Tuesday, September 21, 2021

 

Gramsci between Marxism and Idealism

Written by Onorato Damen. 

The present volume is the product of Damen’s considerations on Gramsci’s shortcomings as an analytical and practical Marxist which he evidently wrote over a period of years. The structure is loose because he died before he completed it and the draft chapters were only discovered posthumously and eventually published in 1982.


Bordiga Beyond the Myth

Written by Onorato Damen. 

The originality and importance of this volume – in a expanded edition including new documents and editorial notes, from the two previous editions: 1971 and 1977 – mainly lies in the documents that throw permanent light on the distinctive development and perspectives of the “Italian Left” over decades (among the most tragic in modern history) in the history of international communism.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Bordiga Beyond the Myth (2018)2.9 MB

Climate-Production-Capital

Summary

The sixth IPCC report on climate change states that man-made greenhouse gas emissions are the cause of: rising temperatures, melting ice caps, and rising sea levels. The massive increase in emissions of greenhouse gases coincides with the existence of the capitalist mode of production and have intensified with its present structural crisis. Capitalism is the cause of climate change. The scale of recent changes is in many ways unprecedented. Production and consumption of fossil fuels are an integral part of the capitalist production system. A substantial abandonment of fossil fuels thus appears unlikely. The main consequences of climate change are the worsening of living conditions for hundreds of millions of human beings and the intensification of migration. A change of historical significance is required, one that is capable of modifying, or rather, ending the relationship between capitalist production and the environment. Only an internationalist proletarian revolution can constructively bring about a new relationship between humanity, production and the environment, by following the evidence that science gives us – something that cannot happen today because it clashes with the pursuit of profit. This is the perspective the internationalists are fighting for within the world working class.

The Report

To crown a summer of record temperatures, the first part of the IPCC's sixth climate report arrived on 7 August. In it, scientists from the inter-governmental body which monitors climate change describe the changes taking place. In 2022, two more reports will follow. The first will be on the impact, changes and vulnerabilities brought about by climate change, the second on possible methods to mitigate climate change. The report’s conclusions represent the more or less unanimous view of world climatologists on the subject. Among climatologists, deniers of human-made climate change make up less than 0.01% (Powell, 2019).

Here, we will follow the results of the Summary for Policymakers (IPCC, 2021) indicating in brackets the chapter to which we refer and interspersing the reading of the report with our own comments.

The Current State of the Climate

The Report:

It is undeniable that human activity is the cause of the current warming of the atmosphere, oceans and land. This warming is the cause of widespread and rapid changes in the atmosphere, oceans, cryosphere and biosphere.

p.5

Increases in the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (in particular CO2, CH4 and N2O) are detectable from 1750 and are undeniably due to human activity. Starting in the mid-1970s, the situation then began to deteriorate:

each of the last four decades has been hotter than the previous ones.

ibid.

Another source describes the same data even better: there has been an increase of 1.1°C since the end of the 19th century but:

two-thirds of this increase ha occurred since 1975, when the rate of increase began to grow by 0.15-0.20°C every decade.

Tozzi, 2020, p.54

This human activity has been the main vector of the global retreat of glaciers since the 1990s; the decrease in Arctic ice recorded since 1979; the reduction of spring snows in the northern hemisphere; the melting of the Greenland icecap(1) and the ongoing shift of climatic belts towards the poles of both hemispheres. The same human activity has caused: a reduction of oxygen in the oceans since the 1950s, the rise in their temperature since the 1970s and their current acidification.

Since 1900 the sea level has risen by 20 centimetres. With the following historical trend:

  • (1901-1971) + 1.3mm / year;
  • (1971-2006) + 1.9mm / year;
  • (2006-2018) + 3.7mm / year.

Until the 1970s the planet was successful in absorbing a good part of the greenhouse gases produced by human activity but after that the “equilibrium” was broken.

<br/> Graph 1: Impact of human activity on climate change (ICPP, 2021). On the right we see the difference between simulation of the natural course and human influence.

Graph 1: Impact of human activity on climate change (ICPP, 2021). On the right we see the difference between simulation of the natural course and human influence.

Reflection 1: The report speaks of generic influence or "human" activity, but we believe it makes sense to reflect on the fact that humans, homo sapiens, have been on planet Earth for almost 300 thousand years, while the phenomena described concern only the last 250 years, with an increasing peak in the last 50 (see Graph 1). Evidence shows that it is not generic "human activity" that causes current climate change, but the specific form that this activity has taken in the last quarter of a millennium: i.e. the capitalist mode of production. The massive emissions of greenhouse gases that affect climate change coincide with the spread of capitalist industrial society, starting from the mid-eighteenth century, and have intensified as capitalism has become the undisputed mode of production on the entire planet.

Reflection 2: The situation of global warming has got progressively worse since the 1970s. This coincides with the opening of the structural crisis of the third cycle of capitalist accumulation, in which we still live today (Damen, 2020). There is plenty of data to show how the counter-trends that capital has put in place to postpone and limit the effects of its economic crisis have had a devastating impact on the climate and environment, leading to a massive increase in greenhouse gas emissions. (Graph 3). We recall, among the main counter-trends, the following: the microprocessor revolution, the shift of production to the countries of the capitalist periphery, the birth of new commodity sectors, the increase in the mass of goods produced together with the increase in their speed of circulation and the reduction of production costs, starting with wages.

The Report: (A.2) The scale of recent changes in the climate system is, in many respects, unprecedented and unknown to mankind: CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, and the acidity levels of the current oceans are unprecedented in the last 2 million years; to find today's concentrations of CH4 and N2O, it is necessary to go back at least 800,000 years; to find such a sudden rise in atmospheric temperatures 125,000 years; and for sea temperatures we have to go back 11,000 years, to the end of the last ice age.

Reflection 3: In the face of such data, A. Guterres, UN Secretary General judged that:

This report must sound the death knell for coal and fossil fuels before they destroy the planet.

And here is the point. The entire third cycle of capital accumulation (1945- ...) was based on these fuels as the main energy source. In line with historical materialism, a structural revolution of the primary energy sources used by the system is highly unlikely without the planet going through a radical social, economic and political change in terms of the organisation of production. A structural change of this magnitude could only occur as a result of an event of historical significance such as: a generalised war, the global collapse of capitalist civilisation or an international revolution.

The current global capitalist order has literally built and defined itself, in its present form, around fossil fuels. Let's take some examples. The top 10 oil and gas companies (most of them public) produce 22% of greenhouse gases alone (Fontana, 2019), the 100 global companies that deal with fossil fuel are responsible for over 70% of emissions (Griffin, 2017). The oil industries are economically among the most important on the planet, 6 of them are among the 11 companies with the highest profits ever, and in the last decade global oil consumption has continued to grow steadily (Sonnichsen, 2021); fossil fuels are involved in the production of the vast quantity of goods traded worldwide; oil companies still continue to invest huge amounts of new capital in their extraction, refining and distribution activities, and the consumption of fossil fuels has continued its unstoppable progress since the beginning of the industrial era (Graph 2 shows the trend of this consumption in the last 50 years).

<br/> Graph 2: the trend in world energy consumption (Climatizzati, 2019).

Graph 2: the trend in world energy consumption (Climatizzati, 2019).

The Report: (A.3) Climate change activates three types of extreme climatic and meteorological events in different areas of the planet:

  1. extreme heat and heat waves;
  2. massive rainfall and increasingly powerful tropical cyclones;
  3. drought.

And in addition there are the effects of rising sea levels: the melting rate of the ice sheets alone increased fourfold between the 1990s and the 2010s (A.4). The consequences of these events tend to be more and more frequent and intense: floods, famines, fires and desertification.

Reflection 4: Desertification is advancing unstoppably in sub-Saharan Africa, in southern Australia, increasingly affecting the countries of North Africa; rising seas flood the densely populated plains of areas such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, eve threatening new islands and territories; tropical cyclones of ever greater size and power are bringing entire populations to their knees; persistent drought afflicts entire states of central Africa producing deadly famines: mass migrations are one of the most visible direct consequences of such climate change (Tozzi, 2020). Due to prolonged drought, Lake Urmia in Iran, once the largest in the Middle East, has halved since the 1990s and today is in danger of disappearing, leaving an expanse of salt. Water supply is becoming an increasingly serious problem across the Middle East, with extreme peaks in Jordan (Pleingen et al, 2021) where the drying up of the Jordan River is also contributing to the disappearance of the Dead Sea, just as it once did to the Aral Sea and Lake Chad. The first water riots are taking place in Iran (ICT, 2021). On Saturday 14 August 2021, for the first time since the surveys began in the 1950s, precipitation on the peaks of Greenland was rain instead of snow (Ramirez, 2021). Massive fires, the offspring of drought, follow one another in the Amazon, Angola, Australia, Congo, Siberia, the USA ...

2021-08-23-icpp3.png

Capitalism is based on the intensive and extensive exploitation of human beings(2) as planetary resources. The climate emergency, with its consequences for the population of the planet, adds to the suffering already inflicted on the world population by imperialist wars and economic crises. All three of these factors, which characterise our era and influence and feed each other, are determined by the same common denominator: the capitalist mode of production and its structural crisis that began in the early 1970s.

Possible Climatic Futures

The Report: (B.1) The identifiable causes of climate change are essentially three: greenhouse gases, land use and air pollution. The IPCC offers some possible future scenarios depending on how these three variables could be reduced, kept stable or increase their impact on the atmosphere in the short (2021-2040), medium (2041-2060) and long (2081-2100) term.

In the presence of an immediate and drastic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, with a "zero emissions" target by 2050, the temperature (currently at +1.1°C) would rise to +1.5°C in the short term, to + 1.6°C in the medium, to begin to drop to +1.4°C in the long term, but we would have to change the mode of production now.

In the intermediate scenario of a progressive reduction in the increase of emissions, to reach "zero emissions" by 2070, there would be an increase to +1.5°C in the short term, to +2°C in the medium, to +2.7°C in the long term, the effects on humanity would be very severe and will be described in the next report. In the intermediate scenario of a more or less constant rate of emissions to about 2060 and thereafter a reduction to about a quarter of the present level by 2100, there would be an increase to +1.5°C in the short term, to +2°C in the medium, to +2.7°C in the long term, the effects on humanity would be very severe and will also be described in the next report.

In the scenario of a predictable – in our opinion – maintenance of the current greenhouse gas emission trend (scenario 4 out of 5 among those foreseen by the IPCC), it would reach +1.5°C in the short term, +2.1°C in the short term. medium and +3.6°C in the long term. By comparison, the last time the global temperature reached or exceeded +2.5°C was 3 million years ago. However, emissions could even increase and/or the climate could react unexpectedly, and this could lead to even worse scenarios.

In prospect, all the extreme climatic events described above will intensify as a function of the increase in temperatures, while the CO2 absorption capacity of oceans and lands will become proportionately less and less efficient in slowing the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere. Many changes triggered by past and present greenhouse gas emissions are already irreversible today for a period ranging from hundreds to thousands of years. The sea level – compared to 2014 – will rise by 2100 by a variable measure between +28cm and +101cm depending on the scenario, to reach a value that can fluctuate between + 37cm and + 2m or more by 2150. It all depends on how quickly greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced and on the possible unpredictable effects of an intensification of the melting of glaciers.

Reflection 5: The question is: how will it be possible to achieve the desired and necessary reduction of greenhouse gases? Based on the data currently available to us, their drastic and immediate reduction appears at least unlikely at the moment. In old capitalist countries, such as Europe and to a lesser extent the USA, a certain reduction is underway, together with a timid increase in CDR (Carbon Dioxide Removal) technologies, including the planting of new trees – it is estimated that at least 1,200 billion should be planted (Tozzi, 2020). Reformism – new and old – affirms that it is time for states, if not the central banks, to finance ecologically compatible production in favour of the so-called green transition (Roberts, 2021). Is the system as a whole therefore acknowledging the need to reduce greenhouse gases? Reality speaks otherwise. Jay Powell, governor general of the US Federal Reserve, stated on June 4, 2021 that:

Today, climate change is not something we consider directly in the definition of monetary policy.

And in fact, observing Graph 3 we see how in the productive heart of contemporary capitalism – Asia, and in particular the emerging imperialist powers, China and India, where the production of goods has been transferred to most since the early 1970s – the levels of CO2 production have increased dramatically, abundantly offsetting the timid reductions found in areas of “old” capitalism, such as Europe, which today tends to be devoted to assembly and high-tech production, and the USA, the leading global imperialist power, but today in apparent decline (FD, 2021). Here CO2 emissions remain basically the same.

<br/> Graph 3: Historical graph of total CO2 emissions by region of the planet (Our World in Data, 2019)

Graph 3: Historical graph of total CO2 emissions by region of the planet (Our World in Data, 2019)

From the facts above it emerges that the current framework needs to be profoundly shaken up, and at a structural level, to avoid the worst consequences of the aggravation of climate change described above. It is difficult to predict the real impact of these extreme climatic consequences on the social, health, economic and war levels worldwide and, perhaps, they will themselves cause mass mobilisations capable of triggering future radical change.

We do not believe it plausible that political choices such as those that might be made at the next November Climate Conference in Glasgow – yet another – will represent any more than good intentions that can be ignored.

We repeat: the problem is systemic and structurally intrinsic to capitalism itself, so that only a historical change such as a world war, the general collapse of the system or an international proletarian revolution could lead to profound modification or demolition of the capital-production-environment relationship.

Although a generalised war – or the barbaric collapse of the system – could affect the substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, only a new social organisation, the product of a proletarian and anti-capitalist political revolution, could intervene according to a rational and constructive plan to:

  1. manage the dramatic consequences in human terms dictated by the irreversible climatic upheavals already activated in different latitudes;
  2. launch new production methods that provide for a net reduction in CO2 emissions, full respect for the environment, for the human being, and the application of what the scientific world is telling us. In fact, the search for profit as the prime mover of economic and social development is the main obstacle to achieving a harmonious relationship between human beings and the environment, as even bourgeois science suggests.

From the point of view of those of the working class who grasp this already, it is therefore a question of combining the denunciation of the effects of global warming with the battle against capitalism as a whole. In order to pursue this ambitious project, internationalists undertake to produce and circulate a critique of capitalism on the three levels of the environment, imperialism, and the economy. The climate question, as we have seen, is also a product of the relationship between classes: between a predatory bourgeoisie that strips the planet of all its resources, and a proletariat that must find within itself, starting from its most advanced part, the ability to combine the fight against exploitation, war and climate change and environmental devastation with the strategic elements of a revolutionary project.

Starting from these minimum guidelines, a discourse on climate change in terms of revolutionary change can and must be developed.

Loto

Bibliography:

  • Climatizzati. (2019). Petrolio? Business as usual ... anzi peggio: crescita del 12% entro il 2030. climatizzati.ch
  • Carbon Dioxide Removal. en.wikipedia.org
  • edition.cnn.com
  • Damen, F. (2020). Il capitalismo รจ crisi. Milano: Edizioni Prometeo
  • FD. (2021). 15 August 2021. leftcom.org
  • Fontana, C. (2019). 20 multinazionali del petrolio e gas producono da sole il 30% delle emissioni. 7 January 2019, valori.it
  • Griffin, P. (2017). The Carbon Major Database. CDP report, July 2017
  • ICT. (2021). Iran: On Oil and Troubled Water. leftcom.org
  • IPCC ipcc.ch
  • Pleitgen, F., Otto, C., Dewan, A., Tawfeeq, M. (2021) The Middle East is running out of water, and parts of it are becoming uninhabitable. 22 August 2021. edition.cnn.com
  • Roberts, M. (2021).Climate change: the fault of humanity? thenextrecession.wordpress.com
  • Our world in data. ourworldindata.org
  • Powell, J. L. en.wikipedia.org
  • Ramirez, R., (2021). Rain fell at the normally snowy summit of Greenland for the first time on record. 19 August 2021. edition.cnn.com
  • Sonnichsen, N. (2021). Global Oil Industry, Statistics & facts. statista.com
  • Tozzi, M., Baglioni, L. (2020). Un’ora e mezzo per salvare il mondo. Roma: Rai Libri

Notes

(1) On 1 August 2019, documentary film maker Caspar Haarloev filmed the rivers of melted ice formed on the Greenland polar ice cap. It is estimated that 11 billion tons of ice melted in Greenland alone on 31 July 2019 (Tozzi, 2020).

(2) For human beings, the intensive exploitation of labour power is called relative surplus value, the extensive, absolute surplus value.

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

The War in Afghanistan Is Over, It's Time to Face the Truth

My opinion as the mother of an Army Infantry Officer who served in Kandahar Province during President Obama's surge in Afghanistan.



US Army soldiers in the 1/501st of the 25th Infantry Division shield their eyes from the powerful rotor wash of a Chinook cargo helicopter as they are picked up from a mission October 15, 2009 in Paktika Province, Afghanistan. (Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images)


MARY HLADKY
September 3, 2021

My son, Ryan, was an Army Infantry Officer who served 13 months, at the height of President Obama's Afghanistan surge in Zhari District, Kandahar Province. His men were sent into the heart of the fight, in the place referred to as the Heart of Darkness, the spiritual home of the Taliban.

My son fought and commanded in a war that could never be won, one of hundreds of thousands of Americans who have had their lives forever changed by this pointless and tragic war. As we pan back and view this war as a whole, the reality is far more disturbing than I could have imagined at that time.


We cannot allow the story of this war to be told as anything less than a lesson, a cautionary tale, a devastating loss, and international tragedy that could have been avoided.

The Afghanistan Papers, internal government documents, published by the Washington Post in December 2019, detailed early on that the Afghanistan War was a debacle and could not be won. Yet, our military leaders chose to continue that war for another 16 years. So, briefly summarized below is some of what went so very wrong in Afghanistan.

As the Afghanistan papers reveal, military leadership were more concerned about covering up failures and protecting their jobs than the lives of those on the frontlines. Politicians, on both sides of the aisle, eagerly accepted large campaign donations from military contractors in exchange for their continued support of the war. Major media, heavily influenced by the Pentagon and governmental sources, rarely covered the war. On the rare occasions they did cover the war, they were more likely to cheerlead than to question or investigate. Antiwar voices were not invited to participate on any of the major news programs.

Most tragic has been that nearly everyone in the American public is disengaged from the country's wars. Less than 1% serve in the military. The rest of Americans, the 99%, have been asked to sacrifice nothing. There is no draft and since 9/11 no increased taxes to pay for these wars. So, with no "skin in the game" the vast majority of Americans were incredibly indifferent to what was actually happening to our troops and the Afghan people. The hollow words, "Thank You for Your Service," will never erase or be enough for what has been lost.

Those in power have deeply betrayed our service men and women.

Our troops gave their lives, limbs and emotional well-being for this futile 20-year war. The Afghan people have suffered even more. The U.S., and its allies, have totally destroyed their country. Life in Afghanistan has been, and will be for a long time, a living hell.

One of the ever-changing missions we waged in Afghanistan intended to win over the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. While the words that we spoke may have promised a hopeful cooperative future, our bombs, drones, and night raids drowned out those words. Our commitment to violence buried Afghan hearts and minds beneath paralyzing fear, generational trauma, and the crushing emotions of human pain.

In reality, it is Americans' hearts and minds that need to change. And until we get that—until we reflect upon our mistakes, until we seek to understand and value the humanity of others, until we reassess our foreign policy and choose to solve conflicts through diplomacy and negotiations instead of domination and violence, nothing will change.

Our duty now is to tell the true story of this war. Those in charge must be held accountable. Many powerful documentaries and podcasts exist that tell the story of our soldiers and the people of Afghanistan. Watch them. Share them with others. Follow Afghanistan veterans, Matthew Hoh and Danny Sjursen. Vote and contact your representatives. We cannot allow the story of this war to be told as anything less than a lesson, a cautionary tale, a devastating loss, and international tragedy that could have been avoided.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.



MARY HLADKY is a long-time member of Military Families Speak Out (MFSO) which is a UFPJ member group. She began her work with United for Peace & Justice in 2010 as a member of the Afghanistan Working Group and been a member of the UFPJ Administrative Committee since 2012.
PEANUTS, PEANUTS, GET YER ROASTED PEANUTS
Bill Gates secures $1bn from US firms for climate fight
Cecilia Jamasmie | September 20, 2021 | 

Gates’ Breakthrough Energy’s efforts include investment vehicles, philanthropic programs, policy advocacy, and other initiatives, such as Catalyst. (Image courtesy of World Economic Forum | Photo by Moritz Hager.)

Bill Gates has secured more than $1 billion in corporate funding for Breakthrough Energy Catalyst from seven large US companies to develop some of the world’s most challenging clean-energy projects.


Breakthrough Energy, a non-profit founded by Gates in 2016, said on Monday that the backers — Microsoft, BlackRock, General Motors, American Airlines, Boston Consulting Group, Bank of America and ArcelorMittal — were providing a mix of equity capital and offtakes — purchase agreements tied to the projects.

The Washington-headquartered firm said the funds will be allocated to Breakthrough Energy Catalyst (BEC), a project launched earlier this year that’s aiming to finance, produce, and buy new solutions that will help underpin a zero-carbon economy.

BREAKTHROUGH ENERGY CATALYST WAS LAUNCHED EARLIER THIS YEAR TO FINANCE, PRODUCE, AND BUY THE NEW SOLUTIONS THAT WILL HELP UNDERPIN A ZERO-CARBON ECONOMY

“We’re not doing this to make money,” Larry Fink, chief executive of BlackRock’s CEO, said in a TV interview with Gates. “We’re doing this to seed these ideas, to rapidly accelerate ideas.”

BEC focuses on fast-tracking the commercial viability of four key solutions considered key to the world’s climate crisis: green hydrogen, sustainable aviation fuel, long-duration battery storage and carbon capture from the air.

None of those four technologies are currently cheap enough to spur widespread adoption, Gates said during the interview. “Catalyst is designed to change that and provide an effective way to invest in our clean technology future,” he noted.

BlackRock has pledged $100 million over five years through its charitable foundation, while Microsoft, American Airlines and ArcelorMittal have committed the same amount. The others did not disclose the size of their investments.

Aditya Mittal, CEO of ArcelorMittal, said initiatives like Breakthrough Energy Catalyst are “critical” for the company and the wider steel industry.

“The steel industry knows how to decarbonize – essentially what is missing is the availability of clean energy at competitive prices that provides the foundation for us to really accelerate,” he said.

Metals needed


The world needs aluminum, cobalt, copper, lithium and nickel to propel the switch to a green economy. More than $1 trillion of investment will be required in those key commodities over the next 15 years just to meet the growing demands of decarbonization if global warming is to be kept to less than two degrees by 2050, a recent study by consultancy firm Wood Mackenzie showed.

That conclusion was backed in a highly anticipated report by the UN’s climate panel. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned in August that limiting global warming to close to 1.5 degrees Celsius or even 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels “will be beyond reach” in the next two decades without immediate, rapid and large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

Gates is not the only billionaire involved in pushing green technologies. Tesla CEO Elon Musk vowed to invest $100 million in new carbon capture solutions and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos created last year the $10 billion Bezos Earth Fund, equivalent to about 7% of his net worth, to stop climate change.

Gates Raises $1 Billion as Corporate CEOs Join Race to Scale Clean Tech


Erik Schatzker and Akshat Rathi
Mon., September 20, 2021

LARRY FINK BLACKROCK CEO

(Bloomberg) -- Bill Gates raised more than $1 billion in corporate funding for Breakthrough Energy Catalyst, drawing on BlackRock Inc.’s Larry Fink and Microsoft Corp.’s Satya Nadella to rally support for some of the world’s most demanding clean-energy projects.

BlackRock is making a five-year, $100 million grant from its charitable foundation. Microsoft also is donating $100 million. The other backers -- General Motors Co., Bank of America Corp., American Airlines Group Inc., Boston Consulting Group and ArcelorMittal SA -- are providing a mix of equity capital and so-called offtakes, or purchase agreements tied to the projects.

“We’re not doing this to make money,” Fink, BlackRock’s chief executive officer, said in an interview together with Gates on Bloomberg Television. “We’re doing this to seed these ideas, to rapidly accelerate ideas.”

Gates established Breakthrough Energy Catalyst to accelerate the commercial viability of four key solutions to the climate crisis: green hydrogen, sustainable aviation fuel, long-duration battery storage and carbon capture from the air. In practice, Catalyst will supply the cash needed to get capital-intensive projects off the ground, before debt financing and government funds can be raised to cover the remaining 90% of the cost.

Today, none of those four solutions is cheap enough to spur widespread adoption. For example, jet fuel derived from more-sustainable sources such as industrial waste or alcohol is about five times as expensive as kerosene.

Ideally, the Catalyst projects will, by operating at scale, prove that the underlying technology can be cost-competitive and eliminate the “green premium” over conventional standards.

“The model here is what happened with wind and solar and lithium-ion,” Gates said. “Those products had very high prices compared to conventional techniques, and fortunately Germany and Japan and other buyers funded the scale-up, and now those products fit the normal sort of client-investing metrics.”

The difference now is speed. Governments that signed the Paris Agreement on climate in 2015 are racing to meet a mid-century goal of reaching net zero, which requires not only emissions cuts but also removing carbon dioxide from Earth’s atmosphere.

Nine of the world’s largest economies and many companies, including BlackRock, have pledged to reach that target.

“The pathway for solar and wind, that was a 30-year pathway to make it competitive with hydrocarbons,” Fink said. “We don’t have 30 years. We don’t have 10 years.”

Gates, who has estimated the cost of reaching net-zero emissions at $50 trillion, is hoping his program becomes a model for public-private cooperation to address the threat of climate change.

In August, Catalyst agreed to raise $1.5 billion in return for billions more in support, some of it contingent on legislation, from the U.S. Department of Energy. Separately, Catalyst committed $500 million in June in return for matching funds from the European Commission and European Investment Bank for a similar effort across the Atlantic.

Gates first pitched Nadella and then Fink, who said he in turn had some “very serious conversations” persuading fellow CEOs to back Catalyst. ArcelorMittal is making a $100 million equity investment over five years, and American Airlines also is contributing $100 million. GM, Bank of America and BCG didn’t detail their involvement.

Up-front expense and scalability are two major differences between most tech products and clean-energy solutions. While little to no capital may be required to develop a smartphone app, even a pilot project in carbon capture can cost tens of millions of dollars.

Also, large investors have mostly steered clear of ambitious green undertakings because of uncertain returns. Gates himself has noted publicly that he “lost a lot of money” on battery development.

Fink, who oversees almost $10 trillion in assets at BlackRock, said there’s an “enormous” amount of capital waiting to invest in technology proven to reduce the green premium.

“I’m not frightened about where the money’s coming from,” he said. “I just want to make sure that we have the science and technology and the viability. Once we know that, the capital will be there.”

Coinciding with the infusion of new cash and commitments, Catalyst is inviting would-be projects to fill out a request for information. That’ll be followed by a more precise and technical request for proposal, or RFP, possibly by the end of the year.

Gates, in the interview, laid out a timeline and some parameters:


Catalyst will start funding projects in 2022, probably several in each area.


Funding will cover early-stage costs such as design and add up to “maybe 10%” of the total cost.


The plan is to recruit a total of about 20 companies as anchor partners and increase the pool of private capital to $3 billion.


Green hydrogen and sustainable jet fuel are advanced enough that they could “get to a low price” in three to four years.

“I’d be very disappointed if we don’t see a dramatic reduction in the green premium, even in less than five years,” Gates said. “Because that should let us do two rounds of projects, the first projects and then take the learning from those first two and a half years and do a second round that will bring the costs down even further.”

Catalyst is the latest in a series of initiatives that Gates has founded under the Breakthrough Energy banner. A venture-capital arm, Breathrough Energy Ventures, raised some of its money from billionaires Jeff Bezos and Michael Bloomberg, the founder of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News. Catalyst is run separately and funded independently.

(Adds details on Microsoft’s role in second paragraph.)

 

Hubble takes 31st anniversary image: Two new views showcase the dual nature of the star AG Carinae

Hubble Takes a Closer Look at its 31st Anniversary Image
Credit: ESA/Hubble and NASA, A. Nota, C. Britt

Comparing two images shows puffing dust bubbles and an erupting gas shell—the final acts of a monster star's life.

These new views showcase the dual nature of the star AG Carinae, which was the target of the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope's 31st anniversary image in April 2021. This new perspective is the result of Hubble's observations of the star in 2020 and 2014, along with others captured by the telescope's Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 in 1994.

The first image showcases details of ionized hydrogen and nitrogen emissions from the expanding shell of the nebula (seen here in red). In the second image, the color blue delineates the distribution of dust that shines in reflected star light. Astronomers think powerful stellar winds coming off of the star formed and shaped the dust bubbles and filaments. The nebula is about five light-years wide, similar to the distance from here to the nearest star beyond the Sun, Proxima Centauri.

AG Carinae is formally classified as a luminous blue variable because it is a hot (emitting ), brilliant star that varies in brightness. Such  are quite rare because few are so massive. Luminous blue variable stars continuously lose mass in the final stages of life. The star is waging a tug-of-war between gravity and  to avoid self-destruction. As the star begins to run out of fuel, its radiation pressure decreases, and gravity begins to take hold. Stellar material succumbs to gravity and falls inward. It heats up and is explosively ejected into the surrounding interstellar space. This process continues until enough mass is lost and the star reaches a stable state.

Hubble Takes a Closer Look at its 31st Anniversary Image
Credit: ESA/Hubble and NASA, A. Nota, C. Britt

The spectacular nebula surrounding AG Carinae formed by material ejected from the star during several of its past outbursts. The nebula is approximately 10,000 years old, and the observed velocity of the gas is approximately 43 miles per second. While this nebula looks like a ring, it is in fact a hollow shell whose center was cleared of gas and dust by a powerful stellar wind traveling roughly 124 miles per second. The gas (composed mostly of ionized hydrogen and nitrogen) in these images appears as a thick bright red ring, which appears doubled in places—possibly the result of several outbursts colliding into each other. The , seen here in blue, formed in clumps, bubbles, and filaments and was shaped by the stellar wind.

Scientists who observed the star and its surrounding  note that the ring is not perfectly spherical. It appears to have bipolar symmetry. This could mean the mechanism producing the outburst may be the result of a disk in the center, or the star may have a companion (known as a binary star). An alternative and simpler theory is that, like many massive stars, AG Carinae may rotate very fast.

Hubble captures giant star on the edge of destruction
Provided by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center 
NASA Hubble Images Reveal Final Moments of Dying Star in Rare Event [PHOTOS]

The NASA Hubble Space Telescope celebrated its 31st anniversary observing the final moments of dying star. AG Carinae, estimated to be 70 times more massive than the Earth's Sun, was captured in two spectacular photos.
 PHOTO : M. WEISS/NASA/CXC/GETTY IMAGES

The NASA Hubble Space Telescope celebrated its 31st anniversary observing the final moments of a dying star. AG Carinae, estimated to be 70 times more massive than the Earth's Sun, was captured in two spectacular photos.

The massive star is one of the brightest stars seen in the solar system. It is a few million years old and resides about 20,000 light-years away. NASA classified AG Carinae as a Luminous Blue Variable because of its hot and blue light brightness. Such stars are rare because very few grow to be so massive.

In the photo captured, AG Carinae erupted with a shell of gas and dust. NASA explained in detail the events surrounding the star.



Final Moments of Dying Star: NASA Hubble Images


There are many interesting and observable facts about AG Carinae. In the photo tweeted above, ionized hydrogen and nitrogen emissions create the red shell. The second image captured with a blue ring is the dust that shines around the core, reflected by starlight. The whole nebula is approximately five light-years wide, which means a distance from the Sun to the next nearest star, Proxima Centauri.

According to NASA, the circular formation around the nebula is created by a galactic tug-of-war between AG Carinae's gravity and radiation, which would continue until the star reaches a stable state.

To summarize, when the star loses radiation, gravity pulls nearby stellar material inward. This heats up the star, which explosively ejects the energy, creating the beautiful rings. Note that no other stars exist in the space between AG Carinae and its outer rings. All the material between is neatly expelled during the explosion.

It is worth noting that AG Carinae and its nebula ring are not perfectly spherical. Astronomers think that powerful stellar winds influenced its shape during an explosion. A YouTube explanation by NASA is embedded below.


NASA Hubble Space Telescope 31st Anniversary

The astronomical event was analyzed and explained thanks to Hubble Telescope's observations on the star from 2020 and 2014. The photo captured was taken from Hubble's Wide Field Planetary Camera 2, installed in 1994.

Despite being decades old, Hubble continues to contribute several unique and exciting space discoveries. NASA posted a Hubble Trivia explaining some of its achievements:
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope was launched on April 24, 1990 and has made over 1.5 million observations about 48,000 celestial objects.

The 31-year-old telescope made more than 181,000 orbits around Earth, totaling over 4.5 billion miles.

Hubble observations have produced more than 169 terabytes of data available for present and future generations of researchers.

Astronomers using Hubble data have published more than 18,000 scientific papers, with more than 900 of those papers published in 2020.

Fortunately, space researchers said that Hubble is in pristine condition. The iconic space observatory should still contribute many more discoveries in the years to come.

Related Article: NASA Reveals Plan to Crash Spaceship to Deflect Massive Asteroid: Full Simulation, Mission Launch Date and MORE


 

Something big just hit Jupiter

Something big Just hit Jupiter

In 1994, the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9) impacted Jupiter, which had captured the comet shortly before (and broken apart by its gravity). The event became a media circus as it was the first direct observation of an extraterrestrial collision of Solar System objects. The impact was so powerful that it left scars that endured for months and were more discernible than Jupiter's Great Red Spot.

Since then, astronomers have observed multiple objects impacting Jupiter, and it is expected that such impacts happen all the time (though unobserved). On September 13, 2021, at 22:39:30 UTC (06:39:30 PM EDT; 03:39 PM:30 PDT), another impact was observed by multiple astronomers around the world. Images and a video of the impact were captured by members of Sociรฉtรฉ Lorraine d'Astronomie (SLA) in France.

The impact was reported by Brazilian amateur astronomer Jose Luis Pereira and confirmed a day later by Harald Paleske from Langendorf, Germany. At the time, Paleske had been taking a video of the transit of Io's shadow when the event occurred, which appeared as a two-second flash. Upon reviewing the footage, he ruled out the possibility that the event happened closer to Earth (with Jupiter merely being the backdrop).

After a thorough examination, Paleske determined that the impact happened at Jovian latitude 106.9° (CM1), longitude +3.8°, and timed it to 22:39:27 UTC on Sept. 13th. The impact was independently observed by two teams of French amateur astronomers with the SLA. According to a statement issued by the SLA, the two teams consisted of:

"Jean-Paul Arnould from his observatory in Villey-le-sec with the C11 telescope of the SLA [and] a team made up of Thibaut Humbert, Stรฉphane Barrรฉ, Alexis Desmougin, and Didier Walliang at the Astroqueyras observatory in Saint-Vรฉran, with the 62 cm diameter telescope Other people around the world have observed the same phenomenon. This is the first time that so many people (currently 9) have captured this type of event."

Something big Just hit Jupiter
Still image of the impact. Credit: H. Paleske

Thanks to the DeTeCt software/project, the amateur and professional astronomical community was issued a wide alert that allowed for rapid responses. All across the world, instruments that were aimed at Jupiter were consulted to see if they also recorded the light flash on the Jovian gas giant. The SLA also sent the data to Marc Delcroix, a Senior Research Scientist at the NTT Communication Science Laboratories' Media Information Laboratory in Kyoto, Japan.

Based on the images and video provided observers, the object's diameter is estimated at 20 meters (ft). Similar to what happened with SL-9, this object is believed to be the remnant of a larger comet or asteroid that was captured by Jupiter's gravity that broke up shortly before the impact took place. This information and any updates on the event can be found at Delcroix's website, who indicated that this impact could be the brightest ever observed by  (save for the SL-9 impact).

"Aside Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts in 1994, never an impact was so well covered!" he wrote. Over the coming days and weeks, Delcroix and the astronomical community will examine the amateur videos to learn more about the lightcurves the impact generated. From this, they hope to obtain information on the amount of energy released, the dynamics of the impact, the physical characteristics of the impactor itself.

"Many thanks to every amateur who was implied in this event, whether discovering it, observing it, looking for it in his capture without finding it, or spreading the alert (there were hundreds of shares). Special thanks to the amateurs of the French astrosurf forums who helped me a lot to find out information on discoveries or new observations. We amateurs demonstrated our force as a community, showed our motivation, dedication and experience through this great event!"

This event beautifully illustrates how far astronomy has come in recent years. Whereas impacts with Jupiter were once thought to be rare, they are now understood to be a regular occurrence. With modern opportunities for data-sharing, networking, and collaboration between amateurs and professionals, events that would have otherwise gone unnoticed are being detected with regular frequency.


Read Also: Jupiter Asteroid Impact Video 2021: Watch as Astronomers Capture Ultra Rare Event!

Stony-iron meteor caused August impact flash at Jupiter

Source Universe Today 
New York State signs 25-year contract with Hydro-Quebec as the state moves away from fossil fuel energy


The Canadian Press Published Monday, September 20, 2021 

Quebec Premier Francois Legault feels the new deal between Hydro-Quebec and New York State could reduce greenhouse gas emissions be a huge degree as well as make billions of dollars for the province.
SOURCE: Francois Legault/Twitter

MONTREAL -- New York State has awarded a 25-year contract to Hydro-Quรฉbec, the provincially-owned company's largest export contract.

Starting in 2025, Hydro-Quรฉbec will supply nearly 1,250 megawatts of hydroelectricity, which represents the electrical consumption of about one million homes.

Fossil fuels account for nearly 85 per cent of the region's electricity supply. The state wants renewable energy to account for 70 percent of its energy consumption by 2030.

Related Stories
Plante administration unveils plan to increase electric transportation in Montreal

The announcement was made by Governor Kathy Hochul during New York's Climate Week.




"New York State is taking a bold step toward decarbonization," said Hydro-Quรฉbec President and CEO Sophie Brochu in a statement.

Hydro-Quebec did not disclose the potential revenue it would receive from the contract, but it could be worth tens of billions.

On Twitter, Premier Franรงois Legault called it a "deal in principle worth over $20 billion over 25 years."

"This is huge news for the environment. Fossil fuel energy will be replaced by renewable energy," said the premier.


This is the largest export contract in Hydro-Quรฉbec's history. Massachusetts has already signed a 20-year agreement for 9.45 terawatts.

The Champlain Hudson Power Express (CHPE) project involves the construction of approximately 545 kilometres of underground and sub-river transmission line between the Canada-U.S. border and New York City.

A 60-kilometre portion will also be built in Quebec. The Quebec-owned corporation will co-own this portion with the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake (MCK), the elected body of the Kanien'kehรก:ka (Mohawk) community on Montreal's South Shore.

The MCK said in a news release that New York wanted to "ensure its selection would not impede Indigenous rights."

“This is an historic accomplishment for Kahnawร :ke and a huge step forward regarding the relationship with Hydro-Quรฉbec," said MCK grand chief Kahsennenhawe Sky-Deer. "It is proof that when Kahnawร :ke’s rights and interests are considered in a meaningful way, it provides an opportunity for a valuable and innovative alliance."

The hydro line will be built on disputed territory that is the subject of an ongoing Kahnawake land grievance.

Hydro-Quรฉbec spokesperson Lynn St-Laurent said the contract is a "win-win for Quebec and New York."




"Not only does it provide a new source of revenue for the utility, but it also allows New York State to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. It's a huge climate gain," she added. "Greenhouse gases know no borders, so what's good for our neighbours is good for Quebecers."

Hydro-Quรฉbec's project avoids the emission of 3.9 million metric tons of greenhouse gases.

"It's like taking 44 per cent of the vehicles in New York City off the road," says St-Laurent.

"This is great news for the environment," said Quebec Environment Minister Benoit Charrette. "Quebec is fully assuming its leadership in the fight against climate change. We are gradually realizing our desire to become the battery of the northeastern United States."

-- This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on Sept. 20, 2021.

-- with reporting from CTV Montreal's Daniel J. Rowe.
The road to net-zero transport could cost Asia over $12 trillion, report finds
PUBLISHED MON, SEP 20 2021

Charmaine Jacob

CLIMATE

China, Japan and South Korea will spend an estimated $12.4 trillion to achieve net-zero carbon emissions in their transport systems, according to an ING report.

Achieving net-zero carbon emissions in China’s transportations sector could cost $11 trillion, or “1.8% of GDP per year through to 2060.”

China’s marine industry would require the most investments to be entirely zero carbon, with the demand for sea freight is estimated to be around 120% of today’s levels by 2060.


An overpass during the rush hour in the north district of Qingdao City, in China’s Shandong province.
Cheunghyo | Moment | Getty Images

Three of Asia’s largest economies will spend an estimated $12 trillion to achieve net-zero carbon emissions in their transport industries, according to Dutch bank ING.

China, Japan and South Korea account for almost two-thirds of all carbon dioxide emissions in Asia-Pacific, and approximately a third of global emissions, said the bank.

Both Japan and South Korea have pledged to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and China by 2060. Net-zero emissions refer to removing more greenhouses gases from the atmosphere than produced.

The $12.4 trillion cost estimate is “equivalent to more than 90% of China’s 2020 GDP,” according to Robert Carnell, ING’s Asia-Pacific head of research and author of the report.

It will cover the electricity generating capacity needed by countries to supply new fleets of battery electric vehicles, electrified rail, hydrogen-powered trucks, sustainable aviation fueled planes, and ammonia-burning ships, he wrote.

The $12.4 trillion price tag doesn’t include infrastructure spending to replace existing vehicle fleets, install electric vehicle charging points, or store new fuels in the industry, he noted.

With up to 30% of total energy consumption coming from the transport systems of the three countries, they would need to act fast and adopt sustainable solutions to ensure their goals are within reach, said ING.

If China, Japan and South Korea start their energy transition process today and spread out their efforts over the next 30-40 years, the cost to achieve net-zero carbon emissions in transportation will be manageable, the bank said.
China’s race to net-zero

China is the world’s biggest carbon dioxide emitter and achieving net-zero carbon emissions will cost its transportation sector $11 trillion — or “1.8% of GDP per year through to 2060,” the report said.


Citing the 2020 China Renewable Energy Outlook, ING pointed out that passenger car transport in China will more than double to 450 million by 2050 — from 220 million vehicles in 2018.

China has seen rapid growth in the electric vehicle space, and ING predicts that if the country fully adopts battery plug-in electric vehicles by 2060, the total energy demand from passenger vehicles by 2050 could decrease significantly.

China’s marine industry would require the most investments to achieve net-zero carbon, ING said, adding that the demand for sea freight is estimated to grow to around 120% of today’s levels by 2060.

However, it would be impossible to achieve carbon neutrality without substituting diesel and liquefied natural gas with green ammonia, hence incurring extra cost of $3.7 billion and an additional 433 gigawatts of electricity generating capacity.
Japan and South Korea’s carbon neutral goals


AUDIO


Both Japan and South Korea have set their sights on 2050, and aim to reach their carbon neutral goals by then.

It will cost Japan $1 trillion to transition to a net-zero plan for its transport system, in terms of the electricity generating capacity required, according to ING’s forecast. This accounts for “about 20% of current Japanese GDP” — but that number can fall to “0.6% GDP per annum when spread between now and 2050.”′

The report said Japan has made little progress in decarbonizing its economy as fossil fuels still make up more than two-thirds of the country’s primary energy supply. In a positive light, this means “Japan has a lot of low-hanging fruit to exploit in the transition process offering the prospect of rapid progress.”

ING estimated that the total green energy capacity costs for transforming South Korea’s transport sector toward a net-zero carbon future would cost around $400 billion, or 0.6% of today’s GDP per year when spread over the next 30 years.

Although the cost countries will have to spend on transitioning their transportation systems can be “immensely depressing,” it’s important to remember that “all of this spending is going to show up as GDP,” Carnell wrote