Wednesday, March 02, 2022

KENNEY DIKTAT

Alberta to ban Edmonton and any other municipalities from keeping mask mandate or any COVID restrictions

The move, once introduced as a bill and passed, would put the province in a position to overrule Edmonton's mask bylaw, which remains in effect locally

Article content

EDMONTON — The Alberta government has vowed to ban municipalities from enacting their own COVID-19-related public-health rules, preventing them from contradicting the direction of the provincial government, which has dropped nearly all pandemic restrictions.

The move, announced Tuesday, once introduced as a bill and passed, would put the province in a position to overrule Edmonton’s mask bylaw, which remains in effect locally. The reforms would limit the powers a municipality has to enact public-health-related bylaws.

“It was a bit odd coming in here not wearing a mask, but it was also pretty awesome,” Premier Jason Kenney said in Red Deer.

Edmonton appears to be the only municipality in Alberta to retain a mask bylaw, and certainly the largest city to have one; Calgary dropped its municipal mask bylaw alongside the provincial mandate on Tuesday. (Under the provincial rules, masking remains in effect on transit and in health-care settings.)

Kenney said a patchwork of public-health policy will only feed confusion and division in the province, and eliminating municipal discretion would prevent “virtue signalling” from local councillors.

Advertisem

Article content

“We need to move forward together. There has been too much division over the COVID era in our society,” said Kenney. “We certainly shouldn’t allow political science to be a substitute for public-health science.”

Edmonton Mayor Amarjeet Sohi, speaking Tuesday afternoon, condemned the provincial announcement as “overreach” and warned it could have effects well beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the province could use similar moves to interfere in decisions like development plans or smoking bylaws.

“It is about time that provinces recognize us as an equal order of government and do not meddle into the affairs where we can make our own decisions,” said Sohi.

Advertisement

Article content

Duane Bratt, a political scientist at Mount Royal University, described Edmonton’s mask policy as “all politics.”

“It’s not all politics by the Kenney government, right? I mean, the city councils of Calgary and Edmonton are playing their own political games,” said Bratt. “Now, maybe not so much when they first imposed it, but keeping it up is a way of showing opposition to the Kenney government…. So, when you talk about politics, there’s the politics of COVID and then there’s the overall politics where the big cities see themselves as a separate sphere, as a counteracting power to the provincial government. And we’ve seen that for a very long time in this province.”

While cities in Canada are “creatures” of provincial governments, Alberta’s Municipal Government Act, seemingly, gives local government wide latitude to pass bylaws regarding “the safety, health and welfare of people and the protection of people and property.”

Advertisement

Article content

Lorian Hardcastle, a health law expert at the University of Calgary, said the provincial government does have the authority to adjust the powers of municipalities, but argued it sets a “negative precedent” for the province to intervene when it doesn’t like what a municipality is doing.

“Public health is the purview of all levels of government, municipal, provincial and federal. And municipalities do a ton of important work in the area of public health. They deal with water fluoridation, they pass safety bylaws related to things like bike helmets, they pass bylaws dealing with cannabis and tobacco consumption,” Hardcastle said. Joe Ceci, the New Democrat critic for municipal affairs, said Kenney’s announcement is a “dramatic reversal from when the UCP not only allowed but forced local governments to make public health decisions.” Kenney’s announcement, which comes roughly one month after he hinted at such legislation in a Facebook Live, represents a complete shift from July 2020. At the time, when asked about why there was no province-wide mask mandate, Kenney said Alberta was too large and diverse for one-size-fits-all policy.

Advertisement

Article content

“We think these decisions are better taken locally,” Kenney said, at the time.

Now, he said, the argument his government is making is that public health is the province’s responsibility not a municipality’s, and that cities “improvising” health-care policy is “unhelpful and divisive.”

“We appreciate the care and concern of people in municipal government about these issues, and we’re always willing to listen to their views about public-health policy but we think as we go into this phase, getting our lives back to normal, it’s important that there be unity, clarity, consistency,” Kenney said.

Sohi argued that the cities have stepped in when the provincial government had dropped the ball during the pandemic, and that while health care is indeed a provincial responsibility, “protecting the well-being of Edmontonians is also a municipal responsibility.

Advertisement

Article content

“This is not about grandstanding. This is not about political support. This is about making good decisions based on the needs of local communities and listening to our health experts,” Sohi said.

Kenney’s announcement may be more or less moot, though, because it will take time to introduce and pass legislation modifying the Municipal Government Act, and Edmonton’s city bylaw will be reviewed by council on March 8. At that point, it may be revoked.

“The vast majority of Alberta’s municipalities have aligned with provincial public health policy,” said Scott Johnston, press secretary Municipal Affairs.

“Other Canadian provinces generally approach municipal bylaws in a similar way to Alberta. Municipalities are provided with broad authority to implement bylaws, with certain limitations. These limitations vary province to province; however, in all instances, provincial legislation trumps municipal bylaws.”

Provincial statistics show there are roughly 9,000 active cases across the province, with 1,224 in hospital and 83 people in intensive-care units; 3,912 Albertans have died from the virus.

— With additional reporting from the Calgary Herald

• Email: tdawson@postmedia.com | Twitter: tylerrdawson

Alberta to force municipalities to lift mask bylaws

'We certainly shouldn't allow political science to be a

substitute for public health science,' Kenney says

BUT WE DO!
Alberta Premier Jason Kenney and Health Minister Jason Copping announced Tuesday the province will introduce legislation as early as next week to prevent municipalities from enforcing their own face covering mandates. (Sam Martin/CBC, Jocelyn Boissonneault/CBC)

The Alberta government is moving to force all municipalities in the province to lift their COVID-19 mask bylaws. 

"Something that Albertans do not deserve right now is uncertainty and confusion," Premier Jason Kenney said at a news conference in Red Deer Tuesday.

"That is why I am announcing today that Alberta's government will introduce in the legislature, as soon as possible, amendments to the Municipal Government Act which will remove the abilities of municipalities to impose their own separate public health restrictions."

The Alberta government lifted its mask mandate as of March 1 as part of its general easing of COVID-19 restrictions. 

Calgary ended its face covering bylaw at the same time.

However, the City of Edmonton's face-covering bylaw remains in effect. Edmonton city council will hold a special meeting on March 8 to discuss its mask bylaw.

"A patchwork of separate policies across the province could just lead to greater division, confusion, enforcement difficulty with no compelling public health rationale," Kenney said.

Premier Jason Kenney says amendments to the municipal government act are needed to "prevent a patchwork of different policies across the province" that could "create unnecessary division and confusion amongst the public." 4:11

"That's why we have decided to move forward united with a clear, consistent approach that all Albertans can easily understand and comply with. 

"We certainly shouldn't allow political science to be a substitute for public health science."

Kenney said he hopes the amendments to legislation will be introduced in the legislature as early as next week.

'Far-reaching implications,' Sohi says

Edmonton Mayor Amarjeet Sohi called Kenney's announcement "deeply disappointing" and said amending the Municipal Government Act could affect the way the city responds to the pandemic and other city operations.

"This has far-reaching implications," Sohi said during a news conference Tuesday afternoon.

"This overreach of power and abuse of authority under the MCA goes beyond the mask bylaw." 

It could restrict the city's autonomy in managing or restricting other activities, things like smoking and traffic bylaws, he said.

Sohi said he's consulting the city's legal department to see what options are available to oppose Kenney's move. 

Edmonton mayor Amarjeet Sohi described the decision to amend the Municipal Government Act as "deeply disappointing." 3:09

Edmonton's face-covering bylaw was put in place in August 2020, before the province mandated masks in indoor public places.

Near the beginning of the pandemic, Kenney's government encouraged individual municipalities to implement their own mask mandates.

Now, Sohi said, the province is treating the municipalities like children when it should be recognizing their efforts. 

"Particularly during the pandemic, municipalities in Alberta acted like adults to protect our citizens' well-being and looking after the health and safety of our citizens during these very difficult times. It's about time the province recognizes us as an equal order of government."

Cathy Heron, president of Alberta Municipalities, said Kenney's announcement is cause for concern

"Alberta Municipalities finds the provincial government's 'top-down' approach to be heavy-handed and unnecessary," Heron said in a news release Tuesday. 

The idea of amending the MGA was never formally discussed with Alberta Municipalities, she added.  

Potential Charter challenge

University of Alberta law professor, Eric Adams, said Kenney is leaning in the opposite direction of the traditional conservative government that tends to support local decision-making. 

"They certainly feel that way about federal regulation over provincial matters," he said. "So it's a bit curious in that respect." 

Adams said it'll be up to voters to decide whether this is a good direction for the UCP.

"We see the rather remarkable moment of a conservative government saying that local governments and diversity is now bad." 

Adams said the city could consider challenging the move under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

"By taking away a power that cities have to keep their citizens safe, are you effectively at the provincial level making cities less safe? That's a question that may receive some constitutional attention in the months to follow," he said.  

Nearly all pandemic public health measures were lifted in the province as of Tuesday, as the Alberta government launched Step 2 of its reopening plan. 

On Saturday, Kenney announced that the phased approach to further lift restrictions — and adopt an endemic approach to COVID-19 —  would go ahead as planned.

Remaining school requirements, including cohorting, have been lifted, along with youth screening for entertainment and sports. 

Capacity limits on all large venues and entertainment venues, limits on indoor and outdoor gatherings and a mandatory work-from-home mandate have all been removed.

"We cannot live forever in fear and we are social beings," Kenney said.

"We are made to encounter one another, to see each other's faces, to smile, to embrace our family and friends, to regain the social lives that we have been so deeply impaired for the past two years and that is exactly what this plan allows us to do."

While the provincial mask mandate has been removed, face coverings are still required in some high-risk settings, including at Alberta Health Services facilities and continuing care sites, and on public transit.

Kenney has said the province is working toward a third stage of its reopening plan where people would no longer be required to isolate if they have COVID-19. That step would also see the lifting of COVID operational and outbreak protocols in continuing care facilities. 

The province is reviewing issues around the "waning protection of vaccines," the growing transmissibility of COVID-19, and the cost and inaccuracy of rapid antigen tests, Kenney said.

"We need to address the workforce challenges that we are facing, particularly in nursing homes and some rural hospitals in under-vaccinated areas, given that there is no longer a compelling policy rationale for proof of vaccination programs," he said.

There is no set date for Step 3 but Kenney has said each stage is contingent on hospitalization trends.

Provincial data shows non-ICU hospitalizations have been generally declining for over two weeks, while the number of ICU admissions has dropped.

"This does not mean that COVID-19 is not still a concern in Alberta," Health Minister Jason Copping said. "We will continue to monitor the impact of the virus and any other variants that make their way into our province.

"We will have to adjust to assessing risks and making decisions that are best for us and our families."

On Tuesday, the province reported 1,225 people were in hospital with COVID-19, including 80 in ICU. Both numbers were largely unchanged from the previous day's update. The province also reported an estimated 500 new cases of COVID-19. 

Due to technical issues the province did not provide a full COVID data update and did not report the number of deaths or the positivity rate. A full update is expected on Wednesday. 

  

City responds to Alberta’s loosening of COVID-19 restrictions

BY LETHBRIDGE HERALD ON MARCH 1, 2022.
 The City of Lethbridge is lifting restrictions on staff including the COVID-19 vaccination policy as the province moves into Phase 2 of its work to cut COVID measures.

Al Beeber – Lethbridge Herald

The City of Lethbridge is lifting restrictions on staff including the COVID-19 vaccination policy as the province moves into Phase 2 of its work to cut COVID measures.

On Tuesday, Alberta made numerous changes to provincial policy which included lifting the mask mandate except on municipal and intra-provincial public transit for Albertans 13 and older and in AHS-operated and contracted facilities as well as all continuing care facilities.

The Kenney government also lifted mandatory work-from-home requirements and capacity limits on all large venues.

Lethbridge People and Culture Manager Jason Elliott said Tuesday “effective today we’ve rescinded our COVID vaccination policy.”

He said the city is following all provincial health changes as they relate to mandatory work from home and other things affecting City employees.

“Throughout this pandemic, we’ve worked hard to comply with the provincial direction on any health measures that are put in place and it’s no different when the health measures are removed that we’re working hard to comply with those removal orders as well.”

Elliott said the City is doing so in “a very careful and methodical way. Just as we got into the putting measures in place, we’re moving very carefully in removing the measures to ensure the continued health and safety of our staff and the community, in general.”

For City staff, changes mean depending on the work situation, employees may start returning to work. The majority of them never left them, he said, with many of them customer service providers whose efforts in the past two years are important to recognize.

“The majority of staff who have been working remotely, a good portion of those are office related staff, that aren’t necessarily customer service forward facing and as a result, we’ll work on bringing those folks back over time subject to other practises that we put in place,” Elliot added.

With two years in this environment, the City has had time to look at what workplace needs may be “and we’re looking at a few folks anyway remaining working remotely where their job function permits.”

Masking will be optional except in Transit, Fire/EMS and at the airport.

“We will certainly encourage staff to do what they feel they need to do and want to do to ensure their own personal health and safety,” Elliott said.

“We do have a couple of operational areas that are under different rules and regulations such as our Fire/EMS folks follow under the AHS policies so those still remain in place and our airport staff are federally regulated so there will be some specific requirements that those staff are asked to comply with.” Those areas are in addition to the requirements for Transit staff.

The public is no longer required to mask so “therefore we won’t be requiring employees to mask. We will certainly support anybody in the public or staff who are comfortable in still wearing a mask.

“This will continue to be a dynamic situation and we will continue to monitor it,” Elliott added.

Follow @albeebHerald on Twitter


Jason Kenney has a Russia problem

By Max Fawcett | Opinion, Politics | March 1st 2022

The oil and gas industry Alberta Premier Jason Kenney holds up as ethical has some very unethical Russian money in it, writes columnist Max Fawcett. 
Photo via Alberta Newsroom / Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

There are few things Jason Kenney loves more than talking about how ethical Alberta’s oil and gas industry is. But when it comes to actually doing something about those ethics, he seems far less interested. Witness the response this week to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine from other oil- and gas-producing regions and the stark contrast between the decisions they’re making and the ones Alberta isn’t.

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund announced it will immediately freeze any new investments in Russia and start divesting the $3.1 billion worth of Russian assets in its portfolio. British Petroleum went a step further, announcing it will unload its stake in Rosneft, the Russian state-owned oil and gas company, at a substantial financial cost. According to Reuters reporters Ron Bousso and Dmitry Zhdannikov, “Rosneft accounts for around half of BP’s oil and gas reserves and a third of its production and divesting the 19.75 per cent stake will result in charges of up to US$25 billion, the British company said, without saying how it plans to extricate itself.”

In Alberta, Kenney has been busy tweeting about “dictator oil” and why dead pipeline projects like Keystone XL and Energy East should be revived. And while it’s impossible to miss the stench of his crass opportunism, there are also some notes of desperation in there if you sniff around a little more. After all, the oil and gas industry Kenney holds up as ethical has some very unethical Russian money in it.

Take Spartan Delta Corp., an Alberta oil and gas company with more than 60,000 barrels per day of production and one very powerful oligarch in its corner. According to Financial Post reporting, Russian billionaire Igor Makarov is — or at least was, as of March 2021 — Spartan’s largest shareholder, with his Switzerland-based ARETI Energy S.A. controlling 21 per cent of the company. Makarov, a former Olympic cyclist, previously founded Itera Oil and Gas Company, which was the largest privately held energy company in Russia until it was sold to Rosneft in 2013.

Makarov is hardly the only Russian oligarch involved in Canada’s oil and gas industry. The more troublesome connection for Kenney might be the one between Evraz PLC — the British-based steel company that’s a key supplier for both the Coastal GasLink pipeline and the Trans Mountain expansion — and the trio of Russians who control it. In 2018, the U.S. Department of the Treasury put Roman Abramovich, Evraz’s controlling shareholder, along with non-executive chairman Aleksandr Abramov and then-CEO Aleksandr Frolov, on its so-called “Putin list” of politicians and oligarchs who had benefited from their ties to the Russian president.

This is still flying under the radar for the most part in Canada, but it’s already big news in the U.K., where Abramovich owns the Premier League’s Chelsea football club. The image of a trio of Russian oligarchs owning the company that’s fabricating the steel for the Coastal GasLink pipeline and Trans Mountain is a very bad look, and it’s one Kenney should be highly attuned to. He knows how important LNG Canada, which depends on CGL for its feedstock, is to Alberta’s oil and gas industry. And he surely understands how this relationship could be used to slow its construction — or stop it entirely.

If Kenney wants to avoid having this blow up in his face, he needs to do more than tweet about pipelines. Yes, he gave a speech in the Alberta legislature calling on the federal government to freeze the assets of Russian oligarchs in Canada, but he did it at the same time reporters were in an embargoed news conference about the budget with provincial Finance Minister Travis Toews. Crucially, he has yet to repeat the message he delivered to the legislature on his social media channels.

Any and all involvement by Russian oligarchs in his province’s ostensibly ethical oil industry is a non-starter, and companies that have benefited from their money should own up to it if it’s still there. The involvement of an oligarch-owned steel company in the Coastal GasLink pipeline should never have been allowed to happen, and it should be rectified as quickly as possible. And if Kenney really wants to be ethical, his UCP should probably return the $4,243 maximum donation in 2021 from Don Archibald, who sits on Spartan Delta’s board of directors.

Oh, and if Alberta’s premier really wants to “defang Putin,” as he said in a recent tweet, then he should forget about new pipelines — which wouldn’t come into service until the end of the decade under even the most optimistic scenarios — and focus on helping Europe and other importing nations get off fossil fuels and onto renewables that Russia doesn’t control.

Alberta’s energy companies could even invest in projects in Europe that increase the continent’s energy security and reduce its carbon footprint. But that would cost real money, not cheap talk.


March 1st 2022

Max Fawcett Columnist @maxfawcett


$4,094 rent for three bedrooms now meets Vancouver’s definition of “for-profit affordable housing”

by Carlito Pablo on March 1st, 2022


A Rositch Hemphill Architects rendering of the proposed rental development at 277-291 West 42nd Avenue.

The City of Vancouver grants many incentives for developers of “for-profit affordable rental housing”.

It’s a policy that started during the time of then Mayor Gregor Robertson and his Vision Vancouver council.

The program continues with the current council led by Mayor Kennedy Stewart.

City incentives include waivers on the payment of development cost levies or DCLs, which typically amount to millions of dollars.

To be exempted from paying DCLs, the starting rents should not exceed rates set by the city based on average rents for all residential units built in Vancouver since 2005.

For those on the West Side of the city, the rents are set higher by 10 percent compared to the East Side.

A city staff report on a rezoning application provides an update on what West Side rates now qualify as “for-profit affordable rental housing”.

Marcon Properties Ltd. filed the application on behalf of W 42 Properties E Nominee Corp. to rezone 277-291 West 42nd Avenue.

The development involves an 18-storey residential building with 211 rental units.

The staff report listed the maximum starting rents for West Side rentals that could qualify for a DCL waiver.

For three-bedroom units, that would be $4,094.

For two bedrooms, it’s $2,912; one bedroom, $2,224; and studio, $1,818.

The Marcon Properties project includes only two-bedroom, one-bedroom, and studio units.

The staff report indicated that the applicant has not applied for a DCL waiver, but can do so at a later time.

“If the DCL waiver is taken, the value of the City-wide DCL waiver on the residential floor area would be approximately $2,357,903,” the staff report stated.

The rezoning application is included in the public hearing agenda of city council on Thursday (March 3).

Here's how much it costs to rent a one-bedroom apartment in Metro Vancouver this March

Vancouver continues to see the most expensive rent in the country.
vancouver-downtown-view-2022
Metro Vancouver, BC rental prices have increased slightly this month over last but some neighbourhoods are lighter on your wallet in March 2022.

Residents of Metro Vancouver who are looking to score cheap rent may feel slightly deflated about this month's average apartment prices. 

While prices haven't taken an enormous leap this month over last, March prices have increased slightly for the region and the City of Vancouver continues to see the highest rent in Canada.

Metro Vancouver's rental prices for unfurnished, one-bedroom apartments have increased by $16 from $1,840 to $1,856 finds Liv.rent, a rental platform based in Vancouver and creates monthly rent reports for the region.

The City of Vancouver continues to see the highest rent of Canada's big cities, with average rents for unfurnished, one-bedroom apartments going for $2,039 in March. But report authors note that "most of the major price increases came from outside Vancouver itself, where rent prices remained largely the same this month. Areas like Langley, Coquitlam and North Vancouver saw comparatively significant gains this month, particularly for unfurnished, one-bedroom units."

Another B.C. city, Victoria, has the second-highest rent in the country, with average listings selling for $1,835. Toronto follows in third, with unfurnished units selling for an average of $1,772. Ottawa rounded out the top fourth, with rentals averaging $1,660. 

Across the region, there has been only one month out of the past six where prices declined on the aggregate, and that was a mere $4 drop from December to January.

average-rent-unfurnished-march-2022.jpg
Photo via liv.rent

Metro Vancouver rent by city/municipality

Vancouver residents spend an average of 32.17 per cent of their income on rent, which Liv.rent notes is just above what financial advisors recommend spending. 

Surrey is the least expensive city for unfurnished one-bedroom listings, at an average of just $1,449 this month. Langley follows, with average unfurnished one-bedroom units costing $1,641. New Westminster had the third-best market, with one-bedroom apartments averaging $1,712. 

North Vancouver has the most expensive unfurnished one-bedroom apartments this month, with rentals costing an average of $2,210. West Vancouver has the second-highest rentals, with one-bedrooms costing an average of $2,040 this month. Vancouver came third, with one-bedroom apartments costing $2,039.

municipality.jpg
Photo via liv.rent

This month, Downtown Vancouver is the most expensive neighbourhood to rent an unfurnished, one-bedroom unit, at $2,327. Mount Pleasant and Fairview aren’t far behind, at $2,227 and $2,216 respectively.

neighbourhood-listings.jpg
Photo via liv.rent

Where are the cheapest neighbourhoods to rent in Metro Vancouver? Have a look at this rental map to find the lowest price listings in the region.



Vancouver renters need to work 48 hours more per month to keep housing cost at 30 percent of income

by Carlito Pablo on February 28th, 2022

Real-estate company rennie notes that the rental vacancy rate in the Lower Mainland is a low 1.2 percent.CMHC

It’s not uncommon to hear about people working extra jobs to make their rent.

A Canada Mortage and Housing Corporation report calculates how much more hours an individual has to do over full-time employment to keep rent affordable.

By affordable, the CMHC explains that it’s a dwelling where a renter household spends no more than 30 percent of gross income on rent.

Full-time work is 37.5 hours per week or 150 hours a month.

CMHC’s calculation also assumes that an individual is earning the average wage in their respective urban centre, and lives in a two-bedroom apartment.

Hence, metropolitan areas in Canada that show more than 150 hours required for the 30 percent affordability measure “implies that the average rent is not affordable for a single average wage earner without another source of income, even if they work full time”.

Guess which urban centre topped CMHC’s list of unaffordable places?

It’s Metro Vancouver, with Victoria following second.

The CMHC list shows that residents in Greater Vancouver have to work a total of 198 hours per month to keep their rental cost affordable or at the 30 percent mark.

This means doing 48 hours more over the full-time employment of 150 hours.

In Victoria, it’s 162.6 hours per month.

In its report, CMHC noted that major urban centres in B.C. and Ontario are “above 150 hours, indicating significant rental affordability challenges in these markets”.

The agency noted that data in its report indicates that “rent growth has exceeded wage growth” in most urban centres in the country.

As for Metro Vancouver, CMHC stated that “lower-income households face significant challenges in finding units that they can afford”.

For instance, less than one-fourth or 25 percent of purpose-built market rental units are affordable to households earning less than $48,000 in annual income.

A yearly income of $48,000 means that with a 30 percent affordability measure, a household’s rent should be $1,200 per month.

Moreover, CMHC reported that only one in 1,000 units in Metro Vancouver is affordable to households with the lowest incomes.

“Most of the lowest-priced units are small and unsuitable for families,” CMHC noted.

The CMHC report was released in February 2022, and is based on data as of October 2021.

The agency reported that the average rent for a two-bedroom unit in a purpose-built rental building in Metro Vancouver is $1,824 per month as of last fall.

This means that rent in the region increased by 2.4 percent compared to October 2020.

Vancouver real estate company rennie took a look at the housing agency’s report, and highlighted a number of points.

In its own report, rennie noted that Metro Vancouver continues to have the lowest purpose-built rental vacancy rate among major Canadian markets at 1.2 percent.

The national vacancy rate is 3.1 percent.

The 2021 vacancy rate of 1.2 percent in Metro Vancouver represents a tightening from the previous 2.6 percent in 2020.

“The return of international students, elevated immigration flows, and robust domestic in-migration each played a role in the market’s tightening,” rennie stated in its report.

The Vancouver real estate company also noted that while rental rates were frozen for existing tenants, rates increased by 1.9 percent overall “due to both the turnover of units and the addition of new units to the existing stock”.

And as the vacancy rate in Metro Vancouver fell, the average monthly rent increased by 1.9 percent between 2020 and 2021 to $1,537.

“The average rent for studios rose by 3.4% (driven by the chase for affordability), while that of three-bedroom homes rose by 5.4% (driven by the chase for space),” rennie reported.

For more details, see table below.
CMHC table shows hours of work needed per month to keep monthly rent at 30 percent of gross income for a two-bedroom purpose-built rental apartment.


RELATED STORIES

More than half of Canadians can't keep up with cost of living: survey

Daniel Otis
CTVNews.ca Writer
Published Monday, February 28, 2022 


More than half of Canadians say they can’t keep up with the cost of living, according to a new survey from the Angus Reid Institute.
(Ketut Subiyanto/Pexels)

More than half of Canadians say they can’t keep up with the cost of living, according to a new survey from the Angus Reid Institute. The survey also found that seven in ten Canadians report being stressed about money as inflation rates continue to grow.

“Canadians’ household budgets are becoming squeezed from all angles as the price of goods rises,” the report from Angus Reid says. “The costs of food, gasoline, and energy in particular are adding to household bills.”

In January 2022, Canada’s annual inflation rate reached 5.1 per cent, which outpaced wage increases of 2.4 per cent over the same period. According to Statistics Canada, this was the first time the annual inflation rate exceeded five per cent in more than 30 years.

Related Stories
How interest rate hikes could affect your mortgage payment
More Canadians worried about retirement as home prices, inflation rise
What-flation? As inflation rate passes five per cent, a primer on some adjacent words
Annual inflation rate tops 5 per cent for first time in 30 years

With rising housing, gasoline and grocery prices driving inflation, the Angus Reid survey found that 53 per cent of respondents reported not being able to keep up with the rising cost of living. When it comes to emergency expenses, 51 per cent reported they would be unable to cover an unexpected $1,000 bill, including 14 per cent who said they couldn’t manage an emergency expense of any kind.

Published Monday, the survey found that money was a source of stress for 70 per cent of respondents, which was more than double the 28 per cent who said it never bothers them. To stretch their dollars further, three-quarters of respondents said they had modified their buying habits in recent months by cutting back on discretionary spending, big purchases, extra car trips or vacations. More than one in five said they have deprioritized savings.

Households with children appear to be feeling particular financial pressure, and were more likely to report cutting back on spending and savings. Nearly 40 per cent of parents said they face challenges paying for child care.

Debt is also worrying Canadians, with 36 per cent of respondents saying they have too much of it. That number climbed to about half of respondents in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Alberta. People in Canada’s western provinces were also more likely to be concerned about unemployment, with at least two in five saying they are worried someone in their household could lose their job.

The findings were based on an online survey of 1,622 Canadian adults. The Angus Reid Institute is a national not-for-profit that conducts opinion polls and research on issues affecting Canadians.

With files from the Canadian Press
'Atmosphere on steroids': climate change report says Atlantic Canada will be hit hard



Bruce Frisko
CTV News Atlantic Reporter and Host
Published March 1, 2022 

A sweeping new report on climate change around the world says fisheries and related industries in Atlantic Canada are in jeopardy unless drastic action is taken to reverse the trends.

The report, released Monday reveals Canada is warming at a rate twice the world average and costs are already piling up.

"Right now, we're not on track to achieving a climate resilient future," said Sherilee Harper, the Canada Research Chair in Climate Change and Health and an associate professor in the School of Public Health at University of Alberta in Edmonton.


One of 330 experts who authored the report, Harper says gradual changes in industries like fishing are speeding-up.

"And how different fisheries will be impacted differentially, where fish will be moving into in the future, and how that impacts our livelihoods and our economy and our nutrition," she said.

World leaders demanded action during an online press conference moderated from Berlin Monday.

"I've seen many scientific reports in my time, but nothing like this," said UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

"With fact upon fact, this report reveals how people on the planet are getting clobbered with climate change. Nearly half of humanity is living in the danger zone, now. Many ecosystems are at the point of no return, now," Guterres said.

"The facts are undeniable. This abdication of leadership is criminal."

"Our atmosphere today is on steroids — doped with fossil fuels," said World Meteorological Organization Secretary-General Patteri Taala.

The federal Green Party called for a redoubling of efforts to fight climate change in light of the report.

"Of all the threats facing Canada — and all of humanity — the climate crisis is the most urgent and the one for which government action falls so badly short of what is needed. This is a failure of leadership on a grand scale," said interim Green Leader Dr. Amita Kuttner, in a news release.

With concerns about rising sea levels, CTV News reached out to Develop Nova Scotia to inquire about strategies to deal with the problem.

The interview request was declined, but in a late afternoon email, senior communications officer Kelly Rose provided a response in point form:
Develop Nova Scotia is one among many agencies and organizations, all working together, to look at climate change and how it impacts on the projects we undertake around the province.
Develop Nova Scotia is one among many agencies and organizations, all working together, to look at climate change and how it impacts on the projects we undertake around the province.
From a Develop Nova Scotia perspective, all current projects (and new infrastructure) planned, designed, and built with climate adaptation in mind. In addition, sustainability is included in our procurement processes so that Develop Nova Scotia understand our consultants and contractor’s approach to climate change mitigation during the planning, design and construction of projects.
Developers, consultants we work with, and the city, province and federal governments, are all cognizant of rising sea levels, storm surge and storm frequency associated with climate change, and how that should direct the design of new waterfront buildings, infrastructure and improvements to existing property to increase its resiliency.
Coastal resilience is key in our projects and in working with community. As an example, climate change, sea level rise, and storm surges were identified as an increasing risk to Peggy’s Cove. The raising of the road, oversized new culverts and the reconstruction of the community breakwater are all measures to adapt to the impacts of climate change and make structures more resilient. A coastal study, including storm modeling and LiDAR data, helped to formulate the solutions, location and designs.

 

On the Halifax waterfront, the newly Foundation Project removed derelict wharves and reconstructed gently elevated boardwalks and wharves with shoreline protection installed to both adapt to sea level rise and mitigate the impact of wave action and storm frequency, while keeping accessibility at the centre of our design objectives.

On the Halifax waterfront Tuesday, Shaun Binger, visiting from Ontario, suggested more needs to be done to protect the city, the country and the planet.

"We've got to concentrate on our environment, and the governments have to do more," he said.


New IPCC report: we are not prepared for what is coming


Greenpeace International28 February 2022 •


Geneva, Switzerland – In the most comprehensive assessment of climate impacts yet, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Working Group II report delivered their latest scientific assessment to world governments today.

Focusing on impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, the report lays out, in sobering detail, how severe the impacts of climate change already are, causing widespread losses and damages to people and ecosystems around the world, projected to escalate with every bit of further warming.

Kaisa Kosonen, Senior Policy Advisor, Greenpeace Nordic said:
“The report makes very painful reading. But only by facing these facts head on, with brutal honesty, can we find solutions that match the scale of the interconnected challenges.

“It’s all hands on deck now! We need to do everything faster and bolder, at all levels, and leave no one behind. The rights and needs of those in most vulnerable conditions must be placed at the heart and center of climate action. This is the moment to rise up, think big and unite.”

Thandile Chinyavanhu, Climate and Energy Campaigner, Greenpeace Africa said:
“For many, the climate emergency is already a matter of life or death, as homes and futures are on the line. This is the lived reality of the communities of Mdantsane that have lost loved ones and their life possessions and for the residents of Qwa qwa unable to access vital health services or school as a result of extreme weather. But we will fight this together. We will go out on the streets, we will go to court, united for justice and we will hold to account those whose actions have disproportionately damaged our planet. They broke it, now they have to fix it.”

Louise Fournier, Legal Counsel – Climate Justice and Liability, Greenpeace International, said:
“With this new IPCC report, governments and corporations have no choice but to act in line with science to meet their human rights obligations. If they won’t, they will be met in court. Communities made vulnerable by climate change will continue to vindicate their human rights, demand justice and hold those responsible to account. In the last year, an unprecedented number of key decisions with far-reaching impacts were issued. Just like the cascading impacts of climate, all of these climate cases are connected and reinforce a global standard that climate protection is a human right.”

Onboard a scientific expedition to the Antarctic, Laura Meller, Greenpeace’s Protect The Oceans Campaign, said:
“One solution is right in front of us: healthy oceans are key to reducing the impacts of climate breakdown. We don’t want any more words, we need action. Governments must agree on a strong Global Ocean Treaty at the United Nations next month to enable the protection of at least 30% of the world’s oceans by 2030. If we protect the oceans, they’ll protect us.”

Li Shuo, Global Policy Advisor, Greenpeace East Asia, said:
“​Our natural world is being threatened like never before. That is not the future we deserve and governments must respond to the latest science with action this year at the UN Biodiversity Summit, by committing to protecting at least 30% of land and oceans by 2030.”

Since the previous assessment, climate risks are appearing faster and will get more severe sooner. The IPCC finds that mortality from floods, drought and storms was a staggering 15 times higher in highly vulnerable regions during the last decade, compared to regions with very low vulnerability. The report also acknowledges the crucial importance of fighting the interconnected climate and nature crisis together. Only by protecting and restoring ecosystems can we build their resilience towards warming, and protect all their services human well-being depends on.

The report will define climate politics, whether leaders want it or not. Last year in Glasgow at the UN climate summit, governments admitted they’re not doing nearly enough to meet the Paris Climate Agreement 1.5°C warming limit, agreeing to revisit their national targets by the end of 2022. The next climate summit, COP27 in Egypt later this year, is where countries will have to also address today’s updated IPCC findings on the growing gap on adaptation, on loss and damage, and deep injustices.

The Working Group II contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment will be followed by the contribution of the Working Group III in April, which will assess ways to mitigate climate change.The full story of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report will then be brought together by the Synthesis Report in October.

ENDS

See our independent briefing with Key Takeaways from the IPCC WGII report on Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (AR6 WG2).

Images: Images and videos of climate change impacts are available from the Greenpeace Media Library.


Nfld. & Labrador

Nurses' union, N.L. government team up to address staffing shortages

'We have reached a pivotal time in nursing in our province and across the country,' says union president

Furey says he wants to ensure there's a collaborative approach to closing gaps in the health-care system. (Jeremy Eaton/CBC)

The government of Newfoundland and Labrador says it's looking outside Canada address the province's nursing shortage.

Yvette Coffey, president of the Registered Nurses' Union Newfoundland and Labrador, said Tuesday that nurses and nurse practitioners have reported high rates of burnout and mental health deterioration over the course of the pandemic due to workloads and short staffs.

"We have reached a pivotal time in nursing in our province and across the country," said Coffey at a news conference Tuesday with the premier and provincial health minister. "Across the country and around the world some nurses are making the heart-wrenching decision to leave nursing all together or to retire early due to the conditions they face."

The provincial government is ushering in a $420,000 bursary program to attract internationally educated nurses to a bridging program offered by the Centre for Nursing Studies. Forty-two spots are available and the program takes 12-18 months to complete, followed by a four-month on-site practical component. 

The program will allow nurses to address any requirement gaps for Canadian nursing credentials not covered by their international training.

But there are more than 600 vacant registered nursing positions across the province right now, Coffey said, making the bursary program a small part of the solution.

Finding solutions

Early next month, the provincial government is hosting a virtual think tank to consult the province's registered nurses and come up with a plan to address challenges facing the profession.

The goal is to find short-term measures to improve the workplace and the retention and recruitment of registered nurses and nurse practitioners in Newfoundland and Labrador. The provincial government is also gathering information for a report that will be used as the basis for recommendations for the new recruitment and retention office for health-care professionals.

From left, Registered Nurses' Union Newfoundland and Labrador president Yvette Coffey, Furey and provincial Health Minister John Haggie on Tuesday outlined steps they're taking to address the province's nursing shortage. (Jeremy Eaton/CBC)

"Collaboration is what's needed to turn the tide for nursing in Newfoundland and Labrador," Coffey said. 

"For the first time ever our province will have a government office dedicated to the recruitment and retention of health-care professionals. We look forward to working with officials from this office to continue efforts to create healthier workplaces, address violence in health care and stabilize the work force." 

The province is also issuing three requests for proposals this week to dig into the challenges of the nursing workforce. 

One will focus on understanding the shift in the workforce including the inability to fill permanent positions. Another looks to develop a health and human resources plan to ensure the province is providing appropriate care for residents.

The final request for proposals is for a nursing core staff review to analyze core staffing methods and provide recommendations for improvement. 

"As a government and as a former surgeon I understand the issues that nurses face. I've worked side by side, arm in arm with nurses every day of my life," said Premier Andrew Furey on Tuesday. 

"I understand that the system was broken before the pandemic. There has been a huge exposure of gaps because of the pandemic, and I want to make sure that we're working collaboratively to ensure that we're closing those gaps."

The PC opposition says it welcomes the steps the provincial government but criticized the timing of Tuesday's announcement.

In a media release, PC Leader David Brazil noted the Liberal government already announced the request for proposals for the human resources plan in October and committed to a nursing core staffing review in 2019.

"Health-care recruiters from elsewhere in Canada continue to attract our health-care professionals elsewhere. Now there's another plan to make a plan. Patients need action today," Brazil said.

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

With files from Jeremy Eaton