Monday, May 08, 2023

Adidas is currently stuck with US$1.3B worth of unsold Yeezy shoes

 It's been nearly seven months since Adidas split with the rapper formerly known as Kanye West, and boxes of his popular Yeezy shoes are still piled up in warehouses.

The fate of 1.2 billion euros (US$1.3 billion) worth of unsold Yeezy stock is weighing on the German sportswear company as it tries to engineer a turnaround from the loss of the lucrative sneaker line and the continued fallout over its former ties to Ye.

Adidas is “getting closer and closer to making a decision” on what to do with the sneakers and the “options are narrowing,” new CEO Bjorn Gulden said in a conference call Friday after reporting 400 million euros ($441 million) in lost sales at the start of the year.

But with “so many interested parties” involved in the discussions, no decision had yet been reached, he said.

Adidas is stuck with stacks of its flagship Yeezy brand shoes after ending its relationship with Ye in October over his antisemitic and other offensive comments on social media and in interviews.

Gulden, who became CEO in January after the Ye split, declined to say if destroying the shoes had been ruled out but that the company was “trying to avoid that.”

He has previously said other options have drawbacks: selling the sneakers would mean paying royalties to Ye, restitching them to remove the brand identification would be dishonest, and giving them away to people in need could lead to resale because of their high market value.

Gulden would not say how many pairs of Yeezy shoes that Adidas is stuck holding “because then the consumer would know how many we have and that could have an impact on demand.”

Losing the Yeezy brand is “of course hurting us,” Gulden said in a statement. The breakup will reduce earnings by 500 million euros this year if Adidas decides not to sell the remaining Yeezy stock, the Herzogenaurach-based company said.

Net sales declined 1% in the first quarter, to 5.27 billion euros, and would have risen 9% with the Yeezy line, the company said. It reported a net loss of 24 million euros, a plunge from a profit of 310 million euros in the same period a year ago.

Operating profit, which excludes some items like taxes, was down to 60 million euros from 437 million euros a year earlier.

Gulden said the results for the Adidas were “a little better than we had expected” as the company seeks to restart growth and move beyond the breakup with Ye. He called 2023 “a year of transition” on the way to “a better ’24 and a good ’25.”

The company faces other problems tied to the rapper. Investors sued Adidas a week ago in the U.S., alleging the company knew about Ye's offensive remarks and harmful behavior years before the split and failed to take precautionary measures to limit financial losses.

The lawsuit — representing people who bought Adidas securities between May 3, 2018, and February 21, 2023 — pointed to 2018 comments where Ye suggested slavery was a “choice” and reports of Ye making antisemitic statements in front of Adidas staff.

The company said last week that it rejected “these unfounded claims and will take all necessary measures to vigorously defend ourselves against them.”

Ending the Ye partnership also cost Adidas 600 million euros in lost sales in the last three months of 2022, helping drive the company to a net loss of 513 million euros

An operating loss of 700 million euros is possible this year, Adidas said, mostly due to the 500 million-euro hit it would take if it doesn't sell the existing Yeezy shoes.





Shopify layoff comes as some say it's taking longer for people to find jobs

Shopify Inc.'s layoff this week will add a slew of new workers to the job-hunting pool at a time when experts say candidates are taking longer to find their next gig.

"The question is will they immediately find that (next job)? Maybe not," said Tricia Williams, director of research at the Future Skills Centre at Toronto Metropolitan University. 

"There might be some...transition disruptions as they sort out what their next move is."

The lengthy job hunt is being partially caused and exacerbated by a wave of layoffs that began last year and has continued in 2023 with companies as large as Google, Amazon and Meta cutting workers.

Many of the companies that made head count reductions attributed the moves to their leaders having misjudged demand for their products as people return to pre-pandemic habits.


However, the chief executive of Ottawa-based e-commerce software giant Shopify, said the Thursday staffing reduction he carried out was meant to refocus the company on its main mission and reduce distracting "side quests."

The company refused to give the number of staff that would be departing the company in its second layoff in the last year, but said it amounted to about 20 per cent of staff. 

A regulatory filing showed Shopify had 11,600 employees at the end of 2022. Twenty per cent of that amounts to about 2,300 people.

Despite the layoff, Williams said that tech workers are still in high demand in Canada, something April Hicke, co-founder of women's tech and hiring collective Toast, is also seeing.

However, both said the job market those laid off from the sector are facing has changed since before and even during the early stages of the pandemic.

While hiring is steady for engineer, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence roles, Hicke said sales, people and culture and product job are less in demand and more likely to be part of layoffs.

"While layoffs might generate headlines, probably the more substantial shift in the job market is really the hiring freezes that have happened at lots of places," said Brendon Bernard, senior economist at job posting site Indeed.

Software development postings on his company's website last spring were more than double their pre-pandemic level, but have "given all those gains back" and are slightly lower than they were in February 2020.

Those looking for jobs aren't being snatched up as quickly as they were at the pandemic's onset, when tech valuations skyrocketed.

"In Toronto, we're seeing about six months is how long it's taking people to find another thing, and more so in Calgary. I would say nine months-ish," Hicke said.

And many are taking a pay or title cut just to be employed again.

"We're seeing people who are definitely operating at a director level, taking manager positions because it's the only thing available," she said.

Whereas workers were jumping to roles that would pay them from $60,000 to $100,000 more at the height of the pandemic, Hicke now sees some taking 10 to 20 per cent pay cuts.

The average tech worker salary last year was $133,000, said Hired, an employment platform that compiles average annual salaries.

Its data based on 907,000 interviews across more than 47,750 active positions available between January 2019 and June 2022 in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. found almost 42 per cent of tech workers think employers have more power and doubt that will change in the near-term.

About 27 per cent felt jobseekers had more power but expected that to change in the near-term.

But Williams said, "I wouldn't quite say employers have the upper hand yet."

"We have both a labour shortage but also a skills shortage, so the people who are looking for work generally don't have the skills that are being asked for in the marketplace," she said.

"But I'm pretty confident that a lot of the Shopify workforce will have relevant skills for the broader labour market."

However, she said some laid-off workers might not find themselves in the traditional tech jobs or at the tech giants they are accustomed to working for.

That means tech workers could crop up in tech jobs in completely different sectors like agriculture, Williams said.

"They might not get a job specifically in tech, but tech is infiltrating every kind of economy."

For many companies who have long tried to lure over tech workers, the market's current conditions are a helping hand, Bernard pointed out.

"They might be finding it easier to find candidates just because there are other parts of the economy where demand for tech workers was so strong like a year ago and now has really come down to earth."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 5, 2023.

Review your rights before signing paperwork

during a layoff: Employment lawyers

You've just made it into the office, when your boss brings you into a meeting room, where you find someone from human resources about to deliver you bad news: your company is carrying out layoffs and you're on the list.

Your mind is swarming with thoughts - How will you pay the bills? When will you find your next job? What happens to all those vacation days you haven't used up? - when you're handed a letter outlining how much severance pay and other benefits your company is prepared to give you.

Should you sign the paperwork immediately? Not necessarily, say lawyers who have been approached in recent months by a wave of laid off employees eager to explore their rights and ensure they're getting the most they can from their former employers.

“The reason why you never want to sign right away is because that is your final kick at the can,” said Sunira Chaudhri, a partner at Workly Law in Toronto.

“Even if you have a legitimate claim to anything else from your employer, including vacation time or a bonus or the return of expenses, if you sign a release prior to sorting out all of those details, you cannot go back to your lawyer to seek any additional payments.”

Chaudhri urged people who lose their jobs to review their employer's obligations and compare them with what the company is offering before signing any paperwork.

“The moment you sign a release, your rights are gone,” she warned.

What workers are entitled to is often spelled out in a mix of federal and provincial laws, employment and collective agreements staff sign when hired or during union bargaining and those termination letters.

Unionized employees must turn to their collective agreement, which should outline what they are entitled to, said Lior Samfiru, a partner at Samfiru Tumarkin LLP in Toronto.

“There's really not much to negotiate,” he said. “The collective agreement says you get X, employers pays X and that's it.”

Figuring out what you're entitled to can be more complex for non-unionized workers, but Samfiru said it's worth looking into.

In more than 90 per cent of the cases his firm has handled where someone was let go, they've been owed more than what the company offered.

The first place non-unionized employees should look for information about their entitlements is their province's Employment Standards Act, which outlines the minimum rights employers have to provide during a layoff.

But almost every employee has greater entitlements than those minimums under common law, Samfiru said.

“The longer you work, the older you are and the more senior position you have, the more entitlements you have under common law,” he said.

And it's not just additional weeks or months of salary that companies may be on the hook for.

Benefits, bonuses, stock options and commissions may also have to be handed over to workers for a period of time beyond their last day, Samfiru said.

“Ask yourself, would I have received this if I continued working for the 12-month period? And if the answer is yes, I would have, then it has to be included as part of your severance.”

Another issue that often comes up during layoffs is non-compete clauses, which prevent workers from going to work for rivals during a set period of time following their termination.

Samfiru and Chaudhri agreed such clauses are unenforceable for all workers aside from those in the C-Suite, the highest echelons of a company.

But Samfiru warned some companies will try to enforce the clause anyway.

“If they're going to try to enforce it, they're going to sue you,” he said. “You might eventually win that lawsuit, but it's still going to be a very miserable experience, and it's going to cost you a lot of money, so it's not good advice to tell someone to just ignore the non-compete.”

When trying to figure out what clauses to abide by or what you can fight your company for, Samfiru and Chaudhri recommend laid off workers seek advice from a lawyer.

However, Chaudhri added it's important to consider the value and costs before taking action.

Some people will find legal expenses will outweigh any extra cash or perks they get from an employer. Others will learn their odds of making a successful argument aren't high.

Laid off workers should ask lawyers about both scenarios before taking action and prepare themselves for an outcome they might be disappointed in.

“I can't say that it's ever a slam dunk,” Chaudhri said. “There's always a risk.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 9, 2023.


Canada added 41,000 jobs in April, crushing estimates

Canadian employment grew more than expected for a fifth straight month, again defying expectations for a coming economic slowdown.

The country added 41,400 jobs in April, all in part-time work, while the unemployment rate held near a record low at 5 per cent, where it’s been since December, Statistics Canada reported Friday in Ottawa. The figures beat expectations for a gain of 20,000 positions and a jobless rate of 5.1 per cent, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey.

Bonds dropped. The 2-year Canada yield shot up about 8 basis points to 3.686 per cent at 8:40 a.m. Ottawa time.

After an unexpectedly strong start to the year, Canada’s jobs market is still showing momentum in the second quarter, with few signs of weakness in the wake of the Bank of Canada’s aggressive increases to interest rates. The gain adds to the more than 200,000 jobs filled or created during the first three months of 2023, a spike in employment many economists think accompanied a short rebound before growth stalls later this year.

Friday’s report follows gains of 21,800 and 34,700 in February and March, respectively, and marks the eighth consecutive month of job creation, bringing total employment gains since September to 423,900. That’s the longest uninterrupted streak of job gain since 2017.

Consistently hotter-than-expected job gains, coupled with sticky underlying price pressures, could bring the Bank of Canada off the sidelines, after officials held rates at 4.5 per cent for two straight meetings. This is the only jobs report between the central bank’s April 12 decision and its next one on June 7.

“We’re now over a year into the Bank of Canada’s rate hike cycle,” Brendon Bernard, an economist at Indeed Canada, said on BNN Bloomberg Television. “Overall, big picture, the rate hikes aren’t really showing up in these jobs numbers.”

During deliberations ahead of the last decision, policymakers considered raising borrowing costs, with stronger-than-expected growth and still-elevated core inflation cited as possible justifications. But officials opted to stand pat, in part because they expect both the labor market and consumer prices to cool in the months ahead.









Governor Tiff Macklem said Thursday that the jobs market remains tight and that wage growth needs to moderate in order to rein in inflation. While he reiterated a willingness to hike again if needed, he also said renewed global banking distress could alter the path of rates in Canada.

The persistent tightness of the labor market is adding pressure to workers’ compensation, with wages increasing more than 5 per cent for a third straight month. Policymakers have stressed that wage pressures of that magnitude aren’t consistent with getting inflation back to target unless matched by strong productivity growth, which has been declining.

In April, total hours worked rose 0.2 per cent on a monthly basis and were up 3.8 per cent compared to a year earlier. The participation rate held steady at 65.6 per cent.

Since February, monthly employment growth has averaged 33,000. The employment rate — the share of the population aged 15 and older who are employed — held steady at 62.4 per cent, as job gains kept up with the pace of growth in the labor force, which has been supported by high levels of immigration.

Job gains were led by increases in wholesale and retail trade, as well as transportation and warehousing. Employment rose in Ontario and Prince Edward Island, while it declined in Manitoba and was little change in other provinces.






'Persona non grata:' Canada expelling Chinese diplomat after threats to Tory MP

Minister of Foreign Affairs Mélanie Joly makes an address at the 2023 Liberal National Convention in Ottawa, on Thursday, May 4, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

The Liberal government is expelling Chinese diplomat Zhao Wei, whom Canada's spy agency alleged was involved in a plot to intimidate Conservative MP Michael Chong and his relatives in Hong Kong.

Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly says in a statement that Canada has declared the Toronto-based diplomat as persona non grata, over what she calls "foreign interference in our internal affairs."

Joly, who warned last week that Beijing would retaliate if Ottawa did expel diplomats, says the decision followed "careful consideration of all factors at play."

She says that "defending our democracy is of the utmost importance," after saying China could threaten the safety of Canadians and the prosperity of the country.

The federal government has confirmed a report in the Globe and Mail that CSIS had information in 2021 that the Chinese government was looking at ways to intimidate Chong and his relatives in Hong Kong over his criticism of Beijing's human-rights record.

China has insisted it does not interfere in other countries' internal affairs, but says it will respond to what it calls provocations.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 8, 2023.






Robot vs. human: Saskatoon brewer goes head to head with ChatGPT-designed beer

It may have been the greatest battle between robots and humans to ever take place inside a Saskatchewan brewery. 

The grain mash was masterful and the fermentation feisty as a brewer went head to head in a taste-off with ChatGPT to find out who, or what, can make the best beer. 

The idea for the faceoff against the artificial intelligence-powered chatbot came out of a meeting between staff at 9 Mile Legacy Brewing, a Saskatoon nanobrewery known for making craft beer and pushing boundaries. 

Garrett Pederson, 9 Mile’s co-founder and head brewer, said they were playing around with the explosively popular chatbot earlier this year and thought it would be fun to test the technology’s usefulness when it comes to one of the oldest drinks humans have produced.

“We will challenge it to make a recipe and I'll essentially make a recipe and we will see where that goes,” Pederson said. 

Luke Clark, an assistant brewer, became Team Robot and was tasked with asking ChatGPT to come up with a recipe. 

ChatGPT, developed by U.S.-based company OpenAI, uses written information already available on the internet to provide detailed responses to queries by users. It has received widespread attention for coming up with song lyrics, poems and scripts. 

Clark said he started by asking the chatbot to “make an award-winning gose recipe using local ingredients.” A gose is typically a sour and salty beer with origins in Germany.

The chatbot started spitting out recipes, Clark said, and they all predictably included Saskatoon berries.

What wasn’t so predictable was the alcohol content. Some would have resulted in a beer with 30 per cent alcohol content, others with two per cent.

While the ingredient quantities weren’t quite right, Clark said he was surprised to see all the things that would be needed were there.

"I had … to keep refining it until I got something I could actually use and tweaked it a little bit,” Clark said. 

Meanwhile, for Team Human, Pederson came up with his own recipe for a rhubarb ginger sour. He used the tried and true methods of researching old brew records and recipes, talking with other brewers and looking online. 

"It's always long, with a lot of time and research put into it,” he said.

Once the brewing itself was complete, it was time for the true test to see how humanity would fare against the machine. 

“You knew we’d never take the coming robopocalypse lying down” the brewery posted on social media announcing a blind taste test of the two beers to celebrate its eighth anniversary. 

People gathered in the taproom last Friday. There was no way for them to know which beer was from a human-developed recipe and which one came from a robot. They sipped, they tasted and then they voted.

"They ended up being quite different but both really, really good, actually," Pederson said. 

And while Team Human put in a good fight it was ultimately Team Robot that took the win with 60 per cent of the votes

Pederson said with a laugh that he suspects it was actually the malevolent artificial intelligence Skynet from the” Terminator” movie series that intervened. 

"We are going to do a Round 2,” he said. “Just keep playing until I win."

Despite the outcome, the brewers don’t see the artificial intelligence taking over any time soon. 

While it was interesting to see the chatbot gather information quickly from around the internet to understand the basics of the brew, it still required quite a lot of human intervention to make it something they could sell. 

"I was just surprised it was drinkable beer at the end of the day,” Clark said. 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 5, 2023.

SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC CANADA

Public long-term care insurance would be 'financial lifeline' for older Canadians: Report

A new report from a Toronto Metropolitan University think tank has proposed that public insurance for long-term care services could be a “financial lifeline” for Canada’s aging population.

Researchers at the National Institute on Ageing looked at six jurisdictions with established public long-term care insurance programs, and considered how the model could be applied in a Canadian context.

Their paper, published Thursday, said a potential insurance program would likely require some contributions from Canadians through wages or taxation, similar to how the Canada Pension Plan and national health insurance program are funded. In return, people would receive a guaranteed level of financial coverage and long-term care, including home care and long-term care home services.

The report noted that nationalized long-term care insurance wouldn’t lower the overall costs of long-term care, but it would ensure older Canadians have access to basic coverage for their future care needs.

“Establishing a national LTC insurance program could present a unique opportunity to re-imagine Canada’s social contract and better align its provision of LTC services to the needs and preferences of older Canadians,” Dr. Samir Sinha, director of health policy research for the institute, said in a news release.

COSTS OF LONG-TERM CARE

He noted that the level of public funding currently available has not met Canadian’s long-term care needs, and the paper highlighted the financial burden long-term care can place on households.

In-home services can cost up to $3,500 per month, and 24-hour support can reach $25,000 per month, the report said. The report added that those prices tags can be “crippling” for older adults, who now live about 22 years past the age of 65.

The report also explained that private insurance for long-term care is currently available in Canada but at high premiums, making it difficult to attract customers.

Washington State, the first U.S. jurisdiction to establish a public long-term care program, did so in part because its population was aging, but few residents were able to afford services, the report said. That program is set to start collecting premiums this year and make benefits available in 2026.

AGING POPULATION

Germany and Japan, two of the countries studied in the report, implemented long-term care insurance programs when they had similar demographic pictures to Canada’s, where about 19 per cent of the population is now aged 65 or older.

Those countries brought in their programs to help alleviate the financial burden of paying for long-term care, while other countries like the Netherlands and South Korea began their programs earlier in their demographic transitions.

The report said Canada would need to consider its objectives for a long-term care insurance program, as many older adults want to age in their homes, and wait lists for long-term care homes already stretch into the tens of thousands.

POTENTIAL CARE IMPROVEMENTS

Thousands of Canadian seniors died in long-term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the crisis highlighted the need for improved living and care standards in the facilities.

The report said public long-term care insurance might serve to improve the quality of care people receive, as well as see improvements in governance and resource allocation, because the program would have to set definitions for the services and standards people are entitled to.

It could also “greatly reduce fragmentation and lead to more equitable service coverage and financial protection,” the report said.

FUNDING

The case studies researchers looked at funded their programs through social insurance contributions or taxation, as well as some premiums collected at the point of service. There were also some contributions from employers, insurance programs and various levels of government.

Taiwan was the only jurisdiction that funded its program primarily through revenue from taxation on items like tobacco, and along with South Korea, that country exempts lower-income and high-risk people from paying premiums on services.

SUGGESTED IMPLEMENTATION

The researchers laid out several suggestions for how Canada could implement a long-term care insurance program, first by establishing an individual’s contributions and the benefits they would receive later on.

Canada’s existing network of long-term care providers could be leveraged to set up the program, they said, and “care managers” working at local levels could ensure people’s specific needs are being met.

The paper recommended social contributions as a primary funding mechanism, and suggested that the program could be used as an opportunity to reallocate funding towards home and community care options, as well as establish standards for care.


Will Canada need to raise its retirement

age? Here's what economists say

Amid widespread protests in France over its government's plan to increase the age of retirement, one economist said it is unlikely that Canada will need to increase its retirement age.

While aging demographics present a challenge to businesses in Canada, the potential impact has been softened by immigration and people electing to work at increasingly advanced ages, James Orlando, the director of TD Economics, said in an interview with BNNBloomberg.ca last Thursday. 

“The fact that we have so many people coming in, we've done such a good job of attracting immigration, [that] has enabled us to be able to afford the supports to the older population of Canada,” Orlando said.

Additionally, there has been a substantial increase in people aged 60-70 years old choosing to work longer, due partly to changing incentives, he said.

“The fact that we've done things like eliminating the mandatory retirement age in certain provinces, the fact that we have a system in place where we've incentivized people to delay receiving things like Canadian Pension Plan benefits or even delaying Old Age Security benefits, that incentivizes people to not draw on [those benefits] but also work longer,” Orlando said. 

If these changes were not made, the federal government would have to allocate more money to support people that likely would have retired earlier, he said. 

As people live longer, Bill VanGorder, the chief operating officer and chief policy officer of Canadian Association of Retired Persons (CARP), said in a phone interview with BNNBloomberg.ca on Friday that people are not automatically choosing to retire when they reach the age of 65.

“And they shouldn't be forced to [retire at 65] in fact, we need them to keep working, because there's a lack of employees right across the country,” VanGorder said.

Canada’s 2023 federal budget included a 10 per cent increase in Old Age Security (OAS) payments. 

VanGorder said that the 10 per cent increase was expected and that the budget had “very little in it for seniors” and was “very disappointing.”

The increase will be accessible to people over the age of 75, which is something VanGorder said he finds concerning.

“Once again, they're making a two-tiered system for old age people. People between [age] 65 and 75 are not eligible for it,” he said.

“Our feedback that we're getting from our members and other older Canadians across the country is that the pressures of the increased cost of living these days are actually hitting the younger people, age 65 to 75, more than the older group [age of 75 and older].”

VanGorder said the people in the younger age group are generally more active, while the older group often live more sedentary lives.

In the 2012 federal budget, then prime minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government planned to increase the minimum age to receive OAS support from 65 to 67 starting in 2023. 

In the 2016 budget, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberals reversed that decision.  

Civil unrest began in France after President Emmanuel Macron moved to raise the minimum retirement age to 64 from 62 to bring the nation’s retirement age in line with other European countries. The two-year increase to the minimum retirement age is a necessary move, according to Macron, in order to address the country’s aging population and debt. 

FUNDING RETIREMENT 

Lisa Raitt, co-chair of Coalition for a Better Future, vice-chair of global investment banking at CIBC Capital Markets and former natural resources minister, said in an interview on March 29, that OAS payments and government-guaranteed income will cost about $60 billion this year. 

By 2027, Raitt said OAS costs will rise by around 50 per cent to $90 billion. She said there is not a “special trust” that currently exists to meet rising OAS costs and that funding will come from taxation. 

As Canadians age, Raitt said long-term care will become a significant issue that requires more attention. Germany and parts of the U.S. fund long-term care through a “payroll type tax,” she said, which is not something she advocates for. 

“It's just recognizing, we're going to have to have a separate fund to pay for that, and it can't always compete with people who want to have more money for the provision of services within a hospital,” Raitt said.

Orlando said the federal government will likely be able to continue to fund existing programs long-term, including retirement, as long as doing so doesn’t impact the federal government's fiscal anchor, the debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio. 

“For as long as debt to GDP is not increasing on an unsustainable path, then the ability for the government to be able to keep funding the programs they have in place is there,” he said. 

“So you're not having a day of reckoning where you have to make significant changes to your policy system for so long as you're able to make these ratios improve over time.” 

Wildfires in Alberta force evacuations, cut oil, gas output

Wildfires burning across the Canadian province of Alberta have prompted the evacuation of almost 30,000 residents and the shutdown of oil and natural gas wells and pipeline systems. At least 145,000 barrels per day of oil production has been halted.

A total of 109 blazes were burning as of late Sunday, 30 of which were classified as out of control, and a provincial state of emergency has been declared. Evacuation orders have been issued for communities, including some less than 100 kilometres west of the provincial capital, Edmonton. 

The fires are affecting energy production in the region, which accounts for most of Canada’s hydrocarbon exports. Crescent Point Energy Corp. has shut in 45,000 barrels a day of production in the Kaybob Duvernay region, though the company said it has seen no damage to its assets. Vermilion Energy Inc. temporarily shut 30,000 barrels a day of production, but added in a statement that initial assessments indicate minimal damage to key infrastructure. 

Around 20,000 barrels a day of Pipestone Energy Corp.’s production has been shut in, the company said in a statement. Meanwhile, Tourmaline Oil has closed down nine South and West Deep Basin gas processing facilities as nearby fires expanded and new wildfires rapidly emerged.

One community under evacuation order as of Sunday was Fox Creek, a major center for light oil and gas drillers. Energy facilities were also being evacuated in Grande Prairie along with local residents, provincial officials said

Unlike the massive wildfires of 2016, which were concentrated in the northeast of Alberta and forced the shutdown of more than 1 million barrels a day of oil sands production, the worst-hit areas this year are in the province’s west. There, explorers drill into rock formations including the Clearwater, Montney and Duvernay. The area includes gas processing plants and is crisscrossed by pipelines.

Paramount Resources Ltd. has shut about 50,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day of production as of May 5 as a precaution and because of disruptions to third-party infrastructure, the company said Sunday. Its operations in the Grande Prairie and Kaybob regions are being affected. 

Pipeline operator TC Energy Corp. halted two compressor stations on its Nova Gas system nearest to active wildfires, the company said in an email Sunday. Other sections of the system and other networks continue to operate safely. The company is keeping workers away from facilities near active blazes unless necessary.

Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure Ltd. shut its Brazeau River Complex, a gas processing facility, west of Edmonton and evacuated all personnel, the company said in an email. Cenovus Energy Inc. has shut down some production and halted plants in some areas, a company spokesperson said. 

The government-owned Trans Mountain Pipeline, the sole link carrying Canadian crude to the Pacific coast, is still in operation but the company has deployed mitigation measures, including a perimeter sprinkler system at its Edson pump station, and is ready to deploy additional protection measures if needed, the company said. 

Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. had to shut in less than 300 barrels a day of production after the gas processing plants operated by Tidewater and another run by Keyera Corp. went out of operation due to the blazes, Chief Executive Officer Brian Schmidt said by phone. Pembina Pipeline Corp. also said it evacuated some workers west of Edmonton.

Meta may end Facebook, Instagram news content in Canada over act


Meta Platforms Inc. said it would end news content on Facebook and Instagram in Canada if lawmakers pass legislation to force social-networking platforms to pay media publishers to feature their work. 

“We’ve taken the difficult decision that if this flawed legislation is passed, we will have to end the availability of news content on Facebook and Instagram in Canada,” Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, said in a statement on Monday. 

Clegg described Canada’s proposed Online News Act as “fundamentally flawed,” saying Canada would become the “first democracy to put a price on free links to web pages, which flies in the face of global norms.” 

The former U.K. deputy prime minister had been scheduled to speak about the bill at a committee of Canada’s House of Commons on Monday. But he canceled after the title of the session was changed to, “Tech Giants’ Current and Ongoing Use of Intimidation and Subversion Tactics to Evade Regulation in Canada and Across the World.”

Canada’s act, known as Bill C-18, was proposed to establish a “fair revenue sharing” system between digital platforms and news outlets and provide for collective bargaining by media in negotiating fees with companies like Meta. In introducing the legislation last year, Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez said he was seeking to address a “market imbalance” as an increasing number of Canadians turn to digital platforms for news. 

Canada is certainly not the first country that Meta has warned on the prospect of pulling its content. The company had said last year that it would remove Facebook and Instagram from Europe altogether over European Union data regulations.  AND AUSTRALIA



Mr. Putin, criminalizing journalism to make us silent doesn’t works

It is obvious that Putin doesn’t fear NATO, what he fears is free journalism.

Read in Russian | Читать по-русски


Thomas Nilsen is editor of the Barents Observer. 
Photo: Atle Staalesen

By Thomas Nilsen
 Barents Observer
April 23, 2023

Opinion Editorial:

 It was up north President Vladimir Putin got his first real lesson on ‘the danger’ of free media. Killing 118 crew members, the August 2000 sinking of the Kursk submarine in the Barents Sea paralyzed the newly minted leader. His desultory response to the failed rescue operation was broadcasted worldwide. First more than a week after the catastrophe, a scared Putin aborted his vacation on the Black Sea and traveled north to meet the bereaved family members who were packed in the town hall of Vidyayevo, the closed military town less than 80 kilometers from Russia’s border with Norway. The relatives were angry but got few answers on why their authorities refused rescue help from the neighboring country in the west.

Channel One (ORT) - at the time owned by Boris Berezovsky - voiced unprecedented criticism against Putin for his failed leadership at a time of national tragedy. Slamming the President’s mishandled response also came from NTV, Echo Moskva, and Segondnya, all part of media tycoon Vladimir Gusinsky’s holding company.

Instead of denouncing the Northern Fleet’s cover-ups, lies, and contradictory information about the Kursk drama, Mr. Putin chose to blame the messengers, the media. He said TV had reporters unscrupulously trying to destroy the state, discrediting the country.

It didn’t help. Putin’s popularity hit record low in the months that followed the submarine disaster. Lessons learned: To control public opinions, the Kremlin needs to control the media. Especially if you plan to build a vertical power structure in a Federation where Boris Yeltsin for a decade had distributed powers to the regions.

In late 2000, Putin sent the Prosecutor General’s Office after Berezovsky who fled the country and later died in London. Channel One came under state control. So did the NTV, the popular TV channel that previously had hinted that FSB was behind a failed apartment-building bombing in Ryazan shortly after Vladimir Putin moved from his office in Lubyanka to become Prime Minister under Boris Yeltsin in August 1999. NTV was taken over by Gazprom-Media and the end came to its sharp analysis of current events.

One of NTV’s most prominent journalists that left NTV in protest of the takeover in early 2001 was Vladimir Kara-Murza Sr. His son is Vladimir Kara-Murza, the civil society promoter - and journalist - who last week was sentenced to 25 years by a Moscow court for telling the truth about war crimes conducted by the Russian Army in Ukraine.

His so-called treason sentence for refusing to be silenced is adding to the Kremlin’s brutal crackdown against freedom of expression we have seen since Russia’s all-out war on Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

Vladimir Putin and his war crime compatriots know perfectly well that domestic support for the military attack on Ukraine would not be possible if free journalism existed. Independent media would easily debug Putin’s increasingly paranoid worldview that now is sending tens and tens of thousands of young Russian men to their deaths as cannon fodder.

It’s not complicated. The war on Ukraine was not caused by any alleged Nazis in Kyiv, Russian history justifications, or North Atlantic Treaty Organization expansion like the narrative peddled by Moscow brings on. The order to invade was given by one crazy man living in isolation and his fellow regime supporters that need the war to stay in power.

A few days after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the regime speeded up adoption of repressive legislation hitting on media. Criminalizing independent journalism by introducing laws on ´discrediting´ the army and ´fake-news´ have caused charges for dozens of Russian media people. Among them are journalists Valery Badmayev, Ilya Krasilshchik, and Maria Ponomarenko, editor Mikhail Afanasyev, publisher Sergey Mikhaylov, and TV producer Marina Ovsyannikova. To name a few.

It is obvious that Putin doesn’t fear NATO, what he fears is free journalism.


Arkhangelsk student Olesya Krivtsova understands this. The young woman is on Russia’s most wanted list after she in March cut her electronic tracking bracelet and left the country for Vilnius. She was then under house arrest awaiting a trial that could give her up to 15 years in jail for sharing an anti-war post on social media. Olesya now says she wants to pursue a career in journalism.

She is most welcome to the Barents Observer. Located a 15-minute drive from Norway’s border with Russia in the north, we are currently expanding our newsroom for exile Russian journalists.

We are cooperating with UiT The Arctic University of Tromsø with an aim to contribute both to freedom of expression and to preserve Norwegian-Russian know-how in the high north with the help of Russians that have left the country for now. Academic independence for researchers in exile is equally important.

This is one contribution to the future history of a Russia derailing the current path to totalitarianism.

The Barents Observer - publishing in both Russian and English - was founded as a private initiative more than 20 years ago to bring increased understanding across borders between the Nordic north and regions in northwest Russia.

All of us that have worked as journalists inside Russia - reporting about lovely people and the challenges they have faced in post-Soviet times - have also been cleareyed about the risk the country’s dark shadows have posed to freedom of writing.

When Dmitry Medvedev came as Prime Minister to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Barents Cooperation here in Kirkenes in 2013, his security staff requested the Norwegian organizers to remove a handful of journalists from the list to be accreditated. Those were our colleagues from regional media in Murmansk and Arkhangelsk, journalists invited by the Barents Observer. Moscow wanted full control of what was reported from the north, a region branded as High North - Low Tensions.

Norway opened the door for the north Russian journalists, and when the Kremlin’s press pool packed up their cameras, Medvedev did his best to answer questions by Murmansk reporters about why prices on cod were lower on this side of the border than at home. A few hours later could all reporters take photos of a smiling Medvedev walking side-by-side with Jens Stoltenberg across the Norwegian-Russian border. This was a short year before the illegal annexation of Crimea and Stoltenberg was Prime Minister.

Medvedev and Stoltenberg walked the Storskog-Borisoglebsk border checkpoints in June 2013. Photo: Thomas Nilsen

In 2014, the FSB asked Norwegian authorities to bring our reporting to silence. Although a few regional politicians in northern Norway made a failed attempt to remove our editorial freedom, the Barents Observer only strengthened its belief in the importance of continuing what we are best at: Accurate, unbiased, fact-based reporting.


Independent journalism is the best tool to counter propaganda and lies. Our desire to defend this principle gets stronger with every repressive step taken by Moscow. Journalism is not a crime.

When Roskomnadzor - the Russian censorship agency - in 2019 blocked the Barents Observer we got many more readers. Logically, the attention brought by being blocked is considered a quality stamp among Russians reading the internet for truthful information. Tools to circumnavigate the Kremlin’s censorship wall are many and you can today find Barents Observer on Telegram, YouTube, podcasts, mirror domains, or simply as millions of others inside Russia: go online with VPN.

All we are doing is backed by the Russian Consitution. Article 29 is as clear as it can be:

The freedom of mass communication shall be guaranteed. Censorship shall be banned.


The Constitution, or any other rule-of-law principles for that matter, doesn’t worry Mr. Putin. He considers himself to be the law.

In a vertical power structure, lawmakers (the State Duma), law enforcement agencies, and the Justice Ministry all jump when the ruler in the bunker makes clear that journalists doing their job are enemies of the State.

With the wrongful detention and made-up espionage charges against Wall Street Journal journalist and American citizen Evan Gershkovich, Putin has hit a new low in his war on journalism. Under the definition of espionage, anyone using publicly available information can be prosecuted. Last year, journalist Ivan Safronov was sentenced to 22 years in jail. Gershkovich, however, is the first foreign journalist to become a victim under the law.

Who’s next, you wonder?

Well, several of the few remaining accredited foreign correspondents in Moscow decided not to find out and have already left the country.

Creating an atmosphere of fear is on top of FSB’s toolbox. Last week, the State Duma approved in its second reading amendments to the law on Treason in the Criminal Code. From now, any citizen can get life sentence for giving information to foreigners. Who now dares to give an interview to a journalist from Norway, or any other country?

The law amendments came the same day as the Prosecutor General’s Office labeled Norway-based environmental group Bellona as an ‘undesirable organization.’ The NGO has since the start of cross-border cooperation up north in the early 1990ties actively worked internationally to help Russia secure its Arctic nuclear waste dumps. From now, anyone providing information - or cooperating - with Bellona risks criminal charges with up to six years in jail.

In a similar wave of attempts to stop the free flow of information, the regime intensifies its crackdown on Russian exile journalists. The Barents Observer’s reporter Georgii Chentemirov was recently included in the Justice Ministry’s list of so-called ‘foreign agents’.

The ‘foreign agents’ laws have since 2012 been used by Russian authorities to smear opposition groups, media, and individuals who have expressed opinions challenging the narrative of the Kremlin. This Friday, Natalia Severts-Yermolina was included in the list. Working out of Petrozavodsk, she has for years had a goal to improve cooperation between Russian journalists up north with colleagues in the Nordic countries.

That work is more challenging than ever.

Meanwhile, the Barents Observer can only promise one thing. We continue cross-border independent reporting. Being silenced is not an alternative.