Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Shireen Abu Akleh. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Shireen Abu Akleh. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, June 02, 2022

GLOBAL SOLIDARITY FREE PALESTINE
Edmonton mass honours journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

Hamdi Issawi - Yesterday 
Edmonton Journal


A memorial mass in Edmonton for a journalist killed in the occupied West Bank celebrated the life of a woman whose coverage cast a light on the Palestinian people.

© Provided by Edmonton Journal
Members of the Canada Palestine Cultural Association hold a memorial mass for Shireen Abu Akleh, at Our Lady of Help Maronite Church, 9805 76 Ave., in Edmonton Sunday May 29, 2022. Abu Akleh, a journalist with Al Jazeera, was shot and killed while covering a May 11, 2022 Israeli army raid in the city of Jenin, in the occupied West Bank of Palestine.

On Sunday, the Canada Palestine Cultural Association organized a service for Shireen Abu Akleh, a dual Palestinian-American national and Al Jazeera reporter who died May 11 while on assignment in Jenin, a northern city in the occupied West Bank.

Joe Hak, founder and former president of the World Lebanon Cultural Union, was one of the organizers of the mass at Our Lady of Good Help, a Maronite Catholic church in Edmonton’s Ritchie neighbourhood. While it was a sombre affair, he said, there was also a deep sense of pride for Abu Akleh and her work.

“She was a household name all over the world,” Hak said, “and particularly in the Arab world — carrying on her role as a journalist to report about the kinds of suffering, brutalities and atrocities committed against the Palestinians.”

Citing witnesses and the Palestinian health ministry, Al Jazeera reported that Abu Akleh, 51, was covering Israeli military raids in Jenin when she was shot dead by Israeli forces despite wearing a clearly marked “press” vest and standing among other journalists garbed in the same.


© David Bloom
Monsignor Sayed Kozhaya is highlighted by sunlight as he takes part in a memorial mass for Shireen Abu Akleh, at Our Lady of Help Maronite Church, 9805 76 Ave., in Edmonton Sunday May 29, 2022. Abu Akleh, a journalist with Al Jazeera, was shot and killed while covering a May 11, 2022 Israeli army raid in the city of Jenin, in the occupied West Bank of Palestine.


Israel’s government initially suggested Palestinian fire might have been to blame, but officials have also said they could not rule out it was Israeli gunfire that killed her. Witnesses told Al Jazeera there had been no confrontations between Palestinian fighters and the Israeli army at the time.

Abu Akleh covered Palestinian affairs and the Middle East for more than 20 years, Al Jazeera wrote, and colleagues and acquaintances described her as a “real journalist” as well as a voice for Palestinians.

“We wanted people to know who she was,” Hak added, “and we wanted to give her the honour she deserves.”

— With files from Reuters

hissawi@postmedia.com

@hamdiissawi


© David Bloom
Sourly Karam holds a rosary as she takes part in a memorial mass for Shireen Abu Akleh, at Our Lady of Help Maronite Church, 9805 76 Ave., in Edmonton Sunday May 29, 2022. Abu Akleh, a journalist with Al Jazeera, was shot and killed while covering a May 11, 2022 Israeli army raid in the city of Jenin, in the occupied West Bank of Palestine.


© David Bloom
Randa Alhijawi, president of the Canada Palestine Cultural Association, holds a Palestinian flag as she takes part in a memorial mass for Shireen Abu Akleh, at Our Lady of Help Maronite Church, 9805 76 Ave., in Edmonton Sunday May 29, 2022. Abu Akleh, a journalist with Al Jazeera, was shot and killed while covering a May 11, 2022 Israeli army raid in the city of Jenin, in the occupied West Bank of Palestine.


© David Bloom
Sourly Karam holds a green rosary as she takes part in a memorial mass for Shireen Abu Akleh, at Our Lady of Help Maronite Church, 9805 76 Ave., in Edmonton Sunday May 29, 2022. Abu Akleh, a journalist with Al Jazeera, was shot and killed while covering a May 11, 2022 Israeli army raid in the city of Jenin, in the occupied West Bank of Palestine.


Sunday, June 12, 2022

Shireen Abu Akleh, one month on: ‘The days have not passed’

Journalists at the scene of the Al Jazeera reporter’s killing on May 11 remain in shock and trauma.

Palestinian protesters hold candles and a photo of slain Al Jazeera journalist 
Shireen Abu Akleh on May 11, 2022 [File: Ariel Schalit/AP Photo]

By Zena Al Tahhan
Published On 11 Jun 2022

The image of Shireen Abu Akleh’s lifeless body lying face down on the ground has not left cameraman Majdi Bannoura’s mind.

Bannoura was only a few metres away when Abu Akleh was killed by Israeli forces in Jenin a month ago, on May 11. As her cameraman, and as difficult as it was, he knew that he had to film what he was witnessing.

A month later, Bannoura, who works for Al Jazeera and had a 24-year professional and personal relationship with Abu Akleh, is still in a state of shock.

“We still cannot believe that she’s gone, that we haven’t seen her for a month. We walk into the office hoping to hear her voice,” he said.

The killing of the 51-year-old veteran Palestinian correspondent for Al Jazeera Arabic television has sent shockwaves throughout the world.

Abu Akleh, who also held American citizenship, was shot in the head while covering an Israeli army raid on the Jenin refugee camp, in the northern occupied West Bank, despite wearing a clearly marked press vest and helmet.

Al Jazeera described Abu Akleh’s death as “blatant murder” and said she was “assassinated in cold blood”. The network has assigned a legal team to refer her killing to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.



‘Much more than a colleague’


Abu Akleh joined Al Jazeera Arabic at the same time as Bannoura, in August 1997, a year after the network was launched. Back then, Bannoura filmed her first-ever appearance on camera with the channel in Jerusalem.

He also filmed her last, when she was transformed from a reporter into the story itself.

Upon hearing the first bullet, Bannoura began recording. He saw that his colleague, Ali al-Samoudi (who has now recovered), had been shot.

“Ali was injured and I started filming him, I didn’t see Shireen and I wasn’t aware of the size of the tragedy we were in,” he recalled.

“When I turned the camera towards Shireen, I saw her lying on the ground. I wanted to cross the street, but there was live ammunition being fired at us. I realised that the situation was very dangerous – that if I went out, I was going to get shot,” said Bannoura.

“I wasn’t processing what was happening, I made a decision within seconds to keep filming.”

Bannoura kept his eyes on Shireen’s body as he filmed, hoping he would see any sign of life, but to no avail. By the time she was dragged away and taken to a hospital, she was already dead.

Losing her, said Bannoura, has had a difficult and lasting effect on his life.

“Shireen was much more than a colleague, she was a friend to everyone, we had a lifelong relationship beyond just work,” he said between tears.

“She would come over, she knew my children. We spent more time together than we would spend in our own homes. It’s not going to get easier, whether a month or two months, or a year or two years, pass.”

‘An honour’

While Abu Akleh’s killing will continue to make headlines as calls for justice and accountability persist, those who were next to her at the scene are still reliving the trauma and horror of the event.

Local journalist Mujahed al-Saadi was standing next to Abu Akleh when she was shot. He says that he feels time has stopped

.
A protestor holds photo of slain Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh on May 15 in the Bay Ridge neighbourhood of the Brooklyn borough of New York City in May [Alex Kent/Getty Images]

“The days have not passed. I wake up at night to the image of Shireen’s last moments, it stays in my mind,” al-Saadi told Al Jazeera.

Despite being in the direct line of fire himself, al-Saadi wishes he could have done more for Abu Akleh.

“I sometimes feel guilty that I, a son of the area, could not protect Shireen. I did not expect her to be martyred – I thought that I would be the one to die as I was in front of her, closer to the soldiers,” al-Saadi said.

“I went crazy because I felt that the bullets were intended for me,” he added.

Abu Akleh often conducted her television live broadcasts from the rooftop of al-Saadi’s home, and he accompanied her in the field on many occasions, particularly in the camp.

The father of two said working with her – after growing up watching her on TV – was an “honour”.

“Many people dreamt of merely getting the chance to speak to her, let alone work with her,” said al-Saadi, noting her coverage of Israel’s 2002 large-scale invasion of the Jenin refugee camp where he used to live.

“What shocked me the most when I started working with her was her modesty, despite how well known she was. She was patriotic. She was loved by the people.”

Abu Akleh’s funeral procession extended over three days, from Jenin to Jerusalem – one of the longest processions in Palestinian history – and included Nablus and Ramallah. That, said al-Saadi, was indicative of the respect for her among regular Palestinians who flooded into the streets to bid her farewell.

For al-Saadi and Bannoura, the chances of justice for Abu Akleh feel slim owing to the reality of rampant Israeli impunity.

“We have never seen any justice – from any international side or court. Even if we are journalists, we are Palestinians at the end of the day,” said Bannoura, adding that any Palestinian is liable to be targeted.

“We hope that Shireen’s case will be the moment that will change things moving forward.”

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

KEEP READING



Tuesday, December 27, 2022

‘An empty seat at the table’: Christmas without Shireen Abu Akleh

She was a renowned journalist, but to her niece, Shireen was a Christmas-loving aunt and the ‘backbone’ of the family.

Shireen Abu Akleh loved Christmas, says her niece Lina [Al Jazeera]
By Annette Ekin
Published On 24 Dec 2022

Each year, as Christmas approached, Lina Abu Akleh would look forward to spending time with her aunt.

Lina and her siblings – an older brother and a younger sister – would get together with their parents and their father’s younger sister at the family home in occupied East Jerusalem, where they’d enjoy a big Christmas lunch.

But this year, it is a day 27-year-old Lina is dreading.

That is because on May 11, Lina’s aunt, the 51-year-old veteran television correspondent, Shireen Abu Akleh, was shot dead by Israeli forces. She and other journalists – all dressed in protective helmets and blue flak jackets marked “Press” – were fired upon as they walked down a road in the occupied West Bank city of Jenin.

Her killing sent shockwaves around the world. The Palestinian-American correspondent, who worked with Al Jazeera for 25 years, was known to be a careful, dedicated journalist whose compassionate reporting centred on the voices and stories of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation.

That morning in May, Lina, who is campaigning for justice for Abu Akleh, did not only lose a beloved aunt but a “second mother” to her and her siblings. Abu Akleh was always there, “a backbone to our family,” she says.

“It was just my parents, my siblings and Shireen,” Lina adds.

“Not having her around, especially during Christmas will be very difficult … There will be an empty seat around the table.”

Abu Akleh’s family gathered for Christmas in 2019 
[Courtesy of the Abu Akleh family]

‘Enjoyed Christmas’

It is a Sunday evening in early December, and Lina is sitting in the ground-floor café of a hotel in the Dutch city of The Hague on the North Sea. The space is filled with the low chatter of diners and the tinkling of cutlery and glasses. A screen behind Lina displays a crackling log fire and a large Christmas tree stands by the hotel entrance.

December was traditionally a “happy month” when Abu Akleh could take a break from her busy job to spend time with Lina and her siblings who were often studying or working abroad during the year.

“She really enjoyed Christmas,” says Lina. They would often put up the family tree together and Abu Akleh loved the Ramallah Christmas markets, whose local vendors she liked to support.

Abu Akleh always thought of gifts for everyone, even her small fluffy white dog Filfel, named so in Arabic because like pepper he was “spicey” and always moving. One Christmas, Abu Akleh wrapped a crocodile-shaped squeaky toy and placed it under the tree. “He knew that it was his,” Lina recalls laughing. “And I remember we were laughing about it so much because she was just amazed. She’s like, ‘How did he know that it was his gift?’”

Shireen Abu Akleh holds Filfel in 2019 [Courtesy of the Abu Akleh family]


‘These were our traditions’

Many of Lina’s memories of Christmases with Abu Akleh are connected to food – something “Shireen loved”. On Christmas Eve, the family would have dinner at a restaurant in Ramallah with carols or some other festive entertainment, and then the next morning Lina’s mother would start to prepare lunch – a “feast”.

There would be warak dawali – stuffed grape leaves – and Lina’s mother, who is Armenian and whose parents once had a bakery specialising in lahmajoun (a flatbread with meat) in Jerusalem’s Armenian quarter, would make dishes like soubeureg – a time-consuming layered pastry made with homemade boiled dough “filled with cheese, parsley, and a lot of butter”.

“She always loved Armenian foods, especially my mom’s,” Lina explains.

Abu Akleh would come to the kitchen to help out. “But she would also be nibbling here and there, tasting the food. Like I can just picture her now walking around the kitchen,” recalls Lina smiling, before adding that her aunt would make a gesture of rubbing her hands together to show she was “excited to eat”.

“These were our traditions – nothing fancy – but it was still something we looked forward to,” says Lina of the family meals and pictures taken in front of the tree.

Lina shows a photo on her phone of a smiling Abu Akleh standing in front of the Christmas tree one year as she holds Filfel who is dressed in a green and red jumper with “Merry Christmas” and a candy cane on it.


“I’m dreading it because I will not be waking up to her Merry Christmas wishes,” says Lina, before repeating those words in Arabic in the melodic way that her aunt would say them – with a big smile on her face and her head tilted to one side.

Christmas lunch at home included some of Abu Akleh’s favourite dishes such as her sister-in-law’s pudding, left, made from amardeen, an apricot paste [Courtesy of the Abu Akleh family]


‘Find the silver lining’

Lina smiles often when she talks about her aunt, with whom she would speak or message daily. “We had a very close connection,” she says.

Abu Akleh was a household name in the Arab world in which many grew up hearing her legendary sign-off. “It was the iconic sign-off that I think generations grew up trying to imitate,” explains Lina. As a child, she would take her aunt’s notebooks and run to sit at her Lego table and “report”, signing off with her Barbie phone: “Lina Abu Akleh, Al Jazeera, Palestine.”

For Lina, her aunt was accomplished, poised and brave. “I wanted to be like Shireen. To me, she was my role model.”

Despite her serious on-camera persona, Lina says her aunt was funny – and “fun to be around.”

Abu Akleh always had stories to share and even after a whole day of reporting and speaking to people, she was always interested in hearing what Lina and her siblings had been up to.


Lina rarely saw her aunt tense or angry and remembers her as “always smiling” and down-to-earth. “She would always find the silver lining in every situation and try to be optimistic.”

Still, Lina and her family worried about Abu Akleh – when she was pushed by Israeli forces last year while covering forced expulsions of Palestinians and the crackdowns on protesters at Al-Aqsa Mosque, endured tear gas or was harassed by settlers.

But she always reassured them, “’No, we are journalists, don’t worry,’ even though she knew deep down that at some point they are targets,” recounts Lina.

During tense periods of the Israel-Palestine conflict, seeing her aunt live on television would reassure Lina that she was safe.

“I never thought that she would get killed,” she says.

On the morning of May 11, Lina’s father called to tell her Abu Akleh had been injured. She called her colleagues to get more information and learned she had been shot. Still, Lina didn’t think it was anything too serious. “My mom was like, pray, pray. And she started lighting all these candles around the house.” Then, a couple of minutes later, Lina called Abu Akleh’s colleague back to hear them sobbing and screaming. “That’s when I knew,” she says.

Speaking nearly seven months after Abu Akleh’s death, the shock is still raw. “I still feel like I’m in this nightmare. And it’s just not ending,” she acknowledges.

“She was so present in our lives that for us to lose her in this sudden and heinous way makes it so difficult to comprehend.”



Fighting for justice


Israel has changed its narrative on the killing of Abu Akleh, initially blaming a Palestinian gunman, before months later saying there is a “high possibility” the journalist was “accidentally hit” by Israeli fire. The Israeli authorities have said they will not launch a criminal investigation.

In September, Abu Akleh’s family submitted a complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC), while Lina and her father along with former colleagues came to The Hague in December for Al Jazeera’s submission of a formal request to the ICC to investigate the killing.

But Lina, who has become the face of this campaign for accountability, is still learning how to navigate a public fight alongside her personal grief. “It hasn’t been easy to fully sit with my feelings and reflect back on the past six months and understand how this tragedy has shaped our lives,” she reflects.


What keeps her going is knowing that had it been another family member, friend or colleague, Abu Akleh would have tirelessly fought for justice. “She was optimistic, always, that justice will prevail.”

Lina also wants to constantly remind the world who Abu Akleh was and “make sure her legacy continues to be remembered, her name is remembered, her memory’s alive.”

Lina carries her aunt’s small gold hoop earrings wherever she goes. Wearing Abu Akleh’s earrings makes Lina ‘feel like I’m close to her’ [Olivier Douliery/AFP]

‘Enjoy life’

For Lina, keeping her aunt’s memory alive is also about remembering her optimism.

Even now, she believes her aunt would want her to be enjoying her life – something Lina has struggled with. “I would feel guilty if I’m doing something fun,” she admits. Lina wore black as a sign of mourning for six months and still often does. “It’s very difficult. But I try to always remember her words telling me … enjoy life.”

“Everything I do in life now reminds me of her,” she says, explaining how her aunt would have been the first person to text her after she arrived in The Hague. She loved turning on her phone after a flight to find texts from Abu Akleh, who was always excited to hear what she was doing and tell her to send pictures. “She’s no longer part of my journey,” Lina says.

“Regardless of how difficult and demanding her job was, she was there, for every occasion, every milestone, every birthday, every celebration – she was present.”

 


Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Shireen Abu Akleh was ‘shot dead in targeted attack’ by Israel, CNN investigation concludes

CNN investigates th
e killing of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh on May 11 and says she was targeted by Israeli sniper positioned 600 feet away from her with a clear line of sight.
SHIREEN ABU AKLEH (SOCIAL MEDIA)

Today CNN published its own investigation of the killing of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh on May 11, and it says that new eyewitnesses, videos and ballistic analysis bear out what Abu Akleh’s colleagues said that day: The AlJazeera correspondent was targeted by an Israeli sniper positioned about 600 feet away from her with a clear line of sight.

CNN’s team of six journalists writes:

[A]n investigation by CNN offers new evidence — including two videos of the scene of the shooting — that there was no active combat, nor any Palestinian militants, near Abu Akleh in the moments leading up to her death. Videos obtained by CNN, corroborated by testimony from eight eyewitnesses, an audio forensic analyst and an explosive weapons expert, suggest that Abu Akleh was shot dead in a targeted attack by Israeli forces.

CNN’s devastating report shows the media are not dropping the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh, even if the Israeli government is. Hopefully this will bring added pressure on the U.S. government to investigate the case on its own, as 57 Congresspeople have urged it to do, and demand accountability for the killing.

The new investigation, which follows on similar forensic analyses by Bellingcat and B’Tselem, supports the assertions of journalist eyewitnesses, in the face of Israeli denials.

All of the journalists were wearing protective blue vests that identified them as members of the news media. ​

“We stood in front of the Israeli military vehicles for about five to ten minutes before we made moves to ensure they saw us. And this is a habit of ours as journalists, we move as a group and we stand in front of them so they know we are journalists, and then we start moving,” [reporter Shatha] Hanaysha told CNN…

CNN points out that an Israeli army spokesperson Ran Kochav described the journalists as “armed with cameras” later that day.

The CNN investigation reviewed a 16-minute video shot by Salim Awad, a 27-year-old Jenin camp resident.

His video captures the moment that shots were fired at the four journalists — Abu Akleh, Hanaysha, another Palestinian journalist, Mujahid al-Saadi, and Al Jazeera producer Ali al-Samoudi, who was injured in the gunfire — as they walked toward the Israeli vehicles. In the footage, Abu Akleh can be seen turning away from the barrage. The footage shows a direct line of sight towards the Israeli convoy.

Awad witnessed the attack.

“We saw around four or five military vehicles on that street with rifles sticking out of them and one of them shot Shireen. We were standing right there, we saw it. When we tried to approach her, they shot at us. I tried to cross the street to help, but I couldn’t,” Awad said.

Another witness reinforced this account:

Jamal Huwail, a professor at the Arab American University in Jenin, who helped drag Abu Akleh’s lifeless body from the road, said he believed the shots were coming from one of the Israeli vehicles, which he described as a “new model which had an opening for snipers,” because of the elevation and direction of the bullets.

“They were shooting directly at the journalists,” Huwail said.

The investigation analyzed videos and photos of the scene with the help of two military experts, to conclude that the shot that hit Abu Akleh was fired by a sniper aiming at a target in a manner that points to Israeli soldiers positioned about 600 feet away.


“The number of strike marks on the tree where Shireen was standing proves this wasn’t a random shot, she was targeted,” [Chris] Cobb-Smith [a weapons expert and British army veteran] told CNN, adding that, in sharp contrast, the majority of gunfire from Palestinians captured on camera that day were “random sprays.”…

At 200 meters, Cobb-Smith said that there was “no chance” that random firing would result in three or four shots hitting in such a tight configuration. “From the strike marks on the tree, it appears that the shots, one of which hit Shireen, came from down the street from the direction of the IDF troops.”

PHOTO OF 3 GROUPED GUNSHOTS ON TREE BESIDE SHIREEN ABU AKLEH SUPPORT THE IDEA THAT SHE WAS TARGETED AND NOT THE VICTIM OF A BURST OF GUNFIRE. FROM THE CNN INVESTIGATION, MAY 24, 2022.

A second expert consulted by CNN was Robert Maher, professor of electrical and computer engineering at Montana State University, who specializes in forensic audio analysis. Maher analyzed the intervals between the sounds of bullets leaving the barrel and the subsequent muzzle explosions recorded on video to assess the distance of the shooter from the camera.

“That would correspond to a distance of something between 177 and 197 meters,” or 580 and 646 feet, he said in an email to CNN, which corresponds almost exactly with the Israeli sniper’s position.

The best thing about the CNN report is that it shows that international media are not going to forget about Shireen Abu Akleh’s killing. We can only hope that more media and free speech organizations become advocates for Abu Akleh in death, as governments try to push the case aside.

Shireen Abu Akleh in her own words

In addition to being a courageous journalist, Shireen Abu Akleh also wrote in-depth articles reflecting on the role of the media in the struggle for Palestinian human rights.

BY MUHAMMAD ALI KHALIDI MAY 23, 2022 
(FILE) A PHOTO TAKEN ON OCTOBER 15, 2018. AL JAZEERA JOURNALIST SHIREEN ABU AKLEH TAKES A PHOTO DURING THE COVERAGE OF THE CLOSURE OF LUBBAN AL-SHARQIYA SCHOOL SOUTH OF NABLUS CITY, IN THE WEST BANK. (PHOTO: WAJED NOBANI/APA IMAGES)


As is now widely known, Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was killed on May 11, 2022, while covering an Israeli military raid on a refugee camp in the occupied Palestinian territories for Al Jazeera. Her TV channel has accused Israel of “assassinating her in cold blood,” and her funeral included thousands of marchers in Jerusalem.

To add injury to injustice, her pallbearers and mourners were attacked by baton-wielding Israeli soldiers, who tried to prevent marchers from waving Palestinian flags.

After initially vigorously denying that she was shot by an Israeli sniper, Israel first said it would investigate the crime, then callously refused to do so. Abu Akleh was the latest victim of the longest military occupation in the contemporary world, and one of an estimated 50 Palestinian journalists killed since 2000, six of them in the past two years, according to the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate.

What is not so well known is that, in addition to being a courageous journalist of great integrity, Abu Akleh also wrote in-depth articles reflecting on the role of the media in the struggle for Palestinian human rights. Tragically, she wrote about a number of issues that are directly relevant to her assassination by the Israeli occupation forces.

An article written in 2016 for the Arabic-language journal of the Institute for Palestine Studies, discussed media coverage of the Palestinian “Popular Rebellion” (al-Habbah al-Sha’biyyah) of late 2015 and early 2016, which was ignited by Israeli raids on the al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem.

The article reflects broadly on the complexities of reporting under military occupation. In it, Abu Akleh describes the readiness of the Israeli military to use lethal force against unarmed civilians, she discusses Israeli attacks on the news media, and she analyzes Israeli attempts to deny culpability for crimes committed against Palestinians.

She also comments on the fact that Palestinians killed by the Israeli military are often portrayed as heroes and role models by local Palestinian media, whether or not they want to be seen as such.

In one passage, Abu Akleh observed, with tragic prescience, on the ease with which Israeli soldiers killed unarmed civilians during the “Popular Rebellion” of 2015-2016:

In the most recent rebellion, the media was at least able to undermine the Israeli narrative – if not refute it entirely – when it came to the killing of many young men and women, notably in cases where there were no Israeli casualties. It became clear during the recent rebellion that Israeli soldiers would not hesitate to pull the trigger on Palestinians on the barest suspicion of their intention to carry out an operation.

She also commented on the media’s success in challenging the official Israeli explanation in some civilian deaths, on grounds of self-defense:

The media also succeeded in raising questions about Israel’s killing of suspects, many of whom were minors, when there was no need to do so. Images clearly showed numerous instances in which Palestinians were executed even though they posed no threat to soldiers’ lives.

She was sharply critical of Israeli attacks on Palestinian media outlets that covered violent assaults on civilians and documented the brutality of the Israeli occupation:

It’s not surprising that Israel regards the media as an agitator against the occupation and takes extreme measures against the news media, such as shutting down three radio stations in Hebron and confiscating all their equipment… Dozens of journalists have been injured by Israel with live ammunition and rubber-coated bullets in the course of their reporting. And at least 19 have been arrested in the most recent assault…

Meanwhile, Abu Akleh was attuned to the alienation of Palestinian youth from their political leadership and tried to convey their sense of political impotence:

It’s hard to discuss the recent rebellion without at least mentioning the role of the political leadership and the Palestinian political factions. Or maybe it would be more accurate to say: without mentioning their absence. After years of political impasse and the ongoing division between the two parts of the nation [the West Bank and Gaza Strip], and in light of the inability of the political factions to effect any change on the political scene, a general sense of alienation has arisen between the younger generation and the political leadership.


She also wrote somewhat critically on the Palestinian media’s commemoration of all victims of the Israeli occupation as martyrs and heroes, whether they like it or not:

The local news media generally propagate the image of the martyr as a role model and hero. The families of martyrs are often enlisted to glorify martyrdom, irrespective of their actual feelings. On October 27, 2015, I was covering the funeral of Iyad Jaradat, who was killed in the town of Sa’ir northeast of Hebron, when he was shot with a bullet to the head during confrontations with the Israeli occupation forces. Approaching his mother before the arrival of the body, I wondered what I could possibly ask her. As soon as I asked permission to interview her, relatives who were standing beside her began repeating the stock phrases used in the aftermath of martyrdom. “Tell them that he died for the sake of al-Aqsa mosque, the nation, Palestine, and Jerusalem.” So I asked a different question from the one I had prepared: “Is it any consolation to you that your son died for the sake of al-Aqsa?” She raised a finger to indicate negation and said: “No, nothing can be a consolation.”

That mother’s testimony says it all. Even though Shireen was killed in the line of duty, as she bore witness to the injustice and brutality of military occupation to the world, nothing can be a consolation for her loss.

The entire translated text of the article was published on the Institute of Palestine Studies’ blog, Palestine Square.

Shireen Abu Akleh: Two Assassinations, Four Funerals

The mass outpouring of national unity that followed the martyrdom of Shireen Abu Akleh reflects a historic moment of unified Palestinian struggle and consciousness.
STUDENTS CARRY A MOCK COFFIN AS THEY HOLD A SYMBOLIC FUNERAL FOR SLAIN AL JAZEERA JOURNALIST SHIREEN ABU AKLEH, AT AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY IN MUGHRAQA, CENTRAL GAZA STRIP, ON MAY 16, 2022. (PHOTO: ASHRAF AMRA/APA IMAGES)

Editor’s Note: This article was first published by the Institute for Palestine Studies on May 17, 2022 and has been translated and republished with their permission.


This is not a lament for Shireen, nor is it a political article. It is not a press report, nor is it a study. It is not a tribute or condolence, because Shireen Abu Akleh deserves more than all of these. These are mere observations and impressions of The Assassination of Shireen, of the deep sadness that has stricken people, all people, not only in Palestine, but across the world. These are impressions of “real funerals” rather than metaphorical, of the sanctity of the casket and coffin, of the raised flags, and those that fell to the ground, of the capital and the conflict over the capital, of the tragic departure of a dear friend, an exceptional human at all levels. I do not write this to praise her virtues, everyone has done so already, although she deserves a lot, and a lot from us.
Shireen Abu Akleh renewed Palestine and the values of the Palestinian people

Shireen was insidiously and aggressively assassinated. With her martyrdom, every Palestinian felt that they had lost their own someone dear. Shireen, who had entered every house through al-Jazeera for a quarter of a century of hard, respectful, and professional journalism, is entering houses this time as a member of every Palestinian family, in the east, west, north, and south. Every Palestinian felt personally touched by her martyrdom, and thus felt subjugated and humiliated. Everyone is asking “how could a well-known journalist be killed in the field dressed in such a way that clearly indicates that she is a journalist: a helmet and a vest with the word ‘PRESS’?” This act targets those who tell the truth, the truth about daily killing in Palestine.

The assassination of Shireen, turning her into news, is an Israeli attempt to hide the truth; and to discipline, intimidate, and deter those who seek to show it. However, the reaction to her murder exceeded all expectations, with hundreds of thousands of people taking to the streets to express their anger, not only in solidarity with Shireen’s small family, but because to most of them Shireen is family.

This large and massive participation in the funeral is but an expression of great anger, and the retrieval of the concept of Palestine, that is still under occupation, thus the retrieval of collective values of people under occupation, the most important of which is the collective sense of the need to be rid of this occupation and end it through resistance. With all its political and religious diversity, including diversity imposed by the Israeli occupation (West Bank, Palestinians of lands occupied in 1948, and the Gaza Strip), the Palestinian people expressed unprecedented national and on-the-ground unity. What made this unity special is that it was not emotional or sentimental, but an extension and an accumulation of what happened in May 2021 during attacks on the Gaza Strip and Sheikh Jarrah, an extension of the great solidarity with the prisoners of the Freedom Tunnel last September. These heroic prisoners, whose heroic and courageous actions reverberated around the whole world, are still being punished by the occupation through the murder of their siblings. Now comes the martyrdom of Shireen Abu Akleh, which served to crown, perpetuate, and define this moment of a great unitary struggle, which will inevitably be understood in the future as a moment of continuity with the events of the past year.

Jerusalem the Capital

MOURNERS CARRY SLAIN AL JAZEERA VETERAN JOURNALIST SHIREEN ABU AKLEH DURING HER FUNERAL PROCESSION IN THE OLD CITY OF JERUSALEM ON MAY 13, 2022. (PHOTO: JERIES BSSIER/APA IMAGES)

“Jerusalem is Arab”; this is not just a slogan that the residents of the West Bank shouted near Israeli checkpoints that surround the city, which they are forbidden from entering, these are the cheers of hundreds of thousands who shouted from the walls of the Old City, and in its alleyways. This simply means that the conflict over the city has been resolved by Palestinian and Arab consciousness, by global popular consciousness and, will of course be introduced and reintroduced, in international forums.

As for the nuclear state, with a smart, powerful, and technologically advanced, “most ethical” army, as it claims, it proceeded for six consecutive hours to confiscate Palestinian flags carried by mourners, who not only raised the Palestinian flag, but also removed Israeli flags off their flagpoles at Jaffa Gate, one of the gates of the Old City of Jerusalem. This means that 74 years on, this “strong” state is still not able to control neighborhoods in its capital or in “the capital”, which says a lot.

This “strong” state attempted to limit the number of mourners participating in Shireen’s funeral, and planned to implement this order, demanding that the funeral be limited to religious rites, and that mourners would not raise Palestinian flags, and thus deployed police forces to the vicinity of the (St. Louis) French Hospital to tighten its control over the funeral.

This “strong” state permitted itself to do what no one in history has done, no matter their religion, and assaulted the casket in a very hideous way that will forever be engraved in people’s memories. With this assault, Israel assassinated Shireen Abu Akleh again, but in doing so, it strengthened the resolve of mourners to participate mightily in the funeral, in a manner deserving of a martyr from Palestine, and instilled in the minds of people in the entire world the most heinous picture of this occupation.

ISRAELI SECURITY FORCES ATTACK PALLBEARERS CARRYING THE CASKET OF SHIREEN ABU AKLEH OUT OF THE ST LOUIS FRENCH HOSPITAL IN OCCUPIED EAST JERUSALEM’S SHEIKH JARRAH NEIGHBORHOOD. BEFORE BEING TRANSPORTED TO A CHURCH AND THEN HER RESTING PLACE IN JERUSALEM. (PHOTO: AHMAD GHARABLI/AFP)


The heroes: Protectors of the funeral and coffin


Let’s imagine for a second the brutality with which young Jerusalemites and non-Jerusalemites who carried Shireen’s coffin on their shoulders were beaten. Let’s imagine the thick batons that the (Israeli) police used to beat them. Let’s imagine the poisonous gasses that polluted the air of the funeral, the filthy wastewater that contaminated the area, on a sanitary level, since it was in the vicinity of a hospital, as well as on an ethical level, since it held the body of a martyr.

These heroes received batons, punches, and severe beatings, and yet held on to the coffin, they endured this much blind loathing and held on to the coffin, raised high on their shoulders, as a martyr from Palestine deserves, as Shireen Abu Akleh deserves.
The hero and heroes who saved Shatha Hanaysha and tried to save Shireen at the outskirts of the camp the moment of the crime

It is not only the brutal image of the occupation and its crimes that would remain engraved in our minds, nor just the pictures of the funeral, nor just the pictures of the young men who climbed the walls of the Old City, but the pictures of the heroes who could not care less about their lives, and insisted on reaching the site of Shireen’s martyrdom, with journalist Shatha Hanaysha, whom they saved from a certain death. They managed to take Shireen to a hospital despite the intensity of the murderers’ bullets at the site. These young men, although not fighters, have turned into heroes in everyone’s eyes. Is there an act higher than the sacrifice they have made?

Walid, Guevara, Sandy, Wissam, Najwan, Samir, Elias and injured Ali Samoudi, as well as other al-Jazeera crew members working in Palestine

AL JAZEERA JOURNALIST GUEVARA AL-BUDAIRI BIDS FAREWELL TO AL JAZEERA JOURNALIST SHIREEN ABU AKLEH, WHO WAS KILLED DURING AN ISRAELI RAID, IN THE WEST BANK CITY OF RAMALLAH ON MAY 12, 2022. (PHOTO: WAJED NOBANI/APA IMAGES)

About those heartbroken by the death of a friend, colleague, sister and journalist, about their bravery to continue to report, pictures and news, despite their great loss, and about their heavy tears as they covered the news, and about their coherence in the funeral, during the burial procession, and in funeral homes. It was as if they had agreed to postpone their grief until after they finished their duty of covering (the news) in a way that their colleague Shireen deserved. They continued their coverage for five days, covering not only the funeral route and the ceremony, but also the news of Palestine – specifically, the raids against the Jenin refugee camp on the day of the funeral.
Iman, Manal, Wasim, Carol, Jamal, Michael, Nadia, Nay, Marian, Rita, Malak, Faten, Fouad, Haitham, and other close friends

All of these friends concurred that Shireen had honored them with her friendship, and that their loss was great and very painful; to Shireen they were family, and at the same time Shireen was family to them. The impact of her loss was enormous, a great silence ensued, and their eyes reflected the entire sadness of this tragedy. But the determination of Shireen’s colleagues and friends to take part in her farewell from Jenin to Jerusalem, through all the cities and towns, to commemorate her, and the continued talk of her, gave them the strength to cope with the shock of her departure.
Her brother Antoine, his wife Lisa, son Nasri and daughters Lena and Larrain

Antoine, the brother who received the news of his sister Shireen’s injury, and then her martyrdom, via breaking news thousands of miles away from Palestine, for him to begin the risky return journey from Somalia, where he works with the United Nations, which was under complete closure due to general elections, he had to travel most of the distance to the airport on foot and reached it without a ticket or any preparation to travel in the times of Covid-19 and its procedures. On board, he saw everything happening in Palestine, he saw the Israeli police storming his home in Beit Hanina, he had to experience a thousand thoughts all while also experiencing this overwhelming sadness.

Shireen conjured Palestine up with her death, and this may be a consolation for her small family and for all of us.

An only brother loses his only sister, his two daughters and son lost their only aunt, they were deprived of an aunt; Antoine’s wife, Lisa, lost her sister-in-law, her friend and her sister. What brutality is this?

What consoles Antoine, Lisa and their children is that Shireen regained the Arabism of Jerusalem, she united Palestinians, restored the spirit of international solidarity with Palestine, and redirected the compass to its rightful place. Shireen conjured Palestine up with her death, and this may be a consolation for her small family and for all of us.
Finally, the murderer’s narrative

Shireen’s greatest passion was to expose the crimes of the Israeli occupation in Palestine, and through her work as a journalist, she exposed murders, confiscations, Judaization, repression, and racial discrimination. She was always face-to-face with the Zionist narrative, exposing its lies and claims. I do not want to go into the mazes of the investigation, nor the identity of who is behind the murderer, or the justifications they gave to media, let alone their ghastly confusion, their attempt to confuse the world’s public opinion in turn, the ensuing obfuscation, and so on.

There is a known murderer with a name and a commander, the commander has a higher commander, and the higher commander reports to a political official, all of whom decided on the 11th of May, 2022 to continue to shed Palestinian blood. Those behind the crime are the occupation authorities who sent their special forces to practice what they do best: killing Palestinians wherever they are, regardless of profession. Over time, the occupation has killed journalists, lawyers, doctors, children, young men, and women, without being prevented by any taboos. I repeat that there is a known murderer, and when the occupation ceases to carry out daily killings in villages, cities and refugee camps in Palestine, it will lose its raison d’ĂŞtre.

The departure of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh entails a lot of work that the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian and international human rights institutions have to do to expose the practices of this occupation. The forces of political and civil society have a lot of burdens to bear in order to maintain the momentum of solidarity that the departure of martyr Abu Akleh has left, an unprecedented international solidarity that must be preserved, observed, developed, and supported.

Translated by Nina AbuFarha

Khaled Farraj
Khaled Farraj is the Director General of the Institute for Palestine Studies.

Wednesday, May 11, 2022

REST IN POWER
Al Jazeera's Shireen Abu Akleh: pioneering Palestinian reporter


Palestinians hold posters displaying veteran Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, in the West Bank city of Hebron 
(AFP/HAZEM BADER)

Wed, May 11, 2022, AFP

Shireen Abu Akleh, who was killed Wednesday while covering clashes in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was among Arab media's most prominent figures and widely hailed for her bravery and professionalism.

In the hours after her death, young Palestinians described Abu Akleh, 51, as an inspiration, especially to women, many of whom were motivated to pursue journalism because of her.

"She never tired," Al Jazeera senior international correspondent Hoda Abdel-Hamid told AFP by phone from Ukraine. "She was always there whenever anything happened... She wanted to be there, to tell the story, constantly," she added.

In an interview shortly before her death, Abu Akleh, who was also a US citizen, described herself as a "product of Jerusalem," with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict shaping much of her life.

She was born in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem to a Palestinian Christian family. Her mother was born in west Jerusalem, before the creation of Israel in 1948, and her father was from Bethlehem, in the occupied West Bank.

She graduated from university the year the Oslo peace accords were signed and then joined the nascent Voice of Palestine radio, before switching to Al Jazeera in 1997, where she went on to become an iconic personality in Arab media.

In a sign of her importance to Palestinian audiences, flowers were placed on the side of the road by West Bank residents as the vehicle carrying her body moved towards Nablus, where an autopsy was scheduled before her burial in Jerusalem.


This handout picture obtained from a former colleague of Shireen Abu Akleh shows her reporting for the Doha-based news channel Al Jazeera from Jerusalem on July 22, 2017 
(AFP/-)

- Breaking gender roles -

Journalist Muhammad Daraghmeh, a close friend who teaches at Birzeit University in the West Bank, said Abu Akleh was "one of the strongest journalists in the Arab world".

Her prominence grew through her coverage of the second Palestinian intifada, or uprising, from 2000 to 2005.

Senior Al Jazeera journalist Dima Khatib tweeted that Abu Akleh was "one of the first Arab women war correspondents in the late 1990s when the traditional role of women was to present from the television studio".

"Shireen was a pioneer in a generation that broke stereotypical gender roles in TV journalism."

Al Jazeera, the Palestinian Authority and witnesses said she was shot by Israeli forces while covering an Israeli army raid in Jenin.

Israel's Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said it was "likely" that she was killed by indiscriminate gunfire from Palestinian militants.

Abdel-Hamid said: "We need investigation and accountability, not just investigations that lead nowhere."


People mourn Al Jazeera journalist killed during Israel West Bank raid 
(AFP/Jaafar ASHTIYEH)

In a recent interview, Abu Akleh said she was often afraid while reporting but made sure to avoid unnecessary risk.

"I don't throw myself at death," she told an outlet in the West Bank city of Nablus. "I search for a safe place to stand and how to protect my crew before worrying about the footage."

Last year, Abu Akleh wrote in the publication This Week in Palestine that Jenin, the place where she died, was not just "one ephemeral story in my career or even in my personal life".

"It is the city that can raise my morale and help me fly. It embodies the Palestinian spirit that sometimes trembles and falls but, beyond all expectations, rises to pursue its flights and dreams."

bur-yz/bs/fz/dv

Al Jazeera reporter killed: 'Independent investigation' is necessary, says Reporters Without Borders
Veteran Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American who was among the network's most prominent figures, was shot dead Wednesday as she covered an Israeli army raid in the occupied West Bank. Pauline Ades-Mevel, Reporters Without Borders's spokeperson, says that an "independent investigation is necessary to avoid impunity".

Al Jazeera pays tearful tribute to journalist killed in Israeli raid

Shireen Abu Akleh, 51, was shot dead as she covered an Israeli raid on Jenin refugee camp in the occupied West Bank - -

by Tim Witcher

May 11, 2022 — Doha (AFP)

Al Jazeera's newsdesk told Shireen Abu Akleh they would keep a spot for her "at the top of the hour" after she said in an email she was going to cover an Israeli operation in the Palestinian town of Jenin.

"But she never turned up," said Mohamed Moawad, the Arabic channel's head of output, fighting back tears as he told of the final contacts with the veteran journalist on a typically risky mission.

"The last communication was 20 minutes before this heinous crime happened," Moawad told AFP shortly after staff held their own broadcast tribute to the 51-year-old.

"She sent an email that said 'Hi, there is an Israeli intervention in Jenin and I am heading there now. I am almost there. I will send you details'."

Instead of her live report from the raid, Al Jazeera staff were shaken to see social media images indicating she had been shot.

Moawad said another journalist soon sent a message informing them she had died three kilometres (nearly two miles) from the edge of Jenin in the West Bank.


She had been with four other journalists, all wearing blue press vests and helmets, according to the Al Jazeera chief.

The Qatari state-owned channel said Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American, had been killed "in cold blood" and demanded Israeli forces be held accountable.

Israel said it was investigating the death but denied Abu Akleh had been deliberately hit. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said it was "likely" Palestinian gunfire had hit her.

- 'Extremely brave' -


"We consider this something intentional because the bullet hit exactly the area below her ear where there is no cover," said Moawad, who added that "reckless" comments had been made in Israel about the killing.

Al Jazeera journalists shed tears during the minute when its broadcasts were silenced as a tribute to the journalist who joined the channel shortly after it opened in 1996.

Many who had worked with Abu Akleh embraced in the newsroom, clutching portraits of the journalist and sheets stating "Journalism is not a crime", as images showing the latest violence in the Palestinian territories flashed up on their work screens.

Abu Akleh -- the second journalist hired by Al Jazeera in the Palestinian territories -- became the 12th journalist from the channel to be killed on duty since it started broadcasting.


"She was everywhere where there was a story. She has been everywhere to give voice to the voiceless," said Moawad.

"There are so many videos showing Shireen getting attacked by Israeli forces, getting attacked by bullets and other stuff."

Abu Akleh had never complained about her own safety though, he added.

"She was always there covering the story without any kind of fear. We never assigned Shireen to do a story, she was just there. She showed up."

Hoda Abdel-Hamid, a senior correspondent at Al Jazeera, said Abu Akleh was "extremely brave".

"But she was also a very experienced journalist, she was not one to take stupid risks for the hell of it," she told AFP from her mission in Ukraine.

"I am pretty sure that today she was in a safe place, in a place that was for journalists and she was clearly marked.

"She wouldn't be jumping in the crossfire just for the hell of it. She wouldn't do that."


Shireen Abu Aqla: Palestinians’ 'voice and face' to the Arab world

By KHALED ABU TOAMEH - 
© (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)
The Jerusalem Post

For many Palestinians, Shireen Abu Aqla, the veteran Al-Jazeera reporter who was killed during an IDF operation in Jenin on Wednesday morning, was more than a journalist.

For the past two decades, Abu Aqla, a resident of east Jerusalem, became known as one of the main voices and faces of the Palestinians in the popular Qatari-owned TV network.

She was one of the few Palestinian female journalists who reported from the field, especially in Jerusalem and the West Bank. Some of her colleagues described her as the “Palestinian war correspondent.”

“She was a fearless reporter,” said one of her colleagues. “She never hesitated to go to places where clashes were taking place. She loved her work.”

Many of her colleagues appreciated her courage for reporting from the scenes of clashes between Israeli policemen and soldiers. They also described her as one of the most professional female journalists.


© Provided by The Jerusalem Post
Joint LIst MKs Ayman Odeh, Aida Touma-Sliman and Ofer Cassif visit the family of killed journalist Shireen Abu Akleh on May 11, 2022.
 (credit: JOINT LIST SPOKESPERSON'S OFFICE)

Abu Aqla, 51, reported extensively on the situation in the city, including the violence that erupted at the Aqsa Mosque compound, the Old City’s Damascus Gate and the neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah.

She also reported on the situation in the West Bank with a focus on clashes between IDF soldiers and Palestinians. She often appeared on Al-Jazeera wearing a helmet and a vest with a “press” sign.

When she was once asked about the dangers she faces while covering the violence, Abu Aqla replied: “Death was always a short distance away. During the difficult moments, I overcame the fear. I chose journalism to be close to the human being. It’s probably not easy for me to change the reality, but at least I was able to communicate that voice to the world.”

Abu Aqla rose to stardom during the Second Intifada, which erupted in 2000. Her reporting on the daily violence turned her into one of the most popular reporters in the eyes of Al-Jazeera’s millions of viewers in the Arab world.

She was also known for her criticism of Israel. In one of her recent tweets, she wrote: “No Arab will be able to ignore the Palestinian issue, no matter how much Israel tries to marginalize this issue.”

Abu Aqla, whose family is originally from Bethlehem, was raised in east Jerusalem, where she went to the Rosary Sisters’ School.

After completing her studies in journalism in Jordan, she returned to the city, where she initially worked for the United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). She was later hired by the PA’s Voice of Palestine radio station and Monte Carlo radio’s Arab news department. In 1997, she began working for Al-Jazeera’s newly established bureau in Jerusalem.



SEE


Saturday, May 28, 2022

Al Jazeera says it will go to ICC over killing of Palestinian journalist


By Associated Press
 May 29, 2022

The Al Jazeera news network says it will submit a case file to the International Criminal Court on the killing of reporter Shireen Abu Akleh, who was shot dead earlier this month during an Israeli raid in the occupied West Bank.

The Qatar-based network and the Palestinian Authority have accused Israeli soldiers of deliberately killing her.

Israel rejects those allegations as a “blatant lie." It says she was shot during a firefight between soldiers and Palestinian militants, and that only ballistic analysis of the bullet - which is held by the PA - can determine who fired the fatal shot.


An AP reconstruction lent support to witnesses who say the veteran Palestinian-American correspondent was killed by Israeli fire, but any final conclusion may depend on evidence that has not yet been released.

Palestinians visit the site where veteran Palestinian-American reporter Shireen Abu Akleh was shot and killed, in the West Bank city of Jenin, May 18, 2022. The Al Jazeera news network says it will submit a case file to the International Criminal Court on the killing of reporter Shireen Abu Akleh, who was shot dead earlier this month during an Israeli raid in the occupied West Bank. (AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed, File) (AP)

Al Jazeera said late Thursday it has formed an international legal team to prepare a case dossier to be submitted to the ICC. The court launched an investigation into possible Israeli war crimes last year. Israel is not a member of the ICC and has rejected the probe as being biased against it.

Al Jazeera said the case file would also include the Israeli bombing of the building housing its offices in Gaza City during last year's war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, “as well as the continuous incitements and attacks on its journalists operating in the occupied Palestinian territories.”

Israel said the building - which also housed the Gaza office of The Associated Press - contained Hamas military infrastructure, but has not provided any evidence. The AP was not aware of any purported Hamas presence in the building and condemned the strike as “shocking and horrifying.” No one was hurt in the strike, which came after an Israeli warning to evacuate.

“The Network vows to follow every path to achieve justice for Shireen, and ensure those responsible for her killing are brought to justice and held accountable in all international justice and legal platforms and courts,” Al Jazeera said.

Al-Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was shot and killed while covering an Israeli raid in the occupied West Bank town of Jenin early Wednesday. (Twitter)

Israel says it cannot determine whether Palestinian militants or its own soldiers fired the fatal shot unless the PA hands over the bullet that killed Abu Akleh for ballistic analysis. The PA has refused to cooperate with Israel in any way, saying it doesn't trust Israel to investigate itself.

The PA announced the results of its own probe on Thursday, saying Abu Akleh was deliberately killed by Israeli forces and that there were no militants in the area. Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz rejected the findings, saying “any claim that the IDF intentionally harms journalists or uninvolved civilians is a blatant lie,” referring to the Israeli military.

Palestinian Attorney General Akram Al Khateeb, in announcing the results of the probe, said the bullet that killed her was an armor-piercing 5.56 mm NATO round and that it appeared to have been fired by a Ruger Mini-14 semiautomatic rifle.

The Israeli military declined to comment on whether the gun described by the Palestinians matches one the military has previously identified as having possibly fired the fatal shot. It also declined to say whether the army uses the Ruger Mini-14 or whether any were in use during the May 11 raid in which Abu Akleh was killed, in the West Bank town of Jenin.

Israel has publicly called for a joint investigation with the PA, with the participation of the US The State Department said this week that neither Israel nor the PA have formally requested its assistance. Each side is in sole possession of potentially crucial evidence, and neither is likely to accept any conclusions reached by the other.


Israel claims no Israeli soldier 'deliberately' shot at Shireen Abu Akleh after internal investigation


The New Arab Staff
28 May, 2022

Israel's military and leaders initially said it was 'likely' that Shireen Abu Akleh, a veteran reporter for Al Jazeera, was killed by Palestinian gunmen.


Israeli military chief Aviv Kochavi on Friday shared results of an internal investigation into Shireen Abu Akleh's killing 
[AFP via Getty]

Israel's military has claimed that an internal investigation has found that no Israeli soldier deliberately fired the shot that killed Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh earlier this month.

The claim - which contradicts eyewitness accounts, a probe by the Palestinian Authority, and journalistic investigations - was made in a video statement posted by the Israeli military to Twitter on Friday evening.

"No IDF soldier deliberately fired at a journalist. We investigated this. That is the conclusion, and there is no other," Israeli military chief Aviv Kochavi said in the statement.

Abu Akleh was shot dead on 11 May while reporting on an Israeli military raid on the Jenin refugee camp, in the occupied West Bank.

Israel's military and leaders initially claimed that Abu Akleh, a veteran reporter for Al Jazeera, was killed by Palestinian gunmen. They soon backtracked on that claim, instead saying that they could not conclusively determine whose gunfire killed the veteran US-Palestinian journalist.

RELATED
In-depth
Hugo Goodridge

Shortly after the killing, Israel had asked for the Palestinian Authority to hand over the bullet removed from Abu Akleh's body to conduct a forensic examination.

The PA denied Israel's request for the bullet, saying it did not trust Israel would conduct a fair investigation after it had spread "false narratives" over Abu Akleh's killing.

Israel also offered that Palestinian and US officials could be present during the examination.

However, this week, State Department spokesman Ned Price said he was “not aware of any request for assistance” from either side. And when asked during a press briefing Wednesday — two weeks after Abu Akleh’s death — if the US had been asked to participate or act as an observer, he stood by his previous answer.



Shireen Abu Akleh: Beware of passive mourners

Following the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh, political figures in the US expressed ‘outrage’ and offered their condolences, but this means nothing in the face of their continued support for Israel which includes considerable aid, writes Hebh Jamal


Some US politicians spoke out against the death of Shireen Abu Akleh, but many are critical of their calls for investigations given their continued support for Israel. [GETTY]

“When I arrived in Jenin, I did not expect to relive this overwhelming feeling” Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh wrote last October.

“Jenin is still the same inextinguishable flame that is home to fearless young men who are not intimidated by any potential Israeli invasion” she said. “In Jenin, we met people who have never given up hope; they have not allowed fear to infiltrate their hearts and have not been broken by the Israeli occupation forces.”

Tragically, it was under a similar Israeli invasion in the same occupied Jenin that she spoke about, that Shireen Abu Akleh fell to an Israeli sniper that targeted her and her Al Jazeera colleagues. Abu Akleh was covering an Israeli army raid on the Jenin refugee camp when she was shot in the face by a single bullet, despite wearing a press vest and helmet.

Producer Ali al-Samudi was also shot in the back.

In a statement, Al Jazeera said Abu Akleh was “assassinated in cold blood.”

Shireen’s death sent shockwaves all across the Arab speaking world, specifically amongst Palestinians throughout the diaspora who grew up watching Shireen’s groundbreaking and uncensored coverage of the Israeli occupation.

''Beware of passive mourners who believe there needs to be a rationalisation of Israel’s violence, especially when they vote to provide the means for that violence. An example is an individual like Secretary Antony Blinken, while claiming that he is “troubled” by Israel’s actions, is more than happy to staunchly and unconditionally vote to provide arms and aid to the settler colonial state.''

I was in my father’s house here in New York, with Al Jazeera in the background, as usual, when he stood up in utter shock at the breaking news announcement.

“I can’t believe it,” he said. “They killed a hero.”

Abu Akleh’s death garnered thousands of condolences, even from outspoken pro-Israeli individuals.

Senator Ben Cardin, a senior Democrat and outspoken backer of strong US-Israel ties, said he was “disturbed” by the killing of Abu Akleh.

“Abu Akleh’s death is an attack on a journalist who was wearing her press gear,” he said in a statement. “No journalist should be killed while simply doing their job. I strongly condemn her death and call for an independent and thorough investigation into the incident.”

“The killing of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh is a horrific tragedy,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a staunch supporter of Israel, wrote on Twitter.

“A thorough, objective investigation is needed now. Congress is committed to the defence of press freedoms worldwide and protection of every journalist, particularly those in conflict zones” she said.

Even the US State Department spokesperson, Ned Price, said that he was “heartbroken” over the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh and claimed that they “strongly condemned her killing.”

“We call for an immediate and thorough investigation and full accountability.” Price said. When a journalist questioned whether an Israeli military-led investigation would be considered credible, Price stated that the Israelis “have the wherewithal and the capabilities to conduct a thorough, comprehensive investigation.”

We need to be sceptical of the intentions from what I want to call, passive mourners. Although many of us are mourning the loss of a national icon, we must be alert of both-sides rhetoric that is dominating the narrative surrounding Abu Akleh’s death.

All of a sudden Democratic politicians, liberal organisations, and newspaper editorials are condemning the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh without mentioning exactly who they are condemning, and calling for an investigation that Palestinians can guarantee is far from impartial.

Israel's legal system is a farce. Palestinians under Israeli control in the West Bank are tried in military courts- as opposed to civil courts where their Jewish counterparts are tried in-and the odds of a fair trial are stacked against them. Not only are the trials conducted in Hebrew with little translation usually lasting only 10 minutes, but the rights of defendants are not properly articulated, forcing the great majority to plead guilty and accept plea bargains.

In an Israeli military court, the testimony of a soldier can be enough to send even a minor to prison. Over 99 percent of the trials of Palestinians in Israeli military courts ended in convictions (or 25 acquittals out of 9542). How Israel’s legal system treats occupied Palestinians tells an obvious story that their allegiance is not with the truth.

Let’s also not forget Israel’s immediate reaction to Shireen Abu Akleh’s killing. They were quick to deflect blame by posting a decontextualised video confirming it was indeed Palestinian gunmen in Jenin who shot our beloved journalist, and not Israeli soldiers.

RELATED
Perspectives
Sam Hamad

There was no investigation, no effort to right a wrong, only a last ditch attempt to deflect blame.

Al Jazeera journalists’ eye witness accounts that told the world that it was Israeli soldiers who killed Shireen were enough.

Not believing victims of Israeli violence is not new for Western political pundits. It is instead more appropriate to assign character assassinations in their effort to logically explain Israel’s actions- a colonial state that the West desperately wants to believe is democratic.

On April 5, 2018, the world lost another journalist by Israeli snipers: Yasser Murtaja. Murtaja was covering the second Friday protests during Gaza’s Great March of Return when he was shot in the abdomen, despite him wearing a flak jacket clearly marked with the word ‘press’ on it.

The Jerusalem Post reported on Murtaja’s death with the horrid headline: Journalist or terrorist? Who really was slain Gazan Yaser Murtaja? The article reported on Israel’s security officials that labelled Murtaja as a Hamas operative. While the author concedes that Israel presented no proof to its claims, it ends with the author asking the dishonest question of “who was Yaser Murtaja?”

Palestinians, once again, need to prove their own humanity even after death.

When Israel killed Shireen, then raided her home hours after her death, or even attacked her burial proceeding, Palestinians understood this was the cost of being a voice of Palestinian resistance.

Israel criminalises Palestinian bodies in life and in death, deploying its colonial violence throughout every point of Palestinian life. Israel sees even dead Palestinians as agents of resistance against the occupation.

Beware of passive mourners who believe there needs to be a rationalisation of Israel’s violence, especially when they vote to provide the means for that violence. An example is an individual like Secretary Antony Blinken, while claiming that he is “troubled” by Israel’s actions, is more than happy to staunchly and unconditionally vote to provide arms and aid to the settler colonial state.

Shireen Abu Akleh was murdered because she is Palestinian. Her death signified once again that no one is safe from Israel’s state sponsored violence. It affirmed to the world that for Israel, respecting the slain Palestinian would set a precedent in humanising their existence when alive.

We do not need the condolences of enablers, we need an end of US aid to Israel- for only a free Palestine could have prevented the death of the Palestinian national hero, Shireen Abu Akleh.



Hebh Jamal is a Palestinian American journalist based in Germany.
Follow her on Twitter: @hebh_jamal
Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@alaraby.co.uk
Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The New Arab, its editorial board or staff.