Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Thanks Herr Werner

Werner Patels aka Alberta Avenue who suffers from multipleblog personality syndrome, and is poltically schizophrenic ( he supports the Tory's Federally, is a Liberal provincially, hates the NDP with a passion, and is now passionate about the Green Party) took umberage with my column about how Edmonton Strathcona Candidate Linda Duncan NDP challenged the Green party on her website.

She also challenged the Liberals and Conservatives, but Werner is now a born again Greenie, having worn out his welcome with Progressive Bloggers and Blogging Tory's with his rantings.

In doing so he saved me the effort of posting the link to the article on Canadian Conversation, and of course on the Green Bloggers site. Thanks for the publicity Werner.

Werner says;
"I think the Green Party should launch a solid counterattack against that NDP candidate and set her straight."

Well that would certainly be something to see considering that most of the enivronmental movement in Alberta knows Linda as one of Canada's top Environmental legal experts and lobbyists. Yep I would love to see that debate, hey the debates are coming up next week guess we will see what the Greens have to say then.

Werner on the other hand remains strangely silent about the Elections Canada investigation into the Green Party and complants from members that Jim Harris and his Tory buddies have taken over the party in a coup de dat. Strange cause Werner says he is all about transparency and good governance.

Green Party hit with second elections complaint

A second complaint to Elections Canada of alleged electoral-law violations by Green Party officials has been made public by a former party member, even as the party threatens legal action against the initiator of a complaint reported last week.

Elections Canada talking with Greens about possible election-law violations

The discussions are based on a letter of complaint filed by Matthew Pollesel, the party's former assistant national organizer. Pollesel alleges that the former grassroots party has been hijacked to gain access to federal election subsidies provided under the new elections-financing law. Leader Jim Harris is accused of underestimating his expenses for the party leadership in 2003.

But not so strange when you realize that Schizoid Werner is anything but transparent hiding behind his multipleblog personalities.

Also see

Green Party Seal Hunt Flippers




Tags









More on Anders

Wayne Chu had a visit from Rob Anders, Conservative Calgary West and has this to say about the arrogance of Rob. Just another reason to Vote Out Anders.

Tags






Love Me, I'm A Liberal

So Buzz is at it again vying apparently for a Senators Job with the Liberals, no not the hockey team the guys in the Red Chamber.

On a Sunday CBC Talk Show wacky old Buzz attacked the RCMP investigation into the Income Trust Scandal
claiming it was a Tory set up against the Liberals, and that the RCMP were politically motivated.

RCMP should have waited, Hargrove says

Buzz Hargrove said it was not "proper police work" for the RCMP to confirm it was investigating a possible leak of the announcement in the midst of a federal election campaign, and suggested that it gave an unfair advantage to the opposition.

The outspoken union leader made the assertion on CBC Radio's morning program The Current, in which he was on a panel of political "mavericks," along with former Liberal MP Carolyn Parrish and one-time Conservative Deborah Grey.

Mr. Hargrove, who endorsed the Liberals in December, characterized the "supposed leak" as an opportunity for the Conservatives to launch a "nasty campaign" against the reigning Liberals.


Except the RCMP began the investigation based on an NDP complaint.
Guess its cause Jack didn't consult with Buzz over that.

He was so outraged that the Liberals should be challenged on what could be a major case of insider trading, that he let the cat out of the bag HE REALLY IS THE POSTER BOY FOR THE LIBERALS....so no wonder they are using him in their wallpaper poster campaign.

Yesterday, other members of the CBC panel responded with incredulity to Mr. Hargrove's statement. Ms. Parrish called Mr. Hargrove a "former idol of mine. He's obviously deserted the NDP and gone very Liberal on us," she said.
So I thought of Phil Ochs when I read about Buzz, and this came to mind......

Love Me, Love Me, Love Me, I'm A Liberal ....Phil Ochs

Once I was young and impulsive
I wore every conceivable pin
Even went to the socialist meetings
Learned all the old union hymns
But I've grown older and wiser
And that's why I'm turning you in
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal


A tip o the blog to Dissonance And Disrespect for this

Tags










PM to Eliminate PM Immigration Tax

In a stunning announcement yesterday Paul Martin PM announced that he will eliminate the decades old head tax on new Immigrants imposed in 1995 by Paul Martin, Finance Minister.

"For many Canadian families with immediate relatives overseas, one of the challenges that they have faced is the $975 right of permanent residence fee," he said.

Immigrant Canadians were heard to ask; what took him so long?

Don't worry they were assured it will only take three years more to get rid of this unfair tax burden on them and their families. Cause change can't happen overnight.

The landing fee will be phased out over the next three years. The fee will drop immediately to $600, then to $300 after 12 months, and finally to zero within the next two budgets.


Wait a minute it didn't take three years to impose this new 'head tax' why is it taking three years to eliminate it?

The government had claimed the fee was imposed to cover costs associated with processing applications. Yet opponents criticized the fee, saying it was a money grab.


Wait a minute, how come they didn't get rid of it during the last twelve years in power?

Tags





PR will lead to Fascism

Proportional Representation will lead to fascism says the Editorial in yesterday's Brandon Sun. Now this has got to be the lowest of the low in defense of the status quo.

In response to Jack
Layton and the NDP's call for electoral reform the Sun says the reason we don't need PR is cause our system allows party's to become more centerist while PR allows for radical fringe parties to get elected. Now we wouldn't want that. With no mention of the fact the Green Party says the same thing, oh right they are a radical fringe party according to the Sun Editorial.

While that seems more democratic, it would be anything but. What it would do is give small fringe parties supported by only tiny pockets of Canadians all the power to decide whether governments live or die. And what that would mean is that instead of encouraging parties to be mainstream, moderate and offer universal appeal to Canadians, it would instead reward radical ideas and crazy policies that are simply unpalatable to most Canadians.

Like in Quebec where the Liberals and Coservatives would actually gain seats under PR which they won't under the current system. But the BS over looks that.

They follow up that comment with this;

Look what’s happened in other countries that have had PR. In 1999, Austria’s moderate centre-right party formed a coalition with the ultra right-wing Freedom Party, a populist fringe group whose leader, Joerg Haider, described the policies of Adolf Hitler as “exemplary.” Since then, the right-wing coalition that rules Denmark has also had to appease the far right in order to keep power and as a result has had to adopt restrictive — some might say racist — anti-immigration policies.

The papers initials BS certainly applies to this editorial.


Tags








Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Linda Does it Again

I am impressed while folks took time off during the holidays the campaigners and webfolks at Linda Duncan's NDP website for Edmonton Strathcona came up with this nifty little side bar for her campaign page. It's Linda's answer to Strategic Voting.


I like her comments on the Greens in particular, for their right of centre economics and political sheninagens after Harris and the Red Tory's took over. And as an Environmentalist her record for getting effective legislation passed is excellent.

Liberals, Liberals? Oh, are they running here? I thought they were only focusing on Edmonton Centre and Landslide Anne McLellan.


Tags








CBC Hypocrisy

So CBC refused to run the bio on Tommy Douglas and Health Care during the election cause it might 'influence' how people vote.

Well perhaps they could explain running this tonight on CBC Newsworld, especially when the Chinese Head Tax is in the news again.


Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 10:00 p.m.

10:00 p.m. Rough Cuts
In the Shadow of Gold Mountain - Chinese-Canadian community campaigns to win government redress for relatives forced to pay the notorious Head Tax.

Maybe its cause its on late, or maybe its just cause its run already and this is repeat, or may be cause no one watches Newsworld. Yeah that's it.

Tags









Chavez is NOT an Anti-Semite

John Murney is upset that Hugo Chavez apparently made an Anti-Semitic remark in his Christmas Speech to the homeless in Venezuela.

As hard as I could try, I could only find right wing Anti-Chavez references to the supposed Anti-Semitic remarks that Hugo Chavez, President Elect of Venezuela was said to have made in his Christmas Speech about Christ the Socialist/ Christ the Rebel.

The source referred to on Johns Blog was a biased or very least self interested Zionist Canadian web site called Judeoscope which made the assertion that Chavez said this (highlighted part). However the actual quote is;

"...that is why I say that today more than ever and in 2005 years we need Jesus the Christ, because the world, the world, the daily world is ending, each day, the wealth of the world, because God, nature is wise, the world has sufficient water for all of us to have water, the world has sufficient wealth, sufficient land to produce food for all of the world population, the world has enough rocks and minerals for all of the constructions, so that nobody would be without a home. The world is for all of us, then, but it so happens that a minority, the descendents of the same ones that crucified Christ, the descendents of the same ones that kicked Bolivar out of here and also crucified him in their own way over there in Santa Marta, in Colombia. A minority has taken possession all of the wealth of the world, a minority has taken ownership of all of the gold of the planet, of the silver, of the minerals, the waters, the good lands, oil, of the wealth then and have concentrated the wealth in a few hands: less than 10% of the population of the world owns more than half of the wealth of the world and ...more than the population of the planet is poor and each day there are more poor people in the whole world. We are decided, decided to change history and each day we are accompanied and will be accompanied by more Chiefs of state..."


Now the edited version of this speech was originally posted on John’s blog by one of the little rightwhingnutbars that attacks John regularly; goes by the pen name of Tommy Douglas, funny right. Anyways in a posted comment on an unrelated topic TD says Chavez made anti-Semitic remarks and links to Judeoscope.

Isn't it neat when the very rightwhingnutbars that have historically been linked to anti-Semitism use this as an attack on the left. Of course they are deliberately confusing Anti-Zionism with Anti-Semitism in most cases.

I respect John, I like his blog, and as a result of the attack on him by TD he has moderated his comments section. Good. But he also took this story at face value, and gave credence to the Judeoscope story by publishing this on his blog.

Now as a longtime boradcast journalist I would expect better of him in this regard. And I would have thought he would do some research on this quote and those who are supposedly the source of this news story.

What I have found is that it is a story circulating around on Anti-Chavez sites which should immediately give us all pause and question the sources and the context of what they are purporting what Chavez said or meant.

And the comment is open to interpretation. Their spurious attempts to link Chavez with Iran, rather than with the recent election of Evo Morales in Bolivia in his Christmas remarks makes this all the more suspect as a propaganda campaign from the right. As Bill Weinberg writes;

Ironically, an account of his speech in FrontPageMag, FreeRepublic and the conservative Hispanic Center for Economic Research (HACER) ("A Perilous Hanukkah with Hugo—Venezuela's socialist strongman demonizes the Jews," Dec. 28) indicates that he likely meant the spiritual descendants of the christ-killers, i.e. the capitalists, not the Jews:

Celebrating on December 24, Chavez said ‘Christmas is a rebellious, revolutionary, socialist Christ [sic] …the descendants of those who crucified Christ have taken ownership of the riches of the world, and they have concentrated it in a small number of hands.” Chavez said he was “decided” to change history, and he said that every day, he is joined by a “greater quantity of Chiefs of State and leaders in that struggle.” Among those are Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with whom Chavez recently met. On December 14, Ahmadinejad described the Holocaust as "a myth," months after he suggested that Israel should be "wiped off the map."

It is also likely that the other chief of state Chavez had foremost in mind was Bolivia's newly-elected Evo Morales, not the buffoonish Ahmadinejad (who HACER, of course, prominently features in a photo with the Venezuelan leader). We also question the accuracy of both JTA's and FrontPageMag's translations, as they don't quite match and the latter seems awkward at best.



I also found this article on Chavez and his supposed Anti-Semitism, equating the Chavez revolution in Venezuela with National Socialism in Germany (its that old canard of the right; Hitler wasn't one of us he was a 'socialist'). It was published in the Weekly Standard, the voice of all that is Right in the Republican Party in the USA, last summer.


Under Chavez, more than one million Venezuelans have voted with their feet in the largest political exodus in Latin America since the Cuban migrations of the 1960s. Venezuela's Jewish community has been halved over the past six years. Many of the children and grandchildren of those who arrived on the Koenigstein and Caribia have now left the country. Fortunately, there are no exit restrictions--yet.


It has been combined in the news stories above with the supposed Christmas remarks to inflame readers to believe there is a pogrom against Venezuelan Jews. As Tim Bartholomew at Salon Blogs notes:

This comes several weeks after a raid on the Colegio Hebraica, a private Jewish school in Caracas. The reason given for this was purported Mossad involvement in the assassination of State Prosecutor Danilo Anderson.

Gee the Weekly Standard Story ran August 8th while Chavez made his remarks on December 24 that is longer than a ‘couple of weeks’. But when there is little real evidence of a pogrom or an Anti-Semitic campaign in Venezuela fabrication of evidence by spurious linking is all these guys have.

It is clearly a propaganda campaign, one that began with the Weekly Standard story this summer and continued into the fall.

The Grand Rabbi of Sao Paulo, the American Henri Sobel, told President George W. Bush on Sunday in Brasilia about the ”precarious” situation of the Jews in Venezuela, accusing Hugo Chávez of being an ”anti-Semite”.

Speaking over the phone with AFP, the president of the rabbinate of the Congregation of Jews in the Brasilian metropole said that ”even though there is no discrimination in Venezuela officially, Hugo Chávez does everything he can to spread hatred against the minorities”.

"Chávez is a demagogue, a radical, an anti-Semite in a country where there is a lot of social injustice”, said Mr. Sobel, reporting what he had said to the American President George W. Bush, during a private meeting, in which the president of the Jewish Congress, Israel Singer, also participated.

”Under these circumstances it is tempting to look for a scapegoat”, emphasized Rabbi Sobel, adding that ”the masses have a tendency to listen to false messiahs”.

”This mixture of political unrest and social turbulence creates an environment conducive to anti-Semitism and that is why the situation is precarious”, not only for the Jews, but for all the minorities in Venezuela.

While the Rabbi of Brazil was speaking on behalf of the Jews of Venezuela this is what they had to say for themselves.

Jews Dismiss Charges of Anti-Semitism in Venezuela
El Universal
November 9, 2005

In Venezuela there is no anti-Semitism, and nor have there been any attacks on the Jewish community by the State, said David Bachenheimer, Secretary General of the Confederation of Jewish Associations of Venezuela (CAIV).

Henri Sobel, leader of a Jewish congregation in Sao Paulo, declared that the Venezuelan Jewish community was living in a precarious situation due to anti-Semitic positions taken by the government of president Hugo Chavez during a meeting last week with U.S. president George W. Bush.

Bachenheimer explained that the CAIV was surprised by Rabbi Sobel’s statement as he had never asked the Venezuelan Jewish community whether or not it had been victimized or persecuted.

Bachenheimer went on to say that in Venezuela there have been no problems of anti-Semitic or racist attacks and the government has always acted quickly when isolated incidents of racial or religious intolerance occur. He added that the Jewish community has never been the target of policies or campaigns against it.


Now did Chavez really mean Jews when he spoke out at Christmas? What did the Jews have to do with the killing of Bolivar asks Normblog.

Good question. Could Chavez not only be referring to the rich and the capitalists (the 10% who own all the wealth) but also be referring to the Romans, who actually crucified the historical Jesus, and the later Roman Catholic Church which having resumed power in Spain under the Carlists continued to fight against the National Liberation struggle of Bolivar?

Hmmm its pretty open ended that. And I know its a semantic argument at best but before launching into a tirade accusing of Chavez of Anti-Semitism, that is largely a deliberate and calculated smear of the rightwhingnutbars who equate him with National Socialism, this has as much validity as saying he was speaking of Jews.

And hey after all Venezuela is a Catholic country and the Church under the last pope was virulently anti-liberation theology and pro-right wing. And after Pat Robertson called for Chavez's assisnation, the Venezuelan government can be forgiven for being cautious about the intentions of Born Again Evangelical Protestants too.

..Florida-based New Tribes Mission today is appealing its ordered expulsion from Venezuelan tribal areas to that nation's Supreme Court. New Tribes spokeswoman Nita Zelenak is asking people to pray that Venezuela's high court will take the case and suspend the order, or at least let the missionaries continue their Bible translation and evangelism while the case is considered. President Hugo Chavez announced the expulsion nearly two months ago, accusing New Tribes missionaries of spying for the CIA, a charge they vigorously deny. Zelenak says New Tribes missionaries are rushing to complete as much work as possible in the few weeks left before their mandatory departure. [AP]


But these attacks on Chavez and his apparent Anti-Semitism, that is equating his Bolivarian revolution, a peaceful nationalist democratic electoral process, with National Socialism have been around since he was first elected and the CIA attempted to oust him with a coup.

They are spurious at best, even the Jewish Human Rights monitoring organization the Stephen Roth Institute says that Venezuela has been a rather benign country when it comes to overt Anti-Semitism, even more so than Canada! However let us be clear that what the Institute and other Zionist organizations call Anti-Semitism is not only overt attacks on Jews but ANY criticism of Israel and Zionism;

In the pro-government newspaper Vea, Guillermo Garcia Ponce, an ideologue of the Chavez Bolivarian Revolution, wrote several pro-Palestinian articles which included classical antisemitic statements

Back in 2001 this excellent article, from a Libertarian Perspective, said this about Chavez and his revolution.

The Republican policy wonks who believe that Chavez is a Fidelista retread, a mad leftist who would spread socialist subversion throughout the region and revive the Third International ignore the essentially rightist thrust of his politics. The New York Times, in its "new" reporting, has all but accused Chavez of being a fascist sympathetic to anti-Semitism, a latinized version of Austria's Haider.

Steve Ellner, author of three books on Venezuelan politics and history, and a professor of economic history at the Universidad de Oriente in Venezuela since 1977, puts it this way:

"Chávez embraces a homegrown style of nationalism underpinned by Venezuelan heroes. His discourse resembles Sandinismo which also developed a national doctrine while breaking with imported models of Marxism-Leninism. Chávez berates historians for practically writing off the nation´s history between the death of Simón Bolívar in 1830 and the modern era, dismissing a whole century of political leaders as ¨caudillos," or strong-men. In a book of interviews with Chávez entitled The Commander Speaks, he states: ¨Caudillos may have been necessary for the incorporation of our people in historical struggles. I believe we have been sold an imported bourgeois democratic model – that of the elimination of our leaders."

But let’s leave the last word to Larry Derfner ,columnist in the Jerusalem Post, who as the comments to his column show, was roundly berated for his critical comments on Jews and his positive comments of Chavez and the revolution of the poor now occurring in Latin America.

As an American-born Jew who grew up in an East European immigrant, Left-liberal household, I'm very happy to say that democratic socialism has become the rising tide in South America.

It's basically a peasants' revolt, only peaceful, electoral. The poor people want to take back the ownership of their countries' natural resources from the foreign corporations. They also want New Deal-type economic policies, not the tight-fisted, bank-capitalist approach demanded by their creditors at the International Monetary Fund, which only made them poorer.

This week Bolivians voted Evo Morales into power, joining the leftward trend that's spread through Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Uruguay and Peru. The movement's leader is Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, who is loathed by the Bush administration and even wishfully marked for death by evangelist Pat Robertson, but who keeps winning elections because he spends his country's oil profits to help the poor.

There was a time, up to about 30 years ago, when I would have been part of a worldwide Jewish rooting section for the South American socialist upheaval. What's more, the assumption would have been that South American Jews were heavily involved in the movement, and Jews all over would have been worried for their safety at the hands of the continent's old, wealthy, fascistic elite.

But world Jewry has changed, in Israel and everywhere else. Today its voice is the voice of wealth and power. The strongest Jewish reaction to what's happening in South America - to the extent that influential Jews know what's happening there - is alarm. Fear. Fear that this poor people's movement could spread to other parts of the world, and endanger the wealth and power of all the Jews whose attitude toward the poor is more or less the same as the Bush administration's.

I know - 70% of American Jews vote Democrat. But they don't offer much dissent anymore on the subject of poverty. When Jews were struggling immigrants in America, their economics was socialism. For their children and grandchildren, it was liberalism. Today, for the immigrants' great-grandchildren, it's conservative, businessman's capitalism.

Tags










Tax Breaks Hurt the Bond Market

Ok fianciers, Tory tax cutters, speculative investors, would be capitalists, here is what happens when you cut and cut and cut taxes for corporations. And no there is no trickle down effect. But there is an effect on the Bond Market and the price of the dollar.

Why are yields so low?


One puzzle that perplexed Wall Street through 2005 was the question of why long-term bond yields remained low even as the U.S. Federal Reserve Board kept raising short-term interest rates.

U.S. corporations tend to be awash in cash. With companies generating so much free cash flow, they don't need to borrow as much as usual. What will happen in 2006 if that free cash flow begins to deteriorate because companies have been spending less in recent years on expanding their businesses.

But with corporations hoarding capital (cash) and not investing it, opps I thought tax breaks meant they would invest back into their companies, and not borrowing, if the consumer financed U.S. growth bubble bursts that could spell
R E C E S S I O N.




Tags











The Dan Report: Conservative Tax Cut a Canadian Value?

The Dan Report: Conservative Tax Cut a Canadian Value?

Telus Strike Redux

So after not having a collective agreement for five years, forcing workers into striking for months and then giving them no guarntee of not contracting out their jobs, what does the President of Telus say for himself? Oh yeah and how much did he pay himself last year?

Darren Entwistle President and CEO Telus Corp. Age: 43
''We are focused on being one team, united behind one strategy and defined by one brand.'' Compensation in 2004: $6.54-million
Punk.

Tags




Mr. Dithers Returns

No Comment, this says it all.
Bank merger issue joins the federal election fray
Prime Minister Paul Martin says the next federal government will have to deal with the thorny question of bank mergers, although he wouldn't clarify his own position on the issue.

Tags






The Glass is Half Full

The Globe and Mail, which is closely aligned with the Liberal Election Machine, is 'gleefully' reporting that a new poll shows that NDP supporters will shift votes to the Liberals to avoid a Conservative election victory.

But is it really true? Chuck the editorializing from this article and here is what you get. Just the facts m'am as Joe Friday would say.

The latest Decima Research online survey of 6,380 voters, released Sunday, suggests that half of those surveyed would like to see more New Democrats in the House of Commons. But when asked if they'd like to see more New Democrats elected, even if it means the Conservatives ultimately win power, support fell to 35 per cent.

Ok so half these folks will vote for the NDP and if the Liberals appear to be losing, then only then 15% of them 'may' abandon the NDP for the Liberals. That sounds like a gain for the NDP to me. They retain more than they lose. And if they begin to kick butt as Jack did today attacking strategic voting and the Liberals, well thats 15% to gain back. Seems to me like the glass is still half full not half empty.

What the Globe and Mail didn't say about the poll was this:

Nationwide, the poll found 52 per cent of respondents considered the prospect of a Liberal majority undesirable, while 25 per cent found it desirable and 23 per cent found it acceptable.

The results were almost identical for a Tory majority: 56 per cent found that prospect undesirable, 25 per cent desirable and 19 per cent acceptable.

A minority government, led by either party, was acceptable to more people.

Interestingly, the New Democratic Party scored very similar results to the two main contenders, even though the NDP is running a distant third in most opinion polls.

An NDP majority was considered undesirable to 56 per cent, acceptable to 26 per cent and desirable to 18 per cent.
An NDP minority was deemed acceptable to 44 per cent, undesirable to 44 per cent and desirable to 12 per cent.


The poll also asked respondents whether a Conservative government would make matters better or worse in 15 different public policy areas. In every case a healthy majority _ ranging from 62 per cent to 85 per cent -- said
the Tories would be better or no different than the Liberals.

Gee do I detect a Liberal bias at the Globe and Mail. Awww say it ain't so......

Tags







Liberal Pension Blues

A tip o the blog to I (AM)Canadian Too for this item on how PM screwed his workers out of their pensions and what Federal workers have to look forward to.

Tags






Why Is Buzz Clapping


So Mr. Labour, Buzz Hargrove who says he called for strategic voting cause he is well Left Wing, more Left Wing than the NDP, has ended up as a poster boy for Canada's CEO Paul Martin and his Liberal Election Team.

By endorsing a Liberal minority with an NDP balance of power, the CAW is not “drifting” toward Liberal views. Indeed, my opinions (on everything from free trade to public ownership to gun control) clearly place me to the left of the NDP hierarchy. Buzz Hargrove


Nope you are not drifting as the picture shows, you are embracing the Liberals.

Ah Buzz can you explain why you are supporting the Liberals who did this?


Liberals and Conservatives defeat anti-scab legislation

"NDP will continue to fight for working Canadians,": Layton


OTTAWA - NDP Leader Jack Layton expressed deep frustration when a vote on a private member's bill (C-263), to amend the Canada Labour Code to prevent the use of replacement workers, was defeated by Liberals and Conservatives.

"It is shameful that 72 Liberals joined forces with the Conservatives to block this legislation which would have made a real difference in the lives of working Canadians," said Layton. "Striking workers under federal jurisdiction deserve to know that their jobs are protected when they exercise their legal right to strike. They deserve to be protected from the destructive and hostile practice of strike-breaking."

Gee Buzz any of those Liberals get your vote? Or the vote of your CAW members? By the way Buzz counting on your fingers that's over half of the Liberal Government MP's that voted against CLC sponsored labour legislation. Legislation you supported.

Trade Union Principles be damned eh Buzz as long as you save a few Auto jobs in the Southern Ontario Rust Belt.

"Voting Liberal isn't being smart - it's being played," Mr. Layton said in an Ottawa address that kicked off the final three weeks of campaigning before the Jan. 23 ballot

Yep, you tell him Jack.

Buzz thinks of himself as a 'player', but he is being played by the Liberals.

Tags








Monday, January 02, 2006

Strategic Voting In Edmonton Strathcona

The postings on the CBC Riding Talk forum for Edmonton Strathcona shows overwhemling support for strategic voting against Jaffer. And it is in favour of one candidate; Linda Duncan of the NDP. Most of those comments are coming from self confessed Liberal voters and even a few Red Torys.

Now of course this is completely unscientific. But it does show what I have been saying all along this is a two way race between the NDP and the Conservatives. With that kind of a race we have to remember that provincially the seat is held by the NDP. Last time the vote splitting between the Liberals and NDP allowed Jaffer to come up the middle.

With no credible candidate this time for the Liberals, the choice is clear to folks that Linda Duncan is the big tent candidate for all opposition voters. And from the comments, the Jaffer Must Go crowd is lining up behind Linda.

This election is about Change, and in Edmonton Strathcona that means Jaffer must go, he has been ineffectual and unproductive for the riding. With voters wanting change, traditional resentment towards the Liberals and displeasure with Jaffer's politcal carrerism in the Reform/Alliance/Conservative party and lack of concern for Edmonton Strathcona, puts the NDP in the sweet spot for this election. They are a vote for change.

Will Edmonton Strathcona vote for change? That is the question. As I have said before this is a race to watch on January 23.

Tags







Boulevards Don't Vote

It's a phrase one of my pals an NDP campaign organizer uses alot. We would argue about it. Boulevard signs catch a drivers or bus pasangers eye but they say nothing about support for the candidate. So essentially he is right.

Get them signs out in front of houses. That shows real tangible support and influences the neighbours. A sign in front of a house shows a vote. Count em and weep with joy or humility.


Now in areas of Edmonton Strathcona including where I live, I see NDP Candidate Linda Duncan signs popping up all over the place. Including in front of houses that have NEVER had a sign before and some that have had other party signs in front of them in the past. A tour through parts of the riding** see her signs outnumbering incumbent Jaffer's signs.

She has few Boulevard signs yet. While her competitor the incumbent Conservative Rahim Jaffer has lots and lots of big old boulevard signs. And signs on buildings. Like Boulevards, Buildings don't vote. And they show what one would expect from the Landlord class, that they vote Conservative.

Well not all Landlords, some of them vote Liberal. The first Liberal candidate signs I saw were today, in front of walk up apartment buildings. Every campaign the Liberals and the Conservatives battle it out for the Landlord vote. But house signs are where its really at, and Linda and the NDP are doing the job to pull the vote. It will be an interesting night come January 23.

In Edmonton Mill Woods Beaumont, the same thing again, a three way boulevard fight between the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP. But again fence signs which are popular in this riding show a great wave of support for the Liberal candidate Grewal. Lots of houses have large fences and berm fences, so big signs work in Millwoods. And lots of houses have Liberal signs more so than either the Conservatives or NDP.

Conservative Mike Lake has taken to having boulevard signs all over the main roads, including some on the grounds of a local church that was the centre of an Anti-Gay Marriage Rally here last spring.

Of course like Edmonton Strathcona the ethnic fix is in. Both Grewal and Jaffer can count on Indo-Canadian sign and financial support, but whether they can count on their votes is another question. In both cases those votes may make the difference in this election. Again another nailbiter in this riding on the night of January 23.


** this is a purely anectodal assessment and does not reflect any empirical data about the various party's signage.


Tags







Stephen Levesque? Rene Harper?

While blog discussions have been full of debates on Alberta Seperatism in the wake of Gordon Stamps firing, it makes sense that fueled as the Conservatives are with Western Alienation and indignation, that the Harper should do what Lougheed and Klein have done for years, encourage Quebec seperatism when in Quebec and bash Quebec 'special' interests when in Alberta.

Here is a perfect example of what Conservative federalism really means.

Coming into Quebec, getting some French press, and speaking, as Mr. Harper does, about how he is the heir to Rene Levesque when it comes to cleaning up government and election finance laws gives the Conservatives the kind of legitimacy in this province they lacked during Stockwell Day's leadership.


Gee wasn't that Rene Levesque guy head of the PQ? Notice he doesn't compare himself to Brian Mulroney another Quebecer.

And the Conservative answer to Liberal Federalism is of course Asymetrical Federalism;

Harper made the following promises:

  • To end the "fiscal imbalance" between Ottawa and Quebec,
  • To allow Quebec to play a role in international institutions like UNESCO when its cultural responsibilities are at issue, and
  • To practice "open federalism" that recognizes provincial autonomy plus "the special cultural and institutional responsibilities of the Quebec government."
Can you say Firewall Quebec?



Tags





Ecology=Equality

In a 2002 study on ancient arctic peoples it was found that the harsh environmental condtions created a form of necassary social equality between men and women that may not have occured in a more hospitable environment.

The differences that are observed across the whole of the data file on the isotope composition of paleo-population from Ekven are related rather to cultural tradition than to sex and age. This characteristic requires further consideration. In the ancient and ethnographically known communities the gender dietary specializations are quite common. The uniformity of the isotopic composition of the skeletal tissue of men and women of all ages in the paleo-population from Ekven can be considered as significant weakening of cultural traditions serving as the expression of social roles of both genders.
From the modern point of view this fact can be considered as the manifestation of the social equality of men and women. On the other hand, the dietary monotony and uniformity dictated by severe ecological conditions a priori deprived this population of the cultural means to express their ideal notions in the dietary codes. In this way the tough rules of survival imposed by ecology limited the applicability of some forms of cultural self-expression.

Kozlovskaya Maria V.. The Dietary System of the Ancient Arctic Population: Cultural and Biological Adaptation.



Tags








Dialectical Anthropology-A.P. Alexeev

Anthropology and Sociology are sciences that resonate with Historical Materialism and Dialectics. They were in their infancy when Marx and Engels embraced them and promoted them. Hence Historical Materialism is sometimes seen as an amalgam of history, politics, economics, sociology and anthropology. One could add geography and urban studies as well, but you get my drift. It is a particular philosophic viewpoint that is often mistakenly called Marxist interpretations of science. In fact Historical Materialism arises from the scientific viewpoint, expanding on Kant and Hegel, Fichte and Comte, and their materialist viewpoints and their histographical view of the philosophies of science.

In North America we suffer from a disinct lack of contact with both Contiental European authors and scientists as well as those from the Slavic speaking countries. Part of the problem of course is that their is a uniligual as well as scientific monothiesm or isolationaism that dominates North America. It's American exceptionalism. If it ain't American it ain't worth sh*t.

Of course during the Cold War (1948-1989) any scientific work done by Soviet researchers, or even those who came from Eastern Europe, was suspect. The anti-communism (anti-Stalinism of the liberal left) of the American Military Industrial Complex and its right wing lobbyists (the John Birch society) would have nothing to do with academics from Russia. And of course American academics on the liberal left, (Daniel Bell comes to mind) quickly denounced Historical Materialism and Dialectics, as well as Marxism in their rush to bury and banish revolutionary thought and thinkers from Americas universities.

Last summer I was in Vancouver and visited the Peoples Co-op Bookstore, once the outpost of the Communist Party of Canada, now a left non sectarian bookstore, operated by the CPC still. There I found a book entitled The Origin of the Human Race by A.P. Alexeev puiblished twenty years ago. It was one of the last books published by the English Language publishing house of the USSR, Progress Books before the Stalinist regime dissolved into a withering mass of contradictions market capitalism.

Alexeev was no mere acamedician, he was a high ranking member of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, which of course is no more. And he was their leading archaeologist and anthropologist specializing in primitive man and his socio-cultural evolution. And he was not a party member. He was very much a free thinker, as much as one could be under that particualr authoritarian structure.

In Origins of the Human Race he challenges his readers and the scientific community with his theories.


Homo rudolfensis is a fossil hominin species originally proposed in 1986 by V. P. Alexeev for the specimen Skull 1470 (KNM ER 1470)[1] . Originally thought to be a member of the species Homo habilis, much debate surrounded the fossil and its species assignment. Skull 1470 is an estimated age of 1.9 million years. It was found by Bernard Ngeneo, a member of a team led by anthropoligist Richard Leakey, in 1972 at Koobi Fora on the east side of Lake Rudolf (now Lake Turkana).
Homo habilis / Homo rudolfensis
Though many paleoanthropologists classify Homo habilis ("handy man") as a Homo sapiens ancestor, the exact bridge from one species to another has been debated since the Leakeys found the first specimen (OH 7) in 1960.
Homo habilis is thought to be the first hominid to use simple tools. Its brain size is bigger than that of the australopithecenes. Experts can't even agree on exactly which specimens should be definitely considered Homo habilis.
Adding to the confusion over Homo habilis, some specimens have sufficient differences that another species has been proposed. V.P. Alexeev, using thee KNM-ER 1470 as a type specimen, suggested the species Homo rudolfensis in 1986. Homo rudolfensis may have been the ancestor to the Homo habilis. Perhaps they were two separate species. Some even believe it should be classified as an australopithecene.

H. habilis

Early Hominds Text

As stated, the attribution of the species rudolfensis to any specimen is somewheat controversial, since many paleoanthropologists do not see rudolfensis as a valid species. Its dating (whether the early dates proposed by some or the contemporaneous dates to habilis) makes its brain size an issue, and raises questions about current standard phylogeny of the human line. Homo rudolfensis may be the first member of the genus Homo on a path to modern humans, or it may be a more Homo-like australopithecine with no direct bearing on the evolution of H. sapiens. Nothing can be stated for sure at this point, except that there will be much more future debate on the issue.

Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology
Homo rudolfensis (Alexeev, 1986) sensu Wood,
1992
In a presentation of the fossil evidence for human
evolution, published in English in 1986, the Russian
anthropologist Valery Alexeev (1986) suggested that
the differences between the cranium KNM-ER 1470
and the fossils from Olduvai Gorge allocated to Homo
habilis justified referring the former to a new species,
Pithecanthropus rudolfensis, within a genus others had
long ago sunk into Homo (see H. erectus section
below). Some workers have claimed that Alexeev
either violated, or ignored, the rules laid down within
The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
(Kennedy, 1999). However, there are no grounds for
concluding that Alexeev’s proposal did not comply
with the rules of the Code, even if he did not follow all
of its recommendations (Wood, 1999a). Thus, if
Homo habilis sensu lato does subsume more variability
than is consistent with it being a single species, and if
KNM-ER 1470 is judged to belong to a different
species group than the type specimen of Homo habilis
sensu stricto, then Homo rudolfensis (Alexeev, 1986)
would be available as the name of a second early
Homo taxon.
This does seem to be the case, for several in-
dependent studies have shown that the degree of
variation within Homo habilis sensu lato is greater
than that which would be expected in a single species
(Lieberman et al. 1988; Wood, 1991; Rightmire,
1993; Kramer et al. 1995; Grine et al. 1996). Several
researchers have recommended that the material be
split into 2 species.


The Hominid Transitonal Timeline



In 1991 Alexeev was invited to speak at Harvard it would be his first and last
trip to the United States. He died that year as the Soviet Union finally collapsed and becamse the Russian confederation.

His renarkable set of lectures at Harvard have been transcribed and put online by
Geraldine Reinhart-Waller.

Valery Pavlovich Alexeev came to Harvard University in Summer, 1991 to teach two anthropology courses: "Peoples and Cultures of the Soviet Union" and "Archaeology of the USSR". The subject matter for this volume, "A Brief Cultural History of Eurasia as told by Professor Alexeev to his student Geraldine Reinhardt", is based on these lectures; however, much of the information has been updated to reflect the current geography of Eurasia rather than preserving the once Soviet Union.

Alexeev was considered one of the Soviet Union's most distinguished anthropologists. He directed the Institute of Archaeology in Moscow and was able to achieve full membership in the Soviet Academy of Sciences without ever having been a member of the Communist Party. He studied both ancient and contemporary cultures throughout the USSR; his studies also took him to Mongolia, Syria, India, Vietnam, and Cuba. As a staunch supporter of international collaboration way before the emergence of "perestroika", Alexeev participated in joint Soviet-American conferences on the Siberia/Alaska connection and was a paramount figure in establishing a role for Soviet scholars in Earthwatch sponsored field programs. It was Alexeev's wish to establish a world-class natural history and anthropological museum in Moscow.


Myth*inglinks' Eurasia / Eurasia/Central Asia Portal Page

Alexeev being a paleoanthropolgist specializing in Eurasian Peoples and cultures from prehistory to the early modern period is of course bound to conflict with scientists from the West whose speciality is not this geographic area. Such was his contention over the Kenyan skull find. Of course during the cold war such science was dismissed often out of hand by those in West in the pay of a Cold War Academia.

He contributed to the UNESCO History of Humanity Volume 1
Prehistory and the beginnings of civilization


Another contentious issue that Alexeev contributed to was the Asiatic origins of the ancient Sythian peoples.

“Scythian Triad” and “Scythian World”

In order to recognize
the Asian origin of the Scythians as recorded in Herodotus it
was necessary to find archaeological sites in the steppes that
belonged to the Cimmerians, the precursors of the Scythians.
The discussion has intensified concerning the connection be-
tween concrete archaeological cultures and disparate archaeo-
logical sites belonging to the Cimmerians who were mentioned
in written sources. Many scholars believe in the existence of a
specific Cimmerian ethnos. Only pre-Scythian sites, and sites
located in the Black Sea area, have been identified with the
Cimmerians (Terenozhkin 1976; Alexeev et al 1993). Euro-
pean archaeologists had divided opinions concerning the iden-
tification of the Cimmerians with the diverse pre-Scythian an-
tiquities. Discussion again surged concerning the chronologi-
cal and typological connections between the cultures, and their
place within other Late Bronze Age cultural formations. The
discussion is far from over, and currently these experts have
come full circle.

Finally he argued that Neanderthal's were were more prevelant than currently is accepted by Western scientists. He also posits that they traveled widely and in more open areas and thus had a developmental influence on humans and continued into existance in Ice Age Eurasia. His thesis was that Eurasia was vastly more populated with indigineous peoples than scientists up till then had been willing to accept.

A year after Alexeev's death another Russian Paleoanthropogist shook the academy with his announcement of finding ancient prehistoci peoples in Siberia.

Siberian Site Defies Theories on Peopling Pebble Tools Are Dated to 3 Million Years

by Don Alan Hall

A vast archaeological site in Siberia is challenging anthropologists to reconsider theories of human evolution and dispersal. Because of his discoveries over the past 10 years at the Diring site on the Lena River, Yuri A. Mochanov, a prominent Russian archaeologist, has concluded that hominids lived in the far north in the Earliest Paleolithic, possibly as long as 3 million years ago.

Perhaps, he dares suggest, humans might not have originated in Africa.

Mochanov presented his findings at the 45th Annual Northwest Anthropological Conference in April at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia. Mochanov, a member of the faculty of the Academy of Science at Yakutsk, Siberia, was making his first appearance at a scientific meeting in North America. His presentation obviously perplexed American and Canadian anthropologists and archaeologists. Siberia is not supposed to be a place to look for stone tools more than maybe 35,000 years old— certainly not more than a million years old.







Tags












The Incredible Shrinking Man

Humans are the ultimate domesticated animal. And as such we have reduced our brain capacity while enlarging our learning capabilities. Interesting contradiction that. And as we domesticated ourselves we did it through the process of domestication of other species, from agricultural grains to animals.

While we domesticated a variety of animals, dogs, horses, oxen, cows, etc. we reduced our reliance on our own faculties that were replaced by the domesticated animal. In effect the dialectical relationship was not so much one of dominance, as we are now finding out, but of wait for it....mutual aid.

As we planted and transplanted wild grains and developed more domesticated strains, we also settled down into a more domesticate routine, we could no longer be nomadic hunter gatherers.

And as a result our ability to free ourselves from essentially survival tasks allowed us to develop culture, regardless of the reduction in our brain capacity.

Dr Groves believes early humans came to rely on dogs' keen ability to hear, smell and see - allowing certain areas of the human brain to shrink in size relative to other areas.

"Dogs acted as humans' alarm systems, trackers and hunting aids, garbage disposal facilities, hot-water bottles and children's guardians and playmates. Humans provided dogs with food and security. This symbiotic relationship was stable over 100,000 years and intensified in the Holocene [Period] into mutual domestication," said Dr Groves. "Humans domesticated dogs and dogs domesticated humans."

In a keynote address to the Australasian Society for Human Biology in December, Dr Groves repeated an assertion made by others as early as 1914 - that humans have some of the same physical characteristics as domesticated animals, the most notable being decreased brain size.

The horse experienced a 16 per cent reduction in brain size after domestication while pigs' brains shrank by as much as 34 per cent. The estimated brain-size reduction in domesticated dogs varies from 30 per cent to 10 per cent.

Only in the last decade have archaeologists uncovered enough fossil evidence to establish that cranial capacity in Homo sapiens declined in Europe and Africa by at least 10 per cent beginning in the Holocene Period, about 10,000 years ago.

Dr Groves believes this reduction may have taken place as the relationship between humans and dogs intensified and the animals allowed for the diminishing of certain human brain functions like smell and hearing.

BBC - Origin of Dogs Traced

Dogs today come in all shapes and sizes, but scientists believe they evolved from just a handful of wolves tamed by humans living in or near China less than 15,000 years ago.


It looks as if 95% of current dogs come from just three original founding females

Matthew Binns, Animal Health Trust
Three research teams have attempted to solve some long-standing puzzles in the evolution and social history of dogs.

Their findings, reported in the journal Science, point to the existence of probably three founding females - the so-called "Eves" of the dog world.

They conclude that intensive breeding by humans over the last 500 years - not different genetic origins - is responsible for the dramatic differences in appearance among modern dogs


Peter Savolainen, of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, led the study of Old World dogs, analysing DNA samples taken from dogs in Asia, Europe, Africa and arctic America.

'Bit of a surprise'

His team found that, though most dogs shared a common gene pool, genetic diversity was highest in East Asia, suggesting that dogs have been domesticated there the longest.

Researcher Brian Hare said the dogs outperformed even the chimpanzees, and the puppies were as good as the older dogs, proving the skill was innate and not learned.

"During domestication there was some kind of change in their cognitive ability that allowed them to figure out what other individuals wanted using social cues. The biggest surprise was the puppies - even as young as nine weeks old, they're better than an adult chimpanzee at finding food."

He said the research might ultimately provide some clues as to how social skills evolved in humans.




Tags