Saturday, July 25, 2020

US coronavirus cases are probably 10 times higher than the official numbers, more and more research suggests
Aria Bendix

Charles Davis, 49, self-administers a coronavirus test in LA County on July 8, 2020. Al Seib/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images

The true number of coronavirus cases may be more than 10 times higher than official tallies in many parts of the US, a new CDC study found.
MIT researchers estimated last month that US cases were eight times higher than the official tally.
The bulk of underreporting likely happened in March, but testing shortages and delays are still causing some cases to be missed.
Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.


The US has by far the largest coronavirus outbreak in the world, but its 4 million reported infections are a small fraction of the true case total.

A new model from the COVID-19 response team at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that coronavirus cases are probably more than 10 times higher than the total tally in many parts of the country.

The researchers performed antibody tests in 10 sites across the US, including early hotspots like New York City, western Washington, and the San Francisco Bay Area, as well as places with more recent outbreaks, like South Florida and Louisiana. Antibody tests can tell whether someone was previously infected with COVID-19 even if they didn't get diagnosed initially.

The researchers compared the results of those tests, collected from late March through mid-May, to the number of cases reported during that time. They estimated that there were around 1.8 million coronavirus cases across the 10 sites, but only 165,000 infections had been reported. That meant cases were almost 11 times higher than the official number.


Projecting that discrepancy nationwide suggests the US saw 14.4 million infections over the period studied. Just 1.3 million infections were recorded during that time, however, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.

The study joins a slew of similar research that illustrates the degree to which coronavirus cases have been vastly underreported in the US.
Shayanne Gal/Business Insider

"The debate is by how much are cases and deaths undercounted," Dr. Howard Koh, a professor at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, previously told Business Insider. "We probably won't know the real number of deaths and numbers infected until this is all over."

A few studies are coalescing around estimates similar to the CDC's. Research from MIT suggests that around 17.5 million people in the US had gotten COVID-19 by June 18 — around eight times the official number.


And a study published in the journal Science found that the US probably saw around 8.7 million coronavirus cases in the last three weeks of March alone, though only 100,000 were officially counted during that time. That analysis was based on reports of flu-like illnesses from the CDC's influenza surveillance system. The researchers found that many states reported a surge of illnesses in March — about 2.8 million — that weren't attributable to the flu or seasonal respiratory diseases. They think most were coronavirus cases.

That study also suggested that just one-third of coronavirus patients in the US sought medical care in the first place, which would mean the actual surge of coronavirus cases was likely three times larger than those extra documented flu-like cases. That's how they arrived at an estimate of 8.7 million cases in March.

Additionally, a CDC report published Tuesday found that Indiana's true case tally was 10 times higher than the one reported by the end of April.
Underreporting is still a problem
A Quest technician handles coronavirus samples. Quest Diagnostics

The primary reason US numbers are so low is that the country's testing capacity was severely hampered at the beginning of the pandemic. The CDC initially distributed faulty tests, then lingering shortages of accurate tests meant that only patients with severe symptoms were eligible.


This was compounded by the fact that some people may not have known their symptoms were coronavirus-related: In the early days of the pandemic, the CDC only listed three COVID-19 symptoms: a fever, dry cough, and shortness of breath. The agency now associates 11 symptoms with the disease. Plus, many people with mild or asymptomatic cases are unlikely to seek out a test at all.

The US has ramped up testing considerably over the last few months and is now testing 171 out of every 100,000 people each day — a higher per capita rate than in any other country.

But testing delays and shortages are still a problem.

Quest, one of the largest diagnostic testing companies, told Montana officials last week that it couldn't accept new tests for another two to three weeks, the Daily Beast reported. Its average turnaround time for results is now seven days or more, compared to just three or four days in June. A small number of patients may wait up to two weeks.


"Demand for COVID-19 molecular testing continues to outpace Quest's capacity and is highest in the South, Southwest, and West regions of the country," the company said in a press release.

More than 5% of coronavirus tests are coming back positive in 34 states, according to data from Johns Hopkins, and 27 states have seen their positivity rates rise over the last two weeks — a sign that cases are still being missed.

"There could be a lot more people infected than we thought," Elizabeth Halloran, a biostatistician at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, previously told Business Insider. "We'll have to piece it together with the serology afterwards."
Trump talks up his rule-cutting, but courts saying otherwise
By KEVIN FREKING and ELLEN KNICKMEYER

FILE- In this July 24, 2020, file photo President Donald Trump speaks during an event to sign executive orders on lowering drug prices, in the South Court Auditorium in the White House complex in Washington. Trump is working overtime to solidify his image as a champion regulation-cutter in the leadup to the November election. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is positioning himself as a champion regulation-cutter in the leadup to the Nov. 3 election, but in between his showy red-tape-cutting events, his deregulatory agenda is taking a beating in the courts.

One day, he’s hailing a massive rollback to one of the nation’s most important environmental laws, which he hopes will speed up gas pipelines and all kinds of other big projects. Another, he’s holding forth between two pickup trucks being used as props on the South Lawn of the White House — a blue one piled with weights identified as government regulations and a red one, of course, that has been unburdened.

“No other administration has done anywhere near,” Trump declared.

But there’s a sharp disconnect between the president’s muscular rhetoric and the many courtroom battles he’s lost.

Trump’s deregulatory victories have been shrinking in number as courts uphold many of the lawsuits filed by states, environmental groups and others in response to his administration’s sometimes hastily engineered rollbacks.

Just hours before Trump’s South Lawn event, for example, a federal judge reinstated an Obama-era rule that required oil and gas companies operating on public lands to take reasonable measures to stop climate-damaging methane emissions.

The judge described the Trump administration’s legal groundwork to justify the rollback as “wholly inadequate” and “backwards.” “An agency cannot flip-flop regulations on the whims of each new administration,″ she wrote.

The defeat was the administration’s third major loss in federal courts in just one week.

“Those were three really huge major decisions all across the span ... where the Trump administration was rebuked across the board,” said Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund, who had a role in all three cases.

Bethany Davis Noll, director of New York University’s Institute for Policy Integrity, estimates the administration has emerged victorious in 15 percent of the regulatory lawsuits. Previous administrations generally won about 70 percent, she said.

To be sure, the president has had a few wins, and many important cases are not yet resolved.

Among the administration’s victories: It scrapped an Obama-era regulation that imposed tougher restrictions on hydraulic “fracking” operations. Trump also signed 15 resolutions of disapproval that passed a Republican-led Congress, overturning an array of rules issued by federal agencies in the final months of Barack Obama’s presidency.

But where Trump has really made his mark is throttling back new regulations, said Cary Coglianese, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and director of the Penn Program on Regulation.

“There’s just been much less new regulation of great consequence during the last three and a half years,” Coglianese said.

With respect to peeling back existing regulations, Coglianese finds Trump efforts to be limited and mostly aimed at undoing the work of his predecessor. That includes throwing out Obama’s legacy efforts to moderate climate change by mandating far more fuel-efficient vehicles and setting the first limits on carbon pollution from U.S. power plants.

Other administration efforts would greatly weaken the scope of two laws that have served as the foundation for a half-century of public health and environmental regulation, removing federal protections for millions of miles of waterways and wetlands and reining in environmental reviews and public input for major projects.

Among modern-day presidents, Coglianese said, Democrat Jimmy Carter was probably the most impactful, deregulating the airline, trucking and railroad industries. Democrat Bill Clinton systematically got rid of outdated regulations through a reinventing government initiative.

With Trump, “there’s a lot more smoke-and-mirrors to the deregulatory picture than the administration paints,” Coglianese said. “It’s certainly not at all the driver of economic growth during the pre-COVID period of the administration and it’s certainly not enough to take us out of the economic troubles we find ourselves in.”

The president early in his administration directed agencies to scrap two regulations for every new one they create. The White House said last week that it has taken seven deregulatory actions for every significant new rule.

But even the White House’s own records reflect that many of those rule-cutting measures were minor. The ratio falls to 2 to 1 over the past two years when only significant rules are considered.

The president’s pose between the two pickups was designed as a reminder to supporters — not as an overture to win over new ones — that if you distrust regulations, Trump is still your guy, said Daniel Bosch, who tracks regulatory policy at the conservative American Action Forum.

“Those folks that are driven and motivated by deregulation know that the president is committed to that,” Bosch said.

Trump also sees the regulatory issue as a chance to tie Vice President Joe Biden to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. He argues that Biden’s support for the Paris climate accord and other policies would lead to higher energy bills and job cuts.

If he wins, Biden pledges to do to Trump’s regulatory record what Trump did to Obama’s: obliterate it.

“We’re not just going to tinker around the edges,” Biden said last week. He pledged to “reverse Trump’s rollbacks of ... public health and environmental rules and then forge a path to greater ambition.”

Trump’s regulatory legacy will be greatly shaped in coming months by court rulings in lawsuits challenging some of his most potentially consequential rollbacks.

“He needs to win reelection in order to defend those rules in court, and even then I think it’s going to be a longshot to win some of those,” Noll said.

Both sides know the end game for many of the rollbacks may be in the Supreme Court — and Trump may have a chance to name more justices to the court if he wins a second term.

If it comes to that, said Patton, the environmental group lawyer, then regulatory litigation could be “generation-defining.”

—-

Knickmeyer reported from Oklahoma City. Will Weissert contributed from Washington.

Hedge fund Bridgewater Associates sued by former co-CEO Murray


Bhargav Acharya, Kanishka Singh




FILE PHOTO: Eileen Murray Co-CEO, Bridgewater Associates, speaks during the Milken Institute's 22nd annual Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., April 29, 2019. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo

(Reuters) - Bridgewater Associates former co-Chief Executive Officer Eileen Murray filed a lawsuit against the hedge fund on Friday, saying it is withholding up to $100 million in deferred compensation because she publicly disclosed her gender discrimination dispute with the firm.

Murray, who stepped down as co-CEO earlier this year, said in the suit that the circumstances surrounding her departure had given rise to substantial claims by her against Bridgewater based on gender discrimination, unequal pay and breach of contract.

Murray had informed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), a self-regulatory agency that she now chairs, of the dispute with Bridgewater, which is the world’s largest hedge fund. In response, Bridgewater told Murray on July 14 in writing that her public disclosures of her dispute with the firm would result in a forfeiture of her deferred compensation, according to the complaint.

According to the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Connecticut, the withheld compensation is estimated to be in the range of $20 million to $100 million, due over the course of the next decade.


In the suit, Murray, who was one of the highest-ranking female executives in the industry as co-CEO of the hedge fund, called Bridgewater’s attempt to withhold the deferred pay an “improper gambit to silence her voice” and “part of a cynical plan to intimidate and silence her.”

The hedge fund said it had no immediate comment on the lawsuit.

Murray, 62, joined the hedge fund, founded by billionaire Ray Dalio, in 2009 and became co-CEO in 2011.


Reporting by Bhargav Acharya and Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Leslie Adl
Nikki Haley's 'Groveling' Claim About Donald Trump Leaves People Bewildered 

The former U.N. ambassador's spin on Trump's decision to cancel part of the RNC because of the coronavirus raised more than a few eyebrows.
By Lee Moran, HuffPost US

Nikki Haley attempted to rewrite the narrative on President Donald Trump’s decision to cancel the Jacksonville, Florida, element of the Republican National Convention in August over fears about the coronavirus.

And Twitter users weren’t buying it, accusing the former U.N. ambassador of “groveling” to the president.

Haley, also the former GOP governor of South Carolina who has been rumored as a potential replacement for Vice President Mike Pence on Trump’s 2020 ticket, tweeted Friday she was “proud of the selfless leadership” the president had shown in nixing the large-scale event that had been expected to attract tens of thousands of visitors.

Trump “has a great story to tell on how he turned out economy & foreign policy around,” Haley continued. “We look forward to sharing it in the next 100 days!”

We know how much @realDonaldTrump wanted to have a blowout convention.Proud of the selfless leadership he has shown in cancelling the convention. He has a great story to tell on how he turned our economy & foreign policy around. We look forward to sharing it in the next 100 days!— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) July 24, 2020

Some critics questioned Haley’s use of the word “selfless” to describe the president.
“You misspelled ‘selfish,’” quipped “Star Wars” actor Mark Hamill.

Many highlighted the Trump administration’s catastrophic handling of the coronavirus pandemic and the president’s decision to press ahead with a rally in Oklahoma last month that public health officials now believe significantly spread COVID-19 across the state.

Others noted how the economy has cratered amid the pandemic ― and that travelers from the United States are currently banned from entering certain countries because of the devastating surge in new daily cases of the virus nationwide.

You misspelled "selfish." https://t.co/YgdUpXhL8J— Mark Hamill (@HamillHimself) July 24, 2020

He turned our economy and foreign policy around in that everyone lost their jobs and then the world said Americans aren't allowed. https://t.co/qYI70FnVZX— Bess Kalb (@bessbell) July 25, 2020

Now this - THIS IS COMEDY!!! @NikkiHaley you've jumped the shart. Not a typo. https://t.co/bJOnjjNxEG— Erin Davis (@erindavis) July 24, 2020

This lady is the Ted Cruz of Lindsey Grahams. Phony. Awful. https://t.co/lLjJOi7wEZ— Villi (@villi) July 24, 2020

Selfless @NikkiHaley !? You can't be serious. Was it selfless not to wear a mask or encourage Americans to until last week? Was it selfless to hold a rally in Tulsa? Was it selfless to say #Covid_19 would just disappear? You're both smarter and
“We know how much Donald wanted to poop in his diaper. Proud of him for making boom boom in the big boy potty" https://t.co/zZd7nbODjD— Jason O. Gilbert (@gilbertj                                                                                                               


      The depths of degradation to which power-hungry, racist Republicans are willing to sink for this ludicrous fraction of a human being never ceases to appall me. #votetheGOPintoextinction#NikkiHaleyhttps://t.co/iu8Q58CURl— Dennis Perkins (@DennisPerkins5) July 24, 2020



"Turned our economy around" in two charts. pic.twitter.com/AU0wKu16Sw— David Rothschild (@DavMicRot) July 24, 2020



If you mean he has no self, then I agree: there is certainly a grotesque vacuity about him. But if you mean he lacks selfishness, I'm speechless! #Nikki#DonaldTrumphttps://t.co/mHcCq2GtUi— Rev. Michael Coren (@michaelcoren) July 24, 2020



Are you kidding. The word selfless can never be used in the same sentence with trump. He cancelled because he knew no one would show up. And you are ruining your chances to be elected by aligning yourself with this draft dodging coward. He’s finished.— American Veteran (@amvetsupport) July 24, 2020



We know how badly trump hated to cancel, but no one was going to show up because they didn’t want to get CV-19. You’ve become quite the embarrassment.— Regina Marston for CA 42 in 2022 (@Marston4ca42) July 24, 2020



Trump has literally never done anything selfless. Ever. Ever. Ever. Ever.— JRehling (@JRehling) July 24, 2020



Imagine the blowout inauguration in a few months... https://t.co/fVje8xa6xA— Jim Swift (@JimSwiftDC) July 24, 2020



Blink twice and we’ll rescue you.— Black Lives Matter Jennifer Mendelsohn (@CleverTitleTK) July 25, 2020



According to Trump It's NOT safe enough for Trump and the GOP to hold its convention for 4 days in Jacksonville but it is SAFE enough for our children and teachers to be crowded into classrooms five days a week for 6 hours a day. #Selfless#NikkiHaleyhttps://t.co/dGOtAgc6pc— (((DeanObeidallah))) (@DeanObeidallah) July 24, 2020



She is certainly right about one thing. Trump inherited a prosperous economy and turned it around. https://t.co/jCaRz59Ngj— Max Steele (@maxasteele) July 24, 2020



Pres. Trump pressured North Carolina for weeks to hold a "full scale" convention amid rising number of cases in the state. https://t.co/rSsI3RuyOy— Evan McMurry (@evanmcmurry) July 24, 2020



She *really* wants Pence's job. https://t.co/pEJhh8M2M2— JoeMyGod (@JoeMyGod) July 24, 2020



This kind of groveling might even be too embarrassing for @scottwalker.

Just kidding. https://t.co/4qDN2mUBya— Scot Ross (@rossacrosswi) July 24, 2020



Someone tell nikki the engine rooms r flooded, the captain radioed the crew n lifeboats being deployed. Do not be a member of the band...#nikkihaley#COVID19#BunkerBoyTrumphttps://t.co/1obakFSlnS— Kathleen Madigan (@kathleenmadigan) July 24, 2020



.@NikkiHaley

Set aside politics for a minute and your worship of Donald Trump.

Sending kids back to school and putting them all together in a classroom will result in kids dying all over the country.

You can't be pro-life and advocate kids going back to school in a pandemic https://t.co/zx8AYIj2AT— Don Winslow (@donwinslow) July 24, 2020



She was who we thought she was. This is your "moderate Republican," America. Just like the rest. https://t.co/te2vjjL44Y— Wajahat "Wears a Mask Because of a Pandemic" Ali (@WajahatAli) July 24, 2020



"But Tom, why would you argue for the complete destruction of the GOP? There are plenty of good Republicans who, behind the scenes, didn't like what Trump did, and they deserve support after Trump is gone."

Me: https://t.co/WJYTtr1pvP— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) July 24, 2020



Spoken like someone who's counting on a special political announcement at a cynically timed moment. https://t.co/OZIg3X9e40— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) July 24, 20
Mystery Russian projectile raises fears of arms race in space



Issued on: 25/07/2020 -

Washington (AFP)

The United States this week accused Russia of having tested an anti-satellite weapon in space, a charge Moscow has denied, saying the device was a "special instrument" for inspecting orbiting Russian equipment.

Whatever it was, the incident marks for Washington a rare military escalation in space.

The ability of one satellite to attack another was until now merely theoretical.


The United States, Russia, China and, since 2019, India, have been able to target satellites with Earth-launched projectiles, but these explosions create millions of pieces of debris in orbit, prompting the world powers to refrain from such tests.

This week's incident may be seen as a message to Washington, which under President Donald Trump is building up a new "Space Force" wing of its military.

Space Force's commander, General Jay Raymond, on Friday reiterated that "space is a warfighting domain just like air, land and sea."

- 'Object E' -

In November 2019, Russia launched a satellite named Cosmos 2542. A week later, that satellite surprised observers when it released a sub-satellite, Cosmos 2543, capable of maneuvering in orbit to observe, inspect or spy on other satellites.

This sub-satellite moved close to a US spy satellite, USA-245, and to another Russian satellite. A game of cat and mouse began in orbit, easily observable from Earth by astronomers and the US military, which publicly expressed its concern.

On July 15 at around 0750 GMT, Cosmos 2543 (the sub-satellite with a surface area of less than a square meter, according to the US military), released an object at a high relative speed, around 200 meters per second, said astronomer Jonathan McDowell.

Dubbed "Object E" by the United States, it is still in orbit and appears not to have hit anything. Its size, shape and purpose remain a mystery, but that does nothing to diminish the threat it may pose.

- A 'bullet' -

In orbit, satellites speed through the void at tens of thousands of miles per hour. The smallest contact with another object risks smashing a hole in its solar panels or damaging or even destroying it, depending on the size of whatever it may hit.

In space, the difference between a satellite and a weapon is therefore theoretical: whatever its function, "Object E" is a de facto "projectile" and therefore a "weapon," the US says.

It is the equivalent of a "bullet" in space, said Christopher Ford, assistant secretary of state for international security and nonproliferation.

"There's no such thing as a fender bender up there."

Moscow has implicitly admitted as much by accusing Washington and London of having satellite inspection or repair programs that can be used as "counter-satellite weapons."

The United States has maneuverable military satellites in orbit which can launch smaller satellites.

But it's unclear if the US has the capability to launch high-speed projectiles as the Russians have just done, said Brian Weeden, a space security expert at the Secure World Foundation in Washington.

"But they probably could if they wanted to," he told AFP.

- US highly dependent on space -

"Russia may be trying to send a strategic message about the vulnerability of US systems," Weeden said. Spy satellites are enormous, extremely costly and rare.

Russia is far less dependent upon satellites than the United States, and its satellites are much less expensive, he said.

That was echoed by the Space Force commander on Friday, who noted that ever since the Gulf War in the early 1990s, the entire US military, from war planes to infantry, depend on space-based technology for navigation, communications and intelligence.

"There's nothing we do... that doesn't have space enabled in it every step of the way," the general said.

The United States and Russia will have the chance to hold direct talks next week in Vienna, during their first meeting on space security since 2013.

© 2020 AFP
Trump eases controls on armed drone exports

Issued on: 25/07/2020 -

The United States could sell more of its armed Predator drones like this one after a decision by the Trump administration to loosen export restrictions TOBIAS SCHWARZ AFP/File

Washington (AFP)

The Trump administration moved Friday to ease controls on exports of armed drones, saying that allies need US technology and that other countries outside of a non-proliferation pact were taking over the market.

The White House announced that President Donald Trump had approved a move to diverge partly from the 1987 Missile Technology Control Regime, in which 35 countries agreed to restrict the sales of unmanned weapons delivery systems.

The MTCR was aimed at controlling the spread of missiles that could deliver large payload like nuclear weapons.

But it also covered armed drones, at the time not a major component of armed conflict as they are now.

The change ordered by Trump will reclassify armed drones from technology whose export is severely restricted to a category that can be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The drones in the category must have a maximum airspeed of less than 800 kilometers per hour, which will allow sales of the Reaper and Predator drones used by the US military, as well as others made by US defense manufacturers.

"The MTCR's standards are more than three decades old," the White House said in a statement.

"Not only do these outdated standards give an unfair advantage to countries outside of the MTCR and hurt United States industry, they also hinder our deterrence capability abroad by handicapping our partners and allies with subpar technology."

The White House statement said two years of talks had failed to reform the MTCR.

The move has worried arms control advocates who say the US sale of advanced drones to more countries could fuel the global arms race.

"The Trump administration has once again weakened international export controls on the export of lethal drones," said Senator Bob Menendez in a statement.

"This reckless decision makes it more likely that we will export some of our most deadly weaponry to human rights abusers across the world," he said.

pmh/dw

© 2020 AFP
Brazil's iconic chief Raoni to leave hospital Saturday

 25/07/2020
Chief Raoni Metuktire, pictured receiving a visit from state government officials, was hospitalized last week for weakness, shortness of breath and diarrhea Christiano Antonucci Mato Grosso State Communication Department/AFP/File

Brasília (AFP)

Brazil's best-known indigenous leader, chief Raoni Metuktire, is set to be released from hospital Saturday after a health scare, officials said.

"We can confirm he will be released Saturday," a spokeswoman from the Dois Pinheiros Hospital in the central-western city of Sinop told AFP on Friday.

Raoni, an iconic defender of the Amazon rainforest who is in his 90s, was hospitalized last week for weakness, shortness of breath and diarrhea, then transferred to the larger Dois Pinheiros hospital when his condition deteriorated.

He was diagnosed with gastric ulcers, an inflamed colon and an intestinal infection.

Raoni's health began to decline after he lost his wife of more than 60 years, Bekwyjka, who died in June after a stroke.

Known for his colorful feather headdresses and the large disc inserted in his lower lip, Raoni, a chief of the Kayapo people, has traveled the world raising awareness of the threat posed by destruction of the Amazon.

"Chief Raoni will be returning to his village" in the rainforest, Metuktire, his foundation, said on Twitter.

"We thank everyone for their support."

The hospital said Raoni's medical team and family would hold a press conference Saturday, but that it was not yet confirmed whether the chief would take part.

© 2020 AFP
'Brazil's most famous cobra' sparks trafficking probe, draws fans

Issued on: 25/07/2020
A Monocled Cobra, of the type that inadvertently exposed an animal trafficking ring in Brazil with a single bit, pictured at a zoological garden in Royan, south-western France MEHDI FEDOUACH AFP

Rio de Janeiro (AFP)

A cobra that bit a veterinary student in Brazil, putting him in a coma, has turned into a celebrity by sparking an investigation into an alleged exotic animal trafficking ring.

The monocled cobra, which is native to Asia, bit 22-year-old Pedro Krambeck Lehmkuhl on July 7 in Brasilia, sending doctors on a frantic search for the right antivenom -- so rare in Brazil that the lone doses had to be rushed from Sao Paulo.

Questions about how the snake ended up at the student's apartment soon turned into a police investigation that found 16 other snakes at a property belonging to a friend of Lehmkuhl's, as well as three sharks, seven more snakes, a Moray eel and a Tupinambis lizard at another property.
So far the probe has led to the firing of two officials at the Brazilian environmental regulator, IBAMA, over suspicions they facilitated fraudulent import permits for a wildlife trafficking ring.

The student's mother and stepfather, a police colonel, were also questioned and fined 8,500 reals (about $1,600) each on a charge of obstructing justice.

Lehmkuhl, who spent six days in the hospital, was released and fined 61,000 reals. He is still under investigation.

The cobra -- "Naja," in Portuguese -- has meanwhile become an internet sensation, after being found near a shopping center where it was allegedly abandoned by a friend of Lehmkuhl's trying to get rid of evidence.

A Twitter account opened in the snake's name, @najaoriginal, has nearly 50,000 followers.

"In less than a week, I have taken revenge on my oppressor, dismantled an animal trafficking ring, freed more than 16 friends, helped a shark and struck fear in the traffickers' hearts," it posted on July 11 -- one of several tweets that have gone viral, mixing references to Brazilian pop music and telenovelas with humorous jabs at animal trafficking.

The snake is now living at the Brasilia Zoo, which showed off "Brazil's most famous cobra" in an Instagram live video Friday.

The zoo's reptiles director, Carlos Nobrega, explained the 1.5-meter (five-foot) snake's care and diet to rapt fans as it slithered about its enclosure.

Despite its ordeal, "everything seems to be OK" with the cobra, he said.

© 2020 AFP

America divided two months after death of Floyd

Issued on: 25/07/2020

A demonstrator holds up a poster with a rendition of George Floyd on May 30 in Denver Jason Connolly AFP/File

Washington (AFP)

One after another, statues recalling slavery in America keep coming down, and night after night demonstrators taunt police in a groundswell of anger over brutality against people of color.

Two months after African American George Floyd died when a white policeman kneeled on his neck for more than eight minutes, triggering a nationwide and global outcry for justice, the United States is being shaken by an anti-racism surge that, more and more, is dividing its political class.

The days of huge, boisterous nightly marches in cities from New York to Los Angeles may be over but things are still happening. Overnight Thursday, two statues of Christopher Columbus -- for many a symbol of colonization and cruelty to native people -- were taken down in Chicago.

And that same night protesters in Portland, Oregon again clashed with police in a wave of unrest that is now nearly two months old.

With the presidential election 100 days away, this unsettled atmosphere is seen in diametrically opposed ways by the people on either side of it.

For Democrats, taking down Confederate-era statues is a way to acknowledge a racist past and stop glorifying white men who played a part in the oppression of African and Native Americans.

President Donald Trump, appealing to his white, working class base as he seeks re-election with a strong law and order message, calls this practice an act of vandalism and an insult to the heritage of the American South.

As for the protests in Portland, Republicans welcome the administration's sending in federal agents to restore order disrupted by people they label as anarchists.

Critics say these agents in military fatigues use excessive force and are just making the demonstrators more angry and violent.

The death of Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25 was condemned by politicians of all stripes. And as protesters filled the streets every night for weeks, both conservatives and liberals presented ideas for police reform.

But Trump quickly changed the debate to focus on violence committed on the sidelines of the largely peaceful marches.

As calls mounted for defunding the police -- redirecting resources away from them to people trained to deal with problems like substance abuse and domestic violence -- Trump hammered away at Democrats and even his moderate election rival Joe Biden as symbols of a "radical left" bent on simply dismantling police departments altogether.

- 600 dead -

Trump felt justified in toughening his rhetoric thanks to a rise in gun violence starting in early July in several large cities run by Democrats, and to send in federal agents to Portland and Chicago, even though local elected officials do not want those agents.

His supporters mixed the two problems together -- the wave of protests and the rise in gun violence.

"We had that terrible event in Minneapolis, but then we had this extreme reaction that has demonized police and calls for the defunding of police departments," Attorney General Bill Barr said this week.

"And what we have seen is a significant increase in violent crime in many cities. And this, this rise, is a direct result of the attack on the police forces and the weakening of police forces," he said.

In "50 Days of Democrat Silence on Dangerous 'Defund the Police' Movement," there have been 600 killings in six cities run by Democrats, an association of Republican state attorneys general said Friday.

Thomas Abt, a specialist in urban violence at the Council on Criminal Justice, said the rise in homicides is in fact linked to the coronavirus pandemic because it "has placed the individuals who are the highest risk of violence under great pressure, because the coronavirus is disproportionately affecting the people who are disproportionately affected by violence."

And while there is a tie between the rising gun violence and the unrest over police racism, it is "not for the reason that Trump says," Abt told the progressive news website Mother Jones.

Abt said the death of Floyd triggered a rise in black people's defiance of the police, although in cases of urban violence witnesses and victims of it were less likely to turn to law enforcement.

"In addition, in certain cities we are seeing sudden and arbitrary pullbacks in policing activity," said Abt.

In Atlanta, for instance, many officers called in sick for at least three days after two officers were charged including one who shot a fleeing black suspect in the back, killing him. This was called "blue flu" for the color of the police uniform.

© 2020 AFP
Black and gay: New York progressives aim to shake up US Congress

Issued on: 25/07/2020 -
Mondaire Jones -- photographed in South Nyack, New York, on July 23, 2020 -- is all but certain of being elected to Congress in November, becoming the first openly gay African-American representative TIMOTHY A. CLARY AFP

New York (AFP)

Energized by the US's massive anti-racism protests, history-making progressives from New York -- young, black, Latino and gay -- want to shake up Congress's status quo when they are likely elected in November.

Mondaire Jones, 33, and Afro-Latino Ritchie Torres, 32, are set to become the first black, openly gay members of the House of Representatives following the November 3 vote.

Galvanized by the Black Lives Matter demonstrations, they recently won primaries to become the Democratic Party's candidates in districts that overwhelmingly vote Democrat, all but securing their election to Congress's lower house.
Although they recognize the significance of the moment, they say they aren't going to be content with just being the first, and aim to engineer real change.

"I am not running for Congress to make history as the first openly gay black," Jones told AFP.

"But it is not lost on me the power of representation. Growing up, I never imagined that someone like me came to run for Congress, let alone win, because it had never happened before," he added.

The pair will be joined by 44-year-old Jamaal Bowman, who is black. He is a school principal and has three children with his wife.

Bowman stunned 16-term veteran Eliot Engel in the June primaries despite the 73-year-old being backed by the Democratic Party's elite, including Hillary Clinton and House leader Nancy Pelosi.

The trio's victory proved that the surprise election of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Congress in 2018 when she was in her late 20s was no one-off. She stunned the party establishment by taking the seat from a Democrat who had been in the House for 20 years.

"It's a victory for the new left," said David Barker, an expert on government at American University in Washington.

"The more overtly socialist wing of the Democratic Party did not really used to exist at all until not that long ago and now is a major force," he told AFP.

The presumptive congressmen are part of a wave of New York politicians belonging to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who are unseating veteran, mostly white, legislators.

Fans of senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, these men want to shake up their party and push it further to the left.

President Donald Trump is using their ascendency to score his own political points, arguing the Democratic Party is becoming controlled by "a radical left."

He has said the Republican Party will beat "Marxists, anarchists, and agitators" during his re-election bid.

- Coronavirus -

Mass protests following the killing of George Floyd in police custody in May and the racial and economic disparities highlighted by the coronavirus pandemic helped spur the New York trio's candidacies.

Torres will represent an area of the Bronx that is one of the poorest in the country.

Jones won in an overwhelmingly white district where only ten percent of the population is black.

"We are undergoing a shift within the Democratic Party: new voices, diverse voices that bring a sense of urgency about the climate crisis, about the health care crisis, about the housing crisis," said Jones.

They have pitched themselves as champions of the poor and universal healthcare. Forty million Americans lost jobs due to the COVID-19 crisis, which has killed blacks and Latinos in disproportionately large numbers.

Jones was brought up in poverty by his grandparents in the New York suburbs. He studied at Stanford University and then Harvard Law School before working in the US Justice Department during Barack Obama's presidency.

He suggests some of the old guard have not done enough and must "be replaced by people who understand what's at stake, especially under the presidency of Donald Trump."

In addition to championing racial justice, Jones and Torres pledge to fight for LGBTQ rights.

"Their voices are going to make a tremendous difference," said Elliot Imse of the LGBTQ Victory Institute, which helps LGBTQ people win elected office in the United States.

Barker -- the politics expert -- notes that Democratic representation in Congress has become much more diverse with regards to gender, race and religion, in recent years.

"But the opposite has been true with respect to Republicans," which is getting more male, more white, and more Christian, he said.

Currently, only two of the US Senate's 100 members and seven of the House's 435 representatives identify themselves as LGBTQ.

Although the LGBTQ community comprises 4.5 percent of America's population, members occupy only 0.17 percent of elected roles, according to the Victory Institute.

"We certainly have a long way to go," Imse told AFP.

© 2020 AFP