Wednesday, September 09, 2020

Covid-19 conspiracy theories pose a danger to public health that cannot be dismissed lightly – Martyn McLaughlin
A Scottish group protesting against wearing masks and the use of vaccines is couching its hardline conspiracy theories with moderate messages and familiar slogans. That should concern all of us, writes Martyn Mclaughlin

Tuesday, 8th September 2020
Paddy Hogg addresses the Saving Scotland rally outside the Scottish Parliament. 
Picture: Lisa Ferguson


There is an understandable temptation to dismiss or downplay the anti-mask, anti-vaccine Saving Scotland demonstration held outside the Scottish Parliament at the weekend, which railed against so-called globalist hoaxes and sought to propagate conspiratorial tropes involving Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation, which have been circulating online for months.


With lockdown restrictions tightening across swathes of the country, there is an appreciable fatigue and frustration at how Covid-19 continues to turn ordinary life upside down. People are seeking out respite from a chaotic reality. There will be several more detours and delays on Scotland’s route map out of the pandemic before we can say with any confidence that the home straight is in sight.


The Holyrood protest, however, was not simply the symptom of public irritation. Several hundred people turned out to hear dangerous misinformation being peddled, with speakers attempting to refute the scientific evidence for social distancing. But more than that, it provided a platform for those who pointed the finger at Scotland’s political class, and called for MSPs to be held to account at next year’s Holyrood elections.


Anti-mask Covid-19 Holyrood demo organised by councillor who claims 'no one' is being infected


What made this particular rallying call striking was the fact it emanated from an elected politician who has held public office for eight years – Paddy Hogg, who represents the Cumbernauld East ward on North Lanarkshire Council. I ran a story on Monday detailing how Mr Hogg was the ringmaster of Saturday’s event, during which he chided the mainstream media for refusing to give Saving Scotland’s views prominence. At the time of writing, more than 24 hours have passed since I emailed Mr Hogg and left him a voicemail. He has yet to reply.


Perhaps he is too busy developing what he calls his “different narrative” around coronavirus. Or perhaps he is simply attending to his public duties. As well as promoting conspiratorial nonsense and alternative health theories, Mr Hogg is a member of North Lanarkshire Council’s community safety partnership forum, and its education and families committee.


The fine people of Cumbernauld will have to wait until 2022 before deciding whether Mr Hogg is fit to continue to represent them. In the meantime, it is galling that the local authority has not condemned his reckless views, instead observing that councillors are free to express their own opinions. That is an established and valued protocol, but at a time when a pandemic is raging, with a sharp spike in cases in the very region Mr Hogg serves, it seems a meek and negligent response on the part of a public body with myriad statutory duties.


Like many who have passed through Motherwell, Mr Hogg may in any case aspire to greater things. He has promised that he and the Saving Scotland movement will be waging more “campaign battles” in the future, which is an interesting choice of phrase. What exactly is the end game of those who seek to harness the growing distrust among coronavirus ‘truthers’. Could it mutate into, or inspire, a political force?















If the very idea seems laughably implausible, consider how absurd it would have sounded back in 2015 to air the notion that, in just five years’ time, the president of the United States would be praising the followers of QAnon, a group which claims 5G mobile networks are spreading the coronavirus, and insists a cabal of Satanic politicians and A-list celebrities are working with governments the world over to engage in child sex abuse.

Much is made of the role of the internet and social media in furthering disinformation and conspiracy theories, and while that is one of the defining dilemmas of our age, the Covid-19 example is not exceptional. The psychological trigger for such nonsense is as old as the hills.

A key element is what is known as group attachment; in other words, people side with factions, believing their group’s aims to be just and right, and those of the opposing side to be malicious and deceitful. It’s a simple enough conceit, and a recognisable one in the hyper-partisan battleground of Scottish politics.

It has been interesting – and concerning – to see the language with which anti-mask and anti-vaccine groups have been amplifying their messages. Buzzwords and well-worn rallying calls from the independence movement have been co-opted and weaponised. ‘Freedom over fear’ is one slogan mentioned on the Saving Scotland Facebook page.

The familiarity – and indeed, the power – of such phrases can garner unthinking support, particularly among those already inclined to turn their backs on our shared reality at a time when there are no straightforward answers. There is also a danger of conspiracists using more moderate messages to draw in an audience and create the illusion of credibility.

The Saving Scotland group is a good example. On its newly launched website, it makes a series of demands of the Scottish Government. The mix includes a slew of suitably vague and middle-of-the-road behests, such as a national reconstruction plan for jobs and the economy, and a national campaign of food independence, realised through the creation of thousands of allotments. Granted, the last one sounds a bit like on-the-hoof, Thick of It-style policy plucking, but it could sit easily in a mainstream political party’s manifesto without raising an eyelid.

Which is not to say they would obscure the group’s primary motivations – an insistence that there be no mandatory wearing of face masks or Covid-19 vaccinations, and a call for an independent inquiry into “WiFi radiation health damage in schools” – but they certainly serve to sugar the pill.

It may be that Mr Hogg and Saving Scotland do not seek to field candidates joining their chorus of moon howling. It may be that they don’t have to. Conspiracy narratives are being shoehorned into the mainstream political discourse across established democracies, and we should not be so complacent as to presume that we are somehow immune.

There is no simple solution to countering this, but those peddling wild, conspiratorial views which endanger others must be explicitly and repeatedly condemned, especially if they occupy public office.





US election: Donald Trump's Soviet-style personality cult is a dystopian nightmare for America – Henry McLeish

After a Republican Convention was described by one commentator as a ‘culture war grievance fest’, it is clear the US election will be a choice between hate and decency, fear and hope, writes Henry McLeish

By Henry McLeish
Monday, 31st August 2020, 4:45 pm
Supporters of Donald Trump held a car parade Saturday from Clackamas to Portland, Oregon (Picture: Paula Bronstein/AP)
IS  THAT RICK PERRY SURE LOOKS LIKE HIM

Last week, a surreal Republican Convention confirmed President Trump as the official Republican candidate for the 2020 election, reaffirmed his absolute control over the once “Grand Old Party” and exposed how the power of populism, personality and propaganda is being ruthlessly used to degrade America, devalue its democracy and deceive voters.

A headline in the magazine Vanity Fair suggested the convention was a “culture war grievance fest”. Trump is the master of tapping into victimhood. This political freakshow, more reminiscent of Stalin’s Soviet Union or Kim Jong Un’s North Korean regime, portrayed Joe Biden as an enemy of America, accusing him of seeking to rig the election and offering a dark, menacing, dystopian socialist future.

Among his supporters, Trump is worshipped as the saviour of Western civilisation, “the bodyguard” of a troubled world, the protector of America and, for some, chosen by God to lead the most precious country in the world to the promised land. Relentless propaganda is disguising the obvious truth of a President and party bonded together and completely detached from reality and totally dependent on a seemingly immovable base of loyalists.





Even more remarkable, this was a Republican convention without a policy platform. Four years ago, there were 54 pages of policy, but now this ego-driven President is more convinced of his unique policy, first mooted in 2016 that, “I alone can fix America”!


The first Republican Party Convention took place in Philadelphia in 1856. But at least they got down to business and adopted a platform of formal opposition to the extension of slavery and supported Congress “in prohibiting those twin relics of barbarism – polygamy in the Mormon settlements, and slavery everywhere”. The party of principle, purpose, and policy no longer exists.

Biden is not left wing

The pre-convention publicity offered something different. There were to be daily themes – land of opportunity, land of promise, land of heroes and, for Trump’s acceptance speech, land of greatness.Each of the four days produced contributions from Trump and his family. The White House, usually free from party political campaigning, hosted Trump’s acceptance speech on Thursday night. Each day, highly divisive figures were wheeled out to speak directly to Trump’s base and to ignore and insult the rest of the country.

But this Republican Convention always had limited focus: to galvanise support for the ‘cult of the dear leader’, regardless of his record and behaviour; to demonise Joe Biden and attack his mental health. Trump, the self-proclaimed “stable genius”, is not in a strong position to judge whether someone is more or less unhinged than he is; to lie about the economic achievements of his presidency, despite the worst economic crisis in US history, with 31 million Americans out of work, that has left his claims in ruins; to attack Biden and Kamala Harris for being in the pocket of the “far left” of the Democratic party – Biden is not left wing; or to evangelise about how he has protected America by becoming a foreign policy rebel, ignoring the fact that its status in the world has diminished.

The convention was, unsurprisingly, light on apologies or remorse or indeed discussion on Trump’s catastrophic handling of the coronavirus pandemic – for him the “China virus ... is what it is” – as deaths are heading towards a staggering 200,000 with nearly six million cases.

Absurdly cynical

It is always useful to remember that Trump is not the fictional character in some Orwell or Atwood novel of the future. This is the nightmare of America today.

The party conventions are over. The general election, just over two months away, has officially begun, and the tactics are clear. Trump wants to exploit fear, hate, cultural differences, identity and intolerance and win the election by pitting his largely white minority base against multiracial, majority America.

Biden seeks instead to unite and heal the country and restore respect and trust and the belief in the idea of one America. This election sees the ego and autocracy of ‘super-celebrity’ Trump take on the empathy, decency and hope of Biden. There is no common ground in this election.

America is faced with a choice between actual reality and Trump’s alternative reality. Trump is asking voters to erase from their minds the last six months of unimaginable chaos resulting from the pandemic health crisis and economic crash. Donald Trump Jr captured the essence of an absurdly cynical convention when he said, “it’s almost like this election is shaping up to be church, work and school versus rioting, looting and vandalism”.

Writing in his book, The Soul of America, Jon Meacham said that, “in the Presidency of Donald Trump, the alienated are being mobilised afresh by changing demography, by broadening conceptions of identity”.

Trump cannot see the racial injustice

Trump is interested in the fate of white America and his own, and that means fostering fear and shunning hope. In his first inaugural address in 1861, Abraham Lincoln said: “We are not enemies, but friends. Though passions may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearth stone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.” Biden is best described as being guided by the “better angels of our nature”.

The President is immune to racial injustice, black lives matter and honest protest. For Trump, these are law and order issues to be used to deepen the fears and heighten the anger of his base. Dystopian imagery is captured in his every speech, in his talk of “the smouldering ruins of Minneapolis, the violent anarchy of Portland and the blood stained sidewalks of Chicago”: little comfort to the family of yet another black man, Jacob Blake, shot by police in Wisconsin last week.

America’s nightmare is stark. Trump has a stranglehold on his base and consequently the country. His base represents a minority of voters. In 2016, 56 per cent of US citizens turned out to vote. Of that vote, 46 per cent voted for Trump.

This is a democratic crisis where less than half of just over half of the adult population supported the President. But, partly because of the piece of absurdity that is the Electoral College, this was enough to put Trump in the White House.

Out of his depth, with no scope for improvement, and dragging the country under, the President should reflect on the words of JF Kennedy, who said, “only the President represents the national interest”, and “upon him alone converge all the needs and aspirations of all parts of the country... all nations of the world”.





Donald Trump Nobel Peace Price: Why US President's nomination is a far-right publicity stunt
It is regarded as the world’s pre-eminent honour, conferred upon the greatest minds who have dedicated their lives to the pursuit of progress, justice, and a lasting peace.

By Martyn Mclaughlin
Wednesday, 9th September 2020
President Donald Trump has now been nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize - by the same right-wing politician. Picture: AP/Evan Vucci

Thanks to its wide-ranging and easily-exploited nomination process, however, the Nobel Peace Prize is also a vehicle that is prone to manipulation by those seeking a quick burst of publicity.

If there is anything at all newsworthy about the fact the US president Donald Trump has been nominated for the 2021 award - a development that is being widely reported around the world - it has only to do with the person who put his name forward.

In Mr Trump’s case, that individual is Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a far-right Norwegian parliamentarian and member of the country’s Progress Party. His name may not be familiar to international audiences, but until today Mr Tybring-Gjedde’s highest-profile action was, well, nominating Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Yes, that’s right. In 2018, the 57-year-old and his colleague, Per-Willy Amundsen, nominated Mr Trump for the same honour, citing the “huge and important step" he had taken towards peace in the Korean peninsula.

This time around, Mr Tybring-Gjedde - who is fiercely anti-immigration and was investigated by police after he delivered a controversial speech on multiculturalism - cited the 73-year-old’s efforts to broker peace between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

If you are starting to notice a pattern, it is entirely deliberate. Mr Tybring-Gjedde has already appeared on Fox News - Mr Trump’s network of choice - to talk him up.

Prominent Trump supporters in the US, including Mark Levin, Lou Dobbs, and Dean Browning, have also been sharing news articles reporting the nomination and offering their congratulations.

For an American audience idly flicking through their social media feeds without the time or inclination to read further, it looks as if Mr Trump is about to receive the ultimate honour. In truth, it is little more than a gimmick which will puff up his ego and distract from day to day events.

It did not take Mr Trump long to greet the commendation with his characteristic reserve and modesty, tweeting multiple links to coverage of his nomination, and offering thanks to well-wishers.

There seems little doubt that he covets the prize. Only last year, he claimed Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe had nominated him for the award. Mr Abe, it should be pointed out, has never confirmed this was the case.

Either way, Mr Trump did not win, but the prospect of a sitting prime minister nominating him - instead of a hardline parliamentarian on the fringes of Norwegian democracy - would have lent his candidacy greater weight.

Which brings us to the fundamental problem with the nominations system for the Nobel Peace Prize - it is a meaningless indicator of false glory.

The roll call of people eligible to submit a nomination is not inexhaustible, but it is extensive, and it extends far beyond individuals like Mr Tybring-Gjedde, who happen to serve on a national parliament or assembly.

That particular category alone captures tens of thousands of politicians around the world, many of whom - like Mr Tybring-Gjedde - have forged a career from divisive rhetoric and cheap publicity stunts.

As well as parliamentarians and government ministers, the nomination process is open to university professors, professors emeriti and associate professors of history, social sciences, law, philosophy, theology, and religion, as well as university rectors and university directors or their equivalents.

The academic field alone spans a field of potential nominators as broad as several hundred thousand-strong. In the US alone, research by the National Centre for Education Statistics indicated that there are more than 300,000 individuals who hold the status of professor or associate professor.

While the actual award itself continues to be held in the highest esteem, the result of the wide-open nominations process has allowed a miscellany of tyrants and celebrities to make the shortlist down the years.

The Norwegian Nobel Institute says that the international scope of the award and the “broad eligibility” of nominators helps to ensure that “a great variety of candidates from all corners of the world” are brought forward to the committee’s attention every year.

That is indeed true. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin received five nominations between them. In more recent times, Vladimir Putin has also been nominated for the prize. Elsewhere, the late pop star, Michael Jackson, was also nominated, part of a trend which has seen the number of nominees swell to more than 300 in any given year.

Generally, however, it is difficult to know exactly who has been nominated, unless the nominator breaks cover and makes it public. Otherwise, the complete list of eligible nominees of any year’s prizes is kept a closely guarded secret, and is not disclosed for 50 years, a restriction imposed by the Nobel statutes.

It barely requires pointing out, but neither the Fuhrer, the King of Pop, or any of the other nominees above went on to win the prize, and the same fate may befall Mr Trump, whose extensive list of personal honours includes the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor, a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, and membership of the WWE Hall of Fame.

If he is unable to add the Nobel to that list, he can at least console himself with the knowledge that he will be in good company. Previous occupants of the White House, including Taft, Harding, Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower, were all nominated for the prize.

Alas, all were destined to remain bridesmaids. And all were denied the chance to make the WWE Hall of Fame.

Fallen Troops Send Anti-Trump Message From Beyond The Grave

 In New Jim Carrey Art

The actor hit back at Trump's reported insults of U.S. service members killed in combat.

\Image   


Jim Carrey hit back at President Donald Trump’s reported insults of America’s war dead with his latest cartoon.

The actor-artist drew a headstone with a message from fallen troops reading: “We were ‘losers’ and ‘suckers’ according to Trump, honor our fallen don’t vote for that chump.” Carrey captioned the image with the hashtag #BidenHarris.

The Atlantic reported last week that Trump, during a 2018 visit to France, referred to U.S. service members who were killed in combat during World War I as “suckers” and “losers.” The insults were later confirmed by multiple media outlets, including Fox News. The president denied making them.

The latest cartoon from Carrey, whose anti-Trump art has in recent years been extensively covered by HuffPost, came just days after he penned a blistering essay for The Atlantic in which he warned the U.S. “faces catastrophe” if Trump beats Democratic rival Joe Biden in the 2020 election.

“In November, we must vote in historic numbers, gathering all the ‘snowflakes’ until there’s a blizzard on Capitol Hill that no corrupt politician can survive,” Carrey wrote. “We must vote for decency, humanity, and a way of life that once again captures the imagination of kids all over the world — kids like me.”




Liberals & hawks accuse Trump of ‘attack’ on military after he says Pentagon chiefs ‘fight wars to keep arms dealers healthy'

8 Sep, 2020 

FILE PHOTOS. © Reuters / Brendan McDermid; Reuters / Sarah Silbiger
Follow RT 

US President Donald Trump accused the Pentagon’s top brass of starting wars in order to hand billions to arms makers, drawing shocked reactions from his liberal critics and foreign policy hawks – some playing both roles at once.


“I'm not saying the military's in love with me – the soldiers are,” the president said at a White House press conference on Monday.


The top people in the Pentagon probably aren't because they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay healthy.



Trump: "I'm not saying the military's in love with me. The soldiers are. The top people in the Pentagon probably aren't because they want to do nothing but fight wars, so all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy" pic.twitter.com/uu1UnBnHbT— CBS News (@CBSNews) September 7, 2020

Trump’s comments come as his latest response to a September 3 story in the Atlantic, which alleged the president had denigrated fallen American soldiers throughout his time in office, reportedly dubbing them “losers” and “suckers.” Trump has repeatedly denied the allegations, which were based on the claims of anonymous officials and aides, reiterating on Monday: “Who would say a thing like that? Only an animal would say a thing like that.”


His scathing critique of the Pentagon’s top leadership prompted a new wave of controversy, however, as a number of media pundits, Democratic lawmakers and bellicose foreign policy commentators lined up to voice horror at the “unprecedented public attack” on the military.

“Perhaps [Defense Secretary Mark Esper] should defend the honor of those with whom he serves at the Pentagon? He has little to lose, since he's probably going to be fired anyway. Why not go out on a high note?”tweeted neoconservative luminary Bill Kristol, a top booster of the disastrous US invasion of Iraq and a vocal #NeverTrumper.



Dear @realDonaldTrump: You have attacked servicemembers who died in war; Gold Star families; POWs; and now military leadership. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?You are the Commander in Chief. Please stop denigrating our military.Also when will you condemn Putin?#TrumpPressConferencehttps://t.co/wSnjuCCJ5n— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) September 7, 2020



Everyone is entitled to their opinion about the US military. But this comes during 9-11 commemoration here at Pentagon & military bases around the world. Generals have held dying troops in their arms, buried them at Arlington and 19 years later still comfort families. https://t.co/8W6vom3gsF— Barbara Starr (@barbarastarrcnn) September 7, 2020



Wait, so after insisting he'd never insult military veterans, Trump goes on live television and accuses military leaders of being warmongers?— Josh Campbell (@joshscampbell) September 7, 2020

The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., also weighed into the fray, arguing that a “permanent moratorium” on retired generals serving on the boards of defense contractors – a phenomenon known as the ‘revolving door’ – would “end the endless wars immediately.” He pointed to a series of former officials who left their posts in the Pentagon for cushy jobs in the weapons industry, where retired officers often work as lobbyists helping to grease the skids for lucrative government contracts.



If you want to end the endless wars immediately put a permanent moratorium on retired General’s serving on the boards of defense contractors. We would be out of Afghanistan by Wednesday. https://t.co/99QkLgZ7Uj— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) September 7, 2020

Between 2008 and 2018, at least 380 high-ranking Pentagon officials were hired by top defense contractors after leaving public office, including 25 generals, 9 admirals, 43 lieutenant generals and 23 vice admirals, according to a report by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO). Many became lobbyists, board members, executives or consultants for firms such as Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman.



What's next, calling out military brass for retiring to plum positions on military industrial company boards and then appearing on cable news to drum up support for war without disclosing their conflicts of interest? No, sir! I won't hear of it!!!!— Eoin Higgins (@EoinHiggins_) September 7, 2020

Some netizens, as well as progressive lawmaker Ro Khanna (D-California), took up a wholly different criticism of the president, arguing that while Trump is correct about the Pentagon, he himself has been “complicit” in expanding US military budgets and feeding billions to arms dealers.

“This is correct but Trump has increased the military budget and the amount of bombs we drop, which means larger profits for defense contractors. So he’s right but he is also complicit,” one user wrote.


I know you do not believe facts matter. But if you are really opposed to companies that make bombs and planes making money, why have you proposed over $140 billion MORE in defense spending than Obama, including a slush fund for endless wars. https://t.co/W18IN0WGFM— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) September 7, 2020


"President Trump has accused US military leaders of seeking to start wars to boost the profits of defense contractors"Aren't there historical facts to back this up?Ever heard of the USS Maine?Or the Gulf of Tonkin?How about 'weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.' pic.twitter.com/FVgVmDhPrT— Cognitive Dissident-I Believe 6% of What CDC Says (@farmingganja) September 7, 2020

People are so focused on saying he’s wrong that they don’t realize the real issue - he’s right, but he’s made the problem WORSE. He’s given them MORE money. Only Trump could get away with calling out a problem that he’s contributing to— Abolish the DSCC (@bluefacebabyyy_) September 7, 2020

Despite his withering attack on the Pentagon’s revolving door, Trump has frequently boasted of “rebuilding” the US armed forces with vast military expenditures, which continue to outspend the world’s next 11 largest defense budgets combined. He has also repeatedly touted multi-billion dollar weapons sales to Saudi Arabia and other allies, insisting they support American jobs and bring money into the country.


Soaring US ‘defense’ budget helped drive world military spending to 10-year high in 2019
15 Feb, 2020


FILE PHOTO: US Navy sailors move aircraft from an elevator into the hangar bay of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in the South China Sea. © Reuters / Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Michael Hogan / US Navy Handou
Follow RT on

Global military expenditures in 2019 saw their largest increase in 10 years, propelled in no small part by skyrocketing US “defense” budgets, which continue to dwarf some of the world’s next largest spenders combined.


Military spending among 170 countries jumped by 4 percent in 2019 compared to the prior year, sending the total to its highest level in a decade, according to an annual assessment released on Friday by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).



Global defence spending has reached its highest level in a decade, IISS #MilitaryBalance data published today shows. Find out more in The Military Balance 2020 – OUT NOW | https://t.co/4sQPYYuTVVpic.twitter.com/OL2ZPfvRIn— IISS News (@IISS_org) February 14, 2020

While the new report attributes the soaring pay-outs to an “unstable international security environment,” Washington’s massive $53.4 billion “defense” hike – roughly equal to the UK’s entire military budget – played an outsized role in driving the numbers to their current 10-year record high.ALSO ON RT.COM‘Too much money invested in war’: US defense industry drives global military spending spree

China placed second on the list, spending around $181 billion last year as Beijing continues to modernize and expand its armed forces. Compared to 2018, both Washington and Beijing’s military budgets grew by some 6.6 percent, but while growth was similar between the two countries, the trends are “diverging” and the US is widening the gap, according to IISS research fellow Lucie Béraud-Sudreau.

“The budget increase in the US was the largest in 10 years, and spending has increased year-on-year since US President Donald Trump took office,” Béraud-Sudreau wrote in a blog post. “While spending is still rising in China, the pace of growth is decelerating.”



‘Nominal increase in US defence spending of US$53.4bn between 2018 and 2019 almost matched the UK’s entire 2019 defence budget of US$54.8bn, and is equivalent to the 7th-largest defence budget in the world’ | @chipmanj#MilitaryBalance#MSC2020https://t.co/4DNxTV6Y2mpic.twitter.com/1653bVxxbG— IISS News (@IISS_org) February 14, 2020

With total US military expenditures hitting nearly $685 billion in 2019, Washington continues to out-spend 11 countries combined – China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, India, the UK, France, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Brazil, and Italy. Though euphemistically termed “defense spending,” much of the US outlays finance a vast network of overseas bases and foreign troop deployments, some of them – such as in Iraq and Afghanistan – ongoing for the better part of two decades.

Military budgets in Europe have seen marked increases as Washington demanded its NATO partners contribute more to their own defense. However, US allies “still have some way to go before they would be able to act effectively without US military assistance,” the report notes, as it is unclear that the spending increases in 2019 “will significantly improve military capabilities in the near term.”

‘Too much money invested in war’: US defense industry drives global military spending spree

30 Apr, 2019 

FILE PHOTO. © Reuters / US Navy /Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Z.A. Lan
Follow RT on

Global military expenditures reached their peak in 2018, and the driving force behind this increase is the growing appetite of the US military-industrial complex rather than real threats, analysts say.


The world spent $1.8 trillion on its military in 2018, the latest report by the acclaimed Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). The US and its NATO allies – the self-proclaimed defenders of freedom and democracy – account for more than half of this whopping amount.

Washington’s other close friend Saudi Arabia is the third largest military spender, coming ahead of India.
READ MORE
Global military expenditure at 3-decade high, biggest spender US sees first increase since 2010

“A lot of this spending, particularly in the case of Saudi Arabia and India, is for political reasons,” Michael Maloof, a former senior security policy analyst at the Pentagon, told RT. New Delhi and Riyadh seek to “curry favor” with Washington by purchasing the US weapons in hope for concessions in other areas, he explained.

Washington’s NATO allies have seen pressure from the US related to their military spending ever since Donald Trump came to power in the White House. Maloof believes it has less to do with security of the alliance and more with the interests of the US arms manufacturers.

“A lot of that is aimed at trying to help the US defense industry to stay ahead [of their competitors] and hire more people,” he explained, adding that the issue of the military expenditures has a “clear economic dimension.”

In its desire to sate the always-hungry domestic military industrial complex, the US risks escalating tensions on the international arena, analysts warn. Washington’s hawks typically justify the need for ever-increasing military expenditures with some perceived threats from Russia or China, portraying them as war mongers.

“There is no good reason” for larger defense budgets, Ted Seay, a former US diplomat and senior policy consultant with the British American Security Information Council (BASIC), told RT. It is the West’s fear of the perceived ‘Russian threat’ that has in fact led to destabilization on the European continent, he noted.

ALSO ON RT.COM  US ‘not interested in matching new Russian weapons’, but will use nukes if it 'has to'

“There are military provocations taking place between NATO and Russia where there should not be any far in the 21th century when there is no logical reason for any confrontation between Europe and Russia,” Seay said.

The former US diplomat also denounced as senseless the NATO “formula” demanding that member states spend two percent of their GDP on defense.


There is not a military situation that necessitates [the likes of] Latvia or Poland to find a solution in greater military spending. It simply does not exist in this age. But there are people who seem to be intent on creating confrontation and encouraging the NATO countries to spend more money with no good reason.


Yet, it is precisely Poland and the Baltic States that top the list of nations with the highest annual defense spending increases in Europe over the recent years.

Poland’s military budget rose by 8.9 per cent in 2018 to $11.6 billion, according to SIPRI, while Latvia upped its military expenditures by staggering 24 percent over the same period. Bulgaria and Ukraine – which is not in NATO – followed closely, increasing their spending by 23 and 21 percent respectively.

Meanwhile, the US and its allies grossly outspend all the nations they perceive as alleged threats. The US expenditures alone accounted for 36 percent of global defense spending while exceeding the expenditures of the next eight largest-spending countries combined in 2018. NATO’s total military spending accounted for 53 percent of the global defense expenditures.ALSO ON RT.COM

Lukashenko says US behind Belarus protests, exploiting small newly emerged class of ‘young bourgeois’ who ‘want power’

HE TELLS RUSSIAN MEDIA

The Belarusian president believes that protests which have rocked the country are organized by Washington using Russian-designed messaging app Telegram and backboned by a class of “young bourgeois” that has emerged in Belarus.

Alexander Lukashenko, who has been under pressure since a disputed election last month, told Russian journalists on Tuesday that the alleged US interference is effectively a dry-run for a future attempt to destabilize Russia. The president officially won 80 percent of the vote in the August poll, but the opposition says the contest was rigged.

“We asked [Lukashenko] who is interested in this [supporting the protest movement in Belarus], and what side he expected and expects the trouble to come from,” Rossiya-1 TV reporter Yevgeny Rozkov revealed to news agency TASS. “He believes that, first and foremost, the Americans are behind everything, acting through centers in Poland and the Czech Republic. But there are also internal reasons, he said. One reason is the fact that two new generations have grown up in Belarus, forming a small class of ‘young bourgeois’ who ‘want power.’”

Dwelling on the alleged US ‘orchestrators’ of the unrest, Alexander Lukashenko stated that they have Russia in mind. “We know who is behind all those Telegram channels: they are the Americans. We all need to understand that this is not about Belarus. Their main goal is Russia,” Editor-in-Chief of Govorit Moskva radio station Roman Babayan quoted Lukashenko as saying. Babayan was among the Russian reporters who interviewed Lukashenko earlier on Tuesday.

Telegram is a cloud-based instant messaging app, devised by brothers Pavel and Nikolai Durov who previously created Russia's leading social network, VKontakte.  It does not disclose where its offices are located, but it's believed to have employees in St. Petersburg and Dubai.

“What do you do about Telegram channels? Can you block these Telegram channels? No one can, even those who invented this entire internet. The Americans,” Lukashenko added in extracts published by RT's Russian-language service. The full interview will be broadcast later.


The presidential election in Belarus took place on August 9. Immediately after the results were announced, mass protests sparked across the country leading to clashes with law enforcement during the first days. The Belarusian opposition’s Coordination Council urges people to continue protesting, while the authorities demand that the unauthorized rallies stop. According to the Belarusian leading opposition figure Pavel Latushko, over 10,000 people have been detained since August 9.“You can see what is going on there,” he went on to say referring to recent unrest in the United States. “And Telegram channels are playing a leading role there. And it was they who started the whole story, and did it long ago. Not Russia, not Belarus – it is they who have been doing it all the time. And now they have what they have. Whatever! And we are reaping the fruits of it.”