Thursday, January 11, 2024

Study Calls for Halt in New Factory Farms, Citing “Enormous” Human Health Risks

“The disease risks to humans from industrialized intensive animal farming … are enormous,” the study says.
TRUTHOUT
January 10, 2024

DAMIAN VASQUEZ / 500PX / GETTY IMAGES


Anew study published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science argues that there should be a moratorium on building or expanding poultry and pig farms because of the high risk of zoonotic disease.

While the study focused specifically on the U.K., the findings concern pig and poultry farming globally.

“The disease risks to humans from industrialized intensive animal farming, and especially mixed swine and poultry farms, are enormous, and must not be understated,” the report says. “The authors therefore strongly discourage granting any planning applications for new or expanding industrialized intensive animal farms, especially poultry and pig farms or a mix thereof, and especially in areas with high existing concentrations of intensive animal farms.”

Zoonotic diseases, or infectious diseases that can spread from animals to humans, were the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is estimated to have killed at least 3 million people in 2020 alone. At the time, there was evidence that minks being farmed for their fur in Denmark were contracting COVID and passing it to humans. In response to COVID outbreaks in more than 200 farms, Denmark culled 17 million minks.



Harvard Report: US Meat Supply Could Start the Next Global Pandemic
“At every turn marginalized communities are at increased risk,” an animal law expert told Truthout
.
By Zane McNeill , TRUTHOUT  July 24, 2023

“I worry we are not doing enough to monitor that situation to make sure this virus isn’t spilling into the animal populations,” Jonathan Runstadler, professor in the department of infectious disease and global health at the Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, told NBC News in 2020. “The other area to be concerned about is having this virus spill into an animal host that becomes a regional or local reservoir for viral infections,”

In addition to fur farms, factory farms have been responsible for multiple zoonotic disease outbreaks, including the 1997 Bird Flu (H5N1), 2009 Swine Flu (H1N1), and 2020 Bird Flu (H7N3). Recent reports assert that the next global pandemic may come from commercial factory farms, which are breeding grounds for zoonotic diseases due to overcrowding, limited genetic diversity, compromised hygiene and elevated stress levels in animals.

“There is exceptionally strong evidence for a link between low animal welfare levels and high disease transmission risks,” Andrew Knight, co-author of the report and professor in the School of Environment and Science at Griffith University, told FarmingUK. “These environments are fertile breeding grounds for the emergence of new influenza pandemics and other dangerous diseases.”

These factors collectively weaken the immune systems of the animals involved, which make them more susceptible to spreading diseases that can make the jump to humans.

“There are also established concerns about intensive farms being hot beds for disease,” Jenny Mace, an animal welfare lecturer at the University of Winchester and co-author of the report, told FarmingUK. “Despite these concerns, planning permissions are still being granted for new intensive farms or expansions of existing farms.”

While there has been a steady increase in legislative attempts to place a moratorium on factory farms, such as the Farm System Reform Act, introduced over multiple legislative sessions by Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey), factory farms are increasing globally. In the U.S., 99 percent of animals farmed for meat are raised in factory farms.

The report’s authors argue that instead of building or expanding factory farms, “[e]fforts should concentrate on supporting arable agriculture (or transitions toward this), and on de-intensifying remaining animal farms.”

This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


ZANE MCNEILL is a trending news writer at Truthout. They have a Master’s Degree in Political Science from Central European University and is currently enrolled in law school at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. They can be found on Twitter: @zane_crittheory
Line 5 Poses Catastrophic Risks—It’s Past Time President Biden Shut It Down

The president has a choice: side with local leaders working to protect their water and communities or side with a foreign company looking to increase their profits.



Activists in Michigan gather around a sign reading, "Line 5: people or pipeline? Which side are you on?"
(Photo Ben Jealous/Twitter)


DAVID HOLTZ
Jan 10, 2024
Common Dreams

Any day now, the Biden administration could weigh in on the future of the most dangerous, outdated, and unnecessary oil pipeline in the country. We don’t need to wait for a lengthy legal process to play out while this ticking time bomb puts us at risk. President Biden can decommission and shut down Line 5, an aging oil pipeline running through the Great Lakes, by revoking its presidential permit before it’s too late.

Line 5 is owned by the Canadian company Enbridge, the biggest of Big Oil transporters. As a shortcut to get its oil to a Canadian refinery in Sarnia, Ontario—which receives 95% of the product—Line 5 cuts through Wisconsin and Michigan. While the Canadian government has protected the oil industry and Enbridge, the Biden Administration has the opportunity to side with the people of Michigan and Wisconsin instead of Big Oil.

Along its 645-mile route, Line 5 has failed 33 times already, spilling at least 1.1 million gallons of oil since 1968. Despite the risks and Enbridge’s historic failures as a pipeline operator, the Biden Administration, under pressure from Canada, has been silent on Line 5’s future. The pipeline continues to illegally operate through the Bad River Band's land in northern Wisconsin and the Straits of Mackinac in Michigan.

Line 5 is dubious engineering and a bad investment for Michigan and Wisconsin, built across the most vulnerable site for an oil spill in the entire Great Lakes watershed.

Canada’s government is lobbying the Biden Administration to keep the aging Line 5 operational, but local leaders have long called for it to be shut down. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed a lawsuit to shut Line 5 down because it runs through the Straits of Mackinac, threatening the world’s greatest freshwater source. Meanwhile, a federal judge in Wisconsin sided with the Bad River Band and ordered the pipeline off tribal lands where Line 5 trespasses through a sensitive tribal watershed. President Biden has a choice: side with local leaders working to protect their water and communities or side with a foreign company looking to increase their profits.

Communities and leaders are calling for Line 5 to be shut down, which can be done without raising prices at the pump. Rather than respect the law, Enbridge has proposed work around schemes that would continue to put communities at risk.

The Bad River Band tribe has demanded that Line 5 get off their land and out of their watershed—yet the pipeline remains upstream and still puts the tribe at risk. Instead of complying with the tribe’s demand, Enbridge proposes building a reroute that skirts the entire reservation. While the reroute would no longer cross through tribal land, it would be located upstream of the reservation, keeping the Tribal Community in harm’s way of future spills.

Enbridge has proposed the Great Lakes Tunnel Project to house the new Line 5 pipeline. It would be a concrete tunnel, 21 feet in diameter, that runs under the Straits of Mackinac. This is dubious engineering and a bad investment for Michigan and Wisconsin, built across the most vulnerable site for an oil spill in the entire Great Lakes watershed.

It’s clear that Enbridge is a bad actor that can’t be trusted, and has a terrible safety record of oil pipeline disasters. In addition to the 1.1 million gallons of toxic oil Line 5 has already spilled, Enbridge’s other disastrous tar sands pipeline, Line 3, ruptured four aquifers in northern Minnesota during construction alone, which Enbridge touts as the safest construction possible. In its Line 5 maintenance—or lack thereof—Enbridge has violated pipeline support standards and numerous other legal doctrines that protect us and our shared natural resources from the dangers of oil spills. In its 70 years of operating Line 5, Enbridge has demonstrated countless times that it simply doesn’t care about its repeated violations and instead would rather prioritize their profits than abiding by the law and protecting our communities.

There is no justification to keep Line 5 operating or extend its life when science—and the Biden administration’s own stated commitment to climate action require us to rapidly transition away from fossil fuels. President Biden must step up and use his presidential authority to force Line 5 to shut down. It’s either us, the people who live in the Great Lakes region, or Big Oil.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


DAVID HOLTZ is a member of the Sierra Club’s Board of Directors and resides in Michigan. He helps lead a coalition of environmental, civil, and Tribal organizations working for an orderly decommissioning of the Line 5 oil pipeline in the Great Lakes.
Full Bio >
Ocean Heat, Sea Surface Temperatures Shattered Records in 2023

"The ocean is the key to telling us what's happening to the world, and the data is painting a compelling picture of warming year after year after year," one study author said.


Ocean Rebellion staged a theatrical action ahead of the G7 summit at Marazion beach, Cornwall, United Kingdom, on June 5, 2021.

(Photo: Gav Goulder/In Pictures via Getty Images)


OLIVIA ROSANE
Jan 11, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

2023, the hottest year on record overall, was also the hottest year on record for the world's oceans.


A study published Thursday in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences found that the upper 2,000 meters of the ocean warmed by 15 zettajoules in 2023 compared to 2022, according to one dataset. To put that in perspective, the world's economy only requires half a zettajoule to run every year, the Chinese Academy of Sciences explained in a statement. Fifteen zettajoules would be enough to boil 2.3 billion Olympic-sized swimming pools or roast 260 trillion turkeys.

"The ocean is the key to telling us what's happening to the world, and the data is painting a compelling picture of warming year after year after year," study co-author John Abraham, a professor at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota, toldThe Guardian.



Ocean heat content has been on the rise since the late 1950s, and, for the past decade, each year has been the warmest on record, according to the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The ocean is an important indicator of human-caused climate change because around 90% of the excess heat produced by the burning of fossil fuels is absorbed by its top 2,000 meters, according to United Press International.

"As long as the level of greenhouse gases remains relatively high in the atmosphere, the oceans will keep absorbing energy, leading to the increase of the heat in the oceans," study lead author Cheng Lijing, an oceanographer at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP) at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, toldNature.

"We're already facing the consequences and they will get far worse if we don't take action."

The study was the latest in a yearly effort led by the IAP; this year's installment had contributions from 34 scientists in 19 research bodies in China, France, Italy, New Zealand, and the U.S., according to Nature and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The researchers looked at two datasets for ocean heat content: the IAP's dataset and one compiled by the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

The 15 zettajoules figure came from the IAP dataset, while the NOAA dataset gave a lower increase of nine zettajoules. Lijing explained on social media that both organizations used the same raw data, but had different methods of quality control and spatial interpolation. Sometimes, accurate high temperature measurements can be mistakenly discarded as inaccurate, the Chinese Academy of Sciences pointed out.

"This means that the warming might be greater than the numbers reported here," Lijing said in a statement.

NCEI oceanographer and study co-author Tim Boyer told Nature that "the important point in the paper and for scientific understanding is that the ocean is warming consistently, year over year to new record levels of ocean heat content."

In addition, the paper documented a record rise in sea surface temperature. It was higher than 2022's by 0.23°C for the entire year and by what the authors called an "astounding" 0.3°C for the second half of the year.



Another measurement that reached record levels in 2023 was ocean stratification, which occurs when the warmer water floats near the surface and does not mix as much with the cooler water below, The Guardian explained. This can harm ocean life by reducing the amount of oxygen available to it. It also decreases the ocean's ability to absorb both heat and carbon dioxide.



Another point raised by the study authors is that what happens to and in the ocean does not stay in the ocean.

"Ocean warming has far-reaching consequences on physical, human, and biological systems in the Earth system, which is expected to be much more severe in the future because of the irreversibility of ocean warming in the following centuries," Lijing wrote on social media.

Warmer oceans increase sea-level rise, fuel extreme weather events such as storms or droughts, and impact marine life by forcing some animals to move in search of cooler waters or changing the time when migrations or reproduction occur, Nature explained.

"We're already facing the consequences and they will get far worse if we don't take action," Abraham told The Guardian. "But we can solve this problem today with wind, solar, hydro, and energy conservation."

"Once people realize that, it's very empowering," Abraham continued. "We can usher in the new energy economy of the future, saving money and the environment at the same time."
'No, This Is Not a Parody': Florida School District Bans Dictionaries Under DeSantis Law


Webster's Dictionary & Thesaurus and The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank are among the books that the Escambia County School District has yanked from library shelves.



A student holds a placard at a walkout protesting Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' attacks on public education outside Orlando City Hall on April 21, 2023 in Orlando, Florida.
(Photo: Paul Hennessy/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

COMMON DREAMS
Jan 10, 2024

Dictionaries and encyclopedias are among the more than 2,800 books that a Florida school district has pulled from library shelves in an effort to comply with a law that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed last year.

Judd Legum, author of the Popular Information newsletter, reported Wednesday that the Escambia County School District said the books that have been banned pending further investigation "may violate H.B. 1069," which "gives residents the right to demand the removal of any library book that 'depicts or describes sexual conduct,' as defined under Florida law, whether or not the book is pornographic."

"Rather than considering complaints, the Escambia County School Board adopted an emergency rule last June that required the district's librarians to conduct a review of all library books and remove titles that may violate H.B. 1069," Legum noted. "Each school in Escambia County has thousands of titles. As a result, many school libraries were closed at the beginning of the school year pending the completion of the review."




Florida led the United States in book bans during the 2022-2023 school year, with PEN America documenting 1,972 instances of bans across 37 districts.

"In a state with approximately 70 districts, this means that over half of all Florida school districts experienced banning activity," PEN noted in a recent report.

PEN, Penguin Random House, and a coalition of authors joined parents and students last year in filing a lawsuit against Escambia County in federal court, arguing that the mass removal of books from school libraries violates the plaintiffs' "rights to free speech and equal protection under the law."

A hearing in the case was scheduled to take place on Wednesday. Florida's Republican attorney is backing Escambia's school board.

"In a brief submitted by the state of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to 'convey the government's message,' and that can be accomplished through 'the removal of speech that the government disapproves,'" Legum noted Wednesday. "This is a novel argument about the purpose of school libraries.

In addition to Webster's Dictionary & Thesaurus for Students and The American Heritage Children's Dictionary, Escambia County is denying students access to biographies of former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, the singer and songwriter Beyoncé, and talk show host Oprah Winfrey, according to a list obtained by the Florida Freedom to Read Project.

The list also includes The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank.

"The Escambia County School Board banned most of these books at the request of Vicki Baggett, a high school English teacher in the county," Legum reported. "Baggett is responsible for hundreds of challenges in Escambia County and neighboring counties."
Famine in Gaza Is a Culmination of Israel’s Long War on Palestine’s Food System

At least 18 percent of all agricultural land in Gaza has been damaged as a result of the war.

By Leanna First-Arai , TRUTHOUTPublishedJanuary 10, 2024
One of the children of Mahmoud Abu Dorra, who lost his wife during the Israeli attacks, is seen in a partially destroyed building, where the family has taken refugee after leaving their home, in Rafah, Gaza, on January 5, 2024.
ABED ZAGOUT / ANADOLU VIA GETTY IMAGES

As of this week, the top emergency relief official for the United Nations, Martin Griffiths, deemed Gaza all but “uninhabitable,” with its 2.2 million residents facing the “highest levels of food insecurity ever recorded.” Experts have attributed the escalating crisis to Israel barring food aid from entering and being distributed in the Gaza Strip. “The little food that does get in is very difficult to distribute due to the constant bombings, destroyed roads, frequent communication blackouts, and shelters overflowing with of hundreds of thousands of internally displaced people crowding into smaller and smaller areas,” according to a statement by Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem.

But the grave status is also the result of a legacy of attacks on all branches of the Palestinian food system. At least 32.6 square kilometers of arable land has been damaged as a result of wartime activities since October, including razing, vehicle movement, bombing and shelling. The damage, constitutes at least 18 percent of all agricultural land in Gaza, according to the latest available UN Satellite Centre (UNOSAT) data, though it is likely an underestimation, according to an interview with Moayyad Bsharat, regional coordinator for the global peasant movement La Via Campesina. The data was compiled from images taken by UNOSAT’s Sentinel-2 satellite, which were evaluated in comparison with the six preceding growing seasons, from 2017 to 2022, then analyzed and mapped by Truthout.



80 Percent of Global Famine Is Currently in Gaza, UN Expert Warns
“In my life, I’ve never seen anything like this in terms of severity, in terms of scale, and then in terms of speed.”

By Sharon Zhang , TRUTHOUT January 3, 2024

It’s as if the entirety of farmland in the U.S. states of Florida, California and Texas had been destroyed. Much like the most heavily damaged agricultural lands in Gaza, the three states serve as major fruit and bread producers.

Taken together with a new study published on Social Science Research Network on January 9, the agricultural land damage data provides a wider snapshot into the massive environmental impact of the ongoing bombardment of Gaza. Over the first two months alone, seven days of which were under ceasefire conditions, researchers estimate that 281,315 metric tons of carbon dioxide were emitted, with the majority of emissions coming from U.S. supply flights and other aircraft missions conducted by F-16 and F-35s, followed by the use of Israeli artillery, armored vehicles and Hamas rockets. The emissions constitute roughly the equivalent of 75 coal-fired power plants operating for a year and are greater than those of the annual emissions of 20 individual countries.

The study, which is the first to estimate the climate cost of the latest episode of violence, has been deemed a conservative estimate. Among other reasons, it does not include emissions stemming from damage to soil and agricultural systems, which has been far-reaching and is a major impact of warfare.

 
At least 37,379 structures in Gaza have been destroyed, or sustained severe or moderate damage since October 2023.
LEANNA FIRST-ARAI, BASED ON DATA FROM UNITED NATIONS SATELLITE CENTRE

“Destroyed Again”

Saleh B, an olive farmer from eastern Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip who requested a pseudonym fear for of their safety, told Truthout that much like all other elements of the bombardment, Israeli attacks on the Palestinian food system since Hamas’s surprise attack on October 7, have been extreme. “While the deliberate destruction of agricultural lands to keep us hungry and poor is nothing new to us, the scale and intensity are unprecedented and unlike anything we have witnessed before.”

Saleh’s family, which since 1956 has tended a grove of olive trees on a 1.5-acre parcel of land, has been the target of Israeli attacks for over two decades, he said. The most brutal personal attack to date came in 2000, when at noon, Israeli occupation forces bulldozed all 250 of his olive trees, the olive oil from which he depended on to support his family. With the help of Jordan-based nongovernmental organization the Arab Group for the Protection of Nature, the group that connected Truthout with Saleh and other growers over email, he has since recovered his orchard. But Saleh is not currently able to access his lands as they are being “indiscriminately bombed” he said.

The conflict has also wreaked damage on agricultural land in Israel, as The Times of Israel reports, leading to the formation of craters on the land of vegetable farmer Rahamim Mughrabi, in Netivot, Israel. Many Israeli farmers have attributed agricultural damage to Hamas rocket attacks. But as Mughrabi told The Times, Hamas attacks are “the least of his worries,” as Mughrabi’s farm is suffering more damage from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), whose artillery fire recoil has pulverized the soil and formed dust clouds that have settled on protective nets, thus blocking sunlight and killing this season’s tomato, arugula and coriander crops. But while Israeli farmers have received the help of everyday citizens who have flocked to fields near the border with Gaza to fill in for Thai farmworkers who fled the country following Hamas’s attack, which killed 40 workers; Palestinian farmers like Saleh face major crop loss.

Eight miles away in northeast Gaza, beekeeper Obaida A, who requested a pseudonym, is unable to access her apiary. The city where she is from and where she keeps bees, Beit Hanoun, is located in the governorate that has experienced the greatest damage to agricultural land, with 39 percent damaged as of December, primarily impacting strawberries and potatoes.

Obaida’s father, also a beekeeper, was killed by an Israeli airstrike in 2006, while harvesting honey. In 2021, the majority of her own 50 hives were destroyed by Israeli smoke bombs. While she has been able to recover some hives, the area has been unreachable since October. “I am pretty certain they have been destroyed again,” Obaida said.


Agricultural land has been extensively damaged in North Gaza, where at least  39 percent of agricultural land is damaged, particularly strawberries and potatoes.
LEANNA FIRST-ARAI, BASED ON DATA FROM UNITED NATIONS SATELLITE CENTRE.

“We Feel We Are Targeted Because We Provide Sources of Food”

IDF attacks on the Palestinian food system extend to the waters. Meerab D is a fisher from Gaza, who, like Obaida, requested a pseudonym for safety and inherited the profession from his father. He told Truthout that the 15-year-old blockade has restricted his family and other fisherfolks’ access to Palestinian waters. Under the 1993 Oslo Accords, Israel agreed to a Palestinian fishing range of 20 nautical miles. That decreased to six nautical miles as part of a 2012 ceasefire, and then to three in 2013, in response to missiles fired into southern Israel, a move which “constitutes collective punishment and severely damages the livelihood of Gaza fishermen,” according to B’Tselem.

Much like attacks on other branches of the food system, Israel’s targeting of fisherpeople in Gaza has become almost routine, with 133 incidents of Israeli attacks on local fishers within Palestinian waters in 10 months of 2016 alone, according to a report by the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights. More recent attacks, including in August 2023, when Israeli naval forces opened fire and launched tear gas canisters toward fishing boats along the coast of the northern Gaza strip, prompted peaceful protest by 200 fishers.

Meerab says he was targeted in 2021, and lost most of his fishing nets. “The current situation is dire. With the harbor and boats extensively damaged, [we are left with] uncertainty about how we will be able to return to our work after the war ends,” Meerab said. “We feel we are targeted because we provide sources of food and protein in the context of the siege and food shortage.”

The extent of the current devastation to the food system is a direct legacy of years of Israel’s increasing grip on the region’s natural resources. As Leah Temper, an ecological economist at McGill University, told Truthout, the level of crisis at the moment is the result of “extremely precarious infrastructure being systematically targeted by Israel over the course of decades.”

Temper is the co-founder of a website called the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice, which documents and maps cases of environmental injustice across the world. It currently contains 3,942 entries, including three cases in Gaza: “Israel’s blockade and its effect on Gaza’s water supply and sanitation,” the “Israeli navy’s violent repression on Palestinian fisher people” and “the decimation of the Palestinian fishing industry.” The latter entry notes that since 1967, Israel has rendered 85 percent of maritime space along the Gazan coast inaccessible.

“This is part of an ongoing ecocide in Palestine beginning with land dispossession and continuing with the contamination and destruction of the environment, further threatening the viability of life and livelihood,” Temper said. “Israel cannot be insulated from the health and environmental impacts and the risk of epidemics its war crimes in Gaza are causing.”
In less than one square kilometer, in Beit Hanoun, 15 structures including storage houses and farmers’ homes have been destroyed since October 2023. Shading denoting agricultural land deemed “damaged” has been removed to view land uses.
LEANNA FIRST-ARAI, BASED ON DATA FROM UNITED NATIONS SATELLITE CENTRE.


Ending Military Aid, Rejecting Greenwashing, Looking to the Future


In addition to calls for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, as well as an end to U.S. military aid to Israel, which supplies 16 percent of Israel’s overall defense budget and 80 percent of its weapons, Moayyad Bsharat, regional coordinator for the global peasant movement La Via Campesina, told Truthout that Palestinian farmers will need “millions” in aid and support from the international community over the long haul to restore healthy agricultural operations — provided that Israel is not allowed to ultimately seize the lands it has damaged.

One feature not visible in satellite images are hundreds of wells that have been destroyed in the latest round of attacks. Since 1995, Israel has retained exclusive control of water resources between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, with the exception of access to an aquifer under the Gaza Strip. Destruction of wells tapping into the water source, in combination with Israel’s recent flooding of Hamas tunnels with seawater, will pose major challenges to soil health when farmers are finally able to irrigate their fields again. Once the latest surge in violence is over, Bsharat says remediating the top 30-50 centimeters of soil, including the microorganisms needed for viable crops, is expected to take around five years, albeit significantly longer in places that have been impacted by white phosphorus. After that, citrus groves, for example, will need three to five years from the time of planting to start bearing fruit, while olives will require five to seven. “This is a very long period for people in a food insecure situation,” he said.

The Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection did not respond to a request for comment by press time.

With Israel due to appear at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, later this week, to be tried under The Genocide Convention, scholars have brought renewed attention to the key role that ecocide has played historically in settler-colonial violence, as well the impact of U.S. complicity in greenwashing in the case of Israel. This is exemplified by a high-profile, $70 million plan to bring climate-smart agriculture to the region, which the U.S. State Department announced in July 2023. Palestinian climate activist and Ph.D. candidate at Queen Margaret University, Manal Shqair characterizes the U.S.-Israel “climate-smart” agricultural venture as one of many attempts to “eco-normalize” relations in the region.

Greenwashed projects, such as Project Prosperity, which entails the generation of solar energy in Jordan to power a desalination plant in Israel, allows Israel to portray itself as an environmental steward and benevolent force whose goal is to help others in the region — when in actuality — the project reinforces Jordan’s reliance on purchasing water from Israel, which has partially manufactured Jordanian water scarcity by diverting water from the Jordan River. “This [kind of greenwashing] deflects attention from longstanding crimes which are culminating in the ongoing genocide in Gaza, fully backed by the Biden administration,” Shqair told Truthout.

Bsharat says calling out U.S. and Israeli greenwashing as cover for ecocide, and ultimately genocide, is essential. “They are destroying everything, the biodiversity of our planet, the agroecology and ecological situation in all areas, in the sea, in the air, and everywhere.”

LEANNA FIRST-ARAI is a freelance journalist who covers environmental and climate (in)justice. Her work has appeared in Undark, Sierra Magazine, Yes! Magazine, Outside Magazine, on New England Public Radio and elsewhere. Follow her on Twitter: @FirstArai.
MORE WAR CRIMES
Press Freedom Groups to Biden: Stop Letting Israel Kill Journalists in Gaza

"We believe your administration can and must do more to effectively pursue accountability for journalists killed in the hostilities and to protect and support local and international journalists covering it."


A funeral ceremony is held for Palestine TV correspondent Mohammed Abu Hatab, who was killed, along with his family members, in an airstrike on his home in Khan Yunis, Gaza on November 3, 2023.

(Photo: Abed Zagout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

JESSICA CORBETT
COMMON DREAMS
Jan 10, 2024

With at least 79 Palestinian, Israeli, and Lebanese members of the media killed during Israel's war on the Gaza Strip over the past few months, half a dozen human rights and press freedom groups on Wednesday implored U.S. President Joe Biden to "act immediately and decisively to promote the conditions for safe and unrestricted reporting on the hostilities."

"The United States has a long record of strong support for Israel, including civilian and military aid, and is clearly one of Israel's most influential partners," states the letter from the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Freedom House, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF), Human Rights Watch, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and Reporters Without Borders.

Since the Hamas-led attack on October 7 that sparked Israel's brtual response, Biden has bypassed Congress to arm Israeli forces while also asking lawmakers for a $14.3 billion package, on top of the $3.8 billion in military aid that the U.S. gives the country annually.

"The United States should use its considerable influence with the Israeli government to press them to ensure that journalists are able to safely document military operations and to shed light on their compliance with international humanitarian law."

"We believe your administration can and must do more to effectively pursue accountability for journalists killed in the hostilities and to protect and support local and international journalists covering it," the coalition wrote to Biden, noting other similar calls. "The United States should use its considerable influence with the Israeli government to press them to ensure that journalists are able to safely document military operations and to shed light on their compliance with international humanitarian law."

Committee to Protect Journalists president Jodie Ginsberg said last month that "the concentration of journalists killed in the Israel-Gaza war is unparalleled in CPJ's history and underscores how grave the situation is for press on the ground." The letter highlights that as of Wednesday, CPJ has tracked the deaths of 79 journalists: 72 Palestinian, 4 Israeli, and 3 Lebanese.

Local authorities in the Gaza Strip, which has been governed by Hamas for nearly two decades, said Wednesday that 115 Palestinian journalists are among the at least 23,357 dead, including many thousands of innocent civilian men, women, and children. Whatever the true figure for journalists is, the letter stresses that "almost all of them" have been killed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken—who is visiting the Middle East this week—faced intense backlash twice last month for calling 2023 "an extraordinarily dangerous year" for members of the press, without mentioning those killed in Israel's U.S.-backed blockade and bombardment of Gaza.

As the letter points out: "The U.S. State Department spokesperson recently said that the United States has not seen any evidence that Israel is intentionally targeting journalists. Yet credible reports by human rights and media organizations indicate that the IDF strikes in southern Lebanon on October 13 that killed Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah and injured six other journalists from Reuters, Al Jazeera, and Agence France-Presse were unlawful and apparently deliberate."

"The IDF has also acknowledged deliberately targeting a car in which journalists were traveling on January 7, killing two journalists and seriously injuring a third," the letter continues. "In at least two other cases, journalists reported receiving threats from Israeli officials and IDF officers before their family members were killed in Gaza. Of course, the targeted or indiscriminate killing of journalists, if committed deliberately or recklessly, is a war crime, and the International Criminal Court has said that it will investigate reports of war crimes committed against journalists in Gaza."

The groups detailed that along with risking their lives, those reporting on the Israeli war on Gaza and escalation along the Israel-Lebanon border face challenges including "the refusal of Israel and Egypt to allow international journalists access to Gaza except under Israeli military escort (and even then, with restrictions on reporting), internet shutdowns that prevent news and testimonies from Gaza from reaching the outside world, arbitrary detention, and harassment and intimidation."

"In addition, the Israeli government is requiring media outlets in Israel to submit almost any detailed reporting on the war to its 'censorship' office for review, while banning reporting on significant topics of public interest related to the war in Gaza," they wrote.

"The Biden administration says it cares deeply about journalists' freedom to cover the war but has failed to demand Israel ensure journalists' safety or hold it accountable when it doesn't."

The groups want Biden to pressure all parties to "respect the right of journalists to report on the hostilities, ensure journalists' safety, allow all journalists seeking to evacuate from Gaza to do so, abjure the indiscriminate and deliberate killing of journalists, promptly and thoroughly investigate all attacks on journalists, and hold accountable individuals found to be responsible for them."

They are also demanding increased access for journalists along with "personal protective equipment and materials used for newsgathering," as well as "thorough, transparent, and public assessments of the end-use of U.S. weapons and military assistance to Israel."

The organizations are further calling on Biden to "support swift, transparent, and independent investigations into the killing of all journalists and ending the long-standing pattern of impunity in the killings of journalists by the IDF, including Palestinian American Shireen Abu Akleh," who was killed in the occupied West Bank in May 2022.

"The Biden administration has been all talk when it comes to journalists killed by the Israel Defense Forces," said FPF director of advocacy Seth Stern. "The Biden administration says it cares deeply about journalists' freedom to cover the war but has failed to demand Israel ensure journalists' safety or hold it accountable when it doesn't."

Watchdog Condemns Israel's 'Use of Detention to Silence Palestinian Media'


"This intimidation, this terror, these endless attempts to silence Palestinian journalism, whether by chains, bullets, or bombs, must stop," said the head of Reporters Without Borders' Middle East desk.


Families, loved ones, and colleagues mourn two journalists killed by Israeli airstrikes in Rafah, Gaza on January 7, 2024.
(Photo: Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Images)

COMMON DREAMS
Jan 10, 2024

Reporters Without Borders said Tuesday that Israeli authorities have arrested at least 38 Palestinian journalists since the start of its latest assault on Gaza, which has taken a devastating toll on media workers and their families in the besieged enclave.

The watchdog group, known internationally as Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), slammed the Israeli government's "use of detention to silence the Palestinian media." Most of the Palestinian journalists arrested by Israel since October 7 have been held without charge under a notorious procedure known as administrative detention.

People in administrative detention "can be jailed for periods of up to six months that can be renewed on nothing more than an Israeli judge's order," RSF explained. The group said at least 19 Palestinian journalists are currently being held in administrative detention while others have been jailed "pending trial on trumped-up charges of inciting violence."

Many Palestinian detainees have reported torture and other degrading treatment while in Israeli custody. Said Kilani, a photojournalist who has done freelance work for The Associated Press and other outlets, told RSF that he was arrested along with a medical team as Israeli forces closed in on Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza.

"We were forced to take our clothes off, we were insulted and humiliated," said Kilani, who was detained for 14 hours despite immediately identifying himself as a journalist.

Kilani told RSF that after his release, he reunited with his wife and son, who had also been briefly arrested.

"While they had been held, their house had been set on fire," RSF reported, "and the journalistic equipment that Kilani had hidden in the hospital had also been burned."

Diaa al-Kahlout, a reporter for the Al-Araby Al-Jadeed news site who was released from Israeli detention on Tuesday, said he was tortured while in custody for more than a month. His home was also burned down.


Jonathan Dagher, the head of RSF's Middle East desk, said in a statement that "at least 31 Palestinian reporters are currently held in Israeli prisons in connection with their journalism."

"This intimidation, this terror, these endless attempts to silence Palestinian journalism, whether by chains, bullets, or bombs, must stop," said RSF. "We call for the immediate release of all detained journalists and for their urgent protection."



Dozens of journalists, most of them Palestinian, have been killed in Israel, Gaza, and Lebanon since October 7, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)—a death toll the group has described as "unparalleled."

Throughout the war, journalists have been violently beaten by Israeli soldiers, targeted by airstrikes, and fired on by tanks. Over the weekend, an Israeli airstrike killed two journalists in southern Gaza, including the eldest son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief Wael Dahdouh. Five members of Dahdouh's family have now been killed by Israeli bombing.

RSF has filed two war crimes complaints against the Israeli government at the International Criminal Court, accusing the country's forces of intentionally massacring members of the press.

Asked about Israel's targeting of journalists during a press conference in Tel Aviv on Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, "To the journalists who've lost their lives or have been injured in Gaza, we feel very strongly for them as well, and the essential work that they do is more vital than ever."

Blinken did not pledge to investigate or hold Israel accountable for deliberately killing members of the media, which is a war crime.


Chris McGreal, a former Guardian correspondent in Jerusalem, condemned the lack of outrage from the West in the face of such atrocities.

"It would surely be different if American or European reporters were the ones dying," McGreal wrote in a column on Wednesday.


CNN Admits 'Disturbing' Israel-Palestine Coverage Policy 'Has Been in Place for Years'


"It's Israel's way of intimidating and controlling news," said one critic.


CNN's Jeremy Diamond points toward Israeli military hardware in a field near Israel's border with Gaza.
(Photo: screenshot/CNN)
COMMON DREAMS
Jan 05, 2024

CNN has long been criticized by media analysts and journalists for its deference to the Israeli government and the Israel Defense Forces in its coverage of the occupied Palestinian territories, and the cable network admitted Thursday that it follows a protocol that could give Israeli censors influence over its stories.

A spokesperson for the network confirmed to The Intercept that its news coverage about Israel and Palestine is run through and reviewed by the CNN Jerusalem bureau—which is subject to the IDF's censor.

The censor restricts foreign news outlets from reporting on certain subjects of its choosing and outright censors articles or news segments if they don't meet its guidelines.

Other news organizations often avoid the censor by reporting certain stories about the region through their news desks outside of Israel, The Intercept reported.

"The policy of running stories about Israel or the Palestinians past the Jerusalem bureau has been in place for years," the spokesperson told the outlet. "It is simply down to the fact that there are many unique and complex local nuances that warrant extra scrutiny to make sure our reporting is as precise and accurate as possible."

The spokesperson added that CNN does not share news copy with the censor and called the network's interactions with the IDF "minimal."

But James Zogby, founder of the Arab American Institute, said the IDF's approach to censoring media outlets is "Israel's way of intimidating and controlling news."

A CNN staffer who spoke to The Intercept on condition of anonymity confirmed that the network's longtime relationship with the censor has ensured CNN's coverage of Israel's bombardment of Gaza and attacks in the West Bank since October 7 favors Israel's narratives.

"Every single Israel-Palestine-related line for reporting must seek approval from the [Jerusalem] bureau—or, when the bureau is not
staffed, from a select few handpicked by the bureau and senior management—from which lines are most often edited with a very specific nuance," the staffer said.

Jerusalem bureau chief Richard Greene announced it had expanded its review team to include editors outside of Israel, calling the new policy "Jerusalem SecondEyes." The expanded review process was ostensibly put in place to bring "more expert eyes" to CNN's reporting particularly when the Jerusalem news desk is not staffed.

In practice, the staff member told The Intercept, "'War-crime' and 'genocide' are taboo words. Israeli bombings in Gaza will be reported as 'blasts' attributed to nobody, until the Israeli military weighs in to either accept or deny responsibility. Quotes and information provided by Israeli army and government officials tend to be approved quickly, while those from Palestinians tend to be heavily scrutinized and slowly processed."

Meanwhile, reporters are under intensifying pressure to question anything they learn from Palestinian sources, including casualty statistics from the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

The Ministry of Health is run by Hamas, which controls Gaza's government. The United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees said in October, as U.S. President Joe Biden was publicly questioning the accuracy of the ministry's reporting on deaths and injuries, that its casualty statistics have "proven consistently credible in the past."

Despite this, CNN's senior director of news standards and practices, David Lindsey, told journalists in a November 2 memo that "Hamas representatives are engaging in inflammatory rhetoric and propaganda... We should be careful not to give it a platform."

Another email sent in October suggested that the network aimed to present the Ministry of Health's casualty figures as questionable, with the News Standards and Practices division telling staffers, "Hamas controls the government in Gaza and we should describe the Ministry of Health as 'Hamas-controlled' whenever we are referring to casualty statistics or other claims related to the present conflict."

Newsroom employees were advised to "remind our audiences of the immediate cause of this current conflict, namely the Hamas attack and mass murder and kidnap of Israeli civilians" on October 7.

At least 22,600 people have been confirmed killed in Gaza and 57,910 have been wounded in Israeli attacks on Gaza since October 7. Thousands more are feared dead under the rubble left behind by airstrikes. In Israel, the death toll from Hamas' attack stands at 1,139.

Jim Naureckas, editor of the watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting, noted that the Israeli government is controlling journalists' reporting on Gaza as it's been "credibly accused of singling out journalists for violent attacks in order to suppress information."

"To give that government a heightened role in deciding what is news and what isn't news is really disturbing," he told The Intercept.

Meanwhile, pointed out author and academic Sunny Singh, even outside CNN, "every bit of reporting on Gaza in Western media outlets has been given unmerited weight which not granted to Palestinian reporters."

"Western media—not just CNN—has been pushing Israeli propaganda all through" Israel's attacks, said Singh.


ADL Report Decried for Equating Anti-Zionism (AND ANTI-STATISM) With Antisemitism

"This is a well-documented strategy by the pro-Israel camp to weaponize antisemitism to shield Israel from accountability," said one critic.




A protester holds a sign reading "Anti-Zionism Is Not Anti-Semitism" during a November 4, 2023 demonstration in Berlin.
(Photo: Sean Gallup/Getty Images)
COMMONDREAMS
Jan 10, 2024

The Anti-Defamation League came under fire Wednesday after publishing a report that significantly expanded the group's definition of antisemitic incidents to include demonstrations against Israel's U.S.-backed genocidal war on Gaza.

"For the first time, the ADL is counting pro-Palestinian rallies that do not feature overt hostility toward Jews in its count of antisemitic incidents," Jewish Daily Forward antisemitism reporter Arno Rosenfeld noted on social media in response to the organization's new report, which lists what it claims are 3,283 anti-Jewish occurrences in the United States in the three months after the Hamas-led attacks on Israel that left more than 1,100 Israelis and others dead and over 200 others taken hostage.

That three-month figure tops every full-year total except 2022 and represents a 360% increase over the same period a year ago. In an embargoed statement viewed by Rosenfeld, ADL national director and CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said that the tally highlights a threat to Jews that's "unprecedented in modern history."

Antisemitic—and Islamophobic—incidents have undoubtedly surged in the wake of the October 7 attacks and Israel's bloody collective punishment in Gaza and the occupied West Bank, in which more than 90,000 Palestinians have been killed, maimed, or left missing. However, critics accuse the ADL and many other pro-Israel groups and individuals of conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

In a statement to the Forward, the ADL acknowledged that its report includes pro-Palestine protests at which "anti-Zionist chants and slogans" were observed. Rosenfeld said that these events appeared to account for 1,317—or over 40%—of the total incidents in the report.

Zionism is the settler-colonial movement for the reestablishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. A growing number of Jewish Americans are rejecting Zionism for what critics say are its inherent racism, settler-colonialism, and the illegal occupation, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and genocide perpetrated by Israel in the name of divine right and favor. Jewish Americans and groups like Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow have been at the forefront of pro-Palestine demonstrations since October 7.

"Today you will see many journalists and pundits promoting a number: 360%. It is from the ADL's report on the increase of antisemitism," Yonah Lieberman, co-founder of the Jewish-led peace group IfNotNow, wrote on social media Wednesday. "While antisemitism has risen, the number is vastly inflated because of the ADL's intentional conflation between anti-Israel and antisemitism.



"This is a well-documented strategy by the pro-Israel camp to weaponize antisemitism to shield Israel from accountability," Lieberman added

IfNotNow co-founder Simone Zimmerman wrote: "There is no doubt that antisemitism in America has increased since October 7th. What is dubious is the reliability of data published by the ADL, who repeatedly makes clear that they care more about criminalizing pro-Palestinian speech and activism than fighting real antisemitism."


Hadar Susskind, president and CEO of the left-wing nonprofit Americans for Peace Now, said that "two things can be true at the same time. Antisemitic incidents have greatly increased, and the ADL is not a reliable source of determining what is or is not antisemitism."

Last month, just 13 U.S. House Democrats and one Republican voted against a resolution conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

BRETT WILKINS is a staff writer for Common Dreams.
US Lawmakers Received Over $58 Million From Israel Lobby Last Election Cycle

One progressive group said the money was "one of the main reasons most members of Congress don't represent the majority of Americans who want a cease-fire."

U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) seen speaking during the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference in Washington, D.C.
(Photo: Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

COMMON DREAMS
Jan 10, 2024

Members of Congress who expressed more support for Israel during the first six weeks of its war on Gaza received $125,000 on average from pro-Israeli lobby groups and individuals during their last elections, The Guardian reported Wednesday. In contrast, lawmakers who expressed more pro-Palestinian views only received $18,000 on average from these groups.

The Guardian analysis does not prove that legislators changed their views because they received donations; it is also the case that pro-Israel groups are more likely to fund campaigns run by people who express pro-Israel views. However, experts and advocates argue that the lobbying is one reason why around 82% of Congress was more supportive of Israel while only 9% was more supportive of Palestine.


"One of the main reasons most members of Congress don't represent the majority of Americans who want a cease-fire: The Israel lobby gave Congress $58 million last cycle; only 33 members didn't receive donations," the group Justice Democrats posted in response to the analysis. "This dark money poisons our democracy."



The analysis looked at the spending of 33 pro-Israel groups ranging from the more conservative American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI) to the more liberal J Street as well as pro-Israel individuals. It assessed legislators' views by looking at their public statements, letters to President Joe Biden, and social media posts.

Overall, it found that Israel garnered much more support in Congress for its bombardment and invasion of Gaza—which has now killed 1% of Gaza's pre-war population according to CNN—than it has from the U.S. populace overall. The war began on October 7 after Hamas launched an attack on southern Israel that killed around 1,100 Israelis and took around 240 hostage. Before that attack, Gaza had been under Israeli blockade for 16 years.

During the first six weeks of the war—while human rights groups were already warning of its humanitarian consequences—93% of U.S. lawmakers advocated for military or financial support to Israel, 81% backed Israel's military response, 17% either criticized that response or advocated for a cease-fire, and 17% made statements that provided context for the conflict.

"If there was no lobby pushing Congress in a particular direction in a really forceful way, the position of the U.S. Congress on the war in Gaza would be fundamentally different."

There was a wide funding gap between the two groups. Lawmakers who called for U.S. aid to Israel had received $113,000 on average from pro-Israel groups compared to the $39,000 received by those who did not. Lawmakers who supported Israel's response received $127,000 compared to $26,000 to those who did not. Lawmakers who did not criticize the response or call for a cease-fire received $123,000 on average compared to $34,000 for those who did. And lawmakers who did not contextualize the war received $123,000 on average compared to $36,000 for those who did.

DMFI president Mark Mellman explained to The Guardian that the U.S.-lobby system "works that way for every issue, for every progressive issue, for every conservative issue, so there is absolutely nothing unique about pro-Israel community in this respect."

"Not acknowledging that would be antisemitic," Mellman said.

However, the Israeli lobby is a large one, spending more than oil and gas interests in 2022. AIPAC in particular has a reputation for spending money to defeat lawmakers who are more critical of Israel in primary campaigns.

"There aren't that many lobbies that are willing to spend millions of dollars to unseat you in a primary," progresive strategist Waleed Shahid told The Guardian.

Shahid said that candidates were often advised to make pro-Israel statements, and fear of a primary challenge may influence candidates' positions. The Intercept's Ryan Grim has previously noted that Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who has been a vocal supporter of Israel since October 7, allowed DMFI to edit his Israel-Palestine platform while running a primary against a more centrist candidate. The move was potentially aimed at keeping DMFI and AIPAC from backing his opponent, which they did not, in the end, do.

The Guardian's analysis found that the top six congressional recipients of Israeli lobby money in 2022 were centrist Democrats who defeated more progressive primary opponents, and that these donations made up 42% of the lobby's total spending.

"If there was no lobby pushing Congress in a particular direction in a really forceful way, the position of the U.S. Congress on the war in Gaza would be fundamentally different," John Mearsheimer, a political scientist at the University of Chicago political who co-authored the book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, told The Guardian.

Days before The Guardian's report, Arab American Institute founder James Zogby wrote on social media that much of the money raised against progressives from pro-Israel groups comes from wealthy Republican donors.

"Why won't Dem leaders call them out? They would if it were for any other issue: guns, big pharma, etc.—but Israel gets a pass," Zogby said.

"We tried to get the DNC to ban dark money in primaries. We were shot down and no vote was allowed," Zogby continued. "This money is damaging our democracy and allowing supporters of Israel to shield Israel from sanctions or even criticism."