Tuesday, April 20, 2021

UK

Unions have asked the PM to reject the race commission’s report. Here’s why


Dr Patrick Roach
18th April, 2021

No matter your race, ethnicity or background, we all deserve fair treatment for the effort we put in. And we all deserve fair pay, a chance to progress, and dignity at work. Last year, in the wake of the Black Lives Matter protests, the Prime Minister made a commitment “to tackle the substance of the problems” and set up the commission on racial and ethnic disparities.

We hoped the commission would recommend action to achieve equality in UK workplaces and wider society. But instead, the commission’s report denies the lived realities and experiences of Black and minority ethnic people, creating the impression that it is BME workers’ perceptions and choices that are the problem.

It attempts to turn the clock back, to the time before the Macpherson Inquiry into the death of Stephen Lawrence – a time when racism was wrongly portrayed as ‘a few bad apples’, rather than the consequence of structural and systemic institutional failings.

The commission got it wrong. Racism is not anecdotal, as the chair Tony Sewell suggested. It is real and systemic in a country where, whatever the progress of recent decades, the system remains stacked against people by race, class and gender.

We need answers from the Prime Minister. Do the denials of institutional and structural racism of the report reflect the government’s direction of travel on race equality? Did the manner of the report’s publication intend to cause division, rather than calm? And what role did the government play in determining the report’s conclusions and recommendations?

Unions are clear: the report reinforced institutional racism by denying the facts of everyday racism. And that denial, if left unchallenged, could have a chilling effect on efforts to achieve workplace equality for BME workers in both the public and private sector. That’s why more than 30 trade union general secretaries have written to the Prime Minister repudiating the report.

Institutional and structural racism are real. They scar our country, hold back our economy, and undermine BME workers’ life chances. The Black and minority ethnic unemployment rate is almost double that of white workers. Black people are twice as likely to be trapped by poverty. Black workers are more likely to be in lower paid, insecure jobs or on zero-hours contracts. Black job-seekers are more likely to be refused a job, and one study found they must make 60% more job applications before being invited to interview.

Black workers in London, the region with the highest BME population, experience a 24% ethnicity pay gap. And Black workers are less likely to have received financial support during the pandemic, with young people from BME backgrounds more likely to be unemployed than white workers at every qualification level.

Racial discrimination occurs regardless of place and class, as shown by the fact that so many BME people live and work in the UK’s wealthiest city, yet fail to reap the rewards. And BME graduates from top universities find it harder to progress in their career than other workers.

Structural racism has played out during the pandemic, with BME people being three times more likely to die from coronavirus. This is not mere coincidence but reveals deeper structural issues to do with where people live, how much they earn and the jobs they do.

Unions propose an alternative approach to workplace equality – one that unites the interests of Black and minority ethnic workers with the interests of all workers. Today’s working class is multi-ethnic and multi-faith. Alongside specific action on racism, action to defend working class interests will reduce inequalities of class and race together.

In 2017, the government commissioned a report on race in the workplace from Ruby McGregor-Smith. She was clear that structural racism and unconscious bias are real obstacles to Black and minority ethnic working people. She recommended action on unconscious bias and recruitment and progression. The recommendations do not go far enough, but implementing them would be a start.

Unions believe ministers should go further and require employers to disclose and act to close ethnicity pay gaps. And every employer must be made responsible for protecting their workers from racist abuse by customers or clients.

Real equality at work, though, will come when everyone has a decent, secure job, with fair pay and in a safe workplace. That is why any race equality initiative must include action on the epidemic of insecure work that disproportionately traps BME workers in low-paid, casualised, risky occupations.

No working person should be paid less than a real living wage. No working person should have their life chances limited by the everyday precarity of insecure jobs. Business models based on denying workers’ rights are undercutting decent employers and making profits from exploitation.

The Conservatives promised an employment bill to improve rights and fairness at work following the 2019 election. But it has been delayed again and again. If the government is serious about race equality for working Britain, it will announce an employment bill in the Queen’s speech in May, with a clear mandate to stamp out insecure work.

Action to defending working class interests can reduce inequalities of class and race together. Unions reject attempts to divide working people, and set their interests against one another. We will not stop campaigning, organising and bargaining for decent work, fair wages, safety and an end to racism and discrimination – for BME workers and for everyone. We stand for all working people.


Dr Patrick Roach is general secretary of the NASUWT, the teachers' union. He is currently chair of the TUC anti-racism task force.@PatrickR_NASUWT

UK
York "must confront uncomfortable truths" after review into Rowntree Company sparked by Black Lives Matter protests exposes slavery links and racial injustices

York must confront “uncomfortable truths” about its past, according to a city councillor, after a review into the history of the confectioners the Rowntree Company exposed historic racial injustices that pose questions about the legacy of social reformer Joseph Rowntree.


By Victoria Finan
Saturday, 17th April 2021

Four charities and trusts that still bear the name of Joseph Rowntree (pictured), who set up the company, united earlier this week to express they were “appalled” at the review’s findings, and have committed to further research as well as apologising on behalf of their predecessors.


The review, which was commissioned in the wake of last year’s Black Lives Matter protests, has shown the Rowntree Company may have benefitted from cocoa products made by enslaved people, and also from a form of slavery known as colonial indenture in the late 19th and early 20th century.

This saw thousands of people from India and Southeast Asia recruited to work on plantations in Caribbean and West Africa where they worked unpaid until they had “worked off” the cost of their transportation.

Four charities and trusts that still bear the name of Joseph Rowntree, who set up the company, united earlier this week to express they were “appalled” at the review’s findings, and have committed to further research as well as apologising on behalf of their predecessors.

They have also acknowledged that some parts of the injustices were known within the organisations and that not enough attention has been paid to this element of the Rowntree story

The review, by the Rowntree Society, said: “Although what is known has not been actively ‘hidden’, it has not formed part of the public presentation of Rowntree history.”

There is no suggestion that Joseph Rowntree himself was aware or complicit in the historic practises, but, the review states that “it is clear that we need to confront uncomfortable questions about the Rowntree family and company’s participation in colonialism and racialised exploitative working practices.

Catherine Oakley, Executive Director of the Rowntree Society said: "Some parts of these wide-ranging histories have already been covered in academic research, others less so. On one level, it has been known that the Rowntree company operated during the period of colonial era trade, but the details of the company's global operations in Africa and the Caribbean haven't been a part of the established Rowntree story. We've started a process of mapping these colonial contexts across a long historical period ranging from the 1820s to the 1980s, bringing existing sources together, and putting them into new focus."

The review further found in the 1980s, the company’s South African subsidiary abused its black workforce, “including summary dismissal and forced unemployment to suppress unrest” during the period of apartheid.


Coun Darryl Smalley, City of York Council’s executive member for culture, leisure & communities, said: “The Black Lives Matter movement, which has inspired research such as this to take place, has helped to shine a light on the uncomfortable truths and history which as a city we must confront.

“Just as we have a moral obligation to speak out against the injustice we’re witnessing across the world, we also can’t ignore the fact that racism, unfortunately, is not only a part of our history but is still present in our society.”

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, one of the largest anti-poverty charities in the UK, is offering specialist support to staff from black and other minority ethnic communities in the wake of the review.

A spokesperson for Quakers in Britain said: “Building a true picture of the history and legacies of racial exploitation in Quaker companies is an important part of owning and understanding our own history, and is informing our ongoing work to become an anti-racist church.”

Pressure group CharitySoWhite which campaigns for better representation across the third sector for black and other minority ethnic communities, tweeted: "This is the sort of soul searching and radical honesty that we need to see from every charity, every funder, every philanthropist."


4th request to federal government to join coal mine environmental review in Alberta

A fourth request has been made to the federal government to get involved in the environmental review of a coal mine proposed for Alberta's Rocky Mountains.
© Provided by The Canadian Press

Landowners, Indigenous people and environmental groups have sent a letter to Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson asking for a joint federal-provincial review of Montem Resource's Tent Mountain project.

"It's important for the minister to understand that the concern is quite widespread," said Bobbi Lambright of the Livingstone Landowners Group, one of the signatories to the letter.

The others are the environmental law firm Ecojustice, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and Niitsitapi Water Protectors. Their request for federal participation joins others from the Siksika and Blood First Nations, rancher Macleay Blades and an 18,000-name petition presented by Edmonton NDP MP Heather McPherson.

The petition goes further in requesting a general review of all potential coal projects in the area.

Ecojustice lawyer David Khan said one reason the mine needs federal review is that it would span the Alberta-British Columbia boundary.

"Some of the leases themselves are in B.C.," he said.

The letter spells out a long list of other reasons why the signatories believe Ottawa should be involved.

It says the mine would be in an environmentally sensitive region, would affect areas of federal authority such as fisheries and species at risk, and could pollute water flowing into the United States.

The letter adds the mine could make Canada's greenhouse gas targets harder to reach and would be one of similar developments that would have significant cumulative impacts.

It would also affect Indigenous rights, something Alberta's regulatory agency is forbidden by law from considering.

Khan noted that Montem's coal output, at least at first, would be just shy of a threshold triggering an automatic federal review.

"We certainly are concerned whether they've been manipulating volumes to get out of a federal assessment," he said.

Company materials say Canada's Impact Assessment Agency has already told Montem it won't get involved in a review. Communication to that effect does not appear on the agency's public registry.

Lambright said Ottawa conducts better reviews.

"One of the concerns with the Alberta Energy Regulator process is that it's not transparent. It's very difficult to find out what's going on and there's very limited opportunity for meaningful public input."

She said the joint federal-provincial review of the proposed Grassy Mountain mine offered much better access to information and opportunity for discussion.

The requests for federal involvement now go to the Impact Assessment Agency. The minister has 90 days to respond and can overrule the agency's initial decision. The first request was made on March 2.

A spokeswoman for Wilkinson said he couldn't comment until after the requests are processed.

"Lots of times these decisions end up in court or are judicially reviewed," said Moira Kelly.

Alberta's coal controversy began last May when the United Conservative government quietly revoked a policy that had protected the summits and eastern slopes of the Rockies from open-pit coal mines since 1976.

Concerns grew, both over the threat to a beloved landscape and the potential for water contamination from selenium, common in coal mining.

Facing a huge public backlash, the government restored the policy and its protections in February. However, it failed to cancel exploration leases sold in the interim and several companies have been drilling and road-building in an area where much of Alberta's drinking water originates.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 6, 2021.

— Follow @row1960 on Twitter

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. An earlier version said the latest request was the third to be made of the federal government.

TWEEDLE DEE & TEEDLE DUM
Environmentalists dismayed by Ecuador presidential candidates

AFP 2021-04-07

Environmental activists will feel stuck between a rock and hard place when forced to choose a new president
.
© Rodrigo BUENDIA Ecuadorans must choose between Andres Arauz (left) and Guillermo Lasso to be their next president, but environmentalists are not impressed LASSO WON


THE LEFT AND RIGHT WING OF CAPITALISM

Leftist Andres Arauz faces the right-wing Guillermo Lasso in a run-off election with both vowing to continue oil and mineral extraction, which has already devastated a sixth of Ecuador's Amazon jungle.

"Ecuador remains immersed in an extractivist policy. That is to say that both candidates believe Ecuador's future is in oil and that has nothing to do with reality," Carlos Larrea, the director of the socio-environmental unit at the Simon Bolivar University, told AFP.
© Rodrigo BUENDIA Should he be elected, former banker Guillermo Lasso (C) has pledged to reduce the use of fossil fuels, "stop" deforestation and launch projects to generate electricity using renewable sources

"Extractivist" policy refers to plans for extracting natural resources for export.

It's left the Environment Front -- a collective of 60 ecological and human rights organizations -- feeling glum about the future government of one of the most biodiverse countries in the world.

Having evaluated their election manifestos ahead of the February 7 first round, the Environment Front gave Arauz a "worrying" score of 63.6 out of 100, while Lasso was deemed "toxic" to the natural habitat with just 36.5.

© CAMILA BUENDIA Andres Arauz, who plans to switch to clean energy instead of fossil fuels for generating electricity and for the public transport system, speaks during a campaign rally with rappers in Quito on April 1, 2021

"We're starting off with candidates that are not green, which is why we're demanding compromises from them," Natalia Greene, the vice-president of the CEDENMA group of organizations defending nature, told AFP.

It could have been different, though, had Lasso not defeated socialist indigenous campaigner Yaku Perez to make it into the runoff round of voting.

Perez, a long-time campaigner against mining and for the defense of water, scored 93.4 in the Environment Front evaluation.

He's a member of Pachakutik, the political arm of Ecuador's largest indigenous movement battling the mass exploitation of natural resources in their lands.

Ecuador officially recognizes the rights of "Pacha Mama" -- an indigenous deity that means "Mother Earth" in the Quechua language -- such as her existence and the maintenance and regeneration of her cycles of life.
Mexican election candidate launches campaign from coffin
AFP 2021-04-07

A Mexican congressional candidate launched his election campaign in a coffin Tuesday to highlight the country's many thousands of deaths from the coronavirus pandemic and cartel-related violence.

© HERIKA MARTINEZ Mexican congressional candidate Carlos Mayorga launches his campaign from inside a coffin to send a message to politicians that people are dying 'because of their indifference'

Carlos Mayorga, a lower house candidate for the Encuentro Solidario party in the northern state of Chihuahua, said he was sending a message to politicians that people were dying "because of their indifference."
© HERIKA MARTINEZ Mexican congressional candidate Carlos Mayorga arrived in a casket for a campaign rally on a bridge between the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and El Paso, Texas

Mayorga arrived inside a gold-colored casket at a campaign rally on a bridge between the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and El Paso, Texas.

He was accompanied by aides dressed in personal protective equipment and carrying bouquets of flowers to draw attention to Mexico's Covid-19 death toll of more than 200,000 -- one of the world's highest.

Politicians "have remained silent about the high levels of organized crime. They have remained silent about the chaotic Covid situation," Mayorga said.

More than 300,000 people have been murdered in Mexico since the government deployed the military in the war on drugs in 2006, according to official figures.

The campaign for June midterm elections has brought a wave of political violence which has seen 16 candidates murdered.

str/yug/dr/bfm



NRA exec sheltered on borrowed yacht after mass shootings


After school shootings that left dozens dead in recent years, National Rifle Association leader Wayne LaPierre said the resulting outrage put him in such danger that he sought shelter aboard a borrowed 108-foot (32.92-meter) yacht.


© Provided by The Canadian Press

During a deposition, the head of the powerful gun-rights group’s acknowledged sailing in The Bahamas with his family as a “security retreat” in the summers following a 2012 school shootings in Connecticut and a 2018 massacre in Florida.

“I was basically under presidential threat without presidential security in terms of the number of threats I was getting,” LaPierre said, according to a transcript of the deposition filed in court over the weekend. “And this was the one place that I hope could feel safe, where I remember getting there going, ‘Thank God I’m safe, nobody can get me here.’”

The testimony emerged in a federal bankruptcy trail over whether the NRA should be allowed to incorporate in Texas instead of New York, where a state lawsuit is trying to put it out of business. LaPierre is scheduled to take the witness stand in the case, which is being conducted virtually before a court in Dallas, this week.

The NRA declared bankruptcy in January, months after New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued seeking the group’s dissolution over claims that top executives illegally diverted tens of millions of dollars for lavish personal trips, no-show contracts for associates and other questionable expenditures.

The allegations include that LaPierre repeatedly sailed in The Bahamas on the yacht of Hollywood producer Stanton McKenzie, whose company has done business with the NRA, but did not mention the trips on financial disclosures. McKenzie is not named in the suit but both it and LaPierre's deposition include the name of his yacht: Illusions.

In the deposition, LaPierre said he did not pay to use McKenzie's yacht, which came with a cook, a motor boat and a pair of Sea-Doo personal watercraft. He said he did not think using the vessel violated the NRA's conflict-of-interest policy because the summer sailing trips were for security. Nonetheless, LaPierre said he stopped using it in 2019 as part of the NRA's “self-correction.”

The shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut left 20 first graders and six educators dead in December 2012. The February 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida killed 17 people.

The NRA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on LaPierre’s testimony.

McKenzie did not immediately respond to voicemail and email messages to his company seeking comment. He told The Wall Street Journal, which first reported LaPierre 's use of his yacht last year, that he hadn’t read New York's lawsuit and couldn’t discuss any litigation.

Shannon Watts, the founder of the gun control group Moms Demand Action, highlighted LaPierre’s testimony on Twitter Monday, mocking his argument that it takes “a good guy with a gun” to stop a mass shooting. “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good friend with a yacht?“ she wrote.

The group's bankruptcy trial began Monday with a lawyer for New York arguing that LaPierre put the NRA into Chapter 11 bankruptcy despite its financial strength to escape accountability for his own spending abuses. He made the move largely by himself and kept the plan secret from the group’s board, its general counsel and treasurer at the time, New York Assistant Attorney General Monica Connell told Judge Harlin Hale.

Though headquartered in Virginia, the NRA was chartered as a non-profit in New York in 1871 and is incorporated in the state. Its bankruptcy filing listed between $100 million and $500 million in assets and placed its liabilities in the same range.

NRA lawyer Greg Garman said during opening statements that LaPierre did nothing wrong and made the decision to put the group into bankruptcy to avoid New York authorities having it placed in a receivership. The NRA has cast a court appointing a receiver to oversee the organization as a potential death blow and argued that it's looking for a more politically favourable environment in gun-friendly Texas.

“I think it will help us flourish to get out of that environment and get into a state that really wants us here,” NRA First Vice-President Charles Cotton testified Tuesday.

Jake Bleiberg, The Associated Press 
2021-04-07
Egypt's First Woman Ship Captain Marwa Elselehdar Blamed For Suez Canal Blockage Despite Not Being On Boat



Elizabeth Blackstock
4/04/21 

The saga of the Ever Given was a beautiful one while it lasted—is there anything funnier than a large boat getting stuck in the narrow Suez Canal?—but it’s had lasting supply chain effects that are pretty miserable. And that’s not even as bad as the flack that one woman—Marwa Elselehdar—is getting for a role she didn’t even play in the event.

Elselehdar, 29, is Egypt’s first-ever female ship captain, and when the Ever Given blocked the Suez Canal, she realized that people were placing her at the center of the fiasco. People were using social media to share a doctored screenshot of an Arab Times headline that claimed she was at the helm of the ship at the time it was stuck. It appeared that the headline had been altered from a March 22 profile of Elselehdar praising her successes. You can see the doctored headline here.

The news came as a shock to Elselehdar, who was working as a first mate on the Aida IV vessel near Alexandria, which is hundreds of miles away.

And that wasn’t all. People began making Twitter accounts with her name claiming responsibility and furthers spreading the false rumors.

READ MORE
'Ever Given' Suez Canal Blunder Is Causing A Garden Gnome Shortage

Egypt To 'Ever Given' Owners: Pay Us $1 Billion Or You Aren't Getting Your Big Boat Back (UPDATE)

“I felt that I might be targeted maybe because I’m a successful female in this field or because I’m Egyptian, but I’m not sure,” she told the BBC this weekend.

As you can imagine, piloting a ship isn’t exactly a realm rife with equality. The International Maritime Organization notes that only two percent of the world’s seafarers are women—and 94 percent of those women work in the cruise industry.

So, it makes sense, unfortunately, that Elselehdar has received backlash for her very presence. She was the first woman to enroll in Egypt’s naval academy and captained the Aida IV when it was the very first vessel to traverse the newly-expanded Suez Canal in 2015.

She told the BBC the following:

Onboard, they were all older men with different mentalities, so it was difficult not to be able to find like-minded people to communicate with. It was challenging to go through this alone and be able to overcome it without affecting my mental health.

“People in our society still don’t accept the idea of girls working in the sea away from their families for a long time. But when you do what you love, it is not necessary for you to seek the approval of everyone.

And in a video she shared on social media, Elselehdar had many other strong words:

Frankly, when I read the news, I was upset, because I worked really hard to reach the position I have reached, and anyone who works in this field knows how much effort a person has made over the years to reach this rank.

One has to spend many years at sea, studying and taking exams before reaching this level.

I graduated in 2013 and got an MBA, then I was promoted from second officer to first officer, and now I am a captain.

So, it is difficult to see that someone is trying to cancel all this effort and credit it to himself, or accuse me of being a failure or that I neglect my work.

Believe me that I am not trying to promote myself, but it is not nice for someone to speak in your name in a way that has nothing to do with your personality, your upbringing, your career or anything else.

It’s my reputation, and I definitely don’t want it damaged like this.

So, for the record, Elselehdar was not behind the wheel of the Ever Given when it blocked the Suez Canal.

Elizabeth Blackstock
Weekends at Jalopnik. Managing editor at A Girl's Guide to Cars. Lead IndyCar writer and assistant editor at Frontstretch. Novelist. Motorsport fanatic.
Meeting held for potential investors in Redvers wheat straw plant

A public investor meeting was held in Redvers last week for the Re-Gain Corporation, a corporation under Parko Ventures Corp. The Re-Gain Corporation is hoping to establish a wheat-straw pulp mill in the Redvers area.

During the presentations that spanned over two days, Re-Gain extended the opportunity for local investors to invest in the project before making plans to open investment opportunities in other avenues, saying they would prefer to keep investments local.

Local investors will receive special incentives to invest in the project including reimbursement of the money invested after a set number of years and $1.00 shares.

Currently there is no set number for how much investment Re-Gain is looking for, but during last week’s presentations it was said that Re-Gain is looking for as much investment as possible.

Redvers was selected because of its location and concentration of grain farms in the area. Redvers resident and local farmer Martin Hjertaas helped bring attention to Redvers after expressing interest in Re-Gain, noting its ideal location.

Because of the surrounding farmland, there is no short supply of wheat-straw that is used in production for the mill.

The wheat mill, which is estimated to cost around $23.7 million, would process wheat straw into pulp that could be used for bio-degradable dinnerware and single-use cutlery.

Wheat straw would be bought by Re-Gain at market value from local producers and turned into a pulp which is used to produce the biodegradable products. Producers would then be able to collect the waste that is produced by the process and use it to return nutrients to the soil.

Founder of Re-Gain, Nitin Chirdeep, says their goal for the meeting was to answer the questions and concerns of local investors and producers.

“We just wanted to give a brief overview of our company, what we stand for, and basically what are willing to do to set up a factory in Redvers. This is a completely clean tech biotech agri-waste product manufacturing company with biodegradable products,” said Chirdeep.

“We were looking to raise support from all the ag producers as well as looking for any potential investors who support us in our vision.”

Chirdeep says that they had a good turnout for their meeting.

“We ran six sessions in total, lasting two days. With COVID restrictions being monitored, we had a great turnout and we saw a lot of support from the people attending as well.”

Chirdeep explained that the pulp mill will also be able to produce biodegradable products, noting that they could supply a green alternative to single-use plastics.

During a meeting on Monday, Chirdeep explained that they would ideally be able to supply surrounding communities with single-use products which could be used as take-out boxes or single-use dishes and cutlery for events.

“Our first goal is to make the wheat-straw pulp mill. We have a niche technology that is being researched and developed by our company to produce wheat-straw pulp in an efficient and green way. Our first source of product is the pulp, subsequent processing will be done for tableware and cutlery which would enable us to lower the use of single-use plastics.”

Chirdeep notes the products made through the pulp mill would be made available for purchase in Redvers and surrounding communities.

Chirdeep says that the companies are on track to begin construction this year, however, Re-Gain is still looking for investors to contribute to the project. Operating through funding with Parko Ventures, Chirdeep says they will be able to begin construction, but will require investment as they progress.

“We are pretty much in line, we have made all the necessary connections, we’re been in touch with RM of Antler and we have found the area that we would be constructing it on. Also, we’ve been receiving a great amount of support from the Redvers Town Council and we hope to kickstart our work by the middle of this year.

“We are expecting a turnaround time of 12 and 15 months from the end of construction to the start of production. We are anticipating to complete construction by July 2022 and we hope to open our doors between 12 and 15 months after,” said Chirdeep.

He says that the plant will operate with 20 employees per shift for three shifts with a total of 60 employees being hired for the processing plant.

Chirdeep says that ideally, Re-Gain will hire as many as they can from Redvers and the surrounding area.

“With the number of jobs we will be putting on the table, we would be employing most of our workforce out of Redvers locally and training them. Apart from that, we would also be working with all the ag producers and farmers in developing and bringing in the latest trends and technologies available through our other entities of Parko Ventures and making it available.”

Chirdeep notes that if the first mill is successful, Re-Gain intends to construct a total of 8 wheat-straw pulp mills across the prairie provinces all under the Re-Gain Corporation, starting with Redvers, then Morden before constructing one in Alberta as well.

Spencer Kemp, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The World-Spectator
2021-04-06

https://redvers.ca

Redvers is located in southeast Saskatchewan at highway junctions 8 and 13 and has a vibrant population of 1042. The Moose Mountain Provincial Park is 60 km northwest with the Manitoba border being 19 km east and the USA border is 50 km south.


Residents of Montreal apartment building fight ‘renoviction,’ take protest to their balconies
Dan Spector
GLOBAL NEWS
 2021-04-06



There are more and more stories of Montrealers being forced out of their homes so landlords can renovate and charge new tenants more.
© Dan Spector / Global News Residents of an apartment building in the Plateau are in a fight with ownership. April 6, 2021.

Many renters accept their fate and plunge into the volatile Montreal rental market. People living in one 90-unit building in the Plateau, however, are not backing down. The building's balconies are decorated with large blue signs denouncing ownership and a "renoviction."

VIDEO
Tenants of Montreal highrise fighting forced move


"The first night I didn't sleep at all, but after that, I said to myself: 'I'm going to fight,"' 68-year-old Renee Thifault told Global News of finding out her landlord was asking to leave her Plateau apartment after 14 years.

Thifault very much enjoys living at Manoir Lafontaine, a high-rise apartment building on Papineau Avenue right across from Lafontaine Park.

She pays less than $700 per month for her two-and-a-half apartment, a price that's nearly impossible to find in the Plateau these days. The owner of the building now wants her and everyone else living there to leave.

Tenants were all given a notice on March 31, saying major renovations are needed in the building, constructed in the 1960s. All 90 units must be vacated for at least seven months by June 30.

"It was kind of the worst moment for us to receive this notice, due to the obvious conditions of the market and the pandemic," said Michel Trujillo, who lives in an apartment with his partner Daily Hernandez and their two children.

The building is owned by Hillpark Capital. Founding partner Brandon Shiller told Global News that when his company acquired the buildings two years ago, it was in an advanced state of disrepair.

"We are now obligated to temporarily relocate our tenants to ensure their safety and well-being during this necessary intensive construction period," he said.

Residents aren't buying it.

"It's not true that it's for our protection," said Thifault.

"Their main goal has always been to empty the building," said Hernandez.

Residents wonder who would come back after having been forced to leave for seven months or more.

To compensate each resident for costs they'll incur for moving and renting another home in the meantime, Hillpark is offering to pay each resident $1,959.

"It's not even going to cover two months of rent," said Hernandez.

Tenants believe they're being "renovicted." They think the owners will renovate the building and put the units back on the market for a much higher price. They've decided not to back down.

"We're fighting this together," said Joe Wasserman.










The residents all met Monday evening and are refusing the owner's demand. They've mobilized on a Facebook group and are courting politicians for support. They say they'll bring Hillpark Capital to the Quebec Housing Tribunal if necessary.

"Is it necessary to evacuate everyone from the building for the entire seven months?" wonders housing rights advocate Cloé Fortin of the Comité Logement du Plateau Mont-Royal.

She said before the tribunal, the owners would have to present a valid reason that nobody could be there during the renovations. Residents say they have no problem staying while necessary repairs are done.

Fortin said Hillpark has "renovicted" other buildings in the area and that they would also need to compensate people adequately for their time outside their homes.

Dupuis said standing up to the building's owners will discourage others from doing the same thing.

The notice residents received at Manoir Lafontaine also refers to asbestos, but residents don't buy that either.

"On the asbestos, what I would like is for the City of Montreal to come here and to check each apartment to make sure it's actually present," said Wasserman.

Laurence Houde-Roy, a spokesperson for the Plante administration, told Global News will be sending an inspector this week to evaluate the state of the building.



Another prominent Google scientist is leaving the company amid fallout from fired AI researcher

Jennifer Elias
CNBC 2021-04-06


One of the managers of Google Brain, Samy Bengio, announced Tuesday he's leaving the company.
It's the highest-ranking team member to leave the company amid the fallout of well-known artificial intelligence researcher's departure from Google.

Google Brain is an AI research team at Google.

© Provided by CNBC The Google logo outside if its New York City offices, which were closed on May 19, 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Samy Bengio, a well-known researcher at Google's research group Brain, announced on Tuesday he's resigning from Google.

Bengio is the highest-ranked official to depart amid the fallout from Google's handling of ethics researcher Timnit Gebru, a well-known artificial intelligence researcher at Google who said the company abruptly fired her last fall after she requested clarity about a retracted paper.

"This is one of the most difficult emails I can think of sending to all of you: I have decided to leave Google in order to pursue other exciting opportunities," Bengio wrote in an email to his Google research team obtained by CNBC. "There's no doubt that leaving this wonderful team is really difficult." His last day is April 28.

Bengio oversaw Gebru's team and said in December that he wasn't notified the company had fired Gebru. He started at Google in 2007, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Bloomberg first reported Bengio's resignation.

"I stand by you, Timnit," he wrote in a Facebook post in December. "I also stand by the rest of my team who, like me, was stunned and is trying to make sense of all this. In particular the Ethical AI team, but also the broader Brain Research team."

Gebru was the technical co-lead of the Ethical AI Team at Google and worked on algorithmic bias and data mining. She's a well-known advocate for diversity in technology and is the co-founder of a community of black researchers called Black in AI.

CEO Sundar Pichai vowed to investigate after industry-wide outrage at Gebru's firing. In February, the company said it concluded the investigation and made tweaks to diversity and research policies. It declined to share investigation findings.

But that didn't stop the fallout. The company fired Margaret Mitchell, Gebru's co-lead, in February, alleging she transferred electronic files out of the company. Academics turned down funding from Google. At least a few employees have resigned, citing the company's handling of Gebru's research and departure.

Though Bengio didn't mention Gebru specifically in his departure email Tuesday, he gave kudos to his team for improving their "understanding of machine learning and its impact on the world."

"I've learned so much with all of you, in terms of machine learning research of course, but also on how difficult yet important it is to organize a large team of researchers as to promote long term ambitious research, exploration, rigor and diversity and inclusion."

Neither Google nor Samy Bengio immediately responded to requests for comment.