Showing posts sorted by date for query Wheat Board. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Wheat Board. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, June 17, 2023


MONOPOLY CAPITALI$M

Bunge and Viterra sign merger agreement to create global agribusiness giant

A US$8.2-billion merger between U.S. company Bunge Ltd. and Viterra Ltd. will create a global agricultural giant in an industry that has already seen a significant amount of consolidation in recent years.

The deal was announced Tuesday by the Missouri-based Bunge — which is the world's largest oilseeds processing company, operating 300 facilities in more than 40 countries worldwide — and Viterra, which is owned by Swiss commodities giant Glencore, as well as the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and B.C. Investment Management Corp.

Under the terms of the agreement, Viterra's shareholders will receive 65.6 million Bunge shares, valued at a total of about US$6.2 billion, and about US$2.0 billion in cash. Bunge will also assume US$9.8 billion of Viterra debt.

Viterra shareholders will own 30 per cent of the combined company on a fully diluted basis when the deal closes and about 33 per cent after completion of a planned US$2-billion share repurchase plan by Bunge.

Viterra, formerly the iconic Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, is a grain-handling business that has more than 80 facilities across the country and exports into more than 70 countries. 

According to the companies, the merger will bring together Bunge and Viterra’s complementary asset footprints, augmenting Bunge's grain and softseed handling capacity and helping to connect the world's largest agricultural regions with consumers around the globe.

“The combination of Bunge and Viterra significantly accelerates Bunge’s strategy, building on our fundamental purpose to connect farmers to consumers to deliver essential food, feed and fuel to the world," said Greg Heckman, Bunge CEO, in a news release.

The merger will offer farmers greater market access for their products, the companies added. 

"This further enables us to offer innovative solutions and open additional pathways for our customers," said Viterra CEO David Mattiske.

However, the merger is also part of an ongoing wave of consolidation in the agriculture sector in recent years. Among notable mergers have been German company Bayer's 2018 US$66-billion blockbuster deal to acquire Monsanto, as well as the 2018 merger between Agrium Inc. and PotashCorp of Saskatchewan, which created Nutrien Inc., the largest potash producer in the world today.

Viterra itself was acquired by Glencore in 2012 for $6.1 billion. Glencore later sold a 40 per cent stake in the company to CPP Investments and a nearly 10 per cent stake to B.C. Investment Management in 2016.

On Tuesday, the federal Competition Bureau confirmed it will be reviewing the proposed Viterra-Bunge merger in accordance with the federal Competition Act.

"The Bureau has a mandate to review mergers to determine whether they are likely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition," said spokesman Jayme Albert in an email. 

"Should we determine that the proposed transaction is likely to harm competition, we will take appropriate action."

One potential sticking point for regulators could be the fact that Bunge already owns a 25 per cent stake in G3 Global Grain Group, which was once the Canadian Wheat Board. G3 operates grain elevators in many of the same regions as Viterra.

Shannon Sereda, director of government relations, policy and markets for the Alberta Wheat Commission, said her organization is monitoring the proposed deal.

"Our mandate is to support competitive markets for our farmers, so as more details emerge, we'll of course be looking to study the impacts of the merger," she said in an interview. 

"But it's very early days."

CPP Investments said Tuesday it expects to receive about a 12 per cent stake in the combined company and US$800 million in cash in exchange for its interest in Viterra.

The merger is expected to close in the middle of 2024, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and approval by Bunge shareholders.

The combined company will be led by Heckman and Bunge chief financial officer John Neppl, while Viterra chief executive David Mattiske will become co-chief operating officer.

The board of the combined company is expected to include eight Bunge nominated directors and four nominated by Viterra shareholders after the deal is completed.

Wednesday, June 14, 2023

Your Daily Bread Will Now Come From Fewer Hands

MONOPOLY CAPITALI$M USING WORKERS CAPITAL

Analysis by Javier Blas | Bloomberg
June 13, 2023 
(Source: Bloomberg research and company reports)

It hardly generates headlines, but it puts your daily bread on the table. 

The grain-trading industry is one of the most inconspicuous — and yet crucial — businesses powering the global economy. And it just witnessed its biggest shakeup in a generation.

Bunge Ltd., a US-based food trader and processor, is buying rival grain trader Viterra, which is controlled by commodity behemoth Glencore Plc and two Canadian pension funds. 

The price tag is $8.2 billion in shares and cash, plus debt. When the deal closes, likely in 2024, Bunge’s shareholders would control about two-thirds of the company, and Glencore and the Canadians the rest.

The resulting entity would become the world’s second-largest agricultural trading company by revenue, dominating the soybean and wheat markets. It’s a consolidation that should concern antitrust regulators — and worry anyone who eats or farms.

For the last quarter of a century, four companies have largely controlled the agricultural market. The quartet comprises Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., Bunge, Cargill Inc., and Louis Dreyfus Co. — or “ABCD” for short. 

Now the “B” is getting a lot larger, overtaking the “A”, and only trailing the “C”; the concentration has boosted margins, particularly in the last couple of years, when record earnings were the norm.

Cargill became the king of agricultural commodities by buying another “C,” in this case the grain-trading business of Continental Grain Co. in 1998 for about $450 million, plus inventories and debt. 

It was the last big industry shakeup and one that prompted regulatory scrutiny. Ultimately, the US Department of Justice forced Cargill to sell some assets, arguing that without the remedy, “many American farmers likely will receive lower prices for their grain and oilseed crops, including corn, soybeans, and wheat.”

Antitrust regulators should take a similarly aggressive approach 25 years later.

 Crucially, the Bunge-Viterra merger isn’t just two companies getting together, but, in reality, four of them. That’s because Viterra is the product of an M&A race that started in 2012 when Glencore bought the original Viterra for about $6 billion. 

Soon after, in 2016, Glencore spun off the enlarged business, attracting two Canadian pension funds that took almost half of the shares. The new entity kept the Viterra name and bought US-based trader Gavilon in 2022 for about $1.1 billion.

Together, Bunge plus Glencore-Viterra-Gavilon would have had revenue of about $140 billion last year, above the $102 billion of Archer-Daniels-Midland, and just under Cargill’s $165 billion. 

Adjusted net income would have been around $3 billion, and underlying earnings, excluding interests, taxes and depreciation, would have come in close to $5.5 billion.

Bunge and Viterra claim that their geographical footprint is complementary, with little overlap. That’s technically true, but only if regulators consider, for example, the US and Canada as separate markets, or that Argentina and Brazil have little in common. 

I doubt regulators would take such approach.

“We’ll have to file in a number of jurisdictions, because of the footprint of both companies. I will never predict regulatory timelines,” Greg Heckman, Bunge’s chief executive officer, told shareholders in a conference call after the deal announcement. “We will see how it plays out.”

Both Bunge and Viterra are important for China, and Beijing will also likely take a hard look at the deal. China is trying to expand its own state-controlled global grain trader.

It isn’t just horizontal consolidation, over geography, but also vertical, up and down the supply chain. Bunge is more weighed toward processing, and Viterra towards trading.

Together, they would control a larger share of the path from farm to fork. 

Farmers and the food companies that are the clients of the traders would all have significantly less choice going forward.

The Bunge-Viterra deal makes sense from a business perspective, even if the former is buying the latter at the top of the cycle. But it requires robust due diligence from regulators. 

Last year, the International Monetary Fund described the commodity-trading industry as one of those “corners of global financial markets that were little known by the broader public.” 

That should not be the case.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. A former reporter for Bloomberg News and commodities editor at the Financial Times, he is coauthor of “The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth’s Resources.”

CPP Investments to Acquire 12% Position in Bunge through Viterra Merger


NEWS PROVIDED BY
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

13 Jun, 2023, 06:35 ET

CPP Investments holds a 40% equity stake in Viterra

TORONTO, June 13, 2023 /CNW/ - Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement in support of the proposed merger between Viterra and Bunge (NYSE: BG), an agriculture, commodities and food company. Through this transaction, CPP Investments will receive an approximate 12% equity position in the combined company and US$0.8 billion in cash upon the close of the transaction. CPP Investments has held a 40% investment in Viterra since 2016.

Bunge is a leader in oilseed processing and a significant global producer and supplier of specialty plant-based oils and fats. Viterra is a leading, global agriculture network, which connects producers to consumers with sustainable, traceable, and quality-controlled agricultural products. Together, the agribusinesses have highly complementary capabilities and footprints, and together will be able to better serve customers from an enhanced global network and increased diversification across geographies, seasonal cycles and crops.

Glencore and British Columbia Investment Management Corporation, who jointly own the other 60% of Viterra, will also become shareholders of Bunge.

"Since 2016, CPP Investments has supported Viterra on its journey to becoming a leading global agriculture business. We are pleased to support the business in its next phase of growth through this merger with Bunge," said Bruce Hogg, Managing Director, Head of Sustainable Energies, CPP Investments. "Combining these two highly complementary companies will create an enhanced agribusiness that can provide an expanded product offering to end-customers, with an increased ability to innovate and promote sustainable practices in the global food supply."

The transaction is expected to close in mid-2024, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals and approval by Bunge shareholders.

The Sustainable Energies group pursues investments in renewable and conventional energy, carbon capture, distributed and energy services, emerging and disruptive technologies, as well as agriculture. As at March 31, 2023, the Sustainable Energies group portfolio totalled C$32 billion in net assets.
About CPP Investments

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments™) is a professional investment management organization that manages the Fund in the best interest of the more than 21 million contributors and beneficiaries of the Canada Pension Plan. In order to build diversified portfolios of assets, investments are made around the world in public equities, private equities, real estate, infrastructure and fixed income. Headquartered in Toronto, with offices in Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg, Mumbai, New York City, San Francisco, São Paulo and Sydney, CPP Investments is governed and managed independently of the Canada Pension Plan and at arm's length from governments. At March 31, 2023, the Fund totalled $570 billion. For more information, please visit www.cppinvestments.com or follow us on LinkedInFacebook or Twitter.

Viterra-Bunge Merger Proposal Backed by Canadian Pension Funds

(Bloomberg) -- A merger between Glencore Plc’s Viterra unit and Bunge Ltd. to create a $25 billion agricultural trading behemoth has the support of two of Canada’s biggest pension funds, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and British Columbia Investment Management Corp. are willing to swap their combined 49.98% stake in Viterra for investments in the merged entity, said the person who asked not to be named discussing a private deal.

Spokespersons for the two pension fund managers and Viterra declined to comment.

A merger would create a trader big enough to take on the industry’s elite: Cargill Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Viterra and Bunge are negotiating the structure of a potential transaction, Bloomberg reported last week. One option being discussed envisions a stock deal where Bunge shareholders would own a majority of the combined group, according to the people.

Read More: Bunge-Viterra Deal Would Create $25 Billion Rival to Cargill

Glencore has flirted with the idea of a deal with Bunge on and off for years, and there’s no certainty it will be able to reach an agreement this time around. In 2017, the Swiss commodities giant approached Bunge about a friendly takeover, but was publicly rebuffed by the US firm. Since then, Bunge has replaced its new chief executive officer and other senior executives.

Canada’s Globe and Mail newspaper reported Monday that the Canadian pension funds would almost certainly swap their stakes for a stake in Bunge, citing people close to deal talks. Glencore Plc, with a 49.99% stake, would do the same, the newspaper reported.

--With assistance from Isis Almeida and Layan Odeh.

(Updates with background details in fourth paragraph)

©2023 Bloomberg L.P.

 

Viterra






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Viterra
TypePrivately Held
IndustryAgriculture
Founded1993
HeadquartersRotterdam, Netherlands
Key people
Kyle Jeworski
Websitewww.viterra.com


Viterra began as a Canadian grain handling business, the nation's largest grain handler, with its historic formative roots in prairie grain-handling cooperatives, among them the iconic Saskatchewan Wheat Pool.[1] Viterra Inc grew into a global agri-business with operations in Canada, the United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand and China. Viterra operated three distinct, inter-related businesses: Grain Handling & Marketing, Agri-Products and Processing, enabling it to generate earnings at various points on the food production chain from field to the table. Following its $6.1-billion acquisition by Glencore International, on 1 January 2013, Viterra was merged with Glencore purchaser, 8115222 Canada Inc.,[1] headquartered in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Viterra's grain handling and marketing operations were located primarily in two of the world's most fertile regions: Western Canada and South Australia. The company owns and operates grain terminals in Western Canada, along with 95% of the grain handling and storage facilities in South Australia. The company ships grain to markets worldwide.[2]

Viterra was also one of the largest agri-product retailers in Canada, with a network of more than 250 retail locations throughout the Prairies. As part of this business, Viterra owned a 34% interest in Canadian Fertilizer Limited CFI, a large urea and ammonia plant.

The company also operated several value-added processing businesses, including wholly owned subsidiaries like Dakota Growers Pasta Company, 21st Century Grain, making it the largest producer of industrial oats in North America, the third largest producer of pasta on the continent, the largest malt producer in Australia, a large producer of canola and a leading producer of animal feed in New Zealand.

At the time of the Glencore's March 2012, back-to-back purchase-and-agreement of Viterra's assets to Agrium, which paved the way for Glencore's purchase of Viterra, in December 2012, Viterra was generating "$2.4-billion in revenue and $244-million in EBITDA" and operated a "network of 258 agri-products retail locations throughout Western Canada and 17 retail locations in Australia. Retail locations offer fertilizer, crop protection products, seed and equipment to growers. Viterra also has a minority interest in a nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing plant in Medicine Hat, Alberta."[3]

History[edit]

Viterra Inc. was formed in 2007 as a publicly traded corporation when the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool acquired Agricore United, which was at that time the largest grain handler in Western Canada. Viterra's predecessors were the grain-trading co-operatives set up in Canada during the 1920s known as the wheat pools. It has since acquired the former Australian government-sponsored monopsony marketing board, the Australian Barley Board, created in 1939.

Grain Growers Grain Company
(1906-2008)
Saskatchewan Cooperative Elevator Company
(1911–1926)
United Grain Growers
(1917–2001)
Saskatchewan Co-Operative Wheat Producers
(1923–1953)
Alberta Wheat Pool
(1923–1998)
Manitoba Pool Elevators
(1926–1998)
Australian Barley Board
(1939–1999)
Sask. Wheat Pool
(1953–2007)
Agricore
(1998-2001)
AusBulk formerly South Australian Cooperative Bulk Handling (SACBH)
(?-2004)
United Grower Holdings
(?-2004)
Agricore United
(2001–2007)
ABB Grain
(1999–2009)
VITERRA
(2007-2013)
 

Mergers

Viterra building near Fort Road in Edmonton, Alberta.

On 19 May 2009, Viterra announced it would buy Australian ABB Grain for C$1.4 billion.[4] On 9 September, 84 percent of ABB shareholders voted in favour of the merger, with 75 percent required to pass the resolution.[5]

On March 15, 2012, Viterra announced that it had received takeover offers from multiple parties.[6] Glencore was revealed to have offered a takeover bid of $6.1 billion.[7] It intended to immediately sell off its Canadian assets to Agrium and Richardson International while retaining Viterra's overseas assets.[8] The takeover deal was completed in December 2012.[9]

Following Glencore's takeover of Viterra in December 2012, Viterra underwent some major changes. Viterra Inc. (Viterra) was acquired by a Glencore purchaser, 8115222 Canada Inc. and merged under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA). The new board of directors includes Mr. Chris Mahoney (Director of Agricultural Products of Glencore), Mr. Ernest Mostert (Financial Manager of Glencore Grain), Mr. Robert Wardell and Mr. Larry Ruud (President & CEO One Earth Farms Corp).[10]

In preparation for Glencore's acquisition of Viterra in December 2012, in March 2012, Agrium Inc entered into a $1.15bn sale agreement with Glencore, who in this way divested "90 percent of Viterra’s Canadian retail facilities, all of its Australian retail facilities, as well as their minority position in a nitrogen facility located in Medicine HatAlberta."[3]

In 2016, Glencore sold a minority stake in the business to the Canada Pension Plan, who paid "US$2.5 billion for a 40 percent stake" in its global agricultural assets, by then renamed "Glencore Agriculture".[11]

In 2020, Glencore Agriculture rebranded to Viterra and created a new brand identity, building off the Viterra brand that was created in 2007.[12]

In 2022, Gavilon was purchased by Viterra for $1.1 billion. It is expected Gavilon will be fulling integrated in Viterra by early 2023.[13]

In 2023, a merger with Bunge Limited was announced.[14]

Friday, April 28, 2023

PSAC  STRIKE
From the Picket Line: What’s at Stake in the Big Strike

Workers discuss public perceptions of ‘cushy government jobs.’ Experts eye a path to a deal.


Zak Vescera 
25 Apr 2023
TheTyee.ca
Zak Vescera is The Tyee’s labour reporter. This reporting beat is made possible by the Local Journalism Initiative.

‘I do worry about being able to just afford my home and whether I’m going to be able to keep making those payments,’ says PSAC member Damir Moric. Photo by Zak Vescera.


Workers on the frontline of Canada’s largest strike in decades say their finances and careers could hinge on the outcome of the escalating labour dispute.

More than 100,000 federal workers went on strike last week after negotiations between the Public Service Alliance of Canada and the government hit an impasse over salaries and whether workers should have the right to remote work enshrined in the collective agreement.

The union has asked for 13.5 per cent over the three-year agreement, which would be retroactive to late 2021 when their last contract expired. The Union of Taxation Employees, which represents more than 35,000 workers at the Canada Revenue Agency, have asked for an increase of 20.5 per cent, on top of a one-time nine-per-cent raise.

The federal Treasury Board’s last public offer to both units was nine per cent.

On a rainy picket line in Vancouver, Matthew di Nicolo said stereotypes about federal public servants mask the realities of the job.

“If they had these cushy government jobs where they pay you to sit around, I’d love one of those,” said di Nicolo, who processes unemployment claims. “If they were offering those, I’d take one in a heartbeat, because that’s not my experience.”

The PSAC’s membership spans 155,000 government workers. They handle tax claims, cook meals for the military and inspect and maintain fisheries on B.C.’s coast, among other things.

The union says just under a quarter of those members earn between $40,000 and $60,000 a year and that almost 60 per cent are earning less than $70,000. PSAC says about 20 per cent are earning more than $80,000 a year.

Damir Moric says the wages used to be enough to get by. But now, he’s facing higher interest payments on his mortgage and rising costs as inflation spiked in 2022.

“I do worry about being able to just afford my home and whether I’m going to be able to keep making those payments,” Moric said. “It was adequate for me starting out. Now I’m not able to really make it.”

Moric and di Nicolo were among dozens of PSAC members at a picket line in downtown Vancouver on Friday. Many huddled under archways for shelter or crowded around a folding table overflowing with Tim Hortons’ doughnuts and lukewarm coffee.

Others paced around in the rain, carrying white placards that said “2% is for milk,” a reference to part of the government proposal.

At another picket line up the street, a group of bemused strikers watched as a dark blue sports car was towed away. Members are receiving $75 a day in strike pay.

The PSAC has picketed more than 250 locations across the country, the union says, and is now also stopping work at some federal ports to ratchet up pressure at the bargaining table.

On Monday PSAC members began picketing the Cascadia Terminal on East Vancouver’s waterfront, halting work at one of the country’s largest export grain terminal.

Milton Dyck, president of PSAC’s agriculture union, said the union plans to picket more locations if a deal isn’t reached, part of a broader plan to ratchet up economic pressure on the government.

“We’re not trying to close the entire port down. But we want to start selectively choosing parts here and there,” Dyck said.

“What we’re going to be doing is we’re going to be hitting different spots and scaling up.”

PSAC president Chris Aylward and the federal government traded accusations this weekend about who was responsible for the pace of talks. Aylward said the union was willing to target “strategic locations,” including ports.

The union can legally picket grain terminals because roughly 290 of its members work at the Canadian Grain Commission and are in a legal strike position, including workers at Cascadia. Dyck said other union workers at that terminal, including the Grain Workers Local 333 and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, respected the picket line.

Dyck said his goal is a fair deal for his members, who he said are often asked to do overtime because of staff shortages across the grain commission. But the Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association worries the union’s plan could inflict economic pain on farmers. Association president Gunter Jochum said lengthy delays at grain ports could back up supply chains, increasing costs and potentially hurting Canadian grain prices.

“The companies will just pass that cost up down the line and it ends up at the lowest common dominator, which is the farm,” Jochum said.

The Canadian Grain Commission, which regulates the handling and export of those crops, says exports are still flowing. Spokesman Rémi Gosselin said the commission was allowing grain companies to collect samples on the commission’s behalf. Gosselin said those samples were then being tested and evaluated by commission managers so they can still be exported during the strike.

PSAC represents roughly 65 per cent of the commission’s employees, Gosselin said, something he said has had a “significant” impact on their operations. “We totally respect our employees’ right to strike, but at the same time we have a mandate to fill,” Gosselin said.

Jochum has called for the federal government to allow private inspectors to do the work, something PSAC would likely viscerally oppose, since those workers would need to cross picket lines and would undercut their pickets.

The Cascadia Terminal is jointly owned by agriculture giants Viterra and Richardson International and has more than 280,000 metric tonnes of storage space for canola, barley and other grain. A Viterra spokesperson declined to comment on the picket line when contacted on Monday.

.
Milton Dyck, president of PSAC’s agriculture union, said the union would expand pickets at grain terminals that are critical to exports. Photo by Zak Vescera.


PSAC president Chris Aylward and the federal government traded accusations this weekend about who was responsible for the pace of talks. Aylward said the union was willing to target “strategic locations,” including ports.

University of Saskatchewan political science professor Charles Smith said the PSAC doesn’t have a tradition of labour militancy.

He said the strike is part of a larger period of labour upheaval sparked by high inflation, rising interest rates and low unemployment rates that have made workers seek better working conditions and in a strong position to get them. The COVID-19 pandemic, Smith said, likely amplified that since many public federal workers were asked to continue reporting for work and launch new programs in a period of uncertainty.

“The PSAC were asked to do a hell of a lot of work in a way they were not trained for and get the job done, and they did,” Smith said.

Public opinion on the strike appears to be slightly favourable towards PSAC. An Angus Reid poll conducted last week found 48 per cent of respondents supported the union’s wage requests, compared to 40 per cent who opposed it and 12 per cent who were unsure. The online poll was conducted among a representative randomized sample of 1,276 people and had an estimated margin of error of 3 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Mark Thompson, a professor emeritus at the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business, said federal public servants typically are not as sympathetic to the public as their provincial counterparts, who are often more visible and provide more direct services.

“Not very many of us have direct interaction with federal people. And it’s not always something that we relish. If you cross the border and you want to wait in line, you just want to get it over with,” Thompson said.

Matthew di Nicolo says any perceptions of cushy government jobs don’t reflect reality. Photo by Zak Vescera.

But he said the federal government’s wage proposal was likely too low to secure a deal. Most provincial public servants in B.C., for example, secured a wage increase of between 10.74 to 12.74 per cent over three years for most positions, with the final total depending on the rate of inflation in the years of the agreement.


A Freedom Denied Canadian Workers
READ MORE

Thompson said the most interesting part of the dispute is remote work. Many federal servants began working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and did not return to the office until this year, when the Treasury Board set a requirement for employees to report to work in person at least twice a week. In a statement, the government said it made that decision because working in-person “supports collaboration, team spirit, innovation and a culture of belonging.”

PSAC now wants the right to remote work enshrined in collective agreements, something that has been controversial in other organizations.

In B.C., the government resisted requests from unions to guarantee remote working privileges in collective bargaining last year, leaving it up to managers to decide. But the province has also signalled it wants to be flexible about remote work and that it wants more workers in different regions of the province outside Victoria and Vancouver.


‘These Workers Have Proven Their Worth Time and Again’
READ MORE

Vanessa Radunz, who works in procurement services for the federal government, says being able to work remotely has saved her hours of commuting each day on transit plus associated costs. She says she is able to do her job — which involves helping multiple federal departments buy anything they might need — from home with ease.

“It’s an extra two hours a day. You have to set all your equipment up, troubleshoot any technical things, pack it all up at the end of the day and go home,” said Radunz.

But the biggest sticking point on the picket line is still wages. The federal Treasury Board has said the union’s requested pay increases are unreasonable and that its revised offer of nine per cent reflects the recommendations of a Public Interest Commission Report. The reports are part of the process in federal labour negotiations.

Steve Claxton, a supervisor who has worked for the government for 24 years, says salaries have become less competitive over time compared to the private sector or working for the provincial government. He said many of his colleagues also worked extensive overtime at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, he said, and were hopeful the next collective agreement would acknowledge that contribution.


Why 2023 Could Be the Year of the Union
READ MORE

“No one knew what the pandemic was going to end up like or how dangerous it was at the time, and they came in every day without a contract,” Claxton said.

Di Nicolo joined the public service in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic began. He met some of his colleagues for the first time in person on the picket line. During the pandemic, he said, he worked overtime hours to stand up the Canada Emergency Response Benefit for the millions of workers who lost their jobs in the first months of the pandemic.

“During the pandemic we got a lot of kinds words. They were saying, ‘You guys are doing a lot of work, you’re essential.’ And then two years later we’re looking for a cost of living adjustment and we’re not getting it,” Di Nicolo said. “The words are great, but I cannot buy groceries with some kind words.”