Friday, December 03, 2021

One American Culture Actually Benefited From 'The Worst Year in Human History'

Mike McRae - Yesterday 


As far as years go, you could do a lot better than 536 CE. By some historians' standards, it may have well been 'the worst year to be alive in human history'. Depending on where a person lived around the globe, those cold, bleak times kept on truly sucking for many years to come.

Now, it seems it might not have been the worst thing, at least for the Ancestral Puebloan communities who occupied the southwestern US. In fact, the darkness of this brief, global ice age might have heralded a bright new day for their culture.

A study conducted by a team of archeologists and anthropologists from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), and Colorado State University in the US has uncovered signs that the population spread across the Four Corners region not only recovered from a catastrophic climate shift in the mid-6th century – in some ways they came back stronger than ever.

To get a firsthand sense of why 536 CE was hard going across much of the world, the Byzantine historian Procopius made a note of the time in his account of the Persian Wars:

"For the sun gave forth its light without brightness, like the moon, during this whole year, and it seemed exceedingly like the sun in eclipse, for the beams it shed were not clear nor such as it is accustomed to shed."

Today, it appears this sun-shielding fog had its origins in a series of volcanic eruptions across the Americas, which spewed enough ash into the atmosphere to turn summer into winter across much of the Northern Hemisphere.

Just five years later, a good chunk of the Roman population would fall beneath a plague like no other. Oh, and another colossal volcanic event, this time in El Salvador, churned out even more ash to top it all off.

Life in North America wasn't much better. Measurements of tree rings from northern Arizona reveal a drop in temperature and precipitation that lasted for decades.

Yet archaeological records show that in spite of these challenging times, the Ancient Puebloans would go on to develop a rich, complex culture that would thrive for centuries.

To gain a clearer perspective on just how their founding agrarian communities coped with a harsh and sudden climate shift, the researchers amassed a database of hundreds of food materials and their radiocarbon dates, all collected from 230 dig sites across the region.

The ages, densities, and locations of the agricultural products reflected a story already familiar to archaeologists, of a widespread population – broken up into lots of smaller, localized settlements – practicing farming techniques that suited their local conditions.

Up to around 400 CE, the land was a patchwork of foragers and farmers. Some were more the latter, growing more substantial crops that included maize and beans to supplement diets.

Significantly, by the 6th century, a sharp rise in population growth began to limit the amount of farmland available. Where dispersed kin groups were once keen to pack up and move when opportunities presented, by the middle of the century they were sitting tight and collaborating with their neighbors in more complex social groups.

Comparing the evidence of this cultural mixing in their database with the climate records represented by tree rings from the Colorado Plateau, the researchers argued there was a strong link between the climate changes and cultural shifts.

"Archaeologists have long recognized that demographic and social change transformed Ancestral Pueblo societies during the late 6th and early 7th centuries CE, but we contend that these changes are best understood when juxtaposed with the consequences of extreme cold at the beginning of this interval," the team writes.

The hardships in the wake of the year 536 CE put the mix of emerging communities across the southwest to the test. Some could reorganize, developing socio-political ties that saw them through. Others failed to flourish. In the end, the years from hell served as a selection process for cultural practices that could bring people together and allow them to share their experience to weather the tough times.

For instance, an ancient farming community that occupied the Cedar Mesa and Grand Gulch was known to raise domesticated turkeys. By AD 550, this practice was common across the entire southwest region, indicating a sharing of knowledge and a push to diversify food sources.

Within a few generations, the skies cleared once more and good times returned. Armed with new cooperative social practices, the Ancient Puebloans would go on to establish a rich, resilient civilization that would last centuries.

Of course it wasn't all rainbows and turkey dinners. With sedentary lifestyles and complex political systems come their own challenges and risks of inequality. But in the wake of numerous shake-ups, the Ancient Puebloans always seemed to find a way to come back strong, until finally vanishing in search of new lands in the 14th century.

Even today, traces of their farming practices can be found living on in cultures such as the Hopi.

Faced with our own years of hardship, we might take heed of the resilience the Ancient Puebloans found in coming together to share knowledge. And hope we too might emerge stronger in the years ahead.

This research was published in Antiquity.
Political rage: America survived a decade of anger in the 18th century – but can it now?

Maurizio Valsania, Professor of American History, Università di Torino 

© Archive Photos/Getty Images


Americans have an anger problem.

People rage at each other. They are angry at public officials for shutting down parts of society. Or for the opposite reason because they aren’t doing enough to curb the virus. Democrats vent their rage at Republicans. And Republicans treat Democrats not as opponents, but as enemies.

Meanwhile, the American founders are being literally taken off of their pedestal in a rejection of the history they represent. And, of course, a violent mob of Donald Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in early 2021, trying to disrupt that most fundamental of U.S. institutions, the peaceful transfer of presidential power.

But public rage and hysteria in America aren’t new. The 1790s, as well, were a period of political violence.

Over that entire decade, political opponents pelted each other with the accusation that they had lost the true American principles. Just as today, delusion stood in place of reality.

Despite that decade of rage, however, America came together as a nation. Today’s rage-filled country may not end the same way.


© Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images
A pro-Trump mob storms the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021.

Strong passions, angry mobs

Following a 1791 tax on whiskey, western Pennsylvania was set ablaze. Angry mobs torched buildings. Federal tax inspectors were beaten up, stripped naked and tarred and feathered. A few people died.

Political discourse was similarly inflamed. Passions were strong. Articles appeared in newspapers that portrayed President George Washington as a scoundrel, a swindler, the king of all Pied Pipers.

“If ever a nation was debauched by a man, the American nation has been debauched by WASHINGTON,” read the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser from December 1796. “If ever a nation has suffered from the improper influence of a man, the American nation has suffered from the influence of WASHINGTON.”

One could also hear Virginians drinking to the toast “A speedy Death to General Washington.”

Thomas Jefferson noticed that times had changed. He had seen warm debates and high political passions before, but never such levels of bigotry: “Men who have been intimate all their lives cross the streets to avoid meeting, and turn their heads another way, lest they should be obliged to touch their hat,” he wrote in June 1797.

America as family

As a historian of the early republic, I offer that if Americans have always been so angry and ready to snap, it is because they care – at least at some level, at least instinctively. Popular despondency and disillusionment would be much worse.

They may not admit it, but Americans care because the United States is like a family – and in the family, passions are strong.

This is no sentimentalism: Americans have long defined themselves as a family. They’ve done it from the birth of the republic.

A quick reading of the Constitution shows that the nation has never been treated as a contract among strangers, a deal that could be severed at short notice. It was conceptualized as an expansive family, a living organism, the truest embodiment of “We The People.”

In the late 18th century, the framers of the Constitution saw affection as the defining trait of the American experiment; but the main problem, for them, was to build and sustain affection.

Do not listen, framer James Madison averred, “to the unnatural voice which tells you that the people of America, knit together as they are by so many cords of affection, can no longer live together as members of the same family; can no longer continue the mutual guardians of their mutual happiness; can no longer be fellow citizens of one great, respectable, and flourishing empire.”

During the years of the Revolution, it was relatively easy. An external enemy, the British, was a sufficient incentive for Americans to love one another.

With independence gained, things got murky. Alexander Hamilton, the most famous among the framers, was uncomfortable: “Upon the same principle that a man is more attached to his family than to his neighborhood, to his neighborhood than to the community at large, the people of each State would be apt to feel a stronger bias towards their local governments than towards the government of the Union.”
Sticking together

Devising practical methods to boost attachment and counter rage was the big challenge of the 1790s. As professor of government Emily Pears points out, 18th-century political leaders suggested three main approaches to achieve this.

The first was building a better federal administration that could deliver personal and material benefits to its citizens. Providing funding for infrastructure, creating efficient networks for commerce or levying equitable taxes would eventually win people’s attachments.

The second was forming shared cultural practices. Making citizens feel that they have the same political values, and that there is a common history and tradition they are part of, would generate pride and comradeship. Symbols like flags, songs, toasts or parades would help develop these connections.

The third was trying to increase participation. Through the process of voting, citizens would get closer to one another and to their representatives. Participation would make connections stronger, thus fostering affection.
Can the center hold?

Whether any of these three approaches is still viable today is unclear.

The first, the utilitarian approach, depends on leaders’ ability to tackle issues of social justice and inclusion: Who are the beneficiaries of the federal government? Who are its citizens?

The second, the cultural approach, is obviously marred by the “other side” of national history, slavery. The question is unavoidable: Whose history, whose traditions are Americans talking about?

And the third, the participatory approach, is discouraged by the very parties that put obstacles in place. Is there a way to get rid of gerrymandering and other barriers to full representation?

And yet, finding strategies that would enhance emotional bonds is crucial to any nation. Especially today. Rage is on the rise. Eventually, popular despondency and disillusionment may come.

Family will be broken.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Maurizio Valsania does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
'Spirit of resistance': Marking 500 years since the first slave revolt in the Americas

Kynala Phillips

Five hundred years ago this month, the Americas saw its first revolt of enslaved people, when Black Africans rose up against colonial powers in the Caribbean.

Historians believe the Santo Domingo Slave Revolt took place on Dec. 26, 1521, starting at a sugar plantation owned by Diego Columbus, son of Christopher Columbus. He was governor of La Española, the present-day Dominican Republic and Haiti, according to a monograph on the revolt published by the CUNY Dominican Studies Institute (DSI) at the City College of New York.

The enslaved people marched 62 miles from the plantation to a village in an attempt to reach other Black Africans seeking freedom. The uprising was strategically planned during the Christmas season, because the enslaved knew that the white Spaniards would be distracted and deep in prayer, according to the monograph.

“This was so well planned, which is also very interesting to me as a sociologist, that they came from different places in Africa," said scholar Ramona Hernandez, director of CUNY DSI and a professor of sociology at City College. "So they spoke different languages yet they found ways of putting together an insurrection."


“It reveals this spirit of resistance, and not taking on oppression passively," Hernandez said.


The Spanish soon sent in military reinforcements that effectively halted the revolt. But the legacy of the rebellion, which is considered the first recorded revolt in the Americas, reverberated throughout the region.


© Provided by NBC NewsSlaves Attempt To Overcome Their Spanish Owners 
(Theodor de Bry / Heritage Images/Getty Images)

The start of 'Black Codes'


The year after the revolt, La Española introduced laws targeting Black people that were set in place to restrict the rights and movements of any person who was Black, whether they were free or not. This was one of the first versions of “Black Codes” seen in the Americas, according to Hernandez.

“These are the first laws that are going to tell masters and others that were a part of the power structure in La Española how the black enslaved people are going to be treated,” Hernandez said.

She noted that many enslaved people did manage to escape after arriving on the island in the late 1400s. But the Santo Domingo Revolt was the first time Black Africans were combating authorities head-on, which led to strict and punitive treatment.

Overall, there is a lot that is still unknown about how the enslaved people of La Española managed to attempt such a bold insurrection. To further the conversation and unpack the significance of this history, CUNY DSI and the Black Studies Program at City College is hosting a two-day conference titled “The Struggle for Freedom in La Española.”

In collaboration with nearly 13 other schools and institutions, including the Eduardo León Jiménes Cultural Center in the Dominican Republic, the multidisciplinary conference looks at how this uprising confronted the Spanish colonials and defied the status quo.

“We need to commemorate this, that this happened 500 years ago, that the civil rights movement that we saw here [in the U.S.] was simply a continuation of something that our ancestors have done, so that our people continue to think that it is their job to combat what is evil in humanity," Hernandez said.

Although the conference is set to engage well-known scholars and voices on the subject, Hernandez expects to tap younger generations who can benefit from understanding and exploring the history of liberation in the Americas.

“Any action that one of our people have taken anywhere, anytime to undermine what has been done to us, we need to remember it," said Hernandez, "and we need to acknowledge it so that the younger generation doesn't forget."


World can't recycle its way out of plastic crisis - experts

By Joe Brock and Kanupriya Kapoor - 


SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Recycling will not be able to contain a runaway global plastic waste crisis, experts said on Friday as they called on companies to reduce plastic production and shift more products into reusable and refillable packaging.

Moving away from single-use plastics and towards systems that allow for it to be reused are among the solutions that experts believe could ease the problem, but radical changes to the production system are also needed.

"We won't be able to just recycle or reduce our way out of it," said Rob Kaplan, CEO of Circulate Capital, which invests in emerging markets initiatives to solve the plastic waste crisis.

"It's a systems problem and needs to combine upstream and downstream solutions," he said, speaking on a panel at  the  Reuters Next conference.

The world produces around 300 million tonnes of plastic waste every year, according to the United Nations Environment Programme.

Video: Plastics recycling is failing, and there's no consensus on how to fix it (CNBC)

But less than 10% of all the plastic https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/environment-plastic-oil-recycling ever made has been recycled, in large part because it is too costly to collect and sort. The rest ends up dumped or buried in landfills or burned.

As recycling schemes falter, big consumer goods companies, including Unilever, Coca-Cola and Nestle, have started investing in projects to burn plastic waste as fuel in cement kilns, Reuters revealed https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/environment-plastic-cement in October.

Meanwhile, plastic production is projected to double by 2040 - something many critics of the industry believe is excessive and the biggest driver of the huge waste problem facing the planet.

"Recycling can't compete with overproduction," said Von Hernandez of the Break Free from Plastic campaign, a global alliance calling for an end to plastic pollution.

"So what we need is limits on virgin plastic production," he said, speaking alongside Kaplan on the panel.

While there is no global regulator or treaty for the plastics industry, the panel speakers said individual consumers can help drive the changes needed in corporate behaviour and hold companies accountable through the life cycle of their plastic products and where they end up.

"Citizens and consumers can compel these companies...to reveal their global plastic and carbon footprint, reduce the amount of plastic they are producing and deploying to the market, an d really reinvent their delivery systems," Hernandez said.
     
(Editing by Ana Nicolaci da Costa)


'Drowning in garbage': Ukraine struggles with trash crisis

AFP - 


For stray dogs and scavenging birds, Landfill No.5 outside the Ukrainian capital Kiev is a treasure trove of trash, but the mountains of overflowing and noxious garbage are plaguing residents.

Nina Popova, a 73-year-old retired accountant who lives in the nearby village of Pidgirtsi, says life there is a misery.

"It reeks. We're all sick. We have heart problems and difficulty breathing," Popova told AFP outside her modest brick cottage.

Breathing heavily, she added that her children "suffocate" when they come to visit.

Covering 63 hectares (156 acres), the sprawling dump outside Kiev is one of the largest in Ukraine and part of network of more than 6,100 landfills.

Already at capacity, it was slated for closure in 2018, with garbage diverted to a new site. But the new facility was never constructed and trash is piling higher and higher.


© Sergei GAPON
Analysts say Ukrainian authorities are either unwilling or unable to pay more to better process garbage

The story of the site points to a larger problem in the country.

Thirty years after Ukraine gained independence from the Soviet Union, it lacks a functioning waste management system and requisite resources to tackle a garbage crisis that is perpetuating public health and ecological concerns.

The president's office concedes that most landfills are overflowing and fall short of safety standards. It estimates some 33,000 illegal dumps have proliferated throughout the country.


© Aleksey Filippov
Landfills contribute to climate change as a major emitter of methane

"It's not a secret to anyone that Ukraine is drowning in garbage. And every day, every minute the situation is getting worse," then-deputy head of the presidency, Yulia Svyrydenko, warned in September.

- 'Lever' to halt climate change -


She made the comments at a meeting of local and regional officials after President Volodymyr Zelensky voiced concerns. But the problem has much wider ramifications.


© Sergei SUPINSKY
The Ukrainian president's office concedes that most landfills in the country are overflowing and fall short of safety standards

Globally, landfills like the one menacing Popova's neighbourhood contribute to climate change as a major emitter of methane, a gas 30 times more harmful than CO2 according to the United Nations.

UN Environment Programme executive director Inger Andersen in May said reducing methane was "the strongest lever we have to slow climate change over the next 25 years".

To address the problem, Kiev introduced a law in 2018 requiring households to sort waste to aid recycling efforts.

The order has largely been ignored and just four percent of the approximately 10 million tonnes of household trash produced annually is sorted, according to the presidency.

Added to that, there is only one waste incinerator -- dating from the Soviet period -- to serve the entire country of 40 million. It lacks capacity to handle waste even from Kiev.

The crux of the problem is that Ukrainian authorities are either unwilling or unable to pay more to better process garbage, analysts said.

Kiev shells out less than 10 euros ($11) to process a ton of waste compared to 100-170 euros in Western European countries, explained Svyatoslav Pavlyuk, executive director of the Ukrainian Association of Energy-Efficient Cities.

- 'It's scary' -


"This sum isn't enough to actually treat waste. It only covers its transportation to a field and its placement in the ground," Pavlyuk said.

Yevgeniya Aratovska, a 42-year-old economist, took matters into her own hands six years ago, launching a small sorting site in Kiev called No Waste Ukraine.

"I realised that a lot of people didn't even know that it's necessary to sort," Aratovska said.

Khrystyna Richmanenko did not realise how much waste she was producing until she started sorting it. "It's scary," the 29-year-old teacher remarked.

She added that there were no recycling centres near her home or official instructions on where to find one.

"You have to look for yourself how to do it properly," she added.

More than 45 percent of Ukrainians say a lack of recycling bins is the main obstacle to more sorting, according to a November poll.

Analysts added that authorities should do more to raise awareness among Ukrainians about the impact their waste has on the environment.

Ultimately, said environmental activist Kostiantyn Yalovyi, what was needed is a drastic increase in funding to better handle waste.

Even though that investment would be likely to fall on Ukrainians and trigger protests, the stakes of doing nothing were much higher.

"If today we don't start sorting and generally change Ukrainians' attitude towards garbage, the entire country could turn into a landfill", Yalovyi said.

osh-ant/jbr/imm/ach/jm
Virginia board denies permit to extend fracking pipeline into North Carolina














Zack Budryk - 1h ago

Virginia's air pollution governing body on Friday voted against approving an air quality permit for a proposed compressor station in the southern Virginia town of Chatham.

On the second day of a two-day meeting, the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board voted 6-1 against the approval. The proposal would have extended the Mountain Valley Pipeline, which carries fracked fuel, over the border into North Carolina.

Environmental groups and local advocates have vocally opposed the project, citing environmental reviews indicating it would increase the levels of air pollutants such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and formaldehyde.

Sixteen members of Virginia's House of Delegates had previously urged the board to deny the permit in October, citing environmental justice concerns.

"Emissions from compressor stations contain toxic materials and any proposed project that would introduce new health hazards into a community should be very carefully considered," they wrote. "A project's potential impacts and contribution to cumulative impacts must be weighed against any arguments as to its necessity."

Environmental advocates praised the board's decision, including Lynn Godfrey, community outreach coordinator for the Sierra Club's Virginia chapter.

"No one should be asked to sacrifice their air, water, and health so that fossil fuel executives can make a quick buck in a world transitioning to clean energy. This is a win for Virginia communities who already live with elevated levels of fossil fuel pollution, and everyone everywhere who wants a livable future for their children," Godfrey said in a statement. "The writing is on the wall if the wealthy investors backing this project are willing to read it: the age of fossil fuels is over, it's time to drop this polluting pipeline."

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan has repeatedly emphasized a focus on environmental justice, or addressing the impacts of environmental policy on disadvantaged communities. In October, the agency began the process to increase reporting requirements for another compound, ethylene oxide, that has been linked to respiratory issues and cancer in local communities.
1,200 Canada Goose Employees Vote to Unionize

Garment workers at three Canada Goose factories in Winnipeg, Manitoba, this week voted to unionize, after a year in which staff accused the luxury-apparel producer of unsafe practices and antiunion efforts.


© TheStreet1,200 Canada Goose Employees Vote to Unionize

Canada Goose has denied the accusations.

With 86% voting in favor, 1,200 employees have chosen to be represented by the Canadian branch of Workers United, the union said in a statement.

They join two Ontario locations that already have some employees who are union members.

With jackets costing more than US$1,000, Canada Goose apparel became popular with celebrities in the past decade.

The push for unionization started three years ago and accelerated earlier this year after employees anonymously told Vice World News that they had to work under poor sanitation, insufficient distribution of personal protective equipment and a padlocked emergency exit.

In June, the New York Times reported that labor activists protested outside the Boston offices of Bain Capital, the private-equity firm that acquired a majority stake in the company in 2013 and took it public soon after.

"Today marks a monumental step forward for workers in Winnipeg at Canada Goose," Rabia Syed, an organizing coordinator with Workers United, said in a news release.

"There is still work to be done, but for workers to have a seat at the table is a huge win."

The Philadelphia-based Workers United represents more than 86,000 employees in the apparel, food, service and hospitality industries and pushes back against unfair practices against employees.

Canada Goose told Canadian outlet CTV News that it welcomed Workers United "as the union representative."

"We welcome Workers United as the union representative for our employees across our manufacturing facilities in Winnipeg and look forward to working alongside them as we have in Scarborough and Toronto for decades," a company representative said in a statement.

At last check, stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange was off 7.5% at $36.46. The stock had touched a 52-week high $53.64 in mid-November.This article was originally published by TheStreet.
BuzzFeed News Staffers Who Walked Off Job in Protest Told They Could Lose One Day’s Pay

Todd Spangler - 


BuzzFeed told employees of BuzzFeed News who staged a walkout Thursday — protesting what their union claims is the media company’s refusal to negotiate on key contract terms — that their pay would be docked by one day, unless they retroactively applied for paid time off.

“This morning, after learning our union members were walking off the job today, BuzzFeed management said they plan to dock us a day of pay unless we retroactively put in a day of PTO,” the BuzzFeed News Union tweeted Thursday. “Nonetheless, ALL of our members held strong and did not return to work today.”
More from Variety

BuzzFeed Boosts Revenue 51% in Q2 and Narrows Loss, After Getting Slammed by COVID a Year Ago

BuzzFeed Will Pay for User-Contributed Content This Summer for the First Time -- Up to $10,000 per Post

BuzzFeed News staff received an email Thursday morning from deputy editor-in-chief Tom Namako asking them to confirm whether they were working. “If we don’t hear back from you, we will assume that you are on strike. If you are striking today, in this instance, you can use vacation or a comp day for this time not worked — just make sure that you put it into Workday by tomorrow at 5 p.m. PT at the latest. Otherwise we will deduct today’s pay from your next pay period.”

About 60 employees are members of the BuzzFeed News Union. Overall, BuzzFeed has 1,100 employees and that’s set to increase to about 1,400 next week when the company officially brings staffers of Complex Network on board.


The one-day walkout organized by the BuzzFeed News Union was timed for the same day that shareholders of 890 5th Avenue Partners — the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that proposed merging with BuzzFeed — voted to approve the deal. BuzzFeed is set start trading on Nasdaq under the symbol “BZFD” on Monday, Dec. 6, when BuzzFeed’s previously announced acquisition of Complex is expected to close as well.

Through the SPAC deal, BuzzFeed will net just $16 million in cash and is also raising $150 million in debt financing. The SPAC had raised $287.5 million through its IPO earlier this year but investors withdrew most of that prior to closing of the BuzzFeed pact.

“BuzzFeed won’t budge on critical issues like wages — all while preparing to go public and make executives even richer,” the union, which is affiliated with NewsGuild of New York, said in a tweet. “There is no BuzzFeed News without us, and we’re walking out today to remind management of that fact.”

According to the BuzzFeed News Union, company management has offered its members only 1% annual guaranteed pay raises. BuzzFeed also has refused to reconsider raising the salary floor of $50,000, which the union said is “not enough to live in the major cities like New York and San Francisco where BuzzFeed has newsrooms.”

In its negotiations, BuzzFeed has offered an average 2.5% annual pay increase to the BuzzFeed News Union as a whole (with each member guaranteed 1%, and the remaining 1.5% distributed across the group based on merit).

A representative for BuzzFeed, asked for comment on the walkout, said the company has a bargaining session planned for next Tuesday (Dec. 7) with union reps “where we hope the union will present a response on these issues. Before then, the company is gearing up for an incredibly exciting milestone: becoming the first publicly traded digital media company, and acquiring Complex Networks. We couldn’t be more excited about everything that lies ahead for BuzzFeed and its employees.”

In addition to the pay issues, the BuzzFeed News Union is objecting to what it says is management’s more restrictive approach to regulating creative work employees are allowed to do outside the company. BuzzFeed’s management also has “repeatedly resisted our proposal that union members not be disciplined” for failing to hit certain traffic metrics or revenue targets, the union claimed.

In June, BuzzFeed announced the plan to merge with 890 5th Avenue Partners, a deal that valued BuzzFeed at $1.5 billion. As part of the SPAC deal, BuzzFeed acquired Complex Networks from Verizon and Hearst for $300 million. The BuzzFeed News group includes HuffPost, which BuzzFeed acquired from Verizon. After that deal closed, the company laid off 70 HuffPost employees.


Alberta Premier Jason Kenney hires lawyers over environmentalist lawsuit threat

EDMONTON — The Alberta government has hired a private law firm to defend Premier Jason Kenney after environmental groups threatened him with a defamation lawsuit.

© Provided by The Canadian Press

Paul Champ, lawyer for the environmentalists, says he's been notified that the province has retained counsel.

"(Kenney's) counsel advises that they will review the matter and respond 'substantively' in the near future," Champ said in an email. "We fully expect Premier Kenney will get solid advice on this matter."

The lawsuit threat was made in a letter to Kenney last month by eight groups who allege the premier deliberately twisted the findings of a public inquiry into their activities and funding sources.

That inquiry, headed by Calgary forensic accountant Steve Allan, looked into whether environmental groups were conspiring to landlock Alberta oil by spreading misinformation about its environmental impacts. The inquiry found the groups had done nothing wrong and were within their freedom of speech rights.

But the groups say that even after Allan's report was released, Kenney continued to falsely accuse them of spreading misinformation about Alberta's energy industry in public statements, social media posts and government websites. Specific documents are referenced in the letter Kenney received.

The groups allege those statements were intended to damage their reputations and credibility in the eyes of the public.

They are asking for an apology, the posts to be taken down and the websites rewritten.

A spokesman for Kenney's office has previously said they would "vigorously respond in court if and when necessary."

The letter had given Kenney until Nov. 30 to accede to those demands before filing a statement of claim against him. Champ said the government's move to retain lawyers from outside government will delay that filing as Kenney's lawyers review the facts and advise their client.

"Assuming the premier follows this advice, we expect to see those posts taken down with an apology," wrote Champ.

The Allan inquiry cost taxpayers $3.5 million.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 2, 2021.

— Follow Bob Weber on Twitter at @row1960

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press
Polaris Launches First Electric UTV Created With Zero Motorcycles



Janaki Jitchotvisut 

The Ranger XP Kinetic is definitely the strong, silent type.

Way back in September, 2020, Polaris first announced its 10-year partnership with Zero Motorcycles, officially called rEV’d up. The plan was simple: Utilize Zero Motorcycles-developed all-electric powertrains to power a new generation of electric off-road vehicles and snowmobiles. As of December 2, 2021, Polaris officially introduced the first vehicle borne of this partnership: the Ranger XP Kinetic UTV.

Incidentally, from the very beginning, Zero explicitly stated that this partnership would only apply to off-road vehicles and snowmobiles. That means anyone hoping to hear about electrified full-size Indian Motorcycles will just have to keep hoping, for the time being.

Now that we have more than just teasers for the Ranger XP Kinetic, what are the specs like from this first collaboration between Polaris and Zero? The newly-developed electric motor makes a claimed 110 horsepower, as well as 140 pound-feet of torque. “Dry weight” of the pre-production version is listed as 1,730 pounds, although since it’s an EV, the distinction between dry and curb weights isn’t really as meaningful.

Polaris plans to offer the Ranger XP Kinetic in two versions: Premium and Ultimate. Towing capability for both is rated at 2,500 pounds, while each can haul 1,250 pounds inside the vehicle itself.

Where the Premium and Ultimate models differ is in available charging rates and battery capacities. From the factory, Premium versions can charge at 3kW, while Ultimates can charge at 6kW. An additional charging accessory system can boost charge rate for either trim level by 3kW. All Ranger XP Kinetics can charge from both 120V or 240V outlets, as owners choose.

As far as batteries go, the Premium comes with 14.9 kWh of lithium-ion battery capacity, while the Ultimate carries 29.8 kWh. Premium range is rated at up to 45 miles, and Ultimate range up to 80. Charge times can be as fast as 5 hours from an empty battery if you have a 240V outlet, says Polaris.

If you already have a combustion-powered Ranger XP 1000, Polaris specifically designed the electric Ranger XP Kinetic to be compatible with about 95 percent of the XP 1000’s accessories. For Ranger owners considering a change to this new version, that’s definitely good news.

Polaris officially opened orders for the Ranger XP Kinetic starting on December 1, 2021, with actual shipments planned to begin in summer of 2022. The Ranger XP Kinetic Premium MSRP starts at $24,999, while the Ultimate MSRP starts at $29,999.

Source: Polaris







© RideApart.com Copyright 2023 Polaris Ranger XP Kinetics - Ridge