Tuesday, March 29, 2022



Defense Acquisition Trends 2021

March 29, 2022

 

 

Defense Acquisition Trends 2021 is the latest in an annual series of report examining trends in what the DoD is buying, how the DoD is buying it, and whom the DoD is buying from. This report analyzes the current state of affairs in defense acquisition by combining detailed policy and data analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of the current and future outlook for defense acquisition. This analysis will provide critical insights into what the DoD is buying, how the DoD is buying it, from whom the is DoD buying, and what the defense components are buying using data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). This analysis provides critical insights into understanding the current trends in the defense-industrial base and the implications of those trends on acquisition policy.

This report is made possible by general support to CSIS. No direct sponsorship contributed to this report.

LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for PERMANENT ARMS ECONOMY 


Nvidia is the most important tech company on planet: analyst


·Anchor, Editor-at-Large

Step aside Apple and Google, Nvidia may be the new king of tech, one analyst contends.

"Nvidia may be the most important technology company today," said Evercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse in a new note on Monday. The analyst reiterated an Outperform rating on Nvidia with a $375 price target.

Shares of Nvidia rose slightly in afternoon trading Monday to $277.

Muse's upbeat take on Nvidia comes hot on the heels of the company's closely watched GTC conference, where it held nearly 1,000 sessions that included more than 1,600 speakers.

"Beyond having best-in class hardware accelerator solutions with its GPUs, Nvidia is broadening its portfolio and deepening its expertise across DPUs and CPUs, along with other areas such as connectivity and interconnects to put all of the pieces together. Then to ensure these complex solutions run seamlessly, Nvidia is continuing to pioneer software both at the foundational level and application specific level — which is key to the company’s TAM [total addressable market] expansion and the overall democratization of AI. Events like GTC hammer these point home, with various customers and ecosystem partners highlighting the advancements they are driving along with NVDA, and clear roadmaps for continued growth for the next decade plus," Muse explained.

One area Nvidia is doubling down on is its autonomous driving platform.

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - JANUARY 08: Cameras are visible on the exterior of an Nvidia self-driving car inside the Nvidia booth during CES 2019 at the Las Vegas Convention Center on January 8, 2019 in Las Vegas, Nevada. CES, the world's largest annual consumer technology trade show, runs through January 11 and features about 4,500 exhibitors showing off their latest products and services to more than 180,000 attendees. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

At Nvidia's conference last week, CEO Jensen Huang touted the company’s $11 billion vehicle-tech order pipeline over the next six years.

“Automotive will surely be our next multibillion-dollar business,” Huang told Julie Hyman and Dan Howley in a Yahoo Finance Presents interview. “The $11 billion is going to be quite a significant business for us just in the car. But if you look at the totality of AV, I think this is going to be one of the largest AI industries in the world.”

During the conference, Nvidia put the potential market for auto-related software, hardware and data-center services at $300 billion.

Points out Evercore ISI's Muse, "Advancements across in vehicle technologies, data center capabilities, connectivity, and AI/simulation (Omniverse) are enabling a transformation in the automotive industry today, leading to an estimated $2 trillion opportunity from the monetization of car services over the coming decade (largely led by Autonomous Driving and/or Mobility-as-a-Service)."

Canada's Trudeau rebuked by some members of European Parliament for treatment of convoy protesters
THE FASCIST MEMBERS

Jon Brown
FOX NEWS (WHO ELSE)
Sun, March 27, 2022

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau met with scathing rebuke from some Members of European Parliament (MEP) last week after he delivered a speech to the European Union.

Independent Croatian MEP Mislav Kolakusic accused Trudeau of engaging in "dictatorship of the worst kind" because of how his government treated the peaceful Freedom Convoy in February.

"Under your quasi-liberal boot in recent months," said Kolakusic, "we watched how you trample women with horses, how you block the bank accounts of single parents so that they can't even pay their children's education and medicine, that they can't pay utilities, mortgages for their homes."

Alternative for Germany
MEP Christine Anderson also called out Trudeau, calling him "a disgrace for any democracy." AfD A FASCIST PARTY


CANADIAN CLERGY REBUKE TRUDEAU FOR INVOKING EMERGENCIES ACT, OTHER ‘TYRANNICAL ACTIONS’

Another Alternative for Germany MEP, Bernhard Zimniok, echoed Anderson, tweeting, "I'm overwhelmed by the support and appreciation of the Canadian people, which means a lot to me! Because of that, I published the speech with English translation. Unfortunately, the interpreter ignored that I mentioned the freezing of 200 bank accounts."

VIGILS PLANNED AT CANADIAN CONSULATES IN US TO PROTEST IMPRISONMENT OF PASTOR WHO PREACHED TO FREEDOM CONVOY

Romanian MEP Cristian TerheČ™ boycotted Trudeau’s speech entirely.

Trudeau has also faced backlash at home for how he responded to the Freedom Convoy.

Video circulated widely on social media in February of police decked out in riot gear cracking down on convoy protesters in Ottawa by arresting them, tear-gassing them, and deploying officers on horseback through the crowds. One woman was reportedly trampled by a horse, according to footage of the incident.

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau comments on the ongoing truckers mandate protest during a news conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada, on Feb. 14, 2022. Photo by DAVE CHAN/AFP via Getty Images

A group of Canadian clergy sent an open letter to Prime Minister Trudeau last month rebuking him for invoking the Emergencies Act to quell the Freedom Convoy and for other actions they described as "tyrannical."

"We are writing to you as representative pastors of Christian congregations from across the nation and as law-abiding citizens who respect the God-defined role of civil government and uphold the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the highest law of our land, which recognizes the supremacy of God over all human legislation," read the letter, which was signed by 29 clergymen.
PERMANENT ARMS ECONOMY
The Air Force wants more money to research hypersonic weapons, but not buy them … yet




Stephen Losey
Mon, March 28, 2022

WASHINGTON — The Air Force’s budget request for fiscal 2023 calls for more money to research hypersonic weapons, replenish its stocks of guided munitions, buy ship-killing missiles and air-launched cruise missiles, and further develop a next-generation intercontinental ballistic missile.

The budget proposal, which the Biden administration released Monday, seeks to increase spending on developing hypersonic prototyping from the nearly $509 million lawmakers approved in fiscal 2022 to $577 million in 2023.

Air Force Under Secretary Gina Ortiz Jones said the request for more research, development, testing and evaluation dollars for hypersonics shows the service is “committed” to the AGM-183A Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon, or ARRW, and Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile, or HACM, programs.

But the Air Force isn’t planning to procure any ARRWs, which is the service’s leading hypersonic weapon program, in 2023. In a Monday briefing with reporters, Maj. Gen. James Peccia, deputy assistant secretary for budget, said the program is funded through 2023, and the service would reassess the program in future years. Peccia also said a “sliver” of remaining procurement funding for ARRW this year would likely be reallocated for research and development.

The 2022 omnibus spending bill passed by Congress earlier this month struck nearly $161 million that the Pentagon originally asked for to procure ARRWs, and transferred half of that amount to RDT&E. Lawmakers pointed to testing failures and delays that pushed the program back.


The move was made in consultation with the Air Force, Congress said. Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has in recent months repeatedly said the service needs to ask hard questions about the role hypersonics should play in the Air Force’s arsenal and if they are cost-effective for the targets the United States might want to strike.

“ARRW still has to prove itself,” Kendall said at a conference in Washington March 9.


Meanwhile, the Air Force’s Ground Based Strategic Deterrent program, the service’s effort to develop a next-generation intercontinental ballistic missile to replace the aging Minuteman III, would also receive a $1.1 billion increase, to more than $3.6 billion in 2023. Northrop Grumman was awarded the contract for GBSD in 2020. The Air Force said this increase would keep it on track to reach initial operating capability in 2029.

The Air Force also wants to add $128 million to buy 4,200 joint direct attack munitions, or JDAMs, up from the 1,919 the service requested last year. This would bring JDAM procurement funding to $252 million.

Peccia in a March 25 briefing with reporters said the Air Force is now “catching back up” on JDAM production after lower production rates in 2021 and 2022.

The budget would also add $119 million to buy 28 Long-Range Anti Ship Missiles, or LRASMs, which were not funded in the Air Force’s 2022 budget.

And it would provide $785 million, a $74 million increase over the 2022 budget, to buy 550 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile Extended Range cruise missiles. That would be up from the 525 JASSM-ERs in the 2022 budget, and the added money would fund JASSM-ER at maximum production capacity, Peccia said.

The Long-Range Standoff Weapon program would also see a more than 50% increase in funding, going from the $599 million approved in the 2022 omnibus spending bill to $929 million under the 2023 budget request.
Seoul: N. Korea fired old ICBM, not new big one, last week


 This photo distributed by the North Korean government shows what it says is a test-fire of a Hwasong-17 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), at an undisclosed location in North Korea on March 24, 2022. Independent journalists were not given access to cover the event depicted in this image distributed by the North Korean government. The content of this image is as provided and cannot be independently verified. Korean language watermark on image as provided by source reads: "KCNA" which is the abbreviation for Korean Central News Agency. 
(Korean Central News Agency/Korea News Service via AP, File)

HYUNG-JIN KIM
Tue, March 29, 2022

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korea on Tuesday dismissed North Korea’s claim to have launched a newly developed intercontinental ballistic missile last week, accusing the country of firing a less-powerful existing weapon and fabricating data following an earlier failed launch.

North Korea said it launched a Hwasong-17 missile, its longest-range developmental ICBM, last Thursday in its biggest weapons test in years. Its state media called the launch “a historical event” and released a stylized Hollywood-style video showing leader Kim Jong Un, in sunglasses and leather jacket, supervising the launch.

But South Korea’s Defense Ministry said Tuesday it has determined that what North Korea fired wasn’t a Hwasong-17 but a Hwasong-15, another ICBM that it successfully tested in 2017.

Both missiles are potentially capable of reaching the U.S. mainland. But analysts say the Hwasong-17 has a longer potential range and its huge size suggests that it’s designed to carry multiple nuclear warheads to defeat missile defense systems. Believed to be about 25 meters (82 feet) long, the Hwasong-17 is, by some estimates, the world’s biggest road-mobile ballistic missile system.



IT WAS BACKGROUND FOR NEW SPRING FASHION
 WITH NK MODEL KIM

LEATHER JACKET, NEW HAIR CUT, NK RAYBANS, 
NK ROLEX




The Defense Ministry said it told a parliamentary committee that details of Thursday’s launch -- such as the missile’s speed, combustion and stage separation -- were similar to those of the Hwasong-15, not the Hwasong-17. The ministry report to the committee also suggested that the North Korean video wasn’t shot on the actual launch date, citing an analysis of Kim’s shadow and weather conditions seen in the video.

The report said the United States agreed with the South Korean assessment and is separately analyzing the launch.

Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno said Monday that Tokyo’s assessment that North Korea launched a new type of ICBM remained unchanged. Matsuno said the missile poses a greater threat to Japan and the international community than other weapons North Korea has fired.

Thursday’s launch was North Korea’s most serious provocation since its Hwasong-15 launch in November 2017. It was also the latest in a slew of missile tests it has conducted this year in an apparent bid to modernize its arsenal and ramp up pressure on the Biden administration amid stalled nuclear talks between the two countries.

According to the assessments of both North Korea and its neighbors, the missile fired last Thursday flew higher and longer than any other North Korean weapon tested so far. Some experts say North Korea may have mounted a much lighter payload on the Hwasong-15 to help it fly further than its previous launch in 2017.

The South Korean Defense Ministry said the alleged North Korean deception was likely related to a previous failed attempt to launch the Hwasong-17 earlier this month.

According to South Korean accounts, the missile fired from North Korea’s capital region on March 16 exploded soon after liftoff and many residents of Pyongyang witnessed the mid-air blast. The ministry report said North Korea is believed to have then decided to launch a reliable ICBM which it could successfully fly to prevent possible public anxiety and bolster unity at home.

It said it is also likely that North Korea attempted to deceive its rivals into believing it has advanced ICBM technology to cement its image as a military power and increase its leverage in future negotiations.

Ha Tae-keung, a member of parliament’s defense committee, told reporters that the ministry said the explosion occurred at an altitude of only several kilometers (miles). He cited the ministry as saying the blast “sent debris like rain over Pyongyang” though civilian casualties haven’t been independently confirmed.

Colin Zwirko, a senior analyst at the North Korea-focused website NK Pro, earlier said commercial satellite images indicated that North Korean state TV video of the launch was likely shot on a different date. He said this raises the possibility that North Korea botched a Hwasong-17 test on March 16.

Prior to the failed March 16 launch, the South Korean and U.S. militaries said North Korea tested a Hwasong-17 system twice earlier this year in launches that flew medium distances. Some observers said North Korea was likely testing the first stage of the Hwasong-17, but North Korea said it tested cameras and other systems for a spy satellite without disclosing what missile or rocket it fired. The North didn't comment on the failed launch.

South Korean officials said this week that North Korea may raise tensions further in coming weeks by conducting another ICBM test, a prohibited launch of a rocket to place its first functioning spy satellite into orbit, or even a nuclear test.

North Korean state media didn’t immediately respond to the South Korean Defense Ministry report.

___

Associated Press writer Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed to this report.

Analysts investigate possibility of N.Korea missile test 'deception'


FILE PHOTO: An overview of what state media reports is the launch of the "Hwasong-17" intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM)


Mon, March 28, 2022
By Josh Smith

SEOUL (Reuters) - Reports suggest North Korea's biggest missile test ever may not have been what it seemed, raising new questions over the secretive country's banned weapons programme.

North Korea said it had test-fired its new Hwasong-17 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on Thursday, the first test of a missile that size since 2017.

North Korean state media heralded the launch as an "unprecedented miracle", and South Korean and Japanese officials independently confirmed flight data that showed it flew higher and longer than any previous test.

But new details - including discrepancies spotted in the North's heavily stylized video featuring leader Kim Jong Un overseeing the launch in a leather jacket and sunglasses - have poked holes in Pyongyang's claims.

"The biggest question now is what was launched on March 24," said Colin Zwirko, a senior analytical correspondent with NK Pro, a Seoul-based website that monitors North Korea.

He has examined commercial satellite imagery and footage released by state media and he says discrepancies in weather, sunlight, and other factors suggest the launch shown by North Korea happened on another day.

"I've been able to determine that there's some sort of deception going on, but the question remains: did they test another Hwasong-17 and they're just not showing us, or did they test something else?" Zwirko said.

The U.S.-based James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) concluded that some of the North Korean footage is most likely from a test on the morning of March 16 that South Korea said failed shortly after launch, exploding in midair over Pyongyang. North Korea never acknowledged that launch or a failure.

South Korea's Yonhap news agency has cited unnamed sources who said intelligence officials in Seoul and Washington believed that North Korea then tested a Hwasong-15 ICBM on Thursday, an older and slightly smaller type it had last launched in late 2017.

South Korea's defense ministry has not confirmed that conclusion. On Friday, a senior U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, deflected when asked whether the latest launch was really the new missile.

"We know this is a test of a long-range ballistic missile and clearly they try to learn from each of these tests to try to develop their capability further," the official said. "But I am going to refrain from talking about it too specifically as we're still analyzing our own intelligence on it."

North Korea has a history of doctoring footage or reusing old images, but it would be "a whole new level" if they were lying about the successful test of a major new weapon such as the Hwasong-17, Zwirko said. North Korea has not responded to any outside reports that the launch may have been deceptive.

"I think it's likely that the March 16 launch was meant to have been the inaugural launch of the Hwasong-17, but it failed shortly after ignition," said Ankit Panda, a senior fellow at the U.S.-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "This left the North Koreans with sufficient video footage and imagery to build a propaganda narrative after the March 24 launch succeeded."

The March 24 missile may have featured a light payload, or none at all, to achieve a higher altitude and longer flight time than the 2017 Hwasong-15 test, he added.

"The North Korean state media report included specific numbers on how high and far the missile flew, suggesting that there was an intent to engineer a launch that would look like a larger missile than the Hwasong-15, even if it wasn't," Panda said.

Hong Min, director of North Korean Research Division of Korea Institute for National Unification in Seoul, said no matter which ICBM was tested, North Korea has proved it can launch missiles that can strike the far side of the planet.

"We will need to check thoroughly if the video was fabricated, but it’s not like the threat is reduced at all," Hong said.

(Reporting by Josh Smith; Additional reporting by Phil Stewart in Washington and Heejung Jung in Seoul. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
Hungary rights groups urge invalid votes to defeat Orban's LGBTQ referendum

Activists shape two Xs with white canvas to encourage Hungarians to place an invalid ballot at a Fidesz proposed referendum on April 3rd


Mon, March 28, 2022, 5:46 AM·3 min read
By Krisztina Fenyo and Krisztina Than

BUDAPEST (Reuters) - Hungarian human rights groups are urging voters to spoil their ballots to defeat a government referendum on LGBTQ issues taking place alongside a national election on Sunday, saying its approval would strengthen prejudice against the LGBTQ community.

Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a nationalist facing a tough battle to be re-elected for a fourth consecutive term, has proposed a referendum on ruling party legislation that limits schools' teaching about homosexuality and transgender issues.

The referendum is seen as a riposte to the European Commission, which launched legal action against Budapest over the law - passed last year - that bans the use of materials seen as promoting homosexuality and gender change at schools, ostensibly as a measure to prevent child abuse.

Brussels said it was discriminatory and contravened European values of tolerance and individual freedom.

Orban, who has sought to promote social policies that he says safeguard Christian values against Western liberalism, put gender issues and what he calls LGBTQ propaganda in schools at the forefront of his campaign.

Although Russia's invasion of neighbouring Ukraine has since taken centrestage in the run-up to the April 3 election, the referendum remains a key plank of Orban's policies aimed at mobilising his Fidesz party voters.

"We are united and therefore we will also win the referendum with which we will stop at our borders the gender madness sweeping across the Western world," Orban told a rally on March 15.

'PROPAGANDA REFERENDUM'


While the message resonates with conservative voters, rights groups protested on Sunday, holding up two giant "X" shaped signs in Budapest to urge people to cast invalid votes at the referendum by marking each question on their paper twice. The proposal cannot be deemed valid without at least 50% of the electorate casting a valid vote.

"This discriminating propaganda referendum ... only further strengthens the division in society and increases prejudices against LGBTQ people," said Luca Dudits, a spokesperson of rights group Hatter Tarsasag, as she was handing out campaign leaflets in the town of Veszprem.

As people stopped to read the activists' leaflets, some agreed with Orban's stance.

"I would not like my grandchildren to undergo gender modification. Girls should stay girls, boys should be boys," said Jozsef M. Nagy, when asked how he would vote.

In the referendum, Hungarians will be asked whether they support the holding of sexual orientation workshops in schools without parents' consent and whether they believe gender reassignment procedures should be promoted among children.

They will also be asked whether media content that could affect sexual orientation should be shown to children without any restrictions.

The government has said it wanted to stop what it called LGBTQ propaganda in schools carried out with the help of NGOs, in order to protect children.

"Lets not infect our children. They want to go into schools, and organise those things, you know," a conservative voter, Laszlo Korona said.

But other passers-by said referendum was wasting taxpayers' money on a non-existent problem created by the government.

"Certain parts of the society have been fooled with this and now they think it is a real problem," Margit Rozsa said.

(Reporting by Krisztina Fenyo and Krisztina Than; Editing by Alex Richardson)
YEP IT'S EVERGREEN AGAIN
Attempt to free grounded Ever Forward set for Tuesday


Crews dredge near the container ship Ever Forward in efforts to free it after it ran aground off the coast near Pasadena, Md., Monday, March 21, 2022. The ship isn't blocking navigation in the channel, unlike last year's high-profile grounding in the Suez Canal of its sister vessel, the Ever Given, which disrupted the global supply chain for days.
 (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)


Mon, March 28, 2022, 2:34 PM·2 min read

BALTIMORE (AP) — Crews will try to refloat a container ship that has been stranded in the Chesapeake Bay for more than two weeks, the U.S. Coast Guard said Monday.

The Coast Guard, Maryland Department of the Environment and Evergreen Marine Corp. will make an initial attempt to refloat the Ever Forward at noon Tuesday, according to a news release issued Monday. A salvage company began dredging around the more than 1,000-foot (305-meter) container ship March 20 and weather last week delayed operations slightly, officials said.

At noon, officials will extend the current 500-yard (457-meter) safety zone around the ship to 1,000 yards (914 meters), closing the navigation channel to commercial traffic until midnight. In addition to regular fuel and ballast tank checks, a naval architect aboard the Ever Forward is monitoring the ship’s stability, an effort that will continue during the operation to refloat the ship, officials said.

If the ship isn’t refloated Tuesday, dredging will start again and a second attempt will be made Sunday, officials said.

A marine safety information bulletin giving notice of the temporary safety zone around the ship, states that the first effort will involve five tug boats and if a second attempt is needed, two anchored pulling barges will be added. If both attempts are unsuccessful, the removal of containers will have to begin, the bulletin states.

The ship operated by Taiwan-based Evergreen Marine Corp. was headed from the Port of Baltimore to Norfolk, Virginia, on March 13 when it ran aground north of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, the U.S. Coast Guard said. Officials have said there were no reports of injuries, damage or pollution.

The Coast Guard has said they have not yet determined what caused the Ever Forward to run aground. The ship ran aground outside the shipping channel and has not been blocking navigation, unlike last year’s high-profile grounding in the Suez Canal of its sister vessel, the Ever Given, which disrupted the global supply chain for days.

China's Big Tech firms are sending congratulation notes for 'graduating' to employees they're laying off

Workers at JD.com and Bilibili are getting retrenchment notices disguised as congratulatory notes for them on having “graduated” from the companies. Here, a worker sorts packages for delivery ahead of the Singles Day shopping festival which falls on November 11, at a JD.com warehouse in Beijing on November 9, 2021.
Workers at JD.com and Bilibili are getting retrenchment notices disguised as congratulatory notes for them on having “graduated” from the companies. Here, a worker sorts packages for delivery ahead of the Singles Day shopping festival which falls on November 11, at a JD.com warehouse in Beijing on November 9, 2021.Jade Gao/AFP via Getty Images
  • Chinese social media users are sharing images reportedly from two tech giants saluting laid-off workers for "graduating."

  • The job cuts come as China's tech giants grapple with Beijing's crackdown on the sector.

  • Experts said that the firms are trying to protect their reputation as more workers get axed.

China's most influential tech companies are laying off workers — and congratulating them on the job loss.

After news broke last week that e-commerce giant JD.com was axing workers, some social media users in China started sharing images of a cheery note titled "Graduation notice" reportedly issued by the company's human resources department.

The JD.com note, which has been verified to Insider by a source, is generically addressed to an unnamed employee, or "JDer." It reads: "Happy graduation! Congratulations for having graduated from JD.com! Thank you for the companionship!"

A similar note reportedly from video-streaming site Bilibili is titled "Bilibili Graduation Day", and writes: "We've prepared this to assist you in embarking on the next phase of your career."

Both notes then go on to list what the recipients can expect to facilitate their departure from their respective ex-employers.

A JD.com spokesperson declined to comment. Bilibili did not immediately respond to Insider's queries.

Some social media users in China expressed disbelief at how these companies are framing the layoffs.

"Isn't it ridiculous that you are congratulating someone that you've laid off?" a user wrote on China's Twitter-like Weibo.

In recent months, several major Chinese tech companies including JD.com's competitor Alibaba, gaming giant Tencent, and short-video app Kuaishou, have been axing thousands of employees.

Layoffs in the sector are common, but this round of job cuts comes amid Beijing's tightening scrutiny on its homegrown tech firms. Since late 2020, China's central government has been ratcheting up its scrutiny of labor and consumer rights issues in the sector, launched antitrust probes against tech companies, and increased oversight on data security.

"China's largest tech companies are now in fat-trimming mode. We've all been expecting these layoffs," said a Shenzhen-based tech-sector headhunter who did not wish to be named. Shenzhen has often been held up as China's Silicon Valley.

The tech firms may be looking to find any way to put a positive spin on mass layoffs, as younger Chinese workers wonder if a career in the tech sector is worth it, news site Sixth Tone reported.

Calling the layoffs "graduation" and congratulating affected employees "seem to be some form of damage control, especially to mitigate negative backlashes from potential disgruntled employees," said Adrian Goh, cofounder of Singapore-based recruitment portal NodeFlair which has been placing job seekers in roles at several internet companies.

"It's the harsh reality of job redundancy masquerading as something that's good and aspirational," said the Shenzhen-based recruiter.

WAIT, WHAT?!

New drug that prevents you from catching COVID-19 gets green light in Europe — but it’s been in the U.S. for months and hardly anyone knows about it

British-Swedish pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca announced on Monday its antibody drug Evusheld, which is taken pre-emptively to prevent COVID-19, has been approved in the European Union.

The treatment, administered in two injections, can be taken by adults and adolescents above the age of 12. In clinical trials, the drug reduced the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 by 77% compared to the placebo, the company said in a statement.

Unlike other antibody treatments, which are used after someone contracts COVID-19 to prevent severe illness, Evusheld would be used as an alternative vaccination for people who had a weak immune response to existing COVID-19 vaccines or for whom vaccination is not recommended, such as the immunocompromised.

In a second analysis six months into the Phase 3 trial of Evusheld—which includes a 150mg dose of tixagevimab and 150mg of cilgavimab administered as two separate sequential injections—those who took the drug saw their risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 drop by 83% compared to those who'd taken a placebo.

The company also said Evusheld specifically targeted and neutralized antibodies from Omicron and its subsequent BA.2 variant, which is now dominant across Europe and the U.S.

Christoph D. Spinner, pandemic officer at the University Hospital Rechts der Isar, said, “the authorization of Evusheld for a broad population will allow health authorities in the EU to identify the populations who are most at-risk and need additional protection.”

Confusion overseas

Evusheld was authorized by the Food and Drug Administration on Feb. 2, 2022 for emergency use in the U.S. and has also been granted conditional marketing authorization in the U.K.

But while the protection it offers from getting COVID-19 is widely accepted, around 80% of the available Evusheld doses sit unused in warehouses, pharmacies and hospitals, according to the New York Times.

In the U.S., there has been confusion surrounding the drug, with patients and doctors not knowing about the drug’s existence or where they can even find it. Some doctors and providers also don’t know how to prescribe the drug due to its confusing relationship to other antibody therapies that are usually taken after contracting COVID-19.

“The biggest problem is that there is absolutely no guidance or prioritization or any rollout in place at all, and it’s been a mess,” Dr. Dorry Segev, a transplant surgeon and epidemiologist at N.Y.U. Langone Health, said in the New York Times.

"For people who did everything they could but didn't have an adequate response to the vaccines, [Evusheld] is their only hope, and to deny them that because of a disorganized and chaotic distribution and education rollout is just terrible," Sergev said to CNN.

The Biden administration purchased 1.7 million doses of Evusheld in January—enough to fully treat 850,000 people—and made 650,000 doses ready for distribution to the states. But of those 1.7 million doses only 370,000 have been have been ordered by the states, and fewer than a quarter of those doses have been used.

A CNN investigation identified 59 pharmacies that had ordered Evusheld. Of the 5,372 boxes they had been delivered, only 1,376 boxes had been used.

Distributing Evusheld in the EU will likely require a smoother rollout to avoid the poor uptake it has experienced in the U.S. "We will continue to work with governments across Europe to make Evusheld available as quickly as possible," Mene Pangalos, executive vice president of biopharmaceuticals research and development at AstraZeneca said.

Otherwise, the immunocompromised waiting for a silver bullet may be left waiting.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Trump speaks out during war in Ukraine to call on Putin to release Hunter Biden dirt


Andrew Feinberg
Tue, March 29, 2022

Five years and eight months after he asked Russia to release damaging information on former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump still hopes Russia is listening.

In an interview with right-wing publication Just the News, Mr Trump said Russian president Vladimir Putin should release information about a Russian widow’s investment into a company Republicans claim is connected to Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s younger and sole surviving son.

Mr Trump has long claimed Hunter Biden received a $3.5m payment from Elena Baturina, the widow of late Moscow mayor Yuri Luzhkov, and has suggested – without evidence – that such a payment was intended to curry favour with the elder Mr Biden for corrupt purposes.

Mr Trump told Just the News Mr Putin should release information the matter, which he also tried raising at his first debate with Joe Biden.

“She gave him $3.5 million so now I would think Putin would know the answer to that. I think he should release it,” he said. “I think we should know that answer.”

A report prepared by Senate Republicans to aid Mr Trump’s re-election campaign alleged Hunter Biden received the $3.5m pursuant to a “consultancy agreement” through a firm called Rosemont Seneca Thorton.

While Hunter Biden was a co-founder and CEO of an investment firm called Rosemont Seneca Advisors, his attorney, George Mesires, has said Mr Biden has no connection to Rosemont Seneca Thorton, and it’s not known what, if any, connection exists between the two companies.

Mr Trump has frequently sought foreign assistance to damage his perceived political enemies.

In July 2016, he infamously called on Russia’s government to release emails he claimed Ms Clinton was withholding to prevent discovery of damaging information about her.

Speaking at a press conference at his Doral, Florida golf resort, he said: "Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let’s see if that happens”.

Nearly three years later, he tried blackmailing Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky into announcing a sham investigation into Hunter Biden’s work as a board member for Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

At the time, Mr Zelensky’s armed forces were battling against Russian-backed separatists in Eastern Ukraine, and the newly-elected Ukrainian president asked Mr Trump to sell Ukraine more Javelin anti-tank missiles to stop Russian tanks.

Mr Trump responded: “I would like you to do us a favour though,” and went on to tell Mr Zelensky to speak with then-attorney general Bill Barr about a conspiracy theory which posited that Joe Biden corruptly withheld US and EU-backed loan guarantees so Mr Zelensky’s predecessor would fire then-prosecutor-general Viktor Shokin because he was allegedly investigating Hunter Biden.

In reality, then-Vice President Biden was carrying out the wishes of the Obama administration as well as the EU and IMF in pushing for the firing of Mr Shokin, who was widely regarded as corrupt. Mr Trump’s attempt at blackmail was later reported to Congress by a whistle-blower, leading to the first of his two impeachment trials.

Mr Trump also told Just the News he would still like to have more information about Hunter Biden’s work with Burisma. The information he seeks may not exist, but he complained that none would be forthcoming because Mr Zelensky is unlikely to take any action to damage Joe Biden while the US is assisting Ukraine fight off the unprovoked invasion Mr Putin launched last month.

“Now, you won't get the answer from Ukraine,” he said.