this war.

Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is a catastrophe with horrific consequences for millions in that country and beyond. Recognition of NATO’s aggressive record and the dangerous consequences of dismissing Russian fears about its expansion in no way justifies this terrifying act of war.

Nor should it blind us to the self-serving narrative Putin puts forward.

The Morning Star is well aware of the presence of neo-Nazi units like the Azov Battalion in the Ukrainian National Guard, of the torch-lit processions in Kiev honoring the Waffen SS, of the Ukrainian government’s recognition of national days to honor anti-Semitic mass murderers like Simon Petliura and Stepan Bandera.

Our paper has been documenting this since 2014. But Putin’s claim to be “de-Nazifying” Ukraine is a flimsy excuse for a blatantly expansionist invasion.

This is clear from the Russian president’s attacks on Ukraine as an “invention” of the Bolsheviks, a reference to Lenin’s revolutionary government’s recognition of national rights for the different peoples of the Soviet Union.

Putin uses the fact that the Soviet Union drew up borders for the various republics which would become independent states in 1991, and the fact that the fairness of such territorial divisions can always be disputed, to promote a nationalist revanchism of the crudest kind.

The victims in all this are the Ukrainian people. This is not in the propagandistic sense deployed by politicians whose actions have done nothing to defuse tensions between Russia and Ukraine and everything to inflame them.

Ukraine is not the “front line of democracy.” Britain, like the U.S. and E.U., connived at the violent overthrow of its elected government in the Maidan coup of 2014.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky was later elected on pledges to negotiate peace with Russia over the Donbass and, domestically, on a platform largely opposed to the wave of neoliberal economic reforms unleashed by Maidan. He attacked the privatizing healthcare reforms of U.S.-imported health minister Ulana Suprun and the “illegal privatizations” of Ukrainian land.

Natali Sevriukova reacts next to her house following a rocket attack in Kiev, Friday, Feb. 25, 2022. 
| Emilio Morenatti / AP

In power, he has been unable to act on these positions. Further land privatization, opposed by three-quarters of Ukrainians, has been forced through at the insistence of the E.U., so giant European agribusiness can buy up farmland and convert it en masse to monocultures, especially sunflower production for oil.

Ukrainians have got poorer year by year. The country has the highest poverty rates in Europe. The land that was once the breadbasket of Europe now mainly exports super-exploited labor to its neighbors.

It is unsurprising that Zelensky has been unable to negotiate peace in the Donbass. His front line there has been manned by heavily armed fascists with no interest in peace.

Ukraine’s president—whose tearful address in his native Russian to the Russian people Wednesday included the proud recollection of his grandfather’s service in the Red Army—may not have liked these neo-Nazis, but he has not been able to stem the rewriting of history demanded by Ukraine’s “Westernizers.”

Ukraine is the victim of a tug of war between Moscow and the West.

It is no apologia for Moscow to point out that by stifling the Minsk peace process, by their annual military exercises from the Baltic to the Black Sea, by rejecting out of hand any idea that NATO might agree to negotiate troop and missile reductions in Europe, Western powers have engaged in a brinkmanship that has now exploded.

The way out, however late the hour, is to address that context, commit to Ukraine not joining NATO, and to a dial-down of militaristic showboating by the world’s most powerful and dangerous military alliance.

A war between nuclear-armed Russia and the West does not bear thinking about.

The peace movement must press for an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops and challenge the “might is right” doctrine Putin has picked up from U.S. attacks on Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.


THE UKRAINE CRISIS:

> Russia invades, but there are no good guys in the Ukraine war

> NATO may get the war it wanted

> Pipeline ploy: How U.S. natural gas interests are fueling the Ukraine crisis
Anti-war protesters outside Russia's Consulate General in Kirkenes on Friday. Photo: Thomas Nilsen

Russians, Ukrainians and Norwegians in joint anti-war protest

"Putin to The Hague" - The message was clear on the doorsteps to Russia's Consulate General in the Norwegian border town.
February 25, 2022

People in Kirkenes, a 15 minutes drive from the border to Russia’s Murmansk region, are shaken by news coming from the war zones in Ukraine. The small town has a mixed population, mainly Norwegians, but also many with Russian and Ukrainian background. 

On Friday, three nationalities teamed up protesting in front of Moscow’s diplomatic mission, the northernmost Russian Consulate General in mainland Europe. 

The messages were clear: “Stop War” - ”Putin to Haag” and “Putin, Hands off Ukraine.”

“We are here to support Ukraine,” says Natalia. 

“It’s a shame what happens. I just have to tell my grandchildren that I have protested.”

Natalia says that most of her friends in Russia support Ukraine, but they are afraid to publicly protest.

“I can understand, yesterday nearly 2,000 protesters were arrested. Really strong people,” she says.

Natalia’s homemade poster has a short message: “Putin to The Hague” - the Netherland city home to the UN’s International Court of Justice. 

“I think he is mad. But, he can’t avoid facing court,” she makes clear. 

 

Natalia and Inna want Russia to stop the military attack on Ukraine. Photo: Thomas Nilsen

 

While Natalia is originally from Russia, her friend Inna is from Ukraine.

“It is absolutely awful, I talk on the phone with friends and family yesterday, at night and in the morning. They are in the northeast region where fighting takes place. Bombs are not only hitting military targets but also civilian water supply and heating systems, so they are there in cold apartments without water,” Inna tells. 

“Putin, please stop the war,” is the message Inna wants to bring to the Russian Consulate General in Kirkenes. During the protest, however, none of the diplomates opened the door.

Several Norwegians also joined the ad-hoc demonstration, among them town council members Pål Gabrielsen and Brede Sæter. 

“We have just proposed to raise the Ukrainian flag outside the Town Hall to show support,” says Gabrielsen, who formerly has been Mayor of the municipality. 

Kirkenes Town Hall is next to Russia’s Consulate General. 

 

Brede Sæter (left) and Pål Gabrielsen are both city town council members. Kirkenes Town Hall in the background. Photo: Thomas Nilsen

 

Kirkenes (Sør-Varanger) municipality has two friendships towns (municipalities) on Russia’s Kola Peninsula. Both home to powerful military assets of the Northern Fleet; Severomorsk and Pechenga. 

“The fact that Putin has started a war against Ukraine puts a kind of another frame to the cooperation and the friendship agreements we have. We have to evaluate and clearly state our opinions,” Pål Gabrielsen says. 

“Our message to Putin is clear. Withdraw the troops, the ongoing war is dangerous for the entire world,” he says. 

 

Photo: Thomas Nilsen

 

The Russian Consulate General in Kirkenes has not made any public statements.

In Moscow, President Vladimir Putin on Friday afternoon said on national TV that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s government is a “band of drug addicts and neo-Nazis that had lodged itself in Kyiv and taken hostage the entire Ukrainian people.”

In Oslo, Foreign Minister Anniken Huitfeldt called in Russian Ambassador Teimuraz Ramishvili on the carpet with a clear message to stop the unprovoked attack on Ukraine’s sovereignty.  

Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre called on Putin to stop the war.

“Norway condemns Russia’s military attack on Ukraine in the strongest possible terms. This attack is a serious violation of international law and will have dramatic consequences for the people of Ukraine,” Støre wrote on Twitter. 

 

Kirkenes has dual language street signs in Norwegian and Russian. Fears of Putin’s totalitarian regime and his war against Ukraine now shatter cross-border ties. Photo: Thomas Nilsen

Russia-Ukraine: Mapping anti-war

protests around the world

Thousands of people in several cities across the globe have taken part in anti-war protests.


By Al Jazeera Staff
Published On 25 Feb 2022

Thousands of people have taken to public squares and Russian embassies across the globe to protest President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

From London and New York to Beirut and Istanbul, demonstrators, some cloaked in Ukrainian flags, have come out in droves to show solidarity with Ukrainians.

The invasion, which took place on Thursday morning, comes after months of rising tensions between Russia, Ukraine, and its Western allies.



As Ukrainians prepare for an assault on the capital Kyiv, hundreds of Russians staged anti-war protests in Moscow, St Petersburg and Nizhny Novgorod, among other cities.

More than 1,745 protesters across 54 cities were arrested on Thursday. Russians have also signed open letters to demand a halt to the attack on Ukraine.
Police officers detain a demonstrator holding a sign reading: ‘I’m against the war’ in Moscow, Russia, February 24, 2022 [Denis Kaminev/AP]

The map and list below shows the locations where sizeable protests have occurred. More protests are planned in the coming days across cities worldwide.

International cities where protests have taken place:


Amsterdam; Athens; Austin; Barcelona; Beirut; Berlin; Bern; Budapest; Chicago; Copenhagen; Denver; Dublin; Edinburgh; Frankfurt; Geneva; Houston; Istanbul; Krakow; London; Madrid; Melbourne; Milan; Naples; New York City; Nice; Oslo; Ottawa; Paris; Prague; Rome; San Francisco; Stockholm; Sydney; Tallinn; Tbilisi; Tel Aviv; The Hague; Tokyo; Turin; Vienna; Vilnius; Warsaw; Washington, DC; Wellington.

Protests have taken place in at least 50 Russian cities including: Chelyabinsk; Moscow; Nizhny Novgorod; Novosibirsk; Perm; Saint Petersburg; Yekaterinburg.
A police officer arrests a woman during a gathering in Saint Petersburg, Russia [Dmitri Lovetsky/AP]
Alexandra Prockow holds up a sign as Ukrainian supporters rally against the attack on Ukraine in Toronto, Canada [Nick Lachance/Reuters
]
People attend a pro-Ukrainian demonstration on Whitehall, near Downing Street, in London, UK [Peter Cziborra/Reuters
]
Demonstrators protest in front of the Austrian foreign affairs ministry in Vienna, Austria against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine [Alex Halada/AFP] 
Protesters attend a rally against Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in Tokyo, Japan [Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters]
SOURCE: AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

Bosnians, remembering their own war,

protest in support of Ukraine

Fri., February 25, 2022



Sarajevans send message of support to Ukraine


SARAJEVO (Reuters) - Bosnians recalled the trauma of their own war as they protested on Friday against Russia's invasion of Ukraine, urging the world to learn the lessons from their experience.

While there have been protests against the conflict in cities across the world - including in Moscow - for activists in Sarajevo, the memories of the 1990s are still raw.

"I cannot be indifferent to this," said Ferida Durakovic, a writer and peace activist who spent the whole war in Sarajevo, which was besieged by Serb forces for 43 months, with 11,000 of its citizens killed in shelling and by sniper fire.

"I've been hit by the PTSD, I see the images of what I've been through ... I need to say - stop, talk, negotiate for years if needed, just don't make war."

She was among dozens protesters who gathered at the monument to the 1,600 children killed in the city, carrying placards reading "Anti-war position is the only Position", "Sarajevo Understands" and "Learn from Sarajevo, Save Kyiv".

The Bosnian war among Serbs, Croats and Muslim Bosniaks, in which 100,000 people died and about 2 million were forced from their homes, has left the country split along ethnic lines and made it dysfunctional and unstable.

WAR IS RAPE
Ajna Jusic, who was born of rape during the war, carried a placard reading "Stop the War, Don't Abandon Ukraine as You Abandoned Bosnia and Herzegovina".

"When I saw the invasion on Ukraine, my blood froze because I know what my mother had been through, what other people had been through, and I still feel the pain and suffering caused by that war," Jusic said.


Jasminko Halilovic, the founder of the War Childhood Museum in Sarajevo, which has a branch in Kyiv documenting memories of children during the years of fighting in eastern Ukraine, said that his staff were trying to leave Ukraine "as we speak".

"I feel terrible - I don't sleep, I am disgusted that something like this is happening in Europe again," Halilovic said, wrapped in the Ukrainian yellow-blue flag.

"I am disappointed in the European Union and its indecisiveness. I think that Ukrainians are not fighting just for themselves, they are fighting for the whole of Europe."

(Reporting by Daria Sito-Sucic; Editing by Alison Williams)

Tearful Ukrainians protest outside

Russian embassy in Cape Town

A small group protested against the Russian invasion of Ukraine, expressing concern about family members who are stuck in the country


25 February 2022 -
BY TIMESLIVE 

A group of Ukrainian citizens protest outside the Russian embassy in Cape Town on February 25 2022. They are calling for a stop to Russia's incursion into Ukraine.
Image: Esa Alexander

Ukrainians and Russians living in Cape Town gathered outside the Russian embassy in the Cape Town city centre to protest against Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

With tears in their eyes they remembered their loved ones in Russia and Ukraine and called for an end to the conflict that has sparked outrage around the world.

They chanted “Stop war! Stop War!” while looking up at the windows of the embassy.

Other protests have been taking place around the world, including the UK and Denmark.


People gather in protest near the Russian embassy in Copenhagen, Denmark, after Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a military operation in eastern Ukraine on Thursday.
Image: Reuters

Nato leaders have condemned the conflict, calling on Russia to leave Ukraine territory.

“This is a blatant violation of international law -an act of aggression against a sovereign, independent and peaceful country and a serious threat to Euro-Atlantic security,” Nato said in a statement.

“We call on Russia to immediately cease its military action, withdraw its forces from Ukraine and choose diplomacy.”

Meanwhile, Russia banned UK airlines from its airspace on Friday.
Putin Suggests Ukrainian Military Seize Power From 'Gang of Junkies, Neo-Nazis in Kiev
Russian President Vladimir Putin  - Sputnik International, 1920, 25.02.2022
The Russian president announced on 24 February the start of a special military operation in Ukraine to defend the Donetsk and Lugansk People's republics (DPR and LPR) from the attacks of the Ukrainian forces.
President Vladimir Putin has addressed the Russian Security Council to discuss the latest updates in the context of the Russian special operation in Ukraine.
Read the full text of his speech:
Good afternoon, dear colleagues!
Today we will discuss the progress of the special military operation in Ukraine.
The main clashes of the Russian Army, as expected, are not taking place with regular units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but with nationalist formations, which, as you know, are directly responsible for the genocide in Donbass and the bloodshed of civilians in the people's republics.
In addition, the nationalist elements embedded in the regular Ukrainian units not only incite them to offer armed resistance, but, in fact, play the role of blocking units.
Moreover, according to the available information, and this is confirmed by the results of objective control, we see that Bandera supporters and neo-Nazis are deploying heavy weapons, including multiple launch rocket systems, right in the central regions of large cities, including Kiev and Kharkov. They plan to provoke return fire from Russian strike systems on residential areas. In fact, they act in the same way as terrorists do around the world, hiding behind people in the hope of later blaming Russia for the civilian casualties.
It is known that all this is happening on the recommendation of foreign instructors, primarily American advisers.
Once again, I appeal to the servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Do not allow neo-Nazis and Bandera supporters to use your children, your wives, and elderly people as human shields. Take power into your own hands. It seems that it will be easier for us to come to an agreement than with this gang of junkies and neo-Nazis, who settled in Kiev and took the entire Ukrainian people hostage.
I also want to give the highest assessment to the actions of Russian soldiers and officers. They act courageously, professionally, heroically, fulfilling their military duty, successfully solving the most important task of ensuring the security of our people and our fatherland.

Putin calls on Ukraine military to seize power to better negotiate with Russia

By Karen Graham
Published February 25, 2022

Russian President Vladimir Putin called on the Ukrainian military to seize power in their country on Friday, a day after Moscow launched an invasion of its southern neighbor.

Speaking during Friday’s meeting of his Security Council, Putin claimed that most Ukrainian military units are reluctant to engage with the Russian forces.

Putin also claimed that the Ukrainian military is made up of right-wing radical nationalists, although he offered no evidence for his claims

“I once again appeal to the military personnel of the armed forces of Ukraine: do not allow neo-Nazis and (Ukrainian radical nationalists) to use your children, wives, and elders as human shields,” Putin said at a televised meeting with Russia’s security council, according to Reuters.

“Take power into your own hands, it will be easier for us to reach an agreement.”

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, tells reporters that Ukrainian officials have stopped responding to Russia’s proposal to hold talks in Belarus, according to the New York Times.

He says Ukrainians are setting up multiple-launch rocket systems in residential neighborhoods in Kyiv and elsewhere. “We believe this situation to be extremely dangerous,” Mr. Peskov said in a hastily arranged call with reporters.

In the meantime, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe is considering whether to suspend Russia as a member, and a decision is due soon, Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said on Friday,

The Council of Europe is separate from the European Union and was formed after the Second World War to protect human rights and the rule of law.

“The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, on the initiative of Ukraine and Poland, launched the procedure for suspending Russia’s membership in the Council of Europe. Final decision coming soon,” Morawiecki wrote on Twitter, reports the Business Standard.

Do protests show Russians don't buy Putin's 'Nazi' Ukraine rhetoric? It's too early to tell

According to Russian officials Ukraine is a threat to Russia and is being run by a clique of Nazi and pro-Western puppets acting on behalf of the oligarchs.


Dominic Waghorn
International Affairs Editor @DominicWaghorn
Friday 25 February 2022
Hundreds protest in St Petersburg to voice their opposition to Putin's invasion of Ukraine

The official version of this war being pushed in Russian state media is it is a special military operation limited to eastern Ukraine and Crimea.

Russian troops moving from the breakaway self-styled people's republics are being welcomed as liberators, say officials.

Ukraine is run by a clique of Nazis and pro-Western puppets in the pocket of oligarchs, say the Russians.

The country needs to be liberated from Nazism and militarism, says foreign minister Sergei Lavrov.

Troops enter Kyiv: follow like Ukraine updates

A spokesperson from Russia's finance ministry told Sky News 'there is a need to resort to such methods' when asked about Ukrainian casualties.

Pretty rich from a government that's just launched possibly the biggest military campaign in Europe since the Second World War.

Do the Russians buy it? It's too early to say.

Certainly not the hundreds if not thousands of brave Russians who came out to protest in more than 50 countries last night.

1:09
Play Video - Moscow: Arrests at anti-war protest

Hundreds of people took to the streets in Russia, condemning Putin's decision to launch an invasion of Ukraine. Over 1,700 anti-war protesters have been arrested across 53 Russian cities.

Only the bravest would dare demonstrate given the government's repressive intolerance of dissent so there will be many more who would have wanted to join them.

They are likely to be reading the truth about this operation from international media.

The majority of Russians though will be receiving the official line from state media that Ukraine is a threat to Russia that requires this special military operation.

Read more: What is happening and where is Ukraine under attack?

Claims Russian troops are being welcomed by Ukrainians as liberators, however fake, will reassure them this is necessary.

Polls so far suggest that Russian sympathy for Ukrainians has reduced since Vladimir Putin recognised the breakaway republics in the Donbas and Russian state-owned media justified it with claims of Ukrainian attacks.

Polls also suggest the majority of Russians blame the current crisis on Kyiv and Washington.

Image:Russian President Vladimir Putin gets animated

As the bigger picture becomes clear, that this is in reality a much larger military operation, it is harder to predict Russian public sentiment.

In particular when Russians start coming home in body bags in considerable numbers.

News of significant numbers of Ukrainian casualties is also likely to reduce public support.

For that reason most analysts have said Putin has only a small window in which to carry out this offensive.

That assumes he cares about public support. His rule has become increasingly autocratic and repressive.

On a war footing his government will have more leeway to crush dissent. Opposition will be condemned as unpatriotic.

The securocratic elite that supports him will become more entrenched in power.

In the short to intermediate term that is likely to secure Putin's grip on power and that may be his primary motive for this action.

But longer term, turning Russia into a pariah state with a weaker and weaker economy damages his legacy and may weaken his chances of securing his future and succession.
Under bombing, Ukraine’s climate scientists withdraw from global meeting

‘It’s not possible because there’s real danger for me and my family,’ says head of delegation.


Ukraine’s delegation withdrew from the IPCC online negotiations as it was forced to hide in bomb shelters | John Macdougall/AFP via Getty Images

BY ZIA WEISE AND KARL MATHIESEN
February 25, 2022 

Russia’s invasion has forced Ukraine’s top climate experts to exit a global scientific meeting finalizing a major report on the impacts of global warming.

Delegates were in the final days of a two-week negotiation on the wording of a summary of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) investigation — due for release on February 28 — into the impacts of climate change on societies and ecosystems around the planet.

But Ukraine’s delegation has had to withdraw from the online negotiations as its members were forced to hide in bomb shelters.

Svitlana Krakovska, a climate scientist who heads the Ukrainian delegation, said she informed the IPCC they had to withdraw on Thursday, in part due to a lack of internet access.

“We have some delegates from other cities, not only Kyiv, and they were forced to go to shelters,” she said. “But most important is that it’s very difficult to think about climate change impacts when you have impacts of Russian missiles in our Kyiv, and tanks everywhere.”

Krakovska, who lives in the Ukrainian capital with her four children, said she tried to continue working.

“But then I just realized that it's not possible because there’s real danger for me and my family, and all our delegates,” she said.

This latest cycle of IPCC reports marks the first time Ukrainians are involved as lead authors, so withdrawing now felt “not fair,” she said.

It was also bitter for Krakovska to consider that, in her mind, the drivers of the war and climate change were the same.

“There’s this connection … all the money for this aggression comes from oil, from fossil fuels. The more we use this, the more we sponsor this aggression,” she said.

Meanwhile, Russian climate diplomats have used the meeting to downplay the warnings of the IPCC report.

According to two people with knowledge of the process, Russia's delegates have repeatedly tried to insert mentions of the benefits of global warming, including new opportunities for resource extraction and shipping, and positive impacts on agriculture in Russia’s Arctic areas.

Russia's pushback is not unusual compared to past behavior at the IPCC. But one person involved in the negotiations said: “What we saw was a much more concerted effort. That seems to be much more politically driven to emphasize these opportunities."

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond to a request for comment.

In an open letter on Tuesday, around 650 Russian scientists — including dozens from the government-chartered Russian Academy of Sciences — condemned the war and said the invasion has turned Russia into a “pariah,” with consequences for the pursuit of knowledge in that country.

“After all, conducting scientific research is unthinkable without full cooperation with colleagues from other countries. The isolation of Russia from the world means further cultural and technological degradation of our country in the complete absence of positive prospects. War with Ukraine is a step to nowhere,” the letter said.

The IPCC reports, which are published roughly every seven years, are the authoritative summary of the state of climate science and are designed to help guide public policy.

Negotiations at the IPCC are expected to wrap up on Friday, but were only 55 percent completed at the time of publication. Delegates said they expected talks to run over.

First climate risk insurance payout in Mali helps WFP provide early response to climate-affected families

BAMAKO –The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) welcomes a US$ 7.1 million climate risk insurance payment from the African Risk Capacity, ARC-Replica to help support 204,000 people in drought-affected regions of Mali including Bandiagara, Gao, Kayes and Segou.

With a population already struggling with the effects of persistent conflicts, political instability, and the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19, this first-ever climate risk insurance payment in Mali will help WFP provide emergency and resilience-building support in a timely manner to those most vulnerable to climate extremes from March to May 2022. WFP’s response will complement that of the Government of Mali which will also receive insurance compensation from ARC-Replica for climate shocks. Both WFP and government response plans have been prepared jointly and will be implemented in a coordinated manner to achieve impactful results

"The impact of poor rains is clearly visible in affected communities and could prove devastating for many families. Cereal production has decreased, and pasture and water for livestock has shrunk, forcing people to sell off their livestock” said Sally Haydock, WFP’s Country Director and Representative. 

“This payout comes at a vital time - helping families adapt to most severe impacts of climate change and preserve their livelihoods” she added.

WFP’s support will complement the Government of Mali’s response which will also receive insurance compensation from ARC-Replica for climate shocks. Both WFP and government response plans have been prepared jointly and will be implemented in a coordinated manner to achieve impactful results.

In 2021, Mali experienced the most severe lack of rains in five years caused by periodic dry spells and low rainfall, all of which have compromised the country's agricultural output, putting 1.9 million people across the country at risk of severe food insecurity - mostly in the regions of Kayes, Gao, Mopti, Segou, and Timbuktu. 

"ARC Replica is a valuable programme that complements and supports the efforts of the Malian Government in the fight against food insecurity and malnutrition. The government strategy is to provide half rations to populations in food crisis situations to contribute to national solidarity. Our common interest is to always work together to relieve the populations affected by drought and strengthen their resilience to climate shocks, with innovative solutions such as those offered by the ARC mutual insurance company," affirmed Mrs. DICKO Bassa Diane, Deputy Minister Commissioner of the Food security council.

With this climate insurance payment, WFP will provide early food assistance through cash transfers to 161,000 women, men and children affected by climate shocks. Over 20,000 children aged from 6 to 23 months, and pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers will receive nutritional support and services. To reinforce communities’ resilience to climate shocks, 23,000 people will benefit from community asset building programmes such as pastoral wells, water towers and fishponds that will help diversify their production and livelihoods and reduce the impact of future rains deficiencies.

Established to help governments improve their capacities to plan, prepare and respond to natural disasters caused by extreme weather events, ARC-replica is an innovative approach to climate risk management which allows countries - like Mali - to extend their climate insurance coverage to more vulnerable people in their countries.

As an ARC-Replica technical partner, WFP uses the ARC insurance funds to improve its emergency and resilience-building response as it offers more flexibility for early emergency response than regular humanitarian funding systems. In collaboration with ARC, WFP will continue strengthening the technical and operational capacities of the Government of Mali in managing and preventing food insecurity and malnutrition caused by climate shocks. 

In Mali, WFP has been subscribing to the climate insurance policy since 2017 to finance early response in case of drought. In 2021, WFP’s insurance premium was funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Government of Germany.    

 

#                 #                   #

 

The United Nations World Food Programme is the world’s largest humanitarian organization, saving lives in emergencies and using food assistance to build a pathway to peace, stability and prosperity for people recovering from conflict, disasters and the impact of climate change

‘Pure Orwell’: how Russian state media spins invasion as liberation

State propaganda mobilised to sooth public’s deep unease over incursion into Ukraine
A man clears debris at a damaged residential building in a suburb of Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital.
 Photograph: Daniel Leal/AFP/Getty Images

Pjotr Sauer in Moscow
Fri 25 Feb 2022 

Turn on Russian state television on Friday afternoon and you will see little sign that the country’s missiles are pounding the Ukrainian capital.

Instead, the full force of the state propaganda machine has been mobilised to portray Moscow’s invasion as a defensive campaign to “liberate” Ukraine, focusing much of its coverage on the alleged protection of the Donbas, supposedly under attack by Kyiv.


“Our situation is very concerning. The enemy is attacking our positions, entering civilian houses,” said Leonid Pasechnik, the leader of the self-proclaimed republic in Luhansk, to the Rossiya-24 channel.


RT news channel in spotlight in UK over pro-Russia slant on Ukraine crisis


A breaking news banner on Channel One said that “Ukraine launched three missiles at the Donetsk People’s Republic in the last seven minutes”.

The Russian state news mostly follows Vladimir Putin’s narrative on the war, which he laid out in his address to the nation early on Thursday morning when he announced a limited “special military operation” to “demilitarise” Ukraine and protect citizens in the Donbas from what he claimed was a Ukrainian “genocide”.

Throughout Friday morning, a Russian assault on the Ukrainian capital was often simply denied.

“Kyiv, as a city where civilians live, hasn’t been bombed by anyone. There hasn’t been any terror there or instructions to cause such terror,” said the Channel One pundit Artyom Sheinin on Friday, contradicting the myriad of reports that have shown the opposite.

As it becomes harder for state media to ignore the full-scale invasion into Ukrainian territory, some channels have started to frame Russian soldiers as eagerly anticipated liberators.

“The people in the city Kharkiv only have one issue with the Russian army: ‘What took you so long?’” said Olga Skabeyeva, one of the country’s most prominent state television hosts.

Coverage of the invasion contrasts steeply with that of other Russian military campaigns. During Russia’s 2015 military intervention in Syria, viewers were often treated to flashy videos of fighter jets destroying their targets. The avoidance of such videos this time serves as a sign that Russian authorities are aware of the country’s deep unease with the conflict.

Television remains the biggest news source for Russians despite becoming less trusted over the past decade, past polling has found, and 62% of the population say they get their news from television. But polls also show that most people under 40 prefer to get their news online and from social media.

Despite a state crackdown on Russian media, readers can still choose from several independent outlets that have been reporting critically on the country’s involvement in the war, including the popular online platform Meduza and the television channel Dozhd – both recently branded as “foreign agents”.

Those who can read English are still able to access foreign press, and there are also many popular independent Telegram channels run by journalists turned bloggers.

In contrast to WhatsApp, the widely used encrypted messaging app Telegram allows readers to “follow” users in a similar way to Twitter, which is accessed by only 3% of the population. Alexei Pivovarov, a veteran Russian journalist, runs a channel with almost 500,000 followers, aggregating independent news on the war coming from Russia, Ukraine and the west.

Other channels are more opinionated. Commenting on a recent statement by the Kremlin official Valentina Matviyenko, who defended the invasion by saying it “was is the only option to stop a brotherly war”, the Telegram user Stalingulag wrote to his 300,000 followers: “This is pure Orwell, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery.”

Signs are emerging that the Kremlin will try to gain a monopoly on the way Russians perceive events in Ukraine by censoring independent outlets reporting on the war.

On Thursday Russia’s media watchdog, Roskomnadzor, demanded that Russian media cite only “official information and data” when covering the conflict. The watchdog vowed to immediately block outlets that did not comply with the order.

In a similar move, Russia previously threatened to block at least 10 news outlets unless they deleted their coverage of video investigations by the jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny into high-level corruption. Most outlets gave in to the demands.

Over at the state broadcaster RT – which has parroted many of the themes on the war that were aired on Russian state television – the first signs have emerged that its staff are uncomfortable with the network’s war coverage.

At least one English-language RT staff member and one frequent RT contributor in Moscow have quit the network in recent days over the editorial position on the war, the Guardian has learned.

“In light of recent events, earlier today I resigned from RT with immediate effect,” the former RT staff news writer in Moscow Jonny Tickle tweeted on Thursday.

The frequent RT contributor who resigned said, on condition of anonymity, that there had “been an exodus of staff already” at the channel.

“Several people already quit – and lots more said to be contemplating.”

Russian state media denies its military attacked Kyiv and even claims Ukraine shot down its own plane there
Damage to a building in Kyiv Ukraine, on the morning of February 25, 2022. Russia insisted it was not attacking the city.
 Pierre Crom/Getty Images

Russia's invasion of Ukraine brought fighting to the streets of its capital city, Kyiv.

But Russian state media was at pains to avoid that fact, and sometimes denied it.

Insider's review of outlets found a common narrative that obscured the realities of the conflict.

On Thursday and into Friday it was clear to most people around the world that Russia had invaded Ukraine, and moved quickly to attack its capital, Kyiv.

Explosions were reported in the city of 2.8 million as its residents huddled in bomb shelters.

Videos showed Russian helicopters bombarding an airfield and gunfire in Kyiv's outskirts.

Ukrainian soldiers at a checkpoint in Kyiv, Ukraine, on February 25, 2022.
 Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images

But those receiving their news from Russia's vast array of state media outlets were given no sense of this, according to a review by Insider and other monitors.


Here is a selection of stories from the front pages of major Russian outlets in the early afternoon of Friday, the second day of hostilities around Kyiv.

They had a common theme: Russia is winning, Ukraine is planning atrocities, and there are no Russian attacks on Kyiv.

The prominent RIA Novosti agency followed that narrative on Friday morning.

News coverage from Russia's RIA Novosti agency on February 25, 2022. Its top story reports the claim that damage in Kyiv was from Ukraine's military shooting down its own plane. RIA Novosti

It reported a claim that more than 150 Ukrainian soldiers had surrendered, including 82 on Zmiinyi Island in the Black Sea. (Ukraine said that its troops refused to surrender and died fighting. Audio appeared to show the outgunned soldiers telling a warship to "go fuck yourself.")

RIA also noted Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky's request for peace negotiations with Russia, though without the context of attacks on Kyiv. It also aired the outlandish claim that Ukraine was trying to develop nuclear weapons, for which there is no evidence, but which Russia also cited to justify its attack.

'Shot down its own jet'

One prominent story was about Kyiv — but claimed that the damage to buildings there was from Ukraine accidentally shooting down one of its own fighter jets. The story cited an unnamed Russian defense source, who also said Russia was not attacking Kyiv.

The Interfax agency had a similar approach. Its top story was an official denial that Russia was attacking Kyiv, which also reported that Ukraine had shot down its own plane by mistake.

Russia's military, on the other hand, was reported to have destroyed 11 Ukrainian air fields and a naval base. Its choice for "photo of the week" was not to do with the war, but a wildlife image of cranes in China at sundown.


The TASS agency, which publishes in both English and Russian, also carried the claim about the plane being shot down.

A headline from the TASS state news agency on February 25, 2022. TASS

The agency also reported on a speech by Zelensky lamenting that Ukraine was left to face Russia by itself — but omitted anything Zelensky said about strikes on Kyiv.

It wrote instead that Russia said its forces were "not targeting Ukrainian cities, but are limited to surgically striking and incapacitating Ukrainian military infrastructure. There are no threats whatsoever to the civilian population."

A telling moment on Friday morning on Russia's Channel 1 appeared to show the difficulty of maintaining such a position.

Francis Scarr, a BBC employee in Moscow, described a brief conflict between a guest and host on the news show "Time Will Tell."

Per Scarr's translation, host Vladislav Shurygin began to describe videos of Russian shelling in Kyiv, arguing that it was necessary despite the evident suffering among the people there.

But the host, Artynom Sheynin, interrupted, telling him that there was in fact no suffering.

"Because Kyiv," he said, "as a city where civilians live, hasn't been bombed by anyone."

Although Russia's system of state media outlets is large and influential, there are many other ways for Russians to find news, including homegrown independent outlets and foreign press.

Large protests against the war erupted on Thursday, prompting mass arrests. Celebrities and other public figures also spoke out against the war, despite the risk of censure.

The other front in Putin’s Ukraine invasion: online disinformation

Digital disinformation has long been a favorite tactic of the Kremlin’s and the Ukraine crisis is proving to be no exception.

By Brian Contreras
The Los Angeles Times
Fri., Feb. 25, 2022

As Russian bombs and cruise missiles rocked cities across Ukraine early Thursday morning, another front in the long-simmering conflict was erupting. The internet quickly became a battlefield in its own right, with propaganda and disinformation threatening to muddy the water for Americans following the crisis from afar.

Digital disinformation has long been a favorite tactic of the Kremlin’s — as Americans learned via the proliferation of “fake news” during the 2016 presidential election — and the Ukraine crisis is proving to be no exception. Over the last few days, researchers have warned that President Vladimir Putin’s regime is pushing, and will continue to push, false narratives aimed at justifying its aggression.

At least some of those narratives are finding purchase among an American public divided by previous waves of disinformation, said Graham Brookie, senior director of the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab. “What we see … is not an insignificant amount of organic audience engagement from U.S. citizens that are predisposed to have their previously held beliefs reinforced by Russian disinformation.”

For instance, he said, anti-vaccine groups that are already skeptical of the U.S. government are now primed to disbelieve the official U.S. government narrative around Ukraine.

Russian “influence operations” relying on disinformation “exist at a steady state,” and have for years, added Brookie, but the ramp-up to war in Ukraine has brought “a massive surge.”

Jennifer Granston, head of insights at the social media analytics firm Zignal Labs, said the conspiracy theory that the Ukraine conflict is a government-manufactured distraction from supposed harms of COVID-19 vaccines is one of the disinformation narratives her company has monitored in recent days, along with the claim, embraced by a Russian state media outlet, that the invasion is a mere “peacekeeping mission.”

Reaction to Russia-backed propaganda has been mixed. Even among far-right groups that have in the past been sympathetic toward Putin — a strongman leader whom former U.S. President Trump often praised — the complexities of the present moment have left some split in their loyalties.

“The online far-right space is rather confusing right now,” said Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism. “Some commenters on fringe sites are securely pro-Putin, and are attacking NATO and the idea that any intervention should happen in Ukraine. I’ve even seen posts asking that Putin invade the U.S. and spare us from Biden.”

“But the conversation is pretty complex and wide ranging,” she added via email. “There are also posts on Telegram supported by American white supremacists trying to recruit for the Azov Battalion” — a neo-Nazi unit in the Ukrainian military.

Daniel J. Jones, president of the nonprofit research group Advance Democracy, noted a similar dynamic. Historically, he said, American fringe groups have helped spread Russian misinformation, and Russia has amplified “homegrown” American misinformation in turn.

But that interplay has been upended by the current Ukraine crisis. “Most of the U.S. right-wing groups and platforms we monitor are claiming that the invasion would never have happened under former President Trump,” Jones said over text message; some such groups even claim the crisis was manufactured by Biden “to distract from his ‘corruption’ and poll numbers.”

Regardless of how the conflict is received by Americans, Putin’s first priority is controlling information within his own country, said Brookie, the director of the digital forensics lab. He called Putin’s recent speech about Ukraine a “tour de force of historical revisionism … focused on shoring up support, or at least making a show of shoring up support, to the Russian people.”

To disseminate his preferred narratives across the social internet, Putin relies heavily on content produced by state-affiliated media outlets RT and Sputnik. In 2017 testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Clint Watts, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, said false news stories and conspiracy theories originally reported by RT and Sputnik were frequently amplified by sites such as Breitbart and InfoWars, filtering from there into the broader conservative media ecosystem.

RT was all-in on Ukraine coverage Thursday. “War in Ukraine started 8 years ago, Russia is now ending it, Moscow claims,” read one headline. On Facebook, where it has more than 7 million followers, the outlet posted a 26-second video with the caption, “Putin on military operation: ‘What is happening is a necessary measure, we were left no other option.’”

While RT may look like a slick broadcast channel, it’s closer in spirit to the Soviet-era newspaper Pravda, some observers said. Facebook, Twitter and YouTube all label it as state-controlled media.

“It is definitely the mouthpiece of the Russian government,” said Kathryn Stoner, a Stanford University political science professor and author of “Russia Resurrected: Its Power and Purpose in a New Global Order.”

This week the National Broadcasting Council in Poland adopted a resolution to remove Russian channels, including RT, from its register. A United Kingdom official also expressed concern that RT would spread “harmful disinformation” about the Ukraine crisis, according to Reuters.

The outlet did not respond to a request for comment from The Times.

“We’re in a moment of new media disruption, where the world is getting used to social media channels and this has been very much exploited by Kremlin media working to confuse the situation,” said Nicholas Cull, a professor of public diplomacy at USC, during a Thursday panel discussion on the information war in Ukraine. “I am struck by how unready the U.S. government is for an information war with the Russians.”