Monday, September 20, 2021

BLACK & WHITE HATS 

'The regime is bleeding brains': Meet the hackers trying to bring down Belarus' disputed president

By Hannah Somerville • Updated: 14/09/2021

A gathering in Minsk on November 12, 2020 to honour a protester killed during the demonstrations last year. - Copyright AP Photo

The crackdown on dissent in Belarus has been ruthless, methodical and, at times, relentless. Most of Europe had been largely oblivious until the diversion of a Ryanair flight to Minsk and the arrest of a dissident journalist caught people's imagination in May.

But while the authorities may have tried to crush public opposition to long-time president Alexander Lukashenko, they may have only succeeded in driving dissent underground.

Last week, a group of anonymous so-called “ethical hackers” published the latest recording from a massive cache of information seized from the computers of the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs.

In what, if verified, would be one of the most successful hacks of its kind in history, the Belarusian Cyber-Partisans (CP) said in July it had broken into the Ministry’s computers, obtaining more than five terabytes of data.

The group told Euronews that, so far, it had not even published 0.01 per cent of the stolen data. In time, CP says it plans to leak the details of every single operative helping President Alexander Lukashenko crush dissent in the country.

This is the group’s story so far.

The deputy police chief’s premonition

The recorded phone call CP released last Tuesday (September 7) is dated August 17, 2020: about two weeks after nationwide protests erupted over the disputed re-election of Lukashenko, who has ruled Belarus since 1994.

It is understood to have taken place between Podvoisky Igor, deputy police chief for Minsk city, and Kozlov Vitaly, first deputy police chief of Minsk oblast. Given what CP now says it has achieved, it was prescient in more ways than one.

A taped conversation said to be between two Minsk police chiefs in August 2020 was published by CP last week
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

In it, Podvoisky describes his exhaustion after weeks of dealing with what he terms “all this sh*t”. Police, he says, lack a coherent plan of action, state media directors are rebelling, and technical staff are downing tools in droves to join the uprising.

Orders given to police at that time, according to him, were to try to defuse the situation rather than inflame the protests any further. “For now, don’t pressure anyone. Then time will tell… It’s over. There is no plan. Currently, we’re taking the position of protracting the conflict.”

That stance didn’t last. As of March this year more than 33,000 people had been arrested after the regime cracked down on the protests.

The struggle is not over for a democratic Belarus | View

Revolt, repression and reprisals: A look back at a year of turmoil in Belarus

But that day, on August 17, 2020, Lukashenko was apparently in a conciliatory mood. According to the man identified as Podvoisky, he’d waded straight into a crowd of protesters heading for the Ministry of Health and tried to speak in earnest with around 12 of them, one at a time, for about 90 minutes. “[They] didn’t let him insert a word,” the deputy police chief says.

In addition, tellingly, Podvoisky expressed alarm at how the protesters always seemed to know where police and security forces would show up next. When he and others decided internally to leave Minsk Automobile Plant (MAZ) checkpoint via the delivery entrance, they still showed up in their thousands: “In five minutes 2,500 pop up at the gate, with posters.”

Thousands-strong crowds protest against Lukashenko's regime in Independence Square, Minsk, on August 23, 2020
AP Photo

“Vitalya,” the man goes on, “I have no f*cking idea how they [the protesters] organised it all. So many details. The preparations must have taken a month or two. It’s incredible, following everybody’s smallest f*cking movement…”

So paranoid was the Belarusian state at that time, it appears that even closed communications between police officers and government officials were being monitored and recorded.

Belarus: 100,000 take to the streets to protest against Lukashenko
Tens of thousands of protesters flood Belarus streets putting pressure on Lukashenko

And 12 months on from those turbulent days, the same issues Podvoisky agonised over on the phone – discontent within the ranks, an exodus of technical staff, and the Belarusian people’s incredible level of self-organisation – would play straight into the hands of groups like CP.

“We never expected to extract so much data undetected,” a representative of the group told Euronews. “But with the current regime, you never know.

“So many high-tech areas are neglected. IT professionals were forced to leave Belarus in the thousands. The regime is bleeding brains they can't make up for.”
Belarus’s digitised revolution

The brains, in this case, belong to a group of around 15 Belarusian citizens and activists, all IT specialists, who joined forces after the protests began last August.

They don’t know each other’s real names. Just three to four are actual hackers, and none are professionals – they learned on the go over the past 12 months.

CP is one member of a bigger consortium of cyberwarriors known as Suprativ, which was formed on September 18, 2020, and includes two other groups, partly made up of ex-regime operatives, called Flying Storks and The People’s Self-Defense Brigade.

The alliance does not recognise Lukashenko as the legitimate ruler of Belarus. Its manifesto lists three goals: “preservation of the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Belarus”, overthrowing the Lukashenko regime, and aiding the country in a stable return to “democratic principles of governance and rule of law”.


The picture CP says is Alexander Lukashenko's passport photo
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

In turn, Suprativ forms part of a vast ecosystem of Belarusian digital activism that fomented for years and was turbo-charged last summer. Protesters used firewall-circumventing software on their phones to get around an internet blackout imposed by Lukashenko on election day, then used social media to organise.

Telegram channels like the Warsaw-based Nexta, founded by 22-year-old dissident blogger Stsiapan Putsila, and Belarus of the Brain kept people informed during those turbulent days by sharing on-the-ground photos and videos of the carnage going on inside the country.

A crowdsourced map of strikes, belzabastovka.org, showed would-be demonstrators where to go, while the Telegram channel Okretsina Lists kept track of those detained.

A constellation of other Belarusian platforms also kept the momentum going. One start-up, PandaDoc, crowdfunded cash to help law enforcement officers pay the heavy fines required to quit their jobs. On September 2, authorities raided its Minsk offices and arrested five staff members.

Meanwhile, campaigns like BY_help and the Belarusian Sport Solidarity Foundation raised funds to support those injured, fined or otherwise targeted during the protests.

Nexta and Belarus of the Brain editor-in-chief Roman Protasevich was arrested after his flight to Lithuania was diverted to Minsk earlier this year
AP Photo

Online platform Voice is engaged in a digital re-count of the 2020 election vote and has so far independently verified more than 1.6 million votes in a bid to show the officially-stated outcome was false.

All these initiatives and scores more were entirely self-generated, without state support or financing. The CP activist told Euronews that their own Suprativ alliance was “one big family” – albeit one thrown together by the cruellest of circumstances.

“We were all shocked by what happened in August 2020,” they said. “Each of us individually decided to do something about it.

“We could never have imagined we would grow so much and manage to pull off so many little stabs at the regime (some are not so little). We could never have imagined we would be working hand-in-hand with real-life partisans and have a real shot.”
The MVD hack: Mapping Europe’s last dictatorship

In July and August this year, CP publicly claimed responsibility for a series of cyberattacks on Belarusian state databases and websites. The most important was, it appears, the servers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD).

The group claims it now has access to the passport details of every single Belarusian citizen, including the files with restricted access such as members of the security services and the Belarusian KGB.

The group has already released the details of regime officials, including the locations of their villas
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

“We think that the KGB is, for the most part, a repressive and terroristic organisation that contributes very little to the country's security,” the spokesperson said.

“We'll gradually leak all their operatives and plan to assist in building new intelligence agencies in a new Belarus that will actually protect its citizens.”

Hundreds of alleged agents’ names and photographs have already been published, as have those of 200 judges. Operatives’ housing assignments were also included in the data.

On June 25 CP published a map detailing the given addresses of 500 state employees, from the secretary of the Republican Youth Union to Investigative Committee members.

A map published by CP in September purports to show the Minsk addresses of 500 Belarusian officials
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

The map came together with a statement: “Don’t think that if you didn’t personally beat with a club and didn’t torture people in the gyms of the police department or the temporary detention centre, that you’re removed.

“Those who are now sitting in ironed shirts in cool offices may well be punished for criminal inaction.”

CP has pledged not to touch the data of the millions of ordinary Belarusians whose details were included in the treasure trove. That information is reportedly being kept in encrypted form on a server isolated from the net.

Previously in May, in retaliation for Belarus’s arrest of ex-Nexta chief editor Roman Protasevich after his passenger plane was diverted to Minsk, Suprativ hacked the internal network of the Presidential Academy of Public Administration.

The group deleted academy documents, databases and servers. “Now they will have to work for a long time in the old-fashioned way,” they wrote, “with calculators and pieces of paper.”

Some of the emergency call records CP says it obtained, including calls placed by Belarusian citizens informing on their neighbours
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

The group also obtained some 10 years’ worth of emergency calls, 16,000 secret internal files including several on Lukashenko and his family – it claimed last month to have published the president’s phone number – and hundreds of thousands of hours of wiretapped phone calls.

“The most revelatory data we obtained are the phone call recordings of the MVD’s internal telephone system,” the CP spokesperson said. “Apparently the regime was recording its own people.

“High-ranking officials felt safe discussing the illegal commands they issued during the crackdown on protests in 2020. The regime kept a lot of incriminating material on its own people intentionally, to be able to extort them in the future and make them commit even harsher crimes.

“We ‘crashed the party’ and ruined their plans. We think this will reduce the chance of violence from the police in the future.”

Other recorded phone calls so far published include a police officer laughing as he describes pulling a woman from her car by the hair and beating her with two SWAT team members, and the head of the ministry saying officials were instructed not to feed or give bed linen to the detainees.

CP was instructed by BYPOL, a group of ex-Belarusian police officers and other defectors, on how to infiltrate some of the computer systems. It says it has hacked the police database and accessed cameras at police stations and jails but has yet to release any footage.

Stills from CCTV footage CP said it had accessed from the Belarusian police database
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

One dismal revelation the group recently reported on Telegram was that COVID-19 deaths in Belarus are likely to have been drastically under-reported to the World Health Organization.

The country’s national statistics portal, Belstat, stopped publishing new mortality data in June 2020. But CP’s passport system hack included the personal data of 1.4 million Belarusians who had died from January 2010 to March 2021.

Independent analysis by the TV channel Current Time found that excess deaths – the number of recorded deaths more than what would be expected in a normal year – from March 2020 to March 2021 stood at 32,000. The country’s officially reported COVID-19 death toll in March was 2,247.

'We removed the masks'


The Belarusian regime has tacitly acknowledged the magnitude of the hack on several occasions in the last month and a half.

At a meeting of the Council of Ministers on August 17, according to the official tribune of the Presidential Administration, Lukashenko warned officials: “If you cannot, as I often say, protect information on your computers, then go back to paper media. Write by hand and put it in your box.”

The head of the KGB, Ivan Tertel, had previously issued a stark warning about foreign hackers during a meeting with local council heads on July 30. “With the use of modern information technologies [and] hacker attacks on personal data,” he said, “a systematic collection of information is carried out.”
Lukashenko's spokeswoman Natallia Mikalaeuna Eismant, left, is among those whose calls were apparently recorded by the regime
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

The day after Lukashenko’s comments, a court in Belarus then designated two Telegram accounts linked to CP and Suprativ as ‘extremist’, accusing them of "discrediting law enforcement officers and representatives of government bodies" and "inciting social enmity."

The CP spokesperson alleged the regime was “actively trying” to gather information on the group. “We are very aware of the regime's efforts to infiltrate our rows,” they said. “We have already developed a methodology of working and recruiting new people without compromising the organisation.

“All members are protected by anonymity from other members. The amount of damage any member can cause is limited to the specific project they're working on, at worst. Each member goes through a long process of vetting and demonstrating actual work being done before they get any responsibility.”

Supporters of the hacker consortium in Serebryanka, Minsk
Belarusian Cyber Partisans

Apart from sorting the mass of data already acquired, the group says it is working on “other projects” it can’t yet talk about to preserve source security.

The personal information revealed as a result of the hack is arguably a violation of the subjects’ human right to privacy. In Belarus, unauthorised access of computer information is a crime punishable by up to two years in prison; the use of malware carries up to 10.

The CP spokesperson was clear on the group’s rationale. “We see ourselves as leaders of the resistance approach, which acknowledges that all democratic and peaceful ways of regime change have been exhausted in Belarus.

“Lukashenko hasn't left any options for the Belarusian people other than a revolt against the tyranny. We removed the masks of the regime's people that committed crimes.”
Why it's not just religion inflaming tensions between Serbia and Montenegro

By Aleksandar Brezar • Updated: 09/09/2021

Demonstrators gather at a barricade set up to block access roads to Cetinje during a protest against the inauguration of the new head of the Serbian Orthodox Church -
Copyright Credit: AFP

Orthodox priests dressed in their long, black garb, rushing out of a helicopter as their long grey hair and beards are blown all over the place by the propellers.

Riot police quickly unravel a black kevlar blanket to cover them up, while others with automatic rifles poised encircle the perimeter.

No, this is not a scene from Apocalypse Now.

Last weekend Montenegro, better known for its beautiful coast, striking mountain ranges -- and for hosting the odd Russian dissident over the years -- became the epicentre of a new Balkan crisis.

It happened when the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC) installed a new leader in a ceremony in Montenegro, angering some Montenegrins who saw it as a symbol of influence from its bigger neighbour.

SOC lost both its patriarch, or the head of the church, and the head of its branch in Montenegro, titled as metropolitan, in October and November of last year. Both contracted COVID-19 and died within less than a month.

The clashes happened in Cetinje 
Credit: Euronews


What's the history behind today's row?


Serbia and Montenegro are neighbouring countries that outsiders would consider culturally and historically similar. Yet among southern European Slavic nations, it's the differences that respective ethnic groups cling to the most strongly and that build the basis for their national identities -- especially in the post-socialist era.

Montenegro had a circuitous path towards independence that differs strongly from that of most Balkan or even European nations. It first became an independent principality in 1852, which is also the first time it declared the separation of church and state power.


A parliamentary decree in 1918 saw Montenegro, which was declared a kingdom in 1910, join Serbia and subsequently became a part of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.

The Montenegrin king at the time, Nikola I Petrović, fled to Marseille in 1916 after the country’s capitulation and occupation by Austro-Hungary and set up a government in exile.

Petrović and the Serbian royal family, the Karađorđevićs, were already bickering over how power should be shared before King Nikola I left the country. With him absent, and with the Serbian army still in the country at the very end of World War I, a Serbian government-appointed committee set up an ad hoc assembly in Podgorica to formalise the Karađorđević rule over Montenegro and its unification with Serbia.

A headline in The New York Times at the time called it “Annihilation of a Nation”. The remaining supporters of King Nikola rejected the union, which they saw as more of annexation and even instigated the Christmas rebellion of 1919, while Nikola petitioned the Paris Peace Conference to reinstate Montenegrin independence. It ended up being rejected.


While ethnic identities had a completely different meaning at that time, one of the reasons why a part of the local population accepted the Karađorđevićs was because they too had Montenegrin heritage. Even back then, there were debates about Montenegrin versus Serbian identity.

The political unification paved the way for the re-founding of the Serbian Orthodox Church in 1920 by the decree of the Yugoslav king, Aleksandar I Karađorđević, with the idea of unifying all Orthodox ecclesiastical provinces and eparchies under one rule.

“With the autochthonous Montenegrin Orthodox Church (MOC) now reduced to a metropolitanate or branch of the SOC, the SOC profited from the union, gaining rights to overall property deemed belonging to the Orthodox Church.

The crucial thing to remember is that this moment in history, when churches and their property in Montenegro became property of Serbia -- and then, property of the Serbian Orthodox Church -- would come to rear its head a century later.



A fight for the soul of the country


Yet because of their similarities -- including the fact that ethnic Montenegrins and ethnic Serbs are nominally Eastern Orthodox believers -- many in Montenegro feel that Serbia has preferred to erase their differences in its favour rather than grant their neighbours the right to determine what they call themselves, their language and their church.

This is why hundreds of Montenegrins gathered in Cetinje on Saturday, setting up barricades with large stones and car tyres, blocking the road with the goal of preventing the new metropolitan from being anointed.

Cetinje, a city founded in the 15th century, is located at the foot of Mount Lovćen and was the seat of the royal family. Home to the first printing press in Southeast Europe and the Cetinje Monastery, it is widely considered the cradle of Montenegrin culture.

On Sunday morning, with no signs of the inauguration being postponed, the protests turned ugly. Police tried to disperse the crowds by repeatedly firing canisters of teargas and flashbang grenades at the protesters gathered in Cetinje’s central promenade.

With the standoff entering its second day and the roads to the city still blocked, the metropolitan was flown in from Podgorica by helicopter. Joanikije and Patriarch Porfirije were hastily escorted into the monastery, and after a brief ceremony, flown back to Podgorica, while Cetinje was still covered in a cloud of teargas.

A total of 60 people were reported as injured — 20 police officers and 40 citizens.

Upon his departure to Belgrade on Sunday, Patriarch Porfirije stated in an Instagram post that he is leaving “this blessed land and people with mixed feelings.”

“I thank everyone and feel sorry for all of those who were hurt in some way and I ask for forgiveness. I pray to the Lord for this country, these people and all people, and I ask them to pray for me because they are closer to God,” he concluded.

Montenegro's coalition government was divided on how to handle the crisis.

While Prime Minister Zdravko Krivokapić called for peace on social media at the height of the protests, his coalition partner party, URA, asked for the ceremony to take place elsewhere.

Vice President of URA, Jovana Marović, told Euronews the church heads rejected this.

"URA made several appeals for the anointing of the Metropolitan to be moved to another location because of the security risks and increased tensions. The Metropolitanate did not want to consider that option, despite the barricades on the road and other risks. The only option left to the government was to guarantee the safety of the citizens in Cetinje and try to let the event take place without significant incidents," she explained.

However, this meant that the government found itself having to take one side, or none at all -- both being difficult choices, according to Marović.

"A segment of the citizens and political parties had expected the government to pick between two guaranteed rights, between the right of assembly and the right to religious freedoms. However, all rights are guaranteed and are equal, so the government tried to provide both."

The protesters were angry that their own government provided a helicopter for the ceremony, while others were upset that PM Krivokapić participated in a celebratory lunch with the SOC immediately after the event in Cetinje. Still, others thought that there should have been harsher reactions to the roadblocks.

"Certain parties in the governing coalition reacted harshly to Sunday's events, so can expect the political sparring to become even more intense," she said. URA has positioned itself as the country’s only true civic movement. It is the junior coalition partner in a government formed by Krivokapić's For the Future of Montenegro, a populist party that pushed out the long-ruling Democratic Party of Socialists, or DPS, in elections held last year.

Krivokapić, a Montenegrin university professor, rose to prominence during a series of protests in reaction to a law on religion began in late 2019. The law intended to effectively reverse the takeover of what was once Montenegrin church property after 1918 and return it to the state. The protests were led by senior members of the Serbian Orthodox Church.

The original law proposed by DPS passed in late December 2019 — dubbed the 'Law on Religious Freedoms' — pledged to return all property granted to the SOC after 1918, unless they had proof of ownership prior to that year.
Head of the Serbian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Porfirije, centre, and Metropolitan Joanikije, left
Credit: AP


National versus religious identity

The role of the SOC was never simply that of a religious institution, explains Ivan Videnović, associate professor at the University of Belgrade.

"The SOC with its 'one faith, one people' doctrine was an important political actor in all phases of the modern history of the Balkans it had any influence on,” says Videnović.

When the SOC initially took over church properties in the early 20th century and became the main ‘umbrella’ for all Eastern Orthodox Churches in the region, it did so to centralise the Orthodox believers in a region where Catholic and Muslim believers were also common.

Could you be Serb and not Orthodox? Or Orthodox and not Serb? At that time, and especially before the 20th century, yes. But as the church became more powerful and formed stronger ties to the political project of the Serbian nation-state, this became less acceptable.

“This doctrine doesn't recognise the existence of Muslim Serbs or Catholic Serbs, just like it doesn't recognise the existence of Orthodox Montenegrins or Orthodox Macedonians,” Videnović explained.

This is why some Montenegrins feel strongly about having their own autocephalous or recognised independent Church. If one side spent the past century claiming that if you were part of the Serbian Orthodox Church you were a Serb, then there is a need for a Montenegrin Orthodox Church.

"This leaves the majority Montenegrin population in a civic state like Montenegro either without its own church or in a situation to bow down to the church that doesn't recognise their ethnic origin or their language. The denial of Montenegrin identity in the past years was often accompanied by outbursts of hate speech by the SOC dignitaries toward the Montenegrin ethnic group or the government of Montenegro," he said.
Montenegro: the last Yugoslav crisis

Montenegro only became a distinct territory again after World War II as one of the six republics of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia.

As adherence to the communist ideology of secularism weakened and nationalist tendencies became more prominent, the SOC regained its prominence as a key political factor.

Slobodan Milošević, a communist apparatchik that later became the main proponent of Serbian nationalism, realised that he needed the church as a tool to rally ethnic Serbs around his political mission. Milošević's incitement of ultranationalist Serbian sentiments as early as the mid-1980s is widely regarded as one of the primary triggers of the bloody dissolution of Yugoslavia and the ensuing wars.

After the breakup of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, Montenegro was the only one of the six to remain in the union with Serbia. At a moment when the fault lines of the conflict were between those considered Catholic, Muslim, Orthodox or Albanian, the two main Orthodox nations in Yugoslavia -- the Serbs and the Montenegrins -- didn’t openly clash or engage in warfare. In fact, Montenegro participated in the wars together with Serbia. The current president of Montenegro, Milo Đukanović, was one of Milošević’s closest allies -- at least at first.

Đukanović has been a key political actor in Montenegro since the late 1980s when he rose to prominence with Milošević’s support. Starting in 1991, he served as the country's PM four times and is in his second mandate as president. Although initially, he was loyal to Milošević's cause, having his government send troops to Croatia and playing a role in the war in Bosnia, Đukanović did a U-turn in the mid-1990s, openly criticising Milošević and his regime and eventually distancing himself and the country from Serbia altogether.

The bread and butter of Đukanović's political rhetoric and the main reason behind his unusual political longevity — as marred as it has been with constant accusations of significant corruption and participation in organised crime — was tying his change of heart to him becoming the main advocate Montenegrin identity as distinct and separate concept.

His party's proposal to take away the SOC's property was a step too far, however, and Đukanović underestimated the power the SOC wielded in Montenegro. This was actively exploited by the Serbian government, which according to Videnović, has instrumentalised the SOC to regain some of its lost influence since 2006.

"The government in Belgrade is the main factor responsible for the current situation, for playing the endangered collective interest of Serbs in a country where true human rights were never denied to anyone, for involving the SOC in the [2020] electoral race, and for influencing the appointment of the current government of Montenegro," Videnović claims.
Smoke rises from burning tires which protesters set fire at one of the blockades near Cetinje, Montenegro, Sunday, Sept. 5, 2021
Credit: AP

"This is why ethnic Montenegrins perceive the current government as Belgrade's puppet, while the entire process of clericalisation of the country is further seen as an attempt to take away their national identity, state independence and interethnic accord."

But the previous rule of the country's current president Milo Đukanović and his DPS is also to blame.

"Đukanović's responsibility lies in the fact that he failed to include the more Europe-oriented Montenegrin Serbs into his program of a civic, multinational society. They felt rejected by his overemphasis on the particularity of Montenegrin identity all the way to the return to the archaic divisions from the past," Videnović concludes.

Đukanović's opponents saw this as an opportunity to gather support and, finally, dethrone him. The SOC's help proved to be vital, says Ljubomir Filipović, activist and executive coordinator of the 21st May Civic Initiative. The movement was one of the participants in last weekend’s protests in Cetinje.

"The SOC used the discontent over the church property law to launch a campaign of clerical protests and rallies which coincided with the pre-electoral campaign in the country," he said, "and the political subjects close to these protests won the elections in the country."

A new leadership does not necessarily mean a better one, Filipović believes.

"A corrupt government with a multitude of problems was replaced by another government that engaged in historical revisionism and supported ideologies that were responsible for the nationalist euphoria that led to the conflicts in the 1990s," Filipović explains.

"A minister in the current government was recently removed from his position for denying the Srebrenica genocide. They want to maintain the appearance of having pro-Western leanings because they know that not doing so would endanger their power."

"They now insist on blaming all the problems in the country on the Democratic Party of Socialists, who lost power and key positions in the country, so they want the protests in Cetinje to be seen as a result of DPS's anger over losing power – which is not true," he said.

According to Filipović, the protest movement is, in fact, very diverse.

"Reducing it to what people are calling Montenegrin nationalism is just as unfair as reducing the entire Euromaidan in Ukraine movement to fascists. There is a wide spectrum that's included, from the left to the right, but our goal is to subvert the clerical and Serbian political influences on Montenegrin politics," Filipović explains.

The protests against the inauguration in Cetinje rejected the symbolic act of the subjugation of Montenegro to take place in Cetinje, and many are extraordinarily angry, Filipović said.

The MOC, whose ecclesiastical independence or autocephaly was never formally recognised, had a revival in the early 1990s, and became a recognised religious community by the country's government in 1999.

A 2020 poll by a Montenegrin NGO CEDEM showed that about 10 per cent of Montenegro's Orthodox Christian faithful see it as their church. It has its metropolitan, Mihailo, also seated in Cetinje.

But the MOC has little if any political influence on what goes on in Montenegro -- a stark contrast to the SOC's leaders, who are very present in public and often outspoken in their ultraconservative views.

Joanikije's predecessor, Amfilohije, famously supported the wartime Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadžić, admitting in 2010 that he offered him a place to hide after the ICTY indicted Karadžić for war crimes in Bosnia right after the 1992-1995 war.
'Everyone looks bad after Sunday'

Sunday’s inauguration of the new metropolitan has now tarnished Joanikije's legacy from the very start of his headship, according to Daliborka Uljarević, executive director of the Center for Civic Education, a Montenegrin civil society nonprofit.

"Instead of it being a dignified event, they had to be smuggled into the monastery encircled by police with automatic rifles. How can someone who is a true Christian live with the weight of such an anointment?"

"The SOC is not a winner here," Uljarević said. "The church has to have a conciliatory influence on society, and not the opposite. To try and find solutions that are outside the expected framework and not to ignite tensions."

"I think Metropolitan Joanikije's statement that he will work on dialogue and reconciliation is hypocritical, considering that he lost the legitimacy to discuss these topics by forcing this event," she stated.

"He could have won so much support and legitimacy if he himself had decided to pull out of the ceremony and said I see that this is antagonising the society."

For Montenegrin citizens of all ethnicities, another layer of frustration comes from the fact that the situation's complexity is unfamiliar and confusing to many outside of the country, making it hard to comprehend even to Montenegro's closest neighbours.

"Montenegro didn't attract much attention for many years – it wasn't a regional problem," Uljarević stated.

"These past years, questions that were previously an extremely internal issue and that were complex for Montenegrin society to deal with have now been spilt outside of our borders."

When it comes to finding the right solution and reuniting the country and its citizens, this is not an issue that can be settled overnight according to Uljarević -- despite PM Krivokapić's congratulatory tone at a press conference on Monday, where he said that the country is now free to move on to resolving other issues, such as its economic woes.

"I'd define what's happening in Montenegro as a political issue that has been fused with a religious and identity issue, which then brings various emotions to the fore and mobilises people," she said.

"Montenegrin society now needs to go back and address issues that were kept on the backburner and to try and reach an agreement on what sort of country we want."
Activists in San Marino fight fierce campaigns over historic abortion law

By Catherine Bennett • Updated: 20/09/2021 - 

People view pro and anti-abortion campaign posters on September 10, 2021 in San Marino at the start of the referendum campaign -
 Copyright BRIGITTE HAGEMANN/AFP or licensors


In a small town hall in one of the tiniest countries in Europe, a passionate debate over abortion is raging.

Activists on stage grapple for the microphone, while audience members stand up to interject.

“We can ban abortion, but it still happens. Abortion exists in San Marino, and unsafe abortions exist!” declares Gloria Giardi on stage, to applause from the audience.

In the Republic of San Marino, nestled on the Apennine mountains inside Italy, campaigning is underway ahead of a referendum on September 26, which will ask its 33,000 citizens if they want to legalise abortion.

Giardi is a member of the Union of Sammarinese Women (UDS), a group of feminist activists that have been trying for years to propose legislation on abortion, only to have conservative governments dismiss each attempt.


UDS campaigners are hoping to take advantage of the momentum created by other European countries recently legalising abortion, like Ireland and Gibraltar.

San Marino set to hold a referendum on whether to legalise abortion

“We have been waiting 43 years for this law. We shouldn’t have to propose a referendum – it should already be law,” she continues.

San Marino is one of only four European countries where abortion is completely illegal, even in cases of rape, incest, severe foetal abnormality or when the mother’s life is at risk.

Just as in Andorra, Malta, and Vatican City, women in San Marino face prison time if they try to get an abortion or if they help someone else procure an abortion. Many Sammarinese women who want to terminate a pregnancy travel to Italy, where abortion was legalised in 1978.

But the situation isn’t always easy over the border. Italian doctors have the right to "conscientious objection" and to refuse to carry out the procedure. As many as 71% of gynaecologists in Italy are registered as conscientious objectors – meaning that even in Italy, women can struggle to find somewhere to get an abortion before it is too late.
‘These women are alone’

Laura (Euronews is using a pseudonym to protect her identity) found out she was pregnant at the age of 39. She already had two children. At later check-ups, doctors told her they couldn’t detect a heartbeat. Laura wasn’t ready to have another child and was anxious about the uncertain health of the foetus. She decided to get an abortion, for which she had to go to Rimini, an hour away by bus in Italy’s Emilia-Romagna region.

“I had to do a series of tests in Rimini that I paid for, then about 10 days later they rang me to tell me when to come in for the procedure,” she explained in an anonymous testimony given to UDS. The abortion itself cost her €1,000.

“I think it’s horrendous that in 2021 a Sammarinese woman is forced to go through the Italian health system and has to pay her own way,” she said.

Mexican Supreme Court decriminalises abortion in 'historic ruling'

UDS activists have denounced the "hypocrisy" of a law that bans the procedure but looks the other way when women travel just a few kilometres away to get it done, for a cost of between €1,000 to €2,000. Because San Marino is not in the European Union, Sammarinese women cannot benefit from free healthcare in Italy.

Francesca Nicolini is a GP and cardiologist in San Marino. She told Euronews that the financial crisis and then Italy’s subsequent banking crisis had a huge impact on personal wealth in San Marino.

“People’s salaries are low now. Many people don’t have enough money to pay for an abortion through the Italian health system,” she said. “But money isn’t the only problem. Making the decision to abort is very difficult, and there’s no support here. These women are alone. That is the worst thing.”
‘We always get there in the end’

San Marino is historically a Catholic country, and the church still has a strong influence, even at a political level. “We celebrate life, right from the beginning to the end,” Antonella Mularoni, a campaigner for the opposition side Uno di Noi, told the audience at the debate, “including for those who aren’t able to defend themselves”.

One of the flashpoints in the referendum campaigns has been a controversial poster from Uno di Noi, which shows a young man with Down’s syndrome. The text asks, "I’m an anomaly. Does that mean I have fewer rights than you?" Just days after campaigning officially began, there are gaps on notice boards across the country where the poster has been ripped down.

Yes campaigners condemned Uno di Noi for their “instrumentalisation” of a person with disabilities, and even those on the No side distanced themselves from the message. Teodoro Lonfernini, a politician from the right-wing Sammarinese Christian Democratic Party, described the poster as “inappropriate”, adding, “I say yes to life, but no to this kind of messaging”.

Abortion in Gibraltar: Voters say yes in referendum to ease strict law

The poster also claimed that the new law would grant women the right to abort up until the 9th month of pregnancy in case of disability. Nicolini scoffs at the idea. “Abortion at nine months is medically impossible,” she says. “It is called pre-term delivery, because at that stage, the foetus is usually able to survive outside of the womb.”

Even Sammarinese activists themselves have been taken aback at the ferocity of the campaign. But who will win is anyone’s guess: there have been no opinion polls in the country, and neither side wants to make a prediction about which way the vote will fall. UDS activists believe that the vote is roughly split along lines of age and religion, with young, secular voters more likely to vote to legalise abortion.

If San Marino votes yes, the law will immediately come into force. At the town hall debate, Giardi says that it is just a matter of time before the country’s laws catch up with neighbouring Italy. “San Marino will eventually fall in line with European legislation,” she says. “We always get there in the end.”
EXPROPRIATE ENTEIGNEN
Berlin referendum: Voters mull one of Europe’s most radical ripostes to gentrification

By Dave Braneck • Updated: 16/09/2021

A poster urging voters to gote 'Yes' on a referendum on housing due to be held the same day as Germany's federal election. - Copyright Euronews/ Dave Braneck

Germany’s looming federal elections, set to determine who will fill Angela Merkel’s over-sized shoes after her 16-year reign as chancellor, are dominating the global discussion about German politics.

But voters will be weighing in on much more than Merkel’s successor on Sunday. State elections in Berlin also fall on September 26, and a referendum that could send shockwaves throughout Europe is on the ballot.

Residents in the capital will decide if Berlin should expropriate so-called "mega-landlords". If so, the law will be one of Europe’s most radical responses to gentrification and the rising cost of housing, socialising roughly 240,000 apartments.

What's the background to Berlin’s referendum?


The referendum campaign, called Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen after one of Germany’s biggest property companies, is a reflection of growing frustration and helplessness among renters in the city.

Once known as one of the most affordable capitals on the continent, exploding rents have rendered Berlin a symbol of increasingly common urban struggles with housing costs.

Berlin has consistently registered some of the fastest-rising housing prices in the world in recent years. Though still relatively low compared to Europe’s other global cities like London or Paris, rents in Berlin have doubled in the decade between 2009 and 2019.

And while Berlin’s hip reputation and burgeoning tech sector have added a varnish of gloss to the city’s grit, wages remain low. Despite being the capital, Berlin is ranked 11th of Germany’s 16 states in per-capita income, below the country’s average.

According to Kalle Kunkel, an activist with the Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen campaign, housing costs don’t just put pressure on low-wage earners, they threaten to unweave the fabric of the city.

“The city’s low-wage earners, of which there are many, are already facing too high of a burden just to pay their rent. 80-85% of Berliners are renters, which means an overwhelming majority of the city has to face this social reality.

"And unlike other cities, Berlin isn’t particularly economically segregated. That people from different social brackets live among one another is a big part of this city’s identity, and what makes it so interesting.”

Though speculation in real estate has grown globally in recent years, the city of Berlin has significantly exacerbated the issue by selling off its public housing stock at a pittance after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Since 1990, Berlin has sold roughly 200,000 apartments to hedge funds and private equity firms.

Meanwhile, the city has grown significantly in the last decade, putting further pressure on the housing market.

“The city’s growth has outstripped the building of new apartments. There’s a real housing scarcity, which has helped make landlords incredibly powerful,” Kunkel told Euronews.

Finding a new apartment, regardless of the price range, is often a demoralising and gladiatorial experience. Renters frequently take whatever they can get, knowing they cannot afford to be picky.

Couple Simon and Georgina moved to Berlin four years ago, bouncing around between short-term sublets for a year before finding an apartment of their own.

“We moved in and thought, the rent is too high already but it’s the only place we could get,” Simon told Euronews. They were paying 900 euros a month without utilities for a two-bedroom apartment, knowing that neighbours in the same building on older contracts were paying significantly less.

This was likely due in part to a hasty renovation carried out in the apartment shortly before their arrival.

“Our place was renovated, but it was all done extremely quickly. Most stuff wasn’t even finished when we moved in, and when we’d write to the property management firm we’d never get a response,” said Georgina.

Reiner Wild, director of the Berlin Tenant’s Union (BMV), told Euronews that modernising apartments between tenants is a common tactic used by landlords to raise rents. According to Wild, raising rents between contracts has a major impact on the rental market.

“A significant majority of new rental agreements include a drastic price increase over former contracts, which means the process of new tenants coming into apartments helps to slowly erode the number of affordable apartments in the city… This also means renters are less likely to move out, as moving can be very costly. Which makes searching for a new apartment all the more difficult,” said Wild.
Aerial view of the Wilmersdorf district with office buildings and apartment houses close to the catholic St. Ludwig church in Berlin
Credit: AP


Berlin's failed attempt to freeze rents


Just as Berlin is demonstrative of runaway housing costs in many major cities, it’s taken a leading role in experimenting with far-reaching housing regulations.

The current referendum, pushed by the Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen campaign, is just the latest attempt in Berlin to reign in the housing market. It’s coming off the heels of the controversial overturning of Berlin’s rent cap in April.

The rent cap was introduced in February 2020 and froze rents in 90% of the city’s apartments for five years, while providing rent reductions for many residents. It was ruled unconstitutional because it was enacted on the state level and was deemed to override federal housing legislation.

Before the rent cap, tenants were typically left on their own to fight overcharges and illegal practices. Berlin already had a fairly robust set of renter protections aimed at curtailing rising rents, but struggles to enforce these rules. The rent-cap strengthened and automated this process.

Knowing their rent was significantly higher than it should have been when they moved in, Simon and Georgina pushed back. With the BMV’s support, they entered a year-long battle to lower their rent, which had been raised to an illegally high level between contracts. After the protracted spat ended in court, their rent was reduced by roughly 25%.

“When we first moved in, rent was about 50% of my income, so the reduction was really nice,” said Simon.

The rent reduction has also given them a level of financial independence they previously lacked. “It definitely was (a financial strain). Especially because as a couple we do things evenly. At the time I could afford it but it put pressure on me to stay in the job I was at the time because if I’d leave we couldn’t pay our rent,” said Georgina.

Berlin votes to freeze rent prices for five years
Berlin's rent cap is illegal, Germany's top court rules
Berlin starts controversial rent freeze on 1.5 million homes
'This is madness': Berliners face rent rises as pandemic's economic impact bites

Though they did get their rent reduced in the end, not everyone in the city can enter a protracted legal battle with their landlords to prevent illegal rent hikes. The rent cap provided blanket relief to the city and required landlords to comply immediately. That the cap was overturned in the midst of the pandemic has hit many Berlin residents particularly hard. Not only did rents go back up, but many renters also had to pay back the savings they accrued while the rent cap was enacted.

Though this moment was bitter for many renters and housing activists, it has served to provide momentum to what is a much more radical proposal: the campaign to expropriate the city’s mega-landlords.
Protesters confront police during a mass rally to protest against a court ruling removing a rent cap in Berlin, Germany, Thursday April 15
Credit: AP


What could Berlin's referendum change?


The campaign calls for any private landlord holding more than 3,000 apartments to be socialised and for the apartments to be converted into public housing, with the cost of buying the apartments back to be reimbursed over time by renters. Rent would go down, as the housing would no longer be focused on accruing profit.

The campaign officially launched in 2018, but according to activist Kalle Kunkel, the concept arose years before as various disparate tenants’ rights organisations considered how to most effectively combine their campaigns.

“(One of the organisations) made the point that we’ve actually already paid for these apartments 100 times over with our rent, why don’t we just take them back. Really, they belong to us.”

The idea stuck and has been gaining momentum ever since. 175,000 signatures are required to trigger a city-wide referendum, and the campaign nearly doubled that with 343,000.

Though many, particularly those in the real estate industry and politicians in the conservative CDU and liberal FDP opposition parties, have criticised the proposal, Kunkel takes their points in stride.

“We want to make the roughly 250,000 apartments currently in the hands of finance-focused actors affordable in the long term, so that people won’t get displaced. And a side effect of the campaign is that speculation in Berlin is seen as being dangerous. Which I think is a good thing,” said Kunkel.

In a written statement to Euronews, Deutsche Wohnen criticised the campaign, claiming it will fail to solve the challenges facing the Berlin housing market, and that, “expropriation in Berlin is impossible, as it is unconstitutional and financially unfeasible for Berlin’s residents.”

If the referendum passes, the biggest question will be its constitutionality. Though expropriation for the public good is explicitly allowed by the German constitution, whether expropriation on this scale fits that description will be up to Germany’s highest courts.

There is also a significant gap between projected costs for socialisation, with Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen calculating the project to cost roughly 8 billion euros, and the Berlin Senate estimating it to be closer to 30 billion.

According to Kunkel the exact costs will depend on whether or not the city pays market-rate prices for each apartment it socialises. Though expropriation law requires a ‘just’ reimbursement for anything being socialised, determining if that means market rates will be a political decision the city may have to face. Recent buybacks of private apartments have tended to be close to market value.

The Berlin-Brandenburg Association of Real Estate Companies (BBU), of which Deutsche Wohnen and other large landlords are members, has positioned itself against expropriation. Dr David Eberhart, the BBU’s spokesperson, told Euronews that the proposal was unlikely to be found constitutional and would be untenable to implement given Berlin’s struggles with existing regulatory enforcement.

Eberhart went on to say that, “Though it is completely understandable that people are worried about housing and rent in Berlin, we maintain that the only thing that can help this situation is the expansion of supply. And not just anything, but affordable rental apartments. But they need to be built.”

Though new apartments tend to be expensive in Berlin unless explicitly built as social housing. Rents in 85% of newly-built apartments in 2020 were significantly higher than social-housing levels.

Berlin residents are currently split nearly evenly on whether or not they think expropriation is the solution the city needs. In recent polling, the campaign held a slight lead, with 47% of responders supporting the initiative and 43% against it.

Campaign organisers know that even if the referendum passes, their work isn’t done. “The last word has yet to be spoken. The last step of the campaign will come after the election. We’ll have to keep up the pressure after what will hopefully be a positive result, to ensure that it's enacted politically by the city,” said Kunkel.

If it does go through, there will be serious challenges in implementation. Centre-left party SPD candidate for mayor Franziska Giffey recently spoke out against the initiative, which means crafting the explicit terms of expropriation would be a difficult, politicised process, which would then have to face judicial review and be found constitutional.

If the referendum doesn’t succeed, Berlin will have to once again go back to the drawing board and consider another means of solving its acute housing crisis, which will not go away on its own any time soon.

Every weekday, Uncovering Europe brings you a European story that goes beyond the headlines. Download the Euronews app to get a daily alert for this and other breaking news notifications. It's available on Apple and Android devices.
Non-profit calls on government to investigate alleged neglect at Stephenville care home

Sun., September 19, 2021

Ray McIsaac, a board member with the Newfoundland and Labrador Association for Community Living, says after learning of Allison Decker's situation his group fears the progress it has made is backsliding. (Colleen Connors/CBC - image credit)

Colleen Connors/CBC

The Newfoundland and Labrador Association for Community Living is calling on the provincial government to investigate the alleged abuse and neglect of a disabled woman inside a Stephenville care home.

Allison Decker had been living in a basement apartment in the western Newfoundland town, and was under 24-hour care from staff of the Bay St. George Residential Support Board.

Decker, 46, developed intellectual disabilities after suffering multiple seizures that caused significant brain damage just days after she was born.

Minette Firth, Decker's sister, recently told CBC News she was shocked when she arrived at her sister's care home in July and found there to be no television or books and a locked refrigerator.

Decker also told Firth she had been locked inside the apartment for hours.

Ray McIsaac, a board member with the Newfoundland and Labrador Association for Community Living, a non-profit that offers resources for people with intellectual disabilities, told CBC News his organization has for decades helped get people away from institutional life and move them to community-based support systems.

After learning of Decker's alleged situation, he fears that progress is backsliding.

"This case specifically, of this young lady being abused, neglected and mistreated [by] the Residential Support Board, is a sad development for our association, because the association was instrumental in setting up the co-operative apartment delivery system in partnership with the provincial government," McIsaac said.

"Over time, I guess what's happened here is this particular agency has drifted away from the core values of the association and our belief in the integrity and equal rights of all persons with disabilities."

Submitted by Minette Firth

Funding for companies like the Residential Support Board comes the province's Department of Health and Community Services. Additional funding may be provided by the Community Support Program through Western Health if clients are eligible.

Western Health has told CBC News it's investigating the situation but won't comment on individual circumstances.

Letter to government


McIsaac said his association wrote a letter to Health Minister John Haggie and Justice Minister John Hogan in August, calling for an immediate investigation.

He said the association feels their concerns could have criminal implications for the staff and management of the Residential Support Board.

They're asking government to investigate procedures and policies on a larger scale to ensure support boards and the overseeing boards of directors are operating properly across the province.

"Are people's rights being respected? Are people being over-medicated, as an example, to facilitate the ease of care because of understaffing? Are people being restrained and locked away, punished or ridiculed as in some of the allegations that have arisen out of this particular case," McIsaac said.

"I think, obviously, for something like this to happen there has to be a breakdown from an accountability perspective. Things didn't get here overnight. I think we have to consider that there has to be some kind of audit function, some kind of accountability."

CBC News also asked for comment from the Department of Children, Seniors and Social Development, which is responsible for the provincial Adult Protection Act, but received no response.

Michelle King, executive director of the Bay St. George Residential Support Board, declined comment.

Delta variant means we need to change pandemic response tactics: expert

Sun., September 19, 2021

Canadians need to reach at least 85 per cent vaccination rates to contest with the highly contagious delta variant, explains microbiologist and germ expert Jason Tetro. (Dave Macintosh/CBC - image credit)

When the delta variant came into play in Canada in the spring, leaders didn't take sufficient notice, Jason Tetro, a microbiologist and author of The Germ Files, said. Now, they really need to start.

"I really think … you have to separate this pandemic into two stages: you've got the delta era, and the pre-delta era and now we're in the delta era," Tetro told Peter Mills on CBC's Saskatchewan Weekend.

In Saskatchewan, about one in five cases are variants of concern, the province's COVID-19 dashboard said. Of those about 10,825 have been sequenced and identified.

As of Sunday, about 30 per cent of those, or 3,298, were the delta variant, the Saskatchewan government's dashboard showed. It stopped testing for variant type on Sept. 13 to support overall COVID-19 testing.

"If we don't shift gears soon and thankfully many provinces ... are starting to do that, the last 18 months are going to look pretty mild to what we're about to go through," Tetro said.

Tetro had previously predicted a 40 per cent vaccination rate would fend off the earlier variants of the virus. But, the delta variant is much stronger and transmissible than its predecessors. He said that it transmits in a way comparable to the common cold.

"When delta showed up … we did not take that into consideration when it came to figuring out how we should be doing the reopening," Tetro said.

"When we … in Alberta, hit the 70 per cent [of people vaccinated with one dose], we all of a sudden opened up absolutely everything. And, now we realize that's probably not what we should have done."

Saskatchewan has been nearing or breaking records for cases and hospitalizations. On Sunday, there were 543 new cases in the province—the highest number yet.

The delta variant can cause more severe illness and makes up to 1,000 times more of the virus than the original COVID-19 virus, studies suggest. He expects the country will need to vaccinate 85 per cent of people to contest with this most concerning variant.

In Saskatchewan, about 72 per cent of eligible people have been fully vaccinated and 80 per cent have received at least one dose, according to CBC's vaccine tracker. When looking at the entire provincial population, including those ineligible, rates drop to 61 and 68 per cent, respectively.

In contrast, 69 per cent of all Canadians are fully vaccinated and 79 per cent of eligible Canadians are as well.

How we ought to respond


Tetro believes that government responses needs to adapt to the delta variant, something that didn't happen over the summer. In Saskatchewan, the public health order that mandated masks in public settings and limited business hours among other things, was lifted in July. Since then, cases have risen exponentially to early 2021 levels.

Government response now, he argues, should include vaccination measures, like passports, and masking—some of which has been recently announced in Saskatchewan and Alberta.

"I can be pretty confident, and remember I was already wrong once (about the virus increase), that this will probably be the last wave for this particular virus — delta variant," he said.

"But again we do need to get to that 85 per cent vaccination rate and that really is where we need to be focused."

Lockdowns, however, may not be as effective if they were to be enforced again, he said.

"You can only get away with lockdowns once or twice or maybe three times and then people start to get angry, people start to get tired … and then all of a sudden what happens is that lockdowns are just avoided," Tetro said.






How Kenney's "Best Summer Ever" may have affected vaccine rates

In the face of a fourth wave that has overwhelmed the healthcare system, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney this week declared a state of public health emergency, reintroducing some of the restrictions that were lifted in the summer and unveiling a proof of vaccination system that he previously resisted due to privacy concerns. It’s a stark, 180-degree change from July, when the Premier proclaimed the province was “open for summer” and the United Conservative Party was selling hats declaring “Best Summer Ever.”

On this episode of Crisis Management, Alicja Siekierska and the Public Policy Forum’s Sean Speer discuss the COVID-19 situation in Alberta, how the province got to where it is today, and what impact the Premier’s “Best Summer Ever” plan may have had on the province’s vaccination rate.

For more exclusive content from the show, download the Crisis Management podcast on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.





PATHETIQUE
Senate Democrats hit roadblock in bid to help millions become U.S. citizens


David Shepardson
Sun., September 19, 2021

U.S. Democratic senators face reporters following weekly
 policy lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington


By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Senate Democrats hit a major roadblock on Sunday in their effort to allow millions of immigrants to legally stay in the United States, after the Senate Parliamentarian ruled against attaching the measure to a $3.5 trillion spending bill, lawmakers said.

The provision aimed to give a path to citizenship for millions, including so-called Dreamer immigrants, brought to the United States as children, who are protected from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Farmworkers, essential workers and immigrants with temporary protected status, which gives work permits and deportation relief to those hailing from nations hit by violence or natural disasters, also stood to benefit.

In a statement, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats were "deeply disappointed in this decision but the fight to provide lawful status for immigrants in budget reconciliation continues."

Senate Democrats have prepared alternate proposals and aimed to hold further meetings with the Senate parliamentarian, Schumer added.

A legislative remedy has become all the more pressing since a July court ruling that struck down DACA, which now protects around 640,000 young immigrants.

Sunday's ruling was "deeply disappointing," a White House spokesperson said, but added, "We fully expect our partners in the Senate to come back with alternative immigration-related proposals for the parliamentarian to consider."

On Twitter, Senator Chuck Grassley, the Judiciary Committee's top Republican, praised the parliamentarian's ruling, saying, "Mass amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants isn’t a budgetary issue appropriate for reconciliation."

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said, "Democrats will not be able to stuff their most radical amnesty proposals into the reckless taxing and spending spree they are assembling behind closed doors."

An estimate in Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough's ruling, obtained by Reuters, showed the step would have helped about 8 million people become lawful permanent residents, including about 7 million now deemed to infringe the law.

MacDonough said that if the reform were allowed to proceed in a budget bill a future Senate could then rescind anyone's immigration status on the basis of a majority vote.

That would be a "stunning development ... and is further evidence that the policy changes of this proposal far outweigh the budgetary impact scored to it," she added.

"It is not appropriate for inclusion in reconciliation."

Lawful permanent status allows people to work, travel, live openly in U.S. society and become eligible, in time, to apply for citizenship, MacDonough said.

As the Senate's parliamentarian, MacDonough, in the job since 2012 under both Republicans and Democrats, advises lawmakers about what is acceptable under the chamber's rules and precedents, sometimes with lasting consequences.

Chosen by the Senate majority leader, the holder of the job is expected to be non-partisan.

Early this year, MacDonough barred inclusion of a minimum wage hike in a COVID-19 aid bill.

Most U.S. Senate bills require support from 60 of the 100 members to go to a vote. Budget reconciliation measures, however, can clear the chamber on a simple majority vote, in which case Vice President Kamala Harris could break the tie.

The proposed designation of essential workers covered 18 major categories and more than 220 sub-categories of employment, MacDonough said in the ruling.

DACA beneficiaries receive work authorization, access to driver's licenses and better access, for some, to financial aid for education, but not a path to citizenship.

The law protects primarily young Hispanic adults born in Mexico and countries in Central and South America who were brought to the United States as children.

(Reporting by David Shepardson; additional reporting by Mica Rosenberg and Susan Cornwell Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

Daniel Barenboim plays Beethoven Sonata No. 8 Op. 13 (Pathetique)


KAPITALI$M IS KRISIS
U.S. opens probe into 30 million vehicles over air bag inflators


David Shepardson
Sun., September 19, 2021

FILE PHOTO: People crowd San Diego beaches on July Fourth weekend


By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. auto safety investigators have opened a new probe into 30 million vehicles built by nearly two dozen automakers with potentially defective Takata air bag inflators, a government document seen by Reuters on Sunday showed.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on Friday opened an engineering analysis into an estimated 30 million U.S. vehicles from the 2001 through 2019 model years. Automakers were alerted to the investigation, which is not yet public.

The new investigation includes vehicles assembled by Honda Motor Co, Ford Motor Co, Toyota Motor Corp, General Motors Co, Nissan Motor, Subaru, Tesla, Ferrari NV , Nissan Motor, Mazda, Daimler AG, BMW Chrysler (now part of Stellantis NV), Porsche Cars, Jaguar Land Rover (owned by Tata Motors) and others.

The automakers on Sunday either declined to comment before NHTSA's expected public announcement on Monday, or did not immediately respond to requests for comment. NHTSA declined to comment.

The 30 million vehicles include both vehicles that had the inflators installed when they were manufactured as well as some inflators that were used in prior recall repairs, NHTSA said in the document.

Over the last decade, more than 67 million Takata air bag inflators have been recalled in the United States -- and more than 100 million worldwide -- in the biggest auto safety callback in history because inflators can send deadly metal fragments flying in rare instances.

There have been at least 28 deaths worldwide, including 19 in the United States tied to faulty Takata inflators and more than 400 injuries.

The 30 million vehicles that are part of the new investigation have inflators with a "desiccant" or drying agent. According to the document, NHTSA said there have been no reported ruptures of vehicles on the roads with air bag inflators with the drying agent.

"While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators," NHTSA said in opening its engineering analysis seen by Reuters. "Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators."

NHTSA has said the cause of the inflator explosions tied to the recall of 67 million inflators that can emit deadly fragments is propellant breaking down after long-term exposure to high temperature fluctuations and humidity. The agency has required all similar Takata without a drying agent to be recalled.

In the United States, 16 deaths in Honda vehicles have been reported, two in Ford vehicles and one in a BMW, while 9 other Honda deaths occurred in Malaysia, Brazil and Mexico.

NHTSA did not immediately release a breakdown of how many vehicles per manufacturer are covered by the probe.

The safety agency said the investigation "will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field."

Earlier this year, NHTSA said of the 67 million recalled inflators, approximately 50 million have been repaired or are otherwise accounted for.

(Reporting by David Shepardson; editing by Diane Craft)