Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Australia fires: The farmers burying their own cattle

Belinda Attree walks towards a ditch in a paddock that has been blackened by Australia's massive bushfires.
"We'll get as close as we can without probably getting a bit sick," she says.
In the ditch - now a grave - are 20 dead cattle and a kangaroo. All were badly burned when the fire swept through Corryong, about half-way between Melbourne and Sydney.
Warning: Some may find the following pictures of dead animals distressing
Belinda, her husband Travis, and their children made a terrifying last-minute escape as the fire swung around unexpectedly and roared through their property.
But when they returned after the fire-front had passed, they found 11 dead cows, and others that were too injured to keep.
"It destroys you, mate, to shoot your own cattle," Travis says. "I take pride in my cattle, to have them in good condition. And to do this, it's just not right."


Dead cattle in a ditch on the Attree's property
Image captionAgriculture Minister Bridget McKenzie estimates 100,000 cattle and sheep will be lost in this season's fires

Travis Attree has put down cows before. It's an unpleasant reality of farming. But he has never faced anything like this.
He tears up a bit. They've lost lots of other things too: all their hay, the hay shed, another shed full of football memorabilia, two boats, and an all-terrain vehicle.
But losing animals hurts the most. When asked why he hasn't covered the animals' grave, the answer is simple.
"My neighbour hasn't found all of his," he says. "There could be more to go in there yet."
Belinda recorded a video as they returned to the property. In it, she tearfully follows their injured herd through the choking haze, knowing they won't have any choice but to euthanise many of the stock.
"They must have just been in so much pain," she says. "And that's what's hard. What's really really hard."
Much of their property is an ashen moonscape. There's nothing for their remaining livestock to eat.
They have rolls of hay on their front lawn, all of them donated. But they've already sent 30 of their animals to the abattoir, and more might go.


Travis assessing the damage on his farm
Image captionTravis assessing the damage on his farm

Marilyn and Neil Clydsdale are cattle breeders who have 400 breeding stock across their properties near Corryong. They've lost at least 30, including three out of four bulls they raised from birth.
"During the firestorm, one of them ended up on our back porch, absolutely frizzled," Marilyn says,
Neil has only just arrived back at his farm with a truck loaded with round bales. He picks one up with a tractor, and with his grandson and his cattle dog Ned, heads out past dead, bloated cattle laid out in a line.
The tractor ambles up the hill, and stops next to the livestock that survived. Neil walks around and unhooks the bale, which unravels down the hill, and the grateful cattle tuck in.
But he still has to figure out what to do with them.
"We either have to engage in a very heavy feeding regime, sell off the livestock, or locate the livestock somewhere else," he says.
He's a collector of antique farm machinery, and it's this social network that has generated an unexpected lifeline.
A collector friend found them a property owner who wants an overgrown paddock eaten out. They'll pay to truck their remaining livestock down there, but otherwise it's free. It's a tremendous stroke of luck.
But the day isn't done with Neil yet. As he feeds his cows, he notices the large back tire on his tractor is hanging off the rim of the wheel.
It's flat and it's irretrievable. He had a spare in a shed in town. But that burned down and it wasn't insured. It's another A$1,500 (£800; $1,030) expense on a list that just keeps growing.
It's demoralising. An insult on top of injury. Neil looks a little glum, but there's no time to think about it. There's too much work to be done.


Neil in front of the broken tractorImage copyrightNEIL CLYDSDALE

Rob Miller is a dairy farmer on the south coast of New South Wales with about 1,200 acres. He's been hit twice by bushfire over the past few months, and they have burnt out about two-thirds of his land.
"I've never had two fires hit me ever in my life before," he says.
Dairy Farmers Australia, an industry body, says around 70 dairy farms have been hit in this year's fires, including 20-25 each in New South Wales and Victoria, and maybe 12 in South Australia.
Rob thinks he has lost up to 20% of his stock. He's still figuring it out. In some places the stock may have wandered onto a neighbour's property.
Some of his dairy cows were kept cool under sprinklers. But for many others, the heat and the stress have just been too much. Cows that are calving have been affected too.
"We've had four or five abort in the last 48 hours," he says.


A scorched tree stands on its own in farmland burnt by fires
Image captionThe bushfires have razed both inland and coastal regions across Australia this summer

He'll need to bring in 25 tons of feed a day to feed them all. At the moment, with all the road closures, that's impossible.
The cows have been on ration feeding. He'll have to get rid of many more. He'll export some of his lower quality stock to Japan when he's able.
There will be huge decisions over the coming week about what to do with his stock. He's filled with a sense of dread about the rest of the season.
"I'm on an edge. I know if I take my finger off the pulse, something terrible could happen," he says.
If there's one thing everyone agrees on, it's that there's a desperate need for rain, both to put out the massive fires and to rehabilitate the farms.
Last year was Australia's hottest and driest on record. The tinder dry conditions fuelled the fires. And the recovery is also likely to stretch water resources, because re-growing forests will suck up huge amounts of water.
"Our catchment is diabolically impacted by this," says Helen Haines, the independent MP for Indi, which takes in Corryong, as well as the headwaters of the Murray, Australia's largest river system.
And while cattle farmers have been hit hard, they're certainly not the only agricultural or primary industry that's been affected.
Already, Ms Haines says, wine growers, pine plantations and hop growers have all been hit. She expects the impact will be huge, and it will be national.
After all, the fires stretch from Victoria all the way up to Queensland, and there's almost two months left in the fire season.





Media captionThe race to save animal casualties injured in Australia's bushfires

Neil Clydsdale is 70. He has worked at the same property since 1984. He thinks many other local farmers will simply give up and do something else. Personally, he's thinking of retiring.
"In terms of financial and emotional stress on people, I think this is going to take a number of years for the community to recover," he says. "It's horrendous."
But not everyone feels the same way. The Attrees are hopeful that with a little luck and a little rain, they'll be restocking by May. Besides, they don't know what they'd do otherwise.
"There's no other choice for us," says Belinda. "We would never choose to leave. This is us."
The Coffin Club: People meeting to make their own coffins 
Meet The Coffin Club of Rotorua - New Zealanders who get together every week to make their own coffins. It's an idea that's spread around the world, with coffin clubs springing up across the UK, the US and other countries beyond. 
 Video produced by Ellen Tsang and Mauricio Olmedo-Perez.





James Murdoch's attack on News Corp and Fox News has not been discussed by board, director says


Peter Barnes says board has not talked about Rupert Murdoch’s son’s attack on Fox News and News Corp’s climate coverage


Ben Butler and Anne Davies

Wed 15 Jan 2020

 
James and Kathryn Murdoch said they were frustrated by coverage of the climate crisis by Fox News and News Corp. Photograph: Neil Hall/Reuters


The lead independent director of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, Peter Barnes, says the media group’s board has yet to discuss James Murdoch’s attack on the company over its stance on the climate crisis.

On Wednesday James Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch’s son and a News Corp director, issued a joint statement with his wife, Kathryn Murdoch, in which the couple said they were frustrated by coverage of the climate crisis by Fox News and News Corp.

“They are particularly disappointed with the ongoing denial among the news outlets in Australia given obvious evidence to the contrary,” a spokesperson for the couple said.

The Australian says it accepts climate science, so why does it give a platform to 'outright falsehoods'?

Read more

James Murdoch’s intervention – a rare attack by a company director on his own group’s operations – added fuel to an already raging debate in Australia over News Corp’s coverage of global heating and the deadly bushfires that have devastated the country’s eastern seaboard.

Shareholder activists said the move added to the pressure on News Corp over the climate emergency and could lead to investor attacks on management at the company’s annual meeting later this year.


It also appears to reignite a succession battle between James Murdoch and his brother, Lachlan, that seemed resolved in 2018 when Lachlan was given important executive positions within the family empire as part of a restructure of the group.

News Corp itself battened down the hatches on Wednesday, with management in Sydney and New York declining to comment on the Murdoch scion’s comments.

The atmosphere inside the company’s Australian headquarters on Holt Street in Sydney was guarded on Wednesday as staff grappled with the unexpected attack, News Corp sources said.

However, Barnes, a former executive with tobacco company Philip Morris who now serves as the lead independent director on News Corp’s board, told the Guardian he was aware of media reports of James Murdoch’s statement.

As lead director, Barnes has an important role on the News Corp board that includes acting as a conduit between News Corp and investors, helping to set the pay of executives and acting as chair of the audit committee.

Speaking on Wednesday afternoon, Australian time, he said he had no comment on James Murdoch’s statement.

“What I’ve read in the papers is breaking news and we don’t meet again until the middle of February,” he said. “As you would no doubt know, this board has quite a lot of international people.”

In addition to James Murdoch, his brother, Lachlan Murdoch, and father, Rupert Murdoch, who is executive chairman, News Corp’s board includes the former president of Spain, José María Aznar, Ana Paula Pessoa, who is a director of Brazilian artificial intelligence company Kunumi, and former US senator Kelly Ayotte.

“I understand from the papers that James has made a statement but I have no comment to make because I haven’t made contact with them [the other directors],” Barnes said.

Brynn O’Brien, who heads the the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said the shareholder activist group currently held no shares in News Corp.

“The pressure’s mounting on them on climate change, so let’s see,” she said. “It’s a very unusual situation where you have a board member on the record, through a spokesperson, attacking the governance and operations of the company.”

Shareholder activist Stephen Mayne, a former News Corp journalist who has repeatedly attacked the company over issues including a two-class share structure that cements the control of the Murdoch family, said an “obvious next step” would be to put up a resolution on climate change at the next AGM, which is likely to be held in October or November.

“I certainly think there’s a big opportunity for the full symphony of shareholder resolutions and engagement,” he said.

Spokesmen for News Corp in Sydney and New York declined to comment on James Murdoch’s comments.

The Sydney representative said the company stood by comments made by News Corp Australia chairman, Michael Miller, on Friday in response to a leaked email to him in which an employee accused News Corp papers, including the Australian, the Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun, of spreading misinformation by focusing on arson as the cause of the bushfires, rather than climate change.

Miller said News Corp “does not deny climate change or the gravity of its threat”.

“Our coverage has recognised that Australia is having a serious conversation about climate change and how to respond to it,” he said. “However, it has also reflected there are a variety of views and opinions about the current fire crisis. The role of arsonists and policies that may have contributed to the spread of fire are, therefore, legitimate stories to report in the public interest.”

Even this week Telegraph columnists were still blogging about the “woke greenies” who were responsible for the fires and “the distorted debate.”

In his Monday Daily Telegraph blog, Tim Blair quoted Breitbart columnist James Delingpole: “Where this Australian bushfire tragedy is concerned, no one deserves more opprobrium than the greens whose poisonous, anti-human, anti-science, anti-history ideology has turned what could have been a minor inconvenience into a full-on disaster.”

He went on to link to Delingpole’s column, whose central thesis was that the fires had nothing to do with climate change.

“The dry, hot conditions which have exacerbated these fires are weather, not climate,” he writes. “Australia, a hot, dry country, has been here many, many times before.”


James Murdoch criticises father's news outlets for climate crisis denial

On Wednesday, columnist Miranda Devine stridently counselled Scott Morrison to resist a royal commission into the bushfires, arguing that “global forces are using Australia’s fires as propaganda to drum up support for their climate agenda”.

Measured by loss of life, Devine argues the 2009 Victorian fires were a far bigger tragedy. Victoria had a royal commission into those fires.

“Even if you accept the proposition that humans can dial down the earth’s temperature by not using fossil fuels or eating meat, Australia creates a puny 1.3% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions,” she argued. “Morrison could capitulate to the carbonistas, and close down Australia, but it won’t stop the bushfires.

“Blaming climate change is a cynical diversion from the criminal negligence of governments which have tried to buy green votes by locking up vast tracts of land as national parks yet failed to spend the money to control ground fuel and maintain fire trails.”

A 2013 study of News Corp’s coverage of climate change found almost half its comment pieces expressed doubt about climate science. It has continued to publish climate deniers whose columns have been comprehensively debunked by scientists.

Trump administration shares no blame for downing of Flight PS752, says top Republican

'There's no doubt where the blame lies' - House minority leader Kevin McCarthy


House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., arrives for a briefing on last week's targeted killing of Iran's senior military commander Gen. Qassem Soleimani on Capitol Hill, in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2020, (Jose Luis Magana/The Associated Press)

"The president made the right decision," House minority leader Kevin McCarthy told reporters today in Washington, D.C.
"There is no blame here for America. America stood up once again for freedom. Iran went past a red line they had not gone past before, killing a U.S. citizen. Iran shot down an innocent, commercial airliner. There's no doubt where the blame lies."


In an interview with Global National's Dawna Friesen on Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau indirectly blamed rising tensions in the Middle East for the destruction last week of Flight PS752 just after takeoff outside Tehran.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends a candlelight vigil in Ottawa for victims of the Ukraine International Airlines crash in Tehran on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2020. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
Iranian leaders admitted Saturday that Iran's Revolutionary Guard shot down the Boeing 737-800 using surface-to-air missiles. Of the 176 people on board, 57 were Canadians.
"I think if there were no tensions, if there was no escalation recently in the region, those Canadians would be right now home with their families," Trudeau said.
"This is something that happens when you have conflict and ... war. Innocents bear the brunt of it. And it is a reminder why all of us need to work so hard on de-escalation, on moving forward to reduce tensions and find a pathway that doesn't involve further conflict and killing."
Iran and the U.S. lurched to the brink of open war when a U.S. drone strike killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani Jan. 3 in Baghdad.
International observers and Trump's domestic critics argue the sudden decision to kill another country's military leader destabilized the security climate in the region — making miscalculations like the one that apparently led to the downing of Flight PS752 more likely.



A rescue worker shows pictures of a girl recovered from the plane crash site in Shahedshahr, southwest of the capital Tehran, Iran, Jan. 8, 2020. (Ebrahim Noroozi/The Associated Press)
Asked whether the administration of U.S. President Donald should have warned Canada of the plan to kill Soleimani, McCarthy ducked the question by citing Iranian acts of aggression in the region, including an Iranian-backed assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad in late December and a rocket attack on an Iraqi military base that killed an American civilian contractor.
"I think Soleimani should've been killed," he said. "I think if he had been held accountable for his actions for decades before ... the American would be alive. And Trudeau did not have to mention Iran because the facts are purely on Iran ... Trudeau is right about what Iran had been doing."
Bruce Heyman, who served as U.S. ambassador to Canada under President Barack Obama, tweeted today that Trudeau was correct to state that "escalation" made the crash more likely.
Heyman told CBC News that the Trump administration "owed Canada advance notice of this action."
"[With] any ally, your relationship is based on trust ... you rely on your ally to communicate with you, to collaborate with you, to work as a team," he said. "This fog of war was created as a result of the escalating tension that was a direct result of the targeting of Qassem Soleimani."
A senior Canadian government official, speaking on background today, cautioned against anyone interpreting Trudeau's comments as the prime minister blaming Trump for the crash. The official said the PM's message since the crash has been a consistent call for de-escalation by all the involved parties.
"That's not a single finger pointed at any one [president]," the senior official said.
Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican congressman from Nebraska, told CBC News that while U.S. officials "should have tried" to warn Canada in advance of the strike against Soleimani, he blamed the operation's "short-notice time frame" for the lack of a heads-up.
"Our heart goes out to our Canadian friends because we know how heartbreaking that is," he said. "I don't think putting the responsibility on President Trump was correct. The real responsibility was Iran. Iran shot down that airliner.
"The Russians are the ones who are selling Iran high-end surface-to-air missile equipment that they do not know how to operate ... So you can put some of this on Russia ..."
Rep. William Keating, a Democrat representing Massachusetts, said the U.S. should be "working with our allies" in the region, including Canada.
"Well, the Iranians are responsible for that shootdown of the plane. They're responsible, that's the reality of it," he said. "But do we want more tragedies?
"My heart breaks for those families that lost their lives in that terrible, terrible incident."
In his conversation with Global News, Trudeau was asked to react to a tweet from Maple Leaf Foods CEO Michael McCain blaming the "narcissist in Washington" for creating the anxious climate that led to the destruction of Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752.
"I've heard many Canadians express a range of, of conclusions, of emotions, outrage, grief, loss," Trudeau said. "And it doesn't surprise me to see a range of conclusions and messages coming from all Canadians ..."
And while the PM acknowledged there isn't "a lot of trust" in the Canada-Iran relationship, the regime's admission of fault "shows there is a willingness to move forward and take responsibility."
The unnamed Trudeau government official said Trudeau has been treading carefully in public since this crisis began. Even after reports began to circulate suggesting Iranian involvement in the crash, the PM suggested that the missiles may have been fired in error — a move calculated to give Tehran room to "get to the truth" without having to be "dragged to the truth," said the official.
Outgoing Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer today called on the Trudeau government to "immediately" list Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization. The unnamed government official said doing so now might interfere with efforts to investigate the crash and secure the return of Canadian victims' remains.
With files from David Cochrane

How the sewing machine accidentally liberated women

An advert for Singer's Patent Sewing Machine, 1899
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Gillette adverts stand against toxic masculinity. Budweiser makes specially-decorated cups to encourage non-binary and gender-fluid people to feel pride in their identity.
These examples of so-called "woke capitalism"- of corporations promoting progressive social causes - may feel ostentatiously up-to-the-moment. But woke capitalism is not as new as you might think.
Back in 1850, social progress certainly had further to go.
A couple of years earlier, American campaigner Elizabeth Cady Stanton had caused controversy at a women's rights convention by calling for women to be given the vote. Even her supporters worried that it was too ambitious.
Black and yellow badge, with a portrait of Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and text reading "Equal Rights for Women, Harlem Equal Rights League", 1900Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Meanwhile, in Boston, a failed actor was trying to make his fortune as an inventor.
He had rented space in a workshop showroom, hoping to sell his machine for carving wooden type. But wooden type was falling out of fashion. The device was ingenious, but nobody wanted to buy one.
The workshop owner invited the demoralised inventor to take a look at another product which was also struggling: a sewing machine. It did not work very well. Nobody had succeeded in making one that did, despite many attempts for many decades.
The opportunity was clear. True, the time of a seamstress was not expensive - as the New York Herald said: "We know of no class of workwomen who are more poorly paid for their work or who suffer more privation and hardship." But sewing took so much time - 14 hours for a single shirt - that there would be a fortune in speeding it up.
And it was not only seamstresses who suffered: most wives and daughters were expected to sew. This "never-ending, ever-beginning" task, in the words of contemporary writer Sarah Hale, made their lives "nothing but a dull round of everlasting toil".
In that Boston workshop, the inventor sized up the machine he had been asked to admire, and quipped: "You want to do away with the only thing that keeps women quiet."
Presentational grey line
Programme image for 50 Things That Made the Modern Economy
50 Things That Made the Modern Economy highlights the inventions, ideas and innovations that helped create the economic world.
Presentational grey line
That failed-actor-turned-inventor was Isaac Merritt Singer. He was flamboyant, charismatic, capable of great generosity - but ruthless, too.
He was an incorrigible womaniser who fathered at least 22 children.
Isaac Merrit SingerImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
For years he managed to run three families, not all of whom were aware the others existed, and all while technically still married to someone else entirely. At least one woman complained that he beat her.
Singer was, in short, not a natural supporter of women's rights - although his behaviour might have rallied some women to the cause.
His biographer, Ruth Brandon, dryly remarks that he was "the kind of man who adds a certain backbone of solidity to the feminist movement".
Singer contemplated the prototype sewing machine.
"In place of the shuttle going round in a circle," he told the workshop owner, "I would have it move to and fro in a straight line, and in place of the needle bar pushing a curved needle horizontally, I would have a straight needle moving up and down."
Singer patented his tweaks, and started to sell his version of the machine. It was impressive: the first design that really worked. You could make a shirt in just an hour.
Isaac Merrit Singer's first sewing machine, patented in 1851Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionThe first Singer sewing machine was patented in 1851
Unfortunately, it also relied on various other innovations which had already been patented by other inventors - such as the grooved, eye-pointed needle, to make a lock stitch, and the mechanism for feeding the cloth.
During the so-called "sewing machine war" of the 1850s, rival manufacturers seemed to be more interested in suing each other for patent infringement than selling sewing machines.
Finally, a lawyer banged their heads together, pointing out that between them were four lots of people who owned patents to all the elements needed to make a good machine. Why not license each other, and work together to sue everyone else?
Presentational grey line

More things that made the modern economy:

Presentational grey line
Freed from legal distractions, the sewing machine market took off - and Singer came to dominate it. That might have surprised anyone who had seen how his factories compared with those of his rivals.
Others had rushed to embrace what was known as the "American system" of manufacturing, using bespoke tools and interchangeable parts. Yet Singer was late to this party: for years his machines were made from hand-filed parts and store-bought nuts and bolts.
But Singer and his canny business partner, Edward Clark, were pioneers in another way: marketing.
Sewing machines were expensive, costing several months' income for the average family.
Clark came up with the idea of hire purchase: families could rent the machine for a few dollars a month - and, when their rental payments totalled the purchase price, they would own it.
An advertisement for Singer Sewing Machines from 1900Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
It helped overcome the bad reputation built up by the slower, less reliable machines of bygone years. So did Singer's army of agents, who would set up the machine when you bought it, and call back to check it was working.
Still, all these marketing efforts faced a problem. And that problem was misogyny.
For a flavour of the attitudes Stanton was up against, consider two cartoons. One shows a man asking why you would buy a "sewing machine" when you could simply marry one.
In another, a salesman says women will get more time to "improve their intellects!" The absurdity was understood.
A Punch cartoon mocking the benefits of sewing machinesImage copyrightPUNCH CARTOON LIBRARY / TOPFOTO
Such prejudice fuelled doubts that women could operate these expensive machines.
Singer's business depended on showing that they could, no matter how little respect he might have shown for the women in his own life.
He rented a shop window on Broadway in New York, and employed young women to demonstrate his machines - they drew quite a crowd.
Singer's adverts cast women as decision-makers: "Sold only by the maker directly to the women of the family." They implied that women should aspire to financial independence: "Any good female operator can earn with them $1,000 a year!"
By 1860, the New York Times was gushing: no other invention had brought "so great a relief for our mothers and daughters". Seamstresses had found "better remuneration and lighter toil".
A seamstress using a Singer sewing machine in 1907Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionA seamstress using a Singer sewing machine in 1907
Still, the Times rather undercut its gender-conscious credentials by attributing all this to the "inventive genius of man".
Perhaps we should ask a woman. Here's Sarah Hale, from Godey's Lady's Book and Magazine in 1860: "The needlewoman is… able to rest at night, and have time through the day for family occupations and enjoyments. Is this not a great gain for the world?"
There are plenty of sceptics about "woke capitalism" today. It is all just a ruse to sell more beer and razors, isn't it? Perhaps it is. Singer liked to say he cared only for the dimes.
But he is also proof that that social progress can be advanced by the most self-interested of motives.
The author writes the Financial Times's Undercover Economist column.

BABY IT'S COLD OUTSIDE

EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CANADA
 -32C WIND CHILL FEELS LIKE -47C