Friday, September 22, 2023

Biden uses executive power to create a New Deal-style American Climate Corps

MATTHEW DALY
Wed, September 20, 2023 




 Climate activists rally in front of the White House at Lafayette Square to demand that President Joe Biden declare a climate emergency and move the country rapidly away from fossil fuels, July 4, 2023, in Washington. After being thwarted by Congress, Biden will use his executive authority to create a New Deal-style American Climate Corps that will serve as a major green jobs training program. 
(AP Photo/Yuri Gripas, File)


WASHINGTON (AP) — After being thwarted by Congress, President Joe Biden will use his executive authority to create a New Deal-style American Climate Corps that will serve as a major green jobs training program.

In an announcement Wednesday, the White House said the program will employ more than 20,000 young adults who will build trails, plant trees, help install solar panels and do other work to boost conservation and help prevent catastrophic wildfires.

The climate corps had been proposed in early versions of the sweeping climate law approved last year but was jettisoned amid strong opposition from Republicans and concerns about cost.

Democrats and environmental advocacy groups never gave up on the plan and pushed Biden in recent weeks to issue an executive order authorizing what the White House now calls the American Climate Corps.

“After years of demonstrating and fighting for a Climate Corps, we turned a generational rallying cry into a real jobs program that will put a new generation to work stopping the climate crisis,'' said Varshini Prakash, executive director of the Sunrise Movement, an environmental group that has led the push for a climate corps.

With the new corps “and the historic climate investments won by our broader movement, the path towards a Green New Deal is beginning to become visible,'' Prakash said, referring to a comprehensive jobs-and-climate plan supported by many activists and some Democrats but ridiculed by Republicans as a socialist nightmare that would raise taxes and hamper the economy.

Prakash, a frequent Biden critic, participated in a White House call on Tuesday promoting the new job corps, which comes as Biden tries to strengthen his appeal to young voters in the 2024 presidential campaign.

The Sunrise Movement and other climate activists, including many young adults, were outraged this spring after Biden approved the huge Willow oil-drilling project in Alaska. Opponents say the project and others approved by Biden put his climate legacy at risk and are a breach of his 2020 campaign promise to stop new oil drilling on federal lands.

Those concerns were put aside, for now, as environmental activists hailed the new jobs program, which is modeled after the Civilian Conservation Corps, created in the 1930s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat, as part of the New Deal.

“Young people nationwide are excited to see the launch of the American Climate Corps, enhancing career pathways in clean energy, conservation and climate resilience,'' said Cristina Tzintzún Ramirez, president of NextGen America, an organization that promotes education, registration and mobilization for voters age 18 to 35.

"Young people are fighting for climate justice every day in their community, and now they have even more opportunity to continue this fight in their careers,'' Ramirez said.

More than 50 Democratic lawmakers, including Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, had also encouraged Biden to create a climate corps, saying in a letter on Monday that “the climate crisis demands a whole-of-government response at an unprecedented scale.''

The lawmakers cited deadly heat waves in the Southwest and across the nation, as well as dangerous floods in New England and devastating wildfires on the Hawaiian island of Maui, among recent examples of climate-related disasters.

Democrats called creation of the climate corps “historic” and a key step toward fulfilling the vision of the Green New Deal.

“Today President Biden listened to the (environmental) movement, and he delivered with an American Climate Corps,'' a beaming Markey said at a celebratory news conference outside the Capitol.

"We are starting to turn the green dream into a green reality,'' added Ocasio-Cortez, who co-sponsored the Green New Deal legislation with Markey four years ago.

"You all are changing the world,'' she told young activists.

The White House declined to say how much the program will cost or how it will be paid for, but Markey and other Democrats said money from the climate law and the 2021 infrastructure law would serve as a “down payment” for thousands of jobs.

Republicans have largely dismissed the climate corps as a do-gooder proposal that would waste money and could even take jobs away from other workers displaced by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We don’t need another FDR program, and the idea that this is going to help land management is a false idea as well,” Arkansas Rep. Bruce Westerman, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, said in 2021.

Rep. Joe Neguse, a Colorado Democrat, said the program should pay “a living wage" while offering health care coverage and other benefits.

A key distinction between the original Civilian Conservation Corps and the new climate contingent is that, unlike the 1930s, the U.S. economy is not in an economic depression. The U.S. unemployment rate was 3.8% in August, low by historical measures.

The new corps is also likely to be far more diverse than the largely white and male force created 90 years ago.

White House climate adviser Ali Zaidi said the administration will work with at least six federal agencies to create the climate corps and will pair with at least 10 states. California, Colorado, Maine, Michigan and Washington have already begun similar programs, while five more are launching their own climate corps, Zaidi said: Arizona, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina and Utah.

The initiative will provide job training and service opportunities to work on a wide range of projects, including restoring coastal wetlands to protect communities from storm surges and flooding; clean energy projects such as wind and solar power; managing forests to prevent catastrophic wildfires; and energy efficient solutions to cut energy bills for consumers, the White House said.

Creation of the climate corps comes as the Environmental Protection Agency launches a $4.6 billion grant competition for states, municipalities and tribes to cut climate pollution and advance environmental justice. The Climate Pollution Reduction Grants are funded by the 2022 climate law and are intended to drive community-driven solutions to slow climate change.

EPA Administrator Michael Regan said the grants will help "communities so they can chart their own paths toward the clean energy future.”

The deadline for states and municipalities to apply is April 1, with grants expected in late 2024. Tribes and territories must apply by May 1, with grants expected by early 2025.


Biden to launch 'American Climate Corps' following calls from activists, Democratic lawmakers

BEN GITTLESON and MORGAN WINSOR
Wed, September 20, 2023 


President Joe Biden on Wednesday will launch the "American Climate Corps," according to the White House, which described it as "a workforce training and service initiative" for more than 20,000 Americans "that will ensure more young people have access to the skills-based training necessary for good-paying careers in the clean energy and climate resilience economy."

Biden had endorsed a similar idea of a "Civilian Climate Corps" while running for president in the 2021 election. But the initiative was ultimately left out of the pared down version of Biden's "Build Back Better" bill that became the Inflation Reduction Act.

Dozens of climate activists and Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly called on Biden to create a federally funded jobs program that would carry out climate and conservation projects. They have implored him to use his executive powers as president to establish the initiative on his own, which is what he's doing now.

Wednesday's announcement comes amid the annual Climate Week that coincides with the yearly United Nations General Assembly in New York City.

While Biden spoke about the importance of tackling climate change in his address to the 78th Session of the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday, he notably will not attend a gathering on Wednesday hosted by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres that will reportedly focus on new action countries are taking to fight climate change. U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry will attend in Biden's stead.

"The American Climate Corps, just in its first year of recruitment, will put to work a new, diverse generation of more than 20,000 Americans doing the important tasks of conserving and restoring our lands and waters, bolstering community resilience, deploying clean energy -- in many cases, distributed and community based -- implementing energy efficiency technologies that will cut consumer costs for the American people, and advancing environmental justice so long overdue in so many places," Biden's national climate adviser, Ali Zaidi, told reporters during a telephone call on Monday.

A major part of the initiative, according to Zaidi, will be teaming up with apprenticeship and pre-apprenticeship programs across the country and pushing more Americans from diverse backgrounds into these programs -- ultimately resulting in well-paying jobs for them, thanks to funding from Biden's climate legislation.

Americans will be able to sign up online for the American Climate Corps, which the White House said will train young people in clean energy, conservation and climate resilience related skills. There will be a focus on climate justice, too, with an emphasis on helping underserved communities, according to the White House.

The Biden administration will coordinate recruitment for the American Climate Corps across the federal government and streamline pathways from the initiative and related programs into employment in the broader federal civil service, the White House said.

abcnews.go.com

Biden launches 'climate corps' for green jobs

AFP
Wed, September 20, 2023 at 8:38 AM MDT·2 min read

US President Joe Biden, pictured in Arizona in August 2023, has made the clean energy transition a key plank of his 2024 reelection bid (Jim WATSON)


US President Joe Biden launched a new "Climate Corps" on Wednesday to help young people get green jobs, as he tries to sell voters on his plans for a clean energy economy.

"Today, we are mobilizing the next generation of clean energy, conservation, and climate resilience workers," Biden said on X, formerly Twitter.

Biden added that the scheme would train over 20,000 young people to get "good-paying jobs" after they complete their paid training.

The US president has made the economy a key plank of his bid for reelection in 2024, particularly through his signature Inflation Reduction Act.

The ambitious climate law aims to speed the US transition to clean energy, rebuild US industry and boost social justice.

Biden, who is in New York for the UN General Assembly, warned the world body yesterday that the climate crisis poses an existential threat to "all of humanity."

US climate activists, who have long called for the initiative, gave it a mixed reception.

One group, Evergreen, said it was a "big step toward delivering good jobs for young people in the booming clean energy economy."

But Keanu Arpels-Josiah, an organizer of an anti-fossil fuels march in New York last Sunday, said it was "not enough."

The Climate Corps' name has echoes of the US Peace Corps which has sent volunteers around the world for decades.

US media said however that it was more closely modelled on a scheme during President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "New Deal" to get America out of the Great Depression in the 1930s.

The Civilian Conservation Corps set around a quarter of a million unemployed young men to work on a huge program of projects like reforestation and dam-building.

dk/bfm

Civilian Climate Corps Launched by White House During Climate Week

Lexi McMenamin
TEEN VOGUE
Wed, September 20, 2023


A year after the concept of a "Civilian Climate Corps" was scrapped in the negotiation over the Inflation Reduction Act, President Joe Biden announced the formation of the American Climate Corps, a first-of-its-kind jobs program “to train young people in high-demand skills for jobs in the clean energy economy,” per the White House’s new website to sign up for more information. The American Climate Corps will create a projected 20,000 jobs for young people in its first year.

Modeled on an FDR/New Deal-era program (nearly a century ago), Biden has long floated the policy, signing an executive order in his first days in office for agencies to begin brainstorming about such a program. Per NPR, the resulting program is smaller than previously proposed iterations. According to the Washington Post, participants will be paid, but specifics on compensation were not shared. NPR also reported that most positions will not require prior experience.

Eight states have similar programs underway, and the White House said in its announcement that five more states – Arizona, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina and Utah – will also launch programs.

The current concept came out of the work of the Sunrise Movement and other climate activists who have agitated the past two administrations over the last five years to take serious action on the climate crisis.

In spring 2021, Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) — the original sponsors of the Green New Deal in Congress — introduced a bill that would have created a Civilian Climate Corps. This past Monday, Markey and Ocasio-Cortez sent a letter to the Biden administration asking that the program be implemented via executive order, as House Republicans are unlikely to pass the bill; the letter was signed by 51 members of Congress.

The announcement comes amid several days of climate protests in New York City timed to a United Nations climate summit during its general assembly. Biden faced condemnation from protesters for not attending the summit, as well as for what they consider to be inadequate urgency and progress in combating climate change.

Sunrise is celebrating the newly announced program, with executive director Varshini Prakash saying in a statement, “We turned a generational rallying cry into a real jobs program that will put a new generation to work stopping the climate crisis.”

But others have been less impressed. Keanu Arpels-Josiah, a member of Fridays for Future NYC and an organizer behind Sunday’s March to End Fossil Fuels, warned in a statement that the program, while important, is simply not enough to address the greater problem: “A Climate Corps that focuses solely on promoting renewables doesn't do the job. It won’t undo the Biden administration’s damage in approving climate bombs like [the Willow Project],” Arpels-Josiah said. “It won’t end new fossil fuel projects and phase out existing projects in the timeline we need for our generation to survive.”

Teen Vogue 

Biden administration launches first-of-its-kind American Climate Corps program

Ella Nilsen and Donald Judd, 
CNN
Wed, September 20, 2023 

President Joe Biden’s administration is launching the first-ever American Climate Corps Wednesday, the White House said, a workforce training and service initiative aimed at preparing American youth for jobs in clean energy and climate resilience.

“The American Climate Corps, just in its first year of recruitment, will put to work a new diverse generation of more than 20,000 Americans doing the important task of conserving and restoring our lands and waters, bolstering community resilience, deploying clean energy – in many cases, distributed and community based – implementing energy efficiency technologies that will cut consumer costs for the American people, and advancing environmental justice so long overdue in so many places,” White House national climate adviser Ali Zaidi told reporters on a call previewing the announcement Tuesday.

The new corps will support a wide range of jobs, including restoring coastal wetlands, forest management to help fight wildfires, and building out clean energy projects.

Creating a Civilian Climate Corps has long been an ask of youth climate groups, including the Sunrise Movement.

The corps was an idea first introduced as part of “unity” campaign task forces between Biden’s 2020 campaign and representatives of former Democratic presidential contender and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders – task forces that had a big hand in crafting policy Biden ultimately implemented as president.

Sunrise co-founder Varshini Prakash and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, were members of the climate task force, as well as Biden’s first White House climate adviser Gina McCarthy and current US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry.

“A lot of the impetus and inspiration came from early proposals Sunrise shared on the Bernie/Biden task force,” Prakash told CNN in an interview Tuesday.

But the road to making the corps a reality was long and fraught. Initially proposed as part of Biden’s Build Back Better agenda and bill, the program was stripped out of the Inflation Reduction Act, crafted by Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Prakash told CNN the idea then moved to the White House to be implemented.

RELATED: Biden’s climate law has led to 86,000 new jobs and $132 billion in investment, new report says

Prakash said the new corps is an important part of Biden’s reelection argument to young people, but added much more needs to be done to cut fossil fuel use and combat the impacts of the climate crisis.

“I think this represents a significant step forward,” Prakash said. “Young people need to see actions like this and more of it in the leadup to the 2024 election. There’s more to be done on the climate crisis.”


Boys at work at a Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) camp at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Maryland, circa 1935. The CCC was a public work relief program for unemployed men, providing vocational training through the performance of useful work related to conservation and development of natural resources in the US from 1933 to 1942. - Fotosearch/Getty ImagesMore

Five states – California, Colorado, Maine, Michigan and Washington – have already launched successful Climate Corps programs, with an additional five – Arizona, Utah, Minnesota, North Carolina and Maryland – announcing their own state programs Wednesday, Zaidi said.

Six agencies – the Department of Labor, Department of the Interior, Department of Agriculture, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Energy and AmeriCorps – will sign a memorandum of understanding establishing the new program, with AmeriCorps standing up a new “American Climate Corps hub” to support the initiative, building on investments from the bipartisan infrastructure law and the Inflation Reduction Act aimed at climate resilience and conservation, an official told reporters Tuesday.

Signups for the new program launch Wednesday at whitehouse.gov/climatecorps, while the recruitment cycle will follow over the coming year, the official added.



NC launches Climate Action Corps same day as Biden announces national effort
Adam Wagner

Wed, September 20, 2023 
newsobserver.com

Travis Long/tlong@newsobserver.com

North Carolina on Wednesday launched its Climate Action Corps, a new service effort that will station 25 people across the state to work on projects intended to boost resiliency against climate-fueled disasters

The N.C. Climate Action Corps will collaborate with the American Climate Corps, which President Joe Biden announced Wednesday. Both announcements come amid Climate Week.

An announcement from Gov. Roy Cooper’s office listed a number of projects on which Climate Action Corps members could serve. Those include planting trees to address urban heat islands, helping build living shorelines to protect communities against storm surge, and building community gardens, among other projects.

“In North Carolina, we have prioritized the transition to clean energy and this expansion will bolster our efforts. This project will strengthen our clean energy workforce as we continue to lead the way toward a clean energy future,” Cooper said in a written statement.

The N.C. Corps will operate through the N.C. Commission on Volunteerism and Community Service. It is being launched in partnership with California Volunteers, a California government program that is aiming to turn its climate corps into a national effort.

North Carolina was one of five states that launched a climate corps on Wednesday, coinciding with Biden’s announcement. The others were Arizona, Maryland, Minnesota and Utah.

With the announcement, North Carolina became one of 10 states with a climate corps.

Service members will work in communities that do not have existing AmeriCorps programs and that are suffering from the impacts of climate change, according to the program’s website.

Those serving full time will earn $30,000 and will be eligible for a scholarship at the end of their service, according to an announcement from California Volunteers.

Funding for the state-level programs is being provided through private philanthropy and AmeriCorps, according to California Volunteers’ announcement.

During his 2020 presidential campaign, Biden discussed starting a Civilian Climate Corps. Those efforts were ultimately stymied.

Wednesday, though, Biden signed an executive order launching the new corps that is in many ways modeled after the New Deal’s Civilian Conservation Corps, a Depression-era work relief program that saw young men scatter across the country to work on the nation’s public lands.

According to the White House, the new federal program will see 20,000 young people work on projects like installing energy efficiency items, restoring coastal wetlands and managing forests to prevent wildfires from turning catastrophic.

This story was produced with financial support from the Hartfield Foundation and the 1Earth Fund, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners, as part of an independent journalism fellowship program. The N&O maintains full editorial control of the work.

The next-generation "forest army": Biden launches civilian climate corps program

Elizabeth Hlavinka
Wed, September 20, 2023 

volunteers removing trash Ty ONeil/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

The Biden Administration today launched a civilian Climate Corps program intended to employ 20,000 Americans to build and restore public lands. The idea is to create jobs while also working toward the Biden Administration's promise to reach net zero emissions by 2050, deploying corps members to work in wind and solar production as well as environmental conservation projects. Created in the image of a Great Depression-era civilian climate corps program incorporated by former President Franklin D. Roosevelt, Biden's program aims to "mobilize the next generation of conservation and resilience workers and maximize the creation of accessible training opportunities and good jobs." However, the program will employ far less than the more than 3 million men in Roosevelt's era.

The program was initially outlined in an executive order Biden issued during his first month in office. Originally, $30 billion was set aside for the program as a part of the Inflation Reduction Act, but this was ultimately removed. Administrative officials declined to tell the Washington Post how much or from where funding will come from instead, the outlet reported.

On Monday, House Democrats called on Biden to move forward with the program, citing the urgency of the climate crisis as demonstrated by recent floodingextreme heat and devastating wildfires like those that ravaged Maui in August. "By leveraging the historic climate funding secured during your Administration, using existing authorities and coordinating across AmeriCorps and other relevant federal agencies, your Administration can create a federal Civilian Climate Corps that unites its members in an effort to fight climate change, build community resilience, support environmental justice and develop career pathways to good-paying union jobs focused on climate resilience and a clean economy," they wrote.

On Sunday, tens of thousands of protestors marched in New York City urging Biden to declare a climate emergency, which he still has not done in spite of experts warning of an ongoing "biological holocaust" while humanity dangerously pushes our planet to its extreme limits. Meanwhile, record-shattering heatwaves made summer 2023 the hottest in humanity's history and the U.S. experienced a record-breaking 23 natural disasters exceeding $1 billion in damages.


Opinion

Will Biden's new American Climate Corps match the success of the California Conservation Corps?

David Helvarg
Thu, September 21, 2023 

California Conservation Corps firefighters prepare as flames from the 2021 Alisal fire advance near Refugio Canyon on the Gaviota coast. (Al Seib/Los Angeles Times)

On Wednesday, President Biden used his executive power to establish the American Climate Corps, which will employ and train 20,000 young people in the work of climate resilience.

Similar to but more modest than the famed CCC — the Civilian Conservation Corps established by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 during the Great Depression — the ACC can provide young people with long-term job skills while accelerating the country's transition to renewable energy.

Read more: Editorial: Biden's Climate Conservation Corps could be an old answer for new problems

Biden had hoped an updated, climate-focused version of FDR’s corps would be a provision in the Build Back Better legislative efforts he introduced at the beginning of his term. That agenda got watered down, with the Climate Corps among the losses. Republicans, and a few Democrats — notably Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) — attacked it as a waste of money and “pure socialist wish fulfillment.”

The corps' enemies, however, never questioned that it would be effective. That's because California proved the value of a modern CCC years ago.

The California Conservation Corps, started in 1976 by then-Gov. Jerry Brown, has a current roster of 1,634 members, mostly between the ages of 18 and 29, who typically serve for about a year. They join front-line battles against climate-emergency wildfires and floods, restore river habitat, “manage” forests, build and maintain wilderness trails, and retrofit homes, schools and businesses with solar panels and other forms of clean energy through state contracts.

The corps tallies its achievements with a range of metrics. Since its inception, for example, its members have planted 24.6 million trees, improved national and state parks to the tune of 11 million hours of work, and filled more than 3.5 million sandbags during floods and storms.

Read more: Opinion: On the climate crisis, it's time to lean into pessimism

The payoff has been good for California, but it’s personal too. If new corps members don’t have a high school degree (about 15% to 20% don’t), they’re required to get one through the corps’ school partnerships. That schooling adds 10 hours to their 40-hour work week and opens new opportunities for more training and scholarships. California Conservation Corps alumni have gone on to be professional firefighters, hydrologists, electricians and park rangers.

Over the last few years, I've watched corps crews take chain saws to burned "hazard trees" at a state park east of Lake Tahoe, clear road obstructions during a storm, and cut fire lines under the direction of Cal Fire in Butte County.

One of the chain saw crew members, Elizabeth Wing, who was 21 when we met, summed up her experience with a joke: "We're sure living up to the promise.” She was referring to the guarantee contained in the corps motto: “Hard work, low pay, miserable conditions, and more!” The "more" in the motto works out differently for every corps member.

“I was just drifting job to job and wanted to be part of something larger than myself,” recalled 26-year-old corps firefighter Luie Valez. “I haven’t looked back since.”

Read more: Opinion: We're very far off course in meeting global climate goals. Get ready for Plan B

“I’ve had a lot of crappy jobs, but not this one,” agreed Martin Castellon, who was raised in Tijuana and San Diego, and spent his 26th birthday shoveling snow for the corps at its residential center in Tahoe.

“The thing is it’s not a bunch of troubled youth like a lot of people think,” adds John Alviso, 24, another firefighter and a former Army reservist. “It’s people who want to learn and get a career and are willing to work hard to do that.”

Bruce Saito, the California corps' director, expects his organization and more than 150 similar ones around the nation to "benefit from Biden's incredible move and action." He anticipates "dedicated grants to each state to strengthen and advance the work, [and] enrollment service opportunities for thousands of young folks to serve and address climate issues not just for California."

Read more: Editorial: No more half measures on climate change. The next generation is right to demand an end to fossil fuels

Biden's use of executive power to resuscitate his Climate Corps idea is in part a response to young voters' climate fears and frustrations. When he greenlighted the Willow oil drilling project in Alaska earlier this year, the backlash was immediate from young voters and environmentalists. The national ACC effort, which so far consists of a recruitment website, may help motivate a cohort Biden badly needs in 2024.

On the other hand, the ACC is guaranteed to draw ongoing flak from the same forces that zeroed it out of the Inflation Reduction Act last year. After all, Republican leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R.-Ky.) claimed during the legislation battles that the corps idea was a way to “bully every state to become more and more like California.”

Replace the word "bully" with "inspire" and I have to hope that is exactly what happens.

David Helvarg is a writer; executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean policy group; and co-host of "Rising Tide: The Ocean Podcast."

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Biden’s American Climate Corps Isn’t Enough—but It’s a Start

Tony Ho Tran
Wed, September 20, 2023 
Reuters

President Joe Biden announced the rollout of a New Deal-style program to create 20,000 green jobs for young adults on Wednesday. The American Climate Corps aims to create jobs in green energy, climate resilience, and restoring land and ecosystems while creating a pipeline to long-term careers.

While the program’s goal is to fight the disastrous impact of climate change while juicing the economy, it’s also attempting to address economic inequity by providing jobs and career opportunities to historically underserved communities and populations. The White House said in a statement that these jobs include “restoring coastal wetlands to protect communities from storm surges and flooding, deploying clean energy, managing forests to improve health and prevent catastrophic wildfires, implementing energy efficient solutions to cut energy bills for hardworking families, and more.”

"We're opening up pathways to good-paying careers, lifetimes of being involved in the work of making our communities more fair, more sustainable, more resilient," Ali Zaidi, the White House’s climate policy adviser, told reporters on Wednesday.

The Climate Corps fulfills a campaign promise by Biden, who issued an executive order in his first week in office for the administration to create a green jobs program. The project would aim to “conserve and restore public lands and waters, bolster community resilience, increase reforestation, increase carbon sequestration in the agricultural sector, protect biodiversity, improve access to recreation, and address the changing climate,” Biden wrote at the time.

Emperor Penguins Are Facing Annihilation From Climate Change

The announcement drew praise from climate activists including the Sunrise Movement, which had previously criticized Biden for his lack of action in fighting climate change. However, some experts believe that, while positive, more needs to be done in order to appropriately address what many characterize as an existential risk in climate change.

“My view on the climate initiatives is ‘yes and more,’” James Salzman, a professor of environmental law at the University of California, Berkeley, told The Daily Beast in an email. “There are no obvious downsides or perverse incentives created by the program, so anything additional we can do to address the challenge is better than not.”

“The American Climate Corps' promise to train and employ 20,000 young people is less than one-tenth of the size of the New Deal's Civilian Conservation Corps at its peak of around 300,000 workers,” Jon Christensen, an adjunct professor at the UCLA Institute of Environment and Sustainability and environmental historian, told The Daily Beast. However, he added that “we're living in a very different time. We're not in a depression. Unemployment is near historic lows.”

The American Climate Corps 20,000 jobs is still a fairly modest goal considering the country’s population of more than 330 million people. It also calls into question where exactly these jobs will be focused—and who exactly gets to fill them.

This Tried-and-True Tech Could Prevent a Future Energy Crisis on Mars

While Christensen said that the American Climate Corps was “historically important and significant,” he adds that it is contingent on the Biden administration being able to stay true to its promise of handing the jobs out in an equitable manner while targeting the communities that need it the most.

“It really needs to keep a focus on those with the highest needs,” Christensen said. “There are areas with pockets of unemployment that are higher in the United States—especially disadvantaged, low-income communities of color... This could really have a positive impact on the lives of young people from those communities as they begin their careers.”

Another reason for caution is the fact that the language surrounding the Climate Corps is currently vague. There’s no defined timeline on when things will begin to roll out, nor is there a concrete plan for what initiatives and jobs there will be or how they’ll be deployed.

Put it another way: It’s one thing to say you want to create jobs, tackle climate change, and protect vulnerable communities, it’s another thing entirely to actually do it.

Climate Trauma Is Rewiring Our Brains Into Something Alarmingly Worse

“We need to think about specific improvements,” Mark Jacobson, an associate professor of economics at the University of California San Diego and climate policy expert, told The Daily Beast.

He adds that the challenges involved in the Climate Corps go beyond simply giving people jobs. It’s creating a defined career path for tens of thousands of Americans while attempting to address climate resiliency issues. As such, it requires a more defined and clear-cut path to success beyond the vague sentiments currently outlined by the Biden administration.

“What we have is something that's potentially a little bit harder and more involved,” he said. “And that's why laying that out will be important. The goal has to be about training and improving the future prospects of the folks who sign up now. How exactly is that going to work?”

For now, the Climate Corps is a good first step in addressing current and future climate challenges, while creating jobs for disadvantaged communities. Christensen said he hopes that it gets expanded in the future beyond the current 20,000 job goal. That way even more underrepresented folks have the opportunity to access its benefits.

“It is a historically significant investment in environmental justice,” he said. “But it has to be also accompanied by people from low-income households that have borne the burden of pollution and disinvestment.”

 The Daily Beast.

Climate change is already costing us money, but we have a chance to limit the worst of it and prosper. Here's how.


Marianne Guenot
Thu, September 21, 2023 

Extreme weather is occurring more often. These events pose risks to the economy. AP

This article is part of Insider's "The True Cost of Extreme Weather" project. Read more here.

The climate crisis is about many things. One of them is that tiny numbers add up to big effects.

About two degrees Fahrenheit. That's how much the planet has warmed since the preindustrial era, before the advent of smokestacks and cars.

At least $165 billion. That's how much the US recorded in weather-related damage last year — a total that can't all be blamed on the climate crisis, but has been made worse by a warming world.

This story keeps getting replayed around the world and in people's wallets.


Those costs will only climb if we don't address the climate crisis, economists tell Insider. But in these sometimes-scary numbers, there are is also opportunity — a chance to remake the global economy into one that's far more resilient and in which the climate isn't blowing holes in our wallets.

The ultimate goal, Amir Jina, an environmental economist at the University of Chicago, told Insider, should be to create a world where "climate or weather is a problem as boring as plumbing."

But to get there, we'll need to spend a lot of money up front and be real about the climate costs we're already paying — even if we don't always notice them.
The full costs of extreme weather are often hidden

The biggest fires, floods, and heat waves tend to draw headlines. But for years, the more subtle effects of extreme weather had gone pretty much unnoticed. That's changing.

Research over the past decade has exposed the wider-ranging fallout from wild weather. It's been linked to poorer health and higher mortality, of course. Yet extreme weather is also linked to costs like lower productivity at work, reduced crop yields, and worse mental health. It's also tied to an increased risk of suicide, and higher rates of property crime, murder, rape, and civil unrest.

In short, "How's the weather?" is becoming an increasingly important question. Weather extremes put a strain on society, and that leaves the social safety net to pick up the slack.

"The science on this in the past 10 years has just shown that even in the wealthiest countries, we are very much susceptible to exposure to weather, heat, disasters, etc. in a way which we probably thought we could adapt our way out or spend our way out of," Jina said.

One study looking at the cost of hurricanes between 1979 and 2002 found that about a decade on, the storms cost about tenfold more than the initial amount spent on disaster relief. Those costs, the study found, were hidden in local budgets, in spending on social programs, and in insurance payouts.


People in Tarpon Springs, Florida, had to evacuate their homes after Hurricane Idalia inundated the area over the summer.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images

All of these sleeper effects cost money. And that has to come from somewhere. This "affects the taxes, it affects health insurance, and many other costs that we pay towards the running of the government, and it spreads down across the economy," Jina said.

"There's almost no sector of the economy that people have looked at where we haven't seen a negative effect — particularly of heat," he added.

Still, for many of us, unless we get hit with a big event, we don't always notice when we encounter these costs.

"You could pick up the shadow of extremely hot days on people's incomes at the end of the year," Jina said. "There's this incremental increase in costs that people are facing, where no one in the US, or no one in the world, is truly insulated from the economic consequences of climate change."


As climate disasters rise, social safety nets start to strain


The steepest cost of extreme weather can't be measured in dollars and cents: People are dying, losing loved ones, and forgoing livelihoods.

Yet, for now, governments can offset many of the most acute financial costs of catastrophic events by drawing on emergency funds and letting some of the bills fall to private insurance.

The COVID-19 pandemic was a similar type of catastrophe, Creon Butler, the director of the global economy and finance program at the London think tank Chatham House, told Insider.

Even though the crisis brought enormous costs, many governments managed to shell out enough money to insulate their populations from the worst economic pain, he said.


Record-high temperatures hit Phoenix over the summer.
Mario Tama/Getty Images

Those safety nets and economic buffers will likely start to strain and fail in a warmer world, Butler said, as catastrophes become more common.

Just look at property insurance.


"Insurance only works if the frequency of events doesn't change," Butler said. In a world where extreme weather becomes the norm, "private insurance won't be able to cope with that."

At first, your premiums might start growing so that insurers can keep making a profit, Jina said. Down the line, insurers might decide to pull out of a market entirely. That's already happening in parts of the US.

As the government starts shouldering more of the relief costs, taxes could go up and spending on other priorities like health or education could go down.

"It begins to then raise the question, can the government constantly protect its public?" Butler said. "And the answer is probably no."

Economies lose out if they don't control climate change

Economists haven't agreed on exactly how much climate change will cost in the future, though they do tend to share the sentiment that unless we limit emissions fast, these costs are going to be very difficult to deal with.

"Each new piece of information we learn is showing that the problem is actually worse than we thought," Jina said.

One 2017 paper by Jina and his colleagues, which takes into account climate disasters and the growing effect of extreme weather on society, provides a sneak peek at how much the warming climate could cost the US by the end of the century.


Smoke from Canadian wildfires turned the sky orange over New York City during the summer.
ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images

It found that if little effort is made to control emissions — meaning temperatures rise by about three to six degrees Fahrenheit — these costs could strip about 2% to 5% off of the US gross domestic product every year between 2080 and 2099.

If that estimate proves right, the economy "is probably still going to be growing," but the price of climate change will compound year over year to enormous, avoidable costs, Jina said.

"If we think about the future — even very conservatively — the benefits of mitigation always outweigh the costs," he said.

This situation could be made worse by a looming financial "mega shock," which could arise as more people wake up to the reality of the climate crisis, Butler said.

Investors could suddenly pull out of markets, developing countries could quickly lose access to international financial markets, and people could demand governments bring in rapid policy changes as they see the weather get worse, Butler forecasted in a blog post.

All of this means the longer people take to realize drastic action is needed, the more abrupt the transition will be. And economies aren't very good at dealing with rapid change.
Mitigation and adaptation are going to be expensive, but they'll pay off

There's now a "golden hour" to limit the worst of the effects of climate change and reach the best scenario available today, Jina said.


A woman inspects the damage on Pine Island Road, Florida, after the passage of Hurricane Ian.
Matias J. Ocner/Miami Herald/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

Unfortunately, historic emissions mean that some of the effects of the climate crisis are inevitable, per Jina.

That means some will need to relocate and pricey infrastructure will need to be built to protect others from harsher environments. Countries will also need to invest to slow the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere by moving away from fossil fuels and investing in measures to suck carbon dioxide out of the air.



But those measures won't come cheap.


The Biden administration has already earmarked $52 billion to tackle the climate crisis for 2024. That's likely not enough. Demand for climate spending could make for difficult economic times, Butler said.

"We've got lots of priorities in terms of social care, general health, retirement, and so on. But none of that makes much sense unless you are actually protecting your public," said Butler. "And governments are going to have to choose."
With effort, the climate crisis could be made "boring"

Despite a long list of worries, there's reason for optimism: Climate change has never been so visible, and it's never been higher on the political agenda of government and international meetings, Jina and Butler said. At the same time, the price of renewable energy has dropped much faster than many analysts predicted.

Both Jina and Butler said it's wrong to see the spending going to the net-zero transition as a loss. Instead, they said, we should see it as a necessary investment to build a sustainable and climate-resilient economy.

"We currently have a system, both an energy system and an economic system, where we are quite susceptible to fluctuations in climate, where we are quite susceptible to big disasters, because of an interlinked economy," Jina said. "I would like a transition to an energy economy, facing this global energy challenge that we have, where this just becomes a completely boring issue."



Jina points to how countries brought down the death toll from diarrheal diseases by rolling out plumbing. That initial investment must have seemed huge, yet now we reap the benefits of that infrastructure without even thinking about it, even though stomach bugs are still around.

In the same way, a future economy could mean that thanks to clever adaptation policies, people are able to thrive in spite of an inevitable rise in climate extremes.

"Everything is taken care of. We don't have to talk about it. It's not politically contentious, and people aren't dying," Jina said of this future economy.

Jina and Bulter said most economists agree investment in mitigation and adaptation today will be paid back many times over by the end of the century.

There could be short-term benefits to this investment, according to the UN. For instance, cleaner air could save global economies $1.2 to $4.2 trillion by 2030 by reducing pollution. The transition to renewable energy could create up to 24 million jobs by 2030, compared with an estimated 6 million that could be lost, the UN reported.

As of now, however, only four countries — Botswana, Denmark, Namibia, and the UK — are on track to meet zero greenhouse-gas emissions by 2050, per the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization.

"We're at this point where we could shift pretty dramatically. That really involves people raising their voices and people realizing there might be some short-term pain," Jina said.

Business Insider



First private US passenger rail line in 100 years is about to link Miami and Orlando at high speed

TERRY SPENCER and DANIEL KOZIN
Updated Thu, September 21, 2023 





  
A Brightline train approaches the Fort Lauderdale station on Friday, Sept. 8, 2023, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. The first big test of whether privately owned high-speed passenger train service can prosper in the United States will launch Friday, Sept. 22, when Florida's Brightline begins running trains between Miami and Orlando, reaching speeds of 125 mph (200 kph). 
(AP Photo/Marta Lavandier)

MIAMI (AP) — The first big test of whether privately owned high-speed passenger train service can prosper in the United States will launch Friday when Florida's Brightline begins running trains between Miami and Orlando, reaching speeds of 125 mph (200 kph).

It's a $5 billion bet Brightline's owner, Fortress Investment Group, is making, believing that eventually 8 million people annually will take the 3.5-hour, 235-mile (378-kilometer) trip between the state's biggest tourist hubs — about 30 minutes less than the average drive between the two cities. The company is charging single riders $158 round-trip for business class and $298 for first-class, with families and groups able to buy four round-trip tickets for $398. Thirty-two trains will run daily.

Brightline, which began running its neon-yellow trains the 70 miles (112 kilometers) between Miami and West Palm Beach in 2018, is the first private intercity passenger service to begin U.S. operations in a century. It's also building a line connecting Southern California and Las Vegas that it hopes to open in 2027 with trains that will reach 190 mph (305 kph). The only other U.S. high-speed line is Amtrak's Acela service between Boston and Washington, D.C., which began in 2000. Amtrak is owned by the federal government.

“This is a pretty important moment, whether you’re thinking about it in the context of the state of Florida or what it might mean for these kinds of products as they develop elsewhere in the United States," Brightline CEO Mike Reininger said in a recent interview. “The idea that my car is the only way for me to get where I need to go is being challenged by a new product. A new product that’s safer, that’s greener, that is a great value proposition (and) it’s fun.”

The Florida trains, which run on biodiesel, will travel up to 79 mph (127 kph) in urban areas, 110 mph (177 kph) in less-populated regions and 125 mph (200 kph) through central Florida’s farmland. Brightline plans possible extensions to Tampa and Jacksonville.

John Renne, director of Florida Atlantic University's Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions, said the Miami-Orlando corridor is a perfect spot for high-speed rail — about 40 million Floridians and visitors make the trip annually, with more than 90% of them driving.

If Brightline succeeds that could lead to more high-speed lines between major cities 200 to 300 miles (320 to 480 kilometers) apart, both by Brightline and competitors, he said.

“It is quite exciting for South Florida to kind of be a test bed for what could be seen as a new paradigm for transportation, particularly high-speed rail transportation, in the United States,” Renne said.

Because Brightline is privately owned and seeking a profit, it was more sensitive to getting the project completed quickly to save money. On the government side, Renne pointed to California’s effort to build a high-speed rail system. Approved by voters in 2008, it isn’t near fruition, has already cost billions more than expected and its prospects for completion are uncertain as finding a route through mountains is proving difficult and politicians added dubious side projects. Brightline began planning in 2012.

Brightline's development has suffered setbacks, though. COVID-19 shut down the Miami-West Palm Beach line for 17 months. A 2018 partnership with Richard Branson's Virgin Group to rebrand Brightline as Virgin Trains USA quickly soured. Brightline terminated the partnership in 2020 and Virgin sued in London. According to the lawsuit, Brightline says Virgin “ceased to constitute a brand of international high repute, largely because of matters related to the pandemic." That case is pending.

Then there is the question of safety for residents near the tracks.


Brightline trains have the highest death rate in the U.S., fatally striking 98 people since Miami-West Palm operations began — about one death for every 32,000 miles (51,500 kilometers) its trains travel, according to an ongoing Associated Press analysis of federal data that began in 2019. The next-worst major railroad has a fatality every 130,000 miles (209,200 kilometers).

None of the deaths have been found to be Brightline's fault — most have been suicides, drivers who go around crossing gates or pedestrians running across tracks. The company hasn’t had a fatality since June, its longest stretch except during the pandemic shutdown.

Still, the company's fatality rate concerns officials in the extension area.

Indian River County Sheriff Eric Flowers said a Brightline official seemed callous during a recent meeting, saying he seemed more worried about explaining Brightline’s procedure for getting passengers to their destination after an accident than how it deals with deaths.

“They don’t seem to have any empathy for our community. We’re just in their way,” said Flowers, whose county includes Vero Beach. “It’s a cost of doing business for them that they’re going to run some people over.”

Brightline has taken steps its leaders believe enhance safety, including adding closed-circuit cameras near tracks, installing better crossing gates and pedestrian barriers and posting signage that includes the suicide prevention hotline.

“We have invested heavily in the infrastructure so that we have a safe corridor,” Reininger said. “We continue to operate literally every day with safety at top of mind.”

Reininger said most of Brightline’s Miami-Orlando passengers will come from those who drive the route regularly and others who stay home because they hate the drive. Prime targets are families headed to Orlando’s theme parks and travelers to South Florida’s nightlife, concerts, sports and cruises.

The drive between Miami and Orlando takes about four hours each way on Florida’s Turnpike with round-trip tolls costing between $40 and $60. Gas costs between $50 and $80, plus wear and tear on the vehicle.

Reininger said his company’s challenge is to convince travelers that its trains’ amenities make any extra cost worthwhile.

“It’s the value of your time,” Reininger said. The train “gives you the ability to use your time that you are dedicating to travel in any number of ways that you can’t do when you are behind the wheel.”

Robert Barr, who lives near Miami and publishes guides on rum and South Florida locales, has taken Brightline to West Palm Beach and looks forward to traveling the line to Orlando. He said Brightline’s accommodations “compare really well to some of the best trains” he’s taken in Europe, where high-speed rail between cities is common.

“You’ve got comfortable seats and a relatively quiet ride. It feels very modern,” said Barr.








Miami-Orlando Brightline route is ready to roll. What to know about taking the train

Devoun Cetoute
Fri, September 22, 2023 

Taking a train ride from Miami to Orlando is no longer just talk. Brightline’s new higher-speed rail connection is starting after more than four years in the making.

On Friday, Sept. 22, the inaugural trip was scheduled to leave the downtown Miami station at 6:41 a.m. for a 3-1/2 journey to the recently finished station at Orlando International Airport.

This is Brightline’s sixth stop, and the first outside of South Florida. Trains already run between Miami, Aventura, Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton and West Palm Beach.


Brightline unveils new station at Orlando International Airport on Thursday along with ticket prices and an opening date coming this summer.

Work on the Orlando route got started in June 2019, with station construction starting in January 2022. Leading up to the Orlando route debut, Brightline made history as the fastest train in the Southeast earlier this year, reaching speeds of 130 mph in a test run.

“This is a pretty important moment, whether you’re thinking about it in the context of the state of Florida or what it might mean for these kinds of products as they develop elsewhere in the United States,” Brightline CEO Mike Reininger said in a recent interview with The Associated Press. “The idea that my car is the only way for me to get where I need to go is being challenged by a new product. A new product that’s safer, that’s greener, that is a great value proposition,” and “it’s fun.”

TAKE A LOOK: Brightline unveils new Orlando station. Here’s when you can grab tickets

Here’s what to know Brightline’s newest route:
Where can I buy tickets?

▪ Tickets can be purchased through Brightline’s website (gobrightline.com) and the company’s app. Tickets are available for train rides to Orlando between September and March.

▪ One-way standard tickets, or SMART fares, to Orlando start at $79 for adults and are $39 for kids ages 2 to 12. Round-trip tickets will are available.

▪ Groups of four or more people traveling together can get savings of up to 25% on their fares, according to Brightline.

▪ One-way first-class tickets, called premium fares, start at $149. These tickets come with use of a lounge, priority boarding, and complimentary snacks and beverages.
How long is the Miami to Orlando Brightline trip?

▪ The 235-mile trip from Miami to Orlando takes about 3 1/2 hours, with the train reaching speeds of up to 125 mph.

▪ Brightline earlier this year said it planned to have 16 daily round trips with hourly departures between Miami and Orlando.

▪ The Orlando service also will stop at existing stations in Miami, Aventura, Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton and West Palm Beach, according to the private train company. Brightline says dedicated trains will continue to serve commuters and tourists in South Florida from Miami to West Palm Beach and back again. The only other passenger train service that connects South Florida to other parts of the state is the federally run Amtrak.

Brightline unveiled its new station at Orlando International Airport Thursday along with ticket prices and an opening date sometime in the summer.

How do Brightline passengers get to theme parks?

▪ Brightline offers “first-last mile” connections at Orlando International Airport to help passengers get to Central Florida’s main attractions, about 30 minutes from the station.

▪ Mears Transportation has partnered with Brightline to offer “shared connect shuttles” and “luxury private rides” to certain locations, which can be booked on Brightline’s mobile app and website. The shared connect shuttles run 24/7 and will take passengers to Walt Disney World Resort and 25 other resorts. Fares are $16 one-way for adults and $13 for children. Those 3 and under ride free.

▪ Luxury private rides function like a ride-share. Starting price is $63, and these riders can be taken to wherever passengers want to go.

▪ Brightline passengers are at the airport when they get off the train, which means Orlando International’s sizable ride-share area is available. Access to Uber and Lyft hubs are nearby.

▪ Car rental companies, including Hertz and Enterprise, have hubs at the airport.

▪ Certain hotels in the Orlando area also offer shuttle services from the airport and can be used by booked Brightline passengers.
What’s at the Orlando Brightline station?

▪ Brightline passengers arriving at the Orlando train station will be next to Orlando International Airport’s Terminal C. It connects to one of the airport’s parking garages with spaces reserved for Brightline travelers. Passengers also can reach airport Terminals A and B in under five minutes.

▪ The Orlando station offers self-service kiosks, luggage checks, turnstiles and ticket purchasing.

▪ Food and drink options at the Orlando train station include a sit-down bar called Mary Mary Bar serving cocktails and light food. A store called MRKT PLACE sells gifts and refreshments.

▪ A children’s play area is inside a lounge for travelers that has charging stations, TVs and Wi-Fi.

Comparing transportation options to Orlando

▪ The price of an airline ticket from Miami to Orlando can be unpredictable — all depending on the airline, dates and seating, which can all drop or increase the price of a ticket. Airline tickets usually run between just under $100 all the way to near $300 between Florida’s largest airports (Miami International to Orlando International).

▪ Driving from Miami to Orlando could take 3/12 to 4 hours hours and cost about $30 to $40 for gas.

What to know about Brightline

▪ Brightline, a private company, began South Florida service in 2018 with stations in downtown Miami, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. Stations in Aventura and Boca Raton opened in December 2022. The train stopped running for a year and a half during the height of the pandemic before resuming service and adding stations.

▪ The trains travel on tracks east of the separate Tri-Rail tracks, which run along the I-95 corridor between Miami airport and West Palm Beach.

▪ The trains go faster than Tri-Rail and freight trains, reaching speeds of more than 100 mph. That has led to safety issues at rail crossings, and dozens of crashes, many involving drivers that try to beat the train signals and don’t make it across in time as the faster yellow trains approach.
Chinese Car Brands Are Coming to the US, Still—with EVs Built in Mexico

Todd Lassa
Wed, September 20, 2023 



When Do Chinese EVs Invade the US?GAC

The Biden administration has not rescinded the Trump administration’s Chinese tariffs that impose an extra 25% on top of a 2.5% import tariff for vehicles.

But Chinese electric vehicles are making their way into global markets (including Mexico) and soon will practically surround the United States and Canada, according to an AutoForecast Solutions special report.

ZoZoGo CEO and Asian auto market expert Michael Dunne expects Chinese-branded models (beside Chevrolets, Buicks, Dodges, Volvos, and Polestars built there) to come to the US market no earlier than 2025.

January 2019 marked the last time Chinese automakers were on the brink of importing passenger vehicles under their own brand names into the United States.

For about a decade at that point, various Chinese automakers had displayed cars and concepts at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, when there were still major auto shows.

In 2019, Chinese giant GAC Motor displayed its “bullet-inspired” Entranze 3+2+2 EV concept (pictured above) from a prime spot inside Detroit’s convention center. GAC also flew in a group of foreign auto journalists and a small fleet of production models: the GA4 sedan and the GS3, GS4, GS5, and GS8 SUVs, along with the GE3 battery-electric vehicle.

GAC said at the ’19 show it would begin importing its Toyota Highlander-like GS8 to the US by the first half of 2020, but that already was pushed back from an earlier goal of late 2019, thanks to the Trump administration’s new hardline tariffs.


GAC executives also attended the National Auto Dealers Association annual meeting in San Francisco later that January to line up dealers.

As the coronavirus shut down much of the globe in the first half of 2020, GAC was largely forgotten here. Similarly, Geely’s ambitious upmarket youth brand aimed in part at the US, Lynk & Co., a line of EVs designed in Sweden and to be built in China. But that plan was canceled, and the brand name was relegated to electric scooters.

Geely-owned Zeekr X EV.Zeekr

When the Inflation Reduction Act became law in 2022, its expansive environmental component included strict local sourcing and manufacturing requirements that place imported electric vehicles at a great disadvantage: They would not be eligible for tax credits that could reduce an EV’s sticker price by as much as $7500.

On top of that, the Biden administration has not rescinded the Trump administration’s Chinese tariffs that impose an extra 25% on top of a 2.5% import tariff.

So the United States won’t see Chinese-branded EVs any time in this decade, right? IRA tax incentives run up through 2030 and depending on the political climate by then, could be extended for years.

But Chinese electric vehicles are making their way into global markets and soon will practically surround the United States and Canada, according to an AutoForecast Solutions special report in September, “Cars from China are Coming.”

Global Vehicle Forecasting Vice President Sam Fiorani writes that under the country’s Belt and Road initiative, Chinese automakers first began exports to countries in South America, Africa, and southeast Asia.

“As the vehicle quality improved, these OEMs branched out into Eastern Europe, India, and Mexico. Success has been swift and primary markets in Western Europe are the next great target.”

AutoPacific’s president and chief analyst, Ed Kim, says he spots Chinese cars with Mexican plates from around his Southern California office all the time.

Mexican policy “has increasingly favored Chinese imports,” Kim says, and not just automobiles, “to help fight the effects of inflation.”

Chinese brands broke into the Mexican market in 2017, according AFS. Vehicles built in China, mostly sold under the Chevrolet, Dodge, and Ford brands, have reached 18.5% market share there, “but the Chinese brands are growing quickly. In just its third year on the market, (SAIC’s) MG has grown to 4.1% with the support of the MG5, MG GT, and MG ZS. Privately held Chery launched this year and took 3% of the market thanks to the Omoda 5, Tiggo 4, and Tiggo 7 crossovers.”


Chinese-built 2023 XPeng P7 EV.XPeng Motors

Kim notes that the Chery brand is called “Chirey” in Mexico because Malcolm Bricklin owns the name Chery in North America. Bricklin’s Visionary Vehicles signed a deal in 2005 with Chery to sell its cars here, but the deal had soured by 2008.

“Given Chinese automakers’ global ambitions and also because the Chinese economy is flattening out, expansion has an existential purpose and will be important to their continued growth and survival,” Kim says via email. “Through whatever means, Chinese automakers will eventually sell in the US market.”

ZoZoGo CEO and Asian auto market expert Michael Dunne expects Chinese-branded models (beside Chevrolets, Buicks, Dodges, Volvos, and Polestars built there) to come to the US market no earlier than 2025. But that first Chinese vehicle in the US would almost certainly have to be an ICE model.

From the outside looking in, the Chinese auto industry seems to have moved on to EVs, with “at least” 40 of the country’s 138 automakers building only battery-electrics, according to the Chinese Association of Automobile Manufacturers.

The trade group says China purchased 6.8 million EVs in 2022, which is 6 million more EVs than were sold in the US last year.

China’s EV market is so advanced that obsolete electric vehicles are rusting on large fields outside big cities there, Bloomberg reports.

“Given the insane amount of innovation happening in Chinese EVs right now, and because many global automakers remain somewhat blissfully unaware of just how ahead of the game many of these new Chinese EVs are, we could be looking at a repeat of the Japanese automakers’ arrival in the 1970s and 1980s,” AutoPacific’s Kim says.

Just as Hyundai and Kia built factories in the US despite their cost disadvantage versus South Korea, Chinese automakers could consider constructing factories in Mexico, where their business is growing quickly, to build cars for the US market without the high tariffs.

“It will be tough, but not impossible, for a company like BYD or GAC to enter the US market,” AFS’ Fiorani says. “They’re already selling in good numbers in Mexico. Once they get those volumes high enough, they’ll open a local plant. With local content, they can get around the 25% tariff. JAC already assembles locally, but their products are not competitive enough to tap into the US market. BYD and Great Wall Motors are far more likely to work in the US.”

General Motors' (GM) Ontario Plant Halts BrightDrop Production


Zacks Equity Research
Wed, September 20, 2023 


General Motors Company GM will halt the production of BrightDrop commercial vans in its Ontario plant from October until next spring due to delayed delivery of battery-modules that power the vehicle.

The production of commercial vans in CAMI Assembly will resume in the spring of 2024, underpinned by the launch of CAMI’s new battery module line. The line will produce enough battery modules to fully support the production of BrightDrop vans and supplement electric vehicle (EV) production at other General Motors plants.

In July, Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors, discussed an unspecified issue that decelerated its EV production. The matter involved General Motors’ unnamed automation equipment supplier, which struggled with delivery issues.
The auto giant sent a manufacturing engineering team to help the suppliers regulate its deliveries.

General Motors has also deployed manual module assembly lines at its EV plants, including the CAMI Ingersoll plant. The 400,000-square-foot plant, which will begin battery module production in the second quarter of 2024, is dedicated to producing BrightDrop Zevo and other EVs.

The CAMI plant also suspended operation in July for two weeks due to the unavailability of parts after two weeks of summer downtime.

General Motors met its goal of manufacturing 50,000 EVs in North America during the first half of 2023 and aims for around 100,000 EVs in the second half.
Zacks Rank & Key Picks

GM currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
UAW workers strike at Mercedes supplier ZF's plant in Alabama

Sept 20 (Reuters) - The United Auto Workers (UAW) union said on Wednesday that 190 workers went on strike at Mercedes-supplier ZF's plant in Alabama, demanding higher pay and better healthcare benefits.

The workers are also seeking an end to the tier system of wages, under which older employees get higher pay than newer workers for the same job.


ZF, which makes front axles used by Mercedes, said the plant in Tuscaloosa would operate while talks with the union continue.

"We remain committed to continuing negotiations in good faith and are hopeful that we can come to a resolution soon," a ZF spokesperson said in a statement.

Mercedes Benz did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

UAW members are also on a separate strike at three plants operated by the Detroit Three automakers - Ford Motor, General Motors and Stellantis - demanding better contracts from the companies. (Reporting by Abhinav Parmar in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur)


CLASS WAR
UAW president: Economy ‘enriches people like Donald Trump’ at workers’ expense

Joe Jacquez
Tue, September 19, 2023


United Auto Workers (UAW) president Shawn Fain made it clear he doesn’t approve of former President Trump’s trip next week to Detroit amid the union’s ongoing strike against the Big Three automakers.

“Every fiber of our union is being poured into fighting the billionaire class and an economy that enriches people like Donald Trump at the expense of workers,” UAW President Shawn Fain said in a statement to CNN.

The Hill has reached out to Fain and UAW.

As workers continue to stand on the picket line, demanding wage increases and benefits from Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, Trump will deliver prime-time remarks to current and former union workers in Detroit instead of attending the second Republican presidential primary debate Sept. 27.

Trump, who won Michigan narrowly in 2016 but lost the state in 2020, may attempt to appeal to union workers, a critical voting block for President Biden and Democrats. But Fain said UAW’s message directly contrasts with who Trump is and what he represents.

Union workers have long been seen as a key cog of the Democratic base, but polling from the last presidential election indicates these voters may be shifting allegiances.

While Biden garnered the most votes from union households (56 percent) compared to 40 percent for Trump, according to exit polling by CNN, Trump won the support of workers with less than a college degree in 2016 and again in 2020, by 7 and 8 percentage points respectively, according to The Pew Research Center.

Biden has repeatedly claimed he is the most pro-union president, but Fain has yet to endorse the president, saying last week that endorsements have to be earned and members need to see “actions not words,” from Biden.

“Our endorsements are going to be earned. We’ve been very clear about that, no matter what politician.”

Fain’s decision not to endorse Biden is driven by concerns about federal electric vehicle (EV) policies. The Biden administration has pushed for an industry shift to EVs, which require fewer workers to make, and the concern is how such a transition could impact workers jobs and pay.

Trump says he always had autoworkers' backs. Union leaders say his first-term record shows otherwise

UAW strike keeping Big 3 automakers 'on their toes': Journalist



JOEY CAPPELLETTI and MICHELLE L. PRICE
Thu, September 21, 2023 

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — When former President Donald Trump visits Detroit next week, he’ll be looking to blunt criticisms from a United Auto Workers union leadership that has said a second term for him would be a “disaster" for workers.

Trump will bypass the second Republican presidential debate on Sept. 27 to instead visit striking autoworkers in Michigan, where he has looked to position himself as an ally of blue-collar workers by promising to raise wages and protect jobs if elected to a second term.

But union leaders say Trump's record in the White House speaks for itself. Union leaders have said his first term was far from worker-friendly, citing unfavorable rulings from the nation’s top labor board and the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as unfulfilled promises of automotive jobs. While the United Auto Workers union has withheld an endorsement in the 2024 presidential race, its leadership has repeatedly rebuffed Trump.

Nevertheless, Trump plans to speak directly to a room of former and current union members. A Trump campaign radio ad released Tuesday in Detroit and Toledo, Ohio, praised auto workers and said the former president has “always had their back.”

Not everyone thinks so. Despite Trump's history of success in courting blue-collar workers in previous elections, union leaders say their members would do well to believe their own eyes.

“Just look who Trump put in the courts," said Dave Green, the UAW regional director for Ohio and Indiana. “Look at his record with the labor relations board. He did nothing to support organized labor except lip service.”

The National Labor Relations Board, which enforces the country’s labor laws and oversees union elections, came under Republican control during the Trump administration for the first time since 2007. The board reversed several key Obama-era rulings that made it easier for small unions to organize, strengthened the bargaining rights of franchise workers and provided protection against anti-union measures for employees.

In 2017, the Trump-era board reversed a decision holding employers responsible for labor violations by subcontractors or franchisees. In 2019, the board gave a boost to companies that use contract labor, such as Lyft and Uber, by emphasizing “entrepreneurial opportunity” in determining a worker’s employment status, making organizing harder.

Mark McManus, president of the plumbers and pipefitters union, said in a statement Tuesday that Trump “tried to gut” the labor relations board under his administration “to undo the safeguards that protect working families.” Michigan AFL-CIO President Ron Bieber told The Associated Press in an emailed statement that the board was stacked with “anti-worker appointees who trampled on collective bargaining rights.”

The union leaders also point to unfavorable U.S. Supreme Court rulings under a conservative majority that grew during Trump's term. The nation's high court has dealt a number of blows to unions, most recently ruling against unionized drivers who walked off the job with their trucks full of wet cement, allowing a civil suit against them to go forward.

In 2018, the court’s conservative majority overturned a decades-old pro-union decision involving fees paid by government workers. The justices in 2021 rejected a California regulation giving unions access to farm property so they could organize workers.

“If you’re appointing conservatives to the court, you’re often appointing people who relate to the preference for business or property owners or shareholders, more than the preference of stakeholders like workers," said Peter Berg, a professor of labor relations at Michigan State University.

As president, Trump largely sat on the sidelines during a 40-day walkout at a General Motors plant in 2019.

Still, the Trump campaign vigorously defended his record as pro-worker.

“President Trump has always been on the side of American workers,” his campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement.

Cheung responded to the criticisms from labor leaders with a long list of economic gains and policies from Trump's time as president, ranging from the surging stock market to low unemployment. He cited Trump's broad push to remove regulations and abandon or renegotiate trade deals as beneficial to American workers across a range of industries.

Republicans have long tried to position themselves as being anti-union while remaining pro-worker. The party has branded itself as being for “the working class” while attacking organized labor, which has supported the Democratic Party for decades.

Trump has used a similar tactic in an effort to separate workers from a UAW leadership that endorsed Democrat Joe Biden in 2020 and that has attacked Trump since. In a recent campaign video addressed to autoworkers, Trump encouraged them not to pay union dues and claimed union leaders have “got some deals going for themselves.” Trump also claimed he would raise their wages and protect their jobs.

Job growth figures in the auto industry during Trump's presidency contradict his claim that the industry thrived under his watch. The total number of auto manufacturing jobs in Michigan, which holds the most automotive jobs in the U.S., stayed even during Trump’s presidency.

In Ohio, the number of auto manufacturing jobs grew by fewer than 2,000 jobs during Trump's four years in the White House. But Green, the UAW director, said some communities that had backed Trump in 2016 were abandoned by him. He pointed to Lordstown, Ohio, an area that Trump won by a significant margin in 2016 and where Green previously served as the local UAW president.

In 2017, during a visit to the region, Trump pledged that jobs there were “all coming back” and implored residents to stay put. A year later, General Motors announced the closure of its Lordstown plant, one of the largest employers in the area.

“The guy came to my community and flat out lied to everybody,” Green said last week. “Banks were closing, schools were shutting down. I wrote the guy two letters, and he didn’t even reply.”

AP VoteCast shows that in the 2020 presidential election, Trump was the choice of 62% of white voters without a college degree, whereas Biden won the vote of 37% in this group. Biden performed better than Trump did among union members, receiving 56% of union members’ votes in the 2020 election, compared with Trump’s 42%.

Trump hopes in 2024 to win back the support of union-friendly states such as Michigan, which became the first in nearly 60 years to repeal a union-restricting law known as “right-to-work.” It's one of three Rust Belt states along with Pennsylvania and Wisconsin that broke for Democrats but where Trump narrowly won in 2016, carrying him into the White House. He lost those states to Biden in the 2020 election.

—-

Price reported from New York. AP Polls and Surveys reporter Linley Sanders contributed from Washington.