Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Biden should channel Reagan, 
ask Putin about UFOs at summit

Marik von Rennenkampff, Opinion Contributor 

In a little-known historical twist, a lighthearted comment about UFOs and alien invasions helped bring the Cold War to a peaceful end
.
© Getty Images Biden should channel Reagan, ask Putin about UFOs at summit

Winter, 1985. Tensions are high between the United States and the Soviet Union. President Ronald Reagan and new Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev agree to hold their first summit in Geneva, Switzerland.

As a series of lengthy meetings grinds on, Reagan and Gorbachev slip out for a private walk. Reagan, an avid science fiction fan, spontaneously asks the Soviet leader, "What would you do if the United States were suddenly attacked by someone from outer space? Would you help us?"

"No doubt about it," Gorbachev responds, to which Reagan says, "We too."

"So that's interesting," Gorbachev remarks as the two leaders share a chuckle.

After decades of mistrust, such lighthearted exchanges build confidence between the two leaders, upon which Reagan and Gorbachev develop a deep and enduring friendship.

Ultimately, the rapport that the two leaders build in Geneva alters the course of history.

In the years after the summit, Reagan softens his harsh rhetoric towards the Soviet Union. Reduced hostilities help Gorbachev ignore the Kremlin hardliners demanding larger Soviet military budgets to match Reagan's defense buildup. More importantly, the détente gives Gorbachev the political latitude to enact the economic and political reforms that usher in a peaceful end to the Cold War.

Thirty-six years after Reagan and Gorbachev's first summit meeting, a new American president is set to meet his Russian counterpart. The setting, once again, is Geneva. As in 1985, tensions between the two nuclear-armed powers run high.

The odds of a Reagan-Gorbachev-style breakthrough are slim. For one, Russian President Vladimir Putin is not the pragmatic leader that Gorbachev was. President Biden, for his part, has sent stern pre-summit messages to Putin. Moreover, a litany of thorny issues is on the agenda.

But Gorbachev and Reagan showed that bitter adversaries can set aside hostile rhetoric and mistrust to cooperate on critical global security matters.

While the threat of nuclear war loomed large in 1985, the Biden-Putin summit comes as the U.S. government grapples with a perplexing national security issue.

Intelligence analysts and scientists appear genuinely stumped by more than 100 encounters with mysterious objects, many flying in restricted airspace. According to a former top intelligence official, some of the unidentified craft move in ways that "we don't have the technology for."

The U.S. government has reportedly ruled out the possibility that the objects are highly classified American aircraft. Moreover, at least one former top official believes that ultra-advanced Russian or Chinese spy planes are not plausible explanations for the more perplexing incidents observed by the military.





















Analysts and NASA scientists also appear to doubt that mundane factors are behind many of the encounters. According to reports, several objects were observed by multiple sensors - such as satellite, radar, infrared and optical platforms - making balloons, distant jetliners or equipment malfunctions unlikely explanations for some of the phenomena.

To be sure, a highly anticipated report on these incidents appears to have found no evidence that aliens are visiting earth. But the fact that the U.S. government, with its near-unlimited investigatory capabilities, is considering "non-human technology" as a plausible explanation for some of the incidents is a remarkable development.

Recent comments by former presidents Obama and Clinton heightened speculation that the government is entertaining extraordinary theories about these phenomena. When asked about the encounters, Obama and Clinton openly speculated about extraterrestrial life. Similarly, Obama's CIA director mused about "different form[s] of life" when discussing the incidents.

Make no mistake: Former presidents and CIA directors - who continue to receive top-level intelligence briefings - do not suddenly speculate about aliens on a whim. Indeed, one can safely assume that Clinton and Obama asked their intelligence briefers some probing questions about what is known about UFOs before speaking publicly about otherworldly life.

Moreover, according to President Trump's former director of national intelligence, such encounters are occurring "all over the world."

Following revelations that China is "overwhelmed" by similar sightings, this phenomenon appears to have global implications. To that end, Biden must raise the issue with Putin.

Amid what promises to be a tense summit in Geneva, a lighthearted, Reagan-style question or comment about UFOs from Biden may yield a surprising response from the Russian leader. It might even alter the course of history.

Marik von Rennenkampff served as an analyst with the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, as well as an Obama administration appointee at the U.S. Department of Defense. Follow him on Twitter @MvonRen.

  • Joe Biden knows about the existence of aliens and UFOs ...

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1442009/joe-biden-aliens-ufo...

    2021-05-28 · President Biden was recently asked by the press whether he knows about the existence of UFOs. While the current White House incumbent did not reveal the rumours to be true, he also did not deny them.

    • Author: Sean Martin




    • Joe Biden Has Hilarious Response To Fox News Question ...

      https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-biden-fox-news-ufo-question_n_60a...

      2021-05-22 · Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy attempted to ask Joe Biden about UFOs, and the president’s response might best be termed a “Uniformly Funny Observation.”. Doocy’s question came up because of recent …

      • Author: David Moye




    • As UFO buzz enthralls D.C., believers and skeptics agree: The truth is out there

      Stephen Bassett
      Alex Seitz-Wald
      Sun, June 13, 2021

      WASHINGTON — Stephen Bassett and Mick West don’t agree on much. Bassett has devoted much of his adult life to proving UFOs are helmed by aliens, and West has devoted much of his to proving they are not.

      But they both agree on one thing: It’s good that, after nearly 75 years of taboo and ridicule going back to Roswell, New Mexico, serious people are finally talking seriously about the unidentified flying objects people see in the skies.

      “If you look at the level of public interest, then I think it becomes important to actually look into these things,” said West, a former video game programmer turned UFO debunker. “Right now, there is a lot of suspicion that the government is hiding evidence of UFOs, which is quite understandable because there's this wall of secrecy. It leads to suspicion and distrust of the government, which, as we’ve seen, can be quite dangerous.”

      Later this month, the Pentagon is expected to deliver a report to Congress from a task force it established last year to collect information about what officials now call "unexplained aerial phenomena," or UAPs, from across the government after pilots came forward with captivating videos that appear to show objects moving in ways that defy known laws of physics.

      While those who dabble in the unknowns of outer space are hoping for alien evidence, many others in government hope the report will settle whether the objects might be spy operations from neighbors on Earth, like the Chinese or Russians.

      The highly anticipated report is expected to settle little, finding no evidence of extraterrestrial activity while not ruling it out either, according to officials, but it will jumpstart a long-suppressed conversation and open new possibilities for research and discovery and perhaps defense contracts.

      “If you step back and look at the larger context of how we've learned stuff about the larger nature of reality, some of it does come from studying things that might seem ridiculous or unbelievable,” Caleb Scharf, an astronomer who runs the Astrobiology Center at Columbia University.

      Suddenly, senators and scientists, the Pentagon and presidents, former CIA directors and NASA officials, Wall Street executives and Silicon Valley investors are starting to talk openly about an issue that would previously be discussed only in whispers, if at all.

      “What is true, and I'm actually being serious here, is that there is footage and records of objects in the skies that we don't know exactly what they are," former President Barack Obama told late-night TV host James Corden.

      The omertà has been broken thanks to a new generation of more professional activists with more compelling evidence, a few key allies in government and the lack of compelling national security justification for maintaining the official silence, which has failed to tamp down interest in UFOs.

      In a deeply polarized country where conspiracy theories have ripped apart American politics, belief in a UFO coverup seems relatively quaint and apolitical.
      'Truth embargo'

      Interest in UFOs waxes and wanes in American culture, but millions have questions and about one-third of Americans think we have been visited by alien spacecraft, according to Gallup.

      But those questions have been met with silence or laughter from authorities and the academy, leaving a vacuum that has been filled by conspiracy theorists, hoaxsters and amateur investigators.

      West, the skeptic, thinks the recent videos that kicked off the latest UFO craze, including three published by the New York Times and CBS’ “60 Minutes,” can be explained by optical camera effects. But he would like to see the U.S. government thoroughly investigate and explain UFOs.

      The government has examined UFOs in the past but often in secret or narrow ways, and the current Pentagon task force is thought to be relatively limited in its mission and resources.


      In a new, leaked video, an unidentified object flies around a Navy ship off the coast of San Diego. (U.S. Navy via Jeremy Corbell)

      West pointed to models from other countries like Argentina, where an official government agency investigates sightings and publishes its findings, the overwhelming majority of which are traced to unusual weather, human objects like planes or optical effects.

      “This is something that we could do here,” West said. “But right now we're left with people like me, who are just enthusiasts.”

      John Podesta, a Democratic poobah who has held top jobs in several White Houses, has called on President Joe Biden’s White House to establish a new dedicated office in the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, which would help get the issue out of the shadows of the military and intelligence community.

      Podesta, who has harbored an interest in UFOs since at least his days as Bill Clinton’s chief of staff, recently told Politico, “It was kind of career-ending to basically talk about this subject. That has clearly switched, and that's a good thing.”

      Believers are unsurprisingly thrilled by the culture shift.


      “The ‘truth embargo’ is coming to an end now,” said Bassett, the executive director of Paradigm Research Group and the only registered lobbyist in Washington dedicated to UFO disclosure. “I am elated to finally see this movement achieving its moment.”

      Bassett is convinced the government is covering up proof of extraterrestrial life and that everything happening now is elaborate political theater to make that information public in the least disruptive way possible — a view, of course, not supported by evidence or most experts.

      “This is the most profound event in human history that's about to be taking place,” he said.

      But you don’t have to be a believer to believe that poorly understood things should be investigated, not ignored.

      "We don't know if it's extraterrestrial. We don't know if it's an enemy. We don't know if it's an optical phenomenon," said new NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, a former astronaut and Florida senator, in a recent CNN interview. “And so the bottom line is, we want to know."

      Two former CIA directors — John Brennan, who served under Obama, and James Woolsey, who served under Clinton — recently said in separate podcast interviews that they’ve seen evidence of aerial phenomena they can’t explain. John Ratcliffe, who was the director of national intelligence under then-President Donald Trump, told Fox News in March there were “a lot more sightings than have been made public.”
      Cold War and fish farts

      Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, pushed the government to conduct the UFO report. For him, it’s a question of national security and understanding whether rivals like China or Russia have developed advanced technology we don’t know about.

      “I want us to take it seriously and have a process to take it seriously,” Rubio told “60 Minutes.”

      For others, like Ravi Kopparapu, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, and Jacob Haqq-Misra, a research scientist with the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, it’s about discovery.

      "For too long, the scientific study of unidentified flying objects and aerial phenomena — UFOs and UAPs, in the shorthand — has been taboo," they wrote in a Washington Post op-ed. "If we want to understand what UAP are, then we need to engage the mainstream scientific community in a concerted effort to study them."

      Scharf looks for life on other planets and is a bit tired of people asking him if alien life has visited us on ours, but he said looking more at the skies could yield information about how our own world works.

      A mysterious object hovers over a Navy ship in night vision video. (U.S. Navy via @JeremyCorbell)

      “Stuff like this has a scientific interest not because we're necessarily thinking we're going to find aliens, but maybe there's an unknown phenomenon or a collection of phenomena that are giving rise to some of these sightings,” he said. “There's never been a systematic effort to categorize and catalog stuff that people see, and from the past, we know that some of this stuff sometimes turns out to be interesting.”

      The history of science is filled with accidental discoveries and incidents where the hubris of religious or scientific authorities dismissed something as ridiculous that later proved true. Scientists didn’t believe meteorites really came from space until the early 1800s, for instance.

      Government secrecy can lead to confusion and misunderstanding that might be cleared up with the help of a wider circle of experts and investigators.

      Sweden spent years futilely chasing what it thought were Russian submarines off its coast. But when the navy let civilian researchers listen to a recording of the alleged submarine, they figured out it was actually the sound of schools of fish farting.

      Important people have had an interest in UFOs for a long time; they just didn’t really talk about it.

      Former President Jimmy Carter claimed to have seen a UFO while he was governor of Georgia and even filed two formal reports of his observations. Former President Ronald Reagan allegedly told people he saw one too while riding in a small plane, according to the pilot, who was quoted in a book by John Alexander, the former Army colonel whose paranormal investigations were featured in the book and movie “The Men Who Stare at Goats.”

      As the Cold War intensified in the 1950s, U.S. officials worried the Soviet Union would use a UFO hoax to drum up fear in the American public. Civilians started seeing what they believed were UFOs but were actually secret spy planes, like the U-2, so the government settled on a policy of silence and denial.

      ''Over half of all U.F.O. reports from the late 1950s through the 1960s were accounted for by manned reconnaissance flights,” according to a secret CIA study that was declassified in the late 1990s, The New York Times reported then. ''This led the Air Force to make misleading and deceptive statements to the public in order to allay public fears and to protect an extraordinarily sensitive national security project.''

      The very real government stonewalling fed bogus conspiracy theories, which came to dominate the study of UFOs and made the topic even more off-putting to serious scholars.

      A new generation


      In recent years, though, a newer generation of activists has been at center of recent high-profile disclosures thanks to a more professional, careful and credible approach. They include people with serious national security credentials like Christopher Mellon, the former deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence, and Luis Elizondo, the former Army counterintelligence special agent who led an earlier Pentagon team to investigate UFOs.

      The budget for Elizondo’s team — a modest $22 million in the scheme of defense spending — was secured by former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, a powerful ally who has helped drive the resurgence of interest in UFOs.


      An unidentified aerial phenomenon in a U.S. military video. 
      (DoD via To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science)

      The newer activists have worked with mainstream news outlets to deliver evidence and eye witnesses that meet their high editorial standards and are careful when speaking to general audiences to avoid talking about aliens — though Mellon and Elizondo have appeared on controversial podcaster Joe Rogan’s show as well as "Coast to Coast A.M.," a long-running radio program devoted to conspiracies and the paranormal.

      Both the skeptics and the believers don’t expect the Pentagon report to settle anything. Instead, they hope it will start something new.

      “The idea of some super powerful aliens coming to visit us is a very compelling story,” West said. “So if you get even a tiny little taste of something like that, it really spices up the story.”


      UFOs and search for alien life: Science and popular culture take on the mission

      By Gregory McNamee, CNN

      If you're ever studied astronomy, you've probably been exposed to something called the Drake equation

      .
      © Department of Defense/AP This image from 2015 video provided by the Department of Defense, labeled Gimbal, shows an unexplained object at the center.

      One side of the equation posits the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which it might be possible to communicate. The other side gives all the variables that add up to that number, including the average rate of star formation, the number of planets around those stars that have developed intelligent life and the ability to send radio signals.

      © Alistair Heap/Alamy Stock Photo UFO spotters use flashlights to look for stars and aliens in the night sky in South Wales, Australia, in 2008.

      "Depending on how you calculate it, the answer can be none, or it can be a billion," said theoretical cosmologist Katie Mack, author of the recent book "The End of Everything (Astrophysically Speaking)."

      © NASA Does Martian soil hold proof of life on other planets? We've sent the Perseverance rover to find clues.

      Astrophysicist Frank Drake, who formulated the equation way back in 1961, said it's really a way of showing "all the things you needed to know to predict how hard it's going to be to detect extraterrestrial life."

      Mack put it more directly: "The point of the equation is really to show how little we know."

      If it's hard for professional scientists to run the numbers, it's harder still for us mere-mortal Earthlings to do the work.

      That's where the imagination comes in. So for generations we've been putting our creative minds to work in guessing if extraterrestrials exist, what they might look like and how we've going to greet them and they us, whether with a sign of peace or a ray gun.

      © Mike Windle/Getty Images Frank Drake speaks at a conference exploring the possibility of life on other planets at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco on October 7, 2015.

      UFOs: Have we been visited?


      "It's a curious thing that for as long as we've imagined extraterrestrials, they look pretty much just like us," observed Chris Impey, a professor of astronomy at the University of Arizona.

      "A couple of centuries ago, they came in galleons in the sky. When zeppelins were invented, the aliens flew in dirigibles. After World War II, they came in flying saucers, the latest and greatest technology we could imagine."
      © 1982 Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved. While we're waiting on the science about UFOs and signs of alien life, entertainment fills the gaps with movies such as "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial."

      The anthropomorphism — putting things that are not human in human form — is a constant. So, too, is the belief in alien life forms to begin with.


      Strong beliefs in alien visitations



      Video: Astrophysicist on UFO sightings: It looks terrestrial, not alien (CNN)





      According to a 2018 Chapman University study, 41.4% of Americans believe that extraterrestrials have visited Earth at some time or another, and 35.1% believe that they have done so in recent times.


      There are understandable reasons for such beliefs, Impey noted.


      For decades, some people have been convinced that the US government has been harboring secrets about visitors from afar ever since 1947, when they believe an alien spacecraft supposedly crashed near Roswell, New Mexico.

      "When you know that people aren't telling you everything they know, you start filling in the blanks yourself," said Impey. "The videos, the stories of Air Force and Navy pilots seeing mystery spacecraft, all of these things add up. It's just that people connect the dots way too quickly."

      Both scientists and many civilians hold to the maxim that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

      As a recent CNN story revealed, for years government and military officials alike ignored sightings of UFOs reported by both military and civilian pilots — just the sort of extraordinary evidence that might substantiate the reality of ETs. The Pentagon, which refers to UFOs as unidentified aerial phenomena, has confirmed the authenticity of videos and photographs accompanying those reports.

      Before that recent and still-unfolding news appeared, though, a hard-to-penetrate cone of silence has surrounded the whole question of UFOs, at least as far as the US government and military have been concerned.


      Fiction fills in the gaps


      Popular culture filled in the blanks, giving expression to UFOs and their otherworldly passengers in vehicles such as ComicCon, movies such as "Independence Day" and "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial" and the classic television series "Star Trek" with its bold search for new life and new civilizations.

      Beyond that, there's a host of conspiracy theories — some benign, some full of foreboding — with dark warnings of abductions and unwanted experiments.

      Impey called the question of UFOs "a cultural phenomenon, not a scientific one."

      For all that, he cited the late astronomer Carl Sagan's call for all sides in the discussion to keep an open mind — "but not so open," as Sagan said, that "your brains fall out."


      Searching the skies

      "From time immemorial, humans have wondered about whether we're alone," said Stephen Strom, former associate director of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory.

      Just because the popular imagination diverges from the scientific one doesn't invalidate our hope to encounter lifeforms from other worlds.

      After all, the question isn't just whether we're alone, but also whether other civilizations have done a better job of taking care of their planets than we have of taking care of Earth.

      It's a matter, then, of "whether it is possible for putative complex civilizations to avoid self-destruction," as Strom put it, and whether we can learn from them before it's too late. Those are among the most pressing questions we can ask these days.

      Granted, most space scientists don't share the view that extraterrestrial life is going to arrive on Earth via spacecraft in humanoid form. One who did, the late cosmologist Stephen Hawking, worried that if ETs did arrive that way, they'd likely be on a mission to destroy us.

      That doesn't mean that space scientists aren't serious in their search for extraterrestrial life.

      "Do we think aliens are out there?" asked Mack. "We don't know where, but there almost certainly are.

      "It's very unlikely that life has evolved in only one place in the entirety of the cosmos — the sorts of physical processes that had to occur on the early Earth are probably things that have happened countless other times on distant worlds."

      We're likely to learn about other life forms from rovers, spectrometers and chemical analyses of distant atmospheres, she added. When we do, the news will spread fast.

      As Mack said, "People really do want to know."


      AP Interview: ICC prosecutor sees 'reset' under Biden
      THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court said Monday that the global tribunal’s relationship with the United States — plunged into the deep freeze by former President Donald Trump — is undergoing a “reset” under his successor, Joe Biden.

      © Provided by The Canadian Press

      Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda made the comments in an interview with The Associated Press, on the day Biden was meeting NATO allies in Brussels to reaffirm Washington’s commitment to the military alliance — in another break from the Trump era of deep skepticism toward multilateralism.

      Bensouda spoke to AP at the court’s headquarters in The Hague on the eve of leaving office after her nine-year term as the ICC’s chief prosecutor. Her successor, British lawyer Karim Khan, takes office on Wednesday.

      The Trump administration hit Bensouda with sanctions for pressing ahead with investigations into the U.S. and its allies, notably Israel, for alleged war crimes. She was subjected to a travel ban in March 2019, and 18 months later a freeze on her U.S.-based assets.

      “I do believe that it was wrong. Really, a red line has been crossed,” Bensouda said of the sanctions.

      Biden lifted the sanctions in April but Secretary of State Antony Blinken stressed that Washington still strongly disagreed with some actions by the court.

      “We believe, however, that our concerns about these cases would be better addressed” through diplomacy “rather than through the imposition of sanctions,” Blinken wrote.

      Bensouda welcomed the change of tone.

      “We are at a more helpful place now because the Biden administration has decided to lift those sanctions and both the administration and ourselves, we are working on some kind of a reset that is the relationship between the ICC and the US administration,” she said.

      The court is investigating allegations of possible war crimes and crimes against humanity by U.S. troops and foreign intelligence operatives, as part of a wide-ranging investigation into the Afghanistan conflict that also covers alleged crimes by Afghan government forces and the Taliban.

      Afghan authorities have asked the court to take over the probe.

      Bensouda met with Afghan Foreign Minister Haneef Atmar last month to discuss the case.

      Atmar said after the meeting that “we are confident that with full cooperation with the Prosecutor, we can jointly advance the cause of justice for all of the victims of the long and devastating conflict.”

      Bensouda said Afghan authorities need to show the court that they are investigating the same alleged crimes identified by the ICC probe.

      “If they are able to provide us with this information that they are conducting these cases, then of course, we will have to take a step back and look at what they are doing and monitor that,” she said.

      Bensouda launched another politically charged investigation in March, into alleged crimes by both Israel and Hamas on Palestinian territories dating back to mid-2014. Israel has harshly condemned the probe.

      Bensouda warned both sides during the recent 11-day Gaza war that that she was watching their actions, which could be included in her ongoing investigation if they appeared to amount to possible crimes within the court’s jurisdiction.

      During the conflict, Israel destroyed a 12-story building housing media organizations including The Associated Press and Al Jazeera. The Israeli military, which gave AP journalists and other tenants about an hour to evacuate, claimed Hamas used the building for a military intelligence office and weapons development.

      Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders asked the International Criminal Court to investigate the bombing as a possible war crime. AP has called for an independent investigation of the attack.

      Bensouda did not say that her office is specifically looking at the attack, but said of the 11-day conflict: “We are not ignoring anything.”

      Asked whether Israel has provided any evidence to the court about the incident, she said: “Definitely we have not had anything come from Israel about this.”

      Bensouda has signaled that she would attempt to round off a series of preliminary investigations before she leaves office. On Monday, she announced that she has sought judges’ authorization to open an investigation into the Philippine government’s so-called “war on drugs.”

      Before leaving office, she also urged the court’s member states to adequately fund the institution, and the international community to help it by arresting suspects. The court itself does not have a police force to carry out arrests.

      She said funding for her office has not kept up with the soaring demand for investigations around the world.

      “If really we’re serious about international criminal justice, if we are serious about bringing justice to the victims, we also need to provide the court with the resources that it needs to do that work,” Bensouda said.

      Mike Corder, The Associated Press

      Haaland recommends full restoration of monuments Trump altered: report

      BY RACHEL FRAZIN - 06/14/21 


      OPINION

      Interior Secretary Deb Haaland recommended fully restoring protections to three national monuments that former President Trump either shrunk or otherwise rolled back, The Washington Post reported on Monday.

      She reportedly recommended the changes to the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante monuments in Utah, as well as the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument off the coast of Massachusetts.

      Trump reduced the size of Bears Ears, designated by former President Obama, by about 85 percent, and Grand Staircase-Escalante, designated by former President Clinton, by nearly half.


      He also decided to allow commercial fishing in the marine monument.

      Two sources told the Post of Haaland’s recommendations. They also said that the White House hasn’t made a final decision, but that President Biden favors undoing his predecessor’s actions.

      Spokespeople for the White House and the Interior Department declined The Hill’s request for comment.

      In an executive order, Biden directed Haaland to review monument boundaries and conditions changed under Trump to decide whether “restoration of the monument boundaries and conditions that existed as of January 20, 2017, would be appropriate.”

      He also directed her to submit a report detailing her findings.

      The government said in a Friday court filing that the report had been submitted on June 2 but did not detail what it concluded.

      In April, Haaland visited Utah to meet with stakeholders on the matter.

      Many tribes and environmental groups have pushed for restoring the monuments, while some fishing groups, Utah politicians and ranchers have favored the Trump-era changes.

       

      Ibuprofen and other NSAIDs superior to codeine for managing outpatient postoperative pain

      CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL

      Research News

      Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen provide better pain control and have fewer adverse effects than codeine, a commonly prescribed opioid, when prescribed after outpatient surgery, according to new research published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.201915.

      "In all surgery types, subgroups and outcome time points, NSAIDs were equal or superior to codeine for postoperative pain," writes Dr. Matthew Choi, Associate Professor of Surgery, McMaster University, with coauthors.

      The researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving more than 5100 adults to compare pain levels and safety of medications containing codeine, such as Tylenol #3, with NSAIDs. Patients who took NSAIDs had lower pain scores at 6 and 12 hours after treatment than patients taking codeine.

      "We found that patients randomized to NSAIDs following outpatient surgical procedures reported better pain scores, better global assessment scores, fewer adverse effects and no difference in bleeding events, compared with those receiving codeine," write the authors.

      Codeine is widely used for postoperative pain management and is the most commonly prescribed opioid in Canada. However, codeine is associated with a range of adverse effects and potential misuse or addiction. Alternatives such as NSAIDs can help reduce opioid use in patients after dental and surgical procedures.

      Given the range of procedures and dosage combinations included in the high-quality RCTs, the authors suggest that their results have wide clinical application.

      "These findings are of general importance to any clinician performing painful medical procedures. The various trials in our meta-analysis evaluated a range of procedures, different NSAID types and various degrees of acetaminophen administration."

      The authors conclude that their findings "strengthen existing evidence and are broadly generalizable to patients across surgical disciplines."

      ###

      "Managing postoperative pain in adult outpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing codeine with NSAIDs" is published June 14, 2021.

      CODIENE REMAINS THE OPIATE OF CHOICE FOR THE POOR 



      Introducing play to higher education reduces stress and forms deeper connection material

      Students fostered a more meaningful relationship with instructors when play was introduced

      UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER

      Research News

      A new study found higher education students are more engaged and motivated when they are taught using playful pedagogy rather than the traditional lecture-based method. The study was conducted by University of Colorado Denver counseling researcher Lisa Forbes and was published in the Journal of Teaching and Learning.

      While many educators in higher education believe play is a method that is solely used for elementary education, Forbes argues that play is important in post-secondary education to enhance student learning outcomes.

      Throughout the spring 2020 semester, Forbes observed students who were enrolled in three of her courses between the ages of 23-43. To introduce playful pedagogy, Forbes included games and play, not always tied to the content of that day's lesson, at the start of each class. She then provided many opportunities for role-play to practice counseling skills, and designed competitions within class activities.

      During the study, students mentioned they saw more opportunities for growth while learning in a highly interactive environment. Students also described that the hands-on nature of learning through play established a means for skill acquisition, and they were able to retain the content more effectively.

      "As we grow older, we're conditioned to believe that play is trivial, childish, and a waste of time," said Forbes. "This social script about play leads to it being excluded from higher education. A more interactive learning approach leads to a deeper and more rigorous connection to the material."

      To maintain what Forbes described as "rigor" within higher education, the most common approach tends to be lecture-based learning. However, according to Forbes, this mode of education is counter to the very outcomes educators set out to achieve.

      The results of the study suggest there is a unique and powerful classroom experience when play is valued and used in the learning process. According to Forbes, students who participated in this study also indicated that play increased positive emotions and connections with other students and the professor in the course.

      "I also saw that when I introduced play, it helped students let their guard down and allowed them to reduce their stress, fear, or anxiety," said Forbes. "Play even motivated students to be vulnerably engaged, take risks, and feel more connected to the content."

      Play is underutilized and devalued in higher education, according to Forbes. She suggests educators reevaluate their understanding of using play in graduate courses. Playful pedagogy creates an interactive and warm learning environment, resulting in greater understanding of the material. This method is also more aligned with the humanistic missions and values of universities and programs.

      ###

      Homo Ludens - Wikipedia

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_Ludens

      Homo Ludens is a book originally published in Dutch in 1938 by Dutch historian and cultural theorist Johan Huizinga. It discusses the importance of the play element of culture and society. Huizinga suggests that play is primary to and a necessary (though not sufficient) condition of the generation of culture. The Latin word ludens is the present active participle of the verb ludere, which itself is …

      Homo Ludens is an important part of the history of game studies. It influenced later scholars of play, like Roger Caillois. The concept of the magic circle was inspired by Homo Ludens.

       UNDERPAID, UNDERAPPRECIATED AMERICAN TEACHERS

      Job-related stress threatens the teacher supply - RAND survey

      RAND CORPORATION

      Research News

      Nearly one in four teachers may leave their job by the end of the current (2020-'21) school year, compared with one in six who were likely to leave prior to the pandemic, according to a new RAND Corporation survey. Teachers who identified as Black or African American were particularly likely to consider leaving.

      U.S. public-school teachers surveyed in January and February 2021 reported they are almost twice as likely to experience frequent job-related stress as the general employed adult population and almost three times as likely to experience depressive symptoms as the general adult population.

      These results suggest potential immediate and long-term threats to the teacher supply.

      "Teacher stress was a concern prior to the pandemic and may have only become worse. The experiences of teachers who were considering leaving at the time of our survey were similar in many ways to those of teachers who left the profession because of the pandemic," said Elizabeth Steiner, lead author of the report and a policy researcher at RAND, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization. "This raises the concern that more teachers may decide to quit this year than in past years if nothing is done to address challenging working conditions and support teacher well-being."

      Stressful working conditions included a mismatch between actual and preferred mode of instruction, lack of administrator and technical support, frequent technical issues with remote teaching, and lack of implementation of COVID-19 safety measures. Stressors relating to mode of instruction and health were ranked most highly by teachers surveyed.

      About a third of teachers were responsible for the care and learning support of their own children while teaching. These stressful working conditions were even more prevalent among teachers who were likely to quit after the onset of the pandemic, but not before.

      "Given that some pandemic-era stressors, such as remote teaching, might be here to stay, we think district and school leaders can support teachers' well-being by understanding current working conditions and their need for a more supportive and flexible work environment," said Ashley Woo, coauthor and an assistant policy researcher at RAND.

      The report recommends schools implement COVID-19 mitigation measures in a way that allows teachers to focus on instruction and offset worries about their health. Schools and districts should consider systematically collecting data about the mental health and well-being needs of teachers to understand the sources of teacher distress in their school communities while also working together to design and implement mental health and wellness supports. Helping teachers access childcare could go a long way to alleviating stress and promoting teacher retention, as would developing clear policies for remote teaching and adopting technology standards for remote teaching equipment.

      ###

      The survey was conducted using the RAND American Educator Panels, nationally representative samples of educators who provide their feedback on important issues of educational policy and practice.

      "Job-Related Stress Threatens the Teacher Supply: Key Findings from the 2021 State of the U.S. Teacher Survey" was supported by the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers.

      RAND Education and Labor, a division of RAND, is dedicated to improving education and expanding economic opportunities for all through research and analysis. Its researchers address key policy issues in U.S. and international education systems and labor markets, from pre-kindergarten to retirement planning.

      Huge prehistoric croc 'river boss' prowled SEQ waterways

      UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND

      Research News

      IMAGE

      IMAGE: ARTISTIC REPRESENTATION OF GUNGGAMARANDU MAUNALAview more 

      CREDIT: ELEANOR PEASE

      A new species of large prehistoric croc that roamed south-east Queensland's waterways millions of years ago has been documented by University of Queensland researchers.

      PhD candidate Jorgo Ristevski, from UQ's School of Biological Sciences, led the team that named the species Gunggamarandu maunala after analysing a partial skull unearthed in the Darling Downs in the nineteenth century.

      "This is one of the largest crocs to have ever inhabited Australia," Mr Ristevski said.

      "At the moment it's difficult to estimate the exact overall size of Gunggamarandu since all we have is the back of the skull - but it was big.

      "We estimate the skull would have been at least 80 centimetres long, and based on comparisons with living crocs, this indicates a total body length of around seven metres.

      "This suggests Gunggamarandu maunala was on par with the largest Indo-Pacific crocs - a Crocodylus porosus) - recorded.

      "We also had the skull CT-scanned, and from that we were able to digitally reconstruct the brain cavity, which helped us unravel additional details about its anatomy.

      "The exact age of the fossil is uncertain, but it's probably between two and five million years old."

      Gunggamarandu belonged to a group of crocodylians called tomistomines or 'false gharials'.

      "Today, there's only one living species of tomistomine, Tomistoma schlegelii, which is restricted to the Malay Peninsula and parts of Indonesia," Mr Ristevski said.

      "With the exception of Antarctica, Australia was the only other continent without fossil evidence of tomistomines.

      "But with the discovery of Gunggamarandu we can add Australia to the 'once inhabited by tomistomines' list."

      Despite its discovery, the fossil skull of Gunggamarandu maunala remained a scientific mystery for more than a century.

      The specimen piqued the interest of then-young graduate student Dr Steve Salisbury in the 1990s, but a formal study was not done until Mr Ristevski began his examination.

      "I knew it was unusual, and potentially very significant, but I didn't have the time to study it in any detail," Dr Salisbury said.

      "The name of the new species honours the First Nations peoples of the Darling Downs area, incorporating words from the languages of the Barunggam and Waka Waka nations.

      "The genus name, Gunggamarandu, means 'river boss', while the species name, maunala, means 'hole head'.

      "The latter is in reference to the large, hole-like openings located on top of the animal's skull that served as a place for muscle attachment."

      The research has been published in the open access journal Nature Scientific Reports (DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1296).


      CAPTION

      Hypothetical outline of the skull of Gunggamarandu maunala, with the fossil skull piece depicted in its corresponding position, compared with a 1.8m tall human.

      CREDIT

      Jorgo Ristevski