Friday, May 31, 2024

Canada says it backs Biden's Gaza cease-fire proposal

'The proposal put forward by @POTUS is an opportunity to end the suffering and return to a path to peace,' says Canadian prime minister


Servet Gunerigok |01.06.2024 - 



WASHINGTON

Canada voiced support Friday for a roadmap for a cease-fire and the release of hostages in the Gaza Strip announced by US President Joe Biden.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reiterated that Canada has been calling for an immediate cease-fire, an urgent increase in unhindered humanitarian assistance and the release of all hostages.

"The proposal put forward by @POTUS is an opportunity to end the suffering and return to a path to peace. All parties must seize it," the Canadian prime minister wrote X, referring to the President of The United States.

Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly said the level of human suffering from the Israel-Hamas conf is catastrophic and it must come to an end.

"Canada has been calling for an immediate ceasefire for months - the violence must stop. Hostages must be released and Hamas must lay down its weapons," she also wrote on X. "Unimpeded humanitarian relief must be provided to Palestinian civilians. Canada fully supports the proposal outlined by @POTUS today. It must be accepted. All parties must seize this opportunity to bring an end to human suffering and build a path towards an irreversible two-state solution," wrote Joly.

Biden said earlier that Israel presented the Palestinian resistance group, Hamas, with a three-phase deal that would end hostilities in the besieged Gaza Strip and secure the release of hostages held in the coastal enclave.

The US president appealed to Hamas to accept the deal and urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stave off pressure from members of his governing coalition who are opposed to the plan.

More than 36,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since Israel began its onslaught nearly eight months ago. The majority of those killed have been women and children, with more than 82,000 others injured, according to local health authorities.

The Hamas-led Oct. 7 attack killed less than 1,200 people.

Vast swathes of Gaza lay in ruins amid Israel's crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine.

Israel is accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which in its latest ruling has ordered Tel Aviv to immediately halt its operation in Rafah where more than 1 million Palestinians had sought refuge from the war.


'It is an extraordinary proposal which is potentially ground-shifting'

Issued on: 01/06/2024 

President Joe Biden on Friday detailed a three-phase deal proposed by Israel to Hamas militants that he says would lead to the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza and could end the grinding, nearly 8-month-old Mideast war. "It is an extraordinary proposal which is potentially ground-shifting", said FRANCE24's Chief Foreign Editor Rob Parsons. "It lays out a roadmap not just to peace but to the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip as well." 

Biden details Israel's Gaza ceasefire proposal, Hamas responds positively

Hamas on Friday said it "considers positively" an Israeli roadmap towards a full Gaza ceasefire announced by US President Joe Biden, who urged an end to the almost eight-month war.


Israel invaded the Gaza Strip in what Netanyahu has called an effort to destroy Hamas. (Photo: Reuters)


Reuters
New Delhi,
UPDATED: Jun 1, 2024

In ShortBiden describes three-phase Israeli proposal for ceasefire in Gaza
The proposal has won positive initial reaction from Hamas
Biden says "it's time for this war to end"


US President Joe Biden on Friday laid out what he described as a three-phase Israeli proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza in return for the release of Israeli hostages, saying "it's time for this war to end" and winning a positive initial reaction from Hamas.

The first phase involves a six-week ceasefire when Israeli forces would withdraw from "all populated areas" of Gaza, some hostages - including the elderly and women - would be freed in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, Palestinian civilians could return to their homes in Gaza and 600 trucks a day would bring humanitarian aid into the devastated enclave.

In this phase, Hamas and Israel would negotiate a permanent ceasefire that Biden said would last "as long has Hamas lives up to its commitments." If negotiations took more than six weeks, the temporary ceasefire would extend while they continued.

In the second phase, Biden said there would be an exchange for all remaining living hostages, including male soldiers, Israeli forces would withdraw from Gaza and the permanent ceasefire would begin.

The third phase would include a major reconstruction plan for Gaza and the return of the "final remains" of hostages to their families.



"It's time for this war to end and for the day after to begin," said Biden, who is under election-year pressure to stop the Gaza conflict, now in its eighth month.

Hamas, which Biden said received the proposal from Qatar, released a statement reacting positively.

Hamas said it was ready to engage "positively and in a constructive manner" with any proposal based on a permanent ceasefire, withdrawal of Israeli forces, the reconstruction of Gaza, a return of those displaced, and a "genuine" prisoner swap deal if Israel "clearly announces commitment to such deal".

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said he had authorized his negotiating team to present the deal, "while insisting that the war will not end until all of its goals are achieved, including the return of all our hostages and the destruction of Hamas' military and governmental capabilities."

Separately, the Israeli military said its forces have ended operations in north Gaza's Jabalia area after days of intense fighting, while probing further into Rafah in south Gaza to target what they say is the last major Hamas redoubt.

The conflict began on Oct. 7 when gunmen led by the Islamist Palestinian group stormed into southern Israel on motorcycles, paragliders and four-wheel drive vehicles, killing 1200 people and abducting more than 250, according to Israeli tallies.

Israel then invaded the Gaza Strip in what Netanyahu has called an effort to destroy Hamas, the militant Palestinian group that seized control of the area from the Fatah Palestinian faction in a violent struggle in 2007.

Talks mediated by Egypt, Qatar and others to arrange a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas have repeatedly stalled, with each side blaming the other for the lack of progress.

AN INDEFINITE WAR


In his speech, Biden called on the Israeli leadership to resist pressure from those in Israel who were pushing for the war to go on "indefinitely," a group he said included some in the Israeli governing coalition.

"They want to occupy Gaza. They want to keep fighting for years and hostages are not a priority for them. Well, I've urged leadership in Israel to stand behind this deal, despite whatever pressure comes," he added.

He implored Israelis not to miss the chance for a ceasefire.

"As the only American president who has ever gone to Israel at a time of war, as someone who just sent the U.S. forces to directly defend Israel when it was attacked by Iran, I ask you to take a step back, think what will happen if this moment is lost," he said. "We can't lose this moment."

The Gaza war has put Biden in a political bind.


On the one hand, he has long been a staunch supporter of Israel and would like to ensure funding and support from the pro-Israel community in the United States in his Nov. 5 election rematch against Republican former President Donald Trump.

On the other, progressive elements of Biden's Democratic Party have grown increasingly angry at the president for the suffering the conflict has caused civilians in Gaza.

Palestinian health authorities estimate more than 36,280 people have been killed in Gaza since Israel attacked, and the United Nations says over a million people face "catastrophic" levels of hunger as famine takes hold in parts of the enclave.

Signaling a US effort to build support for the proposal, the State Department said US Secretary of State Antony Blinken spoke with his Jordanian, Saudi and Turkish counterparts.

Speaking to the Turkish foreign minister, "he emphasized that Hamas should accept the deal and that every country with a relationship with Hamas should press it to do so without delay,' the State Department said.

In a sign of support for Israel despite the partisan divide in the United States, leaders of the Democratic-led US Senate and of the Republican-led House of Representatives on Friday invited Netanyahu to address a joint meeting of Congress.

The week has been dominated by the fallout from an Israeli air strike in Rafah on Sunday that killed 45 Palestinians.

"The Palestinian people have endured sheer hell in this war," Biden said on Friday. "We all saw the terrible images from the deadly fire in Rafah earlier this week."


 

US President Joe Biden announces three-phase deal proposed by Israel to end war on Gaza

Biden called the latest proposal ‘a road map to an enduring ceasefire and the release of all hostages’.

United States President Joe Biden on Friday said Israel had proposed a three-phase ceasefire deal to the Palestinian militant group Hamas, reported the Associated Press.

Israel’s war on Gaza began after Hamas’ incursion into southern Israel on October 7 that killed 1,200 people. The militant group had also taken over 200 people hostage.

A hundred of those hostages are still believed to be alive and in Gaza, according to Al Jazeera. Some of the hostages were released in November as part of a brief ceasefire agreement and others were killed as a result of the war.

Since October, Israel has been carrying out unprecedented air and ground strikes on Gaza. The attacks have killed at least 36,700 persons, including over 15,000 children.

During a press conference at the White House on Friday, Biden said that Hamas was “no longer capable” of carrying out another large-scale attack on Israel. He also called the latest proposal “a road map to an enduring ceasefire and the release of all hostages”.

The US president said that the first phase of the proposal, lasting for six weeks, would entail a “full and complete ceasefire”. It would also include the withdrawal of Israeli forces from all the populated areas of Gaza.

Humanitarian assistance would also flow in during the first phase, with 600 trucks being allowed into the besieged enclave each day.

The first phase would also see the release of hostages – including women, the elderly and the wounded – in exchange for the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. Biden said that American hostages would be released at this stage.

The second phase would entail the release of the remaining hostages, including male soldiers. It would also include the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza.

Hamas and Israel would negotiate terms of a permanent end to hostilities during this phase, reported Reuters. "The ceasefire will still continue as long as negotiations continue,” said Biden.

According to the president, “as long as Hamas lives up to its commitments, the temporary ceasefire would become, in the words of the Israeli proposal, ‘the cessation of hostilities permanently’,” said Biden.

The president said that the third phase called for the beginning of the reconstruction of Gaza.

After Biden’s speech, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyah’s office said that he had authorised the country’s team negotiating for its hostages to find a way to release those remaining in Gaza, AP reported.

The prime minister’s office added that the “exact outline” proposed by Israel had to be followed.

However, it said that “the war will not end until all of its goals are achieved, including the return of all our abductees and the elimination of Hamas’ military and governmental capabilities”.

On the other hand, Hamas welcomed Biden’s statement and his call for “a permanent ceasefire, withdrawal of [Israeli] occupation forces from the Gaza Strip, reconstruction and prisoners exchange”, Al Jazeera reported.

The Palestinian militant group said that it was willing to respond “positively and constructively” to a proposal that included these measures as long as Israel also “explicitly” committed to it.

The development comes days after Israel conducted air strikes on a camp housing displaced Palestinian civilians in Rafah city killing at least 45.

Rafah was considered the last refuge for Palestinians in Gaza after Israel launched ground operation starting from the northern areas of the territory. The southern city was also the main point of entry for fuel before the Israeli military captured the Gaza side of the Rafah crossing with Egypt.

Despite global outrage over the attack, Israel continued its operation in Gaza ignoring calls to halt the offensive in the city in the besieged Palestinian territory

On Thursday, India said that the loss of lives in the Israeli air strikes on displaced Palestinians in southern Gaza was “heartbreaking” and a “matter of deep concern”.

Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that India had always supported a two-state solution, which included the establishment of a “sovereign, viable, and independent state of Palestine within recognised and mutually agreed borders, living side by side with Israel in peace”.

 Hamas expresses readiness to deal "positively" with Biden's proposal




2024-05-31 

Shafaq News/ On Saturday, Hamas commented on U.S. President Joe Biden's proposal regarding a ceasefire in Gaza.

In a statement, Hamas said, "We positively view what was included in the U.S. President's speech. We are ready to respond positively to any proposal that includes a permanent ceasefire, the complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, reconstruction, the return of displaced persons, and the exchange of prisoners and hostages."

Earlier on Friday, Biden unveiled an Israeli roadmap for a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages, asserting that the plan would facilitate Tel Aviv's integration into the region and pave the way for a historic normalization agreement with Saudi Arabia.

"It is time to start a new phase where the hostages return to their homes, this war ends, and the next day begins," Biden said.

The U.S. President detailed the three-phase Israeli proposal to end the conflict: the first phase includes the return of Palestinians in Gaza to their homes; the second involves the exchange of all live prisoners, including Israeli soldiers; and the third focuses on the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.

Furthermore, Biden noted that the proposal includes a six-week cessation of hostilities in the first phase, expressing his concern about the potential for increased global isolation of Israel if the plan is not executed.

"Israel wants to ensure that Hamas cannot carry out another attack similar to that of October 7th. Therefore, I urge the Israeli leadership to stand behind the new deal proposal despite any pressures," Biden emphasized.

U.S. President confirmed that the proposal has been conveyed to Qatar and Hamas, underscoring the importance of focusing on a truce and ending the war in Gaza.

Addressing Israel directly, Biden said, "As someone who has had a long-standing commitment to Israel, as the only American president who visited Israel during a time of war, and as someone who sent American forces to defend Israel when Iran attacked it directly, I ask you to pause and consider what will happen if this opportunity is lost... We cannot waste this opportunity. It is time to end the Gaza war."

Hours after the proposal, the Israeli Prime Minister's Office issued a statement asserting Netanyahu's determination "not to end the war until all its objectives are achieved."

"The Israeli government is united in its desire to return the captives as quickly as possible and is working to achieve this goal," the statement added.

Netanyahu has tasked the negotiating team with outlining the steps to achieve the goal of returning the captives held in the Gaza Strip, according to the statement.


Israel PM insists Gaza war will not end until ‘elimination’ of Hamas

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Friday the Gaza war would not end until the “elimination” of Hamas’s capacity to govern and make war, after US President Joe Biden said Israel had offered a new peace roadmap.

“The prime minister authorised the negotiating team to present an outline for achieving (the return of hostages), while insisting that the war will not end until all of its goals are achieved, including the return of all our hostages and the elimination of Hamas’ military and governmental capabilities,” Netanyahu’s office said in a statement.

“The exact outline proposed by Israel, including the conditional transition from stage to stage, allows Israel to maintain these principles,” it added.

In his first major address outlining a solution to the eight-month conflict, Biden said the proposal started with a six-week phase that would see Israeli forces withdraw from all populated areas of Gaza.

“It’s time for this war to end, for the day after to begin,” Biden said in a televised address from the White House, adding that “we can’t lose this moment” to seize the chance for peace.

The Gaza war was sparked by Hamas’s October 7 attack on southern Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,189 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.

Militants also took 252 hostages, 121 of whom remain in Gaza, including 37 the army says are dead.

Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed at least 36,284 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry.

 BIDEN: HAMAS NO LONGER CAPABLE OF CARRYING OUT ANOTHER OCT. 7

‘Time for this war to end’: Biden tells Hamas to accept Israel’s hostage-ceasefire offer

President sets out Israel’s proposal, urges gov’t to stand behind it; says Gaza ops can resume if terror group breaks deal; PMO: War won’t end until all goals met; Hamas ‘positive’


US President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the Israel-Hamas war, from the State Dining Room of the White House, May 31, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
US President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the Israel-Hamas war, from the State Dining Room of the White House, May 31, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Declaring that it is “time for this war to end,” US President Joe Biden gave a high-stakes speech Friday, presenting what he said was the latest Israeli proposal for a hostage deal and ceasefire to end the Israel-Hamas war, and calling on the terror group to accept the offer.

The Israeli proposal was submitted on Thursday to Hamas via Qatar, Biden revealed, saying the offer would “bring all the hostages home, ensure Israel’s security, create a better day after in Gaza without Hamas in power, and set the stage for a political settlement that provides a better future for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”

Biden laid out the details of three phases, with particular emphasis on the first six-week phase, which was largely similar to the framework that was discussed in previous rounds of negotiations but included new conditions detailed by the president for the first time.

Several times during the speech in the State Dining Room of the White House, Biden put the ball in Hamas’s court, urging it to accept the type of ceasefire that its leaders and supporters have repeatedly called for.

While he described the latest proposal as one crafted by Israel, and thus presumably approved by the narrow war cabinet, he evidently recognized that this was not the final say from Jerusalem and urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s full government to stand behind the offer its negotiators submitted indirectly to Hamas.

Biden said the deal also carried with it the opportunity for subsequent gains for both Israelis and Palestinians. For Israel, it would allow for a return to calm on the Lebanon border and a normalization agreement with Saudi Arabia. For the Palestinians, it would enable them to advance toward self-determination.

Netanyahu’s office issued a statement immediately after Biden’s speech, but it avoided responding directly to the president’s message.

Instead, it said that the latest Israeli proposal fulfills both of Israel’s war aims of returning all remaining 125 hostages and eliminating Hamas’s military and governmental capabilities. It did not specify that the proposal it was referencing was the one Biden detailed.

For its part, Hamas issued a statement welcoming Biden’s speech and said it would negotiate in good faith to secure a permanent ceasefire and the permanent withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

A senior US official speaking on condition of anonymity told The Times of Israel that “both Israel and Hamas will try and frame the proposal in a manner that suits them, so it’s best to listen to the way it was laid out by the president.”

Phase one

The first phase of the deal would include a complete ceasefire; the withdrawal of Israeli forces from all populated areas of Gaza; the release of a number of female, elderly and sick hostages by Hamas; and the release of hundreds of Palestinian security prisoners by Israel, Biden said, noting that American hostages would be among those released in this first stage.

Additionally, a number of bodies of deceased hostages would also be released, Biden said, revealing for the first time that Israel had moved from its previous demand not to accept any bodies during this “humanitarian” phase of the hostage deal.

During negotiations in recent weeks, Israel demanded the release of 33 female, elderly and wounded hostages who are still alive in Gaza. Hamas claimed that it did not have that many living hostages in those categories. Israel demanded that Hamas release living hostages from other categories if that were the case. But the terror group refused, saying it would only be willing to release additional bodies to make up for the discrepancy.

Further detailing the first phase, Biden said that Palestinians would be allowed to return to their homes and neighborhoods throughout Gaza, including in the north. Israel in earlier rounds of negotiations had pushed back on the unrestricted return of Palestinians, particularly to the north, fearing it would lead to Hamas regrouping. In the last round of indirect contacts, though, Israel reportedly let go of this demand as well.

Biden said 60 trucks of humanitarian aid would be surged into Gaza each day of the first phase. Hundreds of thousands of temporary shelters, including housing units, would also be delivered by the international community.

During the six-week phase, Israel and Hamas would “negotiate the necessary arrangements to get to phase two, which is a permanent end to hostilities,” Biden said.

Critically, he revealed a new detail of the first phase, which is that if those likely complex negotiations regarding the terms of the next phase took longer than six weeks, the ceasefire would be extended.

“The United States, Egypt, and Qatar [will] work to ensure negotiations keep going… until all the agreements are reached and phase two is able to begin,” Biden said.

This handout picture released by the Egyptian Presidency on November 10, 2023, shows Egypt’s President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi (R) receiving Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani in the Presidential Hall at Cairo International Airport. (Photo by Handout / Egyptian Presidency / AFP)

This provision appeared to mark an attempt by the mediators to coax Hamas to agree to the first phase of the proposal. The terror group has been adamant that it will only agree to a permanent ceasefire, while Israel insists that it will only agree to a temporary one in exchange for the release of the first batch of hostages.

This new clause would appear to enable the indefinite extension of the six-week phase, so long as Hamas is seen as negotiating in good faith.

“If Hamas fails to uphold its commitments under the deal, Israel can resume military operations. But Egypt and Qatar have assured me they are continuing to work to ensure that Hamas doesn’t do that,” Biden said. “The United States will help ensure that Israel lives up to their obligations as well.”

Biden did not detail the rate at which the Israeli hostages would be released during the first phase. Hamas in previous negotiations has sought to spread out the release of the Israeli hostages as much as possible.

However, the framework laid out by Biden would seem to encourage Hamas to complete the negotiations in the course of phase one regarding the continuation of the deal, as the complete proposal would ostensibly enable the terror group’s survival in some form.

Demonstrators hold images of five female soldiers held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza, calling to ‘save those who still can be’ as they protest calling for the release of all hostages held in the Gaza Strip outside the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, May 25, 2024. (Erik Marmor/Flash90)

Briefing reporters on condition of anonymity shortly after Biden’s speech, a senior US official acknowledged that the negotiations during phase one would be very difficult and require the sides to agree on a ratio for how many Palestinian security prisoners would be released in exchange for the remaining male Israeli hostages in phase two.


“It’s fair to say that if [we get to] phase two and phase three, Israel will have some guarantees about its own security [so] that Gaza can no longer be a platform for terrorism and threats against Israel,” the senior administration official clarified.

Phases two and three

In phase two, Hamas would release the remaining living Israeli hostages, including male soldiers. Israel, in exchange, would withdraw its forces entirely from Gaza and release the agreed-upon number of Palestinian security prisoners.

“As long as Hamas lives up to its commitments, a temporary ceasefire would become… permanent,” Biden said.

Netanyahu’s office has denied several times to date that the proposals Israel agreed to in the past included a willingness to implement a permanent ceasefire. But Biden specified this as an element of the second stage of what he stressed was the Israeli proposal.

“Finally, in phase three, a major reconstruction plan for Gaza would commence. And any final remains of hostages who have been killed would be returned to their families,” the president said.

Palestinians waiting for aid trucks to cross in central Gaza Strip, May 19, 2024. (Abdel Kareem Hana/AP)

Elaborating on phase three, the senior administration official said it would include “a pretty extensive three-to-five year reconstruction program for Gaza… fully backed by the US, the international community and others.”

The senior official said phases two and three would also last six weeks, adding that the Israeli proposal on the table is highly detailed and four-and-a-half pages long.

Direct appeal to Israelis

Biden took time in his speech to try and sell the deal directly to Israel’s leaders and the public, asserting that sticking with the proposal would not put the country’s security at risk.

Israel has “devastated Hamas’s [forces] over the past eight months. At this point, Hamas is no longer capable of carrying out another October 7,” Biden said, making this assertion for the first time. “This was one of Israel’s main objectives in this war — and quite frankly, a righteous one.”

“I don’t think this offer would have been possible three months ago,” the senior administration official briefing reporters added.

Biden in his speech addressed the likely pushback that the proposal would face, apparently differentiating between the war cabinet that authorized the Mossad-Shin Bet-IDF negotiating team to craft the latest offer and the broader Israeli security cabinet, which includes far-right members to whom Netanyahu is beholden for his political survival.

Far-right leaders Itamar Ben Gvir (R) and Bezalel Smotrich (L) at the ‘victory conference’ at the International Convention Center in Jerusalem, January 28, 2024. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

“I know there are those in Israel who will not agree with this plan and will call for the war to continue indefinitely. Some are even in the governing coalition. They’ve made it clear that they want to occupy Gaza, they want to keep fighting for years, and the hostages are not a priority to them,” Biden said in a blistering critique. He avoided naming Netanyahu and his far-right partners Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir in the speech.

“I’ve urged the leadership in Israel to stand behind this deal, despite whatever pressure comes,” Biden said, clearly referring to Netanyahu.

“If Hamas comes to negotiate ready to deal, then Israel’s negotiators must be given a mandate with the necessary flexibility to close that deal,” he said, referring to the Netanyahu-led war cabinet, which is tasked with providing the negotiating team with parameters for the talks.

Turning to the Israeli people, Biden stressed that he was presenting this offer “as someone who has had a lifelong commitment to Israel, as the only American president who has ever gone to Israel at a time of war, as someone who just sent US forces to directly defend Israel when it was attacked by Iran.”

“I ask you to take a step back and think what will happen if this moment is lost.”

“Indefinite war in pursuit of an unidentified notion of ‘total victory’ will only bog down Israel in Gaza, draining military, economic and human resources and further Israel’s isolation in the world,” the president said in a more direct attack on Netanyahu, who has repeatedly vowed to achieve “total victory” in Gaza.

“That will not bring hostages home. That will not bring an enduring defeat of Hamas. That will not bring Israel lasting security,” Biden asserted.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem, May 6, 2024. (Amir Cohen / POOL / AFP)

A ceasefire is just the beginning

Biden went on to explain that the hostage deal on the table is part of a comprehensive approach that will ensure Israel’s long-term security.

“Once a ceasefire and hostage deal is concluded, it unlocks the possibility of a great deal of more progress, including calm along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon. The United States will help forge a diplomatic resolution… that ensures Israel’s security and allows people to safely return to their homes without fear of being attacked.”

“With the deal, the rebuilding of Gaza will begin. Arab nations and the international community along with Palestinian and Israeli leaders [will work together] to get it done in a manner that does not allow Hamas to rearm,” Biden said.

“The United States will work with our partners to rebuild homes, schools and hospitals in Gaza, to help repair communities that were destroyed in the chaos of war.”

“With this deal, Israel could become more deeply integrated in the region,” Biden went on, highlighting the normalization deal he is working to broker between Israel and Saudi Arabia. “Israel could be part of a regional security network to counter the threat posed by Iran.”

“All this progress would make Israel more secure, with Israeli families no longer living in the shadow of a terrorist attack. All of this would create the conditions for a different future, a better future for the Palestinian people, one of self-determination, dignity, security and freedom.”

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during a week-long trip aimed at calming tensions across the Middle East, in Al Ula, Saudi Arabia, Monday, Jan. 8, 2024. (Evelyn Hockstein/Pool Photo via AP)

“We have to work to reform the PA in the West Bank, which is ongoing and to having an interim administration in Gaza that can help with stabilization and pathway forward there,” the senior official elaborated soon after the speech.

Biden notably made no mention of a “two-state solution” or a “pathway to a future Palestinian state,” which have been regular talking points when the administration has laid out its post-war vision. Saudi officials had previously asserted that they would not normalize ties with Israel unless Jerusalem commits to an irreversible path to Palestinian statehood.

The absence of such rhetoric was un-ignorable, as was the proximity of Biden’s speech to an announcement from House Speaker Mike Johnson, minutes later, that Congress had submitted a formal invitation for Netanyahu to discuss the Israel-Hamas war in an address to a joint session of Congress.

The invitation had been held up for weeks by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a close ally of Biden’s who gave a speech in March calling for early elections in Israel to replace Netanyahu. A congressional aide told The Times of Israel that Schumer’s office coordinated with the White House on the matter.

Biden clarified that even after the war, “Israel will always have the right to defend itself against threats to its security and to bring those responsible for October 7 to justice.”

The line was an indication that the US would give Israel cover to continue pursuing Hamas’s leaders after the war.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks against the US-led international nuclear deal with Iran in 2015 before a joint meeting of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 3, 2015. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

This appeared to be part of a broader post-war approach to Hamas by the US, which seems reconciled to the terror group managing to limp on in some form. However, US officials asserted to The Times of Israel earlier this month that the broader diplomatic initiative Washington is advancing would see the terror group marginalized in Gaza and no longer able to pose a threat to Israel.

“The United States will always ensure that Israel has what it needs to defend itself,” Biden added, in his latest attempt to assure Israelis that he wasn’t abandoning them, weeks after he withheld a shipment of high-payload bombs and threatened to block more if Israel launched a major offensive in the populated areas of Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah.

‘Hamas needs to take the deal’

“The past eight months have been marked by heartbreaking pain of those whose loved ones were slaughtered by Hamas terrorists on October 7; hostages and their families waiting in anguish; ordinary Israelis whose lives are forever marked by the shattering event of Hamas’s sexual violence and ruthless brutality,” Biden said.

“The Palestinian people have endured sheer hell in this war,” he added. “Too many people have been killed, including thousands of children. Far too many have been badly wounded. We all saw the terrible images from a deadly fire in Rafah earlier this week following an Israeli strike targeting Hamas.”

“This is truly a decisive moment. Israel has made their proposal. Hamas says it wants a ceasefire. This deal is an opportunity to prove whether they really mean it,” Biden said. “Hamas needs to take the deal.”

The senior US official briefing reporters argued that the latest Israeli proposal was almost identical to the demands previously laid out by Hamas.

Emir Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani (L), ruler of Qatar since 2013, in a meeting with Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh (R) and Khaled Mashal in Doha, October 17, 2016 (Qatar government handout)

“This is now at the stage where Hamas has said they’d be prepared to do deal X, and what is now on the table is basically that, with some very minor adjustments,” the official said.

Asked about Hamas’s statement Thursday that it would not be willing to negotiate further with Israel unless the IDF halts all fighting in Gaza, the senior administration official downplayed the threat, suggesting there is a difference between what the terror group says publicly and what it says privately.

The official noted that Hamas only received the Israeli proposal on Thursday night and would likely need time to make a decision.

“But [Biden] felt very strongly… that it was time to lay out very clearly what is offered in this proposal, and particularly in those first six weeks,” the senior official said.

UC Santa Cruz workers who are union members of UAW 4811, which is part of the United Auto Workers, and pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel protesters carry signs as they demonstrate in front of the UC Santa Cruz campus on May 20, 2024, in Santa Cruz, California. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images via AFP)

Before wrapping up his speech, Biden turned to the pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel protesters around the world who have flooded the streets for months demanding a ceasefire. Those calls have largely been directed at Israel, with little mention of Hamas at all.

Biden urged a correction. “Now it’s time to raise your voices and demand that Hamas come to the table, agree to this deal, and end this war that they began.”

Indicating that pressure also needed to be put on Israel, however, Biden added, “Let the leaders know they should take this deal.”

“It’s time for this war to end, and for the day after to begin,” he concluded.

IDF troops operate in northern Gaza’s Jabaliya, in a handout photo published May 31, 2024. (Israel Defense Forces)

Israel ambiguous, Hamas positive

In a statement issued immediately after Biden’s speech, Netanyahu’s office said, “The Israeli government is united in the desire to return our hostages as soon as possible and is working to achieve this goal.”

“Therefore, the prime minister authorized the negotiating team to present an outline for achieving this goal, while insisting that the war will not end until all of its goals are achieved, including the return of all our hostages and the elimination of Hamas’ military and governmental capabilities,” the statement continued.

“The exact outline proposed by Israel, including the conditional transition from stage to stage, allows Israel to maintain these principles,” the statement added.

Netanyahu’s office did not clarify whether its proposal is the same one described by Biden during his speech — and did not refer directly to Biden’s speech at all.

Asked whether the deal described by Netanyahu’s office is the same one Biden laid out in his speech, a senior administration official briefing reporters avoided answering directly.

“I have no doubt that the deal will be characterized by Israel and will be characterized by Hamas, but we know what’s in the deal. We know what the expectations are,” the official said.

Palestinians look at the destruction after an Israeli strike adjacent to where displaced people were staying in Rafah, Gaza Strip, May 27, 2024. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

“Often these deals are characterized by those who might not want to see the deal,” the official had said earlier in the briefing.

In its statement, Hamas said it “positively views” the proposal presented by Biden, specifying “his call to a permanent ceasefire, the Israeli forces’ withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the reconstruction of Gaza and the exchange of prisoners.”

“The movement affirms its readiness to deal positively and constructively with any proposal based on [these components],” Hamas said.

The terror group added that it regards the development in negotiations and the US commitment to ending the war in Gaza sparked by its October 7 massacre “to be the result of the legendary steadfastness of our struggling people and their brave resistance.”



Field hospital or detention center? Inside Israel's only hospital to treat Palestinians in Gaza

While Israel says it detains only suspected militants, many patients have turned out to be non-combatants taken during raids, held without trial and eventually returned to war-torn Gaza

AP Gaza
 Published 01.06.24

A Palestinian man wounded in an Israeli strike is helped as he walks outside a field hospital where he receives treatment, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, May 30, 2024.
REUTERS/Hatem Khaled

Patients lying shackled and blindfolded on more than a dozen beds inside a white tent in the desert. Surgeries performed without adequate painkillers. Doctors who remain anonymous.


These are some of the conditions at Israel's only hospital dedicated to treating Palestinians detained by the military in the Gaza Strip, three people who have worked there told The Associated Press, confirming similar accounts from human rights groups.

While Israel says it detains only suspected militants, many patients have turned out to be non-combatants taken during raids, held without trial and eventually returned to war-torn Gaza.


Eight months into the Israel-Hamas war, accusations of inhumane treatment at the Sde Teiman military field hospital are on the rise, and the Israeli government is under growing pressure to shut it down. Rights groups and other critics say what began as a temporary place to hold and treat militants after Oct. 7 has morphed into a harsh detention center with too little accountability.

The military denies the allegations of inhumane treatment and says all detainees needing medical attention receive it.


The hospital is near the city of Beersheba in southern Israel. It opened beside a detention center on a military base after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel because some civilian hospitals refused to treat wounded militants. Of the three workers interviewed by AP, two spoke on condition of anonymity because they feared government retribution and public rebuke.


“We are condemned by the left because we are not fulfilling ethical issues,” said Dr. Yoel Donchin, an anesthesiologist who has worked at Sde Teiman hospital since its earliest days and still works there. “We are condemned from the right because they think we are criminals for treating terrorists.”


The military this week said it formed a committee to investigate detention center conditions, but it was unclear if that included the hospital. Next week Israel's highest court is set to hear arguments from human rights groups seeking to shut it down.


Israel has not granted journalists or the International Committee of the Red Cross access to the Sde Teiman facilities.


Israel has detained some 4,000 Palestinians since Oct. 7, according to official figures, though roughly 1,500 were released after the military determined they were not affiliated with Hamas. Israeli human rights groups say the majority of detainees have at some point passed through Sde Teiman, the country's largest detention center.


Doctors there say they have treated many who appeared to be non-combatants.


“Now we have patients that are not so young, sick patients with diabetes and high blood pressure,” said Donchin, the anesthesiologist.


A soldier who worked at the hospital recounted an elderly man who underwent surgery on his leg without pain medication. “He was screaming and shaking,” said the soldier.


Between medical treatments, the soldier said patients were housed in the detention center, where they were exposed to squalid conditions and their wounds often developed infections. There was a separate area where older people slept on thin mattresses under floodlights, and a putrid smell hung in the air, he said.


The military said in a statement that all detainees are “reasonably suspected of being involved in terrorist activity.” It said they receive check-ups upon arrival and are transferred to the hospital when they require more serious treatment.


A medical worker who saw patients at the facility in the winter recounted teaching hospital workers how to wash wounds.


Donchin, who largely defended the facility against allegations of mistreatment but was critical of some of its practices, said most patients are diapered and not allowed to use the bathroom, shackled around their arms and legs and blindfolded.


“Their eyes are covered all the time. I don't know what the security reason for this is,” he said.


The military disputed the accounts provided to AP, saying patients were handcuffed “in cases where the security risk requires it” and removed when they caused injury. Patients are rarely diapered, it said.


Dr. Michael Barilan, a professor at the Tel Aviv University Medical School who said he has spoken with over 15 hospital staff, disputed accounts of medical negligence. He said doctors are doing their best under difficult circumstances, and that the blindfolds originated out of a “fear (patients) would retaliate against those taking care of them."


Days after Oct. 7, roughly 100 Israelis clashed with police outside one of the country's main hospitals in response to false rumors it was treating a militant.


In the aftermath, some hospitals refused to treat detainees, fearful that doing so could endanger staff and disrupt operations. They were already overwhelmed by people wounded during the Hamas attack and expecting casualties to rise from an impending ground invasion.


As Israel pulled in scores of wounded Palestinians to Sde Teiman, it became clear the facility's infirmary was not large enough, according to Barilan. An adjacent field hospital was built from scratch.


Israel's Health Ministry laid out plans for the hospital in a December memo obtained by AP.


It said patients would be treated while handcuffed and blindfolded. Doctors, drafted into service by the military, would be kept anonymous to protect their "safety, lives and well-being." The ministry referred all questions to the military when reached for comment.


Still, an April report from Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, drawing on interviews with hospital workers, said doctors at the facility faced “ethical, professional and even emotional distress.” Barilan said turnover has been high.


Patients with more complicated injuries have been transferred from the field hospital to civilian hospitals, but it has been done covertly to avoid arousing the public's attention, Barilan said. And the process is fraught: The medical worker who spoke with AP said one detainee with a gunshot wound was discharged prematurely from a civilian hospital to Sde Teiman within hours of being treated, endangering his life.


The field hospital is overseen by military and health officials, but Donchin said parts of its operations are managed by KLP, a private logistics and security company whose website says it specializes in “high-risk environments.” The company did not respond to a request for comment.


Because it's not under the same command as the military's medical corps, the field hospital is not subject to Israel's Patients Rights Act, according to Physicians for Human Rights-Israel.


A group from the Israeli Medical Association visited the hospital earlier this year but kept its findings private. The association did not respond to requests for comment.


The military told AP that 36 people from Gaza have died in Israel's detention centers since Oct. 7, some of them because of illnesses or wounds sustained in the war. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel has alleged that some died from medical negligence.


Khaled Hammouda, a surgeon from Gaza, spent 22 days at one of Israel's detention centers. He does not know where he was taken because he was blindfolded while he was transported. But he said he recognized a picture of Sde Teiman and said he saw at least one detainee, a prominent Gaza doctor who is believed to have been there.


Hammouda recalled asking a soldier if a pale 18-year-old who appeared to be suffering from internal bleeding could be taken to a doctor. The soldier took the teenager away, gave him intravenous fluids for a few hours, and then returned him.


“I told them, He could die,'" Hammouda said. “They told me this is the limit.'”
GAZA SOLIDARITY

Teenager chains himself to goalpost during Scotland-Israel match to protest Israeli bombardment of Gaza

Women's Euro 2025 qualifier at Glasgow's Hampden Stadium resumed after 45 minutes, reports media

Merve Berker |01.06.2024 - 



Before the Women's Euro 2025 qualifier between Scotland and Israel at Glasgow's Hampden stadium, a demonstrator chained himself to the goalposts to protest Israel's military operation in Gaza, according to local media.

The atmosphere surrounding the Scotland-Israel match, which was held behind closed doors due to security concerns, was disrupted when a 19-year-old man chained himself to the goalposts and protested Israel's continued military attacks in Gaza, STV News reported on Friday.

When play resumed, the Israeli team's gesture of holding up T-shirts advocating for the release of hostages held by Hamas added another layer of complexity to the match.

Meanwhile, hundreds of people gathered outside the stadium, carrying Palestinian flags and symbolic coffins, reflecting a larger public outcry against the ongoing strife.

Despite the upheaval, the game eventually proceeded 45 minutes later, but not without echoes of dissent ringing through the air from both demonstrators and counter-protesters.

“I think it is cowardly that they have kept us out of our own national stadium,” the broadcaster quoted demonstrators as saying.

“They have silenced us, as fans and as protesters,” they decried.

The STV News quoted protestors calling on: “We should be in there making a noise in front of the television, instead they are keeping us outside and silent.”

“The decision to play the game in an empty stadium was reached following updated intelligence and ‘extensive security consultations’ with key parties involved,” the broadcaster said, citing a statement issued by the Scottish Football Association (SFA).

“Due to updated intelligence and following extensive security consultations with all key parties, the Scottish FA regrets to confirm that the forthcoming qualifier between Scotland and Israel at Hampden Park on May 31 will now be played behind closed doors,” the SFA stressed.

“The stadium operations team were alerted to the potential for planned disruptions to the match and as a consequence we have no option but to play the match without supporters in attendance.

“We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the decision but the safety of supporters, players, team staff and officials is of paramount importance,” it added.

Israel has continued its brutal offensive on Gaza since an attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, despite a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire.

More than 36,200 Palestinians have since been killed in Gaza, the vast majority being women and children, and nearly 81,800 others injured, according to local health authorities.

Nearly eight months into the Israeli war, vast swathes of Gaza lay in ruins amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water, and medicine.

Israel stands accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice, which in its latest ruling ordered it to immediately halt its operation in Rafah, where over a million Palestinians had sought refuge from the war before it was invaded on May 6.


 

Pro-Palestinian protesters enter Brooklyn Museum, unfurl banner as police make arrests

Pro-Palestine-protest-Brooklyn-main1-750

Police detain a pro-Palestinian demonstrator in front of the Brooklyn Museum during on Friday. AP

Hundreds of pro-Palestinian protesters marched to the Brooklyn Museum on Friday afternoon, set up tents in the lobby and unfurled a "Free Palestine” banner from the building's roof before police moved in to make arrests.

New York City police officers tackled and punched some protesters during scuffles that broke out in the crowd outside the museum while some demonstrators hurled plastic bottles at officers and shouted insults. Other protesters held banners, waved Palestinian flags and chanted boisterously on the steps of the grand, Beaux Arts museum, which is the city’s second largest.

The rally started Friday afternoon across the street from the Barclays Center, home of the NBA's Brooklyn Nets. Marchers banging drums and chanting then made their way to the museum about a mile away.

Organizers, including the group Within Our Lifetime, called on supporters to "flood” and "de-occupy” the museum, saying they wanted to take over the building until officials " disclose and divest ” from any investments linked to Israel's actions in Gaza.

Videos posted on social media showed guards at the museum trying to secure its doors against the surging crowd, and demonstrators finding other ways inside.

Pro-Palestine-protest-Brooklyn-main2-750
A Pro-Palestinian protestor is detained by New York Police Officers in front of the Brooklyn Museum. Reuters

Spokespersons for the museum didn’t respond to emails and phone messages seeking comment late Friday, but an NYPD spokesperson confirmed protesters had been taken into custody. The department didn't immediately have an estimate for how many have been arrested or what charges they might face.

New York City has seen hundreds of street demonstrations since the conflict between Israel and Hamas began in October.

The Brooklyn Museum sits at the edge of Crown Heights, which is home to one of the city's largest communities of Orthodox Jews.

Associated Press

Taylor Swift is showing just how bad Edinburgh's housing emergency really is

Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour is seeing people who are homeless in Edinburgh pitted against tourists for hotel space in Edinburgh. It’s become the norm and the Scottish government must act, Shelter Scotland’s Alison Watson writes

ALISON WATSON
31 May 2024

Cruel Summer, Taylor Swift. Image: Casey Flanigan/imageSPACE/Shutterstock

A family or individual in Edinburgh who is going through the trauma of homelessness should not be asked to move miles away from their jobs, their schools, or their communities to access emergency accommodation. But that is the sad reality of what’s happening in Scotland’s capital.

Taylor Swift’s Murrayfield concert brought this issue into the headlines, but this concert isn’t the first time we’ve seen the situation emerge. During the Edinburgh Festival, the Six Nations, and over the festive period the same thing happens again and again. Without urgent intervention from the Scottish government, it will keep happening.

The housing system is now so broken that people experiencing homelessness are pitted in direct competition with tourists; that injustice is as obvious as it is shameful. It simply shouldn’t be the case that a city like Edinburgh, a global destination for tourism, can’t host a major event without it having a significant knock-on effect for people experiencing homelessness.

Big Issue is demanding an end to poverty this general election. Will you sign our open letter to party leaders?

To give the City of Edinburgh Council it’s due, they know this is a problem. The city simply doesn’t have the resources required to meet the unprecedented demand placed on its homelessness services. Record numbers are stuck in temporary accommodation, including 3,000 children. The city is chronically over reliant on using tourist accommodation to fulfil its legal obligations to citizens who become homeless.

Edinburgh is among the most acutely affected parts of the country but the situation here isn’t unique; we see a similar picture across Scotland. Local authorities are failing to meet their statutory obligations to homeless people, breaking the law in other words, at an industrial scale. Nearly half the population of Scotland lives in an area which the Scottish Housing Regulator has said doesn’t have a fully functioning homelessness service. They’re over stretched, overwhelmed, and homeless people are paying the price. In that context it’s no surprise that seven separate councils, including Edinburgh, have declared housing emergencies.

The Scottish government has now also declared a housing emergency and promised to bring forward a plan to end it. Ministers need to make good on that promise and the clock is ticking because an emergency situation demands an emergency response.

What’s very clear is that more of the same won’t cut it and words must be backed up with cash. Right now, too many local homeless services simply can’t keep up with demand and so are failing to deliver for those in need of support. We know that councils want to change the situation. Edinburgh Council, for example, published an action plan after declaring a housing emergency but it can’t move forward in a meaningful way without funding.

So, in the first instance the Scottish government needs to step in and give local authorities the resources they need to ensure homeless services can operate effectively.

More homes are also essential. A serious and longstanding shortage of social homes has driven Edinburgh, and Scotland, to this point. Benefits and wages haven’t kept pace with runaway housing costs, so more and more people have found it impossible to keep a roof over their head. But decades of underinvestment in social housing means that when they present to the council as homeless, there simply aren’t the homes for them to go to. So, more and more people get trapped in temporary accommodation for longer periods of time, placing ever greater strain on the local services. Delivering more social homes is the only way to break that cycle.

In the last Budget the Scottish government slashed the funding for social housing prompting widespread, justified, anger and dismay across the country. Now that ministers have declared a housing emergency its vital the delivery of social housing is accelerated and properly funded.

People in Edinburgh, and across Scotland, have been dealing with the brutal reality of the housing emergency for years now. This is the latest example of just how cruel that housing emergency can be for those living at its sharpest edges. Our politicians have acknowledged that reality; they now have a responsibility to back their words up with urgent, meaningful, action. People simply can’t wait any longer.

Alison Watson is the director of Shelter Scotland.
Election 2024: Scotland headed for huge change with SNP set to lose dozens of seats to Labour


Labour leader Keir Starmer with his Scottish Labour counterpart, Anas Sarwar. Alamy/Stefan Rousseau

Published: May 31, 2024 
The Conversation UK.

Scotland, it was claimed by first minister and SNP leader John Swinney, is again being “disrespected” by the Conservatives. This was his response to the news that the UK election would be held on July 4 – after many Scottish schools have already broken up for the summer, and just as a lot of families will be taking off on holiday. To Swinney (and others), this was just another example of Scotland being an afterthought for Westminster.

It may indeed be the case that Scotland was not a major factor in Rishi Sunak’s decision to call a July election. After all, Scotland only returned six Conservative MPs in 2019 (down from 13 in 2017) out of a total of 59. Voters overwhelmingly chose the SNP, which took 45% of the vote and 48 seats, thereby making it the third-largest party in Westminster (again).

This has been a pattern since the Scottish independence referendum of 2014, which triggered a political realignment. Ever since, the Scottish electorate appears to have voted according to constitutional preference, rather than making a wider, issues-based consideration. Those who voted for independence supported the SNP in Westminster elections, while those who opposed it mostly backed Labour or the Conservatives.

But recent polls suggest this pattern is about to be broken. Scotland, it appears, is headed for huge change.

We can help you make informed decisions with our independent journalism.Get newsletter

All indications are that the next parliament will include many more Scottish Labour MPs and many fewer SNP MPs. Indeed, the latest polls indicate the SNP could lose up to 30 seats, with the vast majority going to Scottish Labour, while the Scottish Liberal Democrats and Scottish Conservatives could pick up one or two additional seats, respectively. Boundary changes mean Scotland will now have 57 rather than 59 MPs, but that will be little consolation for the SNP.

Since its 2019 victory, support for the SNP has declined steadily. The political woes of former first minister Nicola Sturgeon and her husband Peter Murrell, followed by her resignation in February 2023, was a rough patch for the party.

Her successor, Humza Yousaf, after a period of initial calm beset by only minor gaffes, had to resign suddenly after pulling out of the SNP’s governing agreement with the Greens. His replacement as first minister and leader, Swinney, has hardly had time to bed in. He may well have preferred that the election was held later in 2024, enabling him to deal with some of the SNP’s woes in the meantime.

However, we should not automatically assume that the drop in support for the SNP means voters in Scotland no longer care about independence. Support for independence remains at about the same level it was in 2014. What appears to have changed is that people appear to now want to vote with other issues in mind.

While a core of support remains for the SNP on the independence issue, the two most important issues for respondents to a recent poll were the cost of living and the NHS. When asked to highlight the most important three influences on their potential vote, two-thirds focused on the cost of living as an issue, and half on the NHS.

In this regard, Scotland seems to be much like the wider UK. Both of these issues rated far ahead of other matters such as independence, climate change, immigration, education or jobs and unemployment – all of which scored in the teens in terms of how likely they were to influence people’s voting choice.
First minister and SNP leader John Swinney had only been in post a few weeks when the election was called. Alamy/SST

As it stands, more people trust Scottish Labour on these core issues than they do the SNP or the Scottish Conservatives. Only on the issue of independence, unsurprisingly, is the SNP stronger than its main competitor. But up to 20% of those who voted SNP in 2019 have indicated they may well support Scottish Labour in July.

Want more election coverage from The Conversation’s academic experts? Over the coming weeks, we’ll bring you informed analysis of developments in the campaign and we’ll fact check the claims being made. Sign up for our new, weekly election newsletter, delivered every Friday throughout the campaign and beyond.

A significant percentage of voters are seemingly happy to shift support when it comes to who they feel will best stand up for Scotland in Westminster. Over the past decade, the SNP has been the recipient of such support, but party in-fighting, legal woes and the rapid turnover of three leaders have clearly had an impact.

Faced with a Conservative UK government, voters in Scotland strongly supported the SNP, seeing the nationalist party as the best choice for a voice for Scotland in the UK parliament. That, it seems, is now a changing perception, and support is clearly moving.

With Labour the strong favourites to form the next UK government, a number of voters in Scotland, more concerned with the issues of day-to-day living rather than constitutional matters, are backing Scottish Labour. This time, these voters may consider that having more Scottish voices within the UK government, rather than in opposition in Westminster, could be a potential positive for Scotland.


Author
Murray Leith
Professor of Political Science, University of the West of Scotland
Disclosure statement
Murray Leith has previously received funding from the European Union and the Scottish Government. He is a member of the Electoral Reform Society.
Partners
Australian researchers find simple, cost-effective desalination method

May 31, 2024 
By Phil Mercer
A man carries plastic jugs of water during a drought in Spain, Jan 31, 2024. Australian researchers say they have found a new way to remove salt from seawater using heat, which could help combat global water shortages.

SYDNEY —

Australian researchers say a simpler and cheaper method to remove salt from seawater using heat could help combat what they call “unprecedented global water shortages." The desalination of seawater is a process where salt and impurities are removed to produce drinking water.

Most of the world’s desalination methods use a process called reverse osmosis. It uses pressure to force seawater through a membrane. The salt is retained on one side, and purified water is passed through on the other.

Researchers at the Australian National University (ANU) say that while widespread, the current processes need large amounts of electricity and other expensive materials that need to be serviced and maintained.

Scientists at ANU say they developed the world’s first thermal desalination method. It is powered not by electricity, but by moderate heat generated directly from sunlight, or waste heat from machines such as air conditioners or other industrial processes.

It uses a phenomenon called thermo diffusion, in which salt moves from hot temperatures to cold. The researchers pumped seawater through a narrow channel, which runs under a unit that was heated to greater than 60 degrees Celsius and over a bottom plate that was cooled to 20 degrees Celsius. Lower-salinity water comes from the water in the top section of the channel, closer to the heat.

After repeated cycles through the channels, the ANU study asserts, the salinity of seawater can be reduced from 30,000 parts per million to less than 500 parts per million.

Juan Felipe Torres, a mechanical and aerospace engineer at the Australian National University and the project’s lead chief investigator, explained his pioneering work.

“We use a phenomenon people have not used before,” he said. “We are exploring its applicability in this context but in essence (it) should be something super simple, something as simple as a channel where you have water flowing through it and you are going to produce some sort of separation, and this is what thermal desalination is doing.”

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has stated that by 2025, 1.8 billion people around the world are likely to face “absolute water scarcity.”

Torres said the ANU’s invention could help ensure water supplies to communities under threat because of climate change.

“Our vision, let’s say, for the future to have a more equitable world in terms of water security and food security is a method that does not require expensive maintenance or to train personnel to continue running it. So, we think thermal desalination would enable that,” he said.

The ANU team is building a multi-channel solar-powered device to desalinate seawater in the Pacific kingdom of Tonga, which is enduring a severe drought.

The research is published in the journal Nature Communications.